Next Article in Journal
Survey of the Influences of Microbial Biostimulants on Horticultural Crops: Case Studies and Successful Paradigms
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Regulation of Ascorbic Acid Accumulation and Metabolism in Lettuce
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Irrigation with Contaminated Water on Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation in Water Chestnut (Trapa natans L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of the SiLEA5 Gene in Saussurea involucrata Increases the Low-Temperature Tolerance of Transgenic Tomatoes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heavy Metal Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage

by
Maropeng Vellry Raletsena
1,*,
Nkoana Ishmael Mongalo
1 and
Rabelani Munyai
2
1
College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (CAES), University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa
2
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (CAES), Horticulture Centre, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(2), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020192
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Responses of Vegetable Crops)

Abstract

:
In water-scant regions, the reuse of (un)treated acid mine drainage effluent (AMD) water for crop irrigation has turned into a prerequisite. The study assesses the levels of heavy metals, and health risk assessment in two potato crop cultivars, namely, Fianna and Lady rosetta (both determinate and indeterminate) when exposed to irrigation with different fly ash: acid mine drainage amelioration ratios. The study investigates the health risk assessment in the potato tissues namely, stem, tubers, new and old leaves of the potato cultivars. The treatments constituted a control, 50% FA: AMD, 75% FA: AMD ratio, and 100% AMD (untreated AMD). The results showed that the heavy metals of plants irrigated with AMD mixed with FA was significantly affected differently at harvest. In summary, the concentration of Cd was over the WHO acceptable standards in untreated acid mine drainage water. Fianna recorded 1.34 mg/kg while a notably decrease was observed in Lady rosetta with (1.01 mg/kg). In any case, FA was proven to significantly lessen the Cd particles in both FA-AMD ratios: Cd content was 0.98 mg/kg and 0.84 mg/kg in 50% FA: AMD treatment for Fianna and Lady rosetta separately, while the recommended maximum limit is 0.1 mg/kg. With the readings recorded, they are slightly high according to the CODEX general standard for food contaminants and toxins in food and feed (CODEX STAN 193-1995). Then again, in 75% FA: AMD ratio, the Cd concentration was 0.04 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta exclusively. It is in this way obvious that FA adsorbed the Cd ions, and the two cultivars fulfill the CODEX guideline, nonetheless the potato crop irrigated with a 75% FA: AMD ratio can be consumed by humans without causing any detrimental effects.

1. Introduction

Freshwater supply is one of the world’s greatest issues, with roughly 33% of the world’s drinking water coming from surface sources like streams, dams, lakes, and trenches. South Africa, in the same way as other different nations, contamination of existing water assets is the most risk to a reasonable water supply [1]. The country is recorded as one of the driest countries on the planet, and with a serious water shortage projected very soon [2]. High populaces development rate, industrialization, and urbanization has brought about a worldwide deficiency of great water supplies [3,4,5,6]. Rural and urban populaces depend on surface water, and with the country’s economy vigorously dependent on mining, the water supplies are logically being contaminated, strikingly by corrosive acid mine drainage effluent (AMD) [5].
Corrosive mine seepage is an overall result of mining tasks [6]. Mine profluent, which is both synthetically harmful and radioactive (on account of the West Rand), is delivered in different ways by mines, including run-off from mine dumps into surface and groundwater, leakage from mine dumps into underground water, and flood from deserted mines [7]. The way that AMD is incredibly hard to ameliorate and can persevere for a really long time, even after mine conclusion, as demonstrated by [8], makes it remarkable and particularly problematic. Changes in the quality and amount of irrigation water system water have different hindering outcomes on irrigated agricultural output, including diminished yields, deteriorated quality, and soil quality corruption [9]. Scientists [6,7,8,9,10] have recommended utilizing lime, phosphorous stone, fake wetlands, and the converse assimilation methodology to further develop corrosive mine seepage so it tends to be utilized as irrigation water for crop production.
The cost of decontaminating AMD water varies, with some treatments, such as fly ash (FA), being less expensive and capable of increasing irrigation water supply compared to liming, which is costly [10]. Because it is less expensive, using FA to cure AMD could help reduce water constraints in the South African agriculture business. In fact, an earlier study has revealed that FA could be a viable alternative to liming in the treatment of AMD [11]. While the rest of the world has made significant progress in adopting environmentally friendly technology to reduce mining pollution and alleviate poverty, Africa, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa, has lagged [6,7,8,9,10]. Even though the country’s economy is fueled by strong mining industry, South Africa is beset by a water security dilemma [11]. These two phenomena have harmed populations and ecosystems as a result of highly acidic water pouring into the country’s water supply [9,10,11]. The contaminated water released by abandoned mines is a source of concern for surrounding residents, especially those who live along the Vaal and Limpopo rivers [12]. This alarming situation, combined with the threat of climate change to food security, mandates the deployment of less costly, widely available, and environmentally friendly alternatives to alleviate the country’s dilemma. This study aims to determine if AMD is suitable for irrigation of potatoes, as well as the effects that this type of water has on the crop’s biochemical composition and physiological features, as well as its rhizosphere.
Although there are various acid mine water treatment techniques and procedures available, they all have drawbacks, such as high costs and difficulties with large precipitation resulting in insolubility [9,10]. Phosphate rock, for example, has been used to treat AMD in several studies. Phosphate is usually much more expensive than other calcium-based supplements, yet it is required in similar proportions [11]. However, due to its low solubility and inclination to form an exterior coating or armor of ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) when added to AMD, the successful application of limestone is limited [12,13]. Wetlands, on the other hand, are frequently suggested as a way to reduce heavy metals in contaminated water. A wetland system has three basic processes: (1) soil and substrate, (2) hydrology, and (3) plants. Because the entire process is interdependent, the heavy metal removal mechanisms in wetlands are quite intricate, and heavy metals have a deleterious impact on plants [14].
According to Yunusa et al. [15], fly ash can be used as an adsorbent to remove common dyes from acid mine drainage. Many potential positive applications of fly ash have been investigated in order to reduce waste, lower disposal costs, and generate value-added products [16]. It was shown to be useful as an ameliorant because it could restore the physical, chemical, and biological aspects of problematic soils while still containing easily available macro-and micronutrients for plant uptake. The use of fly ash in damaged soil increases plant biomass output, according to studies [15,16]. FA is a good soil ameliorant, according to the researchers, and its qualities boost soil fertility and productivity. Rios et al. [17,18] are among the researchers that have conducted extensive investigations that show fly ash may be used successfully to purify water and remove heavy metals from polluted water. They also confirmed that it is an important source of plant nutrients (e.g., Ca, Mg, K, P, S, B, Fe, Cu, and Zn).
Fly ash materials have also been considered as a viable resource for agricultural and industrial purposes. In agriculture, for example, it is valued as a useful and non-toxic fertilizer or soil amendment that can be used to clean up the soil [15]. This idea has been supported by a number of other scholars [16]. The characteristics are important since there are concerns about future lime supplies, particularly that deposits may be depleted by 2050 [16]. When more salt is added to water, the pH changes from neutral to alkaline [17,18]. This principle is applicable in the current study, both in terms of AMD treatment and the usage of fly ash. Heavy metals can form solutions in water, according to Nemutanzhela et al. [19], even if some of them are dangerous while in solution. Water dilution, according to [20], is founded on the idea that when water is added to specific elements, like as sodium (Na), NaOH is created based on the concentration of Na ions.
The research provided above refers to a variety of ways that have been employed in the past to mitigate the negative effects of AMD water; however, none of the solutions entail treating AMD in order to evaluate its usage in crop production. This study offers combining AMD water with varying quantities of FA. This approach has received little, if any, research and is not currently described in the literature. The harmful effects of AMD are expected to be decreased by using the water dilution strategy, and the product of this approach can be utilized to irrigate crops that are suitable for human consumption and have minimum environmental impact. Acid mine drainage contains substantial amounts of heavy metals, according to a recent study [21], and fly ash was employed to reduce the concentrations. Fly ash create a method that works for increasing ammonium and phosphate removal effectiveness at low concentrations without reducing removal capacity [22]. Other studies [23,24] previously discovered higher quantities of cadmium, cobalt, copper, lithium, mercury, strontium, and zinc in rice leaves, which they felt led to the production of necrotic areas and a significant degradation of Rubisco, particularly Rubisco LSU. Researchers have long investigated nutritional and metabolomic profile (molecular) components in diverse plants [25]. There are currently no published studies on the effects of heavy metals on metabolites in potatoes (treated or untreated with fly ash).
Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) are grown for food and are the world’s fourth most significant food crop, after rice, maize, and wheat [26]. The cultivation of this crop generates a lot of economic activity all over the world, but it takes a lot of water for irrigation [27]. Despite the fact that South Africa is a water-scarce country, there are considerable areas of land dedicated to potato farming. Furthermore, in some places where additional irrigation is used for potato production, surface water is polluted by mining by-products such as acid mine drainage and/or coal-burning fly ash. Acid mine drainage, in particular, is a serious environmental issue because it contains relatively high concentrations of heavy metals (Hg, Fe, Mn, Pb, Sr, Zn, and SO4), which can persist and bio-accumulate in plant cells, causing health risks to humans and animals [28]. Fly ash, on the other hand, has been shown to reduce heavy metal concentrations in soils such as Cd, Hg, Mn, Ni, Al, Fe, and Ti [27,28,29]. It has been proven, for example, to reduce heavy metal toxicity in contaminated waters [29].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Samples

The AMD used in the experiments was obtained from one of South Africa’s gold-producing mines in Randfontein, Gauteng Province, on the other hand, the FA came from one of ESKOM’s electricity-generating plants in the Mpumalanga Province. The AMD was mixed with FA (FA-treated AMD) at different ratios of 50% FA: AMD ratio, 3:1 (v/w) while the untreated AMD and the control (tap water) were expressed by ratios 100% FA: AMD ratio and a control respectively. Solution 50% FA: AMD was made up of 50% AMD and 50% FA, 75% FA: AMD contained 75% AMD and 25% FA. Untreated AMD, that is treatment 4, contained 100% AMD and a control contained 0% FA and tap water. Each FA: AMD irrigation (FA-treated AMD) solution was mixed in a 220L barrel. A stirrer was used to agitate the mixture for 30 min, and AMD contact time with FA was timed using a stopwatch. A bench pH meter (Model: ADWA—AD 1020, Hungary) was calibrated, and samples were measured for pH change during 6 spaced periods using [30] procedures and methodologies. The pH was assessed as impacted by FA at different time intervals and temperatures using one sample from each container and one tap water sample taken according to well-established sampling protocols.

2.2. Collection and Processing of Soil and Plant Material

The study was conducted over two growing seasons (April to July 2018 (1st season) and October to December 2018 (2nd season). A growth media was prepared using the topsoil, river sand, and vermiculite at a ratio of 3:1:1 and the media was sterilized. One bag of 20 kg of 3:2:1 (24) + Zn mixed fertilizer was mixed with the growth medium. Certified seeds of two cultivars namely Lady rosetta (determinate) and Fianna (indeterminate) were obtained from First Potato Dynamics (Pty) Ltd. in the Western Cape Province, and they were stored at the National Potato Co-op (Nationale Aartappelkantoor (NAK)). The storage facilities were in Bethal in the Mpumalanga Province.
All the seed tubers were first stored at 3 °C and later transferred to 15 °C at 14-day intervals. The pot (20 × 20 cm) experiments were carried out in a greenhouse setup with each comprising of the four irrigation treatments replicated six times for each cultivar (see Figure 1). A 2 × 5 factorial experiment was laid out in a completely randomized block design in a glasshouse at the Florida campus, University of South Africa (Unisa), Johannesburg, Gauteng Province (26°10′30″ S, 27°55′22.8″ E). The experiments were carried out in two growing seasons, i.e., in autumn (Season 1) and in spring (Season 2). The treatments constituted of control, 50% FA: AMD, 75% FA: AMD ratio, and 100% AMD (untreated AMD). Plants were well irrigated before the imposition of the treatments. Irrigation treatments were executed two weeks after seedling establishment. Harvesting was done upon maturity of the plants at 90 days after planting [31].

2.3. Determination of Concentration of Mineral Nutrients in Tubers

Plant samples were digested using the reference method by the EPA 3050B. About 1 g of dried potato tuber samples was weighed and milled into a medium wall digestion tube (4IS 0 mm id × 276 mmm length). About 15 mL of concentrated Nitric Acid (65%) (Merck, South Africa) was added and after 2 h, contents were placed on a cold heating (digestion) block and heated to 100 °C until fumes reduced. Thereafter, contents were re-heated in increments of 10 °C up to a maximum of 140 °C for an hour to ensure complete digestion of plant material and as shown by development of a yellow color 41. After adding about 5 drops of AR-quality hydrogen peroxide (Chem lab supplies, JHB, South Africa), the mixture was heated for 5 to 10 min, cooled, and then washed with de-ionized water into a 100 °C volumetric flask. Preparation and analysis of plant samples followed [32]. The concentrations of heavy metals in plant material were recorded on a fresh-and dry weight basis (Table 1). The supernatant was filtered into a storage vessel as described by [33]. The heavy metals were analyzed from potato tubers using an Inductively coupled Plasma Mass Spectrophotometer (ICAP 6300, Thermo Electron, London, UK) from the University of South Africa, Florida, South Africa. These ions are then separated and detected by the mass spectrometer following the method EPA 3050B procedures.

2.4. Heavy Metal Contamination and Health Risk Assessment

2.4.1. Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) and Translocation Factor (TF) of Toxic Metals

The bioaccumulation factor (Table 2) is the proportion of heavy metal concentration in edible part of a plant to heavy metal concentration in a soil sample [34,35]. Correspondingly, the transfer of heavy metals from soil to plant was calculated as shown by [36]: Equation (1).
B A F = T c S c
where Tc is metal concentration in plant tissue (mg/g dry weight (d.w.)) and Sc is the metal concentration in sediment (mg/g d.w.) [37].
Abdu et al. (2011) and Safarzadeh et al. (2013) [38,39] reported that metals translocate from soil and to plant parts, root and shoot (Table 3). The following Equation (2) was used to calculate the translocation factor thereof:
T F = B A F   o f   s t e m   o r   l e a f B A F   o f   r o o t

2.4.2. Estimation of Potential Health Risks from Potato Consumption

In order to estimate the potential health risks associated with the consumption of potato exposed to toxic metals, the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of toxic metals and estimated daily intake (EDI) were determined first.

2.4.3. Estimated Daily Intake (EDI)

The daily intake (Table 3) of the metals considered in this study were determined based on their mean concentration in each potato sample and the estimated daily consumption of the vegetables was reported in grams. The EDI value of each metal of interest was determined by the formula utilized by [40] with slight modifications as shown in Equation (3).
E D I = E f × E D × F I R × C M × C F B W × T A × 0.001  
where Ef is exposure frequency (365 day/year); ED is the exposure duration (65 years), equivalent to average life time [41]; FIR is the average food (vegetable) consumption (240 g/person/day), which were obtained from the World Health Report [42] for low fruit and vegetable intake; CM is metal concentration (mg/kg dry weight); Cf is concentration conversion factor for fresh vegetable weight to dry weight (which is 0.085) [42]; BW is reference body weight for an adult, which is 70 kg [43]; TA is the average exposure time (65 years × 365 days) and 0.001 is unit conversion factor.

2.4.4. Risk from the Intake of Heavy Metals through Ingestion (Target Hazard Quotient, THQ)

In order to assess the non-carcinogenic human health risk from the consumption of vegetables contaminated by heavy metals, the target hazard quotient (THQ) values were estimated. The THQ values (Table 4) of the local population due to the consumption of contaminated vegetables were calculated using Equation (4) as described by [44,45,46].
T H Q = E D I R f D  
where EDI is the estimated daily metal intake of the population in mg/day/kg body weight and RfD is the oral reference dose (mg/kg/day) values for each metal of interest and as listed in Table 4. Where the value of THQ is <1, it is generally presumed to be safe for the risk of noncarcinogenic effects and if it is >1, it is supposed that there is a chance of noncarcinogenic effects with an increasing probability as the value upsurges [47,48,49].

2.4.5. Target Cancer Risk (TR)

It has been documented that individual health risks of the analyzed heavy metals in the same vegetable are accumulative and that is expressed as hazard index (HI). The mathematical expression of HI suggested by USEPA and referred in literature [50,51,52] was calculated using Equation (5).
HI = THQ(Cd) + THQ(Pb) + THQ(Zn) + THQ(Ni) + THQ(Cu)
where HI = hazard index, THQ(Cd) = target hazard quotient for Pb intake, and a similar notation was also used for other trace metals (Table 4).
The potential carcinogenic effect (Table 5) of metals (Cd, Pb and Ni) was further characterized by calculating the maximum allowable daily potato consumption limit (TRlim). TRlim and was determined by Equation (6):
T R l i m = ( A R L × B W ) ( C × C P S o )  
where, ARL is maximum acceptable risk level (10-5, unitless); BW is average adult body in kg (60.7 kg for South African population); C is mean metal concentration in the different potato treatments; and CPSo is the cancer slope factor (6.3, 0.009 and 1.7 mg/kg/day for Cd, Pb and Ni, respectively) [53].

2.5. Data Analysis

All parameters (heavy metal analysis) and measurements (health risk assessment) were compared. All parameters and measurements were tested at p < 0.05 significance level and the Duncan multiple range test was used for separation between treatment means. Statistica v. 10, StatSoft was used for all statistical analysis.

3. Results

Some of the chosen elements, such V, Be, and Ba, were undetectable in all plant organs after receiving all fly ash acid mine drainage treatments. On the other hand, eleven other elements (Al, Pb, Co, Ni, Cd, Fe, Ca, Mg, Zn, Cu, and Mo) were detected in all parts of the potatoes that were irrigated with FA-treated AMD treatments (Table 1). The AMD treatments on potato tubers had a significant (p ≤ 0.01) effect of reducing the concentration of Pb, Co, Ni, Cd, Fe, B, Zn, and Cu when compared to the control. According to Table 1, the treated acid mine drainage showed significant differences in the concentration of minerals such as SO42−, Na, Ca, K, Mg, and Mo as they were higher.
There was a significant increase of lead (Table 1) in the ameliorated and untreated acid mine drainage. Also, 100% FA-AMD ratio demonstrated a significantly higher Pb concentration (0.02 mg/kg) in both cultivars compared to treatments that were ameliorated with FA and control (Table 1). Whereas control displayed significantly lower Pb concentration (0.01 mg/kg for Fianna) and (0.02 mg/kg Lady rosetta) cultivars compared to 75% FA/AMD with 0.00 mg/kg Pb for both cultivars respectively.
When irrigated with a control, the test potato tubers exhibited 1.88 mg/kg and 1.33 mg/kg Fe respectively for Fianna and Lady rosetta (Table 1). By contrast, 50% FA: AMD ratio showed 0.77 mg/kg and 0.65 mg/kg for both cultivars, respectively. It can be said therefore that potatoes irrigated with 100% AMD (untreated AMD) accumulated the highest Fe concentration (69.13 mg/kg and 67.18 mg/kg) compared to treatments that were ameliorated with FA and control (Table 1). This is an indication that the fly ash could have absorbed Fe ions thus reducing their availability in the potato crop.
The minerals (Table 1) translocated in the organ (tuber) of the potato crop. Nickel did not significantly affect both cultivars when irrigated with the control (tap water). The reading for Fianna and Lady rosetta recorded 0.09 mg/kg when irrigated with control. For 50% FA: AMD ratio, Fianna recorded 1.77 and 1.68 mg/kg for Lady rosetta respectively. While 75% FA: AMD ratio did not show a significant difference for both cultivars. Moreover, 100% AMD did not show any significant difference in the cultivar. Lastly, the treatment highly had an impact when cultivars were irrigated with FA: AMD ratios at p ≤ 0.001.
Aluminum had no significant difference in the cultivars for control, for control Fianna and Lady rosetta both recorded 0.00 mg/kg. The same results were observed for 50% FA: AMD ratio. Whilst Fianna and Lady rosetta recorded 1.23 mg/kg when irrigated with 75% FA: AMD ratio. Lastly, when cultivars were irrigated with 100% AMD ratio Fianna recorded 5.39 ang 5.74 mg/kg for Lady rosetta respectively. Moreover, the treatment significantly had an impact when potato crops were irrigated with FA: AMD ratios at p ≤ 0.05 and Lady rosetta recorded 69.13 and 67.18 mg/kg at p ≤ 0.001.
Table 1. Heavy metal distribution from acid mine water drainage (AMD) water mixed with fly ash (FA) on the plant tissue (tuber) of two cultivars of potato. Values (Mean ± S.E.) followed by similar letters in a column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. NS = not significant.
Table 1. Heavy metal distribution from acid mine water drainage (AMD) water mixed with fly ash (FA) on the plant tissue (tuber) of two cultivars of potato. Values (Mean ± S.E.) followed by similar letters in a column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. NS = not significant.
OrganNiCuFeZnAlPbCoCd
Tuber
Control—F0.09 ± 0.00 b0.00 ± 0.0 a1.88 ± 0.0 b0.19 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.9 ab0.01 ± 0.0 b0.07 ± 0.0 b0.01 ± 0.0 a
Control—LR0.09 ± 0.00 b0.00 ± 0.0 a1.33 ± 0.0 b0.18 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.9 ab0.02 ± 0.0 b0.06 ± 0.0 b0.07 ± 0.0 a
50% FA: AMD—F1.77 ± 0.01 c0.12 ± 0.0 a0.77 ± 0.0 a0.15 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.0 a0.16 ± 0.1 a0.98 ± 0.0 b
50% FA: AMD—LR1.68 ± 0.00 c0.00 ± 0.0 a0.65 ± 0.0 a0.13 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.0 a0.00 ± 0.0 a0.17 ± 0.1 a0.84 ± 0.0 b
75% FA: AMD—F0.01 ± 0.00 a0.03 ± 0.0 b0.98 ± 0.1 a0.29 ± 0.0 b1.23 ± 0.00 b0.00 ± 0.0 a0.02 ± 0.0 c0.04 ± 0.0 a
75% FA: AMD—LR0.01 ± 0.00 a0.02 ± 0.0 b0.50 ± 0.0 a0.22 ± 0.0 b1.23 ± 0.01 b0.00 ± 0.0 a0.01 ± 0.0 c0.03 ± 0.0 a
100% AMD—F1.89 ± 0.00 d1.22 ± 0.0 c69.13 ± 0.4 c13.23 ± 0.0 c5.39 ± 0.3 c0.02 ± 0.0 b0.02 ± 0.0 c1.34 ± 0.0 c
100% AMD—LR1.88 ± 0.01 d1.23 ± 0.0 c67.18 ± 0.2 c12.86 ± 0.0 c5.74 ± 0.02 c0.02 ± 0.0 b0.02 ± 0.0 c1.01 ± 0.0 c
F-Statistics
Organ14.58 ***9.00 **6.65 *** 3.22 *20.65 **5.70 **4.35 **
* F—Fianna (cultivar 1); * LR—Lady rosetta (cultivar 2); * Control (tap water); * 50% FA: AMD; * 75% FA: AMD; * 100% AMD; a–d Means within a single variable and column followed by a different letter are significantly different according to the Fisher’s least significant difference test (0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 level).
The results of the current study revealed a significant difference in the concentration of Cu in tissues of potatoes grown with the application of ameliorated and untreated acid mine drainage (Table 1). Especially, irrigation with 100% AMD (untreated AMD) recorded a Cu concentration of 1.22 mg/kg and 1.23 mg/kg for the respective cultivars compared to treatments that were ameliorated with FA and control (Table 1). On the other hand, potatoes supplied with a control displayed significantly lower Cu: 0.00 mg/kg for the Fianna and 0.00 mg/kg for Lady rosetta cultivars compared to watering with 75% FA: AMD ratio which resulted in 0.03 mg/kg Cu in Fianna and 0.02 mg/kg in Lady rosetta. All FA-treated AMD irrigated potatoes had significantly higher Cu levels compared to the control (Table 1). These figures met the CODEX general standard limits for food contaminants and toxins in food and feed (CODEX STAN 193-1995) which recommends a maximum 0.3 mg/kg for potato. The WHO and FAO recommends that the concentration of Cu in food should not be above 30 mg/kg while that of the NAFDAC is 20 mg/kg for food. Table 1 shows that the fly ash was able to ameliorate the copper ions in the 100% AMD ant thus rendering the potatoes safe to consume.
On the other hand, untreated acid mine drainage recorded the highest Ni as Fianna had 1.89 mg/kg, while Lady rosetta had a 1.88 mg/kg. It should be noted that there are no specified standard limits for Ni for metals in foods and vegetables FAO/WHO, NAFDAC nor in CODEX standards.
The concentration of Cd in stems (Figure 2) of potatoes irrigated with acid mine drainage was relatively higher (Table 1). For example, irrigation with a control recorded 0.08 mg/kg Cd in Fianna and 0.07 mg/kg Cd in Lady rosetta. When untreated AMD was used to water the test potatoes, it elicited significantly high Cd concentration: 2.01 mg/kg for Fianna and 4.61 mg/kg for Lady rosetta compared to treatments that were ameliorated with FA and control. On the other hand, the application of 50% FA-AMD displayed significantly lower Cd concentration of 1.01 mg/kg and 0.88 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars, respectively.
The ratio of the studied elements’ concentration in leaves to tubers was consistently higher in Fianna than in Lady rosetta. This support the hypothesis that differences in final tuber concentration between cultivars are related to element loading into the phloem or element movement once loaded into the phloem. The mechanisms driving the re-distribution of mineral elements from leaves to tubers, nonetheless, may not always be related to those governing Cd transport. Mineral element concentrations in the leaves of cultivar Fianna were comparable to or higher than those of cultivar Lady rosetta. The only element with higher quantities in Fianna’s leaves was cadmium.
Recurrent irrigation of the potato cultivars with FA-AMD radically affected new and old leaves (Figure 3). The concentration of Fe in old leaves was 2.22 mg/kg and 2.02 mg/kg respectively for Fianna and Lady rosetta when irrigated with a control. In contrast, the Fe concentration in new leaves was 0.66 mg/kg and 0.58 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta, respectively. As to be expected, Fe was high in the untreated acid mine drainage in new leaves (1.29 and 1.23 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta, respectively) and old leaves (3.54 mg/kg for Fianna and 3.62 mg/kg for Lady rosetta).
With regards to Cd, irrigating with a control showed a concentration of 0.00 mg/kg for both cultivars in older leaves. Interestingly, new leaves had no Cd content. When the crops were irrigated with untreated acid mine drainage, they showed 0.32 mg/kg and 0.35 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta. Nonetheless, untreated acid mine drainage proved to account for significantly increased Ni concentration in both the older and new leaves of both cultivars 0.05 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg for both cultivars.
The soil-plant transfer coefficient (Figure 4) of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars irrigated with untreated and FA: AMD ratios. There is a significance difference between cultivars when the crops are irrigated with the 0% acid mine drainage (control) Cd recorded 2.5 and 14.96 for Fianna and Lady rosetta, respectively. For the rest of the treatments 50% FA: AMD, 75% FA: AMD ratio, and 100% AMD (untreated AMD), Fianna showed higher soil-plant transfer coefficient percentages. The same pattern is observed for Pb, Lady rosetta showed higher percentages in the control with values of 191.80 and 246.66 for Fianna and Lady rosetta, respectively. Moreover, Fianna recorded higher percentages in three other treatments as observed with Cd. For Cu, 100% AMD ratio (untreated AMD) recorded higher soil-plant transfer coefficient compared to other treatments. Cultivars did not show a significance difference when irrigated with untreated acid mine water, Fianna recorded 6.15 whilst Lady rosetta recorded 6.18.
Results (Table 2) showed a high significant of bioaccumulation of metals in the potato samples. For example, when the Fianna was irrigated with 75% AMD, it recorded 11.83 mg/kg Cd while its counterpart exhibited 12.50 mg/kg Cd. Furthermore, when both cultivars were irrigated with untreated acid mine drainage, they had 2.37 Cd. The concentration of Zn, Ni and Cu were similar between the test potato cultivars and treatment thereof. This can be explained by the high concentration of Cd found in the soil and water samples we have analyzed in this study.
Table 2. Effect of AMD treatments on the bioaccumulation factor (BF) of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Table 2. Effect of AMD treatments on the bioaccumulation factor (BF) of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Bioaccumulation Factor (BF)
TreatmentsCultivarsCdPbZnNiCu
ControlFianna0.230.360.450.160.23
ControlLady rosetta0.200.380.450.170.23
50% FA: AMDFianna0.781.170.030.000.15
50% FA: AMDLady rosetta0.861.100.030.000.14
75% FA: AMDFianna11.835.430.190.000.01
75% FA: AMDLady rosetta12.505.620.210.000.01
100% AMDFianna2.370.020.000.000.04
100% AMDLady rosetta2.370.020.000.000.04
The average daily intake (EDI) of Pb, Cd, Zn, Ni and Cu were estimated according to the mean concentration of each metal in each potato cultivar in all treatments. The EDI of studies metals from consumption of potato samples are shown in Table 3. The recorded average figures of EDI for Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni and Cu in the Fianna cultivar for control were 3.43, 5.13, 5.15, 2.45 and 1.07 (mg/person/day). With regards to the other cultivar (Lady rosetta), the following readings were recorded: 1.96, 6.60, 4.86, and 4.46 (mg/person/day) respectively. It is evident that the EDI differed significantly in all treatments.
Table 3. Effect of AMD treatments on the Translocation factor (TF) and Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Table 3. Effect of AMD treatments on the Translocation factor (TF) and Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Translocation Factor (TF)Estimated Daily Intake (EDI)
TreatmentsCultivarsCdPbZnNiCdPbZnNi
ControlFianna0.300.371.720.033.485.135.152.45
ControlLady rosetta1.460.311.830.031.966.604.862.48
50% FA: AMDFianna17.740.871.670.002.621.314.024.74
50% FA: AMDLady rosetta16.700.881.820.002.251.343.704.52
75% FA: AMDFianna23.660.780.880.331.071.847.995.11
75% FA: AMDLady rosetta18.751.011.290.368.031.485.904.95
100% AMDFianna19.940.300.020.033.595.693.545.06
100% AMDLady rosetta15.090.320.000.032.725.393.435.03
Threshold hazard quotient (THQ) values for the individual heavy metals through the consumption of potatoes are shown in Table 4. The THQ values in Pb, Zn, Ni and Cu were evaluated based on available slope factors. The cancer risk (Table 4) for all three metals (Pb, Zn and Ni). The 50% FA: AMD ratio recorded 0.480 and 0.413 for Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars, respectively. Nonetheless, treatment untreated AMD recorded the highest with values (0.668 and 5.15) for both Fianna and Lady rosetta respectively. The recorded average figures of potential carcinogenic effects for Cd, Pb and Ni in the Fianna cultivar for all treatment were 0.00 mg/kg (Table 5). Nickel reported 0.00 mg/kg in all treatments except in 75% FA: AMD ratio which recorded 0.02 mg/kg in both cultivars.
It can be concluded from the analysis that irrigating the selected potato cultivars with untreated acid mine drainage caused the accumulation of more heavy metals when compared with the other three treatments. Overall, the threshold hazard quotient (THQ) values were ˃1 for all heavy metals and it can be concluded that if the potatoes subjected to these treatments were consumed, they could not pose health risks.
Table 4. Effect of AMD treatments on the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Target cancer risk (TR) and Cancer risk of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Table 4. Effect of AMD treatments on the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Target cancer risk (TR) and Cancer risk of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Target Hazard Quotient (THQ)Target Cancer Risk (TR)Cancer Risk
TreatmentsCultivarsCdPbZnNiCdPbZnNi
ControlFianna0.000.000.000.000.010.000.000.000.01
ControlLady rosetta0.030.000.000.000.030.000.000.000.04
50% FA: AMDFianna0.450.000.000.020.450.000.000.020.50
50% FA: AMDLady rosetta0.390.000.000.010.390.000.000.020.41
75% FA: AMDFianna0.010.000.000.000.020.000.000.000.20
75% FA: AMDLady rosetta0.010.000.000.000.010.000.000.000.01
100% AMDFianna0.620.000.010.020.630.000.010.020.70
100% AMDLady rosetta0.470.000.010.020.500.000.010.020.51
Table 5. Effect of AMD treatments on the Potential carcinogenic effects of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Table 5. Effect of AMD treatments on the Potential carcinogenic effects of two potato varieties (Fianna and Lady rosetta).
Potential Carcinogenic Effects
TreatmentsCultivarsCdPbNi
ControlFianna0.003.710.00
ControlLady rosetta0.002.890.00
50% FA: AMDFianna0.0014.510.00
50% FA: AMDLady rosetta0.0014.260.00
75% FA: AMDFianna0.0010.360.02
75% FA: AMDLady rosetta0.0012.880.02
100% AMDFianna0.003.350.00
100% AMDLady rosetta0.003.540.00

4. Discussion

Nickel (Ni) is needed by plants for the absorption of iron and seed germination however its deficiency causes plants to produce nonviable seeds [51,52,53]. Its application through fertilizer protects crops from certain yield-limiting diseases, potentially lowering pesticide use and increasing crop production [54,55,56]. Irrigating the Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars with a control resulted in similar concentration of Ni in their tissues (0.09 mg/kg). The fly ash that was mixed with AMD seemed to have ameliorated the acid mine drainage hence the tubers recorded the lowest amount of Ni. This was shown when the potatoes were irrigated with the 75% FA: AMD ratio, which resulted in accumulation of 0.01 mg/kg Ni in the Fianna and 0.19 mg/kg Ni in Lady rosetta. Results in Figure 2 are supported that by [57,58,59] where fly ash was said to have adsorbed Ni ions in acid mine drainage water.
Other studies [60,61] also observed a higher Cd content in older leaves of potato. The results of this study as shown in Figure 3A,B illustrates that the Ni content in both older and new leaves was not traceable particularly when plants were irrigated with a control. Similarly, the irrigation with 50% FA: AMD showed no traces of Ni as none was recorded for both older and new leaves of both cultivars. The above results are support that by [62] where they found no Ni in both old and new leaves on both cultivars. This observed growth inhibition in both cultivars could be attributed possibly to phyto-accumulation of heavy metals in plant organs. Heavy metal stress is reported to have a suppressive effect on the overall growth of plants, which for example can be manifested in reduced shoot growth in potato [63,64,65] and spinach [66], and a decline in the number of pods and seed yield in pigeon pea [67,68,69].
On the other hand, watering with 50% FA: AMD recorded 1.77 mg/kg and 1.68 mg/kg Ni for Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars, respectively. Some of the selected elements such as V, Be and Ba were below detection in all plant organs in all fly ash acid mine drainage treatments. This is because these elements are adsorbed and are not readily available [70].
Knowledge on the elemental concentrations in irrigation water is important and in cases where they are relatively low compared to that recommended for irrigation water in South Africa [71] however, in the long-term, irrigating plants with these treatments can lead to a build-up of metals in soils, their absorption, translocation, and accumulation in plant organs. Also, it is crucial to know the concentration of heavy metals in soils in croplands especially soils used in experimental settings. For this study, selected chemical properties of the soil were analyzed, particularly to assess if it contained toxic metals. Results of this study show a significant effect of irrigating the test potatoes with AMD mixed with FA on the translocation of heavy metals in the tissues of potatoes. Nonetheless, the selected cultivars revealed no significant difference in both seasons for both cultivars when irrigated with all four FA: AMD ratios.
The differences were probably due to genetic differences in their inherent tuber sizes that is, the Fianna cultivar generally has a bigger tuber size compared to Lady rosetta. In their study, reported that tubers from different cultivars tend to exhibit varying sizes and weights, propably as a result of genetic make-up [72]. The results of this study support that by [73] who reported that different irrigation regimes affect cultivars differently due to diverse genotypes. The explanation for the difference noted in the 75% FA: AMD ratio could be that it contained fewer toxins and therefore the fly ash could have been able to adsorb the heavy metals in the acid mine drainage. Such results agree with that earlier shown by [74,75]. A study by Bilate and Mulualem (2016) [76] showed that heavy metal concentration in irrigation water significantly reduces the tuber fresh and dry weight of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars. Their results were in agreement with previous findings by [77], where they agreed that the acid mine effluents had considerably affected the tuber growth and the size thereof.
Potato plants are known to flower and start tuberization 8 weeks after planting, a period during which major and trace elements are needed. In this study, the required macro-micronutrients could have been supplied by the AMD and Fly Ash. Invariably, the fact that the cultivars responded differently in terms of growth and tuber yield to long-term exposure to the treatments could suggest genetic differences in their ability to absorb, translocate and accumulate heavy metals. These findings in this regard are in agreement with studies by [78,79]; who reported genetic differences in the accumulation of Cd and other metals in organs of two potato cultivars cultivated in heavy metal-contaminated soils in Australia.
Literature background has reported on distribution of Cd between tissues of matured potato plants given that the concentration of Cd in matured plants has implications to human health. Cadmium is critical because it has major health consequences; renal impairment caused by chronic dietary Cd exposure is characterized by proximal tubule dysfunction [80]. For this study, regular irrigation of potato with a control ratio drastically increased the Cd content in tubers (0.01 mg/kg and 0.07 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta respectively. The concentration of Cd was above the WHO acceptable limits in untreated acid mine drainage. Table 1 showed that Fianna recorded 1.34 mg/kg Cd whilst that in Lady rosetta was slightly lower (1.01 mg/kg). Nonetheless, FA was able to significantly reduce the Cd ions in both FA-AMD treatments (Figure 2): Cd content was 0.98 mg/kg and 0.84 mg/kg in 50% FA: AMD ratio for Fianna and Lady rosetta respectively, while the recommended maximum limit is 0.1 mg/kg [81]. The readings were slightly high according to the CODEX general standard for food contaminants and toxins in food and feed (CODEX STAN 193-1995). On the other hand, in 75% FA: AMD ratio the Cd concentration was 0.04 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta individually. It is thus evident that FA adsorbed the Cd ions and both cultivars meet the CODEX standard, therefore the potato crop irrigated with a 75% FA: AMD ratio ratio can be consumed by humans without causing any detrimental effects.
According to [82,83,84] Cd intake via the food chain poses a major hazard to human health because it is potentially implicated in cancer, kidney tubule damage, and bone fractures. The finding of this study therefore is significant in that Cd can be reduced to acceptable levels by 75% FA: AMD ratio. Mixing FA with AMD at a ratio of 75% FA: AMD has also been shown by [85,86,87,88,89,90] to adsorb the heavy metals. Other studies [90,91,92] attested that despite that Cd is a non-essential element, its ions are distributed throughout organs of potato cultivars, and it is detrimental to plant growth and human health. The aim of this study was to see if differences in tuber heavy metal concentrations were due to inherently increased plant uptake by cultivar Fianna or changes in heavy metal dispersion throughout the plant. In the main, the concentration of mineral nutrients in Fianna tubers was higher than in Lady rosetta tubers. The concentration of Pb was significantly higher in all FA-amended AMD treatments including 100% AMD compared with the control (Table 1). The values of Pb shown in this study meet the maximum allowable limit for food and feed which is 0.1 mg/kg (CODEX STAN 193-1995). In conclusion, all the FA-AMD treated potatoes had Pb concentration that was below the minimum standard limits, and this proves that FA was able to adsorb the Pb ions in the tuber samples. Importantly, it reduces the metal’s concentration, a finding also reported by [90,91,92].
Supplying 75% FA: AMD significantly decreased the Fe concentration in the tubers as they recorded 0.98 mg/kg and 0.50 mg/kg for both cultivars, respectively. This means that the 75% FA: AMD ratio was able to reduce the element’s concentration drastically. The above results support that earlier shown by [93,94] and confirm the ability of fly ash to absorb the Fe ions especially from the 100% AMD (untreated AMD) ratio. The maximum limit of FAO/WHO guidelines for metals in foods and vegetables for Fe is 48 mg/kg. Given the results shown in Table 2, it is evident that irrigating the test cultivars with the 75% FA: AMD does not elicit increased Fe and the tubers can be consumed and not cause any significant detrimental effects on the health of humans. It should be noted however that the application of Fe at lower and higher rates than those suggested are deemed inefficient because they are thought to limit plant development, decrease chlorophyll content, and inhibit photosynthesis [95,96].
Overall, older leaves of both cultivars exhibited greater Fe compared to new leaves (Figure 3A,B). This could likely be because older leaves are likely to have accumulated Fe over time as described by [97].
The importance of micronutrients in health and nutrition cannot be overstated, and zinc is one of them [98,99]. In fact, the value of Zn is increasingly recognized especially in human health because its shortage especially in staple diets may play a significant role in the onset of diseases [100,101]. Analysis done in this research show that tubers irrigated with tap water and untreated acid mine drainage exhibited significant increased Zn concentration (Table 1). Potato tubers irrigated with tap water recorded Zn concentrations of 0.19 mg/kg and 0.18 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivars, respectively. On the other hand, when the Fianna cultivar was watered with the 50% FA: AMD ratio, it showed 0.15 mg/kg while its counterpart had 0.13 mg/kg Zn. These values were relatively lower compared to potatoes irrigated with untreated acid mine drainage. It is evident that the fly ash was able to ameliorate Zn ions in the acid mine drainage water, nonetheless, when irrigated with acid mine drainage, Fianna exhibited 13.23 mg/kg Zn while Lady rosetta showed 12.83 mg/kg. Overall, the concentration of Zn was increased in potatoes that were not treated with AMD. Lastly, the concentration of Zn in all the test treatments was below that recommended in the FAO/WHO guidelines for metals in foods and vegetables which are 60 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg in the NAFDAC and CODEX standards.
The EDI values shown in Table 2 proved that Cd is consumed above the permitted maximum tolerable daily intake however, Pb, Zn, Ni and Cu were below the permitted values which were obtained from the World Health Report [73]. This compared to plants irrigated with 75% FA: AMD ratio which revealed Cd concentration of 0.08 mg/kg for the Fianna and 0.07 mg/kg for Lady rosetta. In this case, the differences could probably be attributable to genotypic variations in the partitioning of Cd between the tubers and the rest of the plant, particularly the proportion of Cd that was retained in the roots and leaves. This argument was recently advanced by [102,103], that genotypic variations in terms of heavy metals exist in plants e.g., in sweet potatoes and tomatoes. It was proven in this study that there was no significant net influx of metals into the shoot tissue as none were found in the shoot. This could be due to a disruption in Cd import into the leaf tissue or a balance between Cd transport into the leaf tissue and re-translocation to other plant tissues as was also proposed by [104] on different seasonal crops mustard (Brassica campestris), cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), and spinach (Brassica oleracea var. capitata).
Considering xylem flow controls, it is probable that Cd is imported into leaf tissue, and it is unlikely that it will stop being carried to the leaves because xylem flow is required to replace water lost during transpiration [105]. The translocation and mobility of heavy metals have been researched in plants such as beans and wheat. For example, studied the absorption, transport, and mobility of radionuclides applied to leaves of beans [106]. These radioactive isotopes had varied mobility in the phloem, according to the researchers. Confirmed that phloem transport provided the metal micronutrients Mn, Zn, Co, and Fe and that this transport was linked to the availability of nicotianamine [107]. In addition to its role in long-distance transport, found that nicotianamine is critical for the regulation of metal transfer within cells [108]. According to [75], a threshold hazard quotient that is less than 1 mean that the vegetable can be consumed, and it cannot cause detrimental effect on the human health.
The most plausible method for Cd transport to tubers appears to be from the soil through basal roots to xylem shoots, followed by re-translocation to tubers in the phloem [109]. The difference in mineral nutrient contents in the tubers of the two varieties used in this study was unexpected. This may suggest that there are fundamental differences in the phloem loading mechanisms of the two cultivars as was also postulated by [110] where the concept of differential phloem loading systems was suggested within the same plant species. The ratio of an element’s concentration in the leaves to that in the tubers can be used to estimate its phloem mobility [35]. A higher ratio implies that a bigger percentage of that element is still in the leaves and is not being transported to the tuber via the phloem [111].

5. Conclusions

In summary, the concentration of Cd was over the WHO acceptable standards in untreated acid mine drainage water. Fianna recorded 1.34 mg/kg while a notably decrease was observed in Lady rosetta with (1.01 mg/kg). In any case, FA was proven to significantly lessen the Cd particles in both FA-AMD ratios: Cd content was 0.98 mg/kg and 0.84 mg/kg in 50% FA: AMD ratio for Fianna and Lady rosetta separately, while the recommended maximum limit is 0.1 mg/kg. With the readings recorded, they are slightly high according to the CODEX general standard for food contaminants and toxins in food and feed (CODEX STAN 193-1995). Then again, in 75% FA: AMD ratio, the Cd concentration was 0.04 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg for Fianna and Lady rosetta exclusively. It is in this way obvious that FA adsorbed the Cd ions, and the two cultivars fulfill the CODEX guideline, nonetheless the potato crop irrigated with a 75% FA: AMD ratio ratio can be consumed by humans without causing any detrimental effects. It was the main purpose of this project to describe the basic features of Cd, Zn, Pb, and Ni uptake and translocation, and to uncover the reasons behind genotypic differences in heavy metal accumulation in tubers. Lastly, according to literature a threshold hazard quotient that is less than 1 mean that the vegetable can be consumed, and it cannot cause detrimental effect on the human health. Lead proved to have the highest potential carcinogenic effect and value slightly higher which were obtained from United State Environmental Protection Agency.

Author Contributions

M.V.R. assisted with the experimental design as well as data collection. N.I.M. and R.M. assisted with data analysis and manuscript formulation of the manuscript entitled “Heavy Metal Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage”. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masindi, V.; Foteinis, S.; Renforth, P.; Ndiritu, J.; Maree, J.P.; Tekere, M.; Chatzisymeon, E. Challenges and avenues for acid mine drainage treatment, beneficiation, and valorisation in circular economy: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 183, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Masood, N.; Hudsone-Edwards, K.; Farooqi, A. True cost of coal: Coal mining industry and its associated environmental impacts on water resource development. J. Sustain. Min. 2020, 19, 35–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rezaie, B.; Anderson, A. Sustainable resolutions for environmental threat of the acid mine drainage. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Acharya, B.S.; Kharel, G. Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States–An overview. J. Hydrol. 2020, 588, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Huis, A. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: A review. J. Insects Food Feed. 2020, 6, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Genty, T.; Bussière, B.; Potvin, R.; Benzaazoua, M.; Zagury, G.J. Dissolution of calcitic marble and dolomitic rock in high iron concentrated acid mine drainage: Application to anoxic limestone drains. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 66, 2387–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Payus, C.; Ann Huey, L.; Adnan, F.; Besse Rimba, A.; Mohan, G.; Kumar Chapagain, S.; Roder, G.; Gasparatos, A.; Fukushi, K. Impact of extreme drought climate on water security in North Borneo: Case study of Sabah. Water 2020, 12, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matabane, D.L. Identification Determination of Potentially Toxic Elements in Water and Sediments from Blood and Mokolo rivers in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, G.; Ye, Y.; Yao, N.; Hu, N.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y. A critical review of prevention, treatment, reuse, and resource recovery from acid mine drainage. J. Clean. 2021, 329, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, M.; Nandi, M.; Pakshirajan, K. Recent advances in heavy metal recovery from wastewater by biogenic sulfide precipitation. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 278, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abrams, S.A.; Atkinson, S.A. Calcium, magnesium, phosphorus and vitamin D fortification of complementary foods. J. Nutri. 2003, 133, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ziemkiewicz, P.F.; McDonald, L.M. Acid mine drainage formation, control and treatment: Approaches and strategies. J. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2019, 6, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mbamba, C.K. Using Froth Flotation to Mitigate Acid Rock Drainage Risks while Recovering Valuable Coal from Ultrafine Colliery Waste. Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yunusa, I.A.M.; Erasmus, D.; DeSilva, D.L.; Murray, B.R.; Burchett, M.D.; Skilbeck, G.C.; Heidrich, C. Fly-ash: An exploitable resource for management of Australian agricultural soils. Fuel 2006, 85, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rai, G.K.; Bhat, B.A.; Mushtaq, M.; Tariq, L.; Rai, P.K.; Basu, U.; Dar, A.A.; Islam, S.T.; Dar, T.U.; Bhat, J.A. Insights into decontamination of soils by phytoremediation: A detailed account on heavy metal toxicity and mitigation strategies. J. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 287–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, C.; Quan, Q.; Gan, Y.; Dong, J.; Fang, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, J. Effects of heavy metals on microbial communities in sediments and establishment of bioindicators based on microbial taxa and function for environmental monitoring and management. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rios, C.A.; Williams, C.D.; Roberts, C.L. Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage (AMD) using coal fly ash, natural clinker, and synthetic zeolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aigbe, U.O.; Ukhurebor, K.E.; Onyancha, R.B.; Osibote, O.A.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Kusuma, H.S. Fly ash-based adsorbent for adsorption of heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution: A review. J. Mater. 2021, 14, 2751–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nemutanzhela, M.V.; Modise, D.M.; Siyoko, K.J.; Kanu, S.A. Assessment of Growth, Tuber Elemental Composition, Stomatal Conductance, and Chlorophyll Content of Two Potato Cultivars Under Irrigation with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage. Am. J. Potato Res. 2017, 94, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adeniyi, A.G.; Emenike, E.C.; Iwuozor, K.O.; Okoro, H.K.; Ige, O.O. Acid mine drainage: The footprint of the Nigeria mining industry. J. Chem. Africa 2022, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shaheen, S.M.; Hooda, P.S.; Tsadilas, C.D. Opportunities and challenges in the use of coal fly ash for soil improvements. A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 145, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ukwattage, N.L.; Ranjith, P.G.; Bouazza, M. The use of coal combustion fly ash as a soil amendment in agricultural lands (with comments on its potential to improve food security and sequester carbon). Fuel 2013, 109, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Frossard, E.; Bucher, M.; Mächler, F.; Mozafar, A.; Hurrell, R. Potential for increasing the content and bioavailability of Fe, Zn, and Ca in plants for human nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 861–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elfnesh, F.; Tekalign, T.; Solomon, W. Processing quality of improved potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars as influenced by growing environment and blanching. Afr. J. Food. Sci. 2011, 5, 324–332. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chatterjee, C.; Gopal, R.; Dube, B.K. Impact of iron stress on biomass, yield, metabolism, and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2006, 108, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farooq, M.; Anwar, F.; Rashid, U. Appraisal of heavy metal contents in different vegetables grown in the vicinity of an industrial area. Pak. J. Bot. 2008, 40, 2099–2106. [Google Scholar]
  27. Balistrieri, L.S.; Seal II, R.R.; Piatak, N.M.; Paul, B. Assessing the concentration, speciation, and toxicity of dissolved metals during mixing of acid-mine drainage and ambient river water downstream of the Elizabeth Copper Mine, Vermont, USA. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22, 930–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harmanescu, M.; Alda, L.M.; Bordean, D.M.; Gogoasa, I.; Gergen, I. Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, Romania. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibson, R.S.; Hotz, C. Dietary diversification/modification strategies to enhance micronutrient content and bioavailability of diets in developing countries. Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 85, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Onder, S.; Caliskan, M.E.; Onder, D.; Caliskan, S. Different irrigation methods, and water stress effects on potato yield and yield components. Agric. Water. Manag. 2005, 73, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lerna, A. Influence of harvest date on nitrate contents of three potato varieties for off-season production. J. Food. Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 551–555. [Google Scholar]
  32. Maier, N.A.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Heap, M.; Butt, M.; Smart, M.K. Effect of nitrogen source and calcitic lime on soil pH and potato yield, leaf chemical composition, and tuber cadmium concentrations. J. Plant Nutr. 2002, 25, 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogbonna, O.; Jimoh, W.L.; Awagu, E.F.; Bamishaiye, E.I. Determination of some trace elements in water samples within Kano Metropolis. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 2, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  34. Oguh, C.E.; Obiwulu, E.N.O. Human risk on heavy metal pollution and bioaccumulation factor in soil and some edible vegetables around active auto-mechanic workshop in Chanchaga Minna Niger state, Nigeria. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2020, 4, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ranjbar, G.; Kariminejad, F.; Jamali, J.; Shams, M.; Najafpoor, A.A.; Dehghan, A. Heavy metal concentration in water, soil and cultivated vegetables at the edge of Kashaf Roud River, Mashhad, Iran: Ecological risk assessment and bioaccumulation factor. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 25, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hussain, A.; Alamzeb, S.; Begum, S. Accumulation of heavy metals in edible parts of vegetables irrigated with wastewater and their daily intake to adults and children, District Mardan, Pakistan. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar]
  37. Maharia, R.S.; Dutta, R.K.; Acharya, R.; Reddy, A.V.R. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in selected medicinal plants collected from Khetri copper mines and comparison with those collected from fertile soil in Haridwar, India. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2010, 45, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdu, N.; Agbenin, J.O.; Buerkert, A. Phytoavailability, human risk assessment and transfer characteristics of cadmium and zinc contamination from urban gardens in Kano, Nigeria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2722–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Safarzadeh, S.; Ronaghi, A.; Karimian, N. Effect of cadmium toxicity on micronutrient concentration, uptake and partitioning in seven rice cultivars. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2013, 59, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saha, N.; Mollah, M.Z.I.; Alam, M.F.; Rahman, M.S. Seasonal investigation of heavy metals in marine fishes captured from the Bay of Bengal and the implications for human health risk assessment. Food Control 2016, 70, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoon, E.; Park, K.; Lee, H.; Yang, J.H.; Lee, C. Estimation of excess cancer risk on time-weighted lifetime average daily intake of PAHs from food ingestion. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. (HERA) 2007, 13, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Arcury, T.A.; Nguyen, H.T.; Summers, P.; Talton, J.W.; Holbrook, L.C.; Walker, F.O.; Chen, H.; Howard, T.D.; Galván, L.; Quandt, S.A. Lifetime and current pesticide exposure among Latino farmworkers in comparison to other Latino immigrants. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2014, 57, 776–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Amin, M.; Rahman, M.; Hossain, S.; Rahman, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Jakariya, M.; Sikder, M. Trace metals in vegetables and associated health risks in industrial areas of Savar, Bangladesh. J. Health Pollut. 2020, 10, 200905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Naughton, D.P.; Petróczi, A. Heavy metal ions in wines: Meta-analysis of target hazard quotients reveal health risks. Chem. Cent. J. 2008, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Miranzadeh Mahabadi, H.; Ramroudi, M.; Asgharipour, M.R.; Rahmani, H.R.; Afyuni, M. Assessment of heavy metals contamination and the risk of target hazard quotient in some vegetables in Isfahan. Pollution 2020, 6, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zheng, N.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S. Population health risk due to dietary intake of heavy metals in the industrial area of Huludao city, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 387, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bortey-Sam, N.; Nakayama, S.M.; Ikenaka, Y.; Akoto, O.; Baidoo, E.; Yohannes, Y.B.; Mizukawa, H.; Ishizuka, M. Human health risks from metals and metalloid via consumption of food animals near gold mines in Tarkwa, Ghana: Estimation of the daily intakes and target hazard quotients (THQs). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 111, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rajan, S.; Ishak, N.S. Estimation of target hazard quotients and potential health risks for metals by consumption of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Selangor, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2017, 46, 1825–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Han, B.C.; Jeng, W.L.; Chen, R.Y.; Fang, G.T.; Hung, T.C.; Tseng, R.J. Estimation of target hazard quotients and potential health risks for metals by consumption of seafood in Taiwan. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1998, 35, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ahmed, M.; Baki, M.A.; Islam, M.; Kundu, G.K.; Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M.; Sarkar, S.K.; Hossain, M. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in tropical fish and shellfish collected from the river Buriganga, Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zimmermann, M.B.; Hurrell, R.F. Improving iron, zinc and vitamin A nutrition through plant biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brown, P.H.; Welch, R.M.; Cary, E.E.; Checkai, R.T. Micronutrients: Beneficial effects of nickel on plant growth. J. Plant Nutr. 1987, 10, 2125–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, C.; Huang, D.; Liu, J. Functions and toxicity of nickel in plants: Recent advances and prospects. Clean Soil Air Water 2009, 37, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, M.U.; Zhou, T.H.; Zhang, R.F.; Sun, Q.H.; Xu, Y.W. Nutritional evaluation of different cultivars of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from China by grey relational analysis (GRA) and its application in potato steamed bread making. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 231–245. [Google Scholar]
  55. Aberoumand, A. Assay of Nutritional Potential of the Fruits of Solanum indicum L. in Iran. J. Agric. Technol. 2012, 8, 923–929. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dunbar, K.R.; Mclaughlin, M.J.; Reid, R.J. The uptake and partitioning of cadmium in two cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L). J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. McLaughlin, M.J.; Williams, C.M.J.; McKay, A.J.K.G.; Kirkham, R.J.K.G.; Gunton, J.J.K.G.; Jackson, K.J.; Thompson, R.; Dowling, B.; Partington, D.; Smart, M.K.; et al. Effect of cultivar on uptake of cadmium by potato tubers. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1994, 45, 1483–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sahoo, P.K.; Tripathy, S.; Panigrahi, M.K.; Equeenuddin, S. Evaluation of the use of an alkali modified fly ash as a potential adsorbent for the removal of metals from acid mine drainage. Appl. Water Sci. 2013, 3, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Keller, V.; Stopić, S.; Xakalashe, B.; Ma, Y.; Ndlovu, S.; Mwewa, B.; Simate, G.S.; Friedrich, B. Effectiveness of fly ash and red mud as strategies for sustainable acid mine drainage management. Minerals 2020, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Barrutia, O.; Epelde, L.; García-Plazaola, J.I.; Garbisu, C.; Becerril, J.M. Phytoextraction potential of two Rumex acetosa L. accessions collected from metalliferous and non-metalliferous sites: Effect of fertilization. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yalamanchali, R. Lithium, an Emerging Environmental Contaminant, is Mobile in the Soil-Plant System. Ph.D. Thesis, Lincoln University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rao, K.M.; Sresty, T.V.S. Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) in response to Zn and Ni stresses. Plant Sci. 2000, 157, 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mengist, M.F.; Milbourne, D.; Griffin, D.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Creedon, J.; Jones, P.W.; Alves, S. Cadmium uptake and partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars with different tuber-Cd concentration. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 27384–27391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pandey, N.; Sharma, C.P. Effect of heavy metals Co2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ on growth and metabolism of cabbage. Plant. Sci. 2002, 163, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Akubugwo, I.E.; Obasi, N.A.; Chinyere, G.C.; Ugbogu, A.E. Nutritional and chemical value of Amaranthus hybridus L. leaves from Afikpo, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 2833–2839. [Google Scholar]
  66. Gajewska, E.; SkŁodowska, M. Differential effect of equal copper, cadmium and nickel concentration on biochemical reactions in wheat seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2010, 73, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Öncel, I.; Keleş, Y.; Üstün, A. Interactive effects of temperature and heavy metal stress on the growth and some biochemical compounds in wheat seedlings. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 107, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. John, R.; Ahmad, P.; Gadgil, K.; Sharma, S. Heavy metal toxicity: Effect on plant growth, biochemical parameters, and metal accumulation by Brassica juncea L. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2009, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  69. Dimkpa, C.; Weinand, T.; Asch, F. Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hafeez, B.M.K.Y.; Khanif, Y.M.; Saleem, M. Role of zinc in plant nutrition-a review. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 2013, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ragályi, P.; Takács, T.; Füzy, A.; Uzinger, N.; Dobosy, P.; Záray, G.; Szűcs-Vásárhelyi, N.; Rékási, M. Effect of Se-Enriched Irrigation Water and Soil Texture on Biomass Production and Elemental Composition of Green Pea and Carrot and Their Contribution to Human Se Intake. Agriculture 2022, 12, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gebreselassie, H.; Wahassu, M.; Shimelis, B. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and yield components in Eastern Ethiopia. Evaluation 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  73. Solomon, F.; Asrat, A.; Daniel, T.; Zenebe, G.M.; Eshetu, A. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and yield components. J. Hortic. 2019, 11, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tessema, L.; Mohammed, W.; Abebe, T. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and some agronomic traits. Open Agric. 2020, 5, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Alemayehu, T.G.; Miilion, P.M.; Seman, A.S. Evaluation of growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties at Bule, Southern Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bilate, B.; Mulualem, T. Performance evaluation of released and farmers’ potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties in eastern Ethiopia. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cabello, R.; De Mendiburu, F.; Bonierbale, M.; Monneveux, P.; Roca, W.; Chujoy, E. Large-scale evaluation of potato improved varieties, genetic stocks and landraces for drought tolerance. Am. J. Potato Res. 2012, 89, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saleh, S.R.; Kandeel, M.M.; Ghareeb, D.; Ghoneim, T.M.; Talha, N.I.; Alaoui-Sossé, B.; Aleya, L.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Wheat biological responses to stress caused by cadmium, nickel and lead. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 706, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bor, M.; Seckin, B.; Ozgur, R.; Yılmaz, O.; Ozdemir, F.; Turkan, I. Comparative effects of drought, salt, heavy metal and heat stresses on gamma-aminobutryric acid levels of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nazima, B.; Manoharan, V.; Miltonprabu, S. Grape seed proanthocyanidins ameliorates cadmium-induced renal injury and oxidative stress in experimental rats through the up-regulation of nuclear related factor 2 and antioxidant responsive elements. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 93, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jackson, A.P.; Alloway, B.J. The transfer of cadmium from agricultural soils to the human food chain. JTEMIN 2017, 28, 121–170. [Google Scholar]
  82. Thévenod, F.; Wolff, N.A. Iron transport in the kidney: Implications for physiology and cadmium nephrotoxicity. Metallomics 2016, 8, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Prozialeck, W.C.; Vaidya, V.S.; Liu, J.; Waalkes, M.P.; Edwards, J.R.; Lamar, P.C.; Bernard, A.M.; Dumont, X.; Bonventre, J.V. Kidney injury molecule-1 is an early biomarker of cadmium nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int. 2007, 72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Gu, J.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, J.; Peprah, F.A.; Xie, Y.; Cheng, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wong, C.K.C.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Calcimimetic compound NPS R-467 protects against chronic cadmium-induced mouse kidney injury by restoring autophagy process. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pan, J.; Plant, J.A.; Voulvoulis, N.; Oates, C.J.; Ihlenfeld, C. Cadmium levels in Europe: Implications for human health. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nordberg, G.F.; Bernard, A.; Diamond, G.L.; Duffus, J.H.; Illing, P.; Nordberg, M.; Bergdahl, I.A.; Jin, T.; Skerfving, S. Risk assessment of effects of cadmium on human health (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 90, 755–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Prasad, B.; Mortimer, R.J. Treatment of acid mine drainage using fly ash zeolite. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 218, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jones, S.N.; Cetin, B. Evaluation of waste materials for acid mine drainage remediation. Fuel 2017, 188, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Roy, M. Phytoreclamation of abandoned acid mine drainage site after treatment with fly ash. In Phytorestoration of Abandoned Mining and Oil Drilling Sites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 167–206. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bäckström, M.; Sartz, L. Mixing of acid rock drainage with alkaline ash leachates—Fate and immobilisation of trace elements. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 222, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gitari, W.M.; Petrik, L.F.; Etchebers, O.; Key, D.L.; Iwuoha, E.; Okujeni, C. Passive neutralisation of acid mine drainage by fly ash and its derivatives: A column leaching study. Fuel 2008, 87, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Adejumo, S.A.; Ogundiran, M.B.; Togun, A.O. Soil amendment with compost and crop growth stages influenced heavy metal uptake and distribution in maize crop grown on lead-acid battery waste contaminated soil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ighalo, J.O.; Kurniawan, S.B.; Iwuozor, K.O.; Aniagor, C.O.; Ajala, O.J.; Oba, S.N.; Iwuchukwu, F.U.; Ahmadi, S.; Igwegbe, C.A. A review of treatment technologies for the mitigation of the toxic environmental effects of acid mine drainage (AMD). Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 157, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gibson, R.S.; Perlas, L.; Hotz, C. Improving the bioavailability of nutrients in plant foods at the household level. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2006, 65, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fageria, N.K.; Baligar, V.C.; Li, Y.C. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Salgueiro, M.J.; Zubillaga, M.; Lysionek, A.; Sarabia, M.I.; Caro, R.; De Paoli, T.; Hager, A.; Weill, R.; Boccio, J. Zinc as an essential micronutrient: A review. Nutr. Res. 2000, 20, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pandey, V.C.; Abhilash, P.C.; Singh, N. The Indian perspective of utilizing fly ash in phytoremediation, phytomanagement and biomass production. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2943–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sadeghzadeh, B. A review of zinc nutrition and plant breeding. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 13, 905–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wessels, I.; Rink, L. Micronutrients in autoimmune diseases: Possible therapeutic benefits of zinc and vitamin D. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2020, 77, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Christian, P. Micronutrients and reproductive health issues: An international perspective. Nutr. J. 2003, 133, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Brengi, S.H.; El-Gindy, A.G.M.; El-Sharkawy, I.; Abouelsaad, I.A. Variation in cadmium accumulation among potato cultivars grown on different agricultural sites: A potential tool for reducing cadmium in tubers. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Larsson Jönsson, E.H.; Asp, H. Influence of nitrogen supply on cadmium accumulation in potato tubers. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Arévalo-Hernández, C.O.; Arévalo-Gardini, E.; Barraza, F.; Farfán, A.; He, Z.; Baligar, V. Growth and nutritional responses of wild and domesticated cacao genotypes to soil Cd stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mengist, M.F.; Milbourne, D.; Griffin, D.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Creedon, J.; Jones, P.W.; Alves, S. Zinc uptake and partitioning in two potato cultivars: Implications for biofortification. Plant Soil. 2021, 463, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yan, B.F.; Nguyen, C.; Pokrovsky, O.S.; Candaudap, F.; Coriou, C.; Bussiere, S.; Robert, T.; Cornu, J.Y. Contribution of remobilization to the loading of cadmium in durum wheat grains: Impact of post-anthesis nitrogen supply. Plant Soil. 2018, 424, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Leonardi, C.; Toscano, V.; Genovese, C.; Mosselmans, J.F.W.; Ngwenya, B.T.; Raccuia, S.A. Evaluation of cadmium and arsenic effects on wild and cultivated cardoon genotypes selected for metal phytoremediation and bioenergy purposes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Retamal-Salgado, J.; Matus, I.; Walter, I.; Hirzel, J. Absorption and distribution of cadmium of three maize hybrids in three environments. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2017, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Brown, S.P.; Grillo, M.A.; Podowski, J.C.; Heath, K.D. Soil origin and plant genotype structure distinct microbiome compartments in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Microbiome 2020, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. White, P.J. Long-distance transport in the xylem and phloem. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  110. Sterckeman, T.; Thomine, S. Mechanisms of cadmium accumulation in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2020, 39, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Martinka, M.; Vaculík, M.; Lux, A. Plant cell responses to cadmium and zinc. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 2014, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental layout in greenhouse (C) and symptoms of metal toxicity (D) (initiation of discolouration in leaf margins) in both cultivars (Fianna (A) and Lady rosetta (B)), exposed to irrigation with FA-treated AMD treatments.
Figure 1. Experimental layout in greenhouse (C) and symptoms of metal toxicity (D) (initiation of discolouration in leaf margins) in both cultivars (Fianna (A) and Lady rosetta (B)), exposed to irrigation with FA-treated AMD treatments.
Horticulturae 09 00192 g001
Figure 2. Concentration of heavy metals in the stem during growth of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage.
Figure 2. Concentration of heavy metals in the stem during growth of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage.
Horticulturae 09 00192 g002
Figure 3. Concentration of heavy metals in the new leaves (A) and old leaves (B) during growth of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage.
Figure 3. Concentration of heavy metals in the new leaves (A) and old leaves (B) during growth of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage.
Horticulturae 09 00192 g003
Figure 4. Soil-Plant Transfer Coefficient % (TC) of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage water. Values (Mean ± S.E).
Figure 4. Soil-Plant Transfer Coefficient % (TC) of Fianna and Lady rosetta cultivar irrigated with acid mine drainage water. Values (Mean ± S.E).
Horticulturae 09 00192 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raletsena, M.V.; Mongalo, N.I.; Munyai, R. Heavy Metal Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020192

AMA Style

Raletsena MV, Mongalo NI, Munyai R. Heavy Metal Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(2):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raletsena, Maropeng Vellry, Nkoana Ishmael Mongalo, and Rabelani Munyai. 2023. "Heavy Metal Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage" Horticulturae 9, no. 2: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020192

APA Style

Raletsena, M. V., Mongalo, N. I., & Munyai, R. (2023). Heavy Metal Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars irrigated with Fly Ash-Treated Acid Mine Drainage. Horticulturae, 9(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop