Next Article in Journal
Systemic Delivery of Oxytetracycline by Drill-Based and Drill-Free Trunk Injection for Treatment of Huanglongbing in Young Sweet Orange Trees
Previous Article in Journal
Domestication Has Reshaped Gene Families, Gene Expressions and Flavonoid Metabolites in Green Jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Physiological, Biochemical, and Microbial Community Traits of Michelia macclurei Seeds

1
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China
2
Yunfu Forest Farm of Guangdong Province, Yunfu 527300, China
3
School of Chemical Engineering & Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
4
Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(8), 975; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080975
Submission received: 5 July 2025 / Revised: 4 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 August 2025 / Published: 17 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Propagation and Seeds)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how storage temperature (25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, and −196 °C), drying duration (0, 1, 3, 5 days), and aril removal affect the physiological, biochemical, and microbial community traits of Michelia macclurei seeds. After one month of storage, physiological, biochemical, and microbial indexes were evaluated. Results showed that seeds dried for one day and stored at 4 °C had the highest vigor and germination rates. Storage at 4 °C or −196 °C significantly enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities and affected water content, soluble sugar, protein, malondialdehyde, and amylase levels. Principal component analysis confirmed that retaining arils and drying for 0~1 day before storage at −196 °C or 4 °C was optimal for maintaining seed quality. Microbial analysis revealed that low temperatures increased fungal diversity and bacterial diversity, though bacterial richness decreased compared to 25 °C storage. Ascomycota and Proteobacteria were dominant at the phylum level, while Penicillium and Rhodococcus were the dominant genera. Drying time and aril removal also influenced microbial structure. Overall, moderate drying and low-temperature storage, especially at 4 °C or −196 °C with arils retained, most effectively preserved seed vigor and shaped favorable microbial communities.

1. Introduction

Seed storage is integral to the development, utilization, and popularization of plant species. The maintenance of seed quality through diverse storage methodologies has been a pivotal area of focus within seed science research [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Temperature, water content rate, and humidity significantly impact seed quality during storage [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Detrimental storage conditions, such as elevated temperatures and high humidity, are often associated with declines in seed integrity, reduced germination rates, and viability [6,7,8]. Therefore, optimal storage conditions are essential for preserving seed quality throughout storage [9,10]. Previous studies have demonstrated significant interactions between storage temperature and duration in the preservation of Shorea robusta seeds, with gradual drying enhancing storage performance and extending seed longevity [11]. Seeds are susceptible to microbial infection during storage, which can serve as carriers for parasitization and reproduction, greatly influencing seed health. Small changes in temperature and humidity may encourage fungal proliferation, while inadequate drying prior to storage can elevate moisture content and diminish seed quality by promoting fungal growth [12]. For example, recalcitrant seeds like those of Avicennia marina are particularly vulnerable to fungal infections during storage [12].
Michelia macclurei Dandy, a member of the Magnoliaceae family, is an evergreen broad-leaved tree species known for its rapid growth, high yield, strong adaptability, and excellent forest fire resistance [13,14]. It is widely regarded as a high-quality afforestation species in Asia and North America [15,16], suitable for timber production, garden greening, and forest fire prevention [17]. However, the seeds of M. macclurei are recalcitrant and prone to rapid deterioration during storage. Studies indicate that after 20 days of storage at normal temperature, the germination rate of M. macclurei seeds can decline by 80% [18]. This rapid loss of viability severely limits the species’ exploitation and utilization.
Despite its ecological and economic importance, research on the scientific storage of M. macclurei seeds remains limited. The physiological and biochemical mechanisms underlying seed deterioration, as well as the role of microbial communities during storage, are poorly understood. Specifically, it is unclear how different storage conditions—such as temperature, drying duration, and aril retention—affect seed vigor, germination, and microbial dynamics. Addressing these gaps is critical for improving storage protocols and supporting the species’ broader application.
This study aims to evaluate the effects of different storage conditions on the physiological, biochemical, and microbial traits of M. macclurei seeds. We hypothesize that low-temperature storage, moderate drying, and aril retention will best preserve seed quality by maintaining high antioxidant enzyme activity, reducing oxidative stress, and fostering beneficial microbial communities. Our findings will provide a scientific basis for optimizing seed storage methods and enhancing the utilization of M. macclurei.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The M. macclurei seeds were collected from a 10-year-old tree planted in Yunfu Forest Farm of Guangdong province (112°16′ E, 22°76′ N), China, during 26–28 November 2018. The seeds with the same maturity were collected.

2.2. Experimental Design

After collection, the seeds were brought back to the laboratory and dried in a ventilated place. When the fruit shells cracked open, the seeds covered with arils were collected and dried in the fume hood of the laboratory at 25 °C (air volume 1000 m3/h) for physical and chemical characteristics analysis and seed storage test. The seeds were then stored under controlled conditions: at 25 °C in airtight containers with silica gel in a temperature-stable incubator (±0.5 °C, ~60% RH) (Haier Biomedical, Qingdao, China); at 4 °C in sealed plastic bags in a laboratory refrigerator (±1 °C, 60–70% RH); at −20 °C in a mechanical freezer (Haier, Qingdao, China); and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen at −196 °C (vapor-phase storage). Finally, the 24 combination treatments of seeds stored with different temperatures (25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, and −196 °C), after different drying time (0 day, 1 day, 3 days, and 5 days), and whether the arils were removed and the seeds were stored for one month or not were labeled as follows: T1, T2, T3, T4, …, T20 for experimental treatments and CK1, CK2, CK3, CK4 as control treatments. (Table 1). The control treatments (CK1, CK2, CK3, and CK4) corresponded to seeds dried for different durations (0, 1, 3, and 5 days, respectively) but measured immediately without storage or temperature treatment.

2.3. Determination of Seed Water Content Rate, Viability, and Germination Rate

Measurements of seed water content, germination rate, and viability were conducted both prior to storage and following one month of storage. The triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method was used to determine the viability of M. macclurei seeds [19]. After soaking, the seed coat was peeled off, and 1% TTC solution was added to just submerge the seeds. The seeds were kept warm in a 35 °C incubator for 1 h. After soaking in distilled water, the seed coat was peeled off, and 1% TTC solution was added to just submerge the seeds. Germination tests were conducted on M. macclurei seeds under different storage conditions [11]. The seeds were placed in 120 mm Petri dishes containing a germination medium of 0.8–1% agar and incubated in a light- and temperature-controlled growth chamber. The germination process was monitored daily for 30 days, during which germinated and moldy seeds were recorded and removed. Seed germination was defined as the emergence of the radicle. The water content of seeds was determined by measuring the weight difference before and after drying [20]. There were three replicates with 100 seeds per replicate.
Seed germination rate (GR) and water content rate (W) were calculated using the following formulas:
GR (%) = n/N × 100%,
where GR is the germination rate, n is the number of germinated seeds, and N is the total number of tested seeds.
W (%) = (G0 − G)/G0 × 100%,
where W is seed water content rate, G0 is seed air dry weight at normal temperature, and G is seed absolute dry weight after dried at 105 °C in an oven.

2.4. Determination of Soluble Sugar, Protein, MDA, and Enzyme Activity in Seeds

The phenol colorimetric method was used to determine the content of soluble sugar in the seeds of M. macclurei [21]. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the standard protein to determine the content of soluble protein in seeds by Coomassie brilliant blue colorimetry [22]. The content of MDA was determined by the thiobarbituric acid method [19]. The activity of SOD was determined using the nitrogen blue tetrazole photochemical reduction method [20]. The activity of POD was determined by the guaiacol method [19]. CAT activity was measured according to the Beers and Sizer’s methods [23]. The activity of AMY was determined by the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid method [24]. There were three replicates with 20 seeds per replicate.

2.5. Analysis of Seed Microbial Community

To investigate the microbial community composition of M. macclurei seeds, the groups with 20 samples under different treatments were selected for analysis. The 20 samples were divided into 4 groups according to different storage temperatures, namely Group1 (25 °C), Group2 (4 °C), Group3 (−20 °C) and Group4 (−196 °C), and the samples were also divided into 5 groups according to different treatments under the 4 storage temperatures, which were Group A (arils removed), Group B (dry for 0 days), Group C (dry for 1 day), Group D (dry for 3 days), and Group E (dry for 5 days). Genomic DNA from the 20 M. macclurei seed samples from each treatment was extracted using the CTAB method, and the extracted DNA was subsequently analyzed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequencing data were processed using QIIME2 (version 2021.4) and Mothur (version v.1.30.1).
The bacterial gene was amplified using primers 799F/1193R (799F: 5′-AAMGGATTAGATACCKG-3′; 1193R: 5′-ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC-3′) with barcode and adapter, while the fungal gene was amplified using primers ITS1F/ITS2R (ITS1F: 5′CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′; ITS2R: 5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCCGATGC-3′) with barcode and adapter. Amplicon sequencing libraries were constructed using a TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations, and index codes were added.
MiSeq sequencing generates double-ended sequence data [25]. Initially, pairs of reads were merged into single sequences based on the overlap between paired-end (PE) reads, and the quality of reads and the merging effect were quality-controlled and filtered. Subsequently, samples were differentiated based on the barcode and primer sequences at both ends of the sequences, and the sequence orientation was corrected. The OTU cluster analysis and species taxonomic analysis were performed following sample differentiation. Based on OTU cluster analysis results, multiple diversity index analyses and sequencing depth detection were carried out. Community structure statistics were then performed at various taxonomic levels based on the taxonomic information.
Based on OTU clustering and taxonomic annotation results, we employed a multidimensional analytical approach to evaluate treatment effects on seed microbial communities: (1) Chao1 (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Chao, accessed between 5 May 2021 and 20 June 2021) and ACE (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Ace, accessed between 5 May 2021 and 20 June 2021) indices for assessing community richness (total species number), (2) Shannon (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Shannon, accessed between 5 May 2021 and 20 June 2021) and Simpson (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Simpson, accessed between 5 May 2021 and 20 June 2021) indices for analyzing community diversity (species evenness), and (3) Good’s coverage (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Coverage, accessed between 5 May 2021 and 20 June 2021) for verifying sequencing depth (sample completeness).

2.6. Data Analysis

Microsoft Excel 2019 was utilized for statistical analysis, and SPSS 26.0 software was employed for ANOVA, Duncan Multiple Range Test for significance testing among treatments, principal component analysis (PCA), and membership function analysis (MFA).
Membership function values were calculated using the following formula:
U(Xj) = (Xj − Xmin)/(Xmax − Xmin)
where U(Xj) is the membership function value of the corresponding principal component, Xj is the comprehensive value, and Xmin and Xmax represent the minimum and maximum values of the corresponding comprehensive index across all varieties, respectively.
The weights and composite score are calculated using the following formula:
W j = P j / j = 0 n P j
where Wj is the weight of the corresponding comprehensive indicator in all comprehensive indicators, Pj is the contribution rate of a comprehensive indicator, and Fj is the score of each principal component.
The comprehensive evaluation value (D-value) was calculated using a method combining PCA and MFA, with the following formula:
D = j = 0 n ( U X j × W j )
where U(Xj) and Wj were mentioned above, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Response of Physiological and Biochemical Indexes to Storage Conditions

Storage conditions significantly influenced the physiological and biochemical properties of M. macclurei seeds (p < 0.05). Seeds stored at low temperatures (4 °C and −196 °C) retained higher moisture content (>20%) compared to those stored at 25 °C (<20%) (Figure 1a), likely due to reduced metabolic activity and slower dehydration at lower temperatures. Aril removal had no significant effect on moisture content.
Seed viability and germination rates declined sharply after one month of storage, but low-temperature storage (4 °C and −196 °C) mitigated this decline (Figure 1b,c). The highest viability (70.00%) and germination rate (43.33%) were observed at 4 °C, whereas seeds stored at 25 °C exhibited the poorest performance (viability: 26.67%; germination: 25.00%). Cryopreservation (−196 °C) maintained moderate viability (63.33%), possibly due to the suppression of oxidative damage and metabolic arrest under ultra-low temperatures. However, prolonged drying before storage reduced efficacy, suggesting an optimal drying window (e.g., 1 day at 4 °C). Notably, seeds with intact arils outperformed those without, implying a protective role of arils against desiccation stress.
Storage conditions significantly altered the biochemical profile of M. macclurei seeds (p < 0.05). Low-temperature storage (4 °C and −196 °C) induced marked accumulation of soluble sugars compared to higher temperatures (25 °C and −20 °C), with maximum contents reaching 1.39–1.40% (Figure 2a). This response likely represents a cryoprotective mechanism, as soluble sugars can stabilize membranes and proteins during cold stress. Drying pretreatment further enhanced sugar accumulation, particularly after 3 days of desiccation, while aril removal substantially reduced soluble sugar content (<1.00%). Suggesting arils may function as carbohydrate reserves or protect against sugar degradation.
Protein content exhibited an inverse pattern, decreasing significantly during storage (Figure 2b). Seeds preserved at 4 °C and −196 °C maintained higher protein levels (66.86–68.70 mg·g−1) than those at 25 °C (55.80 mg·g−1), indicating temperature-dependent protein degradation. Extended drying time progressively reduced protein content, with undried seeds showing 14–17% higher retention than those dried for 5 days. The protective effect of arils was again evident, as their removal led to 15–18% lower protein preservation.
MDA levels, an indicator of oxidative damage, increased during storage but showed temperature-dependent variation (Figure 2c). Surprisingly, seeds at 25 °C displayed the lowest MDA accumulation (2.59 μmol·L−1), while −20 °C storage resulted in the highest (3.31 μmol·L−1). This non-linear response suggests distinct oxidative stress mechanisms at different temperatures—possibly ice crystal damage at −20 °C versus metabolic oxidative stress at 25 °C. Optimal drying (1 day) minimized MDA formation, whereas aril removal exacerbated lipid peroxidation (peaking at 4.16 μmol·L−1).
Storage conditions significantly affected the enzymatic activities in M. macclurei seeds (p < 0.05). Low-temperature storage (4 °C and −196 °C) better preserved superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity compared to higher temperatures (25 °C and −20 °C), with maximum activities of 51.68–52.94 U·g−1 (Figure 3a). This temperature-dependent pattern suggests that cold conditions may help maintain the structural integrity of SOD enzymes. However, prolonged drying prior to storage progressively reduced SOD activity by up to 22%, indicating that excessive dehydration damages the antioxidant defense system. Notably, aril removal led to a 25% reduction in SOD activity, highlighting their protective role in maintaining enzymatic stability.
Peroxidase (POD) activity showed similar preservation at low temperatures, with peak activities of 31.69–34.33 μmol·g−1·min−1 at 4 °C and −196 °C (Figure 3b). The 28% higher POD activity in cryopreserved seeds compared to those at 25 °C suggests enhanced hydrogen peroxide detoxification under ultra-low temperatures. Drying treatments reduced POD activity in a time-dependent manner, while aril removal decreased activity by 18–22%, further emphasizing the importance of natural seed coverings for enzyme protection.
Catalase (CAT) activity declined during storage but remained 16–19% higher at 4 °C and −196 °C (77.46–76.49 μmol·g−1·min−1) than at 25 °C (64.87 μmol·g−1·min−1) (Figure 3c). The gradual 9% decrease in CAT activity with extended drying time suggests partial enzyme denaturation during dehydration. Aril removal exacerbated this effect, reducing CAT activity by 23% compared to intact seeds.
Amylase (AMY) activity demonstrated optimal preservation at −196 °C after 1 day of drying (6.96 mg·g−1·min−1), representing a 9.6% increase over 25 °C-stored seeds (Figure 3d). The non-linear response to drying duration (peaking at 1 day) indicates a narrow optimal dehydration window for maintaining metabolic enzyme function. Arils again proved essential, as their removal reduced AMY activity by 12%.

3.2. Principal Component Analysis on Different Treated Samples

To comprehensively evaluate the effects of different treatments on plant physiological indicators, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on 10 metrics (protein content, soluble sugar, SOD, POD, CAT, AMY, MDA, water content, viability, and germination rate). By calculating the correlation matrix and eigenvalue decomposition, three principal components (PC1, PC2, PC3) were extracted, accounting for 86.0% of the cumulative variance (Table 1). PC1 (48.2% variance contribution) primarily reflected the combined effects of antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, POD, CAT) and protein content; PC2 (21.5%) was strongly associated with germination rate and viability; while PC3 (12.3%) correlated with soluble sugar and water content (Table 2).
As shown in Figure 4 and Table 3, the principal component analysis revealed that treatments T6, T10, T8, and T12 ranked highest, with comprehensive scores of 2.12, 1.98, 1.89, and 1.76, respectively, while T1, T19, T17, and T3 showed the poorest performance. Notably, the top-performing treatments (T6, T10, T8, and T12) were all stored at either 4 °C or −196 °C, demonstrating that these storage temperatures provided better preservation efficacy than 25 °C or −20 °C. Additionally, the results suggest that shorter drying periods (0–1 day) prior to storage may be more beneficial for seed preservation compared to longer drying durations.

3.3. Response of Seed Microbial Community to Storage Conditions

This study systematically analyzed the microbial communities of M. macclurei seeds under different storage conditions. High-throughput sequencing yielded a total of 1,321,524 bacterial sequences and 1,257,918 fungal sequences. The results demonstrated that storage conditions significantly influenced the composition and diversity of seed-associated microbial communities, with these changes showing clear correlations with the physiological and biochemical indicators of the seeds.
The analysis of predominant fungi and bacteria in M. macclurei seeds was conducted at the levels of phylum, class, and genus, as depicted in Figure 5. At the phylum level, the abundance of OTUs belonging to Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Glomeromycota was ≥1% in at least one treatment, so these four phyla were the dominant phyla. The OTUs of the first three phyla covered more than 95% of all OTUs, indicating that Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, and Mortieromycetes were the dominant phyla. At the class level, all OTUs belonged to 15 dominant fungal classes, including Eurotiomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Tremellomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Agaricomycetes, etc. The OTUs of the first five fungal classes covered more than 90% of all OTUs, indicating that Eurotiomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Tremellomycetes, and Sordariomycetes were the dominant fungal classes. At the genus level, all OTUs belong to 89 dominant fungi genera, including Penicillium, Eremothecium, Cladosporium, Apiotrichum, Cutaneotrichosporon, Lasiodiplodia, Aspergillus, etc. Among them, the OTU of the first 10 fungal genera covered more than 60% of all OTUs, indicating that 10 fungal genera, including Penicillium, Pseudocystis, Cladosporium, Disporium, and Aspergillus, were the main dominant fungal genera. At the phylum level, the abundance of OTUs of 10 bacterial phyla was ≥1% in at least one treatment, including Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Desulphuricobacteria, etc., which were dominant bacterial phyla. Among them, OTUs belonging to the first three bacterial phyla covered more than 90% of all OTUs, indicating that Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutes were the main dominant bacterial phyla. At the class level, abundance of OTU in 13 bacterial classes was ≥1% in at least one treatment, including Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacilli, etc., which were dominant bacterial classes. Among them, the OTUs belonging to the first five bacterial classes covered more than 90% of all OTUs, indicating that Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Clostridia, Bacteroidia, and Alphaproteobacteria were the main dominant bacterial classes. At the genus level, the abundance of OTUs belonging to 62 bacterial genera was ≥1% in at least one treatment, including Rhodococcus, Ralstonia, Escherichia-Shigella, Bacteroides, Delftia, Burkholderia, Lelliottia, etc., which were dominant bacterial genera. Among them, OTUs belonging to the first 15 bacteria genera covered more than 60% of all OTUs, indicating that Rhodococcus, Ralstonia, Escherichia-Shigella, Bacteroides, Delftia, and 15 other bacteria genera were the main dominant bacteria genera.
Notably, in seeds stored at 25 °C, potential pathogenic genera, including Penicillium and Aspergillus, showed significantly higher relative abundances (Figure 5e), consistent with this group showing the lowest viability (26.7%, Figure 1b) and highest MDA content (Figure 2c). In contrast, seeds stored at 4 °C and −196 °C showed significantly increased abundance of Rhodococcus, a genus with potential probiotic functions (Figure 5f), which may partially explain the maintained high viability in these treatment groups.
Microbial diversity analysis (Table 4 and Table 5) revealed that seeds stored at low temperatures (4 °C and −196 °C) maintained higher microbial diversity. Specifically, seeds stored at 4 °C achieved Shannon indices of 3.17 and 3.66 for fungi and bacteria, respectively, significantly higher than the 25 °C storage group. This diversity advantage showed positive correlations with higher antioxidant enzyme activities (Figure 3a–d) and lower levels of membrane lipid peroxidation (Figure 2c). Furthermore, seeds with retained arils exhibited more balanced microbial community structures, with fungal diversity indices approximately 40% higher than those without arils, likely due to the physical protection and nutritional support provided by the arils.
The duration of drying treatment also significantly affected microbial communities. Short-term drying (1 day) helped maintain microbial community stability, while extended drying (5 days) led to decreased abundance of certain beneficial bacterial groups. For example, under −196 °C storage, seeds dried for 1 day showed 15% higher relative abundance of Rhodococcus compared to those dried for 5 days (Figure 5f), corresponding with their higher seed viability (63.3% vs. 50.0%).
These findings demonstrate that structural changes in seed microbial communities are closely related to storage conditions and may influence seed physiological status and storage longevity through multiple pathways. The optimal storage conditions (4 °C or −196 °C with arils retained and 1-day drying) not only helped maintain seed physiological functions but also promoted stability of beneficial microbial communities, thereby more effectively delaying seed aging processes.

4. Discussion

This study utilized the seeds of M. macclurei as experimental materials to investigate the impact of different storage conditions on seed deterioration and the associated characteristics of microbial communities. Previous research has indicated that seed viability decreases over time in storage, accompanied by a decline in germination rate [26,27,28]. Our findings corroborated these observations, revealing a significant and rapid decrease in both seed viability and germination rate during storage, consistent with trends observed in other plant seeds [29,30,31]. With the storage of seeds, the integrity of the cell membrane will gradually be lost [32]. As seeds age in storage, the integrity of their cell membranes deteriorates, affecting the absorption of substances such as water, as evidenced by our experimental results.
Studies on Oryza sativa and Brassica juncea seeds have demonstrated an initial increase in soluble sugar content followed by a gradual decrease over storage time, alongside a significant reduction in protein content [33,34]. Our findings align with these patterns, indicating similar trends in this experiment. Membrane lipid peroxidation, leading to the production of malondialdehyde (MDA), is a key factor contributing to seed viability decline [19]. Under normal circumstances, SOD, POD, and CAT present in seeds can remove free radicals and reactive oxygen species in seeds, delay seed aging, and maintain seed viability [35,36]. One of the main reasons for the loss of seed viability during storage is unsaturated fatty acid peroxidation caused by the decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity [37]. Furthermore, studies showed that AMY and MDA activities play crucial roles in seed aging. For instance, AMY activity of Populus seeds and POD activity of Pinus tabuliformis seeds decreased over storage time, while the MDA content of P. tabuliformis seeds significantly increases [38,39,40]. In this study, we observed a significant decrease in SOD, POD, CAT, AMY activity, and protein content after storage, coupled with a marked increase in MDA content. These results are consistent with previous experiments, underscoring the link between decreased enzyme activity, increased accumulation of toxic substances during seed storage, and subsequent declines in seed activity and germination rate.
Maintaining a specific moisture content, a temperature of 4 °C has been found to significantly prolong the storage duration of Magnoliaceae seeds to several months while preserving seed viability [41,42,43]. Conversely, the −20 °C condition is suboptimal for extending seed storage life. Seeds with high water content rate exhibit limited viability when stored in a −20 °C environment and cannot endure prolonged storage periods [44,45]. However, we observed that Magnolia ovata seeds, classified as having an intermediate storage type, exhibited no decline in viability after irregular drying in salt solution and subsequent storage at −20 °C for 3 months [44]. This underscores the critical role of seed cell behavior in determining the feasibility of long-term storage under low temperatures [46,47]. Ultra-low temperature storage (e.g., liquid nitrogen at −196 °C) has shown promising results for preserving recalcitrant seeds, aligning with findings from this study [45,48]. After 1 month of storage, significant differences in seed viability and germination rates were observed among seeds stored at different temperatures. Seeds stored at 4 °C and −196 °C exhibited the highest viability and germination rates, whereas those stored at −20 °C demonstrated lower germination rates. Interestingly, certain indicators displayed divergent patterns at −196 °C compared to other low temperatures, possibly due to the absence of lethal icing formation at −196 °C, warranting further investigation.
Seeds with arils were compared with those where arils had been removed. The results showed that seeds retaining arils typically germinated 2 to 4 weeks later than seeds without arils. However, no significant differences were observed in germination rate and quality between the two groups. In other words, the arils of M. macclurei did not adversely affect germination rates, although they did cause a certain degree of delay in germination. Zhao’s research on the impact of arils from Euonymus alatus, Euonymus maackii, and Celastrus orbiculatus on seed germination revealed no significant inhibitory effects [49]. Arils serve a protective role for seeds, shielding them from direct external harm and providing a buffer against abrupt environmental changes [49,50,51]. However, it should be noted that the protective effect of aril retention was only directly tested in non-dried seeds in this study. Future studies should examine whether this benefit persists across different drying durations to fully understand aril–seed moisture interactions during storage. This is particularly important given that the aril’s hypothesized moisture-regulating function may vary depending on the seed’s initial water status. In this study, seeds from which arils had been removed demonstrated significantly lower viability and germination rates compared to those with arils, and other physiological indices also showed poorer performance. This evidence suggests that arils can indeed offer some resistance to abrupt external environmental changes. During seed storage, arils help maintain higher levels of viability and germination potential.
It has been proven that seeds can disseminate the core microbial communities that are unique to plants [52], and the microorganisms transmitted via seeds can bestow vital functional traits upon plants during germination [53]. These traits have a direct bearing on the health and growth of seeds and hold significant potential for applications in enhancing seed germination rates, growth rate, and crop protection. Therefore, the preservation of seed-borne microorganisms during seed storage is an important aspect in determining the quality of stored seeds. In this study, the effects of different conditions of storage on the preservation of microorganisms of M. macclurei seeds were investigated. Extensive research has indicated that seed microorganisms can influence the growth and development of plants, either directly or indirectly. For example, endophytes isolated from Zea mays seeds had been found to produce a range of antibiotics and exhibit antagonistic effects against pathogens [54]. An endophytic bacterium within Oryza sativa seeds can fend off infections by pathogenic Burkholderia bacteria [55]. The seed microorganisms of Triticum aestivum can effectively inhibit the germination of winter spores of Tilletia controversa [56]. However, seed microorganisms may also exert negative effects on seed storage and germination, and some can induce diseases and mortality in plants [57]. In this study, a microbial community of M. macclurei seeds was found to be significantly affected by storage conditions, with the community structure undergoing substantial changes due to pre-storage treatments such as drying or aril removal, as well as varying storage temperatures. The findings suggest that alterations in the seed microbial community are likely associated with seed deterioration, and that microbial diversity is enhanced when seeds are at 4 °C and −196 °C. It is inferred that low-temperature storage may mitigate seed deterioration by safeguarding seed microbial diversity. Both Aspergillus and Penicillium fungi were known to induce mold decay in seeds [58,59]. The dominance of Aspergillus and Penicillium as fungal genera after 1 month of storage in this study implies that post-storage fungal infection could be an important reason for seed deterioration. However, the existing data are insufficient to discern other potential correlations between shifts in the seed microbial community and seed decay, necessitating further investigation. This study can provide some contributions to the subsequent related research.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the physiological, biochemical, and microbial community indices of the seeds stored under different conditions were determined. The seeds that underwent a 1-day drying period and were then stored at 4 °C exhibited the highest viability and germination rates. The seeds stored at both 4 °C and −196 °C demonstrated enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity. Principal component analysis showed that preserving arils and storing seeds at −196 °C or 4 °C following 0~1 day drying could effectively reduce deterioration during storage. Low-temperature storage, shade drying prior to storage, and retention of arils were found to be effective in reducing the deterioration of stored seeds. This paper also examined the richness and diversity of seed microbial communities, as well as the abundance of dominant bacteria at the phylum, class, and genus levels. After 1 month of storage, Ascomycota and Proteobacteria emerged as predominant bacterial phyla. At the genus level, Penicillium and Rhodococcus were dominant fungal and bacterial genera, respectively. The diversity and richness of bacteria in seeds post-drying were found to be higher compared to non-dried seeds, while the diversity of fungi was lower in dried seeds. Following low-temperature treatment, both diversity and richness of fungi and bacteria were higher than those in seeds stored at 25 °C. However, the richness of bacteria was found to be lower than that in seeds stored at 25 °C. When arils were removed, diversity and richness of bacteria increased compared to seeds with arils, while diversity and richness of fungi decreased. The findings suggest that preserving arils and storing seeds at −196 °C or 4 °C after a 1-day drying period were the most beneficial to seed preservation.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, S.T. and H.X.; Investigation, S.T., S.Z. and B.L.; Project administration, Q.J.; Resources, H.C.; Supervision, Q.J.; Writing—original draft, S.T.; Writing—review and editing, Z.C. and C.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Project (grant number 2025KJCX006) and the Guangxi Self-funded Forestry Science and Technology Project (grant number 2024GXZCLK02).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pradhan, B.K.; Badola, H.K. Seed germination response of populations of Swertia chirayita [(Roxb. ex Fleming) H. Karst] following periodical storage. Seed Technol. 2008, 30, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pradhan, B.K.; Badola, H.K. Effect of storage conditions and storage periods on seed germination in eleven populations of Swertia chirayita: A critically endangered medicinal herb in Himalaya. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 128105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gianella, M.; Balestrazzi, A.; Ravasio, A.; Mondoni, A.; Börner, A.; Guzzon, F. Comparative seed longevity under genebank storage and artificial ageing: A case study in heteromorphic wheat wild relatives. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Trusiak, M.; Plitta-Michalak, B.P.; Michalak, M. Choosing the right path for the successful storage of seeds. Plants 2022, 12, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mamedi, A.; Sharifzadeh, F.; Maali-Amiri, R.; Divargar, F. Physiological and biological responses of Ca2+-primed Quinoa seed longevity stored at different hermetic storage conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 1967–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nazreen, S.; Khan, B.R.; Mohmand, A.S. The effect of storage temperature, storage period and seed moisture content on seed viability of soybean. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2000, 3, 2003–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hezewijk, M.V.; Beem, A.V.; Verkleij, J.A.C.; Pieterse, A.H. Germination of Orobanche crenata seeds, as influenced by conditioning temperature and period. Can. J. Bot. 1993, 71, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Müller, E.; Cooper, E.J.; Alsos, I.G. Germinability of arctic plants is high in perceived optimal conditions but low in the field. Botany 2011, 89, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Butola, J.S.; Badola, H.K. Seed germination improvement using chemicals in Heracleum candicans Wall, a threatened medicinal herb of Himalaya. Indian For. 2004, 130, 565–572. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, S.Y.; Kuo, S.R.; Chien, C.T. Storage behaviour of seeds of Cinnamomum osmophloeum and Neolitsea aciculata var. variabillima (Lauraceae). Seed Sci. Technol. 2007, 35, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferguson, J.M. AOSA perspective of seed vigor testing. J. Seed Technol. 1993, 17, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  12. Anguelova-merhar, V.S.; Calistru, C.; Berjak, P. A study of some biochemical and histopathological responses of wet-stored recalcitrant seeds of Avicennia marina infected by Fusarium moniliforme. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang, Q.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Pinyopusarerk, K.; Bush, D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced growth of Magnolia macclurei (Dandy) Figlar seedlings grown under glasshouse conditions. For. Sci. 2017, 63, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Liao, L.N.; Yang, H.P.; Huang, Y.Z.; He, A.J.; Ye, S.M. Spatial pattern of artificial mixed forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei. J. Southwest. For. Univ. 2020, 40, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, J.; Chen, H.; Li, G.; Jumaturti, M.A.; Yao, X.; Hu, Y. Phylogenetics study to compare chloroplast genomes in four Magnoliaceae species. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 9234–9251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, S.; Wei, B.; Fu, Y. A study of the chemical composition and biological activity of Michelia macclurei Dandy heartwood: New sources of natural antioxidants, enzyme inhibitors and bacterial inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lan, X.; Liang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Yu, G. Biological characteristics of Michelia macclurei Dandy and its utilization prospects. Guangxi Agric. Sci. 2010, 41, 253–255. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fang, X.Y.; Shen, W.H. Effect of natural dehydration of Michelia macclurei seeds on germination rate. Contemp. Hortic. 2021, 44, 14–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jia, J.; Ma, H. Storage time affects the viability, longevity, and germination of Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth Seeds. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feng, J.; Shen, Y.; Shi, F.; Li, C. Changes in seed germination ability, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities of Ginkgo biloba seed during desiccation. Forests 2017, 8, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buysse, J.A.N.; Merckx, R. An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 1627–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Beers, R.F.; Sizer, I.W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 195, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, M.; Tan, B.; Xu, J.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Tang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W. Priming methods affected deterioration speed of primed rice seeds by regulating reactive oxygen species accumulation, seed respiration and starch degradation. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1267103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ravi, R.K.; Walton, K.; Khosroheidari, M. MiSeq: A Next Generation Sequencing Platform for Genomic Analysis. In Disease Gene Identification: Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yan, H.F.; Xia, F.S.; Mao, P. Research progress of seed aging and vigor repair. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull 2014, 30, 20–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Mira, S.; Estrelles, E.; González-Benito, M.E. Effect of water content rate and temperature on seed longevity of seven Brassicaceae species after 5 years of storage. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liava, V.; Ntatsi, G.; Karkanis, A. Seed germination of three milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.) populations of Greek origin: Temperature, duration, and storage conditions effects. Plants 2023, 12, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, J.H. Vitality of tomato seeds during storage. Beijing Agric. Sci. 1999, 17, 24–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, X.; He, C.; Luo, F.; Xu, W.; Duan, X. Effects of hydro-priming on the vigor of Setaria sphacelate cv. Narok’s seeds in different storage period. Chin. J. Grassl. 2017, 39, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Attri, P.; Ishikawa, K.; Okumura, T.; Koga, K.; Shiratani, M.; Mildaziene, V. Impact of seed color and storage time on the radish seed germination and sprout growth in plasma agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, Q.; Jiang, X.C. Study on storage and germination characteristics of Impatiens seeds. China Seed Ind. 2007, 8, 47–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Cai, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xie, H. Preliminary study on physiological characteristics for rice seed after aging. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 27, 1061–1066. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Long, J.; Zheng, Q.; Yang, Z.; Hao, L.; Zhang, F.; Chang, R.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y. Effect of seed longevity and storage material in Pugionium Gaertn at Different storage years. Seed 2017, 36, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Rui, H. Study on the relationship between malondialdehyde content and stress resistance in different alfalfa varieties. Heilongjiang Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2008, 8, 53–54. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  36. Lie, G.W.; Ye, L.H.; Xue, L. Effects of ozone stress on major plant physiological functions. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dobiesz, M.; Piotrowicz-Cieślak, A.I.; Michalczyk, D.J. Physiological and biochemical parameters of lupin seed subjected to 29 years of storage. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 2149–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, G.H. A brief discussion on the key issues of seed storage. Seed 1984, 4, 46–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Chang, H.; Zhang, F.; Yang, Z.; Kong, D.; Zheng, Q.; Hao, L. Physiological and biochemical responses of Allium mongolicum seeds to storage aging. Plant Physiol. J. 2015, 51, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hao, Y.C. The effect of storage time on characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis seed germination and physiological changes. Prot. For. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 34–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Dickie, J.B.; Ellis, R.H.; Kraak, H.L.; Ryder, K.; Tompsett, P.B. Temperature and seed storage longevity. Ann. Bot. 1990, 65, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, C.; Long, C. Seed dormancy, germination and storage behavior of Magnolia wilsonii (Magnoliaceae), an endangered plant in China. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 2010, 32, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, C.Y.; Sun, W.B. Seed storage behaviour of Magnolia odoratissima. Seed Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. José, A.C.; Da Silva, E.A.A.; Davide, A.C.; Melo, A.J.S.; Toorop, P.E. Effects of drying rate and storage time on Magnolia ovata Spreng. seed viability. Seed Sci. Technol. 2011, 39, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Walters, C.; Berjak, P.; Pammenter, N.; Kennedy, K.; Raven, P. Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science 2013, 339, 915–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Berjak, P.; Pammenter, N.W. From Avicennia to Zizania: Seed recalcitrance in perspective. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Walters, C.; Wesley-Smith, J.; Crane, J.; Hill, L.M.; Chmielarz, P.; Pammenter, N.W.; Berjak, P. Cryopreservation of recalcitrant (i.e., Desiccation-Sensitive) Seeds. In Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide; Reed, B.M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Norman, M.N.; Chin, H.F.; Hor, Y.L. Desiccation and cryopreservation of embryonic axes of Hevea brasiliensis. Pertanike 1986, 9, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhao, W. Study on Components and Function of the Aril and Sarcotesta in Seven Plants. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China, 2015. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim, S.I.; Roh, J.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, H.S.; Ahn, Y.J. Insecticidal activities of aromatic plant extracts and essential oils against Sitophilus oryzae and Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2003, 39, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, X.; Mantri, N.; Ge, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.; Lu, J.; Jiang, W.; Lu, H. Inhibition of plant pathogens in vitro and in vivo with essential oil and organic extracts of Torreya grandis Merrilli aril. Plant Omics 2014, 7, 337–344. [Google Scholar]
  52. Berg, G.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Saving seed microbiomes. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1167–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Torres-Cortés, G.; Bonneau, S.; Bouchez, O.; Genthon, C.; Briand, M.; Jacques, M.A.; Barret, M. Functional microbial features driving community assembly during seed germination and emergence. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, F.; Zhang, R.; Wu, X.; Xu, T.; Ahmad, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y. An endophytic strain of the genus Bacillus isolated from the seeds of maize (Zea mays L.) has antagonistic activity against maize pathogenic strains. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 142, 104074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Matsumoto, H.; Fan, X.; Wang, Y.; Kusstatscher, P.; Duan, J.; Wu, S.; Chen, S.; Qiao, K.; Wang, Y.; Ma, B.; et al. Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ren, Z.; Chen, A.J.; Zong, Q.; Du, Z.; Guo, Q.; Liu, T.; Chen, W.; Gao, L. Microbiome signature of endophytes in wheat seed response to wheat dwarf bunt caused by Tilletia controversa Kühn. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e00390-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, J.B. The Study of Bacterial Abundance and Community Structure in Rice Seeds and Their Influencing Factors. Master’s Thesis, Hebei University, Baoding, China, 2023. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, Y.; Lu, J.X.; Fan, H.D.; Li, C.H. Separation, purification and initiative identification of mildew bacteria from mildew dry jujube. J. Northwest Univ. Natl. (Nat. Sci.) 2012, 6, 75–80. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  59. Yang, S.X.; Liu, J.X.; Jiang, Y. Preliminary study on mildew mechanism of peanut seeds. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2020, 59, 72. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Response of seed water content rate, viability, and germination rate to storage conditions. (a) Water content rate; (b) viability; (c) germination rate. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of the figure column represent the control group stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively. The same as below.
Figure 1. Response of seed water content rate, viability, and germination rate to storage conditions. (a) Water content rate; (b) viability; (c) germination rate. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of the figure column represent the control group stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively. The same as below.
Horticulturae 11 00975 g001
Figure 2. Response of seed soluble sugar, protein, and malondialdehyde to storage conditions (a) Soluble sugar content; (b) protein content; (c) MDA content. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of figure columns represent the treatments stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively.
Figure 2. Response of seed soluble sugar, protein, and malondialdehyde to storage conditions (a) Soluble sugar content; (b) protein content; (c) MDA content. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of figure columns represent the treatments stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively.
Horticulturae 11 00975 g002
Figure 3. Response of enzyme activity to storage conditions. (a) SOD, (b) POD, (c) CAT, and (d) AMY. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of the figure column represent the group stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively.
Figure 3. Response of enzyme activity to storage conditions. (a) SOD, (b) POD, (c) CAT, and (d) AMY. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different groups at the same temperature, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different temperatures within groups (p < 0.05). The five different colors of the figure column represent the group stored at 25 °C, 4 °C, −20 °C, −196 °C, and CK, respectively.
Horticulturae 11 00975 g003
Figure 4. Comprehensive performance of treatments based on weighted PCA.
Figure 4. Comprehensive performance of treatments based on weighted PCA.
Horticulturae 11 00975 g004
Figure 5. Dominant bacterial content in microbial communities at three levels. (a) Dominant bacteria content of fungi at the phylum level; (b) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the phylum level; (c) dominant bacteria content of fungi at the class level; (d) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the class level; (e) dominant bacteria content of fungi at the genus level; (f) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the genus level.
Figure 5. Dominant bacterial content in microbial communities at three levels. (a) Dominant bacteria content of fungi at the phylum level; (b) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the phylum level; (c) dominant bacteria content of fungi at the class level; (d) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the class level; (e) dominant bacteria content of fungi at the genus level; (f) dominant bacteria content of bacteria at the genus level.
Horticulturae 11 00975 g005
Table 1. Treatment of test materials.
Table 1. Treatment of test materials.
Treatment CodeTemperature (°C)Dry (Day)Arils RemovedStorage (Month)
T1250yes1
T240yes1
T3−200yes1
T4−1960yes1
T5250no1
T640no1
T7−200no1
T8−1960no1
CK1250no0
T9251no1
T1041no1
T11−201no1
T12−1961no1
CK2251no0
T13253no1
T1443no1
T15−203no1
T16−1963no1
CK3253no0
T17255no1
T1845no1
T19−205no1
T20−1965no1
CK4255no0
Note: 25 °C is the normal temperature.
Table 2. Principal components eigenvectors and cumulative contribution rates.
Table 2. Principal components eigenvectors and cumulative contribution rates.
IndicatorPrin.1Prin.2Prin.3
Viability0.4230.812−0.102
Germination0.4560.7920.056
Water content rate0.3120.7560.412
Soluble sugar0.765−0.3120.412
Protein0.8920.102−0.212
MDA−0.7820.4120.102
SOD0.8430.325−0.102
POD0.912−0.1230.056
CAT0.8760.156−0.312
AMY0.801−0.2120.301
Eigenvalues4.822.151.23
Variance contribution rate (%)48.2021.5012.3
Cumulative contribution rate (%)48.2069.7082.00
Table 3. Top five treatments by comprehensive score.
Table 3. Top five treatments by comprehensive score.
TreatmentPC1 ScorePC2 ScorePC3 ScoreComposite Score (F)Rank
T62.451.780.562.121
T102.122.010.451.982
T82.231.450.671.893
T121.981.670.521.764
T71.671.230.451.455
Table 4. Representative sequences of different samples and population diversity.
Table 4. Representative sequences of different samples and population diversity.
MicrobeSamplesSequence NumberIndex of DiversityCoverage
Shannon IndexSimpson Index ACE IndexChao Index
FungiT1671230.340 0.81731.4 14.0 0.99994
T2731501.800 0.31257.2 56.5 0.99997
T3586811.871 0.31975.0 75.0 1.00000
T4671353.565 0.051105.4 105.0 0.99999
T5578880.016 0.99720.3 20.0 0.99998
T6625043.315 0.05751.4 50.0 0.99998
T7633863.547 0.07396.1 93.5 0.99997
T8578182.891 0.11239.8 39.0 0.99998
T9575493.088 0.115100.4100.0 0.99998
T10512343.029 0.07035.035.0 1.00000
T11677803.284 0.0640.0 76.0 0.99994
T12593722.826 0.14568.9 69.0 0.99997
T13728690.052 0.98968.1 66.5 0.99986
T14625553.259 0.094113.2 113.0 0.99998
T15701141.5550.540123.4 123.5 0.99996
T16574913.130 0.06441.0 40.0 0.99998
T17506273.454 0.03750.8 48.0 0.99994
T18651713.368 0.073151.3 151.0 0.99999
T19673470.027 0.99478.8 60.1 0.99969
T20681243.598 0.05588.4 88.0 0.99999
BacteriaT1670793.9730.047528.9521.2 0.99869
T2660371.1090.479252.3211.9 0.99920
T3666844.0830.047370.8347.3 0.99966
T4644104.0070.047295.5287.3 0.99958
T5691093.3340.088311.1242.0 0.99961
T6703484.0690.040301.5311.5 0.99973
T7710633.8100.054324.0329.1 0.99972
T8488884.2010.040392.0407.6 0.99928
T9547863.1220.130201.4204.5 0.99987
T10614123.0860.125192.0175.8 0.99977
T11714242.7570.213220.3222.0 0.99989
T12619913.4280.100284.0267.2 0.99963
T13497683.5110.073354.2365.2 0.99888
T14615433.4490.080346.4334.1 0.99899
T15526883.2400.122343.6352.0 0.99922
T16541092.9800.130235.6237.4 0.99946
T17550833.1690.101277.3285.9 0.99942
T18673863.7470.059306.4288.3 0.99963
T19573953.8330.049264.3269.0 0.99974
T20424903.2360.100213.2208.8 0.99958
Table 5. The average value of sample diversity index in each group.
Table 5. The average value of sample diversity index in each group.
MicrobeGroupIndex of Diversity
Shannon IndexSimpson IndexACE IndexChao Index
FungiGroup 11.5190.49957.954.1
Group 23.1740.08664.563.5
Group 32.1950.36774.789.6
Group 42.7150.24582.177.4
Group A2.5170.25031.045.0
Group B2.9070.14268.266.8
Group C2.0450.37483.682.9
Group D2.4850.31499.494.5
Group E2.0500.41666.866.6
BacteriaGroup 13.3010.142351.7321.9
Group 23.6580.078282.2285.7
Group 33.2770.118309.7308.1
Group 43.3930.088259.4257.9
Group A3.4450.107321.6323.0
Group B2.8790.184284.4273.5
Group C3.8850.055355.8352.1
Group D3.6030.077276.9273.7
Group E3.2240.109265.2244.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, S.; Chen, Z.; Li, B.; Xue, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Qu, C.; Jiang, Q. Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Physiological, Biochemical, and Microbial Community Traits of Michelia macclurei Seeds. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080975

AMA Style

Tian S, Chen Z, Li B, Xue H, Zhang S, Chen H, Qu C, Jiang Q. Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Physiological, Biochemical, and Microbial Community Traits of Michelia macclurei Seeds. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(8):975. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Shenghui, Zhaoli Chen, Baojun Li, Haoyue Xue, Shida Zhang, Haijun Chen, Chao Qu, and Qingbin Jiang. 2025. "Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Physiological, Biochemical, and Microbial Community Traits of Michelia macclurei Seeds" Horticulturae 11, no. 8: 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080975

APA Style

Tian, S., Chen, Z., Li, B., Xue, H., Zhang, S., Chen, H., Qu, C., & Jiang, Q. (2025). Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Physiological, Biochemical, and Microbial Community Traits of Michelia macclurei Seeds. Horticulturae, 11(8), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop