Next Article in Journal
Designing and Simulation Assessment of a Chair Attachment Air Blowing Methods to Enhance the Safety of Prolonged Sitting
Next Article in Special Issue
Bone Regeneration Induced by Patient-Adapted Mg Alloy-Based Scaffolds for Bone Defects: Present and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Review and Proposal for a Classification System of Soft Robots Inspired by Animal Morphology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteolytically Resistant Bioactive Peptide-Grafted Sr/Mg-Doped Hardystonite Foams: Comparison of Two Covalent Functionalization Strategies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bioconjugation of Carbohydrates to Gelatin Sponges Promoting 3D Cell Cultures

Biomimetics 2023, 8(2), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020193
by Antonietta Pepe 1,*, Antonio Laezza 1, Angela Ostuni 2, Alessandra Scelsi 1, Alessandro Laurita 3 and Brigida Bochicchio 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Biomimetics 2023, 8(2), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020193
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 28 April 2023 / Accepted: 2 May 2023 / Published: 6 May 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.

The authors should introduce the research of 4D cell culture using gelatin material. In the current version, the readers cannot understand the novelty. Therefore, in the introduction or discussion section, the authors should describe the novelty of this study by comparing it with related papers.

 

Overall (review not limited to gelatin)

Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 201016, 351–359.

Cancers 202012(10), 2754

 

Research papers

Polym. Chem., 2019, 10, 3180-3193

J. Mater. Chem. B, 2019, 7, 1064-1075

http://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0189

 

 

2.

The degradation profile of sponges should be investigated. The profile must affect the function of 3D culture.

 

3.

How about the stiffness? This property also would affect the function.

 

 

Good.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The introduction and discussion part need to improve.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is very well organized, the authors demonstrating a good approach, presenting the topic from several points of view and good concordance between the sections. However, the Introduction does not provide sufficient background, so literature is still needed.

When you present the conjugation of disaccharides to gelatin process, on line 93, specify that room temperature will be abbreviated RT in order to understand the description in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2.

Regarding 2.6. Preparation of the gelatin sponges:”, the authors described in detail the cross-linking process, but how exactly did you choose "10 ml of acetone/H2O (9:1, v/v) containing 25 mg of EDC......670 ml of ED (d=0.89 g/ml)…”?

Pay attention to the writing of the words: crosslinking or cross-linking; crosslinked or cross-linked. Keep them in the same form throughout the manuscript.

About units, use the international system of units (SI). For example, in 2.6. Preparation of the gelatin sponges:” and “2.7. Swelling test:”, the unit for time was not written correctly. Please, see Lines 134, 135, 140.

In 3.2. Characterization of GM and GL”, all FT-IR spectra are presented as absorbance spectra, but it should be specified if there are arbitrary absorbance units.

The authors need to eliminate grammatical and spelling errors.

This manuscript could be accepted after a minor revision.

The authors need to eliminate grammatical and spelling errors.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The work is well conceived, however I suggest to:

1. improve the state of the art in the introduction section

2. Figure 3 and 4 resolution must be improved

 

The work is well written, minor English editing are required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept the Manuscript.

Back to TopTop