Next Article in Journal
Plant Ornithine Decarboxylase: A Key Regulator of Polyamine Biosynthesis and Its Roles in Growth, Stress Response, and Secondary Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of LBD Transcription Factors Revealed the Essential Role of ClLBD2 in Root Development in Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Analysis of Grapevine Ascorbate Oxidase Genes Identifies VaAAO7 in Vitis amurensis as a Positive Regulator of Botrytis cinerea Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Capacity and Expression of Potassium and Sugar Transporters in Peach (Prunus persica)

1
Laboratory of Fruit Tree Biotechnology, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Zhenjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhenjiang 310021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2026, 12(3), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030388
Submission received: 13 February 2026 / Revised: 17 March 2026 / Accepted: 17 March 2026 / Published: 21 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection New Insights into Developmental Biology of Fruit Trees)

Abstract

Potassium (K+) is a vital macronutrient for plant growth and stress resilience, with KT/HAK/KUP transporters playing a central role in its homeostasis. Although these transporters are known to influence photosynthesis, the molecular mechanisms by which fertilization promotes assimilate accumulation in peach crops remain poorly understood. In this study, 17 PpHAK genes were identified based on the peach genome and classified into four distinct clades through phylogenetic analysis, a classification further supported by conserved gene structures and motifs. Interspecific collinearity analysis revealed that transporters are highly conserved among Rosaceae species. Physiological measurements demonstrated that foliar application significantly enhanced photosynthetic capacity, as evidenced by a 33% increase in net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and improved photoelectron yield (Y(II)). At the same time, the transcript levels of the transporters PpHAK1, PpHAK5, and PpHAK9 were significantly upregulated, as confirmed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. Furthermore, the expression of genes involved in sugar metabolism and transport, particularly PpPLT5-1, was significantly induced. Collectively, these results indicate that foliar K+ application enhances photosynthesis and promotes assimilate accumulation by modulating the expression of both K+ and sugar transporters. These findings offer a theoretical basis for optimizing nutrient management to improve fruit quality in stone fruit production.

1. Introduction

Potassium (K+) is an essential macronutrient that plays a critical role in plant growth and development [1]. It participates in several vital physiological processes, including enzyme activation, osmotic adjustment, stomatal regulation, photosynthesis, and the source-to-sink transport of carbohydrates [2]. Moreover, potassium enhances plant tolerance to environmental stresses such as cold, drought, and salinity. In agricultural production, the application of potassium fertilizer is an effective strategy to boost crop yield and, to a certain extent, improve fruit quality [3]. In plants, potassium transporters are classified into four major multigene families: KT/HAK/KUP (K+ transporter/high-affinity K+/K+ uptake), Trk/HKT (K+ transporter/high-affinity K+ transporter), KEA (K+ efflux antiporter), and CHX (cation/hydrogen exchanger) [4]. Among these, the HAK/KUP/KT family represents the largest group of potassium transporters and is categorized into four phylogenetic groups, designated as Clusters I, II, III, and IV. Plants possess a diverse array of HAK/KUP/KT transporters, which perform multifaceted functions in potassium uptake and translocation, plant growth and development, salt tolerance, and the regulation of osmotic potential [5].
Potassium transporters play a pivotal role in the uptake and distribution of potassium (K+) in plants. Studies have shown that the expression and activity of these transporters directly affect K+ use efficiency and plant tolerance to environmental stresses [6]. Plant high-affinity HAK1 transporters share high sequence similarity with fungal HAK1 transporters. Functional expression assays in yeast mutants have demonstrated that HvHAK1, AtHAK5, and OsHAK1 mediate high-affinity K+ uptake [7,8,9]. In barley, HvHAK1 has been reported to enhance drought tolerance by regulating signal transduction pathways in leaves [10]. Similarly, in rice, overexpression of OsHAK1 improves drought tolerance by boosting antioxidant capacity and promoting proline accumulation. Furthermore, overexpression of OsHAK5 in rice increases the K+/Na+ ratio in shoots and facilitates K+ transport, thereby conferring salt tolerance [11]. Compared with K-sufficient plants, K deficiency results in increased water potential in old leaves and decreased turgor pressure (pressure potential) in young leaves. Consequently, the cell volume of young leaves under low-K conditions is significantly smaller than that under K-sufficient conditions [12]. Furthermore, elevated expression of potassium transporters has been shown to enhance the uptake of exogenous auxin in tobacco, thereby promoting root growth [13]. For instance, in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), overexpression of the potassium transporter HAK1 significantly enhances resistance to Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV), suggesting that improved K+ nutrition may bolster disease resistance by restricting viral spread. In strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), the FaTPK1 gene is not only involved in fruit ripening but also modulates the contents of soluble sugars, anthocyanins, and abscisic acid (ABA), thereby influencing fruit flavor and nutritional value [14]. Similarly, during the postharvest ripening of kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.), the expression of AcKUP2 mirrors the trend of potassium accumulation and is inducible by ethylene, indicating a potential role in ethylene-mediated ripening and the formation of fruit flavor quality [15].
In addition to genetic regulation, potassium fertilization is critical for plant growth and fruit development. In pear (Pyrus spp.), K+ supply levels significantly alter the expression of genes related to sugar metabolism and sugar accumulation [16]. Low-K treatment inhibits sucrose and acid metabolism pathways while upregulating genes involved in sorbitol metabolism, promoting fructose accumulation. Conversely, high-K treatment enhances leaf photosynthetic capacity and optimizes the source-to-sink allocation of nutrients and carbohydrates, increasing fruit sugar content. In grape (Vitis vinifera), K accumulation is closely correlated with sugar accumulation. Increased K fertilization promotes sugar accumulation by modulating the activities of sugar-metabolizing enzymes and their gene transcript levels [17]. Specifically, K treatment increases total soluble solids (TSS) and sugar content while decreasing titratable acidity during late fruit development. In citrus, adequate K supply stimulates sugar accumulation and improves fruit quality by regulating carbon translocation from source leaves to fruits [15]. Collectively, these findings suggest that potassium transporters, by facilitating K transport, play a fundamental role in promoting fruit sugar accumulation through the regulation of sugar metabolic pathways and nutrient allocation.
Currently, the HAK/KUP/KT gene family has been extensively reported in various plant species [18]. Members of this family are widely expressed in diverse tissues such as roots, stems, leaves, and fruits, enabling plants to efficiently uptake potassium under low-K environments, maintain cellular ion homeostasis and osmotic balance, and regulate stress responses and metabolic processes. However, the relationship between the evolutionary trajectory and functional characteristics of the HAK gene family remains largely elusive [19], and research in stone fruits, particularly peach (Prunus persica), is notably lacking.
In this study, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of the HAK gene family in peach and identified 17 PpHAK family members. Furthermore, we investigated their phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs and domains, gene structures, and interspecific synteny and orthologous relationships among Prunus species (including plum, Japanese apricot, and sweet cherry) to elucidate their potential biological functions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of the PpHAK Gene Family in Peach

The protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana potassium transporters were obtained from the TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org, accessed on 17 August 2025). Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles for characteristic potassium transporter domains, including the potassium transporter domain (PF02705), were downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 17 August 2025). Identification of potassium transporter gene family members in peach was performed primarily using TBtools II software v2.36. The process involved the following steps: (1) BLASTP search against the Prunus persica genome (Phytozome database, https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/, accessed on 17 August 2025) using Arabidopsis sequences as query, with an E-value cutoff of 1 × 10−5; (2) Domain verification was conducted using the built-in HMM search function in TBtools, with a domain E-value threshold set to 1 × 10−5. Redundant sequences were removed, and conserved domain validation was further performed using the SMART database (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, accessed on 10 September 2025) integrated within TBtools. The resulting non-redundant sequences were identified as putative potassium transporter genes in peach.
Physicochemical properties of the identified proteins were analyzed using the ProtParam tool in TBtools. Transmembrane helix predictions were performed with the embedded TMHMM module, and subcellular localization was predicted using the WoLF PSORT tool. Functional motifs and potential modification sites were analyzed based on the PROSITE database and other integrated prediction utilities within TBtools.

2.2. Gene Structure and Motif Analyses

To analyze exon/intron structures, the genomic and coding sequences of peach potassium transporter genes identified from the ‘HJML’ genome were submitted to the Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (GSDS 2.0, http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 17 August 2025). Conserved motifs were identified using the MEME online tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme/, accessed on 10 September 2025) with default parameters, retrieving the top 10 motifs.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Classification, Chromosomal Distribution, and Synteny Analysis

To elucidate the evolutionary relationships of PpHAK genes, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using HAK protein sequences from Prunus persica, Prunus salicina, Prunus mume, Prunus armeniaca, Prunus avium, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MEGA12 ClustalW with default parameters. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum likelihood (ML) method using MEGA 11, with the bootstrap value set to 1000 replicates to ensure reliability. The final tree was visualized and refined using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 10 September 2025).
The chromosomal positions of all PpHAK genes were extracted from the peach genome annotation files (GFF3) and visualized using TBtools. For interspecific synteny analysis, genome sequences and annotation files of four other Prunus species were obtained from the GDR database. Syntenic blocks and orthologous gene pairs between peach and the related species were identified using the MCScanX (Multiple Collinearity Scan) toolkit with default settings. The resulting collinearity maps were visualized using the Dual Synteny Plot functions in TBtools.

2.4. Plant Materials and Experimental Treatments

Two-year-old peach trees (‘kang zhen yi hao’) with uniform growth vigor were selected for the experiments. The plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled conditions at the Baima teaching and practice base of Nanjing Agricultural University.
The experiment was conducted in a controlled greenhouse. Uniform one-year-old peach (Prunus persica L.) seedlings of similar height and stem diameter were transplanted into plastic pots (10 L capacity). Each pot was filled with a commercial professional peat moss substrate (HAWITA Gruppe GmbH, Vechta, Germany). The basic physicochemical properties of the substrate were as follows: it consisted primarily of Sphagnum peat moss with an organic matter content of >80%, a pH (CaCl2) of 5.5–6.0, and an electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.0–1.5 mS/cm.
During the experimental period, the greenhouse environmental conditions were strictly monitored and maintained. The day/night temperatures were controlled at approximately 25 ± 2 °C and 18 ± 2 °C, respectively, with a relative humidity (RH) ranging from 50% to 60%. The seedlings were grown under natural sunlight, supplemented with artificial LED lighting to maintain a 16 h photoperiod and a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of approximately 800 μmol·m−2·s−1 at the canopy level. Prior to the foliar potassium treatments, all seedlings were allowed to acclimatize to the greenhouse conditions for two weeks. Throughout the acclimatization and experimental periods, the plants were subjected to uniform standard horticultural management, and measurements were performed to ensure consistent baseline growth across all seedlings.
The experimental layout followed a randomized complete block design with two treatments: (1) a control group (CK) sprayed with distilled water and (2) a potassium-treated group (LEAF) sprayed with a 0.2% (w/v) potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4, Cat. No. P5379, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) solution; the final applied K+ concentration was 14.7 mM. Foliar applications were performed twice a week. Seven days after the final application, fully expanded leaves from the middle of the current-year shoots were collected for physiological measurements and transcriptomic analysis. All samples were either measured immediately for gas exchange or flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for total RNA extraction and further analysis. Each treatment was performed with three biological replicates.

2.5. Total RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from ‘Kang zhen yi hao’ seedlings using a Polysaccharide and Polyphenol-Rich Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (DP441, TIANGEN, Beijing, China). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the PrimeScript™ First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out on an ABI QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Singapore) using gene-specific primers. For each gene, three independent biological replicates and three technical replicates were analyzed. Relative transcript levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

2.6. Measurement of Gas Exchange Parameters

Photosynthetic gas exchange parameters were measured on clear days between 9:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. to avoid the “midday depression” of photosynthesis. Fully expanded leaves from the middle of the current-year shoots (the same position used for biochemical analysis) were selected from both the CK and LEAF groups at the Baima teaching and practice base of Nanjing Agricultural University. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and transpiration rate (E) were determined using a portable photosynthesis system (CL340, CID Bio-Science, Camas, WA, USA). Each treatment was measured with 6 biological replicates to ensure statistical accuracy.

2.7. Determination of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured on the same leaves used for gas exchange analysis using a pulse-amplitude-modulated fluorometer (PAM-2500, Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Prior to determining the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), the leaves were dark-adapted for at least 30 min using specialized leaf clips. The minimal fluorescence (Fo) and maximal fluorescence (Fm) in the dark-adapted state were recorded. The effective quantum yield of PSII (Y(II)) was calculated using the formula.

2.8. Determination of Sucrose Content

The sucrose content in the fresh peach leaves was determined using a commercial Sucrose Assay Kit (Catalog No. D799790-0100, Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Briefly, approximately 0.1 g of fresh leaf tissue was ground at room temperature. After adding 0.5 mL of the extraction buffer and brief homogenization, the mixture was rapidly transferred into a centrifuge tube and incubated in an 80 °C water bath for 10 min with occasional vortexing (3–5 times). After cooling to room temperature, the homogenate was centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min at 25 °C. The resulting supernatant was collected and mixed with 2 mg of the decolorizing reagent (provided in the kit), followed by an 80 °C water bath incubation for 30 min. Subsequently, an additional 0.5 mL of extraction buffer was added to the mixture, which was then centrifuged again at 4000× g for 10 min at 25 °C. The final clear supernatant was collected, and subsequent colorimetric measurement was carried out at 480 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.9. Determination of Total Potassium Content

Leaf samples were first inactivated at 105 °C for 30 min and then dried in an oven at 75 °C until reaching a constant weight. The dried leaf material was subsequently ground into a fine powder and passed through a 100-mesh nylon sieve. An appropriate amount of the leaf powder was digested using a microwave digestion system with HNO3. The concentrations of potassium were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (710 ICP-OES, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed with at least three independent biological replicates. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance between the control (CK) and treatment (LEAF) groups was determined using an independent two-sample Student’s t-test and three independent biological replicates. All statistical analyses and data visualizations were conducted using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. In the figures, asterisks denote significant differences: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001, while “ns” indicates no significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of PpHAK Family Members

To systematically identify the PpHAK gene family members within the Prunus persica (peach) genome, we performed HMMER searches along with verification of the conserved PF02705 domain. A total of 17 PpHAK genes were ultimately identified and subsequently named PpHAK1 to PpHAK17 (Table 1). The physicochemical properties of these 17 PpHAK proteins were comprehensively predicted via bioinformatics analysis. The results (Table 1) indicated that these family members exhibited significant diversity in protein size. Their amino acid (aa) sequence lengths ranged from 174 aa (PpHAK16) to 850 aa (PpHAK15), with corresponding theoretical molecular weights (MW) spanning from 20.39 kDa (PpHAK16) to 94.70 kDa (PpHAK15). The theoretical isoelectric points (pI) ranged from 5.29 (PpHAK15) to 9.04 (PpHAK5), indicating that the family comprises both acidic and alkaline proteins. Based on the instability index (II) predictions, 12 of the 17 members (e.g., PpHAK3, PpHAK4, and PpHAK11) had II values greater than 40 and were classified as unstable, whereas the remaining five (e.g., PpHAK1, PpHAK6, and PpHAK14) were predicted to be stable. Furthermore, in terms of hydrophobicity, 16 of the PpHAK proteins had positive Grand Average of Hydropathicity (GRAVY) values (ranging from 0.255 to 0.457), indicating a hydrophobic nature. The sole exception was PpHAK16 (GRAVY = −0.766), which was predicted to be hydrophilic. Moreover, most members possessed high aliphatic indices (ranging from 76.72 to 111.67), implying high thermostability. Taken together, the significant variations in physicochemical properties, including sequence length, pI, stability, and hydrophobicity, among the PpHAK family members suggest extensive functional divergence.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Subfamily Classification of the PpHAK Gene Family

To elucidate the evolutionary history and conservation of the PpHAK gene family within the genus Prunus, we constructed a phylogenetic tree using full-length HAK protein sequences from five stone fruit species (peach, Prunus persica; plum, Prunus salicina; mei, Prunus mume; apricot, Prunus armeniaca; and sweet cherry, Prunus avium), as well as the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 1).
The phylogenetic topology classified all identified HAK/KUP/KT transporters into four distinct lineages, designated as Groups A, B, C, and D. This clustering pattern was consistent across all examined Prunus species, indicating that the diversification of the HAK family predates the speciation of stone fruits. Based on the phylogenetic topology, the PpHAK family members were classified into distinct clades. Specifically, PpHAK4, PpHAK5, PpHAK7, PpHAK8, PpHAK9, PpHAK14, and PpHAK6 were clustered within Group A. In contrast, Group B comprised PpHAK1, PpHAK2, PpHAK3, PpHAK15, PpHAK16, and PpHAK17. Furthermore, PpHAK10, PpHAK11, PpHAK12, and PpHAK13 were assigned to Group D.

3.3. Phylogenetic Relationships, Conserved Motifs, and Gene Structure Analysis of the PpHAK Gene Family

To elucidate the evolutionary relationships and structural characteristics of the PpHAK gene family, we performed a comprehensive analysis including phylogenetic tree construction, conserved motif identification, domain prediction, and exon–intron structure organization for the 17 identified PpHAK genes (Figure 2). The phylogenetic tree, constructed based on full-length protein sequences (Figure 2, left panel), revealed that the 17 PpHAK members were clustered into distinct subfamilies. The clustering pattern indicates that members within the same evolutionary clade share closer phylogenetic relationships and generally exhibit similar structural characteristics. A total of five conserved motifs (Motifs 1–5) were identified using the MEME suite. As illustrated in Figure 2, the motif distribution patterns in most PpHAK proteins were highly conserved, characterized by a typical arrangement order of Motifs 1, 2, 3, 5, and 4. This consistency suggests a high degree of evolutionary conservation within the PpHAK family. Notably, motif deletions were observed in specific members; for instance, PpHAK13 contained only Motif 2, and PpHAK16 possessed only Motif 4. These structural truncations may imply evolutionary events such as segmental loss or pseudogenization, potentially leading to functional divergence. The analysis of conserved domains (CDD) revealed that the majority of PpHAK proteins possess the canonical K_trans superfamily domain (indicated in yellow), which is the functional core region for potassium transporters. Furthermore, subfamily-specific domain distributions were observed. For example, members such as PpHAK4 and PpHAK9 contained the PLN00149 domain (green), whereas PpHAK3 and PpHAK15 were characterized by the presence of the PLN00151 domain (teal). The gene structure diagram (Figure 2, right panel) illustrates the arrangement of coding sequences (CDS, yellow boxes), introns (black lines), and untranslated regions (UTRs, green boxes). The analysis demonstrated that members within the same subfamily tended to share similar exon–intron organizations in terms of number and length. For instance, the clade containing PpHAK4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 14 exhibited highly consistent gene structures. In contrast, PpHAK15 displayed the longest genomic sequence and a complex intron distribution. This structural diversity likely correlates with the functional diversification of the PpHAK family members.

3.4. Chromosomal Distribution and Evolutionary Conservation of the PpHAK Gene Family

To elucidate the genomic organization and evolutionary mechanisms of the PpHAK gene family, we mapped the chromosomal locations of its members and performed a comparative synteny analysis across Prunus species (Figure 3A). Chromosomal mapping revealed that the 17 PpHAK genes are unevenly distributed across seven peach chromosomes (hjml1–6 and hjml8), with no members detected on hjml7. Notably, Chromosome 1 (hjml1) and Chromosome 4 (hjml4) emerged as distribution hotspots. A high-density gene cluster comprising five genes (Hjml.4g002032.1 to Hjml.4g001811.1) was identified on hjml4, while paired gene loci were also observed on hjml1 (e.g., Hjml.1g002519.1) and hjml8. To further investigate the evolutionary trajectory of this family within stone fruits, a comparative genomic map was constructed between P. persica and four related species: P. salicina, P. mume, P. armeniaca, and P. avium (Figure 3B). The analysis revealed extensive macrosynteny among Prunus genomes, with peach chromosomes exhibiting a clear linear correspondence with those of the other species. By tracking HAK loci (indicated by red inverted triangles), we identified highly conserved orthologous gene pairs (blue lines) across all five species. In particular, the gene cluster on hjml4 showed strict syntenic mapping to the homologous chromosomes (LG04/Pmu4/chr4/chr_4) in the other genomes.

3.5. Exogenous Potassium Treatment Significantly Enhances Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosystem Activity in Peach Leaves

To evaluate the physiological regulation of potassium on the photosynthetic performance of leaves, gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured under control (CK) and potassium-treated (LEAF) conditions (Figure 4A). The results demonstrated that exogenous potassium supply comprehensively improved the photosynthetic efficiency and Photosystem II (PSII) function of peach leaves (Figure 4B). Potassium treatment significantly increased both the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and transpiration rate (E). Specifically, the Pn in the LEAF group reached approximately 14 μmol·m−2·s−1, representing an approximately 33% increase compared to the control. More notably, E more than doubled following K application, surging from 1.2 mmol·m−2·s−1 in the control to approximately 2.8 mmol·m−2·s−1, implying a substantial improvement in stomatal conductance. Potassium supply similarly improved the energy conversion efficiency of reaction centers. The effective quantum yield of PSII, Y(II), in the LEAF group significantly rose to over 0.8, markedly outperforming the control. Meanwhile, the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII, Fv/Fm, significantly increased from 0.73 to 0.82, indicating that potassium treatment effectively alleviated potential photoinhibition and maintained the photosynthetic apparatus in an optimal physiological state.
To elucidate the molecular mechanism by which potassium promotes photosynthate export in peach leaves, the transcriptional levels of four key sugar transport and metabolism genes (PpTST1, PpINV, PpERDL6, and PpPLT5-1) were analyzed using qRT-PCR (Figure 4C). Expression profiling revealed that exogenous potassium treatment significantly upregulated the expression of all examined genes compared to the water-treated control. surging 1.2 mmol·m−2·s−1. The expression of the Tonoplast Sugar Transporter gene PpTST1 increased by approximately 1.5-fold. The invertase gene PpINV was significantly upregulated in the K+-treated group, with expression levels reaching approximately 1.5 times that of the control. The early response to the dehydration-like gene PpERDL6 also exhibited significant upregulation, approximately 1.3 times. The polyol/sorbitol transporter gene PpPLT5-1 showed the most dramatic response, with expression levels surging to over 6-fold that of the control group, indicating an extremely significant difference. These results demonstrate that exogenous potassium supply activates the transcriptional machinery of key genes responsible for transmembrane sugar transport (particularly sorbitol transport) and vacuolar sugar pool regulation, thereby enhancing the sugar turnover and export capacity of source leaves.
To assess the physiological efficacy of exogenous K supply, we quantified leaf total K and sucrose levels. Foliar application led to a notable elevation in internal K status, with concentrations increasing by approximately 12.4% over the control group (Figure 4D). This enrichment in K was accompanied by a significant increase in sucrose content of approximately 10.6%, providing empirical evidence that leaf-applied K not only improves the plant’s nutritional standing but also actively promotes the accumulation of primary photosynthetic assimilates.

3.6. Differential Regulation of PpHAK Family Genes by Exogenous Potassium Treatment in Peach Leaves

To investigate the impact of potassium supply on the transcriptional regulation of the PpHAK gene family, the expression profiles of 16 PpHAK genes were analyzed in peach leaves under water control (CK) and potassium treatment (LEAF) conditions using qRT-PCR (Figure 5). The results revealed three distinct response patterns among family members.
Exogenous potassium treatment significantly reshaped the transcriptional landscape of the PpHAK gene family in peach leaves, characterized by subfamily-specific reprogramming of gene expression. Quantitative analysis revealed a bidirectional response pattern to potassium signals: approximately half of the family members, including PpHAK1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 14, were significantly upregulated following K application. Notably, PpHAK1, PpHAK5, PpHAK7, PpHAK9, and PpHAK13 exhibited the most robust transcriptional activation, with relative expression levels increasing more than 10-fold compared to the control, identifying them as primary positive regulators in high-K environments. In sharp contrast, a distinct subset of genes (PpHAK2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) underwent significant repression; specifically, PpHAK8 and PpHAK10 showed a drastic reduction in transcript abundance to less than 20% of basal levels, indicative of a classic negative feedback regulation mechanism under high potassium availability. Meanwhile, the expression of PpHAK15 and PpHAK16 remained statistically unaltered (ns), suggesting that these genes may exhibit constitutive expression or are regulated by factors other than potassium concentration.

4. Discussion

4.1. Genome-Wide Identification and Evolutionary Conservation of the HAK Family

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the HAK/KUP/KT gene family plays a pivotal role in potassium uptake, plant growth regulation, and stress resistance. In this study, we identified 17 HAK genes in the peach (Prunus persica) genome. Compared to other species, the number of HAK genes in peach is moderate: 13 in Arabidopsis [9], 21 in rice [20], and 21 in the tea plant [4], whereas rapeseed and apple contain as many as 33 genes [21]. To further investigate the distribution of this family within the genus Prunus, we also identified HAK genes in plum (18), mei (33), apricot (23), and sweet cherry (20). Our analysis reveals that the HAK family is relatively conserved across Prunus species. The phylogenetic topology suggests that these clades may have diversified early in plant evolution, though further molecular dating is required to confirm the exact timeline relative to the monocot–dicot split.
Collinearity analysis among Prunus species revealed a high degree of synteny for the HAK gene family. This high level of conservation suggests that the HAK family underwent strong purifying selection during the evolution of stone fruits. This implies that the potassium uptake function is essential for plant survival, and evolutionary mechanisms have restricted large-scale gene loss or translocation. Our results confirm that the major expansion events of the HAK family occurred prior to the divergence of Prunus species. The extant genes represent a legacy from a common ancestral gene pool, retained through vertical inheritance rather than generated independently after speciation. These findings support the view that Prunus genomes are highly stable and have not undergone extensive chromosomal rearrangements [22].
Structural analysis demonstrated that the majority of PpHAK genes possess five complete conserved motifs and the standard K_trans domain, providing the structural basis for their core function as potassium transporters [4]. Genes within the same phylogenetic clade exhibited highly similar intron–exon structures in terms of length and number. This structural consistency suggests potential functional redundancy among family members, ensuring that if one gene is compromised, others can compensate [23]. Meanwhile, intron gain and loss represent important mechanisms in gene family evolution [24]. The structural diversity observed in this study, such as the extended length and numerous introns of PpHAK15, contrasted with the truncated structure of PpHAK13, indicates that different subfamilies have been subjected to distinct evolutionary pressures.
Beyond the canonical K_trans domain, we observed domain diversification within the family: PpHAK4 and PpHAK9 contain the PLN00149 domain, whereas PpHAK3 and PpHAK15 possess the PLN00151 domain. PLN00151 is a signature of plant potassium transporters and has been previously reported in other Rosaceae species, such as strawberry (Fragaria vesca) [25]. The presence of PLN00151 further confirms the identity of these genes as functional potassium uptake permeases. Similar domain diversification has been reported in other species, such as sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), where members containing PLN00149 were distinguished from those with the canonical K_trans domain [26]. These distinct conserved domains imply differences in substrate specificity. Members containing PLN00149 may differ from those with PLN00151 in transport affinity or response to environmental signals. Such domain variation likely represents neofunctionalization, where duplicate genes evolved novel functions to adapt to new environmental demands following gene duplication. It should be noted that our current findings are primarily based on bioinformatic predictions and transcriptional profiling. Further functional validations—such as K+ uptake measurements, ion flux analysis, and heterologous expression assays—are necessary to definitively confirm the specific transport capabilities and physiological roles of these candidate PpHAK genes in peach.

4.2. The Influence of Potassium Transporters on Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is the primary process converting light energy into chemical energy and serves as the core driver for material cycling and energy flow in the biosphere [27]. For horticultural crops, particularly fruit trees, leaves act as the primary “source” organs; their photosynthetic capacity directly determines the synthesis rate of assimilates (carbohydrates), which in turn governs the expansion and sugar accumulation of the fruit “sink” [28]. In intensive orchard management, enhancing leaf photosynthetic efficiency (Pn) is the physiological cornerstone for achieving high yield and quality [29]. However, photosynthesis is highly susceptible to environmental factors and mineral nutrient status. Potassium (K+), as the most abundant cation in plants, plays an irreplaceable role in maintaining photosynthetic enzyme activity and optimizing carbon assimilation [1]. Our physiological data confirm that exogenous potassium supply significantly improves the photosynthetic performance of peach leaves. Specifically, K treatment increased the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by approximately 33% and more than doubled the transpiration rate (E). This result highlights the central role of K+ in stomatal regulation: acting as the primary osmotic in guard cells, K+ accumulation drives water influx and induces stomatal opening, thereby alleviating stomatal limitations and increasing intercellular CO2 concentration.
Furthermore, improvements in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters reveal a protective mechanism for reaction centers [30]. Potassium treatment significantly elevated the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and the effective quantum yield Y(II). This indicates that potassium optimizes the trans-thylakoid proton gradient, facilitates ATP synthesis, and effectively dissipates excess light energy, preventing photoinhibition damage to PSII. The improvement in photosynthetic physiology relies on the precise regulation of intracellular potassium concentrations. This study revealed that exogenous K+ treatment significantly reshaped the expression profile of the potassium transporter gene family, with genes such as PpHAK1 (an AtHAK5 ortholog), PpHAK5, and PpHAK9 surging more than 10-fold. We propose that these high-affinity transporters are not repressed but rather substrate-induced under K+ application, mediating rapid transmembrane K+ influx into mesophyll and guard cells. In our study, foliar K application significantly improved net photosynthesis in peach leaves, which is consistent with the enhanced expression of K-transporter genes. Such physiological improvements under exogenous nutrient or water management are crucial for the establishment and performance of woody perennials. For instance, recent research on Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels demonstrated that strategic resource management during the nursery stage can significantly modulate stomatal behavior and gas-exchange parameters, ultimately determining the growth success of plantlets derived from different propagation methods [31]. Like the findings in argan trees, our results suggest that optimizing leaf-level nutrient status through foliar K spray can effectively “prime” the photosynthetic machinery of peach trees, potentially leading to better carbon assimilation and resource use efficiency in woody nursery systems.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study clarifies that foliar potassium application enhances photosynthetic efficiency and assimilate accumulation in peach. A total of 17 PpHAK genes were identified, exhibiting high evolutionary conservation and a complex framework across the Prunus genus, which underscores their fundamental role in maintaining K+ homeostasis. Foliar K+ application is strongly associated with the differential transcript abundance of specific PpHAK genes, most notably the significant upregulation of high-affinity transporters, including PpHAK1, PpHAK5, and PpHAK9. This genetic activation is closely coupled with a 33% increase in Pn and improved PSII quantum yield, primarily through optimized stomatal regulation and enhanced photo-protective capacity. Furthermore, the concomitant induction of key sugar transporters, most notably the 6-fold enhancement in PpPLT5-1 expression, demonstrates that K+ status serves as a regulatory switch for accelerating the export of sorbitol and sucrose from source leaves. These findings provide a robust theoretical foundation for precision fertilization programs in stone fruit production, emphasizing that targeted potassium management is essential for maximizing carbon assimilation and improving the fruit’s nutritional and commercial quality (Figure 6).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae12030388/s1, Table S1: Details of the genome sequences, gene feature files, and protein sequences used in this study; Table S2: Details of the primers used in this study; Figure S1: Statistical analysis of VPD data.

Author Contributions

Z.G. and Z.W. designed and wrote the paper. Z.G., Z.W., C.Y. and S.S. revised the final manuscript. Z.W., P.Z., X.X. and C.Y. aimed to do experiments. X.X., F.G., X.L., Y.Y., Z.N. and T.S. helped to analyze the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Jiangsu Modern Agricultural Key Technology Integration and Extension Project (JCTG [2025]12), the Jiangsu Province Independent Innovation Project (CX(2023)2002), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sardans, J.; Peñuelas, J. Potassium Control of Plant Functions: Ecological and Agricultural Implications. Plants 2021, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stone, M.S.; Martyn, L.; Weaver, C.M. Potassium Intake, Bioavailability, Hypertension, and Glucose Control. Nutrients 2016, 8, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhao, H.; Ding, X.; Dong, H.; Ren, B.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, J. Concurrent Increases in Planting Density and Potassium Fertilizer Application Rate: An Effective Strategy for Enhancing Grain Yield and Improving Lodging Resistance in Summer Maize. J. Integr. Agric. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, T.; Lu, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Ma, J.; Cheng, X.; Xia, E.; Wan, X.; Zhang, Z. HAK/KUP/KT Family Potassium Transporter Genes Are Involved in Potassium Deficiency and Stress Responses in Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis L.): Expression and Functional Analysis. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Azeem, F.; Ahmad, B.; Atif, R.M.; Ali, M.A.; Nadeem, H.; Hussain, S.; Manzoor, H.; Azeem, M.; Afzal, M. Genome-Wide Analysis of Potassium Transport-Related Genes in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Their Role in Abiotic Stress Responses. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2018, 36, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, L.; Chi, C.; Lv, S.; Tong, Y.; Yang, L. Effects of Different Sources of Potassium Fertiliser on Yield, Fruit Quality and Nutrient Absorption in “Harward” Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Open Life Sci. 2025, 20, 20251114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, J.; Nolan, T.M.; Ye, H.; Zhang, M.; Tong, H.; Xin, P.; Chu, J.; Chu, C.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 Transcription Factors Are Involved in Brassinosteroid-Regulated Plant Growth and Drought Responses. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bañuelos, M.A.; Garciadeblas, B.; Cubero, B.; Rodríguez-Navarro, A. Inventory and Functional Characterization of the HAK Potassium Transporters of Rice. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rubio, F.; Santa-María, G.E.; Rodríguez-Navarro, A. Cloning of Arabidopsis and Barley cDNAs Encoding HAK Potassium Transporters in Root and Shoot Cells. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 109, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, X.; Liu, W.; Qiu, C.-W.; Zeng, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chen, Z.-H.; Wu, F. HvAKT2 and HvHAK1 Confer Drought Tolerance in Barley through Enhanced Leaf Mesophyll H+ Homoeostasis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, T.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; Hu, Q.; Chen, G.; Cai, J.; Wu, T.; Moran, N.; Yu, L.; et al. The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mengel, K.; Arneke, W.-W. Effect of Potassium on the Water Potential, the Pressure Potential, the Osmotic Potential and Cell Elongation in Leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol. Plant. 1982, 54, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guan, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Ge, Z.; Dai, X. Transcriptomic and Physiological Insights into Auxin-Mediated Root Growth and Potassium Uptake in Tobacco under Low-Potassium Stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, S.; Song, M.; Guo, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xu, C.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, L. The Potassium Channel FaTPK1 Plays a Critical Role in Fruit Quality Formation in Strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, K.; Hu, C.; Liao, P.; Hu, Y.; Sun, X.; Tan, Q.; Pan, Z.; Xu, S.; Dong, Z.; Wu, S. Potassium Stimulates Fruit Sugar Accumulation by Increasing Carbon Flow in Citrus sinensis. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, C.; Wang, J.; Shi, X.; Kang, Y.; Xie, C.; Peng, L.; Dong, C.; Shen, Q.; Xu, Y. Transcriptome Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes Induced by Low and High Potassium Levels Provides Insight into Fruit Sugar Metabolism of Pear. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, W.; Lin, L.; Deng, Q.; Xia, H.; Liang, D.; Lv, X. Effects of Potassium-Containing Fertilizers on Sugar and Organic Acid Metabolism in Grape Fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; Wei, J. Genome-Wide Analysis and Identification of HAK Potassium Transporter Gene Family in Maize (Zea mays L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 8465–8473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Wu, P.; Hu, X.; Chang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, K.; Zhai, S.; Yang, X.; He, L.; Guo, X. Identification and Stress Function Verification of the HAK/KUP/KT Family in Gossypium hirsutum. Gene 2022, 818, 146249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Amrutha, R.N.; Sekhar, P.N.; Varshney, R.K.; Kishor, P.B.K. Genome-Wide Analysis and Identification of Genes Related to Potassium Transporter Families in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 708–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tahir, M.M.; Tong, L.; Xie, L.; Wu, T.; Ghani, M.I.; Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Gao, X.; Tariq, L.; Zhang, D.; et al. Identification of the HAK Gene Family Reveals Their Critical Response to Potassium Regulation during Adventitious Root Formation in Apple Rootstock. Hortic. Plant J. 2023, 9, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verde, I.; Abbott, A.G.; Scalabrin, S.; Jung, S.; Shu, S.; Marroni, F.; Zhebentyayeva, T.; Dettori, M.T.; Grimwood, J.; Cattonaro, F.; et al. The High-Quality Draft Genome of Peach (Prunus persica) Identifies Unique Patterns of Genetic Diversity, Domestication and Genome Evolution. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, H.; Xu, L.; Gu, Z. Growth of Novel Epistatic Interactions by Gene Duplication. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, H.; Zhu, W.; Silva, J.C.; Gu, X.; Buell, C.R. Intron Gain and Loss in Segmentally Duplicated Genes in Rice. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, R41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yi, S.; Mao, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H. FveARF2 Negatively Regulates Fruit Ripening and Quality in Strawberry. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1023739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, L.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; Hou, K.; Zhang, H.; Shen, C. Identification and Functional Analysis of Cation-Efflux Transporter 1 from Brassica juncea L. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stirbet, A.; Lazár, D.; Guo, Y.; Govindjee, G. Photosynthesis: Basics, history and modelling. Ann. Bot. 2020, 126, 511–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pavel, E.W.; DeJong, T.M. Source- and Sink-Limited Growth Periods of Developing Peach Fruits Indicated by Relative Growth Rate Analysis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1993, 118, 820–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nazari, M.; Kordrostami, M.; Ghasemi-Soloklui, A.A.; Eaton-Rye, J.J.; Pashkovskiy, P.; Kuznetsov, V.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Enhancing Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity through Genetic Modification. Cells 2024, 13, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nistor, E.; Dobrei, A.G.; Mattii, G.B.; Dobrei, A. Calcium and Potassium Accumulation during the Growing Season in Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot Grape Varieties. Plants 2022, 11, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ait Hammou, R.; Harrouni, C.; Ben El Caid, M.; Hallouti, A.; Baroud, S.; Daoud, S. Establishment of Argan Tree Plantlets (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) Grown from Generative and Vegetative Propagation under Different Watering Regimes at the Nursery Stage. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 44, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of HAK/KUP/KT transporters from peach and other plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length protein sequences of 17 PpHAKs from Prunus persica, along with HAK family members from Arabidopsis thaliana, Prunus salicina, Prunus mume, Prunus armeniaca, and Prunus avium. The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. All transporters are categorized into four distinct evolutionary clades (Groups A, B, C, and D), which are indicated by different background colors. The blue square denotes the HAK members identified in peach. The scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of HAK/KUP/KT transporters from peach and other plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length protein sequences of 17 PpHAKs from Prunus persica, along with HAK family members from Arabidopsis thaliana, Prunus salicina, Prunus mume, Prunus armeniaca, and Prunus avium. The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. All transporters are categorized into four distinct evolutionary clades (Groups A, B, C, and D), which are indicated by different background colors. The blue square denotes the HAK members identified in peach. The scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site.
Horticulturae 12 00388 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs, domains, and gene structures of the PpHAK family in peach. Phylogenetic tree: NJ tree based on 17 PpHAK protein sequences. Conserved motifs: Motifs 1–5 identified by MEME. Conserved domains: Identification of K_trans superfamily, PLN00149, and PLN00151 domains. Gene structure: exon–intron organization; yellow, green, and black lines represent CDS, UTR, and introns, respectively.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs, domains, and gene structures of the PpHAK family in peach. Phylogenetic tree: NJ tree based on 17 PpHAK protein sequences. Conserved motifs: Motifs 1–5 identified by MEME. Conserved domains: Identification of K_trans superfamily, PLN00149, and PLN00151 domains. Gene structure: exon–intron organization; yellow, green, and black lines represent CDS, UTR, and introns, respectively.
Horticulturae 12 00388 g002
Figure 3. Chromosomal distribution and synteny analysis of HAK genes: (A) Chromosomal localization of PpHAK genes: The 17 identified PpHAK genes are mapped onto seven peach chromosomes (hjml1–6 and hjml8); the vertical scale represents chromosome length in megabases (Mb). (B) Interspecific synteny analysis: Collinearity relationship of HAK genes between Prunus persica and four related Rosaceae species (P. salicina, P. mume, P. armeniaca, and P. avium). Gray lines in the background represent collinear blocks across the genomes, while blue lines highlight orthologous HAK gene pairs. Red inverted triangles indicate the specific loci of HAK family members on each chromosome.
Figure 3. Chromosomal distribution and synteny analysis of HAK genes: (A) Chromosomal localization of PpHAK genes: The 17 identified PpHAK genes are mapped onto seven peach chromosomes (hjml1–6 and hjml8); the vertical scale represents chromosome length in megabases (Mb). (B) Interspecific synteny analysis: Collinearity relationship of HAK genes between Prunus persica and four related Rosaceae species (P. salicina, P. mume, P. armeniaca, and P. avium). Gray lines in the background represent collinear blocks across the genomes, while blue lines highlight orthologous HAK gene pairs. Red inverted triangles indicate the specific loci of HAK family members on each chromosome.
Horticulturae 12 00388 g003
Figure 4. Physiological and molecular responses of peach leaves to foliar potassium application: (A) Plant phenotype: Representative visual phenotypes of peach leaves under water control (CK) and potassium treatment (LEAF) conditions. (B) Photosynthetic parameters: Comparison of Pn and E between CK and LEAF groups. Chlorophyll fluorescence: Changes in maximum quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) and effective quantum yield (Y(II)) of PSII. (C) Sugar metabolism and transport gene expression. (D) Total leaf potassium (K) concentration and leaf sucrose content. Data are presented as mean ± SD of at least three biological replicates. Asterisks denote significant differences between groups according to Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. Physiological and molecular responses of peach leaves to foliar potassium application: (A) Plant phenotype: Representative visual phenotypes of peach leaves under water control (CK) and potassium treatment (LEAF) conditions. (B) Photosynthetic parameters: Comparison of Pn and E between CK and LEAF groups. Chlorophyll fluorescence: Changes in maximum quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) and effective quantum yield (Y(II)) of PSII. (C) Sugar metabolism and transport gene expression. (D) Total leaf potassium (K) concentration and leaf sucrose content. Data are presented as mean ± SD of at least three biological replicates. Asterisks denote significant differences between groups according to Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Horticulturae 12 00388 g004
Figure 5. Expression profiles of the PpHAK gene family in peach leaves in response to potassium treatment. Data are means ± SD (n ≥ 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, “ns” indicates no significant difference.
Figure 5. Expression profiles of the PpHAK gene family in peach leaves in response to potassium treatment. Data are means ± SD (n ≥ 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, “ns” indicates no significant difference.
Horticulturae 12 00388 g005
Figure 6. Proposed model of foliar potassium application enhances photosynthesis and sugar accumulation in peach leaves (the upward arrow indicates upregulation of gene expression).
Figure 6. Proposed model of foliar potassium application enhances photosynthesis and sugar accumulation in peach leaves (the upward arrow indicates upregulation of gene expression).
Horticulturae 12 00388 g006
Table 1. Identification and characterization of PpHAK family members.
Table 1. Identification and characterization of PpHAK family members.
Gene IDNumber of Amino AcidMolecular Weight (kDa)pIInstability Index (II)Aliphatic IndexGRAVY
Hjml.1g002519.179288,263.968.8127.71105.810.283
Hjml.1g002521.172280,977.18.4933.43108.890.385
Hjml.1g003037.181890,990.156.4244.65102.330.322
Hjml.1g003038.177486,805.288.6143.06103.090.255
Hjml.1g003856.183292,984.519.0443.18102.370.266
Hjml.6g000513.174082,380.756.8835.32107.810.455
Hjml.5g002465.179087,842.847.9940.3105.490.357
Hjml.2g000625.178888,218.047.5541.28108.720.376
Hjml.3g000322.177586,973.667.340.19107.340.331
Hjml.4g002032.180489,778.878.3737.73106.890.336
Hjml.4g002031.184393,557.175.8248.23100.430.258
Hjml.4g002030.179588,598.828.3439.54108.330.381
Hjml.4g002028.119821,484.867.8342.72111.670.361
Hjml.4g001811.175283,815.998.9633.19108.590.457
Hjml.8g002099.185094,701.455.2940.05109.610.332
Hjml.8g000143.117420,390.945.5445.8676.72−0.766
Hjml.8g000142.178688,746.236.5932.12105.750.185
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Yao, C.; Yang, Y.; Segbo, S.; Xu, X.; Lin, X.; Zhou, P.; Gao, F.; Ni, Z.; Shi, T.; et al. Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Capacity and Expression of Potassium and Sugar Transporters in Peach (Prunus persica). Horticulturae 2026, 12, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030388

AMA Style

Wang Z, Yao C, Yang Y, Segbo S, Xu X, Lin X, Zhou P, Gao F, Ni Z, Shi T, et al. Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Capacity and Expression of Potassium and Sugar Transporters in Peach (Prunus persica). Horticulturae. 2026; 12(3):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ziqi, Chenjia Yao, Yong Yang, Silas Segbo, Xiaoyu Xu, Ximeng Lin, Pengyu Zhou, Feng Gao, Zhaojun Ni, Ting Shi, and et al. 2026. "Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Capacity and Expression of Potassium and Sugar Transporters in Peach (Prunus persica)" Horticulturae 12, no. 3: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030388

APA Style

Wang, Z., Yao, C., Yang, Y., Segbo, S., Xu, X., Lin, X., Zhou, P., Gao, F., Ni, Z., Shi, T., & Gao, Z. (2026). Effects of Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Capacity and Expression of Potassium and Sugar Transporters in Peach (Prunus persica). Horticulturae, 12(3), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop