Next Article in Journal
Root Physiological Changes and Transcription Analysis of Iris domestica in Response to Persistent Drought
Next Article in Special Issue
The Breeding of High-Quality Dandelions by NaCl Induced Callus Variation Combined with a Drosophila Tumor Cell Migration Test
Previous Article in Journal
Agrivoltaic System and Modelling Simulation: A Case Study of Soybean (Glycine max L.) in Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on Genome Size and Phytochemical Profile of Three Potential Species of Acacia: Threatened and Endemic to Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of 15 Varieties of Herbaceous Peony Pollen Submicroscopic Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships

College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Daizong Street #61, Tai’an 271018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(12), 1161; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121161
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morphology, Palynology and Phytochemicals of Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
Paeonia lactiflora Pall. is widely used in medicine, garden applications, and as a potted ornamental. Cultivated varieties of paeonifloras suitable for cut flowers are urgently needed. In this study, the pollen morphology of P. lactiflora was studied and the characters of different varieties were compared, so as to provide reference for selecting suitable parents for new hybrid varieties. We examined the pollen morphology of 15 herbaceous peony varieties using scanning electron microscopy and analyzed the external pollen morphology and genetic relationship of the varieties. The pollen grains of the studied varieties were spheroidal or subspheroidal, bilaterally symmetrical monads, circular in polar view, and circular or elliptical in equatorial view. The exine of the pollen grains was observed as being relatively smooth under the light microscope, with the area around the equatorial axis having more lumina under the scanning electron microscope. The pollen grain exine sculpture was either reticular or pit type. The pollen apertures were tricolporate, arranged longitudinally, and equally spaced. The pollen grains were of two sizes: medium and small. The differences between the varieties were mainly reflected in the exine sculpture of the pollen. The closer the genetic relationship between the 15 peony varieties, the more subtle the differences in the exine sculpture. In the same cluster group, the morphological characteristics of herbaceous peony pollen were correlated with the shapes of flower and scale buds and the texture of the petals. However, the study identified no direct correlation with the cultivar type and flower color.

1. Introduction

Pollen carries a large amount of genetic information, and the structure of pollen grains is determined by species genes. Individual pollen grains are not easily affected by the environment and have relatively stable characteristics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Understanding the morphological characteristics of pollen is important for discussing the origin, evolution, classification, and kinship of seed plants [7,8]. Some researchers have used a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to observe the pollen morphological characteristics of ornamental plants and explain the relationship between their species or varieties [9,10]. Studies on the pollen morphology of Paeonia lactiflora or Paeonia species have also been reported [11,12].
Paeonia lactiflora Pall. is a species of herbaceous flowering plant in the family Paeoniaceae. It is widely used in medicine, garden applications, and as a potted ornamental. However, some characters (such as flower type, color, size, pedicel length, and upright stem) of the existing varieties are not in line with the application standards of fresh cut flowers, which restricts the production and sale of such flowers. Breeding suitable peony varieties is important for the production of fresh cut flowers. In this study, 15 varieties of peony were selected for submicroscopic morphology analysis. We used SEM to observe morphological characteristics of pollen from these 15 varieties. We then analyzed the relationship between the tested varieties based on the external morphological characteristics of the plant and exine sculpture of the pollen. The aim of the study was to provide a reference for the selection of parents of new cut flower varieties in hybrid breeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Materials and Sampling

The test was conducted at the Horticulture Experimental Station of Shandong Agricultural University, the Experimental Center of the College of Horticulture Science and Engineering of Shandong Agricultural University, and the College of Life Science of Shandong Agricultural University. The test materials comprised 15 varieties of herbaceous peony. The sampled peony varieties are shown in Figure 1 and detailed in Table 1. During late April to early May 2020, plant material was collected between 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. on clear days. Complete anthers with mature, but not cracked, powder were collected with tweezers and placed into a penicillin bottle filled with glutaraldehyde fixing solution. Five milliliters of the solution was then slowly drawn using a 10 mL syringe, and then pumped back in slowly. This process was repeated two or three times to ensure full contact between the solution and the anthers, and the anthers were then allowed to sink in the fixative. The bottles were then refrigerated at 0–4 °C until use.

2.2. Electron Microscope

The pollen was dehydrated stepwise with alcohol and then evenly glued onto a circular metal platform with conductive double-sided tape using tweezers. The pollen was gold-coated in an IB-5 ion sputtering apparatus. The coated samples were scanned from different angles to observe the individual, local, and group sculpture of pollen grains and photographed using a JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope. Twenty pollen grains from each species were selected for measurements and observations of sculpture type, polar axis length, equatorial axis length, lumina diameter, and ridge width. The values were averaged and the minimum–maximum range was recorded [13]. The submicroscopic morphology of the pollen grains was described according to Punt et al. [7].

2.3. Data Analysis

Based on the data of six indexes (pollen polar axis length, equatorial axis length, ratio of polar axis length to equatorial axis length, perforation diameter, number of perforations per unit area, and ridge width), systematic cluster analysis in IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 software was used to develop a dendrogram [14].

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. External Pollen Forms

According to Erdtman’s NPC classification system [8], the pollen of the tested peony varieties was classified as N3P4C5. The pollen grains were of monad type, spheroidal or subspheroidal (P/E ranging from 0.91 to 1.03), and symmetrical, except for a few pollen grains with an irregular shape (Table 2 and Figure 1). The size of normally developed grains in the same cultivar was ambiguous, but their size among different varieties was pronounced. The pollen in all tested varieties was circular in polar view and circular or elliptical in equatorial view (Table 2). The varieties with elliptical pollen in equatorial view were: Xueyuanhonghua, Yangfeichuyu, Fenchijinyu, Gaoganhong, Bingshan, Tianshanhongxing, Qingtianlan, Guifeichacui, Dafugui, Dongjingnvlang, and Hongfushi. The varieties with circular pollen in equatorial view were Xuefeng, Hongfeng, Chifen, and Hongxiuqiu.

3.2. Surface Ornamentation Characteristics of Pollen

The exine of the pollen grains of the 15 peony varieties was smooth at light microscope, and with a clearly defined lumina near the equatorial axis at SEM. From the equatorial axis to the poles, the diameter of the lumina gradually decreased, and the shape of the lumina openings was roughly circular or subcircular. According to the quantitative index of peony pollen morphology established by Yuan and Wang [15], the ratio of lumina diameter to ridge width was used as a reference index for the pollen exine sculpture. The exine sculpture can be divided into three types: reticular, pit, and small pit. The reticular exine type was present in Xueyuanhonghua and Fenchijinyu, the small pit type was found in Dafugui, Hongxiuqiu, and Dongjingnvlang, and the pit sculpture was present in Yangfeichuyu, Gaoganhong, Bingshan, Xuefeng, Tianshanhongxing, Qingtianlan, Guifeichacui, Hongfeng, Chifen, and Hongfushi (Table 2 and Figure 2).

3.3. Apertures of the Pollen Grains

The pollen apertures of the 15 herbaceous peony varieties were tricolporate, arranged longitudinally, and equally spaced. The trenches demonstrated slight and gradual narrowing toward the poles along the polar axis. The width of the pores and colpi varied slightly between the varieties. The pore membrane had protrusions in Gaoganhong, Bingshan, and Xuefeng and was without protrusions in Xueyuanhonghua, Yangfeichuyu, Fenchijinyu, Tianshanhongxing, Qingtianlan, Guifeichacui, Dafugui, Hongfeng, Chifen, Hongxiuqiu, Dongjingnvlang, and Hongfushi (Figure 2).

3.4. Pollen Grain Size

The pollen grains of the 15 peony varieties were divided into two size categories: medium (25–50 μm) and small (10–25 μm) (Table 2).
Seven varieties had a polar axis between 10 and 25 μm: Xueyuanhonghua, Yangfeichuyu, Fenchijinyu, Xuefeng, Hongfeng, Dongjingnvlang, and Hongfushi. Among them, the pollen grains of Hongfeng were the smallest (22.62 μm × 23.9 μm).
Eight varieties had a polar axis between 25 and 50 μm: Gaoganhong, Bingshan, Tianshanhongxing, Qingtianlan, Guifeichacui, Dafugui, Chifen, and Hongxiuqiu, with Dafugui having the largest pollen grains (28.3 μm × 27.8 μm).

3.5. Cluster Analysis

The systematic cluster analysis diagram of pollen morphology directly reflects the similarity of various units in the pollen exine sculpture (Figure 3). The closer the kinship, the earlier the aggregation. According to this, the species with close kinship can be determined, and the tested varieties can be divided into three groups.
The pollen morphology of the three varieties in Group I was nearly identical, and the length of polar axis values were mostly 26–28.5 μm. All of the pollen grain indexes of the two varieties in Group II were consistent, except for pore density, which varied slightly between the two varieties. Group Ⅲ includes 10 varieties characterized by the lumina type of pollen pit, circular or subcircular pollen shape in polar view, and P/E values ranging from 0.9 to 1. The ridge width was 0.36 μm in Hongfeng and 0.45–0.55 μm in the other nine varieties.

4. Discussion

4.1. Similarities and Differences in Pollen Submicroscopic Morphological Characteristics among Herbaceous Peony Varieties

The pollen outer wall sculpture varies with species [16,17]. The SEM revealed both similarities and differences in the pollen grains among the 15 herbaceous peony varieties that we examined. The differences were mainly reflected in the external morphology, exine sculpture, apertures, and pollen grain size. In terms of the external morphology, the pollen grains were circular in the polar view, and circular to elliptical in the equatorial view. The equatorial view can be used as a basis for analyzing the relationships among the 15 varieties.
In this study, the pollen grain exine was relatively smooth under the light microscope, and the lumina near the equatorial axis was clear under the SEM. From the equator to the poles, the diameter of the lumina gradually decreased. The lumina shape was roughly circular or elliptical. The morphological differences in the pollen grains were mainly reflected in the number of perforations per unit area, lumina diameter, ridge width, shape in polar view, and sculpture type. The number of perforations per unit area varied with cultivar. There were three basic types of sculpture: reticular, pit, and small pit. The lumina diameters and ridge widths of individual grains of the same pollen were not equal, and the size difference varied with cultivar. There were some differences between the results of this study and those of Xi [18]. The exine sculpture, shape, and size of the pollen grains among different individuals of the same species are not affected by planting location, showing strong conservation [19]. Different test materials may lead to the differences in the above conclusions.
The pollen grains in the studied varieties were tricolporate, arranged longitudinally, and equally spaced. The trenches gradually and slightly narrowed toward the poles along the polar axis. The spindle-shaped colpium was situated near the poles. The width of the colpi varied slightly among cultivar varieties. The pore membrane was either with or without protrusions. The varieties with protrusions included Gaoganhong, Bingshan, and Xuefeng, while the other 12 varieties had no protrusions in the pore membrane. The size of the pollen grains varied by cultivar and were separated into medium (25–50 μm) and small (10–25 μm) sizes. The microstructure of the exine sculpture of the pollen grains was consistent among individuals of the same cultivar, but varied among different varieties. The results of this experiment are consistent with those reported by Jin et al. [20].

4.2. Kinship

Cross breeding is an important way to breed new cut flower varieties and is one of the most widely used and effective methods for breeding [21]. Therefore, understanding the morphological relationship between varieties can help to predict the values for target phenotypes when cross-breeding new varieties. According to the pollen morphological characteristics and cluster analysis diagram, the closer the genetic relationship between varieties, the more subtle the differences in pollen morphological characteristics and exine sculpture. This is consistent with the results of Hao and Ma [12]. The cluster dendrogram based on pollen morphology resolved the three varieties of Gaoganhong, Tianshanhongxing, and Dafugui in the same cluster group (Cluster I) and are therefore closely related. Their petals are waxy in texture, their scales and buds are bamboo shoot-shaped, and their flower buds are pointed peach-shaped. The varieties Xueyuanhonghua and Fenchijinyu belong to the same cluster group (Cluster II) and have the closest relationship. Their petals have a papery texture, the scales and buds are brush-shaped, and the flower buds are crooked peach-shaped. The remaining 10 varieties (Cluster III) were closely related on the basis of pollen morphology. They are characterized by pointed peach-shaped flower buds. The petals of four varieties, Xuefeng, Hongfeng, Dongjingnvlang, and Hongfushi, are leathery in texture, and their scales and buds are in the shape of bamboo shoots. The petals of the remaining six varieties are papery in texture, and the scales and buds are projectile-shaped. This indicated that the pollen morphological characteristics in Clusters Ⅰ and Ⅱ were consistent with the texture of the petals, the shape of the scale buds, and the shape of the flower buds. The morphological characteristics of pollen in Cluster Ⅲ were consistent with the shape of the flower buds, but not with the texture of the petals or the shape of the scale buds.

5. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to provide a basis for the selection of parents of new cut flower varieties in hybrid breeding. The 15 tested peony varieties were clustered into three groups. The pollen morphological characteristics correlated to a certain degree with petal texture and the shape of the scales and flower buds. There was no direct correlation between the morphological characteristics of the pollen and the cultivation type or flower color. These phenotypes may be controlled by multiple genotypes or are the results of long-term natural and artificial selection, which warrants further study. In this study, we studied the pollen morphology of P. lactiflora and compared the characteristics of different varieties. Future research will examine the molecular biology, plant morphology, and plant physiology of the tested varieties to provide a reference for the breeding of Paeonia cut flowers.

Author Contributions

D.Z. and A.X. co-designed and undertook most of the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; X.Y., Y.S., L.Y., L.D. and F.L. participated in the tests and data analysis; J.W. and X.S. co-designed the study and revised drafts of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shandong Province Improved Seed Project (No. 2021S230304-02583).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wodehouse, R.P. Pollen Grains; McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1935. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agababian, V.S. Pollen morphology of the family Magnoliaceae. Grana 1972, 12, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Praglowski, J. World Pollen and Spore Flora; Almqvist & Widsell: Stockholm, Sweden, 1974; Volume 3, pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coimbra, S.; Costa, M. Pollen grain development is compromised in Arabidopsis agp6 agp11 null mutants. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3133–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Doyle, J.A.; Le Thomas, A. Evolution and phylogenetic significance of pollen in Annonaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 169, 190–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aguilar-Garcıá, S.A.; Figueroa-Castro, D.M.; Castañeda-Posadas, C. Pollen morphology of Pachycereus weberi (Cactaceae): An evaluation of variation in pollen size. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 1845–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Punt, W.; Hoen, P.P.; Blackmore, S.; Nilsson, S.; Le Thomas, A. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2007, 143, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erdtman, G. Handbook of Palynology; Translation by Academy of Sciences in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1978; pp. 1–120. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. House, A.; Balkwill, K. FIB-SEM: An additional technique for investigating internal structure of pollen walls. Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19, 1535–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Khan, S.U.; Zafar, M.; Ahmad, M.; Anjum, F.; Sultana, S.; Kilic, O.; Ozdemir, F.A.; Nazir, A.; Yaseen, G.; Aabidin, S.Z.U. Pollen micromorphological analysis of tribe Acacieae (Mimosaceae) with LM and SEM techniques. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2019, 82, 1610–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Guo, X.F.; Wang, L.Y.; Yuan, T. Studies on the pollen morphology of 4 species of wild herbaceous peony. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2005, 41, 184–188. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Hao, L.H.; Ma, H.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Yu, X.N. Pollen morphology of herbaceous peonies (Paeonia L.) with different ploidy levels. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 141, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, S.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, K.; Li, J.; Wei, X.; Xu, Q. Southern China the main crop and vegetable and fruit modern pollen morphology and agriculture archaeology research value. Acta Micropalaeontol. Sin. 2012, 29, 80–98. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Mert, C. Pollen morphology and anatomy of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) varieties. HortScience 2009, 44, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yuan, T.; Wang, L. Discussion on several peony pollen morphology and evolution of wild species of classification. J. Beijing Univ. 1999, 21, 17–21. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, Y.J.; Wang, J.C.; Xiong, Y.M.; Liu, R.Z.; Huang, X.F.; Yang, L.; Shen, C.G. Morphological characteristics of pollen grains from 16 germplasms of pitaya. Fresenius Environ. Bul. 2020, 29, 1522–1533. [Google Scholar]
  17. Piwowarczyk, R.; Rura, K.; Krasylenko, Y.; Kasińska, J.; Pedraja, S.S. Seed micromorphology of representatives of holoparasitic Orobanchaceae genera from the Caucasus region and its taxonomic significance. Phytotaxa 2020, 432, 223–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xi, Y. The pollen morphology and exine ultrastructure of China Paeonia. Acta Bot. Sin. 1984, 26, 241–246. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Humphrey, R.P. Pollen heteromorphism is pervasive in Thalictrum (Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2016, 302, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, B.; He, X.; Wu, J.; Ding, L. The relationship between morphological characteristics of pollen and cultivar evolution. Jiangsu J. Ag. Sci. 2005, 21, 63–68. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, W.; Guan, W.L.; Li, Y.F.; Peng, L.C.; Zhang, L.; Meng, J.; Wang, J.H.; Song, J. Cytology and pollen morphology of Bougainvillea glabra ‘Elizabeth Angus,’ a cultivar with low pollen fertility. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 301, 111105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. External morphology of Paeonia lactiflora flowers: (1), Xueyuanhonghua; (2), Yangfeichuyu; (3), Fenchijinyu; (4), Gaoganhong; (5), Bingshan; (6), Xuefeng; (7), Tianshanhongxing; (8), Qingtianlan; (9), Guifeichacui; (10), Dafugui; (11), Hongfeng; (12), Chifen; (13), Hongxiuqiu; (14), Dongjingnvlang; (15), Hongfushi.
Figure 1. External morphology of Paeonia lactiflora flowers: (1), Xueyuanhonghua; (2), Yangfeichuyu; (3), Fenchijinyu; (4), Gaoganhong; (5), Bingshan; (6), Xuefeng; (7), Tianshanhongxing; (8), Qingtianlan; (9), Guifeichacui; (10), Dafugui; (11), Hongfeng; (12), Chifen; (13), Hongxiuqiu; (14), Dongjingnvlang; (15), Hongfushi.
Horticulturae 08 01161 g001
Figure 2. Pollen morphological characteristics of Paeonia lactiflora varieties: 1-1, 1-2, 1-3: Xueyuanhonghua; 2-1, 2-2, 2-3: Yangfeichuyu; 3-1, 3-2, 3-3: Fenchijinyu; 4-1, 4-2, 4-3: Gaoganhong; 5-1, 5-2, 5-3: Bingshan; 6-1, 6-2, 6-3: Xuefeng; 7-1, 7-2, 7-3: Tianshanhongxing; 8-1, 8-2, 8-3: Qingtianlan; 9-1, 9-2, 9-3: Guifeichacui; 10-1, 10-2, 10-3: Dafugui; 11-1, 11-2, 11-3: Hongfeng; 12-1, 12-2, 12-3: Chifen; 13-1, 13-2, 13-3: Hongxiuqiu; 14-1, 14-2, 14-3: Dongjingnvlang; 15-1, 15-2, 15-3: Hongfushi.
Figure 2. Pollen morphological characteristics of Paeonia lactiflora varieties: 1-1, 1-2, 1-3: Xueyuanhonghua; 2-1, 2-2, 2-3: Yangfeichuyu; 3-1, 3-2, 3-3: Fenchijinyu; 4-1, 4-2, 4-3: Gaoganhong; 5-1, 5-2, 5-3: Bingshan; 6-1, 6-2, 6-3: Xuefeng; 7-1, 7-2, 7-3: Tianshanhongxing; 8-1, 8-2, 8-3: Qingtianlan; 9-1, 9-2, 9-3: Guifeichacui; 10-1, 10-2, 10-3: Dafugui; 11-1, 11-2, 11-3: Hongfeng; 12-1, 12-2, 12-3: Chifen; 13-1, 13-2, 13-3: Hongxiuqiu; 14-1, 14-2, 14-3: Dongjingnvlang; 15-1, 15-2, 15-3: Hongfushi.
Horticulturae 08 01161 g002
Figure 3. Clustering diagram of 15 varieties of Paeonia lactiflora.
Figure 3. Clustering diagram of 15 varieties of Paeonia lactiflora.
Horticulturae 08 01161 g003
Table 1. Main morphological characteristics of the varieties of Paeonia lactiflora in the test.
Table 1. Main morphological characteristics of the varieties of Paeonia lactiflora in the test.
Pollen CodeCultivar TypeBulbil ShapeBud ShapeFlower ColorPetal Texture
1Pavilion typeBrush-shapedInclined sharp-pointed peach-shapedWhitePapery
2Crown typeProjectile-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedWhitePapery
3Rose typeBamboo-shapedInclined sharp-pointed peach-shapedPinkLeathery
4Colorful-ball typeProjectile-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedRedWaxy
5Crown typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedWhitePapery
6Crown typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedWhitePapery
7Rose typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedWhiteWaxy
8Rose typeBrush-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedSoft redPapery
9Crown typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedPinkPapery
10Rose typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedRedWaxy
11Colorful-ball typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedRedPapery
12Rose typeBrush-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedPinkPapery
13Crown typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedRedWaxy
14Rose typeBamboo-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedPinkLeathery
15Colorful-ball typeBrush-shapedSharp-pointed peach-shapedBurgundyWaxy
1, Xueyuanhonghua; 2, Yangfeichuyu; 3, Fenchijinyu; 4, Gaoganhong; 5, Bingshan; 6, Xuefeng; 7, Tianshanhongxing; 8, Qingtianlan; 9, Guifeichacui; 10, Dafugui; 11, Hongfeng; 12, Chifen; 13, Hongxiuqiu; 14, Dongjingnvlang; 15, Hongfushi.
Table 2. Pollen grain characteristics of Paeonia lactiflora varieties.
Table 2. Pollen grain characteristics of Paeonia lactiflora varieties.
Pollen CodeLength of Polar Axis (μm)Length of Equatorial Axis (μm)P/EPerforation Number per 100 μm2Lumina Diameter (μm)Ridge Width (μm)D/WShape of Two PolesType of Exine Sculpture
123
(18.5–26.4)
25.3
(21.2–28.4)
0.911400.600.411.46circular and ellipticalreticular
224.14
(21.6–26)
26.3
(21.6–29.4)
0.921450.600.511.18circular and ellipticalpit
324.3
(22–27.2)
26.4
(23.8–28.6)
0.92850.820.591.39circular and ellipticalreticular
426.7
(22.4–29.6)
26.9
(21.6–30.2)
0.991020.550.580.95circular and ellipticalpit
527.2
(23–31.5)
27.8
(24.8–30.2)
0.981400.570.491.20circular and ellipticalpit
624.3
(20–28.2)
25.4
(23.6–26.8)
0.961700.440.510.86circularpit
727
(21.6–31.2)
26.3
(21.6–29.2)
1.03700.570.690.83circular and ellipticalpit
825
(32.1–22.2)
25.6
(20.6–28.5)
0.981300.560.501.12circular and ellipticalpit
925.4
(20.8–29.6)
25.7
(19–30.8)
0.991250.480.480.86circular and ellipticalpit
1028.3
(24.4–31.6)
27.8
(22.6–31.4)
1.021000.500.610.82circular and ellipticalsmall pit
1122.62
(17.8–26)
23.9
(14.8–28.4)
0.951450.350.360.97circularpit
1225.7
(20.8–28.87)
26.6
(22–28.4)
0.971250.550.451.22circularpit
1325.2
(21.8–27.8)
25.3
(20.4–27.6)
1.001250.480.570.84circularsmall pit
1422.4
(17.8–25.8)
24.3
(17.6–29.6)
0.921600.370.420.88circular and ellipticalsmall pit
1524.7
(19–29.2)
26.2
(23–29)
0.941600.490.411.2circular and ellipticalpit
1, Xueyuanhonghua; 2, Yangfeichuyu; 3, Fenchijinyu; 4, Gaoganhong; 5, Bingshan; 6, Xuefeng; 7, Tianshanhongxing; 8, Qingtianlan; 9, Guifeichacui; 10, Dafugui; 11, Hongfeng; 12, Chifen; 13, Hongxiuqiu; 14, Dongjingnvlang; 15, Hongfushi.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, D.; Xie, A.; Yang, X.; Shi, Y.; Yang, L.; Dong, L.; Lei, F.; Wu, J.; Sun, X. Study of 15 Varieties of Herbaceous Peony Pollen Submicroscopic Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121161

AMA Style

Zhang D, Xie A, Yang X, Shi Y, Yang L, Dong L, Lei F, Wu J, Sun X. Study of 15 Varieties of Herbaceous Peony Pollen Submicroscopic Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(12):1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Dongliang, Anqi Xie, Xiao Yang, Yajie Shi, Lijin Yang, Lingling Dong, Fuling Lei, Jingyue Wu, and Xia Sun. 2022. "Study of 15 Varieties of Herbaceous Peony Pollen Submicroscopic Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships" Horticulturae 8, no. 12: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121161

APA Style

Zhang, D., Xie, A., Yang, X., Shi, Y., Yang, L., Dong, L., Lei, F., Wu, J., & Sun, X. (2022). Study of 15 Varieties of Herbaceous Peony Pollen Submicroscopic Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships. Horticulturae, 8(12), 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8121161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop