Cherokee Dispossession Through Claimant Self-Declaration: Assessing Cherokee Heritage Claims in the 2020 U.S. Census
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Cherokee Affiliation and the U.S. Census: Context
3. Classification and Coding
Based on a telephone conversation with a statistician from the Population Division of the Racial Statistics Branch of the Census Bureau, only about 2% of responses were sent on to subsequent expert coding, so the overwhelming number of self-declared responses explicitly specify the claimed tribe or pseudo-tribal group. The groups listed as Cherokee in the accompanying data are a combination of directly submitted responses and Bureau labels based on existing data designations from prior censuses and surveys in the classification list, and this would explain the consistency of named groups across the U.S. The Bureau of the Census updated their information based on “the annual Federal Register notice entitled ‘Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs,” Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, issued by OMB, and through consultation with American Indian or Alaska Native communities and leaders” (United States Census Bureau 2023; italics added).17(1) automated coding where a write-in response is automatically coded if it matches a write-in response already contained in a database known as the “master file,” and (2) expert coding, which took place when a write-in response did not match an entry already on the master file and was sent to expert coders familiar with the subject matter. During the coding process, subject-matter specialists reviewed and coded written entries from all write-in lines available on the race question.
4. Reading Notes for Census Data
- An underline designates the three federally recognized Cherokee Native tribal nations: the Cherokee Nation, United Keetoowah Band, and Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.
- Italics indicate groups listed in either category (alone/combination) but with zero respondents to both (presumably these groups were cited in previous censuses). As a result, not all groups are listed in both categories for each state.
- Calculations: % difference determined by dividing total CN/EBCI/UKB combination figure (c) by total Cherokee generic Cherokee combination (also c). Because these are the total numbers and cited as such by U.S. census researchers themselves, the combination figures (rather than “Detailed American Indian and Alaska Native Alone” [a] figures) are most accurate for the broadest assessment of claims to Cherokee heritage in the 2020 U.S. census.
- In addition to the federally recognized Cherokee Nation, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians, and Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, the 2020 census identified the following fifteen groups as “Cherokee”:
- ○
- Cherokee (generic)
- ○
- Cher-O-Creek Intratribal Indians (state-recognized, Alabama)
- ○
- Cherokee Alabama
- ○
- Cherokee Bear Clan of South Carolina
- ○
- Cherokee of Georgia (state-recognized, Georgia)
- ○
- Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama (state-recognized, Alabama)
- ○
- Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama (state-recognized, Alabama)
- ○
- Four Winds Cherokee (state-recognized, Louisiana)
- ○
- Georgia Eastern Cherokee (state-recognized, Georgia)
- ○
- Northern Cherokee Nation of Missouri and Arkansas
- ○
- Piedmont American Indian Association—Lower Eastern Cherokee Nation SC (PAIA)
- ○
- Sac River Band of the Chickamauga-Cherokee
- ○
- Southeastern Cherokee Council
- ○
- United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation (state-recognized, Alabama)
- ○
- White River Band of the Chickamauga-Cherokee
- Many states have a group called “Southeastern Indians” that is likely the same South-Eastern Indian Nation or Southeastern Indian Nation identified by the Cherokee Nation Fraudulent Indian Task Force in 2011 (Cherokee Nation Fraudulent Indian Task Force 2008). (It is challenging to find online information about this group, given its very generic name.) As the specific affiliation is not clear in the census data, it is not included below; inclusion would not make a significant difference in overall percentage totals although it would add a few hundred to the unsubstantiated claimant category.
5. State-by-State Census Figures (Including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico)
5.1. ALABAMA
TOTAL ALABAMA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 225 (a); 734 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 7303 (a); 72,881 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 3040 (a); 6491 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 1% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Alabama.
5.2. ALASKA
TOTAL ALASKA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 107 (a); 387 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 577 (a); 4917 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 14 (a); 61 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Alaska.
5.3. ARIZONA
TOTAL ARIZONA
- Declared CN, EBCI, UKB: 408 (a); 1445 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2281 (a); 23,962 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 58 (a); 156 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Arizona.
5.4. ARKANSAS
TOTAL ARKANSAS
- Declared CN, EBCI, UKB: 963 (a); 2930 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 8117 (a); 43,107 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 81 (a); 268 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Arkansas.
5.5. CALIFORNIA
TOTAL CALIFORNIA
- Declared CN, EBCI, UKB: 1734 (a); 6866 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 13,748 (a); 126,919 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 128 (a); 717 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5.4% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in California.
5.6. COLORADO
TOTAL COLORADO
- Declared CN, EBCI, UKB: 432 (a); 1631 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 3523 (a); 29,614 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 55 (a); 181 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Colorado.
5.7. CONNECTICUT
TOTAL CONNECTICUT
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 18 (a); 148 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 363 (a); 5205 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 13 (a); 59 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Connecticut.
5.8. DELAWARE
TOTAL DELAWARE
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 10 (a); 77 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 339 (a); 3890 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 4 (a); 45 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Delaware.
5.9. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TOTAL DC
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 29 (a); 103 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 110 (a); 1379 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 10 (a); 17 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 7.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in the District of Columbia.
5.10. FLORIDA
TOTAL FLORIDA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 529 (a); 1831 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 6822 (a); 74,633 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 135 (a); 733 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Florida.
5.11. GEORGIA
TOTAL GEORGIA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 411 (a); 1560 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 4471 (a); 64,139 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 179 (a); 867 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.4% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Georgia.
5.12. HAWAI‘I
TOTAL HAWAI‘I
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 20 (a); 264 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 341 (a); 9948 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 9 (a); 18 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Hawai‘i.
5.13. IDAHO
TOTAL IDAHO
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 128 (a); 504 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 966 (a); 9585 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 5 (a); 47 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Idaho.
5.14. ILLINOIS
TOTAL ILLINOIS
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 186 (a); 990 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2565 (a); 39,211 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 25 (a); 180 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Illinois.
5.15. INDIANA
TOTAL INDIANA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 143 (a); 622 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2483 (a); 35,130 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 42 (a); 190 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 1.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Indiana.
5.16. IOWA
TOTAL IOWA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 54 (a); 256 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 536 (a); 8568 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 9 (a); 66 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Iowa.
5.17. KANSAS
TOTAL KANSAS
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 689 (a); 2364 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 4544 (a); 28,045 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 48 (a); 200 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Kansas. This number is higher than the national average, likely because southern Kansas borders the Cherokee Nation reservation and northeast Oklahoma.
5.18. KENTUCKY
TOTAL KENTUCKY
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 143 (a); 546 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2269 (a); 31,883 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 42 (a); 158 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 1.7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Louisiana.
5.19. LOUISIANA
TOTAL LOUISIANA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 135 (a); 426 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2078 (a); 15,258 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 352 (a); 744 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Louisiana.
5.20. MAINE
TOTAL MAINE
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 8 (a); 61 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 229 (a); 2249 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 11 (a); 22 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Maine.
5.21. MARYLAND
TOTAL MARYLAND
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 105 (a); 596 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 1601 (a); 21,744 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 19 (a); 141 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Maryland.
5.22. MASSACHUSETTS
TOTAL MASSACHUSETTS
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 40 (a); 249 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 560 (a); 7203 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 6 (a); 27 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3.4% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Massachusetts.
5.23. MICHIGAN
TOTAL MICHIGAN
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 167 (a); 819 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2530 (a); 35,724 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 46 (a); 237 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Michigan.
5.24. MINNESOTA
TOTAL MINNESOTA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 103 (a); 392 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 448 (a); 7615 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 10 (a); 35 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Minnesota.
5.25. MISSISSIPPI
TOTAL MISSISSIPPI
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 61 (a); 445 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2531 (a); 9483 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 26 (a); (c) 90.
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 4.6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Mississippi.
5.26. MISSOURI
TOTAL MISSOURI
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 885 (a); 2841 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 6730 (a); 57,657 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 139 (a); 514 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Missouri.
5.27. MONTANA
TOTAL MONTANA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 37 (a); 205 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 364 (a); 3967 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 8 (a); 45 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Montana.
5.28. NEBRASKA
TOTAL NEBRASKA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 59 (a); 252 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 428 (a); 5417 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 4 (a); 22 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 4.6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Nebraska.
5.29. NEVADA
TOTAL NEVADA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 142 (a); 598 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 1303 (a); 12,476 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 18 (a); 81 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 4.7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Nevada.
5.30. NEW HAMPSHIRE
TOTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 15 (a); 80 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 153 (a); 2153 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 3 (a); 17 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3.7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in New Hampshire.
5.31. NEW JERSEY
TOTAL NEW JERSEY
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 42 (a); 342 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 917 (a); 14,095 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 22 (a); 154 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.4% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in New Jersey.
5.32. NEW MEXICO
TOTAL NEW MEXICO
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 180 (a); 526 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 927 (a); 7294 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 6 (a); 55 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 7.2% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in New Mexico.
5.33. NEW YORK
TOTAL NEW YORK
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 105 (a); 683 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2296 (a); 25,949 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 81 (a); 319 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in New York State.
5.34. NORTH CAROLINA
TOTAL NORTH CAROLINA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 6453 (a); 8654 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 7773 (a); 70,118 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 77 (a); 369 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 12.3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in North Carolina. This is considerably higher than the national average, largely due to the Eastern Band reservation and core population being in the state.
5.35. NORTH DAKOTA
TOTAL NORTH DAKOTA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 35 (a); 100 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 121 (a); 1317 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 9 (a); 8 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 7.6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in North Dakota.
5.36. OHIO
TOTAL OHIO
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 223 (a); 1073 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 4234 (a); 71,469 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 64 (a); 327 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 1.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Ohio.
5.37. OKLAHOMA
TOTAL OKLAHOMA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 21,594 (a); 35,948 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 91,027 (a); 204,755 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 254 (a); 952 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 17.6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Oklahoma. This is significantly higher than the national average due to the core populations of the Cherokee Nation and United Keetoowah Band being in the state. Oklahoma is the state with the highest number of Cherokee citizens compared to non-citizen claimants, followed by North Carolina.
5.38. OREGON
TOTAL OREGON
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 427 (a); 1648 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2725 (a); 26,991 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 41 (a); 172 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 6% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Oregon.
5.39. PENNSYLVANIA
TOTAL PENNSYLVANIA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 114 (a); 706 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2162 (a); 33,516 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 26 (a); 217 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Pennsylvania.
5.40. PUERTO RICO
TOTAL PUERTO RICO
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 3 (a); 5 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 15 (a); 105 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 3 (a); 6 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 4.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Puerto Rico.
5.41. RHODE ISLAND
TOTAL RHODE ISLAND
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 12 (a); 44 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 130 (a); 1525 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 10 (a); 16 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Rhode Island.
5.42. SOUTH CAROLINA
TOTAL SOUTH CAROLINA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 216 (a); 818 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2918 (a); 32,609 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 101 (a); 336 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in South Carolina.
5.43. SOUTH DAKOTA
TOTAL SOUTH DAKOTA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 31 (a); 116 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 128 (a); 1569 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 8 (a); 14 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 14% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in South Dakota.
5.44. TENNESSEE
TOTAL TENNESSEE
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 409 (a); 1754 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 4322 (a); 60,308 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 207 (a); 583 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Tennessee.
5.45. TEXAS
TOTAL TEXAS
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 1821 (a); 6178 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 14,492 (a); 115,140 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 207 (a); 566 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5.3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Texas.
5.46. UTAH
TOTAL UTAH
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 83 (a); 392 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 582 (a); 7255 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 8 (a); 39 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5.4% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Utah.
5.47. VERMONT
TOTAL VERMONT
- Declared CN and ECBI (UKB not present in VT data): 8 (a); 37 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 119 (a); 1300 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 6 (a); 8 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 2.8% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Vermont.
5.48. VIRGINIA
TOTAL VIRGINIA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 249 (a); 1199 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2811 (a); 39,342 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 45 (a); 211 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Virginia.
5.49. WASHINGTON
TOTAL WASHINGTON
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 446 (a); 2150 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 2925 (a); 34,367 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 57 (a); 151 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 6.2% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Washington State.
5.50. WEST VIRGINIA
TOTAL WEST VIRGINIA
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 35 (a); 172 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 906 (a); 12,859 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 22 (a); 42 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 1.3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in West Virginia.
5.51. WISCONSIN
TOTAL WISCONSIN
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 53 (a); 304 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 642 (a); 9952 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 21 (a); 97 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 3% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Wisconsin.
5.52. WYOMING
TOTAL WYOMING
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB: 33 (a); 133 (c).
- Cherokee heritage claimants: 251 (a); 2676 (c).
- ○
- Individuals specifically identifying as members of non-recognized Cherokee claimant groups: 7 (a); 22 (c).
- % Difference: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee Tribal citizens (c) are roughly 5% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in Wyoming.
6. Cherokee Nation Population: State-by-State Figures 2024
| ALABAMA: 1323 | NEBRASKA: 1026 |
| ALASKA: 1576 | NEVADA: 2488 |
| ARIZONA: 7443 | NEW HAMPSHIRE: 130 |
| ARKANSAS: 19,851 | NEW JERSEY: 305 |
| CALIFORNIA: 27,972 | NEW MEXICO: 2539 |
| COLORADO: 6,944 | NEW YORK: 873 |
| CONNECTICUT: 279 | NORTH CAROLINA: 2050 |
| DELAWARE: 111 | NORTH DAKOTA: 236 |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 115 | OHIO: 1217 |
| FLORIDA: 4443 | OKLAHOMA: 283,227 |
| GEORGIA: 2456 | OREGON: 6691 |
| HAWAII: 338 | PENNSYLVANIA: 694 |
| IDAHO: 2432 | RHODE ISLAND: 75 |
| ILLINOIS: 1869 | SOUTH CAROLINA: 1040 |
| INDIANA: 1015 | SOUTH DAKOTA: 482 |
| IOWA: 771 | TENNESSEE: 2300 |
| KANSAS: 16,251 | TEXAS: 29,401 |
| KENTUCKY: 769 | UTAH: 1953 |
| LOUISIANA: 1538 | VERMONT: 77 |
| MAINE: 157 | VIRGINIA: 1891 |
| MARYLAND: 751 | WASHINGTON: 7514 |
| MASSACHUSETTS: 468 | WEST VIRGINIA: 222 |
| MICHIGAN: 1293 | WISCONSIN: 734 |
| MINNESOTA: 934 | WYOMING: 624 |
| MISSISSIPPI: 722 | Outside of USA/NO ADDRESS: 2356 |
| MISSOURI: 13,314 | |
| MONTANA: 921 | TOTAL 8/21/2024 CHEROKEE NATION POPULATION: 466,181 |
7. Preliminary Data Analysis
- Number of U.S. states and enumerated territories in which Cherokees are the most commonly declared American Indian and Alaska Native heritage: 35 (including District of Columbia), or roughly 69%.
- Declared CN, ECBI, UKB in the 2020 U.S. census (c): 93,204.
- Unconfirmed/unrecognized Cherokee heritage claimants across the U.S. (c): 1,568,473.
- ○
- Total claimants identifying as members of non-federally recognized “Cherokee” groups on census: 5808 (a); 17,063 (c).
- ○
- States with the largest numbers of non-federally recognized “Cherokee” claimant group members: Alabama, Oklahoma, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Florida, California, Tennessee, Texas.
- Nationwide % difference average: According to 2020 self-reported U.S. census data, total declared Cherokee tribal citizens (c) were roughly 7% of the number of non-citizen Cherokee heritage claimants in the United States.
8. Initial Implications and Future Research Directions
9. Closing Comments
In recent decades a well-funded anti-Indian movement, primarily driven by the religious political right, has mobilized expressly to dismantle tribal sovereignty. This movement uses various strategies with one key argument: American Indian people are unconstitutionally given special rights based on their race, violating the Constitution’s equal protection clause, which prohibits discrimination based on race.
Cherokees have always insisted on our distinctiveness as Cherokees; not as a measure of racial difference or quaint ethnic color, not as individual assertions of difference but as separate political, legal, and social orders recognized by international law and made manifest in persistent nation-to-nation relations with the U.S. federal government and other Indigenous polities. That distinctiveness is inherent in our sovereignty as collectively self-determining nations. To conflate the two or, worse, to subsume Cherokee sovereignty into settler categories of American ethnic difference is both contrary to actual Cherokee culture and history and a betrayal of the political commitments and material sacrifices of generations of our people working to ensure our tribes’ continuity into the future in spite of American attempts to eliminate our nationhood as much as our populations.As the movement has grown it has become an existential threat to tribal communities still struggling to survive the onslaught of four hundred years of colonial invasion. A core strategy is to drive legal cases to the U.S. Supreme Court, a dangerous venue for litigating Indian rights in the past few decades, given the court’s track record of eroding tribal rights and its current demographic makeup.23
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
| 1 | Gilio-Whitaker, Who Gets to Be Indian, pp. xvi–xvii. |
| 2 | The homeland of all Cherokees is originally in the southeastern U.S., current-day Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, and the Carolinas, with broader influence across Kentucky and West Virginia. In the first decades of the nineteenth century, some Cherokees were encouraged by U.S. agents to emigrate west to what is now Arkansas; in 1838, the U.S. dispossessed the majority of the Cherokee population through the act of ethnic cleansing known as Indian Removal, relocating most survivors to what is now eastern Oklahoma. This is why today two of the Cherokee tribes are in Oklahoma and only one remains in our ancient homeland. That process of dispossession is often cited in claimant stories as if Cherokees did not know or keep track of their kin during those traumatic events, though extensive documentary evidence demonstrates otherwise. |
| 3 | Schor, Counting Americans, p. 2. |
| 4 | Circe Sturm is an anthropologist at the University of Texas at Austin who has published widely on Cherokee identity and false claims to Cherokee heritage, yet her work has come under sharp public scrutiny since 2024, when questions about her own longstanding claims to unsubstantiated Mississippi Choctaw (and Cherokee) heritage were exposed. See https://tribalallianceagainstfrauds.org/circe-dawn-sturm (accessed on 12 February 2025). Sturm’s quantitative data cited here were compiled in collaboration with Cherokee Nation staff and remain the most accessible resources available, so I use them, though not without reluctance; I do not, however, draw extensively on her qualitative analysis for the reasons noted above. Dina Gilio-Witaker recently noted the particular challenge accompanying the use of this data given Sturm’s omnipresence in these discussions: “Sturm’s research has been central to all scholars working in American Indian identity studies… The revelations [about her heritage claims] are deeply unsettling to our academic community and have eroded the trust of longstanding colleagues and friends” (p. 187). |
| 5 | Thornton, “Who Counts?” p. 151; see also Bennett, “Racial Categories Used in the Decennial Censuses,” p. 173. |
| 6 | On pretendians, see Leroux, Distorted Descent; for dodgy DNA claims, see TallBear, Native American DNA. |
| 7 | In the case of Cherokee Nation, this is the Final Dawes Roll for the Cherokee Nation. The United Keetoowah Band uses either the Dawes Roll or the 1949 UKB base roll. The Eastern Band uses the 1924 Baker Roll. |
| 8 | While blood quantum restrictions can pose a challenge for some descendants in navigating citizenship provisions, they are not always insurmountable. For example, because both the Cherokee Nation and United Keetoowah Band use the Dawes Roll, those UKB descendants with a blood quantum beneath the UKB threshold are able to enroll in the Cherokee Nation. The Eastern Band has a formal confirmed descendancy status for those descendants under the blood quantum minimum but with verifiable ancestry. In each case, however, descendants are still required to verify their relationship to ancestors on the nations’ respective base rolls. |
| 9 | Ross Mulcare and Gene Norris, personal communications, 13 April 2023, 6 February 2024, and 11 November 2025. |
| 10 | According to Tuck and Yang, “Settler moves to innocence are those strategies or positionings that attempt to relieve the settler of feelings of guilt or responsibility without giving up land or power or privilege, without having to change much at all.” The claimant assumption of Cherokee heritage aligns with the first of the moves they discuss, “Settler nativism,” wherein “settlers locate or invent a long-lost ancestor who is rumored to have had ‘Indian blood,’ and they use this claim to mark themselves as blameless in the attempted eradications of Indigenous peoples” (p. 10). |
| 11 | For context and elaboration, see Cornsilk, “An Open Letter to Defenders of Andrea Smith”; Day, “No, you are not part Cherokee”; Hilleary, “Going ‘Native’”; Smithers, “Why Do So Many Americans Think They Have Cherokee Blood?”; and Viren, “The Native Scholar Who Wasn’t.” Sturm’s 2010 book Becoming Indian offers extensive commentary on these matters, but as noted above, analysis should be approached with caution given the TAAF report findings about her own heritage claims and questions arising about her research. |
| 12 | Thornton, The Cherokees, pp. 131, 139. Thornton draws on various sources to assess tribal citizenship numbers in the interregnum, including multiple records from the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Department of the Interior. |
| 13 | Sturm’s aforementioned Becoming Indian offers some useful analysis of these phenomena, but it positions legal, historical, and culturally distinctive tribal nations as having comparable narrative legitimacy with the manufactured settler story-making of Indian hobby groups. Aaron Kushner’s Cherokee Nation Citizenship is a more useful recent contribution to these discussions, though with a narrower focus on citizenship. Gilio-Whitaker offers important insights into these diverse motivations as well in Who Gets to Be Indian? |
| 14 | Cherokee Nation Fraud Wannabe List, 2008, archival document courtesy of Task Force member Dr. Cara Cowan Watts, shared to the Digadatseli’i Cherokee Scholars listserv. |
| 15 | United States Census Bureau, 2020 Census Detailed Demographic and Housing Characteristics, B-4, 5. |
| 16 | Sturm, Becoming Indian, pp. 193–203. |
| 17 | See note 15 above. |
| 18 | Ibid, A-7. |
| 19 | Chavez, “CN citizen population,” https://www.cherokeephoenix.org/news/map-shows-cn-citizen-population-for-each-state/article_066ff0b8-0df3-536e-ab04-dead9dd33925.html (accessed on 29 August 2018). |
| 20 | Kaur, “For many tribal nations, the pandemic also brought an increase in population,” https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/12/us/tribal-nations-pandemic-enrollment-increase-trnd/index.html (accessed on 12 June 2021). |
| 21 | Dunham, “Tangled Roots,” 1:4. |
| 22 | Carter, “The Other Blackfoot,” https://saponitown.com/other-blackfoot/, accessed 11 August 2024; Welburn, “Who Are the Southeastern Blackfoot?” Both these resources are presented as evidentiary for these nebulous heritage claims by unverified Native heritage claimants and should be approached with care. |
| 23 | Gilio-Whitaker, Who Gets to Be Indian, p. xvi. |
References
- Adams, Mikaëla M. 2016. Who Belongs? Race, Resources, and Tribal Citizenship in the Native South. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, Chris. 2024. Ghost in the Machine: Possessive Selves, Inert Kinship, and the Potential Whiteness of ‘Genealogical’ Indigeneity. Genealogy 8: 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, Claudette. 2020. Racial Categories Used in the Decennial Censuses, 1790 to the Present. Government Information Quarterly 17: 161–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, Linda. n.d.The Other Blackfoot: Enigmatic Blackfoot Identifications East of the Mississippi and the Piedmont Siouan of Virginia and North Carolina. Searching for Saponitown: Native American Genealogy Research from the Piedmont of NC & VA. Available online: https://saponitown.com/other-blackfoot/ (accessed on 31 October 2025).
- Chavez, Will. 2018. Map Shows CN Citizen Population for Each State. Cherokee Phoenix. Available online: https://www.cherokeephoenix.org/news/map-shows-cn-citizen-population-for-each-state/article_066ff0b8-0df3-536e-ab04-dead9dd33925.html (accessed on 29 August 2018).
- Cherokee Nation Fraudulent Indian Task Force. 2008. Cherokee Nation Fraud Wannabe List. [Google Scholar]
- Cornsilk, David. 2018. An Open Letter to Defenders of Andrea Smith: Clearing Up Misconceptions about Cherokee Identification. Indian Country Today, September 12. Available online: https://ictnews.org/archive/an-open-letter-to-defenders-of-andrea-smith-clearing-up-misconceptions-about-cherokee-identification/ (accessed on 12 September 2018)First published 2015.
- Day, Meagan. 2016. No, You Are Not Part Cherokee: Why Tribal Family Lore Is So Common Among White People from Oklahoma to Georgia. Timeline, July 5. [Google Scholar]
- Deloria, Philip J. 1998. Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Dunham, Kemba J. 1999. Tangled Roots: A Black Obsession With an Indian Tribe—Many Claim a Long Kinship to the Blackfoot Nation, Despite Lacking Evidence. Wall Street Journal 1: 4. [Google Scholar]
- Garroutte, Eva Marie. 2003. Real Indians: Identity and the Survival of Native America. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- Gilio-Whitaker, Gina. 2025. Who Gets to Be Indian: Ethnic Fraud, Disenrollment, and Other Difficult Conversations about Native American Identity. Boston: Beacon Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hilleary, Cecily. 2018. Going ‘Native’: Why Are Americans Hijacking Cherokee Identity. VOA, July 23. Available online: https://www.voanews.com/a/going-native-why-are-americans-hiijacking-cherokee-identity/4495119.html (accessed on 23 July 2018).
- How the Native American Population Changed Since the Last Census. 2021. USAFacts. Updated February 17. Available online: https://usafacts.org/articles/how-the-native-american-population-changed-since-the-last-census/ (accessed on 22 November 2021).
- Kaur, Harmeet. 2021. For Many Tribal Nations, the Pandemic Also Brought an Increase in Population. CNN.com, June 12. Available online: https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/12/us/tribal-nations-pandemic-enrollment-increase-trnd/index.html (accessed on 12 June 2021).
- Kushner, Aaron. 2025. Cherokee Nation Citizenship: A Political History. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. [Google Scholar]
- Leroux, Darryl. 2018. Distorted Descent: White Claims to Indigenous Identity. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press. [Google Scholar]
- Miles, Tiya, and Sharron Holland, eds. 2006. Crossing Waters, Crossing Worlds: The African Diaspora in Indian Country. Durham: Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Mulcare, Ross, and Gene Norris. 2023. e-mail message to author. April 13. [Google Scholar]
- Naylor, Celia E. 2008. African Cherokees in Indian Territory: From Chattel to Citizens. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, Alaina E. 2021. I’ve Been Here All the While: Black Freedom on Native Land. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
- Schor, Paul. 2017. Counting Americans: How the U.S. Census Classified the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Smithers, Gregory D. 2015. Why Do So Many Americans Think They Have Cherokee Blood? The History of a Myth. Slate, October 1. Available online: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/10/cherokee-blood-why-do-so-many-americans-believe-they-have-cherokee-ancestry.html (accessed on 1 October 2015).
- Sturm, Circe. 2010. Becoming Indian: The Struggle over Cherokee Identity in the Twenty-First Century. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press. [Google Scholar]
- TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
- Thornton, Russell. 1990. The Cherokees: A Population History. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [Google Scholar]
- Thornton, Russell. 2017. Who Counts? Indians and the U.S. Census. In The Great Vanishing Act: Blood Quantum and the Future of Native Nations. Edited by Kathleen Ratteree and Norbert Hill. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing, pp. 142–58. [Google Scholar]
- Tribal Alliance Against Frauds. 2025. Circe Dawn Sturm. News Release and Report. Available online: https://tribalallianceagainstfrauds.org/circe-dawn-sturm (accessed on 12 February 2025).
- Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1: 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Viren, Sarah. 2021. The Native Scholar Who Wasn’t. The New York Times Magazine, May 25. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/25/magazine/cherokee-native-american-andrea-smith.html (accessed on 25 May 2021).
- Welburn, Ron. 2001. Who Are the Southeastern Blackfoot? In Roanoke and Wampum: Topics in Native American Heritage and Literatures. New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Justice, D.H. Cherokee Dispossession Through Claimant Self-Declaration: Assessing Cherokee Heritage Claims in the 2020 U.S. Census. Genealogy 2025, 9, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9040131
Justice DH. Cherokee Dispossession Through Claimant Self-Declaration: Assessing Cherokee Heritage Claims in the 2020 U.S. Census. Genealogy. 2025; 9(4):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9040131
Chicago/Turabian StyleJustice, Daniel Heath. 2025. "Cherokee Dispossession Through Claimant Self-Declaration: Assessing Cherokee Heritage Claims in the 2020 U.S. Census" Genealogy 9, no. 4: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9040131
APA StyleJustice, D. H. (2025). Cherokee Dispossession Through Claimant Self-Declaration: Assessing Cherokee Heritage Claims in the 2020 U.S. Census. Genealogy, 9(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9040131