# Computational Dynamics of Natural Information Morphology, Discretely Continuous

^{1}

^{2}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Dichotomy—The Simplest Kind of Classification

## 3. Leibniz’s Binary Notation

“To his contemporaries, the picture must have seemed like a somewhat outrageous joke. To us it looks both prophetic and frightening, because it appears as a confirmation of the trend to think the world in terms of digital information. But Leibniz’s picture suggests that we must even go beyond thinking world in terms of digital information, for he presents the world as being the set of all digital information ([8], p. 160).”

## 4. Dualism in Physics: Discrete vs. Continuous

“There are therefore now two theories of light, both indispensable, and—as one must admit today in spite of twenty years of tremendous effort on the part of theoretical physicists—without any logical connections.”Albert Einstein [9]

## 5. The Finite (Discrete) Nature Hypothesis

“A fundamental question about time, space and the inhabitants thereof is "Are things smooth or grainy?" Some things are obviously grainy (matter, charge, angular momentum); for other things (space, time, momentum, energy) the answers are not clear. Finite Nature is the assumption that, at some scale, space and time are discrete and that the number of possible states of every finite volume of space-time is finite. In other words Finite Nature assumes that there is no thing that is smooth or continuous and that there are no infinitesimals.”(Fredkin, Finite Nature) [13] (Emphasis added)

## 6. The True Nature of the Universe: Discretely Continuous?

“(A)s we delve deeper and deeper into both natural and artificial processes, we find the nature of the process often alternates between analog and digital representations of information. As an illustration, I noted how the phenomenon of sound flips back and forth between digital and analog representations. In our brains, music is represented as the digital firing of neurons in the cochlear representing different frequency bands. In the air and in the wires leading to loudspeakers, it is an analog phenomenon. The representation of sound on a music compact disk is digital, which is interpreted by digital circuits. But the digital circuits consist of thresholded transistors, which are analog amplifiers. As amplifiers, the transistors manipulate individual electrons, which can be counted and are, therefore, digital, but at a deeper level are subject to analog quantum field equations. At a yet deeper level, Fredkin, and now Wolfram, are theorizing a digital (i.e., computational) basis to these continuous equations. It should be further noted that if someone actually does succeed in establishing such a digital theory of physics, we would then be tempted to examine what sorts of deeper mechanisms are actually implementing the computations and links of the cellular automata. Perhaps, underlying the cellular automata that run the Universe are yet more basic analog phenomena, which, like transistors, are subject to thresholds that enable them to perform digital transactions.”[21]

“In a quantum computer, there is no distinction between analog and digital computation. Quanta are by definition discrete, and their states can be mapped directly onto the states of qubits without approximation. But qubits are also continuous, because of their wave nature; their states can be continuous superpositions. Analog quantum computers and digital quantum computers are both made up of qubits, and analog quantum computations and digital quantum computations both proceed by arranging logic operations between those qubits. Our classical intuition tells us that analog computation is intrinsically continuous and digital computation is intrinsically discrete. As with many other classical intuitions, this one is incorrect when applied to quantum computation. Analog quantum computers and digital quantum computers are one and the same device.”[17]

“Digital vs. analogue is a Boolean dichotomy typical of our computational paradigm, but digital and analogue are only “modes of presentation” of being (to paraphrase Kant), that is, ways in which reality is experienced and/or conceptualized by an epistemic agent at a given level of abstraction. A preferable alternative is provided by an informational approach to structural realism, according to which knowledge of the world is knowledge of its structures.”[20]

## 7. Continuum as a Result of Interaction

## 8. Analog/Digital—Continuous/Discrete—Differentiation/Integration

“Information can be defined in terms of categorical opposition of one and many, leading to two manifestations of information, selective and structural. These manifestations of information are dual in the sense that one always is associated with the other. The dualism can be used to model and explain dynamics of information processes.”(Schroeder [30])

## 9. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Nature as a Network of Morphological Infocomputational Processes for Cognitive Agents. Eur. Phys. J.
**2017**, 226, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dodig-Crnkovic, G.; von Haugwitz, R. Reality Construction in Cognitive Agents through Processes of Info-Computation. In Representation and Reality in Humans, Other Living Organisms and Intelligent Machines; Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Giovagnoli, R., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 211–235. [Google Scholar]
- Jakobson, R.; Halle, M. Fundamentals of Language; Mouton & Co.: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1956. [Google Scholar]
- Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J.
**1948**, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gell-Mann, M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex; Freeman/Owl Book: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Von Weizsäcker, C.F. The Unity of Nature; Translation; Farrar Straus Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Wheeler, J.A. It from Bit, at Home in the Universe; American Institute of Physics: College Park, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Debrock, G. Process Pragmatism. Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution; Debrock, G., Ed.; Rodopi: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Einstein, A. The Compton Experiment. In Scientific Papers of Arthur Holly Compton, X-ray and Other Studies, Appendix 3; Shankland, R.S., Ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Bohr, N. The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature
**1928**, 121, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chalmers, A. What Is This Thing Called Science? 4th ed.; University of Queensland Press: Brisbane, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Siegelmann, H.T.; Sontag, E.D. Analog computation via neural networks. Theor. Comput. Sci.
**1994**, 131, 331–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fredkin, E. Finite Nature. In Progress in Atomic Physics, Neutrinos and Gravitation, Proceedings of the Xxviith Rencontre de Moriond, Les Arcs, Savoie, France, 25 January–1 February 1992; Chardin, G., Fackler, O., Van Thanh, J., Eds.; Editions Frontieres: Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1992; pp. 345–352. [Google Scholar]
- Denning, P. Computing is a natural science. Commun. ACM
**2007**, 50, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ballard, D. An Introduction to Natural Computation; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Ballard, D. Brain Computation as Hierarchical Abstraction, (Computational Neuroscience); The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd, S. Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos; Knopf: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Rozenberg, G.; Kari, L. The many facets of natural computing. Commun. ACM
**2008**, 51, 72–83. [Google Scholar] - Horsman, D.; Kendon, V.; Stepney, S. The Natural Science of Computing. Commun. ACM
**2017**, 60, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Floridi, L. Against digital ontology. Synthese
**2009**, 168, 151–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kurzweil, R. The Age of Spiritual Machines, When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence; Viking Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Lesne, A. The discrete versus continuous controversy in physics. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci.
**2007**, 17, 185–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wolfram, S. A New Kind of Science; Wolfram Media: Champaign, IL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Zuse, K. Calculating Space; Translation of “Rechnender Raum”; MIT Technical Translation: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Maley, C.J. Analog and digital, continuous and discrete. Philos. Stud.
**2011**, 155, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dodig-Crnkovic, G.; Stuart, S.A.J. Computation, Information, Cognition: The Nexus and the Liminal; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Investigations into Information Semantics and Ethics of Computing; Mälardalen University Press: Västerås, Sweden, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Floridi, L. A defense of informational structural realism. Synthese
**2008**, 161, 219–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Bateson, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology; Adriaans, P., van Benthem, J., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder, M.J. Dualism of Selective and Structural Manifestations of Information in Modelling of Information Dynamics. In Computing Nature; Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Giovagnoli, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 125–137. [Google Scholar]
- Tymieniecka, A.-T. Logos and Life: Creative Experience and the Critique of Reason: Introduction to the Phenomenology of Life and the Human Condition; Kluwer Academic: Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Ikere, Z. The Law of Opposites in the Ontopoiesis of Life and in Language. In Phenomenology of Space and Time, Volume 116 of the Series Analecta Husserliana pp; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L. A Praxical Solution of the Symbol Grounding Problem. Minds Mach.
**2007**, 17, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Arnellos, A.; Spyrou, T.; Darzentas, J. The Emergence of Interactive Meaning Processes in Autonomous Systems. In Proceedings of the FIS 2005: Third International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, Paris, France, 4–7 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead, A.N. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Dodig-Crnkovic, G.; Cicchetti, A. Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science; Magnani, L., Bertolotti, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Drack, M. Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s organismic view on the theory of evolution. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.)
**2015**, 324B, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Physical Computation as Dynamics of Form that Glues Everything Together. Information
**2012**, 3, 204–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

© 2017 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Dodig-Crnkovic, G.
Computational Dynamics of Natural Information Morphology, Discretely Continuous. *Philosophies* **2017**, *2*, 23.
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies2040023

**AMA Style**

Dodig-Crnkovic G.
Computational Dynamics of Natural Information Morphology, Discretely Continuous. *Philosophies*. 2017; 2(4):23.
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies2040023

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana.
2017. "Computational Dynamics of Natural Information Morphology, Discretely Continuous" *Philosophies* 2, no. 4: 23.
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies2040023