Optimization of Juncao Substrate Formulation for Flammulina filiformis Cultivation: An Enzymatic and Transcriptomic Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Tested Strain and Materials
2.2. Mixture Design for F. filiformis YH2303
2.3. Cultivation Experiments
2.4. Validation Experiment via Regression Analysis
2.5. Nutritional Composition Analysis
2.6. Economic Benefit Assessment
2.7. Determination of Extracellular Enzyme Activity in Cultivation Substrate
2.8. Transcriptomic Analysis
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Results of the Mixture Design Experiment
3.2. Regression Model Establishment, Validation and Effect Analysis
3.2.1. Regression Model Establishment and Statistical Analysis
3.2.2. Main and Interaction Effects Analysis
3.3. Formulation Optimization and Cultivation Validation
3.4. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Heavy Metal Content in F. filiformis
3.5. Economic Benefit Analysis
3.6. Changes in Enzyme Activity of F. filiformis at Different Developmental Stages
3.7. Correlation Analysis Among Yield, Mycelial Growth Rate, and Enzyme Activities of F. filiformis at Different Stages
3.8. Effects of Grass-Based Cultivation on F. filiformis Fruiting Bodies Revealed by Transcriptomic Analysis
3.8.1. Evaluation of Total RNA Quality, Sequencing Data Yield, and Quality
3.8.2. Screening Results of DEGs
3.8.3. GO and KEGG Enrichment Analysis of DEGs
3.8.4. Validation of DEGs by RT-qPCR
4. Discussion
4.1. Optimization of C. fungigraminus-Based Substrate via Mixture Design and Its Effects on the Nutritional Composition of F. filiformis
4.2. Dynamic Effects of C. fungigraminus Substrate on Extracellular Enzyme Activities in F. filiformis
4.3. Transcriptomic Mechanisms of F. filiformis Response to C. fungigraminus-Based Substrate
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CK | Control formulation |
| DNS | 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic Acid |
| CMC | Carboxymethylcellulose |
| FPase | Filter Paper Enzyme |
| ABTS | 2,2′-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) |
| ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
| DEGs | Differentially Expressed Genes |
| GO | Gene Ontology |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| RNA | Ribonucleic Acid |
| mRNA | Messenger RNA |
| RT-qPCR | Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| RNA-Seq | Ribonucleic Acid Sequencing |
| TCA | Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle |
| CNY USD OD RIN SRA | Chinese Yuan United States Dollar Optical Density RNA Integrity Number Sequence Read Archive |
Appendix A
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 2.44 | 6 | 0.41 | 30.52 | <0.0001 |
| Linear Mixture | 1.82 | 2 | 0.91 | 68.42 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 0.033 | 1 | 0.033 | 2.49 | 0.1383 |
| AC | 0.028 | 1 | 0.028 | 2.10 | 0.1710 |
| BC | 0.18 | 1 | 0.18 | 13.73 | 0.0026 |
| ABC | 0.22 | 1 | 0.22 | 16.9 | 0.0012 |
| Residual | 0.17 | 13 | 0.013 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.16 | 3 | 0.053 | 40.88 | <0.001 |
| Pure Error | 0.0013 | ||||
| Cor Total | 2.61 | 19 |
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 6709.28 | 6 | 1118.21 | 33.35 | <0.0001 |
| Linear Mixture | 3797.42 | 2 | 1898.71 | 56.64 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 23.15 | 1 | 23.15 | 0.69 | 0.4209 |
| AC | 988.14 | 1 | 988.14 | 29.47 | 0.0001 |
| BC | 1124.43 | 1 | 1124.43 | 33.54 | <0.0001 |
| ABC | 2236.38 | 1 | 2236.38 | 66.71 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 435.82 | 13 | 33.52 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 229.48 | 3 | 76.49 | 3.71 | 0.0500 |
| Pure Error | 206.34 | 10 | 20.63 | ||
| Cor Total | 7145.10 | 19 |
| Type | Trinity | Unigene |
|---|---|---|
| N50 | 1877 | 1408 |
| N90 | 417 | 304 |
| Average length | 1083.69 | 799.71 |
| Max length | 11990 | 11990 |
| Min length | 201 | 201 |
| Total base | 61415339 | 29757320 |
| Total contigs | 56683 | 37210 |
| GC_content | 50.64 | 50.62 |
| GC_content_max | 83.6 | 83.6 |
| GC_content_min | 9.05 | 9.05 |


References
- Wang, P.M.; Liu, X.B.; Dai, Y.C.; Horak, E.; Steffen, K.; Yang, Z.L. Phylogeny and Species Delimitation of Flammulina: Taxonomic Status of Winter Mushroom in East Asia and a New European Species Identified Using an Integrated Approach. Mycol. Progress 2018, 17, 1013–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, L.; Ma, Z.; Qiu, H.; Liu, X.; Wu, T.; Ge, F.; Liu, R.; Zhu, J.; Shi, L.; Jiang, A.; et al. Chitosan Increases Lysine Content through Amino Acid Transporters in Flammulina filiformis. Foods 2022, 11, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chumroenphat, T.; Phuseerit, O. Comparative Study on Amino Acids, Polyphenols and Biological Activity of Coprinopsis radiata (a Mushroom) with Different Protein Extraction Methods. In Vegetos; 2025; prepublish. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Liu, S.; Du, L.; Ma, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; He, C.; Guan, L. Ultrasonic Assisted Three-Phase Partitioning Extraction and Bioactivities Validation of Polysaccharides from Flammulina velutipes Residues. Food Chem. X 2025, 31, 103177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Hao, X.; Wang, J.; Ma, C.; Xi, X.; Kang, W. The Effect of Flammulina velutipes Polysaccharide on Immunization Analyzed by Intestinal Flora and Proteomics. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 841230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.; Hoo, P.C.-X.; Tan, L.T.-H.; Pusparajah, P.; Khan, T.M.; Lee, L.-H.; Goh, B.-H.; Chan, K.-G. Golden Needle Mushroom: A Culinary Medicine with Evidenced-Based Biological Activities and Health Promoting Properties. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Shao, Y.; Chen, H.; Gong, M.; Wang, L.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Zou, G. The Exploration of Cordyceps Militaris Extract as a Postharvest Preservative for Flammulina filiformis. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, W.; Wang, H.; Feng, T.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J. Structural Characterization of Polysaccharide from Flammulina velutipes and Its Impact on Hyperlipidemia through Modulation of Hepatic Cholesterol Metabolism and Gut Microbiota. Foods 2025, 14, 3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Han, J.; Xie, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, F.; Gong, Z.; Zou, Y. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Flammulina filiformis Reveals Substrate-Specific Enzymatic Strategies for Lignocellulose Degradation. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Ge, N. Feasibility Study on Reed Rods Applied in High-Yield Formula of Flammulina filiformis Factory Cultivation. J. Fungal Res. 2023, 21, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, D.; Lin, X.; Zheng, Y.; Zeng, L.; Huang, M.; Chen, G.; Yao, Q. Determination of 11 Plant Growth Regulators in Cottonseed Hulls by HPLC-MS/MS. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2025, 27, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Han, J.; Yang, P.; Yang, S.; Xie, H.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Yao, Q.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; et al. Formula Screening and Optimization of Physical and Chemical Properties for Cultivating Flammulina Filiformis Using Soybean Straw as Substrate. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.-R.; Liu, S.-R.; Su, G.-P.; Ma, L.-Y. Camellia oleifera Seed Shell: An Effective Substrate for Producing Flammulina velutipes Fruit Bodies with Improved Nutritional Value. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2019, 21, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Lin, X.; Lin, H.; Lin, D.; Yang, F.; Lin, Z. Advances on Juncao research and application. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 49, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claude, I.; Aimable, N.; Mediatrice, H.; Zhou, H.; Lin, D.; Liu, P.; Lin, Z. Evaluation of the Influence of Varied Juncao Grass Substrates on Physiological and Enzymatic Reactions of Pleurotus ostreatus. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 9493–9502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, Y.; Jiang, F.; Di, X.; Lin, D.; Ling, P.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lin, Z.; Li, J. Cultivating Dictyophora indusiata with Cenchrus fungigraminus and Seafood Mushroom Spent Substrate Enhanced Soil Nutrient Accumulation and Microbial Community Stabilisation. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 38, 104200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Lu, Z.; Sossah, F.L.; Xu, L.; Cheng, H.; Li, Q.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y. Optimization of Agro-Residue Substrates for Sustainable Cultivation of Pleurotus giganteus in Hainan, China. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zervakis, G.I.; Koutrotsios, G.; Katsaris, P. Composted versus Raw Olive Mill Waste as Substrates for the Production of Medicinal Mushrooms: An Assessment of Selected Cultivation and Quality Parameters. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 546830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamarudin, N.B.; Sharma, S.; Gupta, A.; Kee, C.G.; Chik, S.M.S.B.T.; Gupta, R. Statistical Investigation of Extraction Parameters of Keratin from Chicken Feather Using Design-Expert. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 15672; Determination of Total Sugar Content in Edible Fungi. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China: Shanghai, China, 2009.
- Yue, F.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; Niu, T.; Lü, X.; Liu, M. Effects of Monosaccharide Composition on Quantitative Analysis of Total Sugar Content by Phenol-Sulfuric Acid Method. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 963318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 5009.5; Determination of Protein in Food. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Food and Drug Administration: Beijing, China, 2016.
- Rexroad, P.R.; Cathey, R.D. Pollution-Reduced Kjeldahl Method for Crude Protein. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1976, 59, 1213–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 5009.10; Determination of Crude Fiber in Plant-Based Foods. Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2003.
- Flodman, H.R.; Boyer, E.J.; Muthukumarappan, A.; Noureddini, H. Extraction of Soluble Fiber from Distillers’ Grains. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 1070–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 5009.6; Determination of Fat in Food. China Food and Drug Administration. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
- Gao, S.; Qian, Z.; He, Z.; Zhou, W.; Xu, H. Analysis of Nutrients in Apriona Germari and Treatment of Diarrhea in Mice Fed with Insect Powder. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2023, 33, 101368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 5009.268; Determination of Multiple Elements in Food. State Administration for Market Regulation. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
- Kosanić, M.; Ranković, B.; Rančić, A.; Stanojković, T. Evaluation of Metal Contents and Bioactivity of Two Edible Mushrooms Agaricus campestris and Boletus edulis. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2017, 29, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, C.; Li, M.; Hu, Y. High-Activity Production of Xylanase by Pichia stipitis: Purification, Characterization, Kinetic Evaluation and Xylooligosaccharides Production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; You, S.; Zhang, J.; Qi, W.; Su, R.; He, Z. An Effective In-Situ Method for Laccase Immobilization: Excellent Activity, Effective Antibiotic Removal Rate and Low Potential Ecological Risk for Degradation Products. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 308, 123271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Mao, X.; Cai, T.; Luo, J.; Wei, L. KOBAS Server: A Web-Based Platform for Automated Annotation and Pathway Identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W720–W724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- GB 2762; Limits of Contaminants in Food. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation: Beijing, China, 2022.
- Muteki, K.; MacGregor, J.F.; Ueda, T. Mixture Designs and Models for the Simultaneous Selection of Ingredients and Their Ratios. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2007, 86, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harimurti, S.; Amalia, P.N.; Sukamdi, D.P.; Widada, H.; Nurul Makiyah, S.N.; Kesetyaningsih, T.W.; Ghozali, M.T.; Susanti, H. Optimization of Sago Starch and Sodium Alginate Crosslink, Including Calcium Chloride as a Capsule Alternative Using the Simplex Lattice Design. Pharmacia 2025, 72, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setyawan, E.I.; Rohman, A.; Setyowati, E.P.; Nugroho, A.K. The Combination of Simplex Lattice Design and Chemometrics in the Formulation of Green Tea Leaves as Transdermal Matrix Patch. Pharmacia 2021, 68, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petraglia, T.; Latronico, T.; Liuzzi, G.M.; Fanigliulo, A.; Crescenzi, A.; Rossano, R. Hydrolytic Enzymes in the Secretome of the Mushrooms, P. eryngii and P. ostreatus: A Comparison between the Two Species. Molecules 2025, 30, 2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Xiao, T.; Juan, J.; Qian, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Shen, X.; Huang, J. Lignocellulose Degradation Efficiency of Agaricus bisporus Strains Grown on Wheat Straw-Based Compost. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 10607–10615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, M.; Sun, X.; Yao, F.; Lu, L.; Ma, X.; Shao, K.; Kaimoyo, E. A Combination of Transcriptome and Enzyme Activity Analysis Unveils Key Genes and Patterns of Corncob Lignocellulose Degradation by Auricularia heimuer under Cultivation Conditions. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Ma, P.; Li, C.; Xiao, L.; Liang, Z.; Dong, J. Combining Transcriptomics and Metabolomics to Reveal the Underlying Molecular Mechanism of Ergosterol Biosynthesis during the Fruiting Process of Flammulina velutipes. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y.; Feng, K.; Chen, B. A Review of Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Applications in Edible Fungi Biology: Current Status and Future Directions. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Formulation | A | B | C | Supplementary Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 52 |
| 2 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 52 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 52 |
| 4 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 52 |
| 5 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 52 |
| 6 | 0 | 24 | 24 | 52 |
| 7 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 52 |
| 8 | 8 | 8 | 32 | 52 |
| 9 | 8 | 32 | 8 | 52 |
| 10 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 52 |
| CK | 0 | 0 | 40 | 52 |
| Unigene ID | Primer-F | Primer-R |
|---|---|---|
| RPL19C | AACGGGCCATTACATCGGTAC | AGTACATCCACAAGGCCAAG |
| DN18814_c0_g1_11 | GAGGCGTATGTCCAGAATGTTG | TAACCGACTCAGCAGCAGAC |
| DN17334_c0_g4 | GCTCCTTCTATCGGCAACTTG | CACTCTTCACGCACTCCTTG |
| DN529_c0_g1 | CCGTACCTGGAGGCATATCA | GCGACTGATGTCATCCTTGTG |
| DN16418_c0_g1 | CTGTGCGGAAGAGGAGGTTT | CAGTGATGCGGCTAACATTGTC |
| DN16495_c0_g2 | GTGCGTAGCCAGGAAGGATA | TGAACTGTCGTGGTGTGAGA |
| DN10817_c0_g1 | AGGATCTTACTTCGCTCTAATGGA | GAACTCGCTGACAGGAATGG |
| DN26068_c0_g1 | CGGAATGAGCGGTGGTATTG | CTGTGTAATGGCGATGGTCTTC |
| Formulation | C. fungigraminus/% | A. donax cv. Lvzhou No. 1/% | Corn Cob/% | Mycelial Growth Rate (mm/d) | Yield (Measured)/g | Yield (Predicted)/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2.32 ± 0.24 d | 101.87 ± 0.67 cd | 99.57 |
| 2 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 2.19 ± 0.32 e | 80.90 ± 7.41 ef | 74.64 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 3.04 ± 0.04 a | 110.80 ± 0.68 bc | 114.77 |
| 4 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 2.10 ± 0.05 f | 94.97 ± 4.59 d | 91.25 |
| 5 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 2.49 ± 0.03 c | 130.97 ± 0.99 a | 134.21 |
| 6 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 2.94 ± 0.03 b | 120.17 ± 0.47 ab | 123.55 |
| 7 | 66.7 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 2.20 ± 0.04 e | 96.77 ± 2.69 d | 95.14 |
| 8 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 66.7 | 2.21 ± 0.05 e | 90.40 ± 2.34 de | 83.28 |
| 9 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 2.89 ± 0.02 b | 117.40 ± 0.51 b | 110.98 |
| 10 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 2.03 ± 0.06 f | 74.77 ± 11.92 f | 83.27 |
| Parameter | Mycelial Growth Rate | Yield | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of Variance | F-Value | p-Value | F-Value | p-Value |
| Model | 3.52 | <0.0001 | 33.35 | <0.0001 |
| Linear Mixture | 68.42 | <0.0001 | 56.64 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 2.49 | 0.1383 | 0.69 | 0.4209 |
| AC | 2.10 | 0.1710 | 29.47 | 0.0001 |
| BC | 13.73 | 0.0026 | 33.54 | <0.0001 |
| ABC | 16.90 | 0.0012 | 66.71 | <0.0001 |
| Lack of Fit | 40.88 | <0.001 | 3.71 | 0.0500 |
| R2 | 0.9337 | 0.9390 | ||
| R2Adj | 0.9031 | 0.9109 | ||
| Formulation | Mycelial Growth Rate (mm/d) | Full Colonization Time (d) | Inoculation to Maturity Stage (d) | Biological Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.32 ± 0.24 e | 56.10 ± 0.59 c | 73.10 ± 0.49 bc | 75.23 ± 2.45 |
| 2 | 2.19 ± 0.32 ef | 59.33 ± 0.88 bc | 76.53 ± 0.87 a | 50.65 ± 12.95 |
| 3 | 3.04 ± 0.04 a | 42.77 ± 0.62 f | 61.97 ± 0.58 e | 113.05 ± 4.11 c |
| 4 | 2.10 ± 0.03 fg | 61.97 ± 0.84 ab | 77.40 ± 0.71 a | 65.00 ± 7.22 |
| 5 | 2.49 ± 0.02 d | 52.20 ± 0.42 d | 71.40 ± 0.42 c | 101.4 ± 5.11 d |
| 6 | 2.94 ± 0.01 ab | 44.17 ± 0.22 ef | 61.30 ± 0.51 e | 94.43 ± 3.15 e |
| 7 | 2.20 ± 0.02 ef | 59.10 ± 0.67 bc | 75.40 ± 0.71 ab | 68.59 ± 10.4 |
| 8 | 2.21 ± 0.03 ef | 58.97 ± 0.82 bc | 76.07 ± 0.56 a | 62.34 ± 2.34 |
| 9 | 2.89 ± 0.01 b | 44.97 ± 0.20 ef | 62.87 ± 0.47 de | 98.74 ± 0.97 d |
| 10 | 2.03 ± 0.04 g | 64.00 ± 1.15 a | 78.20 ± 0.59 a | 54.38 ± 10.53 |
| CK | 2.94 ± 0.02 ab | 44.27 ± 0.64 ef | 62.33 ± 0.84 de | 115.27 ± 2.46 b |
| Y | 2.75 ± 0.01 c | 47.23 ± 0.32 e | 65.03 ± 0.35 d | 131.96 ± 2.77 a |
| Formulation | Total Sugar (g/100 g) | Crude Protein (g/100 g) | Crude Fiber (g/100 g) | Crude Lipid (g/100 g) | Pb (mg/kg) | Cd (mg/kg) | As (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 37.64 ± 0.90 * | 19.63 | 15.75 | 1.08 | — | 0.085 | 0.064 |
| Y | 34.42 ± 0.65 * | 20.01 | 18.05 | 1.16 | — | 0.021 | 0.047 |
| Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods | ≤0.5 | ≤0.2 | ≤0.5 |
| Sample | Concentration (ng/µL) | 28S/18S | RIN | OD260/280 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 92.50 | 1.73 | 7.3 | 2.06 |
| CK2 | 79.35 | 1.58 | 6.7 | 2.10 |
| CK3 | 88.91 | 1.86 | 7.7 | 2.11 |
| Y1 | 78.75 | 1.77 | 8.7 | 2.11 |
| Y2 | 69.15 | 1.74 | 7.8 | 2.11 |
| Y3 | 87.18 | 1.59 | 8.6 | 2.14 |
| Sample | Raw Reads | Raw Bases (G) | Clean Reads | Clean Bases (G) | Q20 (%) | Q30 (%) | Clean GC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 46,545,366 | 6.98 | 45,863,472 | 6.74 | 99.51 | 98.04 | 52.46 |
| CK2 | 47,413,840 | 7.11 | 46,748,772 | 6.89 | 99.55 | 98.16 | 52.59 |
| CK3 | 47,997,830 | 7.20 | 47,335,972 | 6.97 | 99.55 | 98.17 | 52.55 |
| Y1 | 48,629,982 | 7.29 | 47,960,972 | 7.08 | 99.54 | 98.12 | 52.58 |
| Y2 | 48,537,216 | 7.28 | 47,846,906 | 7.05 | 99.55 | 98.14 | 52.61 |
| Y3 | 43,935,594 | 6.59 | 43,395,982 | 6.41 | 99.56 | 98.16 | 52.58 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Huang, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Lai, J.; Ukii, B.M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Lin, Z.; Lin, D. Optimization of Juncao Substrate Formulation for Flammulina filiformis Cultivation: An Enzymatic and Transcriptomic Study. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040420
Huang W, Wang J, Chen H, Lai J, Ukii BM, Zhang L, Wang Y, Luo Y, Lin Z, Lin D. Optimization of Juncao Substrate Formulation for Flammulina filiformis Cultivation: An Enzymatic and Transcriptomic Study. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(4):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040420
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Weizhen, Jiayan Wang, Haitao Chen, Jiali Lai, Ben Menda Ukii, Lin Zhang, Yaojin Wang, Yuan Luo, Zhanxi Lin, and Dongmei Lin. 2026. "Optimization of Juncao Substrate Formulation for Flammulina filiformis Cultivation: An Enzymatic and Transcriptomic Study" Horticulturae 12, no. 4: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040420
APA StyleHuang, W., Wang, J., Chen, H., Lai, J., Ukii, B. M., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Luo, Y., Lin, Z., & Lin, D. (2026). Optimization of Juncao Substrate Formulation for Flammulina filiformis Cultivation: An Enzymatic and Transcriptomic Study. Horticulturae, 12(4), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040420
