Next Article in Journal
Explainable Two-Stage Xception-Swin Transformer Learning for Body-Part-Aware Fracture Detection in Musculoskeletal X-Rays
Previous Article in Journal
Probabilistic Camera Distortion Correction Using Deep Gaussian Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
YoLeTooth: A Unified Framework for Joint Tooth Segmentation and Periapical Lesion Detection in Panoramic Radiographs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models

Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano (Human-Tech), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Imaging 2026, 12(7), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070297
Submission received: 1 May 2026 / Revised: 26 June 2026 / Accepted: 28 June 2026 / Published: 2 July 2026

Abstract

Cell segmentation plays a key role in a wide range of biomedical imaging applications, from single-cell analysis to pathology assessment. While classical deep learning architectures such as U-Net, StarDist, and HoVer-Net have set strong baselines, their reliance on domain-specific training limits generalization across diverse microscopy modalities. The emergence of foundation models, particularly the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and its derivatives, has introduced a paradigm shift toward more universal and adaptable segmentation frameworks. In this review, we summarize key advances in microscopy cell segmentation, highlighting both traditional methods and recent foundation model-based approaches. Beyond surveying the literature, we present an experimental comparison of four representative models—our proposed YOLO-SAM, along with CellSAM, Cellpose-SAM, and StarDist—tested on both fluorescence and brightfield microscopy spanning diverse cell populations and shapes. Our findings illustrate trade-offs between accuracy, robustness, and adaptability, with foundation-based models showing particular promise for cross-domain performance. By combining a comprehensive review with systematic benchmarking, this work provides practical guidance for researchers and outlines current challenges and future opportunities in developing robust, generalizable cell segmentation methods for microscopy.
Keywords: deep learning; microscopy; cell segmentation; foundation models; machine learning; instance segmentation deep learning; microscopy; cell segmentation; foundation models; machine learning; instance segmentation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martí-Pérez, D.; Naranjo, V.; Colomer, A. Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models. J. Imaging 2026, 12, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070297

AMA Style

Martí-Pérez D, Naranjo V, Colomer A. Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models. Journal of Imaging. 2026; 12(7):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martí-Pérez, Diego, Valery Naranjo, and Adrián Colomer. 2026. "Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models" Journal of Imaging 12, no. 7: 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070297

APA Style

Martí-Pérez, D., Naranjo, V., & Colomer, A. (2026). Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models. Journal of Imaging, 12(7), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12070297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop