Next Article in Journal
Category Theory Approach to Solution Searching Based on Photoexcitation Transfer Dynamics
Next Article in Special Issue
The Unreasonable Destructiveness of Political Correctness in Philosophy
Previous Article in Journal
A New Kind of Aesthetics —The Mathematical Structure of the Aesthetic
Previous Article in Special Issue
“Political Correctness” from a “Border Reason”: Between Dignity and the Shadow of Exclusion

Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality

Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 13 A Moskovska Str., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Philosophies 2017, 2(3), 15;
Received: 16 September 2016 / Revised: 30 May 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 / Published: 4 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Correctness—Towards a Global Ethos)
Nowadays political correctness (PC) is blamed by its opponents because of a failed model of multiculturalism, an influx of migrants and the threat of terrorist acts. Obviously, a definition of tolerance given by UNESCO in 1995 has lost its meaning. In order to argue a possibility of a global ethos based on new understandings of PC, the authors refer to contemporary achievements of semiotics, hermeneutics and philosophical anthropology. We use a critical method developed in the hermeneutical tradition of P. Ricoeur, J. Kristeva, Tz. Todorov and others. Criticism is directed at (1) paradoxes of postmodern philosophical attempts for justification the idea of political correctness; (2) the way of introducing new terminology, as on a language level it leads, not to inclusion, but to exclusion, of disadvantaged people because as E. Benveniste states, the third person is rather the non-person. The conclusion is that politically correct speech should be grounded on a basis which takes into account the three persons of verb conjugation. Similar philosophical and ethical ideas can be found in works of J. Kristeva, Tz. Todorov, P. Ricoeur. An example is given for how these ideas can be implemented in the fields of film and art. This is one of the possible ways of overcoming the exclusion of disadvantaged people who are only named in politically correct terms, and not as participants, in social and political dialogue. View Full-Text
Keywords: multiculturalism; terrorism; political correctness; semiotics; hermeneutics; ethics; censorship; art multiculturalism; terrorism; political correctness; semiotics; hermeneutics; ethics; censorship; art
MDPI and ACS Style

Lichev, V.; Hristoskova, M. Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality. Philosophies 2017, 2, 15.

AMA Style

Lichev V, Hristoskova M. Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality. Philosophies. 2017; 2(3):15.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lichev, Valeri, and Miroslava Hristoskova. 2017. "Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality" Philosophies 2, no. 3: 15.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop