This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Functional Differences Across Playing Roles in Volleyball: A Sensor-Based Assessment
by
Juri Taborri
Juri Taborri 1,*
,
Mauro Strippoli
Mauro Strippoli 1,
Luca Molinaro
Luca Molinaro 2
and
Stefano Rossi
Stefano Rossi 1
1
Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, University of Tuscia, Largo dell’Università snc, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Department of Theoretical and Applied Science, eCampus University, 22060 Novedrate, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2026, 11(2), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020238 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 May 2026
/
Revised: 10 June 2026
/
Accepted: 11 June 2026
/
Published: 13 June 2026
Abstract
Objectives: Volleyball playing positions are associated with different functional demands. This study compared postural control, jump performance, and upper-limb mobility across playing roles in competitive male volleyball players. Methods: Fifty male volleyball players competing in the Italian Serie C championship were equally distributed across five roles: middle blockers (MB), liberos (LIB), opposite hitters (OH), setters (SET), and outside hitters (HIT). Using a wearable inertial sensor, athletes performed bipodalic balance tasks with eyes open and closed, dominant- and non-dominant-leg single-leg balance, squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and bilateral upper-limb flexion and extension tests. Results: Significant role-related differences emerged in balance and jump performance. In bipodalic balance, the eyes-open condition showed a mixed pattern, with HIT displaying the largest ellipse area and SET showing the highest path-related values, whereas in the eyes-closed condition, HIT showed the highest values across all stabilometric parameters. In the single-leg stance, OH showed the largest postural excursions on the dominant side, while LIB stood out on the non-dominant side. In jump tests, MB showed the best vertical performance in both SJ and CMJ, whereas LIB and SET generally showed the lowest outputs. Temporal differences also emerged across roles. Upper-limb mobility was similar across roles in flexion, while extension showed a role-specific pattern, with SET displaying greater ROM than LIB, HIT, and OH. Conclusions: Volleyball roles are associated with distinct functional profiles in balance, jump mechanics, and upper-limb mobility. This integrated assessment may support more specific training, monitoring, and injury-prevention strategies.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Taborri, J.; Strippoli, M.; Molinaro, L.; Rossi, S.
Functional Differences Across Playing Roles in Volleyball: A Sensor-Based Assessment. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2026, 11, 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020238
AMA Style
Taborri J, Strippoli M, Molinaro L, Rossi S.
Functional Differences Across Playing Roles in Volleyball: A Sensor-Based Assessment. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2026; 11(2):238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020238
Chicago/Turabian Style
Taborri, Juri, Mauro Strippoli, Luca Molinaro, and Stefano Rossi.
2026. "Functional Differences Across Playing Roles in Volleyball: A Sensor-Based Assessment" Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 11, no. 2: 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020238
APA Style
Taborri, J., Strippoli, M., Molinaro, L., & Rossi, S.
(2026). Functional Differences Across Playing Roles in Volleyball: A Sensor-Based Assessment. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 11(2), 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020238
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.