Building a Local Multi-Marker eDNA Reference Database Reveals the Limitations of Public Repositories for Freshwater Fish Monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Morphological Identification
2.2. DNA Barcode Generation
2.3. Local Database Construction and Sequence Annotation Analysis
2.4. Phylogenetic Reconstruction and Genetic Threshold Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Overview of the Local Reference Database
3.2. Comparison of Species Coverage
3.3. Comparison of Sequence Similarity
3.4. Comparison of Annotation Accuracy
3.5. Phylogenetic and Interspecific Divergence Threshold Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. The Necessity of a Region-Specific, Multi-Marker Reference Database
4.2. Differential Performance and Complementarity of Molecular Markers
4.3. Determining and Applying Interspecific Genetic Thresholds
4.4. Implications for Conservation and Management
4.5. Study Limitations and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| TGR | Three Gorges Reservoir |
| eDNA | Environmental DNA |
| NJ | Neighbor joining |
| K2P | Kimura 2-parameter |
References
- Beng, K.C.; Corlett, R.T. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: Opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 2089–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valentini, A.; Taberlet, P.; Miaud, C.; Civade, R.; Herder, J.; Thomsen, P.F.; Bellemain, E.; Besnard, A.; Coissac, E.; Boyer, F.; et al. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 929–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Cui, G.; Zhang, B.; Yan, B.; Nie, Q. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Current applications and future prospects for freshwater fish monitoring. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 376, 124531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belle, C.C.; Stoeckle, B.C.; Geist, J. Taxonomic and geographical representation of freshwater environmental DNA research in aquatic conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2019, 29, 1996–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomsen, P.F.; Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA—An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 183, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keck, F.; Couton, M.; Altermatt, F. Navigating the seven challenges of taxonomic reference databases in metabarcoding analyses. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2023, 23, 742–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jerde, C.L.; Mahon, A.R.; Campbell, T.; McElroy, M.E.; Pin, K.; Childress, J.N.; Armstrong, M.N.; Zehnpfennig, J.R.; Kelson, S.J.; Koning, A.A.; et al. Are Genetic Reference Libraries Sufficient for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Mekong River Basin Fish? Water 2021, 13, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claver, C.; Canals, O.; de Amézaga, L.G.; Mendibil, I.; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N. An automated workflow to assess completeness and curate GenBank for environmental DNA metabarcoding: The marine fish assemblage as case study. Environ. DNA 2023, 5, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schenekar, T.; Schletterer, M.; Lecaudey, L.A.; Weiss, S.J. Reference databases, primer choice, and assay sensitivity for environmental metabarcoding: Lessons learnt from a re-evaluation of an eDNA fish assessment in the Volga headwaters. River Res. Appl. 2020, 36, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roesma, D.I.; Tjong, D.H.; Syaifullah, S.; Nofrita, N.; Janra, M.N.; Prawira, F.D.L.; Salis, V.M.; Aidil, D.R. The importance of DNA barcode reference libraries and selection primer pair in monitoring fish diversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2023, 24, 2251–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zhao, J.; Yao, M. A comprehensive and comparative evaluation of primers for metabarcoding eDNA from fish. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 1609–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Cai, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, G.; Ma, C.; Shen, Z. Preliminary construction and comparative analysis of environmental DNA metabarcoding reference database of freshwater fishes in Hainan Island. South China Fish. Sci. 2022, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Kang, M.; Shen, L.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Du, H.; Wang, C.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, Z.; et al. Rapid change in Yangtze fisheries and its implications for global freshwater ecosystem management. Fish Fish. 2020, 21, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.C.; Jiang, W. The Construction and Application of BLAST Database of DNA Barcode forCommon Fish in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Genom. Appl. Biol. 2021, 40, 1952–1960. [Google Scholar]
- Miya, M.; Sato, Y.; Fukunaga, T.; Sado, T.; Poulsen, J.Y.; Sato, K.; Minamoto, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamanaka, H.; Araki, H.; et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: Detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2015, 2, 150088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, N.T.; Olds, B.P.; Renshaw, M.A.; Turner, C.R.; Li, Y.; Jerde, C.L.; Mahon, A.R.; Pfrender, M.E.; Lamberti, G.A.; Lodge, D.M. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2016, 16, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Yan, Z.; Hänfling, B.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.; Fan, J.; Li, J. Methodology of fish eDNA and its applications in ecology and environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marques, V.; Milhau, T.; Albouy, C.; Dejean, T.; Manel, S.; Mouillot, D.; Juhel, J. GAPeDNA: Assessing and mapping global species gaps in genetic databases for eDNA metabarcoding. Divers. Distrib. 2021, 27, 1880–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigand, H.; Beermann, A.J.; Čiampor, F.; Costa, F.O.; Csabai, Z.; Duarte, S.; Geigerg, M.F.; Grabowski, M.; Rimet, F.; Rulik, B.; et al. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 678, 499–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ranaweera, J.B.S.; Fernando, T.S.P.; Weerakoon, D.K. eDNA Metabarcoding: Gaps of Publicly Available Reference Databases of Freshwater Vertebrates in Sri Lanka. Proc. Int. For. Environ. Symp. 2024, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Bu, W. Exploring Large-Scale Patterns of Genetic Variation in the COI Gene among Insecta: Implications for DNA Barcoding and Threshold-Based Species Delimitation Studies. Insects 2022, 13, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koroiva, R.; Santana, D.J. Evaluation of partial 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, COI and Cytb gene sequence datasets for potential single DNA barcode for hylids (Anura: Hylidae). An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2022, 94, e20200825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fort, A.; McHale, M.; Cascella, K.; Potin, P.; Perrineau, M.; Kerrison, P.D.; da Costa, E.; Calado, R.; Domingues, M.D.R.; Azevedo, I.C.; et al. Exhaustive reanalysis of barcode sequences from public repositories highlights ongoing misidentifications and impacts taxa diversity and distribution. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2021, 22, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stat, M.; John, J.; DiBattista, J.D.; Newman, S.J.; Bunce, M.; Harvey, E.S. Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 33, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerde, C.L.; Wilson, E.A.; Dressler, T.L. Measuring global fish species richness with eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2019, 19, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; Dewaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kochzius, M.; Seidel, C.; Antoniou, A.; Botla, S.K.; Campo, D.; Cariani, A.; Vazquez, E.G.; Hauschild, J.; Hervet, C.; Hjörleifsdottir, S.; et al. Identifying Fishes through DNA Barcodes and Microarrays. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, M.; Jayasankar, P.; Sahoo, L.; Das, P. A comparative study of COI and 16 S rRNA genes for DNA barcoding of cultivable carps in India. Mitochondrial DNA 2015, 26, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Ren, J.; Zhang, R. Identifying the Genetic Distance Threshold for Entiminae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Species Delimitation via COI Barcodes. Insects 2022, 13, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magoga, G.; Fontaneto, D.; Montagna, M. Factors affecting the efficiency of molecular species delimitation in a species-rich insect family. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2021, 21, 1475–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackman, J.M.; Benvenuto, C.; Coscia, I.; Carvalho, C.O.; Ready, J.S.; Boubli, J.P.; Magnusson, W.E.; McDevitt, A.D.; Sales, N.G. eDNA in a bottleneck: Obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems. Environ. DNA 2021, 3, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milan, D.T.; Mendes, I.S.; Damasceno, J.S.; Teixeira, D.F.; Sales, N.G.; Carvalho, D.C. New 12S metabarcoding primers for enhanced Neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity assessment. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontes, J.T.; Katoh, K.; Pires, R.; Soares, P.; Costa, F.O. Benchmarking the discrimination power of commonly used markers and amplicons in marine fish (e)DNA (meta)barcoding. Metabarcoding Metagenomics 2024, 8, e128646-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, L.; Ludwig, A.; Peng, Z. Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 8281–8294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collins, R.A.; Bakker, J.; Wangensteen, O.S.; Soto, A.Z.; Corrigan, L.; Sims, D.W.; Genner, M.J.; Mariani, S. Non-specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 1985–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doorenweerd, C.; Jose, M.S.; Leblanc, L.; Barr, N.; Geib, S.M.; Chung, A.Y.C.; Dupuis, J.R.; Ekayanti, A.; Fiegalan, E.; Hemachandra, K.S.; et al. Towards a better future for DNA barcoding: Evaluating monophyly- and distance-based species identification using COI gene fragments of Dacini fruit flies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2024, 24, e13987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Gene | Local-Only | Shared | Public-Only | Missing | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12S rRNA | 1 | 118 | 42 | 8 | 169 |
| 16S rRNA | 1 | 116 | 44 | 8 | 169 |
| COI | 1 | 118 | 42 | 8 | 169 |
| Reference Database | Target Gene | Number of Shared Species | Low-Similarity Species | Uncertain or Misannotated Species | Correctly Annotated Species | Annotation Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Database | 12S rRNA | 118 | 8 | 18 | 92 | 77.97% |
| 16S rRNA | 116 | 12 | 17 | 87 | 75.00% | |
| COI | 118 | 66 | 7 | 45 | 38.14% | |
| Local Database | 12S rRNA | 118 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 92.37% |
| 16S rRNA | 116 | 0 | 8 | 108 | 93.10% | |
| COI | 118 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 100.00% |
| Marker | Species | Pairwise Distance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12S rRNA | Culter oxycephalus | Ancherythroculter nigrocauda | 0 |
| Culter dabryi | Ancherythroculter nigrocauda | 0 | |
| Culter dabryi | Culter oxycephalus | 0 | |
| Pseudobagrus pratti | Pseudobagrus truncatus | 0 | |
| Jinshaia abbreviata | Jinshaia sinensis | 0 | |
| Glyptothorax fokiensis | Glyptothorax sinensis | 0 | |
| Discogobio brachyphysallidos | Discogobio yunnanensis | 0 | |
| Xenocypris fangi | Xenocypris argentea | 0 | |
| Gnathopogon herzensteini | Gnathopogon imberbis | 0 | |
| COI | Xenocypris fangi | Xenocypris argentea | 0 |
| Gnathopogon herzensteini | Gnathopogon imberbis | 0 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Xie, L.; Pu, Y.; Deng, H.; Tian, H.; Wang, D.; Duan, X.; Shen, Z.; Li, Y. Building a Local Multi-Marker eDNA Reference Database Reveals the Limitations of Public Repositories for Freshwater Fish Monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Fishes 2026, 11, 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050264
Xie L, Pu Y, Deng H, Tian H, Wang D, Duan X, Shen Z, Li Y. Building a Local Multi-Marker eDNA Reference Database Reveals the Limitations of Public Repositories for Freshwater Fish Monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Fishes. 2026; 11(5):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050264
Chicago/Turabian StyleXie, Lang, Yan Pu, Huatang Deng, Huiwu Tian, Dengqiang Wang, Xinbin Duan, Ziwei Shen, and Yunfeng Li. 2026. "Building a Local Multi-Marker eDNA Reference Database Reveals the Limitations of Public Repositories for Freshwater Fish Monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir" Fishes 11, no. 5: 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050264
APA StyleXie, L., Pu, Y., Deng, H., Tian, H., Wang, D., Duan, X., Shen, Z., & Li, Y. (2026). Building a Local Multi-Marker eDNA Reference Database Reveals the Limitations of Public Repositories for Freshwater Fish Monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Fishes, 11(5), 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11050264
