Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Fish Species in Wanlv Lake, the Largest Drinking Water Source in South China, by Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Technology
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Skin Mucus Immunity, Carotenoid Content, Sexual Parameters, and Growth Response in Guppy Fish (Poecilia reticulata) Fed with Green Algae (Chaetomorpha aerea) Diets
Previous Article in Journal
Distribution and Management of Residual Antibiotics in the Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp Farming Environment: Recommendations for Effective Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selenium Protects Yellow Catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco) from Low-Temperature Damage via the Perspective Analysis of Metabolomics and Intestinal Microbes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Organic Acid Salts as Feed Additives in Some Aquatic Organisms: Potassium Diformate

by
Junxiang Chen
1,2,†,
Shilong He
1,3,†,
Zelong Zhang
1,†,
Jiajun Li
1,
Xiuxia Zhang
1,
Juntao Li
1,
Jiarui Xu
1,
Peihua Zheng
1,
Jianan Xian
1,2,3,* and
Yaopeng Lu
1,*
1
Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory for Functional Components Research and Utilization of Marine Bio-Resources, Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
Ocean College, Hebei Agricultural University, Qinhuangdao 066003, China
3
College of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fishes 2024, 9(3), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9030085
Submission received: 5 February 2024 / Revised: 19 February 2024 / Accepted: 22 February 2024 / Published: 24 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Relationship between Nutrition and the Immune Response of Fish)

Abstract

:
Antibiotics are the primary measures employed in the prevention and treatment of diseases in aquaculture. However, the frequent utilization of antibiotics can significantly impact the growth and reproduction of aquatic organisms, resulting in water pollution. The European Union (EU) has prohibited antibiotic additives in animal feed. Potassium diformate (KDF) represents the first non-antibiotic feed additive approved by the EU as a viable alternative to antibiotics. Its application in animal nutrition has been validated, demonstrating beneficial health effects. This article reviews the physicochemical properties, biological functions, synthesis conditions, and applications of KDF in aquaculture and looks toward to its future potential. It also provides insights into improving the utilization of KDF in aquaculture practices.
Key Contribution: Potassium diformate (KDF) is the first feed additive approved by the European Unionin 2001 to replace antibiotics for growth promotion, presenting a distinct efficacy compared to that of other feed additives. There is more than one review related to the use of organic acids and KDF in livestock and poultry, the use of KDF in aquaculture is booming, and we believe that analyzing and organizing the application of KDF in the field of aquaculture can provide useful references for many people in need.

1. Introduction

Aquatic animal products constitute an indispensable component of the human diet, with the global demand surpassing that of beef, pork, and poultry products [1]. Fish, in particular, stands out as an optimal source of nutrition for humans due to its rich content of easily digestible high-quality proteins, essential fats (such as long-chain omega-3 fatty acids), vitamins (D, A, and B), and minerals [2]. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the proportion of global fish production designated for direct human consumption has markedly increased from 67% in the 1960s to 87% in 2014, surpassing 146 million tons [3]. With the advancement of modern aquaculture, aquaculture models have shifted from extensive farming systems to semi-intensive and intensive farming systems. However, the intensification of aquaculture has escalated the incidence of disease outbreaks in cultured species, resulting in significant mortality and economic losses [4]. Under these circumstances, the primary challenge for aquaculturists is to minimize disease outbreaks, while enhancing the growth rate of aquatic organisms [5].
The incorporation of antibiotics has been the primary measure for the prevention and treatment of diseases in aquaculture. Nevertheless, the excessive use of antibiotics can lead to antibiotic residues, water pollution, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This is a significant concern for environmental health and the longevity of effective disease control strategies [6]. On 1 January 2006, the European Union (EU) instituted a comprehensive ban on the use of antibiotic additives in animal feed. Potassium diformate (KDF) represents the first non-antibiotic feed additive authorized for substituting antibiotic additives [7]. This additive possesses many functions, including pathogen inhibition, the promotion of animal growth, the modulation of animals’ gut microbiota, and the enhancement of animal digestibility [8]. The use of KDF in animals is safe, devoid of residue concerns, and does not give rise to the issues related to antibiotic resistance. KDF, as a feed additive in livestock and poultry, finds widespread application due to its unique biological activity and antibacterial properties, playing a crucial role in livestock and poultry production [9]. Research indicates that the appropriate addition of KDF can significantly enhance the growth rate and feed efficiency of livestock and poultry. Simultaneously, it exhibits inhibitory effects on certain pathogenic bacteria, reducing the risk of disease outbreaks [10]. Furthermore, KDF positively influences the digestive systems of animals, contributing to the maintenance of intestinal microecological balance and the improvement of digestive absorption efficiency [9,10,11,12]. As a feed additive serving as an alternative to antibiotics, KDF demonstrates potential effects in promoting health and preventing diseases in livestock and poultry production. KDF already has a certain application foundation in poultry and livestock; however, further research is needed on the application of KDF in aquaculture. This article reviews the current research on KDF in aquaculture, explaining its physicochemical properties, mechanism of action, application effects, and potential issues, aiming to provide a reference for the future application of KDF in the field of aquaculture.

2. Chemical Properties and Mechanisms of Action

KDF is an organic acid salt. It is a dimer formed through hydrogen bonding between one molecule of formic acid and one molecule of potassium formate [13]. The chemical formula of KDF is HCOOH·HCOOK, with a molecular weight of 130.14. It is a white or slightly yellow crystalline powder with no discernible pungent odor [14]. KDF dissolves in water and exhibits a pronounced hygroscopic nature. Its aqueous solution is acidic and remains stable under acidic conditions, while it decomposes into formate and formic acid under neutral or slightly alkaline conditions. The anti-mold performance of KDF in animal feed has been studied using the plate counting method. Compared with formic acid, KDF overcomes the irritability, corrosiveness, and instability of formic acid. Therefore, KDF is a more suitable additive in feed, providing a safer and more stable solution in maintaining the balance of microbial communities in aquatic animals [15]. Compared with the widely used mold inhibitor sodium diacetate (SDA), KDF exhibits better mold resistance in animal feed [15].
The key reasons for KDF serving as a growth promoter are its safety and antimicrobial properties, which stem from its simple and unique molecular structure. Generally speaking, the chemical structure of KDF (HCOOH·HCOOK) contains formic acid and potassium formate groups. Naturally existing in nature and in the intestines of animals, it eventually decomposes into CO2 and water, exhibiting complete biodegradability [16]. The unique antimicrobial functionality is based on the combined action of formic acid and formate salts.
KDF dissociates gently into potassium formate and formic acid, releasing H+ ions, thereby reducing the pH of the digestive tract. The primary targets of free formic acid and its salts in the digestive system are the stomach. The gastric environment plays a suppressive role in bacterial selection and acts as an ecological filter. The production of non-dissociated formic acid can penetrate bacterial cell walls and release protons into the cytoplasm. Consequently, bacteria consume a significant amount of ATP to excrete protons, attempting to maintain the balance of the intracellular pH [16]. This results in cellular energy depletion and ultimately leads to cell death (Figure 1).

3. Production and Market Conditions

KDF has always been an inevitable subject of discussion. The production of KDF is orchestrated through a chemical reaction between potassium hydroxide and formic acid, necessitating the precise oversight of the production parameters [17]. The reaction is highly exothermic, demanding rigorous temperature control. Furthermore, the raw materials are readily accessible. Transitioning to its global market dynamics, significant impacts on this industry have been noted due to regulatory changes, as observed in the European and Australasian markets. For example, the anticipation of the EU’s prohibition on growth-promoting antibiotics in animal feed stimulated an increased demand and research focus on alternative products, including KDF [18]. So far, the use of potassium diformate (KDF) is less frequently reported in industrially underdeveloped areas. It is speculated that the global promotion of KDF may be limited by the production conditions and transportation costs. The simplification of the production process of KDF may promote its widespread dissemination [19].
Considering the costs associated with the utilization of KDF in farming, its usage proves to be highly economical [19]. The cost of 98% concentrated KDF specifically for farming purposes is just about USD 1.65–1.80 per kg in some markets in the United States, while on Chinese platforms, it ranges between about USD 3.06 and 4.17 per kg. Considering the relatively small rate of addition in production, only a very minimal increase in the overall production cost is incurred. In sum, the global farming industry is steadily steering towards environmentally friendly and sustainable practices. The market for KDF is projected to expand, fueled by the growing demand for healthy alternatives to antibiotics in animal feed [20].

4. The Application of KDF in Aquaculture

KDF can enhance the growth performance, improve the feed efficiency, heighten immunomodulation, increase the disease resistance, and regulate the intestinal microbiota balance of aquatic organisms [21] (Figure 2, Table 1).

4.1. Enhancing Growth Performance and Feed Efficiency

Since KDF is applied as an additive in aquatic feed, researchers continuously explore its health-promoting effects on aquaculture organisms. Relative to other feed additives, KDF has a wider range of applications. Besides improving the growth performance of aquatic animals, it also benefits the preservation of feed. In a study on Osphronemus goramy, it was noted that the addition of KDF significantly increased their feeding rate. This phenomenon is attributed to the elevated levels of KDF in the feed, subsequently influencing the osmoregulatory system of the fish. Because KDF is an organic acid salt, the energy for growth is only available in small amounts, and the remainder is utilized to balance the osmoregulatory system of fish. Additionally, KDF has the capability to eliminate pathogenic bacterial cells in the digestive tract, increase the population of symbiotic bacteria, and enhance the absorption of nutritional substances in the feed (Figure 1). This makes the nutrients in the feed more easily absorbed, thereby improving the efficiency and value of feeding. KDF induces acidity in an animal’s digestive tract. This contributes to the enhancement of assimilative enzyme activity, thereby increasing the feed intake to promote weight gain. Following the addition of 0.3% KDF, Osphronemus goramy achieved an average daily growth rate of 1.31%. In aquaculture experiments, a 1% daily growth rate is considered favorable for Osphronemus goramy, as it is a species known for its relatively slow growth [31]. Similar results were observed in a study on sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), where three treatment groups were designed. Following the addition of KDF, sea bass exhibited more pronounced increases in final body weight and weight gain compared to those of the control group. Juvenile sea bass also demonstrated higher protein efficiency ratios and protein productive values, with the highest total protein content reaching 7.42 g/dL, compared to the control group’s 5.57 g/dL [33]. The incorporation of KDF in the feed enhanced mineral absorption in the intestine stimulated the secretion of certain enzymes, such as proteases, thereby promoting growth [36]. In the experiment involving juvenile Beluga (H. huso), Sayah et al. [32] combined the use of KDF and calcium diformate (CaDF) to assess their impact on the growth of juvenile Beluga. KDF and calcium diformate (CaDF) share similar functions, allowing for synergistic research. These experiments indicate that feeding KDF can improve the feed conversion ratio and specific growth rate in juvenile Beluga. This is attributed to the stimulation of digestive enzyme secretion upon incorporating KDF into the feed, leading to heightened feeding interest in juvenile Beluga, and consequently promoting their growth performance [37]. Overall, the aforementioned studies underscore the significant role of KDF supplementation in the growth performance and digestion of aquaculture species [38].

4.2. Improving Disease Resistance

In numerous aquatic organisms, the addition of KDF to feed has demonstrated beneficial effects in enhancing their immune system and disease resistance. An increased or decreased white blood cell count can serve as an indicator of an organism’s disease resistance [39]. White blood cells play a crucial role in the defense system of fish against pathogenic infections [40]. They possess non-specific immune defense functions, enabling them to eliminate pathogens through phagocytosis [41]. The fish’s defense system releases neutrophils triggered by external chemical stimuli or chemotaxis in the event of infection [42]. The typical white blood cell count range for freshwater fish is 2.0–15.0 × 10−4 cells/mm3 [43]. In a cultivation experiment with Osteochilus hasselti, KDF addition to the feed enhanced the immune response of O. hasselti [43]. The lowest average white blood cell count was observed in the group with no KDF, while the highest increase was observed in the KDF group. KDF can disrupt the osmoregulatory system within an organism [44]. According to Lantu, an excess of salt within a fish’s body can lead to the fish expending more energy to stabilize its osmoregulatory system [34]. Red blood cells contain oxygen-binding hemoglobin, and their quantity is influenced by a fish’s activity, water temperature, species, age, gender, and nutritional status. The control group showed the lowest average increase in red blood cells, measuring 2.05 × 106 cells/mm3, while the KDF-added group (0.3%) exhibited the highest average increase, reaching 2.49 × 106 cells/mm3. The normal range of red blood cells in bony fish is generally between 1.00 and 3.00 × 106 cells/mm3. An increase in red blood cells leads to a higher concentration of hemoglobin, allowing for the binding of more oxygen. The results indicate that among all the treatments, Nilem fish exhibited a significant decrease in the red blood cell count. However, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5% KDF added to the feed caused relatively higher red blood cell counts than those in the control group (0%). This may be attributed to the enhanced resistance of the organisms due to the addition of KDF, leading to an increase in white blood cell count in Nilem fish. Consequently, the groups given KDF showed lower infection levels, allowing organs such as the liver, spleen, and spinal cord to continue forming red blood cells.
KDF possesses the potential to alleviate the symptoms of infection in aquatic animals. Aeromonas hydrophila, a commonly found bacteria in aquatic environments, is the primary bacterial species responsible for fish mortality [45]. Infection with A. hydrophila results in noticeable symptoms, such as a loss of appetite, surface lesions, gill hemorrhage, edema, and ulcers, which can lead to the swelling and damage of the liver, kidneys, and spleen, resulting in death [46]. KDF can alleviate the aforementioned symptoms [47,48]. One researcher noted that fish infected with A. hydrophila exhibited pathological changes, such as darkening of their body color, weakness, unresponsiveness to feed, and local hemorrhaging [49]. The exotoxins released by A. hydrophila circulate throughout the body via the bloodstream, leading to hemolysis and ruptured blood vessels. This vascular and tissue rupture leads to visible hemorrhaging on the body surface [50]. The condition of the body’s surface deteriorated between Day 3 and Day 9. Nilem (O. hasselti) fingerlings infected with A. hydrophila exhibited symptoms such as hemorrhaging, exophthalmos, ulceration, and dropsy [50]. Hemorrhaging is the initial response to A. hydrophila infection, resulting in tissue damage [51]. Dropsy is attributed to the secretion of the aerolysin cytotoxic enterotoxin (ACT) gene, which contributes to tissue damage. According to Noor El Deen et al., fish infected with A. hydrophila exhibited superficial skin lesions, leading to imbalanced swimming, a darkened body color, exophthalmia, and hemorrhaging [52]. However, administering KDF can treat the complex infection symptoms caused by A. hydrophila in aquatic animals within a relatively short period. Elala et al. supplemented the diet of A. hydrophila-infected Oreochromis niloticus with 0.3% KDF. Beyond the 14th day, the injuries tended to heal in response to the KDF treatment. This recovery is attributed to the potent antibacterial and antiviral activities of KDF, thereby enhancing the overall health status of the host [18]. The fish fed an organic acid blend and potassium diformate as feed additives showed a significant reduction in the total bacterial count per gram of feces. Da Silva et al. identified organic acids (butyrate, propionate, and acetate) as having the most pronounced inhibitory effects against Vibrio sp. in marine shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei [53]. These acids can permeate the membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, releasing protons into the cytoplasm [54]. The bacteria undergo substantial ATP expenditure in their efforts to extrude protons to preserve the equilibrium of the intracellular pH [55], leading to the depletion of cellular energy resources and culminating in cellular demise (Figure 1). The serum total proteins play a key role in immune responses and serve as a fundamental indicator of the health status of fish [56]. Hussein et al. [33]. revealed that feeding with diets containing 2–3 g/kg of KDF significantly increased the sea bass’s total protein content, phagocytic rate, and lysozyme activity compared to those of the control group. The inclusion of 2 g/kg of KDF in the diet can be used as an immunostimulant. KDF enhances the fish’s immune system and exhibits a robust health-promoting effect [57].
In summary, the existing data suggest that KDF may enhance the immune response of aquatic animals, and consequently improve the disease resistance of aquaculture organisms by elevating levels of immune components and modulating the expression of immune-related genes. However, the mechanistic impact of KDF on the immune system of aquatic animals requires further in-depth investigation at the molecular and cellular levels.

4.3. Modulation of the Gut Microbiota

KDF exhibits inhibitory effects on most harmful intestinal bacteria. Other studies indicate that KDF demonstrates stronger antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella compared to Lactobacillus, enhancing the overall health of the intestinal microbiota in cultured animals. Research has shown that the addition of varying levels of KDF, specifically 1, 1.5, and 2 g per kg, to the diet of H. huso led to an increase in intestinal lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in H. huso after 60 days [32]. Organic acids have a regulatory effect on the intestinal health of H. huso, such as enhancing their intestinal balance and digestion, removing toxins, and improving their immune status [32]. Saliva et al. indicated that KDF as well as propionates, butyrates, and acetates had inhibitory effects on Vibrio species [58]. Formic acid inhibits V. cholerae, V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. anguillarum [59]. Abu-Elala and Ragaa [23] conducted a cultivation experiment with O. niloticus and added KDF (0, 1, 2, and 3 g/kg) to the feed. The addition of KDF to the feed improved the feed efficiency of O. niloticus. The feed containing KDF significantly reduced the total bacterial count in the feces, which is attributed to lipophilic organic acids being able to diffuse into the cell membranes of Gram-negative bacteria and acidifying them, leading to bacterial death. The addition of KDF to the feed enhanced the relative abundance of intestinal bacteria in O. niloticus. Zhou et al. [27] similarly found that the addition of KDF to the daily diet can impact the intestinal microbiota of external bacteria by selectively increasing the relative bacterial abundance (RBA, %) of the genus Bifidobacterium, such as α-Proteobacterium IMCC1702-like, Streptococcus P14-like, and three uncultured bacterial species.
L. vannamei is one of the most extensively cultured shrimp species globally, representing a significant portion of shrimp aquaculture. Investigating feed additives to enhance the production of the South American white shrimp is of paramount importance. Other researchers explored the effects of KDF, sodium formate (SF), and a combination of KDF+SF. The addition of KDF to the daily diet significantly reduced the total culturable bacterial count (TCBC) and presumptive Vibrio spp. count (PVC) in all the treatment groups [35]. Similarly, the total bacterial count in the feces of red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) significantly decreased when using different doses of a mixture of organic acids and 0.3% KDF [60]. The addition of KDF (2%) to L. vannamei feed for 15 days resulted in a reduced TCBC and PVC. When varying amounts of butyrate salts were added to the feed of L. vannamei, the count of Vibrio species decreased at 27 and 47 days [58]. According to Mine and Boopathy [61], formic acetic, propionic, and butyric acids have inhibitory effects on V. harveyi, with formic acid showing the strongest inhibition. KDF can penetrate bacterial cells, leading to intracellular pH reduction, which inhibits bacterial metabolism, resulting in cell death, which is the primary reason for the decrease in bacterial count caused by these acids. These findings carry important implications for animal farming, particularly shrimp farming.

4.4. Reducing Intestinal pH Levels

Under typical conditions, the gastrointestinal pH of aquatic organisms is generally maintained between 5 and 8. Proteins undergo degradation due to amino acids in this slightly acidic-to-mildly alkaline environment. The dissociation state of these amino acids can significantly influence their absorption rate [17,18,19,31,60]. By supplementing KDF in the feed of aquaculture organisms, a microbial balance is achieved in the digestive tract, maintaining an appropriate pH, eliminating pathogenic microorganisms, and preserving the health of the organisms. Adding KDF to the feed is a preventive alternative for maintaining the health of farmed fish. This can lower the intestinal pH [62], suppress the growth of pathogenic bacteria, mainly Gram-negative bacteria, aid in nutrient digestion and absorption, and have beneficial effects on animals’ production performance [19]. KDF enhances the feed performance. Within the gastrointestinal tract, KDF can lower the pH in the small intestine by transporting H+ ions. KDF inhibits the growth of Gram-negative bacteria by dissociating the acids in bacterial cells after entering the intestine [63]. At pH < 5, the number of several Gram-negative bacterial species decreases. A low pH forms a natural barrier against bacteria from the ileum and large intestine. Low-molecular-weight KDF is lipophilic and can penetrate the cell membranes of Gram-negative bacteria [64]. The supplementation of KDF can reduce the population of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, while increasing the population of acid-resistant beneficial bacteria, such as lactobacilli.
Ng et al. [60] found that the pH of the feed decreased as the KDF concentration increased, leading to a reduction in chyme pH in the stomach by 0.22 and a maximum reduction of 0.53 in the intestinal chyme. Compared to the control group, the addition of KDF to the feed significantly reduced the intestinal chyme pH in red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Lowering the gastric pH activates gastric proteases, and reducing the intestinal pH may increase the mineral solubility. Baruah et al. [60] reported a decrease in the feed pH from 5.87 to 4.85, followed by a decrease in the chyme pH in the intestines. The higher the KDF content in the feed is, the lower the intestinal pH is, which has a more significant impact on the nutritional utilization and growth performance of tilapia.
The intestinal pH of O. goramy decreased after adding KDF to the feed. In the feed with 0.3% KDF, the initial pH was 7.01, and the final pH was 6.61. In the feed with 0.5% KDF, the initial pH was 7.01, and the final pH was 6.49. In the feed with 0.8% KDF, the initial pH was 7.11, and the final pH was 6.12. Fish receiving KDF had a lower stomach pH compared to those without KDF. The reduction in stomach pH allows for faster digestion of the feed, and a lower pH facilitates better feed breakdown, promoting fish growth [31].

5. Conclusions

KDF exhibits various effects, including antibacterial activity, growth promotion, an improved feed conversion ratio (FCR), the regulation of intestinal microbiota, and a reduction in the intestinal pH. However, the practical application of KDF faces several challenges. Its physical properties, such as its susceptibility to high-temperature decomposition and high hygroscopicity, make it sensitive to environmental factors (temperature, humidity, pH, etc.) during processing and storage. Nevertheless, extensive research is still needed through further investigations.
To enhance our understanding of how KDF benefits aquatic animals, experimental designs must consider the life stages, nutritional levels, living environments, aquaculture systems, and health conditions. The quantity used in aquaculture experiments must be clearly defined, as the excessive use of KDF can impact the digestion, absorption, and metabolism of mineral elements. Exceeding a certain amount of KDF may not produce additional benefits, or may even have adverse effects, highlighting the necessity of defining the appropriate usage levels.
Research on the application of KDF has primarily focused on livestock and poultry production, with limited studies in aquaculture. With the global implementation of “antibiotic-free feed” policies, KDF is poised to benefit from significant development opportunities. Future research should prioritize the preparation and processing techniques of KDF, expanding its application scope. Lowering the cost of KDF use and addressing practical application challenges can facilitate its adoption in aquaculture, contributing to sustainable and environmentally friendly practices in the aquaculture industry, ensuring the safety of aquatic products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C. and S.H.; methodology, Z.Z.; software, J.L. (Jiajun Li); validation, X.Z., J.L. (Juntao Li) and J.X. (Jiarui Xu); formal analysis, P.Z.; investigation, J.X. (Jianan Xian); writing—original draft preparation, J.C., S.H. and Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.X. (Jianan Xian) and Y.L.; visualization, J.C., S.H. and Z.Z.; supervision, J.X. (Jianan Xian) and Y.L.; project administration, J.X. (Jianan Xian) and Y.L.; funding acquisition, J.X. (Jianan Xian) and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 420QN338).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to this article is a review article and does not involve experimental operations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tacon, A.G.J.; Metian, M. Fish matters: Importance of aquatic foods in human nutrition and global food supply. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2013, 21, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lall, S.P.; Dumas, A. Nutritional requirements of cultured fish: Formulating nutritionally adequate feeds. In Feed and Feeding Practices in Aquaculture; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 65–132. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, L. Review on global fisheries. In Brief Introduction to Fisheries; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 19–96. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yasin, I.S.M.; Mohamad, A.; Azzam-Sayuti, M. Control of fish diseases using antibiotics and other antimicrobial agents. In Recent Advances in Aquaculture Microbial Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 127–152. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sanches-Fernandes, G.M.M.; Sá-Correia, I.; Costa, R. Vibriosis outbreaks in aquaculture: Addressing environmental and public health concerns and preventive therapies using gilthead seabream farming as a model system. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 904815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bondad-Reantaso, M.G.; MacKinnon, B.; Karunasagar, I.; Fridman, S.; Alday-Sanz, V.; Brun, E.; Le Groumellec, M.; Li, A.; Surachetpong, W.; Karunasagar, I.; et al. Review of alternatives to antibiotic use in aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 1421–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castanon, J.I.R. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in european poultry feeds. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 2466–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vijayaram, S.; Sun, Y.-Z.; Zuorro, A.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Van Doan, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H. Bioactive immunostimulants as health-promoting feed additives in aquaculture: A review. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 130, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pearlin, B.V.; Muthuvel, S.; Govidasamy, P.; Villavan, M.; Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Dhama, K.; Gopi, M. Role of acidifiers in livestock nutrition and health: A review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 558–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hajati, H. Application of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Int. Int. J. Avian Wildl. Biol. 2018, 3, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heindl, U.; Paik, I. Enzymes and Potassium diformate in animal nutrition. Proc. Korea Feed Ingred. Assoc. Conf. 2004, 5, 99–161. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ricke, S.C.; Dittoe, D.K.; Richardson, K.E. Formic acid as an antimicrobial for poultry production: A review. Front. Veter. Sci. 2020, 7, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mroz, Z.; Reese, D.E.; Øverland, M.; van Diepen, J.T.M.; Kogut, J. The effects of potassium diformate and its molecular constituents on the apparent ileal and fecal digestibility and retention of nutrients in growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yuan, X.; Wen, A.; Dong, Z.; Desta, S.T.; Shao, T. Effects of formic acid and potassium diformate on the fermentation quality, chemical composition and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage. Grass Forage Sci. 2017, 72, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, W.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Sun, D.; He, N.; Wang, Y. Optimization of green synthesis of potassium diformate and its potential as a mold inhibitor for animal feed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 5981–5985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Defoirdt, T.; Boon, N.; Sorgeloos, P.; Verstraete, W.; Bossier, P. Short-chain fatty acids and poly-β-hydroxyalkanoates: (New) Biocontrol agents for a sustainable animal production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yustiati, A.; Aminah, S.; Lili, W.; Andriani, Y.; Bioshina, I.B. Effect of using potassium diformate as a feed additive to growth rate and feed efficiency of Nirwana tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. GSD 2019, 7, 738–750. [Google Scholar]
  18. Maroccolo, S. Inclusion of a Species-Specific Probiotic or Calcium Diformate in Young Calves Diets: Effects on Gut Microbial Balance, Health Status and Growth Performance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Milan, Milano, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Siqwepu, O.; Salie, K.; Goosen, N. Evaluation of potassium diformate and potassium chloride in the diet of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus in a recirculating aquaculture system. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lückstädt, C.; Mellor, S. The use of organic acids in animal nutrition, with special focus on dietary potassium diformate under European and Austral-Asian conditions. Recent Adv. Anim. Nutr. Aust. 2011, 18, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gatlin, D.M., III; Yamamoto, F.Y. Nutritional supplements and fish health. In Fish Nutrition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 745–773. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xue, X.; Zhou, X.-Q.; Wu, P.; Jiang, W.-D.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.-N.; Feng, L. New perspective into possible mechanism in growth promotion of potassium diformate (KDF) on the juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture 2023, 576, 739850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elala, N.M.A.; Ragaa, N.M. Eubiotic effect of a dietary acidifier (potassium diformate) on the health status of cultured Oreochromis niloticus. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xun, P.; Zhou, C.; Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; Yu, W.; Yang, Y.; Li, T.; Huang, J.; Wu, Y.; Lin, H. Effects of dietary potassium diformate on growth performance, fillet quality, plasma indices, intestinal morphology and liver health of juvenile golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 24, 101110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Naderi Farsani, M.; Bahrami Gorji, S.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Rashidian, G.; Van Doan, H. Combined and singular effects of dietary PrimaLac® and potassium diformate (KDF) on growth performance and some physiological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kakavand, M.; Hosseini Shekarabi, S.P.; Shamsaie Mehrgan, M.; Islami, H.R. Potassium diformate in the diet of sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus): Zootechnical performance, humoral and skin mucosal immune responses, growth-related gene expression and intestine morphology. Aquac. Nutr. 2021, 27, 2392–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; He, S.; Shi, P.; Gao, X.; Yao, B.; Ringø, E. Effects of dietary potassium diformate (KDF) on growth performance, feed conversion and intestinal bacterial community of hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus♀× O. aureus♂). Aquaculture 2009, 291, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lückstädt, C. Effect of dietary potassium diformate on the growth and digestibility of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Fish Nutrition & Feeding, Florianopolis, Brazil, 1–5 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yustiati, A.; Nadiyah, N.A.; Suryadi, I.B.B.; Rosidah, R. Immune performances of sangkuriang catfish (Clarias gariepinus) with addition of potassium diformate on feed. World News Nat. Sci. 2019, 25, 113–129. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yustiati, A.; Kundari, D.F.; Suryana, A.H.; Suryadi, I.B.B. Effectiveness of potassium diformate addition to feed to improve immune system of Pangasius (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) that challenged by Aeromonas hydrophila. World Sci. News 2019, 134, 86–100. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nugraha, A.A.; Yustiati, A.; Bangkit, I.; Andriani, Y. Growth performance and survival rate of giant gourami fingerlings (Osphronemus goramy Lacepede, 1801) with potassium diformate addition. World Sci. News 2020, 143, 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sayah, A.B.; Mohammadian, T.; Mesbah, M.; Jalali, S.M.; Tabandeh, M.R. The effects of different levels of potassium diformate and calcium diformate on growth, digestion, antioxidant capacity, intestinal flora, stress markers, and some serum biochemical analytes in juvenile Bluga Huso huso. Res. Sq. 2023. preprint. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hussein, E.E.; Ashry, A.M.; Habiba, M.M. Effects of dietary potassium diformate (KDF) on growth performance and immunity of the sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, reared in hapas. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2020, 24, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lantu, S. Osmoregulasi pada hewan akuatik. J. Perikan. Dan Kelaut. Trop. 2010, 6, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sivakumar, M.; Amirtharaj, K.V.; Chrisolite, B.; Sivasankar, P.; Subash, P. Dietary organic acids on growth, immune response, hepatopancreatic histopathology and disease resistance in Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei against Vibrio harveyi. Res. Sq. 2022. preprint. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shah, S.Z.H.; Afzal, M.; Khan, S.Y.; Hussain, S.M.; Habib, R.Z. Prospects of using citric acid as fish feed supplement. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2015, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  37. Safari, O.; Sarkheil, M.; Shahsavani, D.; Paolucci, M. Effects of single or combined administration of dietary synbiotic and sodium propionate on humoral immunity and oxidative defense, digestive enzymes and growth performances of African cichlid (Labidochromis lividus) challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fishes 2021, 6, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Castillo, S.; Rosales, M.; Pohlenz, C.; Gatlin, D.M. Effects of organic acids on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities of juvenile red drum Sciaenops ocellatus. Aquaculture 2014, 433, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Demas, G.E.; Zysling, D.A.; Beechler, B.R.; Muehlenbein, M.P.; French, S.S. Beyond phytohaemagglutinin: Assessing vertebrate immune function across ecological contexts. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 710–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Monalisa, S.S.; Rozik, M.; Pratasik, S.B. Effectivity of Arcangelisia flava as immunostimulant to prevent streptococcosis on Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac. Aquar. Conserv. Legis. 2018, 11, 1834–1843. [Google Scholar]
  41. Neumann, N.F.; Stafford, J.L.; Barreda, D.; Ainsworth, A.; Belosevic, M. Antimicrobial mechanisms of fish phagocytes and their role in host defense. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2001, 25, 807–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vadstein, O. The use of immunostimulation in marine larviculture: Possibilities and challenges. Aquaculture 1997, 155, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suryadi, I.B.B.; Ulfa, D.N.; Yustiati, A.; Rosidah, R. The Effect of Potassium Diformate as Feed Additive on Immune Performances of Nilem (Osteochilus hasselti Valenciennes, 1842) Under Infection of Aeromonas hydrophila. Omni-Akuatika 2020, 16, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wassef, E.A.; Saleh, N.E.; Abdel-Latif, H.M. Beneficial effects of some selected feed additives for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.): A review. Int. Aquat. Res. 2023, 15, 271–288. [Google Scholar]
  45. Awan, F.; Dong, Y.; Wang, N.; Liu, J.; Ma, K.; Liu, Y. The fight for invincibility: Environmental stress response mechanisms and Aeromonas hydrophila. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Soliman, M.K.; Easa, M.E.S.; Faisal, M.; Abou-Elazm, I.M.; Hetrick, F.M. Motile aeromonas infection of striped (grey) mullet Mugil cephalus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1989, 56, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kamphues, J.; Visscher, C.; Mößeler, A.; Häbich, A.; Wolf, P. 16.1 EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNTS OF ANTIBIOTICS USED IN LIVESTOCK, FOCUSED ON YOUNG FOOD PRODUCING ANIMALS (PIGS/POULTRY). In Production Diseases in Farm Animals; Zentrum GmbH: Leipzig, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomson, J.R.; Friendship, R.M. Digestive system. In Diseases of Swine; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 234–263. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mangunwardoyo, W.; Ratih, I.; Etty, R. Pathogenicity and virulency of Aeromonas hydrophila stainer on nila fish (Oreochromis niloticus Lin.) using koch postulate. J. Ris. Akuakultur 2010, 5, 245–255. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pandey, A. Screening, Detection and Characterization of Bacterial Fish Pathogens in Coastal Region of Goa. Doctoral Dissertation, Goa University, Panaji, India, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kumar, R.; Pande, V.; Singh, L.; Sharma, L.; Saxena, N.; Thakuria, D.; Singh, A.K.; Sahoo, P.K. Pathological findings of experimental Aeromonas hydrophila infection in golden mahseer (Tor putitora). Fish. Aquac. J. 2016, 7, 2150–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El Deen, A.N.; Dorgham-Sohad, M.; Hassan-Azza, H.M.; Hakim, A.S. Studies on Aeromonas hydrophila in cultured Oreochromis niloticus at Kafr El Sheikh Governorate, Egypt with reference to histopathological alterations in some vital organs. World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  53. da Silva, B.C.; do Nascimento Vieira, F.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Ferreira, G.S.; Seiffert, W.Q. Salts of organic acids selection by multiple characteristics for marine shrimp nutrition. Aquaculture 2013, 384, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ajingi, Y.S.; Ruengvisesh, S.; Khunrae, P.; Rattanarojpong, T.; Jongruja, N. The combined effect of formic acid and Nisin on potato spoilage. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 24, 101523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ariño, J.; Ramos, J.; Sychrova, H. Monovalent cation transporters at the plasma membrane in yeasts. Yeast 2018, 36, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mulcahy, M.F. Serum protein changes associated with ulcerative dermal necrosis (UDN) in the trout Salmo trutta L. J. Fish Biol. 1971, 3, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jasim, S.A.; Altalbawy, F.M.; Alameri, A.A.; Ramírez-Coronel, A.A.; Obaid, R.F.; Al-Hamdani, M.M.; Kadhim, A.J.; Zabibah, R.S.; Alzahrani, H.A.; Farsani, S.G.; et al. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus helveticus ATC 15009 on growth performance, hematology parameters, innate immune responses, and the antioxidant status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under high rearing density. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2023, 23, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. da Silva, B.C.; Vieira, F.D.N.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Bolivar, N.; Seiffert, W.Q. Butyrate and propionate improve the growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Adams, D.; Boopathy, R. Use of formic acid to control vibriosis in shrimp aquaculture. Biologia 2013, 68, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ng, W.K.; Koh, C.B.; Sudesh, K.; Siti-Zahrah, A. Effects of dietary organic acids on growth, nutrient digestibility and gut microflora of red hybrid tilapia, Oreochromis sp., and subsequent survival during a challenge test with Streptococcus agalactiae. Aquac. Res. 2009, 40, 1490–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mine, S.; Boopathy, R. Effect of organic acids on shrimp pathogen, Vibrio harveyi. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 63, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sun, Y.; Yu, P.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Gao, T.; Zhou, R.; Li, L. The feed additive potassium diformate prevents Salmonella enterica Serovar Pullorum infection and affects intestinal flora in chickens. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lückstädt, C. Use of organic acids as feed additives—Sustainable aquaculture production the non-antibiotic way. Int Aquafeed 2006, 9, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lim, C.; Lückstädt, C.; Webster, C.D.; Kesius, P. Organic acids and their salts. In Dietary Nutrients, Additives, and Fish Health; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 305–319. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Mode of action of KDF against microorganisms. KDF is composed of potassium formate and formic acid, releasing H+ to reduce the pH in the digestive tract.
Figure 1. Mode of action of KDF against microorganisms. KDF is composed of potassium formate and formic acid, releasing H+ to reduce the pH in the digestive tract.
Fishes 09 00085 g001
Figure 2. Addition of potassium diformate to aquaculture organisms. In chemical structures, black represents carbon atoms, red represents oxygen atoms, grey signifies hydrogen atoms, and blue symbolizes potassium atoms.
Figure 2. Addition of potassium diformate to aquaculture organisms. In chemical structures, black represents carbon atoms, red represents oxygen atoms, grey signifies hydrogen atoms, and blue symbolizes potassium atoms.
Fishes 09 00085 g002
Table 1. Application of KDF in selected aquatic organisms.
Table 1. Application of KDF in selected aquatic organisms.
SpeciesDosageRoute of AdministrationInfluenceReferences
Ctenopharyngodon idella3 g/kgFeed for 70 daysEnhancing growth performance, pancreatic protease and lipase activities, lowering intestinal pH, and modulating gut microbiota.[22]
Oreochromis niloticus2–3 g/kgFeed for 60 daysEnhancing growth performance and feed efficiency, reducing intestinal pH, and enhancing immune response.[23]
Trachinotus ovatus6.58 g/kgFeed for 56 daysEnhancing growth performance, muscle elasticity, antioxidant enzyme activities, and improving intestinal morphology.[24]
Oncorhynchus mykiss12 g/kgFeed for 56 daysEnhancing growth performance, lipase, protease, and amylase activities, and reducing glucose and cortisol levels.[25]
Acipenser ruthenus8.48–8.83 g/kgFeed for 70 daysEnhancing growth performance, protein content, immunity, intestinal villus length, and width.[26]
Oreochromis niloticus ♀ × O. aureus3 g/kgFeed for 56 daysEnhancing growth performance and feed conversion efficiency, and modulating gut microbiota.[27]
Salmo salar13.5 g/kgFeed for 80 daysEnhancing growth performance and digestibility[28]
Clarias gariepinus5 g/kgFeed for 40 daysIncreasing survival rate and immunity.[29]
Pangasianodon hypophthalmus5 g/kgFeed for 14 daysEnhancing immune response and disease resistance.[30]
Osphronemus goramy3–5 g/kgFeed for 40 daysEnhancing growth performance, feed efficiency, survival rate, and reducing intestinal pH.[31]
Bluga huso1.5–2 g/kgFeed for 60 daysEnhancing growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, gene expression levels, antioxidant activity, and gut microbiota modulation.[32]
Dicentrarchus labrax2–3 g/kgFeed for 90 daysEnhancing growth performance, hemoglobin levels, and immunity.[33]
Osteochilus hasselti1–5 g/kgFeed for 56 daysEnhancing disease resistance.[34]
Litopenaeus vannamei2 g/kgFeed for 70 daysEnhancing growth performance, disease resistance, immunity, and gut microbiota modulation.[35]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; He, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Xu, J.; Zheng, P.; Xian, J.; Lu, Y. Application of Organic Acid Salts as Feed Additives in Some Aquatic Organisms: Potassium Diformate. Fishes 2024, 9, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9030085

AMA Style

Chen J, He S, Zhang Z, Li J, Zhang X, Li J, Xu J, Zheng P, Xian J, Lu Y. Application of Organic Acid Salts as Feed Additives in Some Aquatic Organisms: Potassium Diformate. Fishes. 2024; 9(3):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9030085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Junxiang, Shilong He, Zelong Zhang, Jiajun Li, Xiuxia Zhang, Juntao Li, Jiarui Xu, Peihua Zheng, Jianan Xian, and Yaopeng Lu. 2024. "Application of Organic Acid Salts as Feed Additives in Some Aquatic Organisms: Potassium Diformate" Fishes 9, no. 3: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9030085

APA Style

Chen, J., He, S., Zhang, Z., Li, J., Zhang, X., Li, J., Xu, J., Zheng, P., Xian, J., & Lu, Y. (2024). Application of Organic Acid Salts as Feed Additives in Some Aquatic Organisms: Potassium Diformate. Fishes, 9(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9030085

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop