Peer-Review Record
Perceptually Optimal Color Representation of Fully Polarimetric SAR Imagery
J. Imaging 2022, 8(3), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030067
Reviewer 1:
Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Anonymous
J. Imaging 2022, 8(3), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030067
Submission received: 30 January 2022
/
Revised: 1 March 2022
/
Accepted: 4 March 2022
/
Published: 7 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Color Imaging)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
See the attachment
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
- The abstract logic is chaotic and the cohesion is not smooth. Such as “the first one is a fusion procedure”, “the second procedure”, “this two-phase procedure”.
- The full text uses a large number of long sentences, resulting in poor readability of the paper.
- The equation is part of the sentence, and punctuation should be added at the end of the equations.
- There are still grammatical errors in the text, such as section 1 should be changed to Section 2, etc.
- There are problems in the layout of the full text pictures and tables, such as the use of unclear screenshots in the pictures, the layout of the table beyond the boundary, the layout of Table 4 and Figure 8 overlapping, and so on.
- There are too few references. It is recommended to cite more recent research results in the past three years.
- My main concern is that compared with existing SAR color representation methods, the proposed method is competitive, but compared with the state-of-the-art methods in the past three years, the competitiveness of the proposed method is uncertain. Therefore, it is necessary to suggest adding the results of recent years to evaluate the performance of the proposed method.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Thanks for your response. My concerns are all addressed. I recommend acceptance of this manuscript.
