Next Article in Journal
Insight into the Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolutionary History of Pepper Cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.) through Comparative Analyses of Plastomes
Next Article in Special Issue
LED White Light Treatment Delays Postharvest Senescence of ‘Zaosu’ Pear Fruit with Inhibited Chlorophyll Degradation
Previous Article in Journal
Forcing Temperature Effects on Plant Development for Containerized Blackberry Grown Using Long-Cane Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Combinatorial TIR1-Aux/IAA Co-Receptor System for Peach Fruit Softening
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/horticulturae9101091
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bibliometrics and Visual Analysis of Non-Destructive Testing Technology for Fruit Quality

by
Peng Ni
1,2,
Hao Niu
1,2,*,
Yurong Tang
1,2,
Yabo Zhang
1,2,
Wenyang Zhang
1,2,
Yang Liu
1,2 and
Haipeng Lan
1,2
1
Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
2
College of Mechanical Electrification Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(10), 1091; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101091
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 20 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 30 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Postharvest Fruit Quality and Physiological Mechanism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study examined the development and trends in non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality. The status of the research field and the application hotspots were investigated to provide a reference for future research in this field. Relevant studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality published between 1993 and 2022 were identified in the core database Web of Science. The temporal distribution, spatial distribution, literature features, research progress, and leading research hotspots were quantified and visualised using bibliometrics. The findings revealed that there continues to be active research and publications on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality, with a good development trend. China and the USA are the major contributors to research on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality. The major research institutions include Zhejiang University and the United States Department of Agriculture. The major papers are published in Postharvest Biology and Technology and Acta Horticulturae, among others. These studies mainly focus on agriculture, food, and gardening, among other topics. The detection indices mainly concern internal quality, such as sugar degree and soluble solids, and apparent quality, such as hardness. The detection technologies mainly include electronic nose (E-nose) technology, machine vision technology, and spectral detection technology. In the future, technological developments in artificial intelligence and deep learning will further promote the maturation and application of non-destructive testing technologies for fruit quality.

1. Introduction

Fruits are an indispensable part of the human diet due to their rich nutrients and sweet taste. The increasing consumer demand for fruits, and their central role in a healthy diet, have contributed to the societal appreciation of high-quality fruits, which has led to increased research interest in the detection of fruit quality [1]. At present, fruit quality detection is restricted by the low efficiency of the available detection devices, the inapplicability of destructive testing technologies, and the low generalisation rate of non-destructive testing technologies. As a result, fruit quality grades are mixed, and insignificant price differences exist among different levels of fruits, resulting in damage to brand value [2]. Hence, there is a critical need to develop fruit quality detection technology within the forest and fruit industry to increase the economic value and market competitiveness of fruits.
Traditionally, fruit quality detection methods have mainly included the subjective experience-based judgement of orchard workers or the detection of the physiochemical properties of fruits based on local samples. However, the former approach is time-consuming and requires a large labour force for large-scale fruit detection; it also lacks uniform standards for accuracy. The latter approach can damage fruits and is limited by its detection cost and time requirements. As such, it is not suitable for large-scale fruit detection. To solve the above problems and meet the demands for fruit quality detection, non-destructive testing technologies are currently being developed. Non-destructive testing technology involves the application of external stimuli to test samples and the examination of the transmitted and reflected physical indices of the test objects [3]. The chemical and physical properties of the test samples can be evaluated without damaging the original state of the samples. Since non-destructive testing technology is simple, fast, highly efficient, and non-destructive, it has been extensively applied to fruit quality testing [4]. Common non-destructive testing methods for fruit quality include optical property detection [5,6,7], the machine vision test [8,9], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [10,11], the acoustic feature test [12,13], the mechanical property test [14,15], the dielectric property test [16,17], the e-nose test [18,19], and so on. Examining the research status and leading hotspots in the field of non-destructive testing technology can provide a reference for the future development of non-destructive testing methods for fruit quality. Bibliometrics refers to the science of quantitative analysis of the literature in a certain research field, which has the characteristics of objectivity, quantification, and modeling. It plays an important role in uncovering hotspots in research fields and identifying future research directions. Bibliometrics has been widely applied to many fields, including agriculture, economy, and ecology, among others [20,21].
In this study, a quantitative analysis of the research progress and development trend in the non-destructive testing of fruit quality was performed. Studies related to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality published between 1993 and 2022 were identified and analysed using bibliometrics. High-frequency keywords related to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality were analysed using the CiteSpace and Hiplot Pro visual literature analysis tools. The research progress and leading hotspots in the non-destructive testing of fruits were analysed [22].

2. Data Sources and Research Methods

2.1. Data Sources

All data for this study were derived from the core database Web of Science. This database has groundbreaking content, high-quality data, and a long history. It covers the most important and influential studies in the relevant research field [23].
Relevant non-destructive testing technologies for common fruits (e.g., peach, pear, and apple) were employed as the search terms. Specifically, the search terms were TI = (“apple*” OR “pear*” OR “peach*” OR “fruit*”) AND TI = (“Nondestructive*” OR “optical*” OR “visible*” OR “infrared*” OR “spectra*” OR “spectroscopy*” OR “vision*” OR “acoustic*” OR “scattering*” OR “mechanical*” OR “vibration*” OR “nuclear magnetic resonance*” OR “NMR*” OR “hardness*” OR “elasticity*” OR “impulse*” OR “dielectric*” OR “microwave drying*” OR “electronic noses*”) NOT TS = (“tree*” OR “leaf*” OR “root*” OR “pest*” OR “disease*” OR “fruit fly*” OR “ juice*” OR “pearl*” OR “Pearson*” OR “ cell*” OR “slice*”). Studies not relevant to the research topic, for example, where “peach” referred to “peach blossom” or “impulse” referred to “a sudden strong and unreflective urge or desire to act”, were deleted.
More than 1400 studies published between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2022 were collected for bibliometric analysis. Subsequent search results may differ slightly due to updating of the database. Quantity changes may have a slight influence on the final research conclusions. Data searching was terminated on 8 May 2023.

2.2. Research Methods

The quantitative analysis of the identified studies was carried out using bibliometrics. The number of relevant studies and the development trends in non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality were analysed using Excel statistics. The statistical analysis of high-publication institutions, high-publication journals, frequently cited studies, and high-frequency keywords was carried out. A keyword clustering map, emergence map, time map, common creation country/region field Chordal graph, and keyword–journal double mode matrix were plotted using the knowledge mapping visualisation software CiteSpace (CiteSpace. 6.2.R2. March 2023. Chaomei Chen, Professor, Institute of Computer and Information Science, Drexel University, USA, https://citespace.podia.com/download accessed on 27 March 2023) and the visual analysis platform Hiplot Pro (https://hiplot.com.cn/home/index.html accessed on 27 March 2023). The temporal and spatial developments in the non-destructive testing of fruit quality were reviewed and visualised.

3. Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Identified Studies

The distributions of the identified studies in terms of time, space, and source were examined. The development timeline was investigated, and the major research countries/regions and institutions were analysed. The key publications and most influential studies in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality were identified.

3.1. Temporal Distribution

The quantity of publications in different years reflects the attention of researchers to the topic of non-destructive testing of fruit quality, to some extent. It also reflects the development process of the field and subjects [24]. The annual quantity of published papers on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality in the top 10 countries, and the publication growth trend, are shown in Figure 1.
It can be seen from Figure 1 that the number of publications generally exhibited an increasing trend over the study period. The germination stage was evident from 1993 to 2014. At this time, few scholars studied the non-destructive testing of fruit quality, and these scholars were from a limited number of countries. However, there were many high-quality studies. For instance, Peris A et al. (2001) conducted a non-destructive test of the internal quality and optimal harvest period of apples using visible–near-infrared (Vis–NIR) spectral technology [25]. Li et al. (2002), from China Agriculture University, developed a new automatic screening experimental system for apple surface defects based on computer image technology. This system was able to simultaneously test and screen the four side surfaces of each apple online and was found to have relatively high practicability and feasibility [26]. Bart et al. (2007) reviewed the application of new technologies for fruit quality detection, such as spectral resolution spectra, near-infrared multispectral technology, and hyperspectral imaging technology. These technologies are highly relevant to the application of spectral technologies to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality [27]. Over time, the number of relevant papers increased slowly, year by year. An increasing number of scholars published papers in this field.
The stable stage was evident from 2014 to 2019. The number of research papers from China, Malaysia, and Belgium markedly increased, but the total quantity of relevant research papers exhibited little change. Cen et al. (2016) detected cold damage in cucumbers through hyperspectral imaging technology by combining feature selection and a supervised classification algorithm. They demonstrated the potential of hyperspectral imaging technology for cold damage detection in fruits [28]. Arendse et al. (2018) demonstrated that near-infrared spectra are feasible for studying the internal quality of fruits with thick pericarps [29]. Bhargava et al. (2018) carried out a critical comparison of several detection algorithms for fruit and vegetable quality proposed by researchers in recent years [30]. Zhang et al. (2014) described the latest development of a computer vision system for the external quality detection of fruits and vegetables and discussed its applications [31]. This particular study offers important guidance for the application of machine vision technology to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality.
Finally, the research field was observed to be in a fast development stage from 2019 to 2022. The number of publications increased significantly. More than 100 papers were published in 2020. The integrated application of multiple technologies was a prominent characteristic of the published research on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality during this stage. For example, Kasampalis Dimitrios et al. (2021) evaluated the nutritional quality of pepper using colour, chlorophyll fluorescence, visible–near-infrared (Vis–NIR) spectra, red–green–blue (R–G–B) and red–green–near-infrared (R–G–NIR) digital imaging technology [32]. Tang et al. (2020) reviewed the application and research progress of harvest robots and vision technology in the harvest of fruits and described the fruit recognition and positioning technology based on digital image processing technology and deep learning algorithms. Moreover, they proposed future development trends in machine vision [33]. Wan et al. (2020) proposed a deep learning framework for the detection of different fruits based on an improved Faster R-CNN and evaluated its performance [34]. The development of digital image technology and deep learning technology has injected new vitality into studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality. It is expected that the number of publications will significantly increase in future years.

3.2. Spatial Distribution

3.2.1. Countries/Region

To determine the influential countries/regions in the field of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality, and evaluate their cooperative relations, a chordal graph of countries/regions was plotted with Hiplot Pro. The node size expresses the quantity of studies, and the connected lines between two nodes express the cooperative relations. It can be seen from Figure 2 that more than 70 countries/regions have participated in this research field. Asia, Europe, and North America were the major contributors. This might be related to national policy orientations, economic development levels, agricultural development levels, and the climatic and geographical conditions being appropriate for the local development of the forest and fruit industry [35]. There was relatively frequent cooperation between China and the USA, between the USA and Canada, and between Spain and Iran. The top five countries/regions in terms of the number of publications were China, the USA, Spain, Italy, and Japan, which published 361 (25.79%), 199 (14.21%), 99 (7.07%), 98 (7%), and 91 (6.5%) papers, respectively. China accounted for 25.79% of papers, more than one-quarter of the total studies. This is mainly attributed to China’s attention to agricultural development and the formulation and implementation of multiple supporting policies in recent years. In the “14th Five-Year Plan” of promoting agricultural and rural modernisation, China proposed the promotion of “diversified development of fruits, vegetables and tea, developing facility agriculture, and developing unique industries like forest and fruit industry, traditional Chinese medicines and edible mushrooms according to local conditions” [36]. Since 2020, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and the Ministry of Finance have been constructing dominant and unique industrial clusters, and have included 16 fruit industrial clusters in the construction range [37]. In 2021, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs printed the “14th Five-Year Plan” on the Implementation Scheme of “Three Quality Indices and One Standard” in the planting industry, which aims to improve the development quality benefits and competitiveness of industries such as the fruit industry [38]. Scientific research funds for the forest and fruit industry have also continued to increase, bringing annual growth in the contribution of forest and fruit studies to academic development. There is no doubt that other countries have also made considerable contributions to the research progress on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality. It is likely that further developments in the non-destructive testing of fruit quality in the future will rely on collaborative endeavours between multiple countries and regions.
In summary, a country’s economic level is the basis for the development of non-destructive testing of fruit quality. Compared with economically underdeveloped countries/regions, economically developed ones have published more in-depth studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality and have achieved more research progress. Nevertheless, a high economic development level alone cannot bring considerable development to the field. This is because policy orientation determines the continuous economic inputs of the country/region to the field. Hence, development in the non-destructive testing of fruit quality cannot occur without economic support and policy guidance. Moreover, transbackground and transnational cooperation is conducive to the cooperation between different teams, facilitating leaps and diversified development in the field.

3.2.2. Institutions and Units

According to the analysis, more than 300 institutions were involved in studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality between 1993 and 2022. These institutions have made considerable contributions to the development of non-destructive testing technologies for fruit quality. The top 10 institutions in terms of the number of publications on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality in the Web of Science are listed in Table 1. Chinese and American institutions accounted for 7 of these 10 institutions, reflecting these countries’ attention to and continuous efforts in this field. It is important to note that Zhejiang University achieved the most relevant scientific publications, with 71 papers published during the study period, accounting for 5.07% of the total publications. The United States Department of Agriculture published 63 papers, accounting for 4.5% of the total, ranking second.
Among the global research institutions, Zhejiang University had the highest publication number in the Web of Science. This implies that the contribution of Zhejiang University to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality in China has been the most significant. This institution has strong scientific research power and an extremely strong influence on the field. The top 10 institutions comprised 6 universities and 4 research institutions. Based on the international scientific and technological development trend, the continued strengthening of scientific research cooperation among universities, research institutions, and enterprises is needed. This will facilitate the transformation of scientific research achievements.

3.3. Source Distribution

3.3.1. High-Publication Journals

Journals are the most important source of academic developments and scientific reports. Hot journals in the field can be identified by analysing the distribution of publications in journals. This is also applicable to the tracking of information in the most recently published studies. Journal distribution analysis is highly relevant to the information acquisition of researchers [39]. The top 10 journals in terms of the number of publications on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality in the Web of Science database are listed in Table 2. All journals published more than 20 papers. Specifically, Postharvest Biology and Technology, a journal from the Netherlands, achieved the top rank, with 85 papers (6%); this publication number is far higher than those of the other journals. Thus, this journal is the most influential journal in the field.
The above journals encompass several research fields, such as agriculture, food, optics, computer science, biology, gardening, etc. This means that the non-destructive testing of fruit quality is a multidisciplinary research field, and its development requires strengthened cooperation, exploration, and common progress across multiple disciplines.

3.3.2. High-Citation Studies

The frequency of citation is an important evaluation index that provides an objective measure of the research influence, citation value, and degree of attention a paper has received in the field. A higher frequency of citations indicates higher attention to the paper and greater influence of the paper within scientific communication. High-citation studies are often those that focus on hotspot themes in the field, providing a guide on the academic frontier of the field. Analysing the high-citation studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality can provide researchers with a reference for the future research direction of the field. The top 10 high-citation studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality are listed in Table 3; all papers were cited more than 240 times.
In the Web of Science, “DeepFruits: A Fruit Detection System Using Deep Neural Networks”, a study published by Sa, Inkyu et al. in 2016, was cited the most. This study proposed an accurate, fast, and reliable real-time fruit detection method based on deep convolutional neural networks [40]. According to the research results, the proposed detection method not only improves detection accuracy but can also be deployed to new fruit detection systems quickly. It began to attract significant attention after 2019, and the annual number of citations exceeded 100. The second most cited paper, “Apple Detection During Different Growth Stages in Orchards Using the Improved YOLO-V3 Model”, was published by Tian et al. in 2019. In this study, an improved YOLO-V3 model was proposed for fruit quality detection under complicated conditions, such as illumination fluctuations, disordered backgrounds, overlapping apples, and different maturity stages [41]. This study also attracted extensive attention after 2019. This indicates that neural network technology became popular and began to attract significant attention in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality around 2019. Furthermore, “Advances in Machine Vision Applications for Automatic Inspection and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables”, a study published by Sergio Cubero in 2010, reviewed the development trend in machine vision technology for the internal and external quality inspection of fruits and vegetables [42]. This study has a high guiding role and reference value for the future study of non-destructive testing technologies for fruit quality.
These 10 studies have had significant influences on this research field. Their research directions and methods are representative. It is important to note that 5 of these 10 studies were published in the top 10 journals, and 3 were published in Postharvest Biology and Technology. This indicates that journals with a high number of publications on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality are associated with high-citation publications, to some extent. This also verifies that Postharvest Biology and Technology is the most influential journal in the field. Moreover, the top 10 high-citation research hotspots in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality included spectral detection technology, machine vision technology, and neural networks. Common research indices included physical properties (e.g., the degree of maturity and hardness) and internal fruit quality (e.g., soluble solid content).

4. Research Progress and Leading Hotspots

Keywords in academic papers are tags indicating the research core and subject information. They provide a high-level summary of the major contents of a paper and can be used to identify the content characteristics and academic research direction of a paper. Here, clustering analysis and emergency analysis of the keywords, terms, and subject terms of studies on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality were carried out using CiteSpace. Based on this analysis, the overall research progress in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality was analysed, the current research hotspots were identified, and the future development trend was predicted.

4.1. Statistical Analysis of Keywords

A statistical analysis of the frequency of keywords in high-publication journals was carried out. A high-frequency keyword–journal clustering tree was plotted by combining the high-frequency keywords with the high-publication journals (Figure 3). Furthermore, a hierarchical clustering analysis of high-frequency keywords and high-frequency journals was carried out. The hierarchical clustering analysis based on the bimodule matrix effectively improves the single-dimensional analysis of the traditional system clustering algorithm, achieving simultaneous clustering of topic keywords and journals [43]. The vertical clustering tree reveals the clustering results of high-frequency keywords, with 15 high-frequency keywords listed at the bottom of the graph. The horizontal clustering tree illustrates the clustering results of high-publication journals, with 12 high-publication journals listed on the right of the graph. Each box represents the high-frequency keyword–journal corresponding to the column and row. The colour depth reflects the frequency of co-occurrence in publications. The clustering results were interpreted, and hotspot research directions and popular journal groups in relation to the non-destructive testing of fruit quality were summarised.
Keywords that occurred frequently included apple, fruit, classification, quality, properties, prediction, and non-destructive measurement. This agrees well with the research topic of this study. Keywords like image, identification, spectroscopy, reflectance, and model also occurred relatively frequently. This demonstrates that these are currently popular research methods in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality. Moreover, words like firmness, sugar content, and soluble solids also occurred frequently, indicating that these are quality indices of interest in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality.
The research hotspots in this field can be divided into three main categories: (I) image recognition technology (image, classification, and identification); (II) general research objects and contents, including fruit, apple, non-destructive measurement, quality, properties, prediction, and firmness; and (III) traditional research methods and detection indices, including model, reflectance, spectroscopy, sugar content, and soluble solids. The journals can be divided into two major types according to the disciplines: (A) agriculture, food, and electronics; and (B) biology and gardening.

4.2. Clustering Maps of Keywords

A range of research topics were observed in the literature regarding the non-destructive testing of fruit quality. In this study, a clustering analysis of high-frequency keywords in relevant papers was carried out to identify the key research problems.
Clustering analysis of keywords is performed to investigate the contributions of keywords in relevant papers and the close relations among keywords. It is used to identify the core contents and structure of a specific field. The clustering analysis of keywords in relevant studies was carried out using CiteSpace. Nine colour-distinguished clustering maps were generated, as shown in Figure 4. The font size of the tags of the nodes represents the frequency. The quantity and width of the connecting lines represent the co-occurrence intensity among keywords. A smaller clustering number indicates that more keywords are included, and content closer to the centre of the cluster is more important.
Clustering tags were divided into two types according to meaning: research object (#0 soluble solid content; #2 bioactive compounds; #3 dielectric properties; #4 fruit quality; and #5 absorption coefficient) and research method (#1 image processing; #6 performance liquid chromatography; #7 neural networks; and #8 drying).

4.3. Emergency Analysis of Keywords

An emergency word is one where the value of the keyword increases sharply into a hotspot over a short period. The emergency intensity of a keyword is proportional to the activity of the represented topic in the corresponding period. Here, an emergency analysis of keywords in relevant studies was carried out using CiteSpace. The results are shown in Figure 5. Deep learning, soluble solids, sugar content, internal quality, phenolic compounds, machine vision, and system were identified as emergency keywords with widespread interest and significant influence in this academic field. Moreover, the activity of the keywords corresponds with the growth trend of publications in Figure 1.

4.4. Temporal Analysis of Keywords

To further clearly and intuitively examine the development history of research on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality, a temporal map of keywords was plotted using CiteSpace (Figure 6). The temporal map depicts keywords included in the clustering according to time. Each box in Figure 6 represents a keyword and the year of its first occurrence in the dataset. The box size represents the frequency of occurrence of the keyword, and the lines among keywords represent their connections. The development veins within the field of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality were analysed. In combination with the number of publications and occurrence of keywords, the veins and leading points were further studied according to the time nodes and keywords.
The hotspot evolution of emergency keywords in Figure 5 and the growth trend of publications in Figure 1 were combined. The co-occurrence map of keywords was divided into three stages according to the timeline: the germination stage (1993–2014), the stable stage (2014–2019), and the development stage (since 2019). In the germination stage, texture analysis [44], sugar refractometry [45], analysis methods using optical instruments [46], and other traditional methods were used to test the physical properties (e.g., hardness) [47] and internal quality (e.g., sugar degree [48], soluble solids [49], and phenolic compound content [50]) of fruits. It is important to note that machine vision technology [51] began to be used for the inspection of the external quality of fruits in 1998. In the stable stage, most studies applied e-nose [52], diffuse reflection [53], and near-infrared spectra [54] technologies. Machine vision technology [55] was further developed. In the development stage, neural networks and deep learning technologies were developed and integrated with traditional technologies like machine vision and spectra [56,57,58]. This injected new vitality into the field of non-destructive testing technologies for fruit quality.

5. Conclusions

Journal papers on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality published in the Web of Science database between 1993 and 2022 were identified in this study. Using bibliometrics, the quantitative distribution and sources of the relevant studies were analysed. The research contents, content progress, leading hotspots, and development trends in the field of non-destructive testing of fruit quality were summarised based on knowledge maps. Moreover, the research dynamics in the field were investigated. The major conclusions are outlined below:
(1)
Studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality were in the germination stage from 1993 to 2014. There were few published papers from a limited number of countries in 1993. Over time, the number of related papers gradually increased, year by year. More countries began to investigate and publish studies on the non-destructive testing of fruit quality. The field was in the stable stage from 2014 to 2019. During this time, there was continuous publication of relevant research papers. Finally, there was sharp growth in the number of studies from 2019 to 2022. Significant growth in the field is expected over the next few years.
(2)
Research on non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality has mainly concentrated in Asia, North America, and Europe. China and the USA are the most active countries in this field. Furthermore, there has been close cooperation between China and the USA, the USA and Canada, and Spain and Iran. Continuous capital funding and policy support from these countries in addition to good transnational cooperation will further facilitate the diversified development of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality.
(3)
Major research institutions that have published in this field include Zhejiang University, the United States Department of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, the Ministry of Agriculture Rural Affairs, and so on. Zhejiang University has made a remarkable contribution and has a significant influence on the field.
(4)
Relevant studies in the field have mainly been published in Postharvest Biology and Technology, Acta Horticulture, Horticulturae, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, and so on. They have mainly been focused on agriculture, food, electronics, biology, gardening, etc.
(5)
The primary evaluation indices in the published studies include internal quality (e.g., sugar degree and soluble solids) and physical properties (e.g., hardness). The research methods mainly include e-nose technology, machine vision technology, and spectral detection technology (including hyperspectra and visible/near-infrared spectra), etc. Recently, neural networks and deep learning have undergone significant development. They have been combined with spectral technology and machine vision technology. As a result, non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality has entered a new development stage.
This paper provides an overview of the data recorded in the Web of Science on non-destructive testing of fruit quality from 1993 to 2022 for a total of 30 years, mainly relying on the pioneering content of the Web of Science, high-quality data, long history, and authority, covering the most important and influential research in related research fields [59]. However, a variety of disciplines may also be included in other databases, resulting in data omissions [60]. Therefore, even if the use of multiple databases will bring problems such as overlapping samples, it should also be considered so as to expand the research scope, which is an aspect that should be considered in future bibliometric research [61].
There is currently significant research and publication activity in the field of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality. There remains a good development trend. Studies on the application of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality to agricultural production and agricultural product processing are becoming increasingly mature. In particular, non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality has promising application prospects in agricultural product processing, and its application is booming. Moreover, technological developments, such as sensors, the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, machine vision, artificial intelligence, and deep learning will promote the maturity and application of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality. This technology can also be applied to the whole process of fruit production, transportation, and marketing, meeting the market needs for fruit quality detection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.N.; methodology, Y.T.; software, P.N.; investigation, Y.Z.; resources, W.Z.; data curation, H.N.; writing—original draft preparation, P.N.; writing—review and editing, P.N. and H.N.; visualisation, Y.T.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, Y.L. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the President’s Fund of Tarim University (No. TDZKSS202109) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32202139).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hong Zhang from Tarim University for thesis supervision. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, S.; Huang, X.; Lu, H. Advancements and Applications of Raman Spectroscopy in Rapid Quality and Safety Detection of Fruits and Vegetables. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, L.; Xin, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Yong, L.; Shuang, H. Research progress of nondestructive testing techniques for fruit and vegetable quality. J. Zhejiang Univ. 2020, 46, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xin, Z.; Wei, W. Study on Nondestructive Measurement of Fruit Quality based on Microwave Dielectric Properties. China Food Saf. Mag. 2022, 20, 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yousef, A.; Sajad, S.; Mario, H.; Jose, L.; Farzad, A. Nondestructive Estimation of the Chlorophyll b of Apple Fruit by Color and Spectral Features Using Different Methods of Hybrid Artificial Neural Network. Agronomy 2019, 9, 735. [Google Scholar]
  5. Minas, S.; Anthony, M.; Pieper, J.; Sterle, G. Large-scale and accurate non-destructive visual to near infrared spectroscopy-based assessment of the effect of rootstock on peach fruit internal quality. Eur. J. Agron. 2023, 143, 126706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ho, S.; Jang, S.; Zhong, C. Detection of Internal Browning Disorder in ‘Greensis’ Pears Using a Portable Non-Destructive Instrument. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 944. [Google Scholar]
  7. Guglielmo, C.; Lorenzo, R.; Brian, F.; Nicola, B.; Francesco, S.; Serena, V.; Varit, S.; Mantana, B.; Chalermchai, W.; Sirichai, K.; et al. Use of Nondestructive Devices to Support Pre- and Postharvest Fruit Management. Horticulturae 2016, 3, 12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guang, H.; En, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Jian, Z.; Ze, G.; Sugirbay, A.; Hong, J.; Shuo, Z.; Jun, C. Infield Apple Detection and Grading Based on Multi-Feature Fusion. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 276. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ji, C.; Jia, W.; Zhi, W.; Hu, Q.; Gan, C.; Cheng, T.; Chao, Z. Detecting ripe fruits under natural occlusion and illumination conditions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106450. [Google Scholar]
  10. Migues, I.; Rivas, F.; Moyna, G.; Kelly, D.; Heinzen, H. Predicting Mandarin Fruit Acceptability: From High-Field to Benchtop NMR Spectroscopy. Foods 2022, 11, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tristán, I.; Abreu, C.; Aguilera, M.; Peña, A.; Conesa, A.; Fernández, I. Evaluation of ORAC, IR and NMR metabolomics for predicting ripening stage and variety in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arai, N.; Miyake, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Kajiwara, I.; Hosoya, N. Soft Mango Firmness Assessment Based on Rayleigh Waves Generated by a Laser-Induced Plasma Shock Wave Technique. Foods 2021, 10, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sandra, L.; Leon, T. Non-destructive discrimination of avocado fruit ripeness using laser Doppler vibrometry. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 194, 251–260. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhen, Z.; Jun, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Kai, W.; Jia, M.; Zi, J. Hardness recognition of fruits and vegetables based on tactile array information of manipulator. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 181, 105959. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ambaw, A.; Fadiji, T.; Opara, L. Thermo-Mechanical Analysis in the Fresh Fruit Cold Chain: A Review on Recent Advances. Foods 2021, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jing, A.; Xiu, L.; Li, X.; Xiu, T.; Hai, L. Discrimination of Inner Injury of Korla Fragrant Pear Based on Multi-Electrical Parameters. Foods 2023, 12, 1805. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohammed, M.; Munir, M.; Aljabr, A. Prediction of Date Fruit Quality Attributes during Cold Storage Based on Their Electrical Properties Using Artificial Neural Networks Models. Foods 2022, 11, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dan, Z.; Xiao, R.; Li, W.; Xue, G.; Yong, G.; Jian, L. Collaborative analysis on difference of apple fruits flavour using electronic nose and electronic tongue. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 260, 108879. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jian, Q.; Guo, S.; Chang, L.; Yuan, Z.; Zhi, C.; Hai, Y.; Lian, W.; Rui, G. Study on the Application of Electronic Nose Technology in the Detection for the Artificial Ripening of Crab Apples. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 386. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ya, Z.; De, Z.; Han, L.; Xin, H.; Ji, D.; Rui, J.; Xiao, H.; Tahir, N.; Yu, L. Research hotspots and frontiers in agricultural multispectral technology: Bibliometrics and scientometrics analysis of the Web of Science. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 955340. [Google Scholar]
  21. Melo, M.; Almeida, C.; Cavalcante, M.; Ikeda, M.; Barbi, T.; Costa, B.P.; Ribani, H. Garcinia brasiliensis fruits and its by-products: Antioxidant activity, health effects and future food industry trends—A bibliometric review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, L.; Xiao, H.; Yu, L.; Xiao, D. Research advance on worldwide agriculture UAVs in 2001~2020 based on bibiometrics. Trans. CSAE 2021, 37, 328–339. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, X.; Lu, A.; De, W. Research progress of biochar in the world based on bibliometrics anlysis. Trans. CSAE 2020, 36, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ann, P.; Jeroen, L.; Kristien, O.; Bart, N. Prediction of the optimal picking date of different apple cultivars by means of VIS/NIR-spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2001, 21, 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  26. Qing, L.; Mao, W.; Wei, G. Computer vision based system for apple surface defect detection. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 36, 215–223. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bart, N.; Katrien, B.; Els, B.; Ann, P.; Wouter, S.; Karen, T.; Jeroen, L. Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 46, 99–118. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hai, C.; Ren, L.; Qi, Z.; Fernando, M. Nondestructive detection of chilling injury in cucumber fruit using hyperspectral imaging with feature selection and supervised classification. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2016, 111, 352–361. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ebrahiema, A.; Olaniyi, F.; Lembe, M.; Umezuruike, O. Non-destructive prediction of internal and external quality attributes of fruit with thick rind: A review. J. Food Eng. 2018, 217, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  30. Anuja, B.; Atul, B. Fruits and vegetables quality evaluation using computer vision: A review. J. King Saud. Univ.-Com. 2018, 33, 243–257. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bao, Z.; Wen, H.; Jiang, L.; Chun, Z.; Shu, F.; Ji, W.; Cheng, L. Principles, developments and applications of computer vision for external quality inspection of fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 326–343. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kasampalis, S.; Tsouvaltzis, P.; Ntouros, K.; Gertsis, A.; Gitas, I.; Siomos, S. The use of digital imaging, chlorophyll fluorescence and Vis/NIR spectroscopy in assessing the ripening stage and freshness status of bell pepper fruit. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, C.; Luo, L.; Li, J.; Lian, G.; Zou, X. Recognition and Localization Methods for Vision-Based Fruit Picking Robots: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shao, W.; Sotirios, G. Faster R-CNN for multi-class fruit detection using a robotic vision system. Comput. Netw. 2020, 168, 107036. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeffrey, F.; Michael, P.; Scott, S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 2002, 31, 899–933. [Google Scholar]
  36. Circular of the State Council on Printing and Issuing the ‘14th Five-Year Plan’ to Promote Agricultural and Rural Modernization Planning. Bull. State Counc. PRC 2022, 6, 6–29.
  37. Notice of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the Ministry of Finance on announcing the list of advantageous and characteristic industrial clusters in 2020. Bull. Minist. Agric. Rural Aff. PRC 2020, 6, 6–7.
  38. Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on printing and distributing the implementation plan of “three products and one standard” promotion action of ‘agricultural production’. Bull. Minist. Agric. Rural Aff. PRC 2021, 4, 86–90.
  39. Fan, Q.; Jia, L.; Chen, Z.; Guang, Z.; Dan, H.; Xiao, T.; De, Q.; Hao, T. Biochar in the 21st century: A data-driven visualization of collaboration, frontier identification, and future trend. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 818, 151774. [Google Scholar]
  40. Inkyu, S.; Zong, G.; Feras, D.; Ben, U.; Tristan, P.; Chris, M. DeepFruits: A Fruit Detection System Using Deep Neural Networks. Sensors 2016, 16, 1222. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu, T.; Guo, Y.; Zhe, W.; Hao, W.; En, L.; Zi, L. Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved YOLO-V3 model. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 157, 417–426. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sergio, C.; Nuria, A.; Enrique, M.; Juan, S.; Jose, B. Advances in Machine Vision Applications for Automatic Inspection and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2011, 4, 487–507. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hao, T.; Jia, L.; Min, H.; Jia, L.; Dan, Z.; Fan, Q.; Chen, Z. Global evolution of research on green energy and environmental technologies: A bibliometric study. J. Environ. Manage. 2021, 297, 113382. [Google Scholar]
  44. Michael, B. Nicht-destruktive Bestimmung der Fruchtfestigkeit und des Fruchtzuckers bei Apfel, Birne und Kiwi. Erwerbs-Obstbau 2013, 55, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  45. Francesca, A.; Federico, P.; Graziella, P.; Amedeo, P.; Salvatore, A.; Paolo, M. Non-destructive Estimation of Mandarin Maturity Status Through Portable VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 809–813. [Google Scholar]
  46. Camps, C.; Christen, D. Non-destructive assessment of apricot fruit quality by portable visible-near infrared spectroscopy. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Harker, F.; Rachel, A.; Gemma, E.; Gunson, F. Influence of Texture on Taste: Insights Gained During Studies of Hardness, Juiciness, and Sweetness of Apple Fruit. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, S77–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, B.; Abbott, J.; Lee, K.; Choi, C.; Choi, K. Near-infrared diffuse reflectance for quantitative and qualitative measurement of soluble solids and firmness of delicious and gala apples. Trans. ASAE 2003, 46, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manuela, Z.; Bernd, H.; Jean, R.; Veronique, B.; Sandra, L. Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life. J. Food Eng. 2005, 77, 254–260. [Google Scholar]
  50. Shela, G.; Olga, M.; Antonin, L.; Milan, C.; Robert, S.; Yong, S.; Abraham, C.; Imanual, L.; Simon, T. Comparative content of some phytochemicals in Spanish apples, peaches and pears. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 82, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar]
  51. Leemans, V.; Magein, H.; Destain, M. Defects segmentation on ‘Golden Delicious’ apples by using colour machine vision. Comput. Electron. Agric. 1998, 20, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Manuela, B.; Alphus, W. Electronic-Nose Applications for Fruit Identification, Ripeness and Quality Grading. Sensors 2015, 15, 899–931. [Google Scholar]
  53. Xiao, H.; Min, L.; Hui, L.; Liang, J.; Hai, T. Non-destructive qualification of kiwi-fruit by near infrared diffuse reflection spectrometry. Phys. Test. Chem. Anal. 2018, 54, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  54. Francisca, M.; Rosangela, C.; Camilo, M.; Fábio, M.; Tássia, F.; Roberta, H.; Kássio, L. Estimation of Ascorbic Acid in Intact Acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC) Fruit by NIRS and Chemometric Analysis. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 12. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sofu, M.; Er, O.; Kayacan, M.; Cetişli, B. Design of an automatic apple sorting system using machine vision. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 127, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Itakura, K.; Saito, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Kondo, N.; Hosoi, F. Estimation of Citrus Maturity with Fluorescence Spectroscopy Using Deep Learning. Horticulturae 2018, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guang, Q.; Hua, L.; Xu, W.; Chen, W.; Sai, X.; Xin, L.; Chang, F. Nondestructive Detecting Maturity of Pineapples Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Transmittance Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Methodologies. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 889. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ebrahimi, S.; Pourdarbani, R.; Sabzi, S.; Rohban, M.H.; Arribas, J.I. From Harvest to Market: Non-Destructive Bruise Detection in Kiwifruit Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Hyperspectral Imaging. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, J.; Liu, W. A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers. Scientometrics 2020, 123, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mokhnacheva, Y.V. Document Types Indexed in WoS and Scopus: Similarities, Differences, and Their Significance in the Analysis of Publication Activity. Sci. Tech. Inf. Process. 2023, 50, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kokol, P. Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: A follow-up study. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2023, 111, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horticulturae 09 01091 g001
Figure 1. Cumulative histogram of the annual change in the number of publications for the top 10 countries in the field of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality.
Figure 1. Cumulative histogram of the annual change in the number of publications for the top 10 countries in the field of non-destructive testing technology for fruit quality.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g001
Horticulturae 09 01091 g002
Figure 2. Mapping knowledge domains of co-authoring countries/regions.
Figure 2. Mapping knowledge domains of co-authoring countries/regions.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g002
Horticulturae 09 01091 g003
Figure 3. Knowledge domain mapping of hierarchical clustering trees based on keywords and bimodule matrix of journals.
Figure 3. Knowledge domain mapping of hierarchical clustering trees based on keywords and bimodule matrix of journals.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g003
Horticulturae 09 01091 g004
Figure 4. Clustering maps of keywords.
Figure 4. Clustering maps of keywords.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g004
Horticulturae 09 01091 g005
Figure 5. Evolution of emergency hotspots of keywords.
Figure 5. Evolution of emergency hotspots of keywords.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g005
Horticulturae 09 01091 g006
Figure 6. Temporal map of keywords.
Figure 6. Temporal map of keywords.
Horticulturae 09 01091 g006
Table 1. Top 10 institutions with a high number of publications in the Web of Science.
Table 1. Top 10 institutions with a high number of publications in the Web of Science.
High-Volume Institutions Top 10NumberRatio (%)
Zhejiang University715.07
United States Department of Agriculture634.50
China Agricultural University362.57
Ministry of Agriculture Rural Affairs362.57
Ku Leuven342.43
Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche322.29
Michigan State University271.93
Washington State University261.86
Northwest A&F University, China241.71
National Agriculture and Food Research
Organization, Japan		241.71
Table 2. Top 10 high-publication journals in the Web of Science.
Table 2. Top 10 high-publication journals in the Web of Science.
High-Published Journals Top 10NumberRatio (%)
Postharvest Biology and Technology856.07
Acta Horticulturae553.93
Horticulturae463.29
Journal of Food Engineering423.00
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture342.43
Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis322.29
Transactions of the Asae292.07
Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry		261.86
Food Chemistry231.64
Biosystems Engineering221.57
Table 3. Top 10 high-citation studies in the Web of Science.
Table 3. Top 10 high-citation studies in the Web of Science.
Top 10DocumentFrequency
1DeepFruits: A Fruit Detection System Using Deep Neural Networks482
2Apple Detection during Different Growth Stages in Orchards Using the Improved YOLO-V3 Model372
3Advances in Machine Vision Applications for Automatic Inspection and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables329
4NIR Spectroscopy Applications for Internal and External Quality Analysis of Citrus Fruit—A Review300
5Principles and Applications of Hyperspectral Imaging in Quality Evaluation of Agro-Food Products: A Review284
6Reflectance Spectral Features and Non-Destructive Estimation of Chlorophyll, Carotenoid and Anthocyanin Content in Apple Fruit264
7Measurement of the Optical Properties of Fruits and Vegetables Using Spatially Resolved Hyperspectral Diffuse Reflectance Imaging Technique257
8Non-destructive Measurement of Acidity, Soluble Solids, and Firmness of Jonagold Apples Using NIR-Spectroscopy243
9Principles, Developments and Applications of Computer Vision for External Quality Inspection of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review240
10A New Index Based on Vis Spectroscopy To Characterize the Progression of Ripening in Peach Fruit240
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ni, P.; Niu, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Lan, H. Bibliometrics and Visual Analysis of Non-Destructive Testing Technology for Fruit Quality. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101091

AMA Style

Ni P, Niu H, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liu Y, Lan H. Bibliometrics and Visual Analysis of Non-Destructive Testing Technology for Fruit Quality. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(10):1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ni, Peng, Hao Niu, Yurong Tang, Yabo Zhang, Wenyang Zhang, Yang Liu, and Haipeng Lan. 2023. "Bibliometrics and Visual Analysis of Non-Destructive Testing Technology for Fruit Quality" Horticulturae 9, no. 10: 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101091

APA Style

Ni, P., Niu, H., Tang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., & Lan, H. (2023). Bibliometrics and Visual Analysis of Non-Destructive Testing Technology for Fruit Quality. Horticulturae, 9(10), 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop