Next Article in Journal
A Horticultural Medium Established from the Rapid Removal of Phytotoxins from Winery Grape Marc
Next Article in Special Issue
A Susceptible Scion Reduces Rootstock Tolerance to Ralstonia solanacearum in Grafted Eggplant
Previous Article in Journal
Abiotic Stress Effects on Performance of Horticultural Crops
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Propagation and Acclimatization of Dragon Tree (Dracaena draco)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Indolebutyric Acid with Azospirillum brasilense in the Rooting of Herbaceous Blueberry Cuttings

by
Renata Koyama
,
Walter Aparecido Ribeiro Júnior
,
Douglas Mariani Zeffa
,
Ricardo Tadeu Faria
,
Henrique Mitsuharu Saito
,
Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves
and
Sergio Ruffo Roberto
*
Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2019, 5(4), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040068
Submission received: 5 July 2019 / Revised: 30 August 2019 / Accepted: 10 September 2019 / Published: 1 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation in Propagation of Fruit, Vegetable and Ornamental Plants)

Abstract

:
Association between auxins and plant growth-promoting bacteria can stimulate root growth and development of fruit crop nursery plants, and can be a promising biological alternative to increase the rooting of cuttings. The objective of this study was to assess the viability of producing ‘Powderblue’ blueberry nursery plants from cuttings using different doses of indolebutyric acid (IBA) in association with Azospirillum brasilense. The following treatments were tested: 0 (control); 500 mg L−1 of IBA; 1000 mg L−1 of IBA; A. brasilense; 500 mg L−1 of IBA + A. brasilense; and 1000 mg L−1 of IBA + A. brasilense. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four replicates, and each plot (box) consisted of 10 cuttings. The boxes were arranged in a mist chamber with an intermittent regimen controlled by a timer and solenoid valve. After 90 days, the following variables were assessed: rooted cuttings; survival of cuttings; foliar retention; sprouting; cuttings with callus; root dry mass per cutting; number of roots per cutting; and root length. It was observed that the application of IBA with the A. brasilense rhizobacteria increased the number of roots of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings, while the treatments with IBA alone and IBA 1000 mg L−1 + A. brasilense increased the root length of cuttings. However, treatments with IBA and A. brasilense had no impact on % rooted cuttings and % survival of cuttings.

1. Introduction

Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), a fruit species of temperate climates, has high medicinal value owing to its high content of anthocyanins which confer high antioxidant properties to the fruits. These antioxidants help neutralize free radicals related to the onset of degenerative diseases, such as cancer, cataracts, immune disorders, cognitive impairments, and muscle degeneration [1]. The commercial interest in this species has greatly increased because of several studies reporting its efficacy as a medicine [2,3,4]. Consequently, its cultivation is becoming widespread and of interest to producers in Brazil, where it was first grown around 1983 in Pelotas (RS), in studies conducted by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation [5].
Blueberry is mostly asexually propagated through cuttings as adult plants are obtained in a shorter time period compared to those sexually propagated. In addition, this method can be easily executed and lead to the formation of adventitious roots in cuttings in any season of the year [6,7]. However, different blueberry cultivars show distinct responses regarding rooting of cuttings owing to genetic factors that influence cell differentiation and root formation [8,9].
For plant species that are difficult to root, such as blueberry, auxiliary techniques with growth regulators, such as indolebutyric acid (IBA), can be used [10]. Exogenous application of synthetic auxins is very common in vegetative propagation methods using cuttings as they act similar to the natural phytohormone [11]. However, studies have shown that the use of the synthetic hormone IBA in high concentrations can be toxic to the plant or inhibit rooting [12].
The use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) can be a promising biological alternative for increasing the rooting of cuttings [13]. Azospirillum is a genus of PGPRs that inhabits the roots of host plants and provides beneficial effects to the plant under normal growth and/or stress conditions [14]. PGPRs of this genus can increase the fixation of free nitrogen and the production of phytohormones, thus promoting growth in inoculated plants [15].
Studies have shown promising results for association with the PGPR species Azospirillum brasilense; it promotes root development by increasing the production of hormones, leading to growth and development of plants [16,17,18]. In this context, the objective of this study was to assess the viability of producing blueberry nursery plants from cuttings using different doses of IBA in association with A. brasilense.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The experiment was conducted from April to July 2018 at the Department of Horticulture of the Agricultural Research Center of the Londrina State University—PR, Brazil (latitude 23°23′ S, longitude 51°11′ W and elevation of 566 m). Herbaceous cuttings from the median part of shoots of ‘Powderblue’ (Vaccinium sp.) blueberry stock plants were used and maintained in the same department in a greenhouse, originating from a collection of blueberry cultivars belonging to the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

2.2. Experimental Design and Treatments Description

The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four replicates, for a total of 24 experimental units, with each plot comprised of 10 cuttings. The effect of different concentrations of IBA in talc and the association with A. brasilense was assessed. The following treatments were tested: 0 (control); 500 mg L−1 of IBA; 1000 mg L−1 of IBA; A. brasilense; 500 mg L−1 of IBA + A. brasilense; and 1000 mg L−1 of IBA + A. brasilense. The maximum tested dose of IBA (1000 mg L−1) was based on Fischer et al. [19].
Before collecting the cuttings, the IBA solutions were prepared. For this, 0.05 and 0.1 g of concentrated IBA (99.9% purity; Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) were weighed using a semi-analytical balance and dissolved in 50 mL of 100% ethanol. When the IBA was totally dissolved, the volume was adjusted to 100 mL with distilled water, and solutions with concentrations of 500 and 1000 mg L−1 of IBA were obtained. To prepare the IBA in talc, 0.1 g of IBA was mixed in industrial inert talc (Quimidrol®, Joinville, Brazil) for a total of 100 g. For better homogenization, sufficient IBA with ethanol solutions was added to form a paste, and then transferred to an oven at 40 °C, where it remained until complete evaporation of the solvent.
Cuttings were prepared using a bevel cut just below a node, discarding the leaves at the basal part, and keeping two pairs of leaves in the upper part which were later cut in half. During preparation, the cuttings were kept in a container with water to avoid dehydration. After preparing the cuttings, the IBA talc was applied to the base of the cuttings.
Then, the cuttings were placed in perforated plastic boxes (44 × 30 × 7 cm) containing vermiculite substrate of medium granulation for rooting, followed by the application of 1 mL of solution containing A. brasilense (BR 11001t) isolates obtained by Silva et al. [20]. The bacterial isolates were cultured in DYGS medium (glucose 2%, peptone 1.5%, yeast extract 2%, KH2PO4 0.5%, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5%, glutamic acid 1.5%, pH 6.8), the procedure recommended by Kuss [21], with agitation of 120× g at 28 °C, until reaching a population density of 108 CFU mL−1. The cultured bacteria were applied directly into the substrate.

2.3. Growth Conditions

The boxes were arranged in a mist chamber with an intermittent misting regimen controlled by a timer and solenoid valve. The valve was programmed to mist for 10 s every 6 min. The misting nozzle employed (Model DAN-7755 Modular Greenhouse Sprinkler, Tel Aviv, Israel) had a flow rate of 35 L h−1. The mist chamber was placed in a greenhouse with a transparent polyethylene film and 30% cover.
To control fungal diseases, the cuttings were treated weekly with a spray of tebuconazole fungicides (1 mL L−1). Foliar fertilization with Biofert Plus® (Contagem, Brazil) fertilizer (8-9-9 + micronutrients) at a 5 mL L−1 concentration per spray was applied every 15 d.

2.4. Evaluations

After 90 d, the following variables were assessed: rooted cuttings (% of cuttings that developed at least one root); survival of cuttings (% of live cuttings); foliar retention (% of cuttings that did not lose leaves); sprouting (shoot growth); cuttings with callus (% of live cuttings without roots); root dry mass per cutting (g); number of roots per cutting; and root length (cm). The root dry mass was determined by oven drying samples with forced air circulation at 78 °C for 24 h.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Prior to individual analysis of variance, the homoscedasticity and normality of the residues were confirmed using Bartlett [22] (p ≤ 0.05) and Lilliefors [23] tests (p ≤ 0.05), respectively. Arc-sine transformations √(x/100) were performed for variables expressed in percentage and the transformation √(x + 1) was performed for counting data. After performing the individual analysis of variance, those characteristics which had fewer than seven ratios, between the highest and the lowest residuals, were submitted to factorial analysis of variance. Means of significantly affected characteristics were compared by Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

There were no significant differences for % rooted cuttings, survival, foliar retention, cuttings with callus, and root dry mass (Table 1). In contrast to our results, olive-tree cuttings (Olea europaea) treated with 3 g L−1 of IBA in association with A. brasilense led to a higher percentage of rooted cuttings [24]. Therefore, it is likely that the application of IBA and the inoculation with rhizobacteria present different responses depending on the species.
The applications of IBA and the rhizobacterium A. brasilense increased the number of roots per cutting (Table 1 and Table 2). One of the great advantages of increased lateral root production through cuttings is that the volume of soil available to the plant is higher, indirectly increasing the capture of available resources in the soil and increasing the absorption of water and nutrients. These results were also observed with ‘Berkeley’ blueberry from the application of 1000 mg L−1 IBA [25] and with ‘Bluegem’ and ‘Powderblue’ blueberries from the application of 2000 mg L−1 IBA [8].
In addition, it was possible to observe that inoculation of A. brasilense alone was superior to the other treatments in increasing the number of roots per cutting. A. brasilense is known for the ability to alter the architecture of the roots of plants, increasing the formation of lateral and adventitious roots and root hairs. This is because of the production or metabolization by A. brasilense of chemical signaling compounds that alter root elongation and arrangement and the formation of root hairs [26].
However, there were no significant differences between treatments with IBA alone and in association with A. brasilense. Therefore, such an association did not benefit the development of new roots compared to the treatments with IBA alone. Indolacetic acid (IAA) is one of the most important molecules produced by Azospirillum sp. and studies suggest bacterial biosynthesis of IAA can be drastically affected by environmental conditions and exposure to other compounds [16,18]. Thus, the application of IBA may have influenced the production of the rhizobacteria growth-promoting substances.
The mean root length (Table 2) increased with applications of 500 and 1000 mg L−1 of IBA and 1000 mg L−1 of IBA + A. brasilense, and cuttings showed more developed roots compared to that of the control. Genetic factors can influence cell differentiation and root formation in cuttings, and different blueberry cultivars show distinct responses regarding the rooting of cuttings. In studies conducted with ‘Climax’ and ‘Florida’ blueberries, the application of IBA did not increase root length of the roots [27], but ‘Bluegem’, ‘Bluebelle’, and ‘Powderblue’ blueberries responded exponentially to the different concentrations of the growth regulator [8].
Regarding sprouting, emergence of growing buds was more vigorous in the control as compared to treatment with 500 mg L−1 of IBA. Initiation and development of buds are independent of the adventitious formation of roots. The application of high concentrations of auxins in cuttings can inhibit bud growth, sometimes even preventing growth of the aerial part, although root formation may be adequate [11]. Therefore, it was verified that application of A. brasilense alone is a viable alternative to increasing the number of adventitious roots in ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings.

4. Conclusions

The application of IBA with the Azospirillum brasilense rhizobacteria increased the number of roots of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings, while the treatments with IBA alone and IBA 1000 mg L−1 + A. brasilense increased the root length of cuttings. However, treatments with IBA and A. brasilense combined had no impact on % rooted cuttings and % survival of cuttings.

Author Contributions

R.K. and D.M.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. R.K. and H.M.S. performed the experiments. R.K., W.A.R.J., R.T.F., L.S.A.G. and S.R.R. wrote the manuscript. D.M.Z. analyzed the data.

Funding

This study was funded by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Retamales, J.B.; Hancock, J.F. Blueberries, 1st ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2012; pp. 19–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi, M.; Loftus, H.; Mcainch, A.J.; Su, X.Q. Blueberry as a source of bioactive compounds for the treatment of obesity, type 2 diabetes and chronic inflammation. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 30, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yan, Y.; Zhang, F.; Chai, Z.; Liu, M.; Battino, M.; Meng, X. Mixed fermentation of blueberry pomace with L. rhamnosus GG and L. plantarum-1: Enhance the active ingredient, antioxidant activity and health-promoting benefits. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 131, 110541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Fong, S.K.; Singh, A.P.; Vorsa, N.; Cicalese, N.J. Variation of anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, flavonols, and organic acids in cultivated and wild diploid blueberry species. HortScience 2019, 54, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Antunes, L.E.C.; Raseira, M.C.B. Cultivo do mirtilo (Vaccinium spp.), 1st ed.; EMBRAPA: Pelotas, Brazil, 2006; pp. 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shahab, M.; Roberto, S.R.R.; Colombo, R.C.; Silvestre, J.P.; Ahmed, S.; Koyama, R.; Hussain, I. Clonal propagation of blueberries minicuttings under subtropical conditions. Int. J. Biosci. 2018, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Porfírio, S.; Silva, M.D.R.; Cabrita, M.J.; Azadi, P.; Peixe, A. Reviewing current knowledge on olive (Olea europaea L.) adventitious root formation. Sci. Hort. 2016, 198, 207–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marangon, M.A.; Biasi, L.A. Cutting propagation of blueberry in seasons of the year with indolebutyric acid and bottom heat. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2013, 48, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pio, R.; Costa, F.C.; Curi, P.N.; Moura, P.H.A. Rooting of kiwi cultivars woody cuttings. Sci. Agric. 2010, 11, 271–274. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/html/995/99515056012/ (accessed on 24 June 2019).
  10. Vignolo, G.K.; Fischer, D.L.O.; Araujo, V.F.; Kunde, R.J.; Antunes, L.E.C. Rooting of hardwood cuttings of three blueberry cultivars with different concentrations of IBA. Cienc. Rural 2012, 42, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hartmann, H.T.; Kester, D.E.; Davies, F.T.; Geneve, R.L. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, 8th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 295–360. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sauer, M.; Robert, S.; Kleine-Vehn, J. Auxin: Simply complicated. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2565–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mariosa, T.N.; Melloni, E.G.P.; Melloni, R.; Ferreira, G.M.R.; Souza, S.M.P.; Silva, L.F.O. Rhizobacteria and development of seedlings from semi-hardwood cuttings of olive (Olea europaea L.). Rev. Cienc. Agrar. 2017, 60, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khademian, R.; Asghari, B.; Sedaghati, B.; Yaghoubian, Y. Plant beneficial rhizospheric microorganisms (PBRMs) mitigate deleterious effects of salinity in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Physio-biochemical properties, fatty acids composition and secondary metabolites content. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2019, 136, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cassán, F.; Diaz-Zorita, M. Azospirillum sp. in current agriculture: From the laboratory to the field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Molina, R.; Rivera, D.; Mora, V.; López, G.; Rosas, S.; Spaepen, S.; Vanderleyden, J.; Cassán, F. Regulation of IAA biosynthesis in Azospirillum brasilense under environmental stress conditions. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 1408–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rivera, D.; Mora, V.; Lopez, G.; Rosas, S.; Spaepen, S.; Vanderleyden, J.; Cassan, F. New insights into indole-3-acetic acid metabolism in Azospirillum brasilense. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 1774–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fukami, J.; Ollero, F.J.; de la Osa, C.; Valderrama-Fernández, R.; Nogueira, M.A.; Megías, M.; Hungria, M. Antioxidant activity and induction of mechanisms of resistance to stresses related to the inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 1191–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fischer, D.L.O.; Fachinello, J.C.; Antunes, L.E.C.; Tomaz, Z.F.P.; Giacobbo, C.L. Efeito do ácido indolbutírico e da cultivar no enraizamento de estacas lenhosas de mirtilo. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2008, 30, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Silva, T.F.; Melloni, R. Density and phenotypic diversity of non-symbiotic diazotrophic bacteria in soils of the Biological Reserve Serra dos Toledos, Itajubá (MG). Rev. Bras. Ciênc. 2011, 35, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuss, A.V.; Kuss, V.V.; Lovato, T.; Flores, M.L. Nitrogen fixation and in vitro production of indolacetic acid by endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2007, 42, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bartlett, M.S. Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. J. Math. Phys. Sci. 1937, 160, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lilliefors, H.W. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality. Biometrika 1967, 62, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rosa, D.D.; Villa, F.; Silva, D.F.; Corbari, F. Rooting of semihardwood cuttings of olive: Indolbutyric acid, calcium and Azospirillum brasilense. Comun. Sci. 2018, 9, 34–40. Available online: https://www.comunicatascientiae.com.br/comunicata/article/view/977/528 (accessed on 24 June 2019). [CrossRef]
  25. Çelik, H. The performance of some northern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) varieties in north eastern part of Anatolia. Anadolu Tarım Bilim. Derg. 2009, 24, 141–146. Available online: http://www3.omu.edu.tr/anajas/pdf/24(3)/141-146.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2019).
  26. Gouda, S.; Kerry, R.J.; Samal, D.; Mahapatra, G.P.; Das, G.; Patra, J.K. Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agriculture. In Advances in Microbial Biotechnology, 1st ed.; Kumar, P., Patra, J.K., Chandra, J., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  27. Peña, M.L.P.; Gubert, C.; Tagliani, M.C.; Bueno, P.M.C.; Biasi, L.A. Concentrations and forms of application of indolebutyric acid on cutting propagation of cvs. Florida and Climax blueberries. Semina 2012, 33, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Rooted cuttings (RC), survival (SV), foliar retention (FR), leaf retention (LR), sprouting (S), cuttings with callus (CC), root dry mass (DM), number of roots (NR), and root length (RL) of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings exposed to indolebutyric acid and Azospirillum brasilense.
Table 1. Rooted cuttings (RC), survival (SV), foliar retention (FR), leaf retention (LR), sprouting (S), cuttings with callus (CC), root dry mass (DM), number of roots (NR), and root length (RL) of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings exposed to indolebutyric acid and Azospirillum brasilense.
Sources of VariationRC (%)SV (%)FR (%)S (%)CC (%)DM (g)NRRL (cm)
TMS z0.1 ns y0.3 ns0.4 ns0.8 *0.4 ns5.5 ns27.3 *66.5 *
EMS0.30.20.40.20.34.18.511.4
Mean x45.489.242.073.337.10.63.94.5
CV (%)16.78.812.312.220.833.815.026.6
z TMS = Treatment mean square. EMS = Error mean square. y * = significant p ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA. ns: not significant. x Mean across treatments. CV (%) = Coefficient of variation.
Table 2. Number of roots (NR), root length (RL), and sprouting (S) of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings treated with indolebutyric acid (IBA) and Azospirillum brasilense (Azo).
Table 2. Number of roots (NR), root length (RL), and sprouting (S) of ‘Powderblue’ blueberry cuttings treated with indolebutyric acid (IBA) and Azospirillum brasilense (Azo).
TreatmentsNR 1/RL (cm) 1/S (%) 1/
Control2.79 c2.81 b92.5 a
500 mg L−1 IBA4.02 b5.62 a85.0 a
1000 mg L−1 IBA3.50 b5.18 a60.0 b
Azo5.57 a3.88 ab70.0 b
Azo + 500 mg L−1 IBA4.38 b4.28 ab75.0 b
Azo + 1000 mg L−1 IBA3.38 b5.00 a57.5 c
1/ Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by the Tukey’s test set at 5% probability.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koyama, R.; Aparecido Ribeiro Júnior, W.; Mariani Zeffa, D.; Tadeu Faria, R.; Mitsuharu Saito, H.; Simões Azeredo Gonçalves, L.; Ruffo Roberto, S. Association of Indolebutyric Acid with Azospirillum brasilense in the Rooting of Herbaceous Blueberry Cuttings. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040068

AMA Style

Koyama R, Aparecido Ribeiro Júnior W, Mariani Zeffa D, Tadeu Faria R, Mitsuharu Saito H, Simões Azeredo Gonçalves L, Ruffo Roberto S. Association of Indolebutyric Acid with Azospirillum brasilense in the Rooting of Herbaceous Blueberry Cuttings. Horticulturae. 2019; 5(4):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koyama, Renata, Walter Aparecido Ribeiro Júnior, Douglas Mariani Zeffa, Ricardo Tadeu Faria, Henrique Mitsuharu Saito, Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves, and Sergio Ruffo Roberto. 2019. "Association of Indolebutyric Acid with Azospirillum brasilense in the Rooting of Herbaceous Blueberry Cuttings" Horticulturae 5, no. 4: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040068

APA Style

Koyama, R., Aparecido Ribeiro Júnior, W., Mariani Zeffa, D., Tadeu Faria, R., Mitsuharu Saito, H., Simões Azeredo Gonçalves, L., & Ruffo Roberto, S. (2019). Association of Indolebutyric Acid with Azospirillum brasilense in the Rooting of Herbaceous Blueberry Cuttings. Horticulturae, 5(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop