Rapid In Vitro Propagation of Quercus gilva via Nodal Explants: A Protocol for Culture Establishment, Shoot Proliferation, and Ex Vitro Rooting
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials and Culture Conditions
2.1.1. Plant Materials
2.1.2. Culture Condition
2.2. Culture Initiation
2.2.1. Disinfection of Explants
2.2.2. Anti-Browning of Explants
2.2.3. Shoot Induction
2.3. Shoot Multiplication
2.4. Ex Vitro Rooting and Acclimatization
2.5. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Aseptic Establishment and Shoot Induction
3.2. Shoot Multiplication
3.3. Ex Vitro Rooting
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of Disinfection and Anti-Browning Treatments on Aseptic Establishment
4.2. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Shoot Induction, Shoot Multiplication, and Ex Vitro Rooting
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sugiura, N.; Tang, D.; Kurokochi, H.; Saito, Y.; Ide, Y. Genetic structure of Quercus gilva Blume in Japan as revealed by chloroplast DNA sequences. Botany 2015, 93, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, E.K.; Cho, W.B.; Park, J.S.; Choi, I.S.; Kwak, M.; Kim, B.Y.; Lee, J.H. A disjunctive marginal edge of evergreen broad-leaved oak (Quercus gilva) in East Asia: The high genetic distinctiveness and unusual diversity of Jeju island populations and insight into a massive, independent postglacial colonization. Genes 2020, 11, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, J.; Xia, M.; He, G.; Gonzalez, N.C.; Zhou, S.; Lan, K.; Ouyang, L.; Shen, X.; Jiang, X.; Cao, F.; et al. Predicting Quercus gilva distribution dynamics and its response to climate change induced by GHGs emission through MaxEnt modeling. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 357, 120841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.; Liu, N.; Jiang, X.; Qin, Z.; Farooq, T.H.; Cao, F.; Li, H. A chromosome-scale genome assembly of Quercus gilva: Insights into the evolution of Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis (Fagaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1012277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaynab, M.; Pan, D.; Fatima, M.; Sharif, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, W. Proteomics analysis of Cyclobalanopsis gilva provides new insights of low seed germination. Biochimie 2021, 180, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyun, H.J.; Song, K.M.; Choi, H.S.; Chan-Soo, K. Dynamics and Distribution of Quercus gilva Blume Population in Korean. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 2014, 28, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, S.L.; Schlarbaum, S.E. Effects of acorn size and mass on seedling quality of northern red oak (Quercus rubra). New For. 2018, 49, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hipp, A.L.; Manos, P.S.; Hahn, M.; Avishai, M.; Bodénès, C.; Cavender-Bares, J.; Crowl, A.A.; Deng, M.; Denk, T.; Fitz-Gibbon, S.; et al. Genomic landscape of the global oak phylogeny. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1198–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.F.; Yuan, S.; Crowl, A.A.; Liang, Y.Y.; Shi, Y.; Chen, X.Y.; An, Q.Q.; Kang, M.; Manos, P.S.; Wang, B. Phylogenomic analyses highlight innovation and introgression in the continental radiations of Fagaceae across the Northern Hemisphere. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Li, Z.H. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on the Rooting of Cyclobalanopsis gilva Cuttings. Guangxi For. Sci. 2014, 43, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, M.K. Plant tissue culture targeting germplasm conservation. In Advances in Plant Tissue Culture; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; pp. 205–221. [Google Scholar]
- San-José, M.C.; Ballester, A.; Vieitez, A.M. Factors affecting in vitro propagation of Quercus robur L. Tree Physiol. 1988, 4, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Vieitez, A.M.; Concepclón Sánchez, M.; Amo-Marco, J.B.; Ballester, A. Foreed flushing of branch segments as a method for obtaining reactive explants of mature Quercus robur trees for micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1994, 37, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmielarz, P.; Kotlarski, S.; Kalemba, E.M.; Martins, J.P.R.; Michalak, M. Successful in vitro shoot multiplication of Quercus robur L. trees aged up to 800 years. Plants 2023, 12, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vieitez, A.M.; Corredoira, E.; Ballester, A.; Muñoz, F.; Durán, J.; Ibarra, M. In vitro regeneration of the important North American oak species Quercus alba, Quercus bicolor and Quercus rubra. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2009, 98, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corredoira, E.; San-José, M.C.; Vieitez, A.M. Induction of somatic embryogenesis from different explants of shoot cultures derived from young Quercus alba trees. Trees 2012, 26, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M.T.; Corredoira, E.; Vieitez, A.M.; Cernadas, M.J.; Montenegro, R.; Ballester, A.; Vieitez, F.J.; San José, M.C. Micropropagation of mature Quercus ilex L. trees by axillary budding. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 131, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Gu, M.; Deng, M. In vitro propagation of oriental white oak Quercus aliena Blume. Forests 2019, 10, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzanera, J.A.; Pardos, J.A. Micropropagation of juvenile and adult Quercus suber L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1990, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, J. Tissue Culture and Rapid Micropropagation for Quercus suber L. Forests 2024, 16, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purohit, V.K.; Tamta, S.; Chandra, S.; Vyas, P.; Palni, L.M.S.; Nandi, S.K. In vitro multiplication of Quercus leucotrichophora and Q. glauca: Important Himalayan oaks. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 69, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ree, J.F.; Powell, C.; Folgado, R.; Pence, V.C.; Walters, C.; Maschinski, J. Development of a micropropagation protocol for the ex situ conservation of Nuttall’s scrub oak (Quercus dumosa). Plants 2024, 13, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ree, J.F.; Powell, C.; Folgado, R.; Pence, V.C.; Walters, C.; Maschinski, J. Establishing tissue culture lines from mature Nuttall’s scrub oak (Quercus dumosa Nutt.) for ex situ conservation. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2025, 61, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrolucká, M.G.; Gajdošová, A.; Libiaková, G. Protocol for micropropagation of Quercus spp. In Protocols for Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 85–91. [Google Scholar]
- del Carmen San José, M.; Teresa Martínez, M.; José Cernadas, M.; Montenegro, R.; Corredoira, E. Application of thidiazuron in the micropropagation of Fagaceae. In Thidiazuron: From Urea Derivative to Plant Growth Regulator; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 189–209. [Google Scholar]
- Meyad, C.; Henkrar, F.; Bouhaddou, N.; Khabar, L. Micropropagation of Quercus spp., complications and solutions—An overview. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2023, 59, 446–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toth, K.; Haapala, T.; Hohtola, A. Alleviation of browning in oak explants by chemical pretreatments. Biol. Plant. 1994, 36, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuenca, B.; San-José, M.C.; Martínez, M.T.; Ballester, A.; Vieitez, A.M. Somatic embryogenesis from stem and leaf explants of Quercus robur L. Plant Cell Rep. 1999, 18, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volkaert, H.; Schoofs, J.; Pieters, A.; De Langhe, E. Influence of explant source on in vitro axillary shoot formation in oak seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1990, 6, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kartsonas, E.; Papafotiou, M. Mother plant age and seasonal influence on in vitro propagation of Quercus euboica Pap., an endemic, rare and endangered oak species of Greece. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 90, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalupa, V. Large scale micropropagation of Quercus robur L. using adenine-type cytokinins and thidiazuron to stimulate shoot proliferation. Biol. Plant. 1988, 30, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.; Tamta, S. Influence of kinetin on in vitro rooting and survival of banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 12538–12545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez, M.C.; San-Jose, M.C.; Ballester, A.; Vieitez, A.M. Requirements for in vitro rooting of Quercus robur and Q. rubra shoots derived from mature trees. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puddephat, I.J.; Alderson, P.G.; Wright, N.A. In vitro root induction in axillary microshoots of Quercus robur L. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1999, 134, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, J.P.R.; Wawrzyniak, M.K.; Kalemba, E.M.; Ley-López, J.M.; Lira, J.M.S.; Chmielarz, P. In vitro rooting of Quercus robur, activated charcoal vs. exogenous auxin: A morphophysiological approach. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2024, 156, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, M.; Li, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, S.; Que, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhou, W. Efficient in vitro sterilization and propagation from stem segment explants of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (Mill.) IM Johnst, a multipurpose woody plant. Plants 2022, 11, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Guo, M.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, M.; Li, R.; Deng, X.; Xi, R. Efficient regeneration of mature castanopsis hystrix from in vitro stem explants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 914652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez, M.T.; Arrillaga, I.; Sales, E.; Pérez-Oliver, M.A.; González-Mas, M.D.C.; Corredoira, E. Micropropagation, characterization, and conservation of Phytophthora cinnamomi-tolerant holm oak mature trees. Forests 2021, 12, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.S.; Fu, C.H.; Su, P.; Xu, X.P.; Yuan, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, C.F.; Yu, L.J. Mechanisms and effective control of physiological browning phenomena in plant cell cultures. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 156, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, M.; Cao, F.; Tao, G.; Zhou, X. Combating browning: Mechanisms and management strategies in in vitro culture of economic woody plants. For. Res. 2024, 4, e032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, Y.; Zeng, B.; Huang, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, P. Resolving the browning during the establishment of the in vitro propogation of Prunus avium cv.’Fuchen’. Hortic. Sci. 2022, 49, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballesteros, D.; Pritchard, H.W. The cryobiotechnology of oaks: An integration of approaches for the long-term ex situ conservation of Quercus Species. Forests 2020, 11, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juncker, B.; Favre, J.M. Long-term effects of culture establishment from shoot-tip explants in micropropagating oak (Quercus robur L). In Annales des Sciences Forestières; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 1994; Volume 51, pp. 581–588. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, A.; Sekar, K.C.; Tamta, S.; Rawal, R.S. Assessment of phytochemicals, antioxidant and antimutagenic activity in micropropagated plants of Quercus serrata, a high value tree species of Himalaya. Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2018, 152, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidal, N.; Arellano, G.; San-José, M.C.; Vieitez, A.M.; Ballester, A. Developmental stages during the rooting of in-vitro-cultured Quercus robur shoots from material of juvenile and mature origin. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-José, M.C.; Martínez, M.T.; Cernadas, M.J.; Montenegro, R.; Mosteiro, F.; Corredoira, E. Biotechnological efforts for the propagation of Quercus lusitanica Lam., an endangered species. Trees 2017, 31, 1571–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier-Dinkel, A.; Becker, B.; Duckstein, D. Micropropagation and ex vitro rooting of several clones of late-flushing Quercus robur L. In Annales des Sciences Forestières; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 1993; Volume 50, pp. 319s–322s. [Google Scholar]
- Chalupa, V. Vegetative propagation of oak (Quercus robur and Q petraea) by cutting and tissue culture. In Annales des Sciences Forestières; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 1993; Volume 50, pp. 295s–307s. [Google Scholar]

| Running Water Rinsing (min) | 0.1% HgCl2 Soaking (min) | Contamination Percentage (%) | Browning Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 8 | 33.3 ± 4.4 a | 13.3 ± 3.3 e |
| 10 | 15 | 31.7 ± 1.7 a | 18.3 ± 3.3 de |
| 10 | 20 | 25.0 ± 2.9 a | 25.0 ± 2.9 cd |
| 15 | 8 | 8.3 ± 1.7 b | 11.7 ± 1.7 e |
| 15 | 15 | 13.3 ± 1.7 b | 18.3 ± 3.3 de |
| 15 | 20 | 15.0 ± 5.0 b | 25.0 ± 2.9 cd |
| 20 | 8 | 13.3 ± 3.3 b | 30.0 ± 2.9 bc |
| 20 | 15 | 13.3 ± 1.7 b | 35.0 ± 2.9 ab |
| 20 | 20 | 13.3 ± 1.7 b | 40.0 ± 2.9 a |
| Significance | |||
| Running water rinsing | ns | ** | |
| 0.1% HgCl2 soaking | ** | ** | |
| Running water rinsing × 0.1% HgCl2 soaking | ns | ns | |
| VC (g·L−1) | Activated Charcoal (g·L−1) | Browning Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 58.3 ± 5.0 a |
| 0.5 | 2.0 | 31.7 ± 5.0 bcd |
| 0.5 | 3.0 | 33.3 ± 4.4 bc |
| 0.5 | 4.0 | 36.7 ± 5.0 b |
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 26.7 ± 1.7 cde |
| 1.0 | 3.0 | 8.3 ± 3.3 g |
| 1.0 | 4.0 | 13.3 ± 1.7 fg |
| 1.5 | 2.0 | 23.3 ± 1.7 de |
| 1.5 | 3.0 | 20.0 ± 2.9 ef |
| 1.5 | 4.0 | 25.0 ± 2.9 cde |
| Significance | ||
| VC | ** | |
| Activated charcoal | * | |
| VC × activated charcoal | * | |
| Medium | 2,4-D (mg·L−1) | TDZ (mg·L−1) | Induction Percentage (%) | Morphology of Induced Shoot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.7 ± 3.3 e | Light-yellowish shoots, short in height, with relatively small leaves |
| MS | 0.5 | 0.5 | 58.3 ± 4.4 cd | Green shoots with relatively short internodes |
| MS | 0.5 | 1.0 | 61.7 ± 2.9 bc | Pale-yellowish shoots with small leaves |
| MS | 1.0 | 0.5 | 80.0 ± 2.9 a | Green shoots showing relatively normal shoot development |
| MS | 1.0 | 1.0 | 70.0 ± 2.9 ab | Green shoots that appeared healthy |
| WPM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 ± 2.9 e | Light-green shoots, short in height, with elongated leaves |
| WPM | 0.5 | 0.5 | 48.3 ± 4.4 d | Light yellow shoots that appeared healthy |
| WPM | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0 ± 5.0 d | Green shoots with relatively small leaves |
| WPM | 1.0 | 0.5 | 61.7 ± 4.4 bc | Bright-green shoots that appeared healthy |
| WPM | 1.0 | 1.0 | 56.7 ± 4.4 bcd | Light-green shoots that appeared healthy |
| Significance | ||||
| Medium | ** | |||
| 2,4-D | ** | |||
| TDZ | ns | |||
| Medium × 2,4-D | ns | |||
| Medium × TDZ | ns | |||
| 2,4-D × TDZ | ns | |||
| Medium × 2,4-D × TDZ | ns | |||
| 2iP (mg·L−1) | NAA (mg·L−1) | Multiplication Percentage (%) | Morphology of Proliferated Shoot |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.0 c | Died gradually after inoculation |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 13.3 ± 3.3 b | Pale green, thin, and weak shoots |
| 1.0 | 0.5 | 20.0 ± 5.7 ab | Pale green with excessive callus, inhibiting proliferation |
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 23.3 ± 8.8 ab | Pale green, elongated shoots with poor vigor |
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 20.0 ± 5.8 ab | Light yellow with weak growth |
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 36.7 ± 8.8 a | Green with slow growth |
| 1.5 | 1.0 | 23.3 ± 3.3 ab | Dark red with small leaves and basal callus |
| 0.5 | 2.0 | 16.7 ± 3.3 b | Dark green, slow-growing, dwarf shoots |
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.3 ± 6.7 b | Light yellow with weak growth |
| 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 c | Callus formation without shoot proliferation |
| Significance | |||
| 2iP | ns | ||
| NAA | * | ||
| 2iP × NAA | ns | ||
| IBA (mg·L−1) | NAA (mg·L−1) | Rooting Percentage (%) | Average Root No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 20.0 ± 0.0 f | 3.0 ± 0.6 a |
| 400.0 | 500.0 | 23.3 ± 3.3 ef | 3.7 ± 0.3 a |
| 400.0 | 700.0 | 43.3 ± 3.3 cd | 4.8 ± 1.7 a |
| 400.0 | 900.0 | 46.7 ± 3.3 bc | 3.3 ± 0.6 a |
| 600.0 | 500.0 | 56.7 ± 8.8 b | 5.0 ± 1.0 a |
| 600.0 | 700.0 | 70.0 ± 5.8 a | 5.0 ± 0.6 a |
| 600.0 | 900.0 | 26.6 ± 3.3 ef | 4.5 ± 0.8 a |
| 800.0 | 500.0 | 40.0 ± 5.8 cd | 4.2 ± 0.6 a |
| 800.0 | 700.0 | 33.3 ± 3.3 de | 4.0 ± 0.0 a |
| 800.0 | 900.0 | 33.3 ± 3.3 de | 3.2 ± 1.7 a |
| Significance | |||
| IBA | ** | ns | |
| NAA | * | ns | |
| IBA × NAA | ** | ns | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Huang, X.-C.; Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Zuo, X.-F.; Chen, T.-G.; Cai, L.-Q.; Ouyang, L.; Qi, X.; Li, H. Rapid In Vitro Propagation of Quercus gilva via Nodal Explants: A Protocol for Culture Establishment, Shoot Proliferation, and Ex Vitro Rooting. Horticulturae 2026, 12, 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020241
Huang X-C, Zhou X, Liu L, Zuo X-F, Chen T-G, Cai L-Q, Ouyang L, Qi X, Li H. Rapid In Vitro Propagation of Quercus gilva via Nodal Explants: A Protocol for Culture Establishment, Shoot Proliferation, and Ex Vitro Rooting. Horticulturae. 2026; 12(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020241
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Xin-Cheng, Xia Zhou, Lian Liu, Xuan-Fang Zuo, Tian-Ge Chen, Long-Qing Cai, Lei Ouyang, Xin Qi, and He Li. 2026. "Rapid In Vitro Propagation of Quercus gilva via Nodal Explants: A Protocol for Culture Establishment, Shoot Proliferation, and Ex Vitro Rooting" Horticulturae 12, no. 2: 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020241
APA StyleHuang, X.-C., Zhou, X., Liu, L., Zuo, X.-F., Chen, T.-G., Cai, L.-Q., Ouyang, L., Qi, X., & Li, H. (2026). Rapid In Vitro Propagation of Quercus gilva via Nodal Explants: A Protocol for Culture Establishment, Shoot Proliferation, and Ex Vitro Rooting. Horticulturae, 12(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020241
