Next Article in Journal
RVE1, DBB1b, and COL2 Transcription Factors Are Responsive to Combined Stress by UV-B Radiation and Cold in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum)
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Genetic Variability within a Collection of Cumin Genotypes Using RAPD, ISSR, SRAP and SCoT Markers and Variability of In Vitro Callus Induced Therefrom
Previous Article in Journal
Reproductive Behavior of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Relative to Different Host Plants in an Intensive Tomato Crop Region of Chile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization, Population Structure Analysis, and Association Mapping of Turkish Parsley Genotypes Using iPBS Markers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the RsSWEET Gene Family and Functional Analysis of RsSWEET17 in Root Growth and Development in Radish

1
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOAR, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(6), 698; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060698
Submission received: 30 May 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 11 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023

Abstract

:
SWEET (Sugars Will Eventually be Exported Transporter) genes play essential roles in various biological processes, including phloem loading, sugar efflux, plant development and stress response. In this study, a total of 33 RsSWEET gene members were identified in the radish genome. They could be divided into four subfamilies and are distributed on eight radish chromosomes. Cis-acting regulatory element analysis indicated that these RsSWEET genes were potentially involved in the radish growth and development and stress response process, including circadian control and light response and responses to numerous stresses, including low-temperature and drought stress. Transcriptome data analysis revealed that a number of RsSWEET genes exhibited specific expression patterns in different tissues and developmental stages of radish. Moreover, several RsSWEET genes (e.g., RsSWEET2a, RsSWEET3a, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17) showed differential expression profiles under various abiotic stresses, including cold, heat, salt, Cd and Pb stress. Remarkably, the RsSWEET17 was specifically expressed in the cambium of radish. RsSWEET17 was heterologously expressed in yeast strain EBY.VW4000, which suggested that it has the ability to transport sugar. Notably, RsSWEET17-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants exhibited excessive root length, greater fresh weight and higher soluble sugar content (SSC) accumulation compared with wild-type (WT) plants, indicating that RsSWEET17 might positively regulate radish taproot development by strategically manipulating sugar accumulation. Collectively, these results clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying RsSWEET-mediated sugar accumulation and root growth and development in radish.

1. Introduction

Sugars are a crucial primary energy and carbon source for plant growth and development [1,2]. In plants, sugars are synthesized during photosynthesis in leaves or other source organs and then transported via the phloem to various sink tissues and organs such as roots, shoots and seeds [3,4]. Sugars are loaded via the symplastic pathway for transport in the phloem [5], and sugar transport requires sugar transporter proteins [6]. Three eukaryotic sugar transporter families have been extensively proven to act as sugar/H+ symporters and play critical roles in sugar translocation and distribution, which significantly determine crop yield and quality [7,8,9].
Sucrose transporters (SUTs), belonging to the major facilitator superfamily, play pivotal roles in mediating the long-distance sucrose transport from source to sink [10,11]. Monosaccharide transport is mainly mediated by MST transporter proteins [12]. SWEETs are a family of sugar efflux transporters that greatly facilitate the diffusion of sugars across intracellular or plasma membranes [13,14]. SWEET genes have been retrieved from a variety of plants, including Arabidopsis [15], Brassica rapa [16], tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [17] and rice [18]. Structural analysis revealed that the SWEET proteins in eukaryotes harbor two MtN3/saliva domains, and the SWEET gene family in plants could be classified into four clades [15,19]. Further studies revealed that SWEET genes greatly affect the transportation, metabolism and storage of carbohydrates in plants [20,21]. AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are the key players of sucrose efflux [6], and AtSWEET17 regulates the sugar content in roots and leaves [22,23]. Overexpression of SlSWEET1a and PuSWEET15 leads to increased soluble sugar content in tomato and pear, respectively [19,24]. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that SWEET genes are also involved in the response to environmental stress, including heat, cold and salt stress [15,25,26,27]. OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET15 are involved in maintaining sugar homeostasis under high-salinity stress in rice [28]. Overexpression of MdSWEET16 enhanced cold tolerance by increasing sugar accumulation in apples [29]. These results indicate that SWEET genes play a crucial role in plant growth as well as various abiotic responses in plants.
Radish (Raphanus sativus) is an economically important root vegetable with high nutritional value [30]. The taproot makes up an essential part of the edible radish. The accumulation of carbohydrates is beneficial for taproot development. Carbon assimilates are products of photosynthesis and are transported to sink organs to support plant development [31]. SWEETs play crucial roles in multiple processes, including carbohydrate transportation and plant growth and development [6]. It is feasible to improve taproot development through genetic manipulation of the SWEET gene involved in sucrose allocation. Therefore, the comprehensive identification and functional analysis of SWEET genes is of great importance for exploring the genetic and molecular basis of excellent traits in plants. Although the molecular characterization of SWEETs has been investigated in several plant species, the systematic identification and molecular function analysis of SWEET genes remains largely unexplored in radish. In this study, we mainly focused on the identification of all RsSWEET genes from the radish genome, while exploring the phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, conserved domains and cis-acting elements of the RsSWEET gene family in radish. In addition, the expression profiles of RsSWEET genes were investigated in different tissues and developmental stages, and the differential expression of eight RsSWEET genes (RsSWEET2a, RsSWEET3a, RsSWEET11a/b, RsSWEET12a/b, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17) was assessed under various abiotic stresses with RT-qPCR analysis. Furthermore, the potential roles of RsSWEET17 in sugar accumulation and taproot development were investigated in yeast and radish. The findings provide insights into the molecular basis underlying the involvement of RsSWEET genes in taproot development and stress response in radish plants and facilitate genetic improvement of vital horticulture traits in breeding programs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of SWEET Genes in Radish

The sequences of radish SWEET proteins were downloaded from the ‘NAU-LB’ radish genome (Bioproject number: PRJCA011486) [30]. To confirm the predicted genes, the seed sequence (PF03083, http://pfam.xfam.org/; accessed on 15 December 2022) with the MtN3/saliva domain was searched against the radish genome using HMMER 3.0 and the BLASTP program with an E-value set to 0.01 [32,33]. Each sequence was submitted to Pfam (http://pfam-legacy.xfam.org/; accessed on 20 December 2022) and SMART (https://smart.embl.de/; accessed on 25 December 2022) for further verification.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Gene Structure Analyses of the RsSWEET Genes

The SWEET protein sequence of Arabidopsis was downloaded from TAIR10 (https://www.arabidopsis.org/; accessed on 5 January 2023). The SWEET protein sequence of Brassica rapa was obtained from the BRAD database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/; accessed on 5 January 2023). MUSCLE was used to perform multiple alignments of the full-length SWEET protein sequences of A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus with default parameters. Subsequently, the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 via the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the Poisson model [34,35]. The collinearity analysis of SWEET genes between A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus was performed using the MCScanX and TBtools v1.120 [36]. In addition, RsSWEET genes were mapped to eight chromosomes using TBtools v1.120 software based on the corresponding location parameters in the NAU-LB radish genome [30]. The Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/; accessed on 10 February 2023) was used to analyze the gene structure [37]. The MEME tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme/doc/meme.html; accessed on 20 February 2023) was employed to identify conserved motifs [38].

2.3. Promoter Cis-Element Analysis of RsSWEETs

The PlantCARE (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/; accessed on 8 March 2023) database was used to identify potential cis-elements in the promoter sequences of RsSWEET genes (1.5 kb upstream of the translation start site) [39]; the promoter sequences were obtained from the NAU-LB radish genome.

2.4. Plant Materials and Treatments

The radish inbred line ‘NAU-XBC’ was employed in this study. The germinated seeds were sown in soil with 14 h light (25 °C) and 10 h dark (16 °C). Radish plants in the taproot-thickening period were selected for stress treatment. For cold treatment, radish plants were treated at 4 °C for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 7 days. For heat stress, radish plants were treated at 40 °C for 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h. For salt stress, these plants were treated with 250 mM NaCl for 0 h, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Radish was irrigated with CdCl2 (Cd, 50 μM) and Pb(NO3)2 (Pb, 100 μM) stress at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 7 days. Root samples were collected after various stress treatments and stored at −80 °C for use.
The 35S::RsSWEET17 fusion plasmid constructs were transferred into Arabidopsis plants with the floral dip method [30]. The positive transgenic T1 seedlings were screened to generate the T3 transgenic lines which were further utilized for the phenotypic analyses.

2.5. Expression Profile Analysis of RsSWEET Genes

Previous RNA-seq data were retrieved to analyze the expression level of the RsSWEET genes in four different tissues (leaf, root, pistil and stamen) (BioProject number: PRJCA011507, National Genomics Date Center) [30] and in three tissues (Ca: cambium, Co: cortex, Pa: parenchyma) and stages (5/7/9 weeks) of radish taproot (GenBank: PRJNA475856) [40]. The expression level of RsSWEETs was displayed by the RPKM value, and the heat map was generated using TBtools v1.120 software.

2.6. Functional Complementation Analyses in Yeast

The CDS sequence of RsSWEET17 was fused on the pDR196 vector to produce the pDR196-RsSWEET17 fusion expression vectors. Then, the plasmids of pDR196 and pDR196-RsSWEET17 were transferred into EBY.VW4000 yeast [41], employing the lithium acetate method [2]. The pDR196 vector was used as a control. EBY.VW4000 belongs to the group of hexose-deficient yeast, which can only grow on a medium with maltose as the sole carbon source. Transformants were grown on SD/- Ura solid medium with 2% maltose for 3 days. For function assays, single yeast cells were grown in SD/- Ura liquid medium overnight. Then, the yeast was adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 and then diluted with 10×, 100× and 1000×. In total, 4 µL diluent was plated on SD/- Ura solid media with 2% maltose (as control), 2% glucose, 2% fructose, 2% mannose or 2% galactose. The culture plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days. The primers are listed in Table S4.

2.7. Soluble Sugar Determination

Soluble sugars were extracted and determined as described previously [30]. In brief, after growing WT and transgenic Arabidopsis plants on MS solid medium for 20 days, 0.2 g fresh weight was ground after being frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were dissolved in 1.5 mL extraction solution (80% ethanol) for 30 min (80 °C). The content of soluble sugars was analyzed with UPLC [33,42]. The total sugar contents contain sucrose, glucose and fructose content.

2.8. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR

The total RNA of each sample was extracted and cDNA was synthesized according to the reported method [30]. The expression levels of RsSWEETs were examined in response to various stresses by qRT-PCR on a LightCycler 480 System (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The relative expression ratio was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, and the RsActin gene was selected as an internal control [43]. All primers for RT-qPCR analysis are shown in Table S3.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software (SPSS 20.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance. All values are represented as mean ± standard error (SE).

3. Results

3.1. Identification, Phylogenetic and Collinearity Analysis of RsSWEETs in Radish

In this study, 33 SWEET proteins were identified from the radish genome and were named RsSWEET1 to RsSWEET17 according to the similarity to these SWEET proteins in Arabidopsis (Table S1). According to the classification of Arabidopsis, the RsSWEET gene family can be divided into four subfamilies, AI, AII, AIII and BI. In addition, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by aligning 33, 17 and 30 SWEET proteins from R. sativus, A. thaliana and B. rapa, respectively, further verifying the phylogenetic relationships and classification of RsSWEET proteins (Figure 1, Table S1). Briefly, 13 of the 33 RsSWEET genes (39.39%) belonged to the BI subfamily, which was the most common member of the radish SWEET family. There were 10, 3 and 7 RsSWEETs belonging to the subfamilies AI, AII and AIII, accounting for 33.33%, 9.09% and 21.21% of the total RsSWEETs, respectively. Subsequently, multiple alignments for SWEET protein sequences of A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus revealed that RsSWEET contained the characteristic MtN3/saliva domain (Figure S1).
To further explore the collinearity analysis of SWEET genes, the syntenic map was constructed based on the collinearity relationships among R. sativus, A. thaliana and B. rapa genomes (Figure 2, Table S2). The results showed that there were 69 syntenic orthologous gene pairs between 33 RsSWEETs and 30 BrSWEETs. Of these, 13 RsSWEETs have 3 corresponding orthologous genes in B. rapa, such as RsSWEET3a/RsSWEET3b/RsSWEET3c-BrSWEET3, indicating these genes had a common ancestor. Additionally, 30 RsSWEETs have a syntenic relationship with 15 AtSWEET orthologous gene pairs between R. sativus and A. thaliana. Most RsSWEET genes had a single corresponding orthologous AtSWEET gene. The results indicated that a proportion of RsSWEET genes have more homologous genes in B. rapa than in A. thaliana.

3.2. Chromosomal Distribution of RsSWEET Proteins in Radish

In total, 33 RsSWEET genes were distributed on 8 chromosomes of radish. In general, the distribution of these RsSWEET genes on chromosomes was relatively scattered (Figure 3). Among them, more than half of the genes were distributed on the chromosomes Chr4, Chr6 and Chr9, which contained six genes. There were four members located on each of the chromosomes Chr2, Chr3 and Chr5, whereas chromosome Chr8 harbored two members. Only one gene was found on chromosome Chr1. No RsSWEET genes were detected on Chr7. In addition, two pairs of genes (RsSWEET11a/b and RsSWEET5b/d) on the chromosome were tightly linked.

3.3. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Distribution of RsSWEETs

To further investigate the structural features of RsSWEET genes, the intron–exon structure was displayed (Figure 4A,B). The gene structure of the same branch members of the SWEET gene family was similar, except for the difference in exon and intron length. Overall, 27 members (51.6%) contained 6 exons, 3 members (19.35%) contained 5 exons and 2 members (9.68%) contained 4 exons. Moreover, there were seven exons in RsSWEET16a. Eleven putative conserved motifs in all 33 RsSWEET proteins were predicted using the MEME program (Figure 4C). The results revealed that members in the same subfamily contained similar motifs, suggesting that each subfamily protein probably exerts similar functions. Motifs 1, 3 and 5 were distributed in all proteins, indicating that these motifs were highly conserved. Nevertheless, several motifs were only presented in some specific subfamilies; for instance, motif 9 was observed in AI and BI subfamilies, and motif 10 was only present in AIII, whereas motifs 7 and 8 were only detected in BI subfamilies.

3.4. The Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements in RsSWEET Gene Promoters

The transcriptional regulation of RsSWEETs was analyzed using the PlantCARE server. In this study, a variety of CREs in the RsSWEET gene promoters were associated with light response, including ACE, G-box, GA-motif, GT1-motif and MRE, indicating that the RsSWEETs may be regulated by light and participate in photosynthesis. In addition, the top ten elements related to various stresses and hormone responses were identified in the promoter of RsSWEETs (Figure 5 and Table S3), such as the low-temperature response element (LTR), the heat shock element (HSE), ABA response (ABRE), salicylic acid (TCA-element) and auxin (TGA-element). Moreover, some elements related to growth and development, including meristem expression (CAT-box) and endosperm expression (GCN4-motif), were identified in RsSWEET5a, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17. The cis-acting element distribution and numbers of RsSWEETs varied significantly. For instance, the promoter sequence of RsSWEET11b and RsSWEET12a has a higher number of stress-responsive cis-elements, while RsSWEET5d and RsSWEET16b carried a higher number of hormone response-related cis-elements. It could be suggested that SWEET genes contain various elements which play a vital role in plant development and stress response.

3.5. Differential Expression Analysis of RsSWEET Genes

To investigate the expression levels of RsSWEET genes, their gene expression profiles in four different tissues and three development stages were determined (Figure 6). The results showed that RsSWEETs exhibited tissue- or developmental stage-specific expression varying in the course of development in radishes. Overall, RsSWEET11b, RsSWEET12a/b and RsSWEET13b in the BI group were highly expressed in leaves, while RsSWEET13b, RsSWEET14a/c and RsSWEET15a/b were highly expressed in stamens. Similarly, RsSWEET4b, RsSWEET5b/c/d and RsSWEET8 in AI showed a high expression level in stamens but were rarely expressed in roots. Moreover, there was a slight difference in expression between AII and AIII members except for RsSWEET3a in roots. Interestingly, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17 were highly expressed in roots but were hardly expressed in other tissues, suggesting that these genes might be root-specific and play important roles in root growth (Figure 6A).
The expression patterns of RsSWEET genes varied at different developmental stages of the radish taproot (Figure 6B). Generally, the expression of BI genes was stable in the cambium, cortex and parenchyma but not high, except RsSWEET11a/b, RsSWEET12a/b, RsSWEET14c and RsSWEET15a. In the subfamilies AI and AIII, RsSWEET1b, RsSWEET2a/b and RsSWEET4a/b showed a high expression level in the cambium region at 7 weeks of radish growth. Meanwhile, the RsSWEET3a/c exhibited a high value in the parenchyma region at 9 weeks of radish growth. Additionally, RsSWEET17 in AII is specifically expressed in the cambium region and changes with the development stages of radish, suggesting it might play a crucial role in regulating cambium activities and improvement of taproot yield.

3.6. Expression Profiles of RsSWEET Genes under Abiotic Stress in Radish

Total eight RsSWEETs (RsSWEET2a, RsSWEET3a, RsSWEET11a/b, RsSWEET12a/b, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17) were highly expressed in the cambium regions of radish taproot, indicating that they might play an important role in source–sink carbohydrate partitioning and organ development. To investigate the dynamic expression patterns of RsSWEET genes under various abiotic stresses in radish, these eight RsSWEETs were selected for RT-qPCR assays. Some SWEET genes, such as RsSWEET2a, RsSWEET3a, RsSWEET11b, RsSWEET12a and RsSWEET17, were induced by cold stress and reached a maximum level at 12 h (Figure 7A). The gene expression level of RsSWEET2a and RsSWEET3a reached a maximum level at 7 days, suggesting that they might be greatly involved in response to long-term cold stress. RsSWEET11b exhibited upregulation in expression under short-term cold stress. Meanwhile, these RsSWEET genes, excluding RsSWEET11b, were also induced under heat stress (Figure 7B). The RsSWEET3a and RsSWEET11b genes responded preferentially to heat stress compared to RsSWEET2a and RsSWEET11a/b, while RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17 were strongly involved in long-term heat stress. Consistently, relative to untreated radish plants, these RsSWEET genes also were induced under salt, Cd and Pb stress (Figure S2). Collectively, the RsSWEET17 gene exhibited a high expression level in radish taproot and was triggered under abiotic stress, indicating a positive pleiotropic effect on the taproot growth and response to stresses. The RsSWEET17 gene was further investigated as a candidate gene for radish taproot development.

3.7. Sugar Transport Activity of RsSWEET7 in Yeast

To investigate the sugar transport ability of RsSWEET17, the fusion vector pDR196-RsSWEET17 was expressed in the cells of yeast strain EBY.VW4000. As shown in Figure 8, compared with the pDR196 vector transformant, the yeast transformant of RsSWEET17 showed recovery in media containing only glucose, fructose, galactose or mannose. This result indicated that the deficiency of hexose uptake can be supplemented by RsSWEET17 in yeast.

3.8. Overexpression of RsSWEET17 Improves Root Sugar Accumulation and Root Growth

To further identify the role of RsSWEET17 in sugar accumulation, transgenic T3 Arabidopsis plants overexpressing RsSWEET17 (RsSWEET17-OE#9 and RsSWEET17-OE#12) were generated (Figure 9A). It was obvious that the transgenic lines overexpressing RsSWEET17 had much-improved root growth compared with the WT plants in the MS solid medium for 20 days (Figure 9A). The RsSWEET17 gene exhibited higher expression in the roots and leaves of two independent T3 transgenic lines (Figure 9B). The root length of OE#9 and OE#12 transgenic plants was 1.24- and 1.22-fold greater than that of the WT plants, respectively (Figure 9C). The fresh weight of OE#9 and OE#12 transgenic plants was greater than that of WT plants (Figure 9D). Furthermore, the total soluble sugar content (TSSC) of the T3 transgenic lines was higher than that of WT plants (Figure 9E). In particular, for two independent T3 transgenic lines, the sucrose (Suc) content and the glucose (Glc) increased by 1.5–1.6 and 2.6–2.7 fold, respectively, while fructose (Fru) changed slightly compared to the wild plants.

4. Discussion

4.1. Characterization of the RsSWEET Gene Family in Radish

Although the SWEET gene family has been systematically investigated in several plant species [15,16,44,45,46], a systematic analysis of the SWEET gene family is still lacking in radish. In this study, 33 putative SWEET genes were identified in the radish genome. The phylogenetic relationship indicated that most RsSWEETs were more similar to BrSWEETs than AtSWEETs, which is explained by the fact that A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus belong to the Brassicaceae family [6]. In addition, the number of SWEET genes in radish was significantly higher than that in Arabidopsis [15], rice [18], pear [45] and B. oleracea [47], indicating that several RsSWEET genes might have experienced whole-genome duplication (WGD) events in the evolutionary process in radish. RsSWEET7 (RsSWEET7a, RsSWEET7b and RsSWEET7c) had three orthologous genes in B. rapa, while two RsSWEET1 genes (RsSWEET1a and RsSWEET1b) had an orthologous relationship with AtRsSWEET1. The results indicated that the WGD might be a vital driving force that greatly contributed to the expansion of the SWEET gene family in radish [16,19]. Moreover, the number of SWEET gene members ordered into Clade BI was larger than that in the other three clades, suggesting that Clade III might have been extensively expanded during genome evolution to adapt to the environment and its own metabolism. Furthermore, RsSWEET11a/b and RsSWEET14a/b in Type BI contain more exons than RsSWEET5a/b in Type AI, indicating that variation in the exon–intron structure might play a significant role in the evolution of RsSWEET gene families [48,49], accounting for the diversification in gene structure.

4.2. Potential Roles of RsSWEET Genes in Various Stress Responses and Plant Growth and Development

SWEET is an important functional protein responsible for plant growth and development as well as adaptation to environmental stresses [16,23,50,51]. Comprehensive gene expression analysis of the RsSWEET genes has revealed that the expression patterns were distinct in different tissues of Arabidopsis [15], rice [18] and B. rapa [16]. In this study, RsSWEET4b and RsSWEET5b were abundant in the stamen, and their functions might be similar to those of BrSWEET4a and BrSWEET5c, which play a crucial role in anther development [16]. RsSWEET11b and RsSWEET12a/b were highly expressed in leaves, and these three genes were grouped in the same subfamily with AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12. Research indicated that AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 played a vital role in sucrose efflux in the leaf [6]. It can be deduced that RsSWEET11b and RsSWEET12a/b may contribute to the efflux of sucrose from the leaf and transport to the root and other tissues to improve plant growth and development. The atsweet11/atsweet12 double mutants showed root growth reduction [52]. RsSWEET2b, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17 were strongly enriched in radish roots, indicating they might significantly function in root development and yield improvement.
In addition, the SWEET genes were reported to be involved in the response to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity and cold in plants [22,53,54]. AtSWEET1 and AtSWEET2 were induced in Arabidopsis, and OsSWEET7c and OsSWEET15 were regulated in rice under salt stress [28]. Overexpression of DsSWEET17 in Arabidopsis could improve salt tolerance [55]. It was shown that plants control osmotic and intercellular turgor to adapt to various stress conditions by regulating the direction and transport rate of soluble sugars [23]. In this study, RsSWEET (2a, 3a, 12a, 17) genes were induced to reach the maximum expression level at 12 h of cold stress, while RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET12b reached the highest expression level at 7 days. Under heat stress, the maximum expression level of RsSWEET3a and RsSWEET11b occurred at 8 h, while RsSWEET2a and RsSWEET12a were upregulated and reached the highest expression level at 12 h. The results revealed that most RsSWEETs could be responses to multiple stresses and play a strategically manipulating role in the course of different stresses.

4.3. RsSWEET17 Positively Regulates Sugar Accumulation and Root Growth in Radish

SWEET genes as sugar transporters are involved in the transportation of sugars such as sucrose, glucose and fructose [6,52,56]. It was revealed that soluble sugar was effectively regulated by the SWEETs to determine yield and improve root development in various crops, such as tomato [4], rice [5] and Arabidopsis [57]. In this study, consistent with the results of A. thaliana [52] and cucumber [2], sugar transport activity analysis revealed that RsSWEET17 supported the uptake of hexoses. RsSWEET17 might be involved in intracellular hexose homeostasis and contribute to sink strength. In addition, a previous study revealed that a DsSWEET17-overexpression transgenic line exhibited longer roots and greater fresh weight compared to the wild type in Arabidopsis [57]. The SWEET17 gene is mainly expressed in vascular tissue and meristem cells of the root tip, which is involved in lateral root development in Arabidopsis plants [23]. The cambium mediates the process of root thickening, which strongly plays an essential role in the yield of root crops [40,58]. In the current study, RsSWEET17 was found to be highly abundant in roots and specifically expressed in the cambium regions of the radish taproot. In addition, RsSWEET17-overexpression Arabidopsis plants showed longer roots, higher fresh weight and increased soluble sugar content. It could be concluded that RsSWEET17 might affect the thickening of radish taproot by improving soluble sugar-mediated cambium activity.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a total of 33 RsSWEET genes distributed on 8 chromosomes were firstly identified from the radish genome. Expression profiling analysis indicated that a majority of RsSWEET genes exhibited tissue-specific expression in radish. Moreover, several RsSWEET genes (e.g., RsSWEET2a, RsSWEET3a, RsSWEET16b and RsSWEET17) exhibited dramatically differential expression profiles under various stresses, including cold, heat, salt, Cd and Pb stress. Notably, RsSWEET17 was highly expressed in cambium regions of radish taproot, and it was found to have the ability to transport sugar. Further transformation analysis indicated that the RsSWEET17 positively regulated the root length and fresh weight by enhancing the soluble sugar content in Arabidopsis plants. These results could provide a solid foundation for dissecting the molecular regulatory networks of RsSWEET-mediated sugar accumulation and plant development and stress responses in radish.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae9060698/s1, Figure S1: Multiple alignments for SWEET protein sequences of A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus. Figure S2: RT-qPCR expression profiles of RsSWEET genes under salt, Cd and Pb stress. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks above bar indicate a statistically significant difference using two-sided Student’s t-test (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001); Table S1: The name and amino acid sequence of SWEETs in A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus; Table S2: The orthologous gene pairs of SWEET genes among R. sativus, A. thaliana and B. rapa genomes; Table S3: Type and number of element responsive to phytohormone and stresse in the upstream regions of RsSWEET genes; Table S4: The primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L. and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z. and Y.C.; methodology, X.Z. and Y.C.; software, X.Z. and R.X.; writing—review and editing, L.X., Y.W., L.W., Y.M. and L.L.; project administration, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Jiangsu Seed Industry Revitalization Project (JBGS(2021)071), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172579), the Jiangsu Agricultural S&T Innovation Fund (CX (2022) 3369), the earmarked fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS (2023)) and the Guidance Foundation of the Hainan Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University (NAUSY-MS02).

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The radish genomic data can be found here: [https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/browse/PRJCA011486]. The RNA-seq data can be found here: [https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=&q=PRJCA011507], [GenBank: PRJNA475856].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Walmsley, A.R.; Barrett, M.P.; Bringaud, F.; Gould, G.W. Sugar transporters from bacteria, parasites and mammals: Structure-activity relationships. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1988, 23, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yao, L.; Ding, C.; Hao, X.; Zeng, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, L. CsSWEET1a and CsSWEET17 mediate growth and freezing tolerance by promoting sugar transport across the plasma membrane. Plant. Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1669–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ruan, Y.L. Sucrose metabolism: Gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2014, 65, 33–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ko, H.Y.; Ho, L.H.; Neuhaus, H.E.; Guo, W.J. Transporter SlSWEET15 unloads sucrose from phloem and seed coat for fruit and seed development in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2230–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Turgeon, R. The role of phloem loading reconsidered. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1817–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Qu, X.; Hou, B.; Sosso, D.; Osorio, S.; Fernie, A.R.; Frommer, W.B. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 2012, 335, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, L.Q.; Lin, I.W.; Qu, X.Q.; Sosso, D.; McFarlane, H.E.; Londoño, A.; Samuels, A.L.; Frommer, W.B. A cascade of sequentially expressed sucrose transporters in the seed coat and endosperm provides nutrition for the Arabidopsis embryo. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ji, J.; Yang, L.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhuang, M.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y. Plant SWEET family of sugar transporters: Structure, evolution and biological functions. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abelenda, J.A.; Bergonzi, S.; Oortwijn, M.; Sonnewald, S.; Du, M.; Visser, R.G.F.; Sonnewald, U.; Bachem, C.W.B. Source-Sink regulation is mediated by interaction of an FT homolog with a SWEET Protein in Potato. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liesche, J. Sucrose transporters and plasmodesmal regulation in passive phloem loading. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, L.; Sui, X.; Lucas, W.J.; Li, Y.; Feng, S.; Ma, S.; Fan, J.; Gao, L.; Zhang, Z. Down-regulation of the sucrose transporter CsSUT1 causes male sterility by altering carbohydrate supply. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 986–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Slewinski, T.L. Diverse functional roles of monosaccharide transporters and their homologs in vascular plants: A physiological perspective. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 641–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eom, J.S.; Chen, L.Q.; Sosso, D.; Julius, B.T.; Lin, I.W.; Qu, X.Q.; Braun, D.M.; Frommer, W.B. SWEETs, transporters for intracellular and intercellular sugar translocation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Anjali, A.; Fatima, U.; Manu, M.S.; Ramasamy, S.; Senthil-Kumar, M. Structure and regulation of SWEET transporters in plants: An update. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, L.Q.; Hou, B.H.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.Q.; Guo, W.J.; Kim, J.G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miao, L.; Lv, Y.; Kong, L.; Chen, Q.; Chen, C.; Li, J.; Zeng, F.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Huang, L.; et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, evolution, and expression patterns of MtN3/saliva/SWEET genes and functional analysis of BcNS in Brassica rapa. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, C.Y.; Han, J.X.; Han, X.X.; Jiang, J. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family in tomato. Gene 2015, 573, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sosso, D.; Luo, D.; Li, Q.; Sasse, J.; Yang, J.; Gendrot, G.; Suzuki, M.; Koch, K.E.; Mccarty, D.R.; Chourey, P.S.; et al. Seed filling in domesticated maize and rice depends on SWEET-mediated hexose transport. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, D.M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Ni, D.A.; Bai, L.; Qin, Q.P. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family in daylily (Hemerocallis fulva) and functional analysis of HfSWEET17 in response to cold stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.Y.; Guo, W.; Li, J.C.; Yue, P.T.; Bu, H.D.; Jiang, J.; Liu, W.T.; Xu, Y.X.; Yuan, H.; Li, T.; et al. Histone Acetylation at the promoter for the transcription factor PuWRKY31 affects sucrose accumulation in Pear Fruit. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 2035–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, Y.; Li, M.; Guo, S.; Sun, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, G.; He, H.; Tian, S.; Yu, Y.; et al. evolutionary gain of oligosaccharide hydrolysis and sugar transport enhanced carbohydrate partitioning in sweet watermelon fruits. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1554–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chardon, F.; Bedu, M.; Calenge, F.; Klemens, P.A.; Spinner, L.; Clement, G.; Chietera, G.; Léran, S.; Ferrand, M.; Lacombe, B.; et al. Leaf fructose content is controlled by the vacuolar transporter SWEET17 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Valifard, M.; Le Hir, R.; Müller, J.; Scheuring, D.; Neuhaus, H.E.; Pommerrenig, B. Vacuolar fructose transporter SWEET17 is critical for root development and drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2716–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shammai, A.; Petreikov, M.; Yeselson, Y.; Faigenboim, A.; Moy-Komemi, M.; Cohen, S.; Cohen, D.; Besaulov, E.; Efrati, A.; Houminer, N.; et al. Natural genetic variation for expression of a SWEET transporter among wild species of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) determines the hexose composition of ripening tomato fruit. Plant J. 2018, 96, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Asai, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, I. Increased expression of the tomato SlSWEET15 gene during grey mold infection and the possible involvement of the sugar effux to apoplasm in the disease susceptibility. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 7, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, A.; Ma, H.; Feng, S.; Gong, S.; Wang, J. DsSWEET17, a Tonoplast-Localized Sugar Transporter from dianthus spiculifolius, affects sugar metabolism and confers multiple stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.; Niu, K.; Ma, H. Identification and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family from Poa pratensis under abiotic stresses. DNA Cell Biol. 2020, 39, 1606–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mathan, J.; Singh, A.; Ranjan, A. Sucrose transport in response to drought and salt stress involves ABA-mediated induction of OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET15 in rice. Physiol. Plantarum. 2020, 171, 620–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, G.; Xu, H.; Zou, Q.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, S.; Fang, H.; Wang, Y.; Su, M.; Wang, N.; Chen, X. The vacuolar membrane sucrose transporter MdSWEET16 plays essential roles in the cold tolerance of apple. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2019, 140, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Tang, M.J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, K.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, X.L.; He, Q.; et al. A chromosome-level genome assembly of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) reveals insights into genome adaptation and differential bolting regulation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 990–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hoang, N.V.; Park, C.; Kamran, M.; Lee, J.Y. Gene regulatory network guided investigations and engineering of storage root development in root crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, X.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Xin, R.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide identification of sucrose transporter genes and functional analysis of RsSUC1b in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, B.; Jin, J.P.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.C.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jian, H.; Lu, K.; Yang, B.; Wang, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, A.; Wang, J.; Liu, L.; Qu, C.; Li, J. Genome-Wide analysis and expression profiling of the SUC and SWEET gene families of sucrose transporters in Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoang, N.V.; Choe, G.; Zheng, Y.; Aliaga Fandino, A.C.; Sung, I.; Hur, J.; Kamran, M.; Park, C.; Kim, H.; Ahn, H.; et al. Identification of conserved gene-regulatory networks that integrate environmental sensing and growth in the root cambium. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 2887–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wieczorke, R.; Krampe, S.; Weierstall, T.; Freidel, K.; Hollenberg, C.P.; Boles, E. Concurrent knock-out of at least 20 transporter genes is required to block uptake of hexoses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1999, 464, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kang, J.N.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, S.M.; Won, S.Y.; Seo, M.S.; Kwon, S.J. Analysis of phenotypic characteristics and sucrose metabolism in the roots of Raphanus sativus L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 716782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Gong, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L. Evaluation of reference genes for gene expression studies in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) using quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 424, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hu, X.; Li, S.; Lin, X.; Fang, H.; Shi, Y.; Grierson, D.; Chen, K. Transcription factor CitERF16 is involved in citrus fruit sucrose accumulation by activating CitSWEET11d. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 809619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, J.; Qin, M.; Qiao, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J. A newinsight into the evolution and functional divergence of SWEET transporters in Chinese White Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Patil, G.; Valliyodan, B.; Deshmukh, R.; Prince, S.; Nicander, B.; Zhao, M.; Sonah, H.; Song, L.; Lin, L.; Chaudhary, J.; et al. Soybean (Glycine max) SWEET gene family: Insights through comparative genomics, transcriptome profiling and whole genome resequence analysis. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Yu, F.; Tang, J.; Shan, X.; Bao, K.; Yu, L.; Wang, H.; Fei, Z.; Li, J. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of SWEET genes in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) reveal their roles in chilling and clubroot disease responses. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Cheung, L.S.; Fan, C.; Chen, L.Q.; Xu, S.; Perry, K.; Frommer, W.B.; Feng, L. Structures of bacterial homologues of SWEET transporters in two distinct conformations. Nature 2014, 515, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, L.; Frommer, W.B. Structure and function of SemiSWEET and SWEET sugar transporters. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015, 40, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lemoine, R.; La Camera, S.; Atanassova, R.; Dédaldéchamp, F.; Allario, T.; Pourtau, N.; Bonnemain, J.L.; Laloi, M.; Coutos-Thévenot, P.; Maurousset, L.; et al. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Baker, R.F.; Leach, K.A.; Braun, D.M. SWEET as sugar: New sucrose effluxers in plants. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 766–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Le Hir, R.; Spinner, L.; Klemens, P.A.W.; Chakraborti, D.; de Marco, F.; Vilaine, F.; Wolff, N.; Lemoine, R.; Porcheron, B.; Gery, C.; et al. Disruption of the sugar transporters AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 affects vascular development and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1687–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Kumar, V.; Xu, X.F.; Yuan, P.; Zhu, X.F.; Li, T.Y.; Jia, B.; Xuan, Y.H. Genome-wide identification of the SWEET gene family in wheat. Gene 2018, 642, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chong, J.; Piron, M.C.; Meyer, S.; Merdinoglu, D.; Bertsch, C.; Mestre, P. The SWEET family of sugar transporters in grapevine: VvSWEET4 is involved in the interaction with Botrytis cinerea. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6589–6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, A.; Liu, E.; Ma, H.; Feng, S.; Gong, S.; Wang, J. NaCl-induced expression of AtVHA-c5 gene in the roots plays a role in response of Arabidopsis to salt stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guo, W.J.; Nagy, R.; Chen, H.Y.; Pfrunder, S.; Yu, Y.C.; Santelia, D.; Frommer, W.B.; Martinoia, E. SWEET17, a facilitative transporter, mediates fructose transport across the tonoplast of Arabidopsis roots and leaves. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, Z.; Wei, X.; Tong, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Tang, L.; Shu, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, Y.; et al. The OsNAC23-Tre6P-SnRK1a feed-forward loop regulates sugar homeostasis and grain yield in rice. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 706–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dong, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, K.; Ying, J.; He, Q.; Liu, L. RsCLE22a regulates taproot growth through an auxin signaling-related pathway in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 233–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of SWEET proteins from A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus. Subfamilies are marked in different colors. At: A. thaliana, Br: B. rapa, Rs: R. sativus.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of SWEET proteins from A. thaliana, B. rapa and R. sativus. Subfamilies are marked in different colors. At: A. thaliana, Br: B. rapa, Rs: R. sativus.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g001
Figure 2. The collinearity analysis of SWEET genes among R. sativus, A. thaliana and B. rapa. The gray line indicates the collinearity among all genes in the genomes, and the blue line indicates the SWEET gene pairs.
Figure 2. The collinearity analysis of SWEET genes among R. sativus, A. thaliana and B. rapa. The gray line indicates the collinearity among all genes in the genomes, and the blue line indicates the SWEET gene pairs.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g002
Figure 3. The chromosomal localization of the RsSWEET family members in the radish genome.
Figure 3. The chromosomal localization of the RsSWEET family members in the radish genome.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g003
Figure 4. The analysis of RsSWEET protein and gene structure. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of RsSWEET protein. Different colors represent different subfamilies of RsSWEET gene family. (B) Gene structure of RsSWEET genes. (C) Conserved motifs of RsSWEET proteins.
Figure 4. The analysis of RsSWEET protein and gene structure. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of RsSWEET protein. Different colors represent different subfamilies of RsSWEET gene family. (B) Gene structure of RsSWEET genes. (C) Conserved motifs of RsSWEET proteins.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g004
Figure 5. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions of the RsSWEET genes. The different colored boxes represent different cis-regulatory elements.
Figure 5. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions of the RsSWEET genes. The different colored boxes represent different cis-regulatory elements.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g005
Figure 6. Expression profile analysis of RsSWEETs in different tissues and stages of radish plants. (A) The expression profiles of RsSWEETs in four tissues (root, leaf, pistil and stamen). (B) A heat map of RsSWEET expression in three tissues (Ca, cambium; Co, cortex; Pa, parenchyma) at three growth stages (W, weeks). The log2 (FPKM) value was used for the expression level of RsSWEETs.
Figure 6. Expression profile analysis of RsSWEETs in different tissues and stages of radish plants. (A) The expression profiles of RsSWEETs in four tissues (root, leaf, pistil and stamen). (B) A heat map of RsSWEET expression in three tissues (Ca, cambium; Co, cortex; Pa, parenchyma) at three growth stages (W, weeks). The log2 (FPKM) value was used for the expression level of RsSWEETs.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g006
Figure 7. RT-qPCR expression analysis of RsSWEET genes under cold and heat stresses. Treatment time (h, hour; d, day). (A) For cold treatment, radish plants were treated at 4 °C for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 7 days. (B) For heat stress, radish plants were treated at 40 °C for 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h. The asterisks above bars indicate a statistically significant difference with Student’s t-test (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 7. RT-qPCR expression analysis of RsSWEET genes under cold and heat stresses. Treatment time (h, hour; d, day). (A) For cold treatment, radish plants were treated at 4 °C for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 7 days. (B) For heat stress, radish plants were treated at 40 °C for 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h. The asterisks above bars indicate a statistically significant difference with Student’s t-test (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Horticulturae 09 00698 g007
Figure 8. Sugar transport activity analysis of RsSWEET17 in EBY.VW4000 yeast cells. Transformants were grown on SD/- Ura solid medium containing 2% maltose, glucose, fructose, galactose or mannose independently for 3 days.
Figure 8. Sugar transport activity analysis of RsSWEET17 in EBY.VW4000 yeast cells. Transformants were grown on SD/- Ura solid medium containing 2% maltose, glucose, fructose, galactose or mannose independently for 3 days.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g008
Figure 9. Overexpression of RsSWEET17 gene improves the growth and development of Arabidopsis plants. (A) Phenotypes of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants under MS medium for 20 days. The red dot represents the root tip of Arabidopsis plants. (B) Expression profile of the RsSWEET17 gene in the leaves and roots of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants as determined by RT-qPCR; data are mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Root length of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). (D) Plant fresh weight of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). (E) The content of total soluble total sugar (TSSC), sucrose (Suc), glucose (Glc) and fructose (flu) in OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 9. Overexpression of RsSWEET17 gene improves the growth and development of Arabidopsis plants. (A) Phenotypes of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants under MS medium for 20 days. The red dot represents the root tip of Arabidopsis plants. (B) Expression profile of the RsSWEET17 gene in the leaves and roots of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants as determined by RT-qPCR; data are mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Root length of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). (D) Plant fresh weight of OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). (E) The content of total soluble total sugar (TSSC), sucrose (Suc), glucose (Glc) and fructose (flu) in OE-RsSWEET17 and WT plants; data are mean ± SD (n = 4). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Horticulturae 09 00698 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Xin, R.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Ma, Y.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide Identification of the RsSWEET Gene Family and Functional Analysis of RsSWEET17 in Root Growth and Development in Radish. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060698

AMA Style

Zhang X, Cao Y, Xin R, Xu L, Wang Y, Wang L, Ma Y, Liu L. Genome-Wide Identification of the RsSWEET Gene Family and Functional Analysis of RsSWEET17 in Root Growth and Development in Radish. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(6):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060698

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoli, Yang Cao, Ruixian Xin, Liang Xu, Yan Wang, Lun Wang, Yinbo Ma, and Liwang Liu. 2023. "Genome-Wide Identification of the RsSWEET Gene Family and Functional Analysis of RsSWEET17 in Root Growth and Development in Radish" Horticulturae 9, no. 6: 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060698

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop