Next Article in Journal
A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
Previous Article in Journal
Does Warm-up Type Matter? A Comparison between Traditional and Functional Inertial Warm-up in Young Soccer Players
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Reply published on 24 November 2020, see J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5(4), 86.
Comment

Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”

1
Faculty of Science, School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
2
Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
3
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5(4), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085
Received: 1 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Sports Nutrition: Body Composition and Performance)
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

Campbell and colleagues recently published a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of diets involving intermittent energy restriction versus continuous energy restriction on changes in body composition and resting metabolic rate (RMR) in resistance-trained adults[...] View Full-Text
Keywords: diet; caloric restriction; refeed; diet break; nutrition; sports nutrition; fat loss; weight loss; lean mass; resting energy expenditure; resting metabolic rate; athlete diet; caloric restriction; refeed; diet break; nutrition; sports nutrition; fat loss; weight loss; lean mass; resting energy expenditure; resting metabolic rate; athlete
MDPI and ACS Style

Peos, J.; Brown, A.W.; Vorland, C.J.; Allison, D.B.; Sainsbury, A. Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085

AMA Style

Peos J, Brown AW, Vorland CJ, Allison DB, Sainsbury A. Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2020; 5(4):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peos, Jackson, Andrew W. Brown, Colby J. Vorland, David B. Allison, and Amanda Sainsbury. 2020. "Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”" Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 5, no. 4: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040085

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop