Next Article in Journal
The Limitations of Reward Effects on Saccade Latencies: An Exploration of Task-Specificity and Strength
Next Article in Special Issue
Eye Movements Actively Reinstate Spatiotemporal Mnemonic Content
Previous Article in Journal
Bela Julesz in Depth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention
Open AccessReview

Meaning and Attentional Guidance in Scenes: A Review of the Meaning Map Approach

Center for Mind and Brain, 267 Cousteau Place, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vision 2019, 3(2), 19;
Received: 27 February 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 10 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Movements and Visual Cognition)
Perception of a complex visual scene requires that important regions be prioritized and attentionally selected for processing. What is the basis for this selection? Although much research has focused on image salience as an important factor guiding attention, relatively little work has focused on semantic salience. To address this imbalance, we have recently developed a new method for measuring, representing, and evaluating the role of meaning in scenes. In this method, the spatial distribution of semantic features in a scene is represented as a meaning map. Meaning maps are generated from crowd-sourced responses given by naïve subjects who rate the meaningfulness of a large number of scene patches drawn from each scene. Meaning maps are coded in the same format as traditional image saliency maps, and therefore both types of maps can be directly evaluated against each other and against maps of the spatial distribution of attention derived from viewers’ eye fixations. In this review we describe our work focusing on comparing the influences of meaning and image salience on attentional guidance in real-world scenes across a variety of viewing tasks that we have investigated, including memorization, aesthetic judgment, scene description, and saliency search and judgment. Overall, we have found that both meaning and salience predict the spatial distribution of attention in a scene, but that when the correlation between meaning and salience is statistically controlled, only meaning uniquely accounts for variance in attention. View Full-Text
Keywords: attention; scene perception; eye movements attention; scene perception; eye movements
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Henderson, J.M.; Hayes, T.R.; Peacock, C.E.; Rehrig, G. Meaning and Attentional Guidance in Scenes: A Review of the Meaning Map Approach. Vision 2019, 3, 19.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop