Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Evolutionary Philosophy of Science: A New Image of Science and Stance towards General Philosophy of Science
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Dynamics of Natural Information Morphology, Discretely Continuous
Previous Article in Special Issue
Philosophy of Information: Revolution in Philosophy. Towards an Informational Metaphilosophy of Science
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Philosophies 2017, 2(4), 24;

How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change?

IHPST, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1K7, Canada
Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON N6A 5B8, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 September 2017 / Revised: 22 October 2017 / Accepted: 3 November 2017 / Published: 8 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Meta-Philosophy of Science)
Full-Text   |   PDF [229 KB, uploaded 8 November 2017]


In this paper, we demonstrate how a systematic taxonomy of stances can help elucidate two classic debates of the historical turn—the Lakatos–Feyerabend debate concerning theory rejection and the Feyerabend–Kuhn debate about pluralism during normal science. We contend that Kuhn, Feyerabend, and Lakatos were often talking at cross-purposes due to the lack of an agreed upon taxonomy of stances. Specifically, we provide three distinct stances that scientists take towards theories: acceptance of a theory as the best available description of its domain, use of a theory in practical applications, and pursuit (elaboration) of a theory. We argue that in the Lakatos–Feyerabend debate, Lakatos was concerned with acceptance whereas Feyerabend was mainly concerned with pursuit. Additionally, we show how Feyerabend and Kuhn’s debate on the role of pluralism/monism in normal science involved a crucial conflation of all three stances. Finally, we outline a few general lessons concerning the process of scientific change. View Full-Text
Keywords: Feyerabend; Kuhn; Lakatos; stances; acceptance; use; pursuit Feyerabend; Kuhn; Lakatos; stances; acceptance; use; pursuit
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barseghyan, H.; Shaw, J. How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change? Philosophies 2017, 2, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Philosophies EISSN 2409-9287 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top