Next Article in Journal
Secondary Use of Retired Lithium-Ion Traction Batteries: A Review of Health Assessment, Interface Technology, and Supply Chain Management
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Chemo-Mechanical Yielding and Eigenstrains in Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of C-Rate, Float Charging and Temperature on Pouch Lithium-Ion Battery Swelling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

From Waste to Cathode: A Comparative Evaluation of Sol–Gel and Co-Precipitation Routes for Closed-Loop Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes

by
Alexandra Kosenko
*,
Konstantin Pushnitsa
,
Pavel Novikov
and
Anatoliy A. Popovich
REC “Structural and Functional Materials”, Institute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg 195221, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Batteries 2025, 11(12), 466; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11120466
Submission received: 22 October 2025 / Revised: 12 December 2025 / Accepted: 16 December 2025 / Published: 18 December 2025

Abstract

The exponential growth of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicles and energy storage systems has amplified the urgent need for sustainable recycling strategies. Conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods for LIB recycling are energy-intensive, chemically demanding, and fail to preserve the structural integrity of cath-ode materials. Closed-loop recycling, in contrast, enables the recovery of layered oxides with minimal processing steps, reducing environmental footprint and supporting a circular economy. This study provides a systematic comparison of two regeneration approaches—sol–gel synthesis and hydroxide co-precipitation—for closed-loop recycling of layered NCM (LiNixCoyMnzO2) cathode materials recovered from spent LIBs. Spent cells were mechani-cally processed and leached using malic acid to recover Ni, Co, Mn, which were subsequently used to synthesize NCM622 cathode powders. The regenerated materials were characterized using SEM/EDX, XRD, and electrochemical testing in CR2032 coin cells. Both methods successfully produced phase-pure layered oxides with the R-3m structure, with distinct differences in structural ordering and electrochemical behavior. The sol–gel-derived NCM622 displayed higher crystallinity and reduced cation mixing, evidenced by an I(003)/I(104) ratio of 1.896 compared to 1.720 for the co-precipitated sample, and delivered a high initial discharge capacity of 170 mAh/g at 0.1 C. However, it exhibited significant capacity fade, retaining only 60 mAh/g after 40 cycles. In contrast, the co-precipitation route produced hierarchical porous spherical agglomerates that offered superior cycling stability, maintaining ~150 mAh/g after 40 cycles with lower polarization (ΔEp = 0.16 V). Both materials demonstrated electrochemical performance comparable to commercial NCM. Overall, hydroxide co-precipitation emerged as the most industrially viable method due to scalable processing, compositional robustness, and improved long-term stability of regenerated cathodes. This work highlights the critical influence of synthesis route selection in LIB closed-loop recycling and provides a technological framework for industrial recovery of high-value NCM cathode materials.
Keywords: lithium-ion batteries; cathode recycling; sol–gel; co-precipitation; NCM lithium-ion batteries; cathode recycling; sol–gel; co-precipitation; NCM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosenko, A.; Pushnitsa, K.; Novikov, P.; Popovich, A.A. From Waste to Cathode: A Comparative Evaluation of Sol–Gel and Co-Precipitation Routes for Closed-Loop Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Batteries 2025, 11, 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11120466

AMA Style

Kosenko A, Pushnitsa K, Novikov P, Popovich AA. From Waste to Cathode: A Comparative Evaluation of Sol–Gel and Co-Precipitation Routes for Closed-Loop Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Batteries. 2025; 11(12):466. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11120466

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosenko, Alexandra, Konstantin Pushnitsa, Pavel Novikov, and Anatoliy A. Popovich. 2025. "From Waste to Cathode: A Comparative Evaluation of Sol–Gel and Co-Precipitation Routes for Closed-Loop Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes" Batteries 11, no. 12: 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11120466

APA Style

Kosenko, A., Pushnitsa, K., Novikov, P., & Popovich, A. A. (2025). From Waste to Cathode: A Comparative Evaluation of Sol–Gel and Co-Precipitation Routes for Closed-Loop Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Batteries, 11(12), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11120466

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop