Next Article in Journal
Taste Beats Reputation in New Food Products Choice: The Case of Ready-to-Eat Pomegranate among Young Consumers in Veneto Region (Italy)
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Physiological Response of Potato Plants to Entomopathogenic Fungi under Hydroponic Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Neglected and Underutilized Plant Species (NUS) from the Apulia Region Worthy of Being Rescued and Re-Included in Daily Diet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Control of the Raspberry Eriophyoid Mite Phyllocoptes gracilis Using Entomopathogenic Fungi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 7
10.3390/horticulturae7070178
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant

by
Matej Vosnjak
1,*,
Matevz Likar
2 and
Gregor Osterc
1
1
Department of Agronomy, Fruit, Viticulture and Vegetable Growing, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Department of Biology, Botany and Plant Physiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vecna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(7), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 3 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Microbe-Assisted Production of Horticultural Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The influence of mycorrhizal inoculum in combination with different phosphorus treatments on growth and flowering parameters of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) plants was investigated in two growing seasons (2015 and 2016). Plants of the cultivar ‘Silver and Gold’ were transplanted into pots either with added mycorrhizal inoculum or without inoculum and assigned to four phosphorus treatments. Mycorrhizal colonization was assessed by evaluating the frequency of colonization, intensity of colonization and density of fungal structures (arbuscules, vesicles, coils and microsclerotia) in the roots. During the growing season, the content of plant available phosphorus in the soil was analyzed, and shoot length, number of shoots, number of inflorescences, number of flowers and flowering time were evaluated. Inoculated Ajania plants were successfully colonized with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytic fungi. In the root segments, hyphae were mainly observed, as well as vesicles, coils, arbuscules and microsclerotia, but in lower density. The density of fungal structures did not differ among phosphorus treatments, but did differ between years, with a higher density of fungal structures in 2016. Mycorrhizal plants developed higher number of shoots in 2016, higher number of inflorescences, higher number of flowers, and they flowered longer compared to uninoculated plants.

1. Introduction

Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) is the most common form of endomycorrhiza. It is a symbiotic relationship between soil fungi from the phylum Glomeromycota [1] and the roots of higher plants in which there is a characteristic intracellular and intercellular proliferation of hyphae in the parenchymal and epidermal cells of the primary cortex of the root. With the help of AM, the metabolism between the two partners is improved and the area of water uptake with minerals is up to forty times larger, to which extracellular hyphae contribute [2]. Symbiosis with AM fungi has many beneficial effects on plants. An important effect of this symbiosis may be an increase in the uptake of mineral nutrients from the soil, especially relatively immobile ones such as phosphate [3]. The fungus provides mineral nutrients, mainly phosphorus (in the form of phosphate) [4], hormones and water to the plant via the fungal mycelium, and the plant fungus provides energy (in the form of sugars) [5]. AM root colonization is an important factor affecting seedling development and competition with other species. The degree of colonization depends, among other factors, on the nutrient conditions in the substrate, especially the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, which are considered the most restrictive nutrients for plant growth [6]. Mycorrhizae enhance the uptake of nutrients by the plant by increasing the absorptive surface of the receiving system. Mycorrhizal plants are able to obtain more nutrients from nutrient-poor soils than non-mycorrhizal plants because the hyphae of mycorrhizal plants use a larger soil volume [7]. It has been reported that mycorrhizae play little or no role in substrates where there is high availability and supply of nutrients, especially phosphorus [6,8]. Plants colonized with AM fungi are often colonized with dark septate endophytic (DSE) fungi [9], which belong to the class Ascomycetes [10] and contain structures called microsclerotia. The effect of DSEs on plant growth and mineral nutrition can be positive or negative depending on the plant species and environment [11]. In general, DSEs improve plant growth and development, enhance plant tolerance to various environmental stressors, play a role in phytohormone production, plant nutrient supply, degradation of complex carbohydrates and plant simple sugars, increase photosynthetic activity, and regulate the concentration of plant metabolites [12,13,14,15].
Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) is a perennial ornamental plant in the Asteraceae family. It is a relative of chrysanthemum and also a short-day plant [16,17], flowering in a short day, so the production technology is very similar to that of chrysanthemum. It is mostly used as a pot plant, for garden beds, as attractive single plants, but there are also varieties used for cut flowers. It could be an interesting alternative to the well-known chrysanthemum in the future [16]. The cultivar ‘Silver and Gold’ is probably the most popular cultivar of the genus Ajania, mainly because of the ornamental value of the leaves and the flower [16].
The positive influence of AM fungi on the growth and development of herbaceous perennials in pot experiments and in the greenhouse is cited by many authors in their studies. McGraw and Schenck [18] and Sohn et al. [19] in an experiment on chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) reported better rooting of cuttings, longer roots, more lateral roots, greater shoot growth, faster flowering and more and larger inflorescences in plants to which inoculum was added. Gaur et al. [20] found higher dry matter, larger plants, higher number of flowers, and earlier flowering in an experiment with petunia (Petunia hybrida Vilm.) with added inoculum. Hemla Naik et al. [21] found higher shoot dry matter, improved phosphorus supply, higher flower yield and fertilizer saving (25% less phosphorus) in inoculated Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees plants. Asrar et al. [22], in an experiment on flowering Kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln.) plants found that inoculated plants had higher number of flowers and shoot dry matter compared to uninoculated plants. Moreover, some authors reported improved response of inoculated Antirrhinum majus L. [23], Dianthus caryophyllus L. [24], Imaptiens balsamina L. [25], Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln. plants [22] to different stressors.
To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature on the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and flowering of Ajania plants. The aim of our study was to investigate (i) the degree of colonization of the root system of Ajania by mycorrhizal fungi, (ii) how the addition of phosphorus affects the colonization of plants by mycorrhizal fungi, (iii) the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on shoot length, number of shoots and flowering time of Ajania plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

A two-year pot experiment with Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) plants, cultivar ‘Silver and Gold’ was conducted in the greenhouse at the Biotechnical Faculty of the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia (46°2′ N, 14°28′ E, 297 m a.s.l.). The growing conditions (temperature, humidity, lighting, etc.) in the greenhouse were in accordance with the recommendations for growing chrysanthemums [26].
In the experiment, 40 annual seedlings cut to 4–5 cm height were planted on 26 May 2015 in Humko substrate consisting of 40% white peat (50% fractionated, 50% std), 20% black peat, 20% lava, 15% pumice, 5% zeolite, with pH 6.05 and 43.9 mg P2O5 L−1 substrate in pots of 1 L volume. At the time of planting, 40 mL of AM fungal inoculum was added to half of the plants in the root zone (inoculated plants). Commercially available inoculum Symbivit (Symbiom Ltd., Sázava, Czech Republic) with six AM fungal species (Glomus etunicatum WN Becker and Gerd., Glomus microaggregatum Koske, Gemma and PD Olexia, Glomus intraradices NC Schenck and GS Sm., Glomus claroideum NC Schenck and GS Sm., Glomus mosseae (TH Nicolson and Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe and Glomus geosporum (TH Nicolson and Gerd. C.) Walker) was used. The inoculum contained no other ingredients that could have a direct positive or negative effect on plant performance (www.symbiom.cz (accessed on 25 February 2021)). Other plants were planted without added AM fungal inoculum (uninoculated plants).
Two factors, mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus treatment, were studied in our experiment. The phosphorus treatment included four levels of substrate fertilization (Control, P1, P2, and P3) that differed in the amount of phosphorus added (Table 1). The control treatment did not receive phosphorus through superphosphate fertilizer. Forty pots were randomly arranged and placed in a greenhouse. Each combination of two inoculum-phosphorus factors (8 treatments) was carried out in five replicates. Later, in early June, 8 g of meat bone meal per liter of substrate was added to all plants by sprinkling. Meat bone meal (K3 Koto, Koto, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was added in the form of powder (particles up to 2 mm in size) containing 6–8% P2O5. Thus, each plant received 0.5 g of P2O5 L−1 substrate.
In accordance with the experimental design, only plants in treatments P1, P2 and P3 were fertilized with superphosphate (26% P2O5, Fertoz Co., Melbourne, Australia) for the first time in mid-June and then at regular weekly fertilizations. At the same time, all plants were fertilized with potassium and nitrogen fertilizers. For the potassium treatments, commercial fertilizer 0-0-60 (The Andersons, Inc., Maumee, OH, USA) was used. For the nitrogen treatments, KAN-Kutina (Calcium Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer, Petrokemija, Kutina, Croatia) was used, which contains equal amounts of nitrogen in nitrate and in ammonium forms (soluble mineral forms) (Table 1).
Twice during the growing season in 2015 (3 July and 30 September) and in 2016 (27 July and 11 October), the same amount of substrate (10 g) was taken from the root zone per pot to analyze the content of plant-available phosphorus according to the Egner–Riehm–Domingo AL method [27].

2.2. Measurements of Plant Growth and Flowering Parameters

During the growing season, growth parameters (total shoot length and total number of shoots) per plant were monitored four times in 2015 (on 19 June, 4 July, 4 August and 30 September) and five times in 2016 (17 April, 15 May, 28 June, 4 August and 13 September). In addition, flowering parameters (total number of flowers, total number of inflorescences, and total flowering time per plant) were monitored during the growing seasons. Due to excessive elongation of shoots, some of them also broke off at the end of the growing season.

2.3. Assessment of Root Mycorrhizal Colonization

Fine lateral roots (3 g), 1 cm long, smaller than 3 mm in diameter, were collected from inoculated and uninoculated plants during flowering to assess mycorrhizal colonization. The substrate was manually cleaned from the roots and washed under running and distilled water. The cleaned roots were kept in tubes and stored in distilled water in a refrigerator at 4 °C until further work in the laboratory.
To estimate of mycorrhizal colonization, roots were prepared according to the modified method of Phillips and Hayman [28]. The roots were soaked in 10% KOH for 30 min at 90 °C, then washed under running water and stained with trypan blue. Subsequently, the stained roots were dried at 90 °C for 10–15 min. Each root sample consisted of 30 fragments of 1 cm length.
Mycorrhizal colonization was assessed according to the method of Trouvelot et al. [29], as previously described in Alarcón and Cuenca [30]. The degree of mycorrhizal colonization was evaluated microscopically in lactoglycerol using Mycocalc software (Wuhan, Hubei, China). This method allows simultaneous evaluation of the frequency of colonization (F%), the intensity of colonization (M%), the proportion of AM fungal structures (arbuscules (A%), vesicles (V%) and coils (C%)) and the proportion of DSE fungal structures (microsclerotia (MS%)) in the roots.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was set up as a factorial design. The analysis was performed using the software version 3.6.1. of the R statistical environment [31]. The plant available phosphorus and mycorrhizal colonization data were subjected to two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (factors phosphorus treatment and time), while data regarding flowering were subjected to three-factor ANOVA (factors: mycorrhizal inoculation, phosphorus treatment and time). The phosphorus treatment factor had four levels (Control, P1, P2 and P3) and the mycorrhizal inoculation factor had two levels (inoculated and uninoculated). In the analysis of plant available phosphorus data, the time factor had 4 levels (3 July 2015, 30 September 2015, 27 July 2016 and 11 October 2016), while in the analysis of mycorrhizal colonization and flowering data it had 2 levels (2015 and 2016). Duncan’s multiple range test was then performed at a significance level of p < 0.05 to detect significant differences between means, where required. Growth parameter data (total shoot length and total number of shoots) were subjected to a linear mixed model (lme function in the nlme package) where the dependence of measurements on the same pot over time was considered, including the random effect of pot. The model included three factors (time with 4 levels in 2015 and 5 levels in 2016; factor phosphorus treatment with 4 levels and factor mycorrhizal inoculation with two levels). When the analysis of variance showed statistically significant results (see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for growth parameters in 2015 and 2016, respectively), a contrast analysis was performed using a generalized hypothesis testing procedure, considering simultaneous hypothesis tests. If the p-value for differences between means was less than 0.05, the difference was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Phosphorus Available to Plants

In our experiment, the content of plant available phosphorus in the soil increased over all sampling times in both years according to the experimental design (Table 2). The control treatment had the lowest content of plant available phosphorus in the soil, followed by P1, while P2 and P3 had the highest values of phosphorus available to plants. In 2015, the content of plant-available phosphorus in the soil was higher than in 2016, with the sampling date of 11 October 2016 showing the highest values. With the additional fertilization during the growing season and the addition of meat bone meal, phosphorus levels in the substrate on average increased from double (Control) to almost four times (P3) the recommended levels for growing chrysanthemum by the end of the experiment.

3.2. Mycorrhizal Colonization

No mycorrhizal colonization with AM fungi or DSE fungi was observed in the control (uninoculated) roots, whereas in all observed root segments of the inoculated plants, mycorrhizal abundance (F%) averaged 100% (±0%) in both years, indicating that certain fungal structures were present. Arbuscules, vesicles and coils were observed among AM fungal structures, while microsclerotia among DSE fungal structures. The intensity of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and the frequency of observed fungal structures did not differ statistically significantly among phosphorus treatments, but did differ between years, except for the frequency of arbuscules. The results showed that arbuscules were not present in 2015, while they were present in 2016, but their density was not significantly different between years. The density of vesicles, coils and microsclerotia was significantly higher in 2016, compared to 2015 (Table 3).

3.3. Growth and Flowering

According to the model, time affected the total shoot length of the plants in 2015 and 2016 (Tables S1 and S2; Figure 1 and Figure 2). Ajania grew more in 2016 than in 2015 (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
In addition, the results showed statistically significant effect of triple interaction time × inoculum × phosphorus treatment (p < 0.05) on total shoot length in 2016 (Table S2). Inoculated control plants had statistically significant lower (p < 0.05) shoot length than inoculated plants of P3-phosphorus treatment. Only inoculated Ajania plants of the P3 phosphorus treatment had a statistically significant increase in shoot length (on average 1.67 ± 0.12 cm per day) compared to inoculated control plants (on average 1.15 ± 0.12 cm per day).
In 2015, time had a statistically significant effect on the total number of shoots in 2015 (Table S1). In 2016, however, analysis of the data showed a statistically significant effect of time, and the two-factor interactions inoculum × time and phosphorus treatment×time on the number of shoots (Table S2). In 2015, the analysis showed a statistically significant negative trend over time at the 95% confidence level and the number of shoots significantly decreased over time in traces (on average for 0.007 ± 0.0 shoots per day). In 2016, the number of shoots increased statistically more over time in plants with added inoculum than in plants without inoculum (Figure 2).
Flowering of the Ajania plants in our study was weak, which contributed to greater variability in the data. Analysis of variance showed statistically significant effect of inoculum on the flowering parameters evaluated (p < 0.01) in our study in both years. Inoculated plants developed on average statistically significantly more inflorescences, a greater number of flowers, and had a longer flowering time than uninoculated plants (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The influence of mycorrhizal inoculum in combination with different phosphorus treatments on mycorrhizal colonization, shoot length and flowering of Ajania plants was investigated in the present study by evaluating the frequency, intensity of mycorrhizal colonization, abundance of different mycorrhizal structures, measurement of shoot length, number of shoots and evaluation of flowering parameters of the plants.
Our results show that mycorrhization of the inoculated plants was successful. Among the fungal structures, hyphae, vesicles, coils, arbuscules and microsclerotia were observed, indicating the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and dark septate endophytic (DSE) fungi. AM fungi form different structures that can be present both in the substrate in which the plant grows and in the roots of the host plant [1]. In our study, hyphae that are non-septate and extend into the primary root tissue were observed mainly in root segments. Arbuscules were observed only in 2016. Arbuscules are short-lived branched hyphal structures that decay after a few days [5]. Due to their large surface area, they represent the most important site for metabolic nutrient exchange between the fungus and the plant, in addition to the hyphae [1,4]. The absence of arbuscules can be influenced by the needs of the plant, the season or the stress to which plants are exposed in the environment (physicochemical properties of the soil, the availability of water and biogenic elements, agricultural practices, and weather conditions) [32], or by the developmental cycle of the plant [4]. If the mycorrhiza is functional, a large turnover of these structures can be expected due to their short-lived nature. Vesicles were observed in the roots in both years, but their density was higher in 2016. These are long-lived structures, similar to hyphae, and can remain in the root for several months [5,6]. They are normally formed in the period from mid to late vegetative growth, in the period after the development of the first arbuscules, as well as after the decay of the arbuscules [5]. They have a storage function, especially for lipids [5]. The coils were present in both years, but their density was higher in 2016. The coils are in contact with the cell membrane and may serve as an exchange site for nutrients [3] during the flowering phase, when the nutrient demand of the plant is highest [33]. In addition, the presence of DSE fungi and their microsclerotial structures were detected in both years, with a higher density in 2016. The effects of DSE on the host plant have not been well studied. Their effect on plant growth and mineral nutrition can be positive or negative depending on the plant species and environment [11]. DSE fungi increase the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus into the plant [34] and improve plant growth, especially under controlled conditions, especially when nitrogen is present in organic form [9]. In our study, less or no mycorrhizal colonization was observed on root segments with many root hairs. The intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in our study might be related to the morphology of Ajania, which has a stronger root system, with more root hairs. It has been found that plants with a simple root system, with few or no root hairs, are generally more susceptible to mycorrhizal colonization than plants with a stronger root system, such as grasses [35].
As Azcon-Aguilar and Barea [36] reported, several factors are important for successful mycorrhizal inoculation. In addition to agronomic practices, these are sufficient doses of inoculum and timing of inoculation or developmental stage of the plant at the time of addition of inoculum. Barea et al. [5] found that the earlier the inoculation is carried out, the greater are the beneficial effects on the plant.
In our experiment, a substrate with low phosphorus content (control) could not be provided, because the substrate had high phosphorus content due to excessive release of phosphorus by the added meat bone meal. The additional fertilization during the growing season and the addition of meat bone meal increased the phosphorus content in the substrate from two to five times the recommended levels for growing chrysanthemums (500 mg L−1 substrate) [26] by the end of the experiment. Phosphorus concentrations and varying inorganic phosphate supply in our experiment far exceeded this level, so that effective differences between treatments P1, P2 and P3, in terms of available phosphorus in the substrate, were not achieved. High phosphorus concentrations most likely affected mycorrhization in our study. Shukla et al. [37] reported phosphorus thresholds for AM colonization of Phaseolus mungo Roxb. and Triticum aestivum L. They found that phosphorus thresholds for maximum benefit from AM symbiosis varied from 5 to 20 μg g−1 in the observed plant species. Additionally, Habte and Manjunath [38] reported that when the phosphorus concentration in the soil solution is at or near 0.002 mg L−1, most plant species respond dramatically to mycorrhizal colonization, but when the phosphorus concentration increases from this level to 0.02 mg L−1, the dependence of plants on mycorrhizal fungi for phosphorus uptake gradually decreases, and at 0.2 mg L−1, only the very highly mycorrhizal-dependent species respond significantly to mycorrhizal colonization. In the control pots, the substrate was not fertilized with superphosphate, but only with meat bone meal, but the amount of phosphorus available to plants increased. The increase was mainly due to the addition of meat bone meal, from which the phosphorus was apparently released slowly over the duration of the experiment, which was not foreseen in the experimental design. The meat bone meal we used in the experiment is a by-product of the meat industry and an important route for nitrogen and phosphorus recycling [39]. The added meat bone meal served as an initial source of phosphorus for better fungal growth, and plants generally have difficult access to the phosphorus in meat bone meal. Phosphorus in meat bone meal is present as hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH) in the bone fraction and in organic form in the meat fraction [40,41,42].
The release of phosphorus from meat bone meal depends on the product and the properties of the substrate [43]. Since H+ ions are important for the solubility of apatite in the bone fraction, pH is a key factor affecting the release of phosphorus from the bone fraction [41]. We hypothesize that the greater release of phosphorus from meat bone meal was most likely due to the favorable pH of the substrate, which has a positive effect on phosphorus release. The pH of the substrate in which the plants were planted was 6.05. As reported by Boen and Haraldsen [43], Chen et al. [40] and Jeng et al. [41], phosphorus from meat bone meal is released more rapidly at acidic pH, resulting in higher availability, and less at basic pH. Organically bound phosphorus in meat and bone meal is converted to inorganic phosphate by mineralization, which is more soluble and accessible to plants than phosphorus in the inorganic (bone) fraction [41]. In addition, it has been reported that the release of phosphorus from meat bone meal is time dependent. In the first year after the addition of meat bone meal, only 19% of phosphorus from meat bone meal is available to plants, but in the second and third year, this availability increases to 63% [40,43]. Inorganically bound phosphorus in meat bone meal is in principle more difficult to access for plants, but also in our case, it has been shown that phosphorus is rapidly released into the substrate solution mainly due to the pH value and was thus readily available for plants [40,41,43].
The success of mycorrhizal colonization depends on the nutrient conditions in the substrate, especially the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, which are considered the most restrictive nutrients for plant growth [6,44]. It has been reported that AM fungi play little or no role in substrates where there is high availability and supply of nutrients [8]. Both plants and fungi can access phosphorus, albeit with varying degrees of success, through specific mechanisms such as phosphatases released into the rhizosphere. AM fungi secrete phosphatase enzymes that hydrolyze phosphate from organically bound phosphorus, which improves plant productivity and increases the uptake of ammonium ions, non-mobile trace elements such as copper and zinc, and other cations (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) [2,6]. Higher phosphorus concentrations in the substrate usually inhibit the development of mycorrhizal colonization of roots [45] and reduce the ability of the host plant to develop symbiosis with AM fungi [46]. In addition, higher phosphorus concentrations, as observed in our study, are expected to result in slower and poorer infection, reduced ability to form spores, arbuscules, vesicles and other fungal structures (or these are smaller and less numerous), poorer germination of AM spores, slower hyphal growth and changes in root secretion content [47].
Although due to the higher levels of phosphorus available to plants in our study, mycorrhizal colonization was successful but weaker. Nevertheless, some significant differences in growth and flowering parameters were observed between inoculated and uninoculated plants. Mycorrhizal plants had a higher number of shoots than uninoculated plants in 2016. Increased growth and development in mycorrhizal plants, compared to non-mycorrhizal, has been reported for many different species (reviewed in Smith and Read [3]). The growth of the Ajania plants used in our study was greater in 2016 than in 2015. Herbaceous perennials, like Ajania, do not die after the end of the growing season, but sprout more vigorously from the strengthened underground root parts the next season. The number of shoots decreased slightly over time in our study, which was due to shoot breakage and was not influenced by the factors studied. Ajania plants were more elongated in the experiment, probably due to fertilization and favorable conditions in the greenhouse, which may influence shoot breakage at the end of the growing season. A similar phenomenon has been reported for some other cultivated herbaceous perennials [48,49].
Many plants in our experiment did not flower because they grew under natural conditions. Since Ajania is a short-day plant, its flowering depends on the length of the day, with a short day being crucial. Better, more uniform flowering and better flower quality could be achieved by darkening or artificially shortening the day [26,50], but this is not normally applied to perennials [26]. Such a technique is only possible when the plants are cultivated indoors, which is avoided in perennials. In practice, Ajania as a perennial plant is usually cultivated outdoors where the plants are exposed to natural day shortening. Therefore, we did not artificially darken the plants in the experiment but left them to natural conditions. Under such conditions, the plants flower unevenly and of inferior quality.
The inoculum had a significant effect on the observed flowering parameters Mycorrhizal plants in our study had a higher number of inflorescences, higher number of flowers, and plants flowered longer than uninoculated plants. In accordance with our results, higher yield was reported for mycorrhizal Tagetes erecta L. [51] and Gazania rigens L. [52] compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. According to studies by Garmendia and Mangas [53] on roses and Scagel and Schreiner [54] on Zantedeschia plants, AM fungi affect flowering by shortening the time to flower formation, increasing the number of flowers per plant, and/or extending the flowering time of the plant. Aboul-Nasr [55] reported earlier and longer flowering with higher number of flowers and inflorescences of mycorrhizal Zinnias and Tagetes than non-mycorrhizal plants.
In our study, the inflorescences of the mycorrhizal Ajania plants developed gradually and not all at once, so that the plants with more developed inflorescences had a longer flowering period. Similarly, McGraw and Schenck [18] reported a positive effect of AM fungi on flowering time, number of flowers and inflorescences of chrysanthemum. Similar results on the positive effect of AM fungi were also reported in Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees [21], Petunia hybrida Vilm., Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees and Impatiens balsamina L. [20], and Zantedeschia Sprengel. [54]. Mycorrhizal plants accumulate nutrients in a shorter time so that they are adequately supplied with the nutrients they need to begin flower development and prolong flowering at an early stage of development [55].

5. Conclusions

Our results show that inoculated Ajania plants were successfully colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytic fungi, as specific fungal structures were observed in all root segments examined. Mainly hyphae were observed in the root segments, as well as vesicles, coils, arbuscules and microsclerotia, but their density was lower, probably due to the higher concentrations of phosphorus available to the plants. Higher density of fungal structures was observed in 2016. Mycorrhizal plants had higher number of shoots in 2016, higher number of inflorescences, higher number of flowers and longer flowering time than uninoculated non-mycorrhizal plants. The study of the positive effects of mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and flowering of Ajania plants provides useful information for the cultivation of Ajania plants and other related herbaceous perennial species.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7070178/s1, Table S1: Statistically significant differences (lme model) for main effects and interactions for the total shoot length and total number of shoots of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels in 2015, Table S2: Statistically significant differences (lme model) for main effects and interactions for the total shoot length and total number of shoots of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels in 2016.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V., M.L. and G.O.; methodology, M.V., M.L. and G.O.; software, M.V.; validation, G.O., formal analysis, M.V.; investigation, M.V., M.L. and G.O.; resources, M.V. and G.O.; data curation, M.V. and G.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.V.; writing—review and editing, M.V.; visualization, M.V.; supervision, G.O.; project administration, M.V. and G.O.; funding acquisition, M.V. and G.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), Young Researchers Program (M.V.) and research core funding no. P4-0013 (M.V., G.O.). The authors acknowledge the financial support of the ARRS within the infrastructural center IC RRC-AG (IO-0022-0481-001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Quilambo, O.A. The vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2003, 2, 539–546. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rouphael, Y.; Franken, P.; Schneider, C.; Schwarz, D.; Giovannetti, M.; Agnolucci, M.; De Pascale, S.; Bonini, P.; Colla, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; p. 803. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.; Maldonado-Mendoza, I.; Lopez-Meyer, M.; Weidmann, S.; Harrison, M.J. Arbuscular mycorrhiza. In The Medicago Truncatula Handbook; Mathesius, U., Journet, E.P., Sumner, L.W., Eds.; Noble Research Institute: Ardmore, OK, USA, 2006; Available online: http://www.noble.org/MedicagoHandbook/ (accessed on 27 April 2021).
  5. Barea, J.-M.; Ferrol, N.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Azcón, R. Mycorrhizal symbioses. In The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions; White, P.J., Hammond, J.P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 7, pp. 143–163. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aggarwal, A.; Kadian, N.; Tanwar, A.; Yadav, A.; Gupta, K. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in global sustainable development. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2011, 3, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Entry, J.A.; Rygiewicz, P.T.; Watrud, L.S.; Donnelly, P.K. Influence of adverse soil conditions on the formation and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas. Adv. Environ. Res. 2002, 7, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eschen, R.; Müller-Schärer, H.; Schaffner, U. Plant interspecific differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization as a result of soil carbon addition. Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Thangavelu, M.; Muthuraja, R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal and dark septate endophyte fungal associations in Asparagus. Turk. J. Bot. 2016, 40, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schüβler, A.; Schwarzott, D.; Walker, C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Weishampel, P.A.; Bedford, B.L. Wetland dicots and monocots differ in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jumpponen, A. Dark septate endophytes—Are they mycorrhizal? Mycorrhiza 2001, 11, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Li, L.; Zhao, Z.W. The colonization of plants by dark septate endophytes (DSE) in the valley-type savanna of Yunnan, southwest China. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5540–5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Q.; Gong, M.; Yuan, J.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X. Dark septate endophyte improves drought tolerance in Sorghum. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zubek, S.; Blaszkowski, J.; Mleczko, P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal and dark septate endophyte associations of medicinal plants. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2011, 80, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zalewska, M.; Antkowiak, M. Effect of pinching and day length on the growth and flowering of Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries in controlled cultivation. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cult. 2011, 10, 61–73. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zalewska, M.; Antkowiak, M. Gibberellic acid effect on growth and flowering of Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries. Hortic. Res. 2013, 21, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McGraw, A.; Schenck, N. Growth stimulation of citrus, ornamental and vegetable crops by select mycorrhizal fungi. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 1980, 93, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sohn, B.K.; Kim, K.Y.; Chung, S.J.; Kim, W.S.; Park, S.M.; Kang, J.G.; Rim, Y.S.; Cho, J.S.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, J.H. Effect of the different timing of AMF inoculation on plant growth and flower quality of chrysanthemum. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 98, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gaur, A.; Gaur, A.; Adholeya, A. Growth and flowering in Petunia hybrida, Callistephus chinensis and Impatiens balsamina inoculated with mixed AM inocula or chemical fertilizers in a soil of low P fertility. Sci. Hortic. 2000, 84, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naik, B.H.; Nalawadi, U.; Sreenivasa, M.; Patil, A. Field responses of China aster (Callistephus chinensis (L) Nees.) cv. ‘Ostrich plume’ to the inoculation of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different phosphorus levels. Sci. Hortic. 1995, 62, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asrar, A.; Abdel-Fattah, G.M.; Elhindi, K.M.; Abdel-Salam, E.M. The impact of arbuscular mychorrhizal fungi in improving growth, flower yield and tolerance of kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelin) plants grown in NaCl-stress conditions. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2014, 12, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  23. Asrar, A.; Abdel-Fattah, G.; Elhindi, K. Improving growth, flower yield, and water relations of snapdragon (Antirhinum majus L.) plants grown under well-watered and water-stress conditions using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Navarro, A.; Elia, A.; Conversa, G.; Campi, P.; Mastrorilli, M. Potted mycorrhizal carnation plants and saline stress: Growth, quality and nutritional plant responses. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 140, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Banuelos, J.; Alarcón, A.; Larsen, J.; Cruz-Sánchez, S.; Trejo, D. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Meloidogyne incognita in the ornamental plant Impatiens balsamina. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2014, 14, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pagliarini, N.; Jurjević, Ž.; Vinceljak Toplak, M.; Ostojić, Z.; Vršek, I. Sve o Krizantemi; Hrvatsko Agronomsko Drustvo: Zagreb, Croatia, 1997; p. 170. [Google Scholar]
  27. Egnér, H.; Riehm, H.; Domingo, W. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor-und Kaliumbestimmung. Lantbrukshögskolans Ann. 1960, 26, 199–215. [Google Scholar]
  28. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Trouvelot, A.; Kough, J.L.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Mesure du Taux de Mycorhization VA d’un Système Radiculaire Recherche de Methods D’estimation Ayant une Signification Fonctionnelle. In Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., Gianinazzi, S., Eds.; INRA Publications: Paris, France, 1986; pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  30. Alarcón, C.; Cuenca, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in coastal sand dunes of the Paraguanä Peninsula, Venezuela. Mycorrhiza 2005, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Computer Program, Version 3.6.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019; Available online: http://www.r-project.org (accessed on 25 February 2021).
  32. Jamiołkowska, A.; Księżniak, A.; Gałązka, A.; Hetman, B.; Kopacki, M.; Skwaryło-Bednarz, B. Impact of abiotic factors on development of the community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil: A Review. Int. Agrophys. 2018, 32, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pongrac, P.; Vogel-Mikuš, K.; Kump, P.; Nečemer, M.; Tolrà, R.; Poschenrieder, C.; Barceló, J.; Regvar, M. Changes in elemental uptake and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation during the life cycle of Thlaspi praecox Wulfen. Chemosphere 2007, 69, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. García, I.; Mendoza, R.; Pomar, M.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and dark septate endophytes under contrasting grazing modes in the Magellanic steppe of Tierra del Fuego. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 155, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cronk, J.K.; Fennessy, M.S. Wetland Plants, Biology and Ecology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 1–462. [Google Scholar]
  36. Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Barea, J. Applying mycorrhiza biotechnology to horticulture: Significance and potentials. Sci. Hortic. 1997, 68, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shukla, A.; Kumar, A.; Jha, A.; Rao, D.N. Phosphorus threshold for arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of crops and tree seedlings. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2012, 48, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Habte, M.; Manjunath, A. Categories of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of host species. Mycorrhiza 1991, 1, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kivelä, J.; Chen, L.; Muurinen, S.; Kivijärvi, P.; Hintikainen, V.; Helenius, J. Effects of meat bone meal as fertilizer on yield and quality of sugar beet and carrot. Agric. Food Sci. 2015, 24, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, L.; Kivelä, J.; Helenius, J.; Kangas, A. Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat. Agric. Food Sci. 2011, 20, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jeng, A.S.; Haraldsen, T.K.; Grønlund, A.; Pedersen, P.A. Meat and bone meal as nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer to cereals and rye grass. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2006, 76, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nogalska, A.; Zalewska, M. The effect of meat and bone meal on phosphorus concentrations in soil and crop plants. Plant Soil Environ. 2013, 59, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bøen, A.; Haraldsen, T.K. Meat and bone meal and biosolids as slow-release phosphorus fertilizers. Agric. Food Sci. 2013, 22, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cekic, C.; Yilmaz, E. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza and different doses of phosphor on vegetative and generative components of strawberries applied with different phosphor doses in soilless culture. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 4736–4739. [Google Scholar]
  45. Deng, Y.; Feng, G.; Chen, X.; Zou, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization is considerable at optimal Olsen-P levels for maximized yields in an intensive wheat-maize cropping system. Field Crops Res. 2017, 209, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Balzergue, C.; Chabaud, M.; Barker, D.G.; Bécard, G.; Rochange, S.F. High phosphate reduces host ability to develop arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis without affecting root calcium spiking responses to the fungus. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Tullio, M.; Rivera, C.M.; Rea, E. Alleviation of salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhizal in zucchini plants grown at low and high phosphorus concentration. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2008, 44, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oh, W.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, I.-J.; Kim, K.S. Shoot elongation and gibberellin contents in Cyclamen persicum are influenced by temperature and light intensity. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2015, 56, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhiyu, M.; Shimizu, H.; Moriizumi, S.; Miyata, M.; Douzono, M.; Tazawa, S. Effect of light intensity, quality and photoperiod on stem elongation of chrysanthemum cv. Reagan. Environ. Control. Biol. 2007, 45, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Anderson, N.O. Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema × grandiflora Tzvelv.). In Flower Breeding and Genetics; Anderson, N.O., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 389–437. [Google Scholar]
  51. Elhindi, K.M.; Al-Mana, F.A.; El-Hendawy, S.; Al-Selwey, W.A.; Elgorban, A.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigates heavy metal toxicity adverse effects in sewage water contaminated soil on Tagetes erecta L. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 64, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Saini, I.; Aggarwal, A.; Kaushik, P. Inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi and other microbes to improve the morpho-physiological and floral traits of Gazania rigens (L.) Gaertn. Agriculture 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Garmendia, I.; Mangas, V. Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the production of cut flower roses under commercial-like conditions. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Scagel, C.; Schreiner, R.P. Phosphorus supply alters tuber composition, flower production, and mycorrhizal responsiveness of container-grown hybrid Zantedeschia. Plant Soil 2006, 283, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aboul-Nasr, A. Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on Tagetes erecta and Zinnia elegans. Mycorrhiza 1995, 6, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 07 00178 g001 550
Figure 1. The average total shoot length (cm, (a)) and total number of shoots (b) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels (P1, P2 and P3) and without phosphorus (control) in 2015. The vertical bars represent ± SE of the mean value (n = 5).
Figure 1. The average total shoot length (cm, (a)) and total number of shoots (b) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels (P1, P2 and P3) and without phosphorus (control) in 2015. The vertical bars represent ± SE of the mean value (n = 5).
Horticulturae 07 00178 g001
Horticulturae 07 00178 g002 550
Figure 2. The average total shoot length (cm, (a)) and total number of shoots (b) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels (P1, P2 and P3) and without phosphorus (control) in 2016. The vertical bars represent ± SE of the mean value (n = 5).
Figure 2. The average total shoot length (cm, (a)) and total number of shoots (b) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants treated with different phosphorus levels (P1, P2 and P3) and without phosphorus (control) in 2016. The vertical bars represent ± SE of the mean value (n = 5).
Horticulturae 07 00178 g002
Table
Table 1. Fertilization norms according to different fertilization treatments (in mg L−1 substrate).
Table 1. Fertilization norms according to different fertilization treatments (in mg L−1 substrate).
Fertilization TreatmentSuperphosphate FertilizerP2O50-0-60 FertilizerK2OKAN-KutinaCalcium Ammonium Nitrate
Control00201215040.5
P1205.2201215040.5
P24010.4201215040.5
P38020.8201215040.5
Table
Table 2. The average content ± standard error (n = 20) of phosphorus available to plants (mg P2O5 L−1 substrate) regarding phosphorus treatment and time of sampling.
Table 2. The average content ± standard error (n = 20) of phosphorus available to plants (mg P2O5 L−1 substrate) regarding phosphorus treatment and time of sampling.
Main EffectPhosphorus Available to Plants
Phosphorus Treatment
Control1367 ± 126 c
P11630 ± 135 b
P21852 ± 133 a
P31938 ± 130 a
Time
3 July 20151732 ± 114 b
30 September 20152434 ± 93 a
27 July 20161459 ± 67 c
11 October 20161163 ± 79 d
ANOVA
Phosphorus treatment***
Time***
Phosphorus treatment × TimeNS
Means followed by different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences (Duncan test, p < 0.05). ***, statistically significant differences at p < 0.001; NS, not significant.
Table
Table 3. Frequency (F%) and intensity (M%) of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, with frequencies of arbuscules (A%), vesicles (V%), coils (C%) and microsclerotia (MS%) in roots of inoculated Ajania plants in 2015 and 2016. Data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 20).
Table 3. Frequency (F%) and intensity (M%) of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, with frequencies of arbuscules (A%), vesicles (V%), coils (C%) and microsclerotia (MS%) in roots of inoculated Ajania plants in 2015 and 2016. Data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 20).
Main EffectF%M%A%V%C%MS%
Time
2015100 ± 0.022.9 ± 3.1 b0.0 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.0 b0.01 ± 0.0 b0.7 ± 0.2 b
2016100 ± 0.038.1 ± 3.4 a0.1 ± 0.01.0 ± 0.3 a2.7 ± 0.4 a2.9 ± 0.4 a
ANOVA
Phosphorus treatmentNSNSNSNSNSNS
TimeNS**NS*******
Phosphorus treatment × TimeNSNSNSNSNSNS
Means followed by different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences (Duncan test, p < 0.05). *, statistically significant differences at p < 0.05; **, statistically significant differences at p < 0.01; ***, statistically significant differences at p < 0.001; NS, not significant.
Table
Table 4. The average number of inflorescences, number of flowers and days of flowering (± standard error) (n = 20) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants.
Table 4. The average number of inflorescences, number of flowers and days of flowering (± standard error) (n = 20) of inoculated and uninoculated Ajania plants.
Main EffectNumber of InflorescencesNumber of FlowersDays of Flowering
Mycorrhizal inoculum
Inoculated plants1.0 ± 0.2 a29.8 ± 6.5 a26.2 ± 5.4 a
Uninoculated plants0.2 ± 0.1 b6.4 ± 2.4 b8.0 ± 2.8 b
ANOVA
Inoculum******
Phosphorus treatmentNSNSNS
TimeNSNSNS
Inoculum × Phosphorus treatmentNSNSNS
Inoculum × TimeNSNSNS
Phosphorus treatment × TimeNSNSNS
Inoculum × Phosphorus treatment × TimeNSNSNS
Means followed by different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences (Duncan test, p < 0.05). **, statistically significant differences at p < 0.01; NS, not significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vosnjak, M.; Likar, M.; Osterc, G. The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178

AMA Style

Vosnjak M, Likar M, Osterc G. The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(7):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vosnjak, Matej, Matevz Likar, and Gregor Osterc. 2021. "The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant" Horticulturae 7, no. 7: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178

APA Style

Vosnjak, M., Likar, M., & Osterc, G. (2021). The Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculum and Phosphorus Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Ajania (Ajania pacifica (Nakai) Bremer et Humphries) Plant. Horticulturae, 7(7), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop