Next Article in Journal
Pigment-Related Mutations Greatly Affect Berry Metabolome in San Marzano Tomatoes
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of NaHSO3 on Cellular Metabolic Energy, Photosynthesis and Growth of Iris pseudacorus L.
Previous Article in Journal
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes Respond Differently to Long-Term Dry and Humid Heat Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Particulate Matter (PM) Adsorption and Leaf Characteristics of Ornamental Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Cultivars and Two Common Indoor Plants (Hedera helix L. and Epipremnum aureum Lindl. & Andre)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Morpho-Anatomical and Eco-Physiological Responses of Viburnum tinus L. var lucidum as Modulated by Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride Salinization

1
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
2
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(2), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020119
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022

Abstract

:
Salinity in water and soil is among the major constraints to the cultivation of ornamental crops since it can affect their growth and aesthetic value. A greenhouse experiment was carried out to assess whether the application of two different salts (80 mM NaCl or 53.3 mM CaCl2, with a final ionic concentration of 160 mM) could differently modulate the anatomical and physiological acclimation of an important ornamental species such as Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum. Eco-physiological analyses (e.g., leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence emission) were performed and leaves were subjected to light microscopy analysis to quantify functional anatomical traits through digital image analysis. Results showed that the two iso-osmotic solutions induced different structure-mediated physiological alterations in V. tinus plants. Photosynthesis was lowered by CaCl2 treatments (−58%) more than by NaCl (−37%), also due to the occurrence of photodamage apart from stomatal limitations. Neither Na+ nor Cl exhibited toxic effects in leaf lamina structure which was reflected in the limited reduction in dry matter accumulation. Overall data were interpreted focusing on the coordination among leaf structural and functional traits suggesting that the fine control of functional anatomical traits contributes to physiological acclimation to both stressful conditions.

1. Introduction

The genus Viburnum, belonging to the Adoxaceae family, comprises nearly 200 species widely used as ornamentals in urban landscapes. Among the most utilized species, Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum (Mill.) Aiton [1] is an ornamental shrub known for being tolerant to drought and salinity stress, attributes making it suitable for xeriscaping [2,3].
In the last decades, the Mediterranean area has suffered serious limitations to plant growth, development, and production due to climate change consequences, such as enhanced frequency, severity, and duration of drought periods, also triggering the rising of the salinity levels in soil and water. Understanding the mechanisms of plants’ responses to abiotic stresses due to climate changes in arid and semi-arid areas is increasing not only for food crops but also for ornamental species [4]. Furthermore, water scarcity and low water quality have recently induced municipalities to consider the use of reclaimed water or industrial wastewater (with high salt concentration) for landscape irrigation [5]. Salinity stress, due to the poor quality of irrigation water, can contribute to plants experiencing osmotic stress even under adequate levels of water availability in the soil. Furthermore, specific ionic effects due to unbalanced uptake and ionic toxicity can occur, causing in ornamental plants a visual quality depletion related to foliage damage and necrosis, growth and flowering reduction [6]. In this context, the study of the effect of salinity on ornamental species becomes crucial to evaluate the most tolerant plants that can be used for landscaping especially in arid and semi-arid regions [7].
Plants living in conditions of water scarcity or high salinity levels have developed a series of morphological traits to adapt their metabolism to the limiting environment [8]. These changes are often considered to be alterations to enhance the ability of the plant to resist the stress imposed by the high salinity levels; however, they can easily be mistaken to be signs of damage and disruption of the plants’ activity [9].
For example, one of the first reactions of plants subjected to saline stress is a conspicuous reduction in leaf area [4]. This is considered a mechanism to reduce the water loss by better regulating stomatal closure, and to enhance the efficiency of water use, in the same way it happens when plants are subjected to osmotic stress [10]. The limitation in transpiration, either due to the reduction in canopy in favor of root development or to physiological adjustment, is a means to favor the retention of toxic ions at the root level while reducing the translocation towards the aerial organs [10,11]. Generally, leaf area reductions when plants are subjected to different kind of stresses are also known to reduce “construction costs” and raise yields under global atmospheric changes [12,13].
The response to salinity and drought stress also involves anatomical changes of the leaf lamina. A salinity-induced increase in the leaf lamina thickness is often reported and ascribed to the increase in either palisade or spongy parenchyma thickness. In the first case, the response is considered a way to maximize the photosynthesis potential under the stressful saline condition due to the major content of chloroplasts in the palisade parenchyma [14,15]. Changes in spongy thickness instead are often accompanied by the increase in intercellular spaces, a phenomenon also happening under conditions of drought stress [14,16,17]. Indeed, the increase in intercellular spaces in the spongy parenchyma is interpreted as a way to facilitate CO2 diffusion through the leaves, especially in a situation of reduced stomatal aperture. On the other hand, a larger incidence of intercellular spaces would represent a strategy for water saving by reducing transpiration, indicating a larger resistance to water flow due to reduced connections between cells [18].
Other anatomical and cytological changes induced by salinity include, apart from salt glands, alterations in the number and size of stomata, number and size of chloroplasts, ultrastructure of chloroplasts, as well as frequency of trichomes, all features related to the control of photosynthesis and transpiration [19,20]. Experiments based on the application of iso-osmotic solutions of different salts allow distinguishing between osmotic stress and ion toxicity, also helping to unravel the different strategies adopted by plants when subjected to different salt types. De Micco et al. [21] recently found that C. citrinus plants subjected to CaCl2 solutions developed leaf morpho-anatomical traits (larger spongy cells, lowest percentage of phenolic compounds in leaves, reduced stomatal frequency) that did not allow plants to maintain a high photosynthetic performance compared to NaCl iso-osmotic solution, highlighting the key role of anatomical traits in maintaining the photosynthetic efficiency under stressful conditions.
Although salinity tolerance changes severely among plant species and cultivars, research-based information on Viburnum salt tolerance is still limited [6], especially when subjected to iso-osmotic salt solutions. Based on the above reasoning, here we grew Viburnum tinus var. lucidum plants using the same agricultural practices but subjecting them to an irrigation treatment performed by using two different iso-osmotic salt solutions (CaCl2_T, CaCl2 and NaCl_T, NaCl). We monitored growth, morpho-anatomical, and physiological traits of salt stressed plants comparing them to non-treated control plants, with a specific focus on the structure–function relations which dictate possible ion-specific acclimation strategies to salinity.
Since Viburnum is one of the most sold ornamental species in the European market as ornamental potted shrubs for the brilliant color of its foliage [22] and considering the climate change context we are experiencing in the Mediterranean area, the study of the effect of salinity on ornamental species becomes crucial to evaluate the most tolerant plants that can be used for landscaping, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [23].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Cultivation Conditions, and Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted in an unheated greenhouse at the Azienda Agraria Torre Lama, an experimental station of the University of Naples Federico II, Southern Italy (43° 31′ N, 14° 58′ E; 60 m a.s.l.). Two-years-old rooted cuttings of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum (provided by the specialized nursery Vivaio Torsanlorenzo, Ardea, Italy) were transplanted in 1.5 L pots filled with peat moss, placed at a density of 2.4 per square meter, and cultivated for 4 months. Daily temperature ranged between 17 and 34°C, while relative humidity was maintained at 58/75% (day/night). Average Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPFD) was 550 μmol m−2 s−1, thanks to a 50% black shading net, and was measured by a light sensor operating in the FluorPen FP100max fluorometer (Photon System Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic).
Plants (n. 72) were fertigated with three nutrient solutions, 15 days after the transplant (DAT) in a randomized complete-block design with four replicates, per treatment, to obtain 3 salinity conditions: a CaCl2 salinity treatment (CaCl2_T), a NaCl salinity treatment (NaCl_T), and a non-salt control (C). More specifically, the C plants were fertigated with a basic nutrient solution with an electrical conductivity (EC) of 2.0 dS m−1 and containing: 13.6 mM N-NO3, 2.0 mM S,1.4 mM 164 P, 6.0 mM K, 4.5 mM Ca, 2.0 mM Mg, 20 μM Fe, 9 μM Mn, 1.5 μM 165 Cu, 3 μM Zn, 20 μM B, and 0.3 μM Mo [24]. CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants contained the basic nutrient solution with the addition of 53.3 mM CaCl2 and 80 mM NaCl, respectively, leading to a total ion concentration of 160 mM in both saline solutions. The two salt solutions were characterized by iso-osmotic concentration, with EC values of 11.6 and 11.1 dS m−1 for the CaCl2_T and NaCl_T, respectively. The pH in the three nutrient solutions was 6.0 ± 0.2.

2.2. Biometry, Morphological, and Anatomical Leaf Traits

At the end of the salinity treatment (127 DAT), 10 plants per treatment were sampled to quantify canopy volume (CV), total leaf area (TLA) per plant height (PH), leaf dry weight (LDW) and stem dry weight (SDW) per plant, area of the single leaf (ASL), and specific leaf weight (SLW).
After the measurement of plant height, canopy volume was estimated by approximating the canopy to the volume of a sphere and the leaves were collected to measure leaf area by means of an electronic area meter (Li-Cor3000, Li- 182 Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). The dry biomass was determined by drying the above ground biomass (leaves and stems) in a forced-air oven at 75 °C until constant weight. SLW was measured in 5 leaves per treatment as the ratio between leaf dry mass and leaf area [25] on six fully expanded leaves.
At 127 DAT, 9 fully expanded leaves were collected from three plants per treatment and fixed in the FAA chemical solution (40% formaldehyde/glacial acetic acid/50% ethanol-5/5/90 by volume). The median portion of each leaf was dissected under a dissection microscope (SZX16, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) to obtain subsamples of 5 mm × 5 mm leaf lamina to be devoted to the preparation for thin sectioning, while the remaining part of the lamina was used to quantify epidermal traits (i.e., stomata and trichome features). For thin sectioning, the subsamples were dehydrated in an ethanol series up to 95%, infiltrated and embedded in the acrylic resin JB4® (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). The 5 µm thick cross sections of the leaf lamina were cut through a rotative microtome. Sections were stained with 0.5% Toluidine blue in water [26], mounted with mineral oil for microscopy, and observed under a transmitted light microscope (BX60, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). Unstained sections were mounted with mineral oil for fluorescence microscopy and observed under the epi-fluorescence microscope equipped with the settings to detect the autofluorescence of phenolic compounds (Mercury lamp, band-pass filter 330–385 nm, dichromatic mirror > 400 nm, and barrier filter > 420 nm) [27,28].
For the quantification of stomata and trichome traits on the abaxial epidermis, 3 portions of the leaf lamina per chemically fixed leaf were flattened on microscope slides and mounted with distilled water. The epidermis was observed under the epi-fluorescence microscope with the same settings reported above which allowed highlighting the inner thick wall of stomata guard cells and trichomes with suberized walls, thus easing their identification and counting.
Images of the leaf sections and of the lamina abaxial surface were taken with a digital camera (CAMEDIA C4040, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany), avoiding main veins. The digital images were analyzed with the image analysis software program AnalySIS® 3.2 (Olympus). On the leaf cross sections the following parameters were quantified: thickness of palisade and spongy parenchyma (in 5 transects of the lamina), area of single parenchyma cells (in 15 cells per section), density of spongy parenchyma (as percentage of area occupied by cells over a given surface, in 5 regions of the section), area occupied by phenolics in the spongy parenchyma (as percentage of spongy tissue occupied by the auto-fluorescent phenolic compounds over a given surface, in 5 regions of the section), as reported in De Micco et al. [29]. On the leaf abaxial epidermis, the following parameters were quantified: frequency of stomata and trichomes (number of objects per surface unit), stomatal size (e.g., area of the single stomata calculating by measuring length and width of stomata guard cells and approximating the stomata to an ellipse, in 15 stomata per leaf), and stomatal area (by multiplying the stomatal size by stomata frequency and expressing the value as percentage over the given surface).

2.3. Leaf Gas-Exchanges and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Emission

Eco-physiological behavior of plants was monitored by performing measurements of leaf gas exchanges and chlorophyll a fluorescence emission at 106 and 121 DAT. The measurements were performed within 2 h across solar noon, on fully expanded leaves using nine replicates per each treatment.
With a portable gas-exchange analyzer (LCA 4, ADC BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK), equipped with a broad-leaf chamber, the following parameters were measured: net CO2 assimilation rate (PN), sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gS), transpiration rate (E), and intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE).
On the same day and using a portable FluorPen FP100max fluorometer, equipped with a light sensor (Photon System Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic), the chlorophyll a fluorescence emission measurements were performed following Lichtenthaler and Babani [30]. The ground fluorescence (F0) was induced by an internal LED blue light (1–2 μmol photons m−2 s−1) on 30 min dark-adapted leaves. The maximal fluorescence in the dark (Fm) was induced by a saturating pulse of 3000 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/F0) was determined as the ratio of variable to ground fluorescence. For the fluorescence measurements in the light, the quantum yield of PSII electron transport (ΦPSII) was determined following Genty et al. (1989) [31], while the photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical quenching (qN) were calculated as reported in [32].

2.4. Mineral Composition and Organic Acids

The anions, cations, and organic acids were separated and quantified by ion chromatography (ICS-3000, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). More specifically, at 127 DAT, the leaf and root dried tissues were ground separately in a Wiley mill (IKA, MF10.1, Staufen, Germany) with a 0.5 mm sieve, and 1 g of leaf and root dry powder per plant was used for chemical analyses. For the analysis of ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Cl) and organic acids (quinic, acetic, formic, malic, tartaric, oxalic, and citric acids), 250 mg of leaf and root dried matter were extracted in 50 mL of ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using a shaking water bath (ShakeTemp SW22, Julabo, Seelbach, Germany) at 80 °C for 10 min following Rouphael et al. [20]. Nutrient accumulation was calculated by multiplying the dry weight of each plant part by the concentration of a given nutrient.

2.5. Data Elaboration

All experimental data were subjected to one-way ANOVA using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Eco-physiological data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA with the salt treatment and DAT used as independent factors, also showing their interactions. Multiple comparison tests were performed with the Student–Newman–Keuls coefficient using p < 0.05 as the level of probability. Percent data were transformed through arcsine function before statistical analysis. Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were performed to check for normality [21].

3. Results

3.1. Growth and Morpho-Anatomical Traits

Both salinity treatments significantly reduced all plant growth parameters whereas an opposite trend was recorded for the specific leaf weight (SLW) (Table 1). Canopy volume (CV), leaf and stem dry weight per plant (LDW, SDW) showed similar values in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants which were significantly lower than control (C) ones. As regards total leaf area per plant height (TLA/PH) and the area of single leaf (ASL), both parameters were significantly lower in NaCl_T than in CaCl2_T plants which in turn showed significantly lower values than the non-saline (C) treatment. Finally, specific leaf weight was similar in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants and significantly higher than the non-saline control treatment.
Microscopy analysis of V. tinus leaves showed that salinity treatments did not cause severe alteration of the tissues in the dorsi-ventral leaf lamina, since no tissue rupture or thickened cell walls were observed. A few episodes of slight plasmolysis in some spongy parenchyma cells were evidenced (Figure 1a–f,l–n). Palisade parenchyma was made of up to three layers of cells independently from the treatment; the spongy parenchyma seemed to be denser in the salinity treated plants compared to controls. This was confirmed by the quantification of density of spongy parenchyma which was 40 ± 1.4% (mean value ± standard error) and 39 ± 1.2% in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants, respectively, values significantly higher than the 34 ± 1.1% of the control. Both palisade and spongy parenchyma were rich in phenolics, which appeared yellow-fluorescent and localized along the cell membranes especially at the chloroplast level (Figure 1l–n). The quantification of anatomical traits allowed to determine that salinity significantly reduced both palisade and spongy parenchyma thickness (Table 2). In detail, palisade parenchyma was significantly lower in CaCl2_T than NaCl_T plants, which in turn showed significantly higher values than C plants. Spongy parenchyma instead was similar in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants but lower than control. The reduced spongy parenchyma thickness was likely due only to the salinity-induced lower incidence of intercellular spaces and lower number of cell layers given that the size of the single parenchyma cells was not significantly different in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T compared to C plants (Table 2). Stomatal size was significantly reduced in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants compared to control, with not significant differences among the two salinity treatments (Table 2). The reduced stomatal size in the salinity treated plants was accompanied by a significantly reduced percent stomatal area which showed minimum values in CaCl2_T plants also suggesting a reduced stomata frequency. The area (%) of the palisade and spongy parenchyma occupied by phenolics was significantly lower in NaCl_T and CaCl2_T leaves than controls (Table 2), notwithstanding the denser tissue.

3.2. Leaf Gas-Exchanges and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Emission

The measured gas-exchange parameters were not significantly influenced by the interaction between the two tested factors, namely salinity treatment (S) and the DAT (D). Net photosynthetic rate (PN) and stomatal conductance (gs) were significantly influenced only by S as main factors. In particular, PN showed values significantly lower in both of the salinity treated plants compared to C plants, with CaCl2_T even lower than NaCl_T, whereas only CaCl2_T plants showed gs values significantly lower than control (Table 3). Transpiration rate (E) was significantly influenced by both S and D as main factors; more specifically, E was, similarly to PN, significantly lower in both salt stressed plant treatments compared to C plants, and to in a greater extent in CaCl2_T plants, and at 106 DAT compared to the second date. The lower value of E at 106 DAT corresponded to the significantly higher intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) compared to the other date. iWUE was not significantly influenced by either of the salinity treatments (Table 3). Sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci) was not significantly influenced by S or D as main factors.
Regarding the chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis (Table 4), all analyzed parameters were significantly influenced by S as the main factor; while D as the main factor had a significant influence only on photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical quenching (qN). The interaction S × D was significant only in the case of qP. CaCl2_T plants showed significantly lower values of quantum yield of PSII electron transport (ФPSII) and maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/F0) compared to NaCl_T and C plants (Table 4). qP and qN were significantly lower in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants than control, with minimum values always after the addition of CaCl2 in the nutrient solution. With the prolongation of treatments with both salts, both qP and qN showed a significant increase.

3.3. Mineral and Organic Acids

Chemical analyses showed that both cation and ion contents were significantly influenced by the two salinity treatments (Table 5), while among organic acids only quinic and oxalic acids were significantly influenced.
As regards ions, NaCl_T plants showed a significantly increased content of Na+ in both leaves and roots compared to the other two treatments (CaCl2_T and C), while CaCl2_T plants showed a significantly increased content of Ca2+ in both leaves and roots compared to the other two treatments (NaCl_T and C) (Table 5).
K+ resulted reduced in NaCl_T and CaCl2_T leaves and roots compared to C, with the lowest values found in NaCl_T roots. Similarly, Mg2+ resulted reduced in NaCl_T and CaCl2_T leaves and roots compared to C, but with the lowest values found in NaCl_T leaves. Cl- in leaves was significantly increased only in CaCl2_T plants compared to both C and NaCl_T plants; in roots, Cl- content was significantly lower in C plants compared to NaCl_T which showed, in turn, significantly lower values than CaCl2_T ones.
Organic acids content in leaves was significantly influenced by the addition of NaCl and CaCl2 in the nutrient solution in the case of quinic, malic, and oxalic acids. Quinic acid content was significantly reduced in CaCl2_T plants compared to the control, while NaCl_Ts showed intermediate values. Malic acid content was reduced only in NaCl_T plants. The content of oxalic acid was significantly decreased and increased in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants, respectively, compared with the control (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The decrease in plant growth and eco-physiological parameters due to salinity stress is a well-known phenomenon reported in many crops including ornamental species [33,34,35,36]. Several species have shown different degrees of acclimation responses due to salinity stress; however, the coordination among morpho-functional traits to achieve the acclimation to osmotic or toxic stress has not been unraveled yet. This study shows how in Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum morpho-anatomical and eco-physiological parameters are coordinated to achieve different acclimation responses when plants are subjected to iso-osmotic solutions of NaCl and CaCl2.

4.1. The Effect of Salinity Treatment on Morpho-Anatomical Traits

When V. tinus var. lucidum plants were subject to NaCl and CaCl2 salinity (NaCl_T and CaCl2_T plants), they showed a similar reduction in their canopy volume and dry weight compared to controls. However, CaCl2_T plants presented a total leaf area (TLA) per plant height (PH) and the area of leaf lamina significantly higher than NaCl_T plants (but still lower than control), indicating that salinity influences the compactness of the habitus depending on the salt. On the contrary, the salt type did not influence the specific leaf weight, which was increased under salinity compared to controls, together with increased mesophyll density. Leaf area is an important plant growth trait to consider in physiological and agronomic studies since it influences light interception, photosynthetic efficiency, evapotranspiration, and the plant response to salts and irrigation. The more compact habitus of CaCl2_T plants compared to NaCl_Ts would indicate a lower light interception and a different microclimate within the canopy, which could explain the reduced photosynthesis and evapotranspiration in these plants. The morphological modifications found in V. tinus var. lucidum plants were different from recent findings in C. citrinus plants subjected to the same iso-osmotic solutions, where salinity did not induce any changes in leaf lamina expansion, but canopy reduction was more severe in plants treated with CaCl2 compared to NaCl [21]. Such different combinations of morphological traits indicate that, although there are some common morpho-anatomical responses linking salinity stress, the modality, and the intensity of them are strictly linked to the species, thus ultimately to the genotype [2,36]. Indeed, it is recognized that specific suites of structural features, and no single traits, determine the ability of a species to acclimate and cope with stressful conditions [37].
Here, V. tinus var. lucidum plants under salinity reduced growth and parameters such as leaf expansion, compared to control plants in agreement with main salinity-induced growth trends [38,39]. However, the higher leaf lamina expansion in CaCl2_T plants compared to NaCl_Ts, with the same dry biomass, can be interpreted in different ways. Firstly, it could be a way to compensate for the shading due to the more compact habitus to limit the reduction in photosynthetic performance. However, the lowest values of photosynthesis recorded in CaCl2_T plants indicate that this strategy was not efficient, also because CaCl2_T leaves were characterized by “less efficient” anatomical traits (e.g., reduced stomatal area and thickness of palisade parenchyma) than controls and NaCl_Ts. Such features are linked with reduced CO2 flow into the mesophyll and limited amount of tissue deputed to the utilization of incident light radiation for photosynthesis [40]. On the other hand, the reduction in leaf area expansion in NaCl_T plants might be a sign of a prompt adaptation to the stressful condition to reduce the “costs” linked to the formation of a greater leaf area and to allocate resources where they are most needed. Indeed, the reduction in leaf area and the specific leaf area (SLA) has often been related to increments in the water use efficiency of plants [41]. Here, no significant differences were detected between treatments concerning the efficiency of water use. However, an increasing trend was visible in both treated plants (CaCl2_T and NaCl_T). Finally, in several species of Viburnum, Chen et al. [42] found that the leaf Cl concentration increases with increased electrical conductivity of saline solution containing NaCl and CaCl2 (1.5:1) and that leaf chloride concentration correlates negatively with visual score, plant height, and leaf Pn and gs, but not with the leaf area.
Moreover, osmotic stress reduces the photosynthetic activity in plants, by inducing stomatal closure [43] until provoking plant senescence and death under severe conditions [44]. Therefore, increments in stomatal area, along with reduction in leaf area in NaCl_T plants, could be an added value to maintain good photosynthetic rates and a strategy to avoid plant senescence. In V. tinus var. lucidum plants treated with both salt solutions, the reduced stomatal size, a phenomenon often found as a response to stressful conditions, would indicate high ability to quickly control stomata opening/closure [45]. However, apart from stomata size, the regulation of stomata movements is strictly dependent on the availability of K+ ions to regulate the guard cell turgor pressure [46,47]. The strong reduction in K+ ion content in leaves of CaCl2_T and NaCl_T Viburnum plants, also accompanied by a similar decrease in Mg+ ions, could be another reason for the reduced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. In fact, low contents of K+ have been reported as responsible for reduced gs [48,49]. Once again, this is a different strategy if compared to C. citrinus plants subjected to NaCl salinity in which the translocation of K+ towards leaves likely compensated for the slow stomata reactivity due to their large size [21]. Vice versa, according to the same study on C. citrinus plants [21], the reduced growth in CaCl2_T plants, more than NaCl_Ts can be ascribed to less efficient leaf anatomical traits leading to less efficient gas-exchanges and photochemistry. It is noteworthy that even if both salinity treatments induced a decline in net-photosynthesis and stomatal conductance compared to control plants, the effects of CaCl2 on photosynthetic apparatus were stronger in inducing stress conditions.

4.2. The Effect of Salinity Treatment on Photosynthesis

The leaf gas exchange measurements indicated that, in both salt treatments (NaCl_T and CaCl2_T), the reduction in photosynthesis was due to stomatal closure, limiting the entrance of CO2 and water vapor within the mesophyll. This is supported by the parallel reduction in Pn, gs, and E despite no differences in sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci). The stomatal behavior under these circumstances may represent an advantage for saline-stressed plants because it is an efficient strategy against water loss, especially in the condition of chronic saline stress [50,51,52]. Indeed, iWUE under both saline treatments was similar to the control. However, while in the case of NaCl_T plants, only stomatal limitations seem to affect the gas exchanges, under CaCl2 saline stress the situation appears different because PSII photochemistry was also negatively affected, indicating the occurrence of non-stomatal limitations. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that reducing PSII photochemistry in CaCl2_T plants compared to control, together with Pn decline, could be a safety strategy engaged by photosynthetic apparatus to reduce the high excitation pressure at PSII reaction centers under limiting carbon fixation. This strategy would limit the occurrence of photodamage, as demonstrated for other abiotic stresses, such as drought and high temperatures [53,54]. However, in these plants, the drop in photochemical processes was accomplished by the rise in non-photochemical quenching (qN), indicating that the excess of absorbed light was dissipated as heat. This is a very common photoprotective response and highlights the importance of thermal dissipation mechanisms in maintaining the health status of photosynthetic apparatus in stressed plants [54]. In our case, the heat dissipation processes increase their importance in response to prolonged stress being more pronounced at the end of salt treatments.
Nevertheless, our data also demonstrated that such a compensatory mechanism is not adequate to avoid the photodamage in CaCl2_T treated plants because a significant drop in Fv/F0 was found compared to NaCl_T and control, suggesting the occurrence of stress to photosystems [21]. Neither CaCl2_T nor NaCl_T plants adopted the strategy to improve phenolics accumulation along cell membranes to dissipate the excess of light, thus avoiding photo-inhibitory processes [55,56]. It is likely that reduced photosynthesis did not allow the allocation of resources to implement this biochemical defense strategy as also found in other species subjected to salinity [20,57]. Conversely, NaCl_T plants exhibited a reduction in Pn and gs, but the photochemical efficiency remained unchanged compared to control. In this case, it is likely to suppose that at the basis of reduced photosynthesis, there were different adaptation mechanisms more linked to differences in leaf anatomical traits, such as the reduced number and accessibility of carboxylation sites due to reduced palisade parenchyma thickness and reduced volume for CO2 flow towards the mesophyll.
The progression of salt stress did not affect the net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance but increased leaf transpiration with negative implications on the intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). However, the latter was not influenced by salinity likely thanks to the contribution of the increased frequency of trichomes which would have limited leaf transpiration. In fact, among the many roles played by trichomes, it is recognized that dense trichome layers limit water losses in two ways. Firstly, they may increase the thickness of the boundary layer and consequently the resistance to water vapor diffusion from the leaf lamina surface, and secondly, they can reduce the temperature of the leaf surface [58].

4.3. The Effect of Salinity Treatment on Ion Accumulation

The use of low-quality irrigation water in agriculture results in salt accumulation in the root zone decreasing the osmotic potential and, as a consequence a decrease in the water available to the root zone [59,60]. Given the use of isosmotic solutions adopted in the present work, the osmotic effect induced in the plants has been the same [24]. Indeed, similar signs of slight loss of cell turgor have been evidenced in both CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants. Therefore, the differences observed between the growth of the plants irrigated with the two different saline solutions (CaCl2_T and NaCl_T) are likely due to the ionic effect rather than the osmotic one. Here, as expected, the uptake of Na+ was greater in both roots and leaves when plants were treated with NaCl, whereas uptake of Ca2+ was greater when the plants were treated with CaCl2. Furthermore, CaCl2 salinity had no effect on uptake of Na in the plant tissues, but NaCl salinity reduced Ca uptake in both leaves and roots. Specifically, NaCl resulted in lower plant growth than CaCl2, significantly in the average leaf size and the ratio between total leaf area and plant height. This phenomenon was expected, given the known deleterious effects of Na+ on uptake of cations and other nutrients [61]. The accumulation of Na+, Ca2+, and Cl increased appreciably in the corresponding salinity treatments in comparison with the control, indicating that Viburnum does not rely on ion exclusion to counteract salinity. As stated by Munns and Gilliham [62], the majority of plants from moderately to highly salt tolerant act as salt includers characterized by efficient salt compartmentalization into the cells. In our experiment, compartmentalization in the mesophyll cells was likely due to increased mesophyll density found in both salinity treatments.
Under saline sodic conditions, high levels of external Na+ not only interfere with K+ acquisition by the roots, but also may alter the selectivity of root for K+ over Na+. The K+ is a major inorganic nutrient cation in non-halophytes [63] and plays important roles in plant cell activities [64,65,66] and stress responses [67].
High Ca2+ concentrations are also known to inhibit stomatal regulation and lead to water stress in certain species, such as Aster tripolium L. [68], Gerbera jamesonii Adlam [69], and Vaccinium sect. cyanococcus [70]. This could explain the even more reduced Pn and gs in CaCl2_T plants than in NaCl_T plants. Furthermore, according to Bryla et al. [70] a stronger leaf injury incidence occurs in plants of blueberry irrigated with a saline solution of CaCl2 compared to NaCl treated and control plants. The observed toxic effect was attributed to the high concentration of Ca2+ rather than the chloride ions, by considering that calcifuge plants such as blueberry are highly efficient in Ca2+ uptake and cannot regulate Ca2+ influx, thus accumulating excessive amounts of this cation. A similar behavior might be related to low capacity for compartmentation or physiological inactivation of Ca2+ (e.g., precipitation as calcium oxalate). In our case, the observed significant reduction in the leaf concentration of oxalic acid in CaCl2_T and not in NaCl_T plants may well be explained by possible compartmentation by precipitation of calcium oxalate in the first. As previously reviewed by Franceschi and Horner [71], oxalic acid plays a key role in the ion balance, mainly calcium, in plants. Besides sodium, Ca2+ is also competitive with Mg2+ and the binding sites on the root plasma membrane appear to have less affinity for the highly hydrated Mg2+ than for Ca2+. Thus, high concentrations of substrate Ca2+ often result in increased leaf-Ca along with a marked reduction in leaf-Mg [72].
Cl is a plant micronutrient and regulates leaf osmotic potential, and turgor, and stimulates growth in plants [73,74]. Both the salts increased Cl uptake at root level, particularly when CaCl2 was applied, compared to control. Since the total leaf dry biomass was similar in CaCl2_T and NaCl_T plants, the observed highly increased accumulation at leaf level in CaCl2_T plants is due to the higher concentrations of chloride in the CaCl2 irrigation water. As reviewed by Wu and Li [75], the main traits related to controlling Cl transport, its role in plant salt tolerance, and how root and shoot regulate Cl exclusion may differ among species.

5. Conclusions

Results showed that plants of V. tinus var. lucidum reacted to salinity stress due to isosmotic solutions of NaCl and CaCl2 with the adoption of different strategies of acclimation involving both structural and physiological defenses. We suggest that CaCl2_T plants developed a less efficient leaf anatomical structure that contributed to the overall reduction in the plant photosynthetic performance. The occurrence of photodamage to photosystems in CaCl2_T plants was also detected as well as a stronger nutritional unbalance and toxic effect compared to NaCl_T plants. In conclusion, this study highlighted that the toxic effect due to specific salts can provoke damage and lower the yield and ornamental value of horticulture crops more than osmotic disfunction. Therefore, understanding the possible strategies adopted by plants by coordination structural and physiological acclimation to salinity induced by different salts is becoming more and more important for urban landscaping and restoration purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C., V.D.M. and Y.R.; methodology, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena) and Y.R.; formal analysis, C.C., V.D.M. and C.A. (Carmen Arena); investigation, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena) and Y.R.; resources, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena), S.D.P. and Y.R.; data curation, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena) and C.A. (Chiara Amitrano); writing—original draft preparation, V.D.M., C.A. (Chiara Amitrano); writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, all authors; supervision, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena) and Y.R.; project administration, C.C., C.A. (Carmen Arena) and S.D.P.; funding acquisition, C.C., V.D.M., C.A. (Carmen Arena), S.D.P. and Y.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors C.A. (Carmen Arena) and C.C.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mirella Sorrentino for technical support in the laboratory. We also wish to thank Giovanna Aronne for sharing the laboratory instruments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ipni. The International Plant Names Index; The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries and Australian National Botanic Gardens, 2021; Available online: http://www.ipni.org (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  2. Tribulato, A.; Toscano, S.; Di Lorenzo, V.; Romano, D. Effects of water stress on gas exchange, water relations and leaf structure in two ornamental shrubs in the Mediterranean area. Agronomy 2019, 9, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cassaniti, C.; Leonardi, C.; Flowers, T.J. The effects of sodium chloride on ornamental shrubs. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Toscano, S.; Ferrante, A.; Romano, D.; Tribulato, A. Interactive Effects of Drought and Saline Aerosol Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Two Ornamental Shrub Species. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yeager, T.H.; von Merveldt, J.K.; Larsen, C.A. Ornamental plant response to percentage of reclaimed water irrigation. HortScience 2010, 45, 1610–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sun, Y.; Chen, J.J.; Xing, H.; Paudel, A.; Niu, G.; Chappell, M. Growth, visual quality, and morphological responses of 12 Viburnum taxa to saline water irrigation. HortScience 2020, 55, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Giordano, M.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Cirillo, C.; Rouphael, Y. Biochemical, physiological, and molecular aspects of ornamental plants adaptation to deficit irrigation. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Micco, V.; Aronne, G. Morpho-anatomical Traits for Plant Adaptation to Drought. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 37–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tester, M.; Davenport, R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C.; Domingo, R.; Torrecillas, A.; Pérez-Pastor, A. Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plants. Plant Sci. 2000, 156, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Colmer, T.; Munns, R.; Flowers, T. Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: Future prospects. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 1425–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Srinivasan, V.; Kumar, P.; Long, S.P. Decreasing, not increasing, leaf area will raise crop yields under global atmospheric change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 1626–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Amitrano, C.; Arena, C.; Cirillo, V.; De Pascale, S.; De Micco, V. Leaf morpho-anatomical traits in Vigna radiata L. affect plant photosynthetic acclimation to changing vapor pressure deficit. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 186, 104453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Acosta-Motos, J.-R.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Álvarez, S.; Fernández-García, N.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernández, J.A. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of the ornamental Eugenia myrtifolia L. plants for coping with NaCl stress and recovery. Planta 2015, 242, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gómez-Bellot, M.J.; Nortes, P.A.; Ortuño, M.F.; Romero, C.; Fernandez-Garcia, N.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and treated wastewater on water relations and leaf structure alterations of Viburnum tinus L. plants during both saline and recovery periods. J. Plant Phyisiol. 2015, 188, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fraser, L.H.; Greenall, A.; Carlyle, C.; Turkington, R.; Friedman, C.R. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of Pseudoroegneria spicata: Response of stomatal density, leaf area and biomass to changes in water supply and increased temperature. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Álvarez, S.; Fernández-García, N.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernández, J.A. NaCl-induced physiological and biochemical adaptative mechanisms in the ornamental Myrtus communis L. plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 183, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Amitrano, C.; Arena, C.; Rouphael, Y.; De Pascale, S.; De Micco, V. Vapour pressure deficit: The hidden driver behind plant morphofunctional traits in controlled environments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 175, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rouphael, Y.; De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Raimondi, G.; Colla, G.; De Pascale, S. Effect of Ecklonia maxima seaweed extract on yield, mineral composition, gas exchange, and leaf anatomy of zucchini squash grown under saline conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Amitrano, C.; Rouphael, Y.; De Pascale, S.; Cirillo, C. Effects of NaCl and CaCl2 Salinization on Morpho-anatomical and Physiological Traits of Potted Callistemon citrinus Plants. Forests 2021, 12, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gori, R.; Lubello, C.; Ferrini, F.; Nicese, F.; Coppini, E. Reuse of industrial wastewater for the irrigation of ornamental plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. García-Caparrós, P.; Lao, M.T. The effects of salt stress on ornamental plants and integrative cultivation practices. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 240, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cirillo, C.; De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Carillo, P.; Pannico, A.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Biochemical, Physiological and Anatomical Mechanisms of Adaptation of Callistemon citrinus and Viburnum lucidum to NaCl and CaCl2 Salinization. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arena, C.; Conti, S.; Francesca, S.; Melchionna, G.; Hájek, J.; Barták, M.; Barone, A.; Rigano, M.M. Eco-physiological screening of different tomato genotypes in response to high temperatures: A combined field-to-laboratory approach. Plants 2020, 9, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Feder, N.; O’brien, T. Plant microtechnique: Some principles and new methods. Am. J. Bot. 1968, 55, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukazawa, K. Ultraviolet microscopy. In Methods in Lignin Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 110–121. [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Buggenhout, S.; Grauwet, T.; Van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. Structure/processing relation of vacuum infused strawberry tissue frozen under different conditions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 226, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Aronne, G. Anatomical alterations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. mature leaves irradiated with X-rays. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Babani, F. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 713–736. [Google Scholar]
  31. Genty, B.; Briantais, J.-M.; Baker, N.R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. BBA-Gen. Subj. 1989, 990, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bilger, W.; Björkman, O. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth. Res. 1990, 25, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ashraf, M.A.; Akbar, A.; Parveen, A.; Rasheed, R.; Hussain, I.; Iqbal, M. Phenological application of selenium differentially improves growth, oxidative defense and ion homeostasis in maize under salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seleiman, M.F.; Aslam, M.T.; Alhammad, B.A.; Hassan, M.U.; Maqbool, R.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Gitari, H.I.; Uslu, O.S.; Roy, R. Salinity stress in wheat: Effects, mechanisms and management strategies. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jafari, S.; Garmdareh, S.E.H. Effects of salinity on morpho-physiological, and biochemical characteristics of stock plant (Matthiola incana L.). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cirillo, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Caputo, R.; Raimondi, G.; Sifola, M.; De Pascale, S. Effects of high salinity and the exogenous application of an osmolyte on growth, photosynthesis, and mineral composition in two ornamental shrubs. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kummerow, J. Structural aspects of shrubs in Mediterranean-type plant communities. In Proceedings of the Jornadas Sobre las Bases Ecol¢ Gicas para la Gesti¢ n en Ecosistemas Terrestres, Zaragoza, Spain, 13–15 June 1988. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bozkurt, S.; Keskin, M. Effect of deficit irrigation on the estimation of cucumber leaf area under greenhouse conditions. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 877–882. [Google Scholar]
  39. Blanco, F.F.; Folegatti, M.V. Estimation of leaf area for greenhouse cucumber by linear measurements under salinity and grafting. Sci. Agric. 2005, 62, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Asmar, S.; Castro, E.; Pasqual, M.; Pereira, F.; Soares, J. Changes in leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of micropropagated banana plantlets under different silicon sources. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 161, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cirillo, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Caputo, R.; Raimondi, G.; De Pascale, S. The influence of deficit irrigation on growth, ornamental quality, and water use efficiency of three potted Bougainvillea genotypes grown in two shapes. HortScience 2014, 49, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, J.J.; Xing, H.; Paudel, A.; Sun, Y.; Niu, G.; Chappell, M. Gas Exchange and Mineral Nutrition of 12 Viburnum Taxa irrigated with Saline Water. HortScience 2020, 55, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anjum, S.A.; Xie, X.-Y.; Wang, L.-C.; Saleem, M.F.; Man, C.; Lei, W. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar]
  44. Campbell, D.R.; Wu, C.A.; Travers, S.E. Photosynthetic and growth responses of reciprocal hybrids to variation in water and nitrogen availability. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Raven, J.A. Speedy small stomata? J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Roelfsema, M.R.G.; Hedrich, R. Studying guard cells in the intact plant: Modulation of stomatal movement by apoplastic factors. New Phytol. 2002, 153, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tränkner, M.; Tavakol, E.; Jákli, B. Functioning of potassium and magnesium in photosynthesis, photosynthate translocation and photoprotection. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 163, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Ben-Gal, A.; Dag, A.; Shapira, O.; Schwartz, A. Modification of non-stomatal limitation and photoprotection due to K and Na nutrition of olive trees. Physiol. Plant Physiol. 2015, 177, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jákli, B.; Tavakol, E.; Tränkner, M.; Senbayram, M.; Dittert, K. Quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in K deficient sunflower and their implication on water-use efficiency. Physiol. Plant. Physiol. 2017, 209, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Moriana, A.; Pérez-López, D.; Prieto, M.; Ramírez-Santa-Pau, M.; Pérez-Rodriguez, J. Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 112, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amitrano, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Pannico, A.; De Pascale, S.; De Micco, V. Reducing the Evaporative Demand Improves Photosynthesis and Water Use Efficiency of Indoor Cultivated Lettuce. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Micco, V.; Amitrano, C.; Stinca, A.; Izzo, L.G.; Zalloni, E.; Balzano, A.; Barile, R.; Conti, P.; Arena, C. Dust accumulation due to anthropogenic impact induces anatomical and photochemical changes in leaves of Centranthus ruber growing on the slope of the Vesuvius volcano. Plant Biol. 2019, 22 (Suppl. 1), 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Arena, C.; Vitale, L.; De Santo, A.V. Paraheliotropism in Robinia pseudoacacia L.: An efficient strategy to optimise photosynthetic performance under natural environmental conditions. Plant Biol. 2008, 10, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vitale, L.; Arena, C.; De Santo, A.V. Seasonal changes in photosynthetic activity and photochemical efficiency of the Mediterranean shrub Phillyrea angustifolia L. Plant Biosyst. 2012, 146, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lattanzio, V.; Kroon, P.A.; Quideau, S.; Treutter, D. Plant phenolics—secondary metabolites with diverse functions. Recent Adv. Polyphen. Res. 2008, 1, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  56. De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Vitale, L.; Aronne, G.; Virzo De Santo, A. Anatomy and photochemical behaviour of Mediterranean Cistus incanus winter leaves under Natural outdoor and warmer indoor conditions. Botany 2011, 89, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Arena, C.; Vitale, L.; Virzo De Santo, A. Photosynthesis and photoprotective strategies in Laurus nobilis L. and Quercus ilex L. under summer drought and winter cold. Plant Biosyst. 2008, 142, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Karabourniotis, G.; Liakopoulos, G.; Nikolopoulos, D.; Bresta, P. Protective and defensive roles of non-glandular trichomes against multiple stresses: Structure–function coordination. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Franco, J.; Bañón, S.; Vicente, M.; Miralles, J.; Martínez-Sánchez, J. Root development in horticultural plants grown under abiotic stress conditions–a review. J. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 86, 543–556. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sánchez-Blanco, M.J.; Alvarez, S.; Ortuno, M.F.; Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C. Root system response to drought and salinity: Root distribution and water transport. Root Eng. 2014, 40, 325–352. [Google Scholar]
  61. Grattan, S.; Grieve, C. Salinity–mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 1998, 78, 127–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Munns, R.; Gilliham, M. Salinity tolerance of crops–what is the cost? New phytol. 2015, 208, 668–673. [Google Scholar]
  63. Dreyer, I.; Uozumi, N. Potassium channels in plant cells. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 4293–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Anschütz, U.; Becker, D.; Shabala, S. Going beyond nutrition: Regulation of potassium homoeostasis as a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. Physiol. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 670–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shabala, S.; Pottosin, I. Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: Implication for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2014, 151, 257–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, H.; Zhang, X.; Giraldo, J.P.; Shabala, S. It is not all about sodium: Revealing tissue specificity and signalling roles of potassium in plant responses to salt stress. Plant Soil 2018, 431, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Perera, L.; Robinson, M.; Mansfield, T. Responses of the stomata of Aster tripolium to calcium and sodium ions in relation to salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 1995, 46, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Albino-Garduño, R.; Zavaleta-Mancera, H.; Ruiz-Posadas, L.; Sandoval-Villa, M.; Castillo-Morales, A. Response of gerbera to calcium in hydroponics. J. Plant Nutr. 2007, 31, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bryla, D.R.; Scagel, C.F.; Lukas, S.B.; Sullivan, D.M. Ion-specific Limitations of Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride on Growth, Nutrient Uptake, and Mycorrhizal Colonization in Northern and Southern Highbush Blueberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2021, 146, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Franceschi, V.R.; Horner, H.T. Calcium oxalate crystals in plants. Bot. Rev 1980, 46, 361–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Marschner, H. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Elsevier/Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 684. [Google Scholar]
  73. Franco-Navarro, J.D.; Brumós, J.; Rosales, M.A.; Cubero-Font, P.; Talón, M.; Colmenero-Flores, J.M. Chloride regulates leaf cell size and water relations in tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 873–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Franco-Navarro, J.D.; Rosales, M.A.; Cubero-Font, P.; Calvo, P.; Álvarez, R.; Diaz-Espejo, A.; Colmenero-Flores, J.M. Chloride as a macronutrient increases water-use efficiency by anatomically driven reduced stomatal conductance and increased mesophyll diffusion to CO2. Plant J. 2019, 99, 815–831. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wu, H.; Li, Z. The importance of Cl− exclusion and vacuolar Cl sequestration: Revisiting the role of Cl transport in plant salt tolerance. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Light (af) and epi-fluorescence (gi,ln) microscopy views of leaf lamina cross sections (af,ln) and epidermal peels (gi) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum leaves of not-salt control (C) (a,d,g,l), CaCl2 salinity treatment (CaCl2_T) (b,e,h,m), and NaCl salinity treatment (NaCl_T) (c,f,i,n). Arrows in e and f point to cells undergoing plasmolysis. Images in (ai,ln) are at the same magnification; scale bars = 100 μm in (a) and (l), 50 μm in (d) and (g).
Figure 1. Light (af) and epi-fluorescence (gi,ln) microscopy views of leaf lamina cross sections (af,ln) and epidermal peels (gi) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum leaves of not-salt control (C) (a,d,g,l), CaCl2 salinity treatment (CaCl2_T) (b,e,h,m), and NaCl salinity treatment (NaCl_T) (c,f,i,n). Arrows in e and f point to cells undergoing plasmolysis. Images in (ai,ln) are at the same magnification; scale bars = 100 μm in (a) and (l), 50 μm in (d) and (g).
Horticulturae 08 00119 g001
Table 1. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution on canopy volume (CV), total leaf area (TLA) per plant height (PH), leaf dry weight (LDW), and stem dry weight (SDW) per plant, area of the single leaf (ASL), and specific leaf weight (SLW) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution on canopy volume (CV), total leaf area (TLA) per plant height (PH), leaf dry weight (LDW), and stem dry weight (SDW) per plant, area of the single leaf (ASL), and specific leaf weight (SLW) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
CV
(m3 Plant−1)
TLA/PH
(m2 m−1)
LDW
(g Plant−1)
SDW
(g Plant−1)
ASL
(cm2)
SLW
(g DW cm−2)
Salt treatment
  C1.61 ± 0.09 a2.41 ± 0.08 a133.18 ± 6.18 a80.93 ± 3.12 a28.22 ± 0.87 a81.83 ± 1.51 b
  CaCl2_T1.02 ± 0.15 b1.88 ± 0.10 b92.50 ± 6.03 b69.64 ± 3.16 b25.10 ± 0.81 b98.73 ± 1.53 a
  NaCl_T0.93 ± 0.06 b1.54 ± 0.08 c81.06 ± 4.32 b64.85 ± 2.98 b21.45 ± 1.00 c101.03 ± 2.07 a
Significance*****************
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table 2. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution on leaf anatomical functional traits (PP, palisade parenchyma; SP, spongy parenchyma) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution on leaf anatomical functional traits (PP, palisade parenchyma; SP, spongy parenchyma) of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
PP
Thickness
(μm)
SP Thickness
(μm)
Cell Area
(μm2)
Stomatal Size
(μm2)
Stomatal Area
(%)
Trichome Frequency
(n mm−1)
Phenolics
in PP
(%)
Phenolics
in PS
(%)
Salt treatment
  C85.9 ± 3.50 a176 ± 3.79 a188 ± 6.80463 ± 7.35 a4.33 ± 0.08 a3.04 ± 0.39 b57.9 ± 1.33 a13.0 ± 1.13 a
  CaCl2_T74.3 ± 1.87 c142 ± 3.92 b209 ± 9.40333 ± 6.97 b3.13 ± 0.06 c6.90 ± 0.63 a47.6 ± 2.66 b9.95 ± 1.24 b
  NaCl_T81.2 ± 2.87 b143 ± 4.53 b197 ± 7.21339 ± 5.65 b3.36 ± 0.06 b5.73 ± 0.53 a48.0 ± 22.7 b10.1 ± 1.25 b
Significance****NS************
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table 3. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution net photosynthetic rate (Pn), sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs) transpiration rate (E), of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effects of salt treatment in the nutrient solution net photosynthetic rate (Pn), sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs) transpiration rate (E), of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Pn
(µmol CO2 m−2 s−1)
Ci
(µmol mol−1)
gs
(mmol m−2 s−1)
E
(mol H2O m−2 s−1)
iWUE
(µmol CO2 mol−1 H2O)
Salt treatment
  C7.50 ± 0.34 a191.28 ± 11.69 a97.55 ± 14.20 a2.11 ± 0.13 a86.22 ± 12.19 a
  CaCl2_T3.15 ± 0.35 c171.70 ± 11.97 a31.64 ± 14.54 b0.93 ± 0.13 c122.57 ± 12.48 a
  NaCl_T4.73 ± 0.37 b172.29 ± 12.67 a64.61 ± 15.39 ab1.36 ± 0.14 b113.28 ± 13.21 a
DAT
  1065.12 ± 0.32 a173.33 ± 10.92 a58.34 ± 13.27 a1.22 ± 0.12 b123.47 ± 11.39 a
  1215.13 ± 0.25 a183.52 ± 8.74 a70.86 ± 10.62 a1.71 ± 0.10 a91.25 ± 9.11 b
Significance
  S***NS*****NS
  DNSNSNS***
  S × DNSNSNSNSNS
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table 4. Effects of salt treatment on quantum yield of PSII electron transport (ФPSII), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (qN), and potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/F0), of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effects of salt treatment on quantum yield of PSII electron transport (ФPSII), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (qN), and potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/F0), of Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
ФPSIIqPqNFv/Fo
Salt treatment
  C0.641 ± 0.009 a0.923 ± 0.009 a0.509 ± 0.021 b1.842 ± 0.071 a
  CaCl2_T0.540 ± 0.018 b0.874 ± 0.014 c0.597 ± 0.038 a1.221 ± 0.123 b
  NaCl_T0.615 ± 0.014 a0.905 ± 0.012 b0.565 ± 0.042 a1.686 ± 0.140 a
DAT
  1060.593 ± 0.019 a0.873 ± 0.014 b0.499 ± 0.032 b1.667 ± 0.143 a
  1210.604 ± 0.019 a0.928 ± 0.015 a0.615 ± 0.035 a1.499 ± 0.154 a
Significance
  S***********
  DNS******NS
  S × DNS*NSNS
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table 5. Effects of salt treatment in the solution on leaf and root mineral accumulation of main ionic species in Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effects of salt treatment in the solution on leaf and root mineral accumulation of main ionic species in Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Na+
(mg Plant−1)
K+
(mg Plant−1)
Ca2+
(mg Plant−1)
Mg2+
(mg Plant−1)
Cl
(mg Plant−1)
LeafRootLeafRootLeafRootLeafRootLeafRoot
Salt treatment
  C40.8 ± 5.02 b209 ± 23.0 b3744 ± 218.8 a1216 ± 136.5 a244 ± 34.3 b136 ± 12.3 b191 ± 13.9 a167 ± 22.6 a393 ± 25.1 b236 ± 33.4 c
  CaCl2_T53.3 ± 11.2 b137 ± 15.7 b1837 ± 162.5 b788 ± 73.9 b679 ± 95.5 a227 ± 24.8 a150 ± 16.1 b123 ± 7.17 ab1209 ± 127 a832 ± 96.9 a
  NaCl_T335 ± 54.5 a716 ± 42.7 a1607 ± 243.9 b418 ± 28.7 c73.6 ± 13.12 b72.4 ± 10.2 c75.8 ± 8.77 c98.3 ± 11.2 b588 ± 106 b593 ± 32.8 b
Significance****************************
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table 6. Effects of salt treatment in the solution on main organic acids (quinic, acetic, formic, malic, oxalic, fumaric, citric, and isocitric acids) leaf content in Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Effects of salt treatment in the solution on main organic acids (quinic, acetic, formic, malic, oxalic, fumaric, citric, and isocitric acids) leaf content in Viburnum tinus L. var. lucidum plants. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Different letters correspond to significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Quinic ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Acetic ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Formic ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Malic ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Oxalic ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Fumaric ac.
(g kg−1 DW.)
Citric ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Isocitric ac.
(g kg−1 DW)
Salt treatment
  C27.0 ± 2.28 a3.04 ± 0.180.38 ± 0.0325.8 ± 2.5 a3.30 ± 0.39 b1.36 ± 0.108.10 ± 1.480.21 ± 0.04
  CaCl2_T13.3 ± 2.29 b2.39 ± 0.280.38 ± 0.0326.3 ± 3.5 a1.54 ± 0.19 c1.27 ± 0.149.43 ± 1.640.27 ± 0.03
  NaCl_T19.6 ± 2.89 ab3.01 ± 0.420.36 ± 0.0814.0 ± 2.3 b5.66 ± 0.84 a1.30 ± 0.218.56 ± 1.430.28 ± 0.03
Significance**NSNS****NSNSNS
NS, *; **, ***, not significant or significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Amitrano, C.; Rouphael, Y.; De Pascale, S.; Cirillo, C. Changes in Morpho-Anatomical and Eco-Physiological Responses of Viburnum tinus L. var lucidum as Modulated by Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride Salinization. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020119

AMA Style

De Micco V, Arena C, Amitrano C, Rouphael Y, De Pascale S, Cirillo C. Changes in Morpho-Anatomical and Eco-Physiological Responses of Viburnum tinus L. var lucidum as Modulated by Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride Salinization. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(2):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020119

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Micco, Veronica, Carmen Arena, Chiara Amitrano, Youssef Rouphael, Stefania De Pascale, and Chiara Cirillo. 2022. "Changes in Morpho-Anatomical and Eco-Physiological Responses of Viburnum tinus L. var lucidum as Modulated by Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride Salinization" Horticulturae 8, no. 2: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020119

APA Style

De Micco, V., Arena, C., Amitrano, C., Rouphael, Y., De Pascale, S., & Cirillo, C. (2022). Changes in Morpho-Anatomical and Eco-Physiological Responses of Viburnum tinus L. var lucidum as Modulated by Sodium Chloride and Calcium Chloride Salinization. Horticulturae, 8(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop