Next Article in Journal
Visibility of Vertical Road Signs in Real Driving Environments: Effects of Retroreflectivity and Surface Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Convolutional and Recurrent Artificial Neural Networks in the Context of BIM: Deep Insight and New Tool, Bimetria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Span SFT with Flexible Constraints

1
Zhejiang Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310051, China
2
Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures 2026, 11(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010007
Submission received: 10 November 2025 / Revised: 11 December 2025 / Accepted: 18 December 2025 / Published: 23 December 2025

Abstract

The boundary of a submerged floating tunnel (SFT) is flexible, and ignoring the influence of boundary and pipeline connections may reduce its structural performance. Therefore, this study uses rotating springs and linear springs to simulate the flexible boundary. Joints are simplified as shear springs and bending springs. A multi-span SFT model on discrete elastic supports is established, and its seismic response is evaluated using the transfer matrix method and the modal superposition method. The proposed method is validated by comparing it with finite element results, and the vertical mechanical response of the SFT when the cable relaxes or fractures under earthquake action is analyzed. The results indicate a significant deviation between the seismic response of flexible constraints and those modeled as simple hinged or fixed connections, and the lower boundary constraint stiffness is beneficial to the seismic response of the SFT. Introducing flexible joints can effectively reduce the internal force response of the structure, and a bending stiffness ratio of 0.01 to 0.03 for the joints is considered reasonable. In contrast, variations in the shear stiffness of the joints have a relatively small impact on the seismic response.
Keywords: submerged floating tunnel; transfer matrix method; finite element method; cable submerged floating tunnel; transfer matrix method; finite element method; cable

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Ma, M.; Wang, D.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Y.; Shen, Y. Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Span SFT with Flexible Constraints. Infrastructures 2026, 11, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010007

AMA Style

Chen J, Ma M, Wang D, Chen X, Zheng Y, Shen Y. Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Span SFT with Flexible Constraints. Infrastructures. 2026; 11(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jiang, Mingyuan Ma, Dan Wang, Xing Chen, Yin Zheng, and Yonggang Shen. 2026. "Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Span SFT with Flexible Constraints" Infrastructures 11, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010007

APA Style

Chen, J., Ma, M., Wang, D., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., & Shen, Y. (2026). Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Span SFT with Flexible Constraints. Infrastructures, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop