Next Article in Journal
Proximal and Remote Sensing Monitoring of the ‘Spinoso sardo’ Artichoke Cultivar on Organic and Conventional Management
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Tomato SET Domain Group Gene Family and Function Analysis Under Temperature Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Potential Postharvest Treatments to Delay Flower Senescence and Improve Botrytis Resistance in Cut Peony Flowers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Cardboard Box Ventilation Hole Size During Forced-Air Precooling on Postharvest Quality and Physiological Properties in Cut Roses

by
Ruifeng Gu
1,
Jie Bai
1,
Jiawei Sun
1,
Lei Li
1,
Xuan Wang
1,
Huijun Yan
2,
Hao Zhang
2,
Wensheng Wang
3,
Junping Gao
1 and
Xiaoming Sun
1,2,*
1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Development and Quality Control of Ornamental Crops, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Flower Research Institute of Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
3
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Agricultural Products, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Preservation of Agricultural Products (Tianjin), Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300384, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(8), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080959 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 10 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025

Abstract

Forced-air cooling (FAC) is a method for rapidly reducing the temperature of horticultural products. However, its effects on the physiological properties and quality of cut flowers remain elusively unclear. This study investigated the impact of FAC with different vent hole diameters (4, 8, and 12 cm) on multiple metabolic pathways and the quality of cut rose flowers. Compared with controls with a conventional slow cooling method, FAC using 8 cm vent holes (FAC8) prolonged the vase life of cut roses by 3 days and reduced Botrytis cinerea incidence by 60%. The data revealed that FAC8 suppressed excessive transpiration in the late vase stages while it enhanced water uptake throughout the vase period. Additionally, FAC8 reduced the respiratory rate in cut roses, decreasing cumulative respiration by 15% versus controls. When detached leaves from cut roses were subjected to water loss treatment, FAC8 induced tighter stomatal closure, resulting in a 33% smaller stomatal aperture than that of controls after 2 h. Correlation analysis of measured indices demonstrated that FAC significantly contributed to the improvement of postharvest quality (p < 0.05) via the regulation of physiological properties. In conclusion, FAC enhances the postharvest quality of cut roses by maintaining stomatal regulatory ability.

1. Introduction

The rose (Rosa hybrida) is the world’s most widely-traded cut flower [1]. Cut roses possess extremely high ornamental and economic value [2]. The flower opening and senescence of roses are regulated by multiple factors [3]. After being harvested, cut flowers carry a large amount of field heat, which accelerates their senescence [4]. Once cut flowers are packaged, heat will accumulate within the limited packaging space, making it difficult for cut flowers to cool down [5]. Particularly since the cooling capacity of transport vehicles is limited, packaged cut flowers seldom achieve effective cooling during transit [6].
Forced-air cooling (FAC) allows cold air to rapidly pass through the packaging boxes through the suction effect [7], and it is widely utilized for the postharvest treatment of fruits and vegetables due to its high cooling capacity, rapid cooling speed, and low energy consumption [8]. It is also the most common and effective method for precooling cut flowers [8] and is especially an optimal precooling method for bundled packaged cut flowers [9].
For fruits and vegetables, FAC delays deterioration in appearance, texture, flavor, and nutritional quality [10,11]. In kiwifruit, it slows the loss of freshness and hardness [12]. In litchi, FAC mitigates declines in soluble solids content and anthocyanin levels [13]. For nectarines, mangoes, and apricots, it retards decreases in peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid content, and levels of other bioactive compounds, thereby delaying cellular senescence [10,14,15,16]. In broccoli, FAC attenuates the loss of antioxidant enzyme activity, preserving marketable quality [14].
The vase life of cut flowers is governed by complex metabolic processes [17,18]. Mitigating transpirational water loss is crucial for maintaining freshness [19,20], while preserving water uptake capacity delays wilting [21,22]. Cut flowers exhibiting a lower respiratory rate generally demonstrate extended vase life [23]. Stomata, functioning as regulators of plant physiological activity, coordinate gas exchange and transpiration, thereby influencing interconnected processes such as respiration, water transport, and water loss [24,25,26,27]. Variations in vase life under dehydration stress and longevity following cold storage are linked to the stomatal regulatory capacity for transpiration [19,28]. FAC has been shown to prolong vase life [29]; however, the underlying physiological and metabolic mechanisms of FAC action in cut flowers remain poorly understood.
Here, we aim to investigate the effect of FAC on the physiological metabolism and quality of cut rose flowers. We found that FAC prolongs the vase life of cut roses by influencing transpiration and respiration mainly through the regulation of stomatal aperture. Our findings elucidate the metabolic mechanisms underlying FAC-mediated vase life. They provide important guidance for optimizing other precooling technical parameters in cut flowers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. FAC Device

The experiment employed a custom-built FAC device composed of an axial flow fan, a fan speed controller, a static pressure chamber, and a canvas. The axial flow fan operated at 220 V, with an air volume of 14,900 m3·h−1, a power rating of 550 W, and a rotational speed of 2800 rpm. The fan speed controller had an input voltage of 220 V and an output voltage ranging from 0 to 220 V. The static pressure chamber, constructed from tung wood, had internal dimensions of 1 m (length) × 0.9 m (width) × 1 m (height). The canvas served to seal the flower boxes, preventing airflow bypass during FAC treatment.

2.2. Plant Material and Treatments

The cut flowers used in this study were obtained from the cultivation base of Zhihui Horticulture Technology Co., Ltd. (Kunming, Yunnan, China). Vigorous pest- and disease-free cut roses (Rosa hybrida ‘Peach Avalanche’) harvested at commercial opening stage 3 [30] were selected for experiments.
After harvest, the cut roses were immediately transferred to the postharvest processing workshop. A fungicidal spray against Botrytis cinerea was applied (excluding flowers monitored for B. cinerea symptoms), followed by commercial packaging. Roses designated for FAC were packed in 0.3 cm thick single-wall corrugated cardboard boxes (100 cm × 45 cm × 20 cm) with mechanically-cut ventilation holes of nominal 4 cm, 8 cm, or 12 cm diameter (actual diameter tolerance: ±0.2 cm). The control group was packed in boxes with mechanically-cut 4 cm diameter holes (4 cm being the industry benchmark aperture). Each box contained 12 bunches (10 stems/bunch), arranged in a staggered configuration. All packed flowers were transferred to a cold storage room maintained at 2 °C (2 °C being the standard commercial rose storage temperature [5]). For FAC treatment, boxes were positioned adjacent to the mobile FAC unit. The fan speed was maintained at 2 m·s−1 at box inlets throughout the fixed 2 h FAC treatment period, with actual cooling times to reach 8 °C simulated transport temperature (8 °C being a commercial transport temperature for roses [6]) being treatment dependent (see Figure S1). The control group employed the slow control cooling methodology and was positioned at least 3 m away from the FAC device to prevent any potential influence of accelerated airflow from the FAC unit. This configuration ensured that cooling in the control group occurred solely through gradual inward diffusion of cold air, achieving passive temperature reduction in cut flowers.
After precooling, the cut roses designated for stomatal analysis were transported within 30 min to the postharvest evaluation room at the National Phosphorus Resource Development and Utilization Research Center (Kunming, Yunnan, China). The room was maintained at 24 ± 1 °C and 70 ± 5% relative humidity, with 15 μmol·m−2·s−1 photosynthetic photon flux density provided by light-emitting diode lighting under a 16 h photoperiod. Stem bases were trimmed underwater to a length of 50 cm, retaining leaves distal to the third pentafoliate node and removing basal foliage. Five stems per vase were placed in 1 L of deionized water for a 12 h light period rehydration prior to stomatal function assessment.
Additional cut roses for phenotypic and physiological assessments during the vase holding period were transferred to an adjacent cold storage chamber (6–8 °C) for 4 day simulated transport. At the beginning and end of simulated transportation, the fresh weight of the packaged cut roses was measured in cold storage. After simulated transport, the cut roses were transferred without hydration within 30 min to the aforementioned controlled-environment room. Stem bases were trimmed underwater to 50 cm, retaining leaves distal to the third pentafoliate node after basal foliage removal. Stems were placed in 1 L of a 150 mg·L−1 8-hydroxyquinoline solution (5 stems per vase) for vase life evaluation and physiological indicator monitoring.

2.3. Airflow Rate

At the start of FAC, an anemometer probe was positioned perpendicular to the airflow direction at the geometric center of the packaging box inlet vent to measure air velocity. This value represented inlet air velocity (vin). The airflow rate at the packaging inlet was calculated as follows:
Q in   =   A in   ×   v in   1000
where Qin is the airflow rate at inlet (L·s−1), Ain is the cross-sectional area of inlet vent (cm2), vin is the air velocity at inlet (cm·s−1), and 1000 is the unit conversion factor (cm3·s−1 to L·s−1).

2.4. Cooling Rate

After commercial packaging, temperature/humidity sensor probes were inserted into floral tissues at mid-height positions on both inlet and outlet sides of packaging boxes to monitor rose temperature during precooling and simulated transport. Using recorded temperature profiles, the average cooling rate (ACR, °C h−1) was calculated as follows:
ACR   =   T i     T f   t
where Ti is the initial temperature of cut roses before precooling (°C), Tf is the target transport temperature (8 °C), and t is the time elapsed until core temperature of cut roses reached 8 °C (h).

2.5. Fresh Weight Loss Rate of Cut Roses

The fresh weight loss rate (FWLR, %) of cut roses during simulated transport was calculated as follows:
FWLR   =   FW i     FW f   FW i     W pa × 100
where FWi is the initial fresh weight of cut roses at the start of simulated transport (g), FWf is the final fresh weight of cut roses at the end of simulated transport (g), and Wpa is the weight of the packaging materials used for commercial packaging (g).

2.6. Leaf Relative Water Content, Transpiration Rate, and Stomatal Aperture of Cut Roses

Following full rehydration, the third pentafoliate leaf (from the floral apex) was excised per treatment replicate. Its fresh weight was recorded as saturated weight (SW, g). Leaves underwent controlled dehydration (24 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% relative humidity) with fresh weights recorded at 20 min intervals. Dry weight (DW, g) was determined after oven-drying at 70 °C for ≥24 h.
Leaf relative water content (RWC, %) and transpiration rate (TRleaf, mmol·m−2·s−1) were calculated as follows:
RWC   =   FW     DW   SW     DW   ×   100
TR leaf =   ( W t 1   W t 2 )   ×   55.51 A   ×   ( t 1 t 2 )
where FW is the fresh weight at measurement (g); Wt1 and Wt2 are the leaf weights at times t1 and t2 (g), respectively; A is the leaf area (m2); t2t1 is the time interval between measurements (s); and 55.51 is the molar mass conversion factor (converting g H2O to mmol H2O).
Stomatal morphology was examined after 2 h dehydration using microscopic analysis. Aperture assessment employed the epidermal imprint technique. A thin layer of neutral balsam was applied to the abaxial leaf surface using a clean brush. After polymerization, the film was excised with forceps, mounted on glass slides, and imaged using bright-field microscopy. Six stomata per leaf were randomly selected and measured for pore length (Lp) and width (Wp) using ImageJ 1.54k (NIH). The stomatal aperture index was calculated as Wp/Lp.

2.7. Water Uptake and Transpiration Rates of Cut Roses

At designated time points during vase holding, the total weight of the vase system (Wtotal, comprising the vase, solution, and cut flowers) was measured using an analytical balance. Immediately after this measurement, the flowers were removed, and the vase containing the residual solution was weighed (Wres). The fresh weight of cut flowers was calculated as FW = WtotalWres.
Water uptake rate (WUR, g H2O·g−1·d−1) and transpiration rate (TRflower, g H2O·g−1·d−1) were calculated as follows:
WUR   =     W res,p     W res,c   FW p   ×   t
TR flower = ( W res,p W res,c )     ( FW c FW p )   FW p   ×   t
where Wres,c is the Wres on the current measurement day (g), Wres,p is the Wres on the previous day (g), FWc is the FW on the current day (g), FWp is the FW on the previous day (g), and t is 1 day (time interval for calculation).

2.8. Respiration Rate and Cumulative Respiration Amount of Cut Roses

At designated time points during vase holding, the cut roses were placed in a 62 L sealed glass chamber for gas collection over a period of 1 h. Carbon dioxide concentrations in the chamber headspace were measured immediately before and after the collection period using a gas analyzer (Eranntex PTM600, Shenzhen, China). The respiration rate (RR, mg CO2 kg−1 h−1) of the cut roses was calculated as follows:
RR   =     ( C f     C i )   ×   0.111352 t   ×   FW c
where Ci is the initial CO2 concentration (ppm), Cf is the final CO2 concentration (ppm), t is the sampling duration (1 h), FWc is the fresh weight of cut flowers on the current day (g), and 0.111352 is the conversion coefficient for 62 L headspace at 25 °C/101.325 kPa (converting ppm CO2 to mg CO2).
The cumulative respiration (CR, mg CO2·kg−1) of the cut roses was calculated as follows:
CR   =   k = 1 n RR k   ×   24  
where RRk is the respiration rate measured on day k during vase holding, and 24 is the number of hours per day.

2.9. B. cinerea Incidence and Vase Life of Cut Roses

B. cinerea incidence was recorded daily as the presence/absence of characteristic lesions on petals or leaves. Cut roses showing ≥1 typical lesion (water-soaked spots progressing to grey mold) were scored as infected. No severity scale was applied; evaluation was strictly binary (infected vs. non-infected). The incidence rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of infected cut roses to the total number of cut roses observed.
Vase life was defined as the duration from the start of vase holding until the onset of any of the following: irreversible wilting (≥50% petal collapse), senescence, discoloration, petal or leaf abscission, stem decay, or other signs indicative of loss of ornamental value.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were performed with at least three replicates, and data are presented as means. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range test using SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) at a significance level of p < 0.05. SPSS 17.0 was used for the Pearson correlation analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Cooling Efficiency of FAC in Cut Roses

For FAC, the vent hole diameter in packaging boxes is an important parameter that affects the airflow rate. To evaluate the cooling performance of different vent hole diameters in FAC systems, we monitored the real-time temperature profiles of cut roses throughout the precooling process (Figure S1).
Compared to the control group (1.5 °C·h−1), FAC significantly accelerated cooling, with the average cooling rate increasing by 9.7- to 16.3-fold. Increasing the vent hole diameter in packaging boxes from 4 cm to 8 cm enhanced the average cooling rate by 34% (from 14.5 °C·h−1 to 19.5 °C·h−1). However, further increasing the diameter to 12 cm yielded only 25% additional improvement (24.4 °C·h−1), which was less than the improvement achieved when increasing from 4 cm to 8 cm vents (Table 1).

3.2. Effect of FAC on Vase Life and B. cinerea Incidence in Cut Roses

The ultimate objective of FAC treatment of cut flowers is to extend their vase life. Since vase longevity is primarily governed by both the intrinsic senescence rate and B. cinerea infection, we evaluated vase life and B. cinerea incidence in cut roses to determine FAC efficacy.
Compared with the control group, FAC delayed wilting onset (Figure 1A). After precooling treatment, vase life increased progressively in the following order: control < FAC4 < FAC12 < FAC8 (Figure 1A,B). Without the B. cinerea control, FAC-treated roses exhibited less severe symptoms than the controls on day 5 (Figure 1C). Throughout the vase holding period, disease incidence in all FAC groups was lower than in the control group. Among FAC groups, FAC4 showed the highest infection rate, FAC12 intermediate, and FAC8 the lowest (Figure 1D).

3.3. Effect of Forced-Air Cooling on Respiration, Transpiration, and Water Uptake Rates of Cut Roses

The most crucial factors resulting in vase life reduction include water stress and insufficient available carbohydrates. In order to investigate the effects of precooling on the physiological parameters of cut roses, the transpiration rate, water uptake rate, and respiration rate of cut roses during the vase holding period were measured.
During early vase days (days 1–5), FAC-treated roses exhibited higher transpiration and water uptake rates than controls. In late vase days (days 5–9), a significant decline in water uptake rate coincided with a reduced transpiration rate in FAC-treated cut roses, while controls showed an elevated transpiration rate (Figure 2A,B). On day 1, FAC-treated roses had a higher respiration rate than the controls. During days 2–5, their respiration rate dropped below that of controls, followed by a more gradual increase through days 5–9 (Figure 2C). Throughout the vase holding period, FAC-treated cut roses had lower respiratory activity than the controls. Among FAC treatments, FAC8 decreased cumulative respiration by 15% compared with the control group (Figure 2D).

3.4. Effect of FAC on Stomatal Function in Cut Roses

Water issues comprise one of the most detrimental factors affecting the vase life of cut flowers. In cut roses, water relations are primarily mediated through the stomatal function of leaves. To investigate the effects of FAC on stomatal function in cut roses, the stomatal apertures in leaves were observed after precooling. Subsequently, rehydrated leaves were subjected to a water loss treatment to examine the stomatal response to dehydration stress. Concurrently, leaf relative water content and transpiration rate were monitored throughout dehydration.
After FAC treatment, leaves exhibited significantly smaller stomatal apertures than in the control group (p < 0.05). Among FAC treatments, FAC8 induced the strongest stomatal closure, with apertures significantly smaller than those in FAC4 and FAC12 (aperture size: FAC4 > FAC12 > FAC8; Figure 3A,B). During simulated transport, FAC-treated cut flowers demonstrated a significantly lower fresh weight loss rate compared to the controls. FAC8 showed the lowest fresh weight loss, followed by FAC12 and FAC4 (highest loss; Figure S2). During water loss treatment, FAC-treated leaves exhibited significantly smaller stomatal apertures than the controls (p < 0.05; Figure 3A,B). Consistent with post-FAC stomatal aperture measurements, FAC8 induced the strongest stomatal closure (stomatal aperture: FAC4 > FAC12 > FAC8). As leaf relative water content decreased, FAC groups exhibited significantly lower transpiration rates than the control group in both the stomatal transpiration phase (uninhibited stomata) and cuticular transpiration phase (stomatal suppression) during dehydration. Among FAC treatment, the transpiration rates were in the order of FAC4 > FAC12 > FAC8 across both phases (Figure 3C). Compared to the controls, FAC-treated leaves showed a slower relative water content decline and lower transpiration rate during water loss treatment (Figure S3).

3.5. Correlation Analysis of Measured Indices

To determine whether stomatal functional changes induced by FAC significantly affected the physiological properties and commercial quality of cut roses, we performed correlation analyses among the measured indices.
The results demonstrated that the vase life of FAC-treated cut flowers was significantly correlated with the fresh weight loss rate during simulated transportation, B. cinerea incidence, water uptake rate, transpiration rate, cumulative respiration, stomatal aperture, transpiration rate of leaves, and relative water content of leaves. Notably, the strongest correlation for vase life was observed with stomatal aperture after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment, exhibiting a correlation coefficient as high as 0.93. In addition to their significant correlation with vase life, stomatal aperture after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment were also significantly correlated with the fresh weight loss rate during simulated transportation, B. cinerea incidence on the 5th and 9th days of the vase holding period, water uptake rate on days 1 and 5, transpiration rate on days 1 and 5, respiratory rate on day 9, cumulative respiration on day 9, transpiration rate of leaves after a 280-min water loss treatment, and relative water content of leaves after 280 and 540 min water loss treatment. This high degree of overlap between indicators significantly correlated with vase life, and those correlated with stomatal aperture after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment indicated that the vase life of FAC-treated cut flowers is strongly correlated with stomatal aperture-related parameters (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

4.1. Influence of Vent Hole Diameter on Commercial Quality of FAC-Treated Cut Roses

FAC is a prevalent precooling technique in horticultural preservation [31,32]. FAC has been shown to impact the quality and cooling efficiency of fruits and vegetables by adjusting crucial parameters [31,33], such as vent hole diameter and airflow velocity [34]. In the realm of cut flower preservation, vase life and the incidence of B. cinerea are key indicators of commercial quality [35,36]. The cooling efficacy of forced-air cooling for cut flowers is primarily governed by the volumetric flow rate of cold air convectively exchanging heat with flowers and the temperature of the cooling air. The temperature of the cooling air is typically maintained at the optimal storage temperature (2 °C) for cut flowers [5]. Previous studies have shown that FAC can delay bent neck and petal wilting in cut roses by increasing airflow velocity [29]. Our preliminary experiments established 2 m·s−1 as the suitable airflow velocity for achieving rapid and uniform cooling in cut flowers. However, no studies to date have investigated the impact of vent hole diameter on precooling effectiveness for cut flowers, nor the effect of FAC on B. cinerea incidence in cut flowers. Therefore, this study employed vent hole diameter as the variable regulating the forced-air cooling treatment rate to investigate the effects of forced-air cooling on cut roses. Our study fills these voids by demonstrating that the vent hole diameter exerts a profound effect on both the vase life and the incidence of B. cinerea in FAC-treated cut roses. Following FAC with three vent hole diameters (4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm), cut roses in the FAC group with the 8 cm vent hole exhibited optimal commodity quality. This result suggests that there exists an optimal balance in the design of packaging ventilation for FAC that maximizes the preservation of cut flower quality. These results demonstrate that employing packaging boxes with appropriately sized vent holes for FAC application to cut flowers effectively enhances the commercial quality of cut flowers.

4.2. FAC Prolongs Vase Life Through Regulation of Respiration and Transpiration Properties in Cut Flowers

Vase life in cut flowers is primarily governed by postharvest physiological metabolism [37]. Key factors resulting in vase life reduction include water stress and insufficient available carbohydrates [20,38,39]. Excessive respiratory activity during the vase holding period depletes stored nutrients prematurely, thereby shortening vase life [40]. During dry storage after harvest, the cessation of water supply coupled with excessive transpiration negatively impacts vase life [41]. Upon transfer to vases, transpirational pull directly influences water uptake [42]. The equilibrium between transpiration and water uptake constitutes a key determinant of wilting [21,43]. When transpirational water loss exceeds uptake capacity, cut flowers experience water stress, exhibiting symptoms such as wilting and discoloration that lead to loss of ornamental value [44,45]. While the efficacy of FAC in prolonging vase life of cut roses is established, its underlying physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, FAC-treated flowers exhibited a higher respiratory rate than the controls on the 1st day of the vase holding period, potentially facilitating the recovery of normal physiological functions. Subsequently, the respiratory rate declined rapidly and rose gradually during later vase stages, probably helping to reduce nutrient depletion and delaying senescence. During the initial vase holding period, FAC-treated cut roses maintained an elevated transpiration rate, potentially facilitating rehydration and flower opening. As senescence progressed in later stages, the reduced respiration rate minimized water loss, sustaining hydraulic balance. Notably, FAC-treated cut roses consistently demonstrated a higher water uptake rate throughout the vase holding period compared to the controls, indicating that FAC likely enhances hydration by modulating transpiration. In summary, our findings demonstrate that FAC prolongs vase life in cut flowers by regulating respiratory and transpirational properties.

4.3. Stomatal Function Modulation by FAC Regulates Physiological Properties in Cut Flowers

Stomata serve as critical channels for gas exchange and water transport in plants [46,47], fulfilling essential functions that include regulating photosynthetic and respiratory gas exchange [48], modulating transpiration to maintain water balance [49], and influencing plant stress responses [28,50,51]. Cut flowers actively regulate the stomatal aperture to control water loss under dehydrating conditions [19]. It has been demonstrated that cut flower vase life after storage is strongly dependent on leaf stomatal functionality [28]. Although stomatal function is recognized as pivotal for postharvest physiological properties in cut flowers [19], the impact of FAC on stomatal behavior remains unclear. In this study, after FAC treatment, the leaves of FAC-treated groups maintained significantly tighter stomatal closure, and cut roses in these groups exhibited a lower fresh weight loss rate during simulated transport compared to the controls. Meanwhile, the leaves of FAC-treated groups also exhibited significantly tighter stomatal closure during water loss treatment compared to the control, leading to a reduced transpiration rate and mitigating fresh weight decline. Combined with the findings of this study regarding FAC’s effects on respiratory properties and water balance, these results collectively revealed FAC’s influence on stomatal function. Critically, stomatal functionality indicators showed a significant correlation with physiological and metabolic markers. These findings indicate that FAC8 treatment enabled cut roses to maintain superior stomatal regulatory capacity compared to the control group and FAC4 and FAC12 treatments. This enhanced physiological function resulted in improved water economy and a reduced respiration rate during vase life, along with tighter stomatal closure during water deficit stress, collectively contributing to better preservation of postharvest quality.

5. Conclusions

The current study compared the effects of FAC and a controls treatment using a conventional slow cooling method on the cooling performance, physiological properties, and commercial quality of cut roses. It was observed that FAC cooled cut roses more rapidly than the control treatment. FAC affected the stomatal function in leaves, reduced postharvest fresh weight loss, decreased the respiration rate during the vase holding period, enhanced water balance between transpiration and water uptake, mitigated B. cinerea incidence, and prolonged the vase life of cut flowers. These measured indices were all significantly correlated across treatment groups. The overall findings suggest that FAC modulates the stomatal aperture in cut roses, thereby regulating respiratory and transpirational properties to ultimately extend vase life. Future studies should elucidate the signaling mechanisms by which FAC enhances the stomatal closure capacity in cut roses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae11080959/s1, Figure S1: Cooling curves of cut roses under different precooling treatments; Figure S2: Fresh weight loss rate of cut rose leaves during simulated transportation; Figure S3: Relative water content and average transpiration rate of cut rose leaves during water loss treatment; File S1. Raw data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G., J.G. and X.S.; methodology, W.W.; formal analysis, R.G. and J.B.; investigation, R.G., J.B., L.L. and X.W.; resources, X.S.; data curation, R.G.; writing—original draft, R.G.; writing—review and editing, J.S., H.Y., H.Z., J.G. and X.S.; visualization, R.G. and J.B.; supervision, X.S.; funding acquisition, J.G. and X.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32441077 and 32230094) and the Prosper Yunnan Talent Support Program (grant number XDYC-QNRC-2023-0454).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Yunnan Flower Technology Training and Promotion Center and Yunnan Zhihui Horticulture Co., Ltd. for providing the cut flower materials, as well as the post-harvest processing workshop for cut flowers. We thank Yunnan Yuntianhua Limited by Share Ltd. for providing a research laboratory. We sincerely thank all colleagues who made suggestions on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jin, W.; Gong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, H.; Wei, Y.; Tang, K.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, J.; Sun, X. Cytokinin-responsive RhRR1–RhSCL28 transcription factor module positively regulates petal size by promoting cell division in rose. J. Exp. Bot. 2025, 76, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, C.; Hussain, N.; Ma, Y.; Zuo, L.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, X.; Gao, J. The ARF2–MYB6 module mediates auxin-regulated petal expansion in rose. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 4489–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wu, Z.; Sun, X.; Gao, J. Transcription factors RhPIF4/8 and RhHY5 regulate autophagy-mediated petal senescence in rose (Rosa hybrida). Hortic. Adv. 2023, 1, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reid, M. Advances in shipping and handling of ornamentals. Acta Hortic. 2001, 543, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reid, M.S. Handling of cut flowers for air transport. In IATA Perishable. Cargo Manual Flowers; IATA: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2000; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Leonard, R.T.; Alexander, A.M.; Nell, T.A. Postharvest performance of selected colombian cut flowers after three transport systems to the united states. Horttechnology 2011, 21, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ambaw, A.; Fadiji, T.; Opara, U.L. Thermo-mechanical analysis in the fresh fruit cold chain: A review on recent advances. Foods 2021, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Elansari, A.M.; Fenton, D.L.; Callahan, C.W. Precooling. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 161–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Toan, K.N.; Youn, O.J.; Jin, H.L. Tools for cut flower for export: Is it a genuine challenge from growers to customers? Flower Res. J. 2020, 28, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, J.; Song, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, W. Forced-air precooling treatment enhanced antioxidant capacities of apricots. J. Food Process Preserv. 2018, 42, e13320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cortbaoui, P.; Goyette, B.; Gariépy, Y.; Charles, M.T.; Raghavan, V.G.; Vigneault, C. Forced air cooling system for Zea mays. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2006, 4, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.; Teng, J.; Liang, J.; Gibson, B.W.; Zhang, W.; Li, A.; Cheng, Y.; Zeng, Y. Effect of different pre-cooling strategies on the storage quality of kiwifruit. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 344, 114105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shilpa; Mahajan, B.V.C.; Singh, N.P.; Bhullar, K.S.; Kaur, S. Forced air cooling delays pericarp browning and maintains post-harvest quality of litchi fruit during cold storage. Acta Physiol. Plant 2022, 44, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, C.; Wu, Y.; Guo, H.; Chen, C.; Zeng, K.; Yao, S. Forced air pre-cooling effect on broccoli storage quality and reactive oxygen species metabolism. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023, 49, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiao, X.; Gao, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Bai, Y. Improving quality and antioxidant capacity of nectarine by forced-air precooling during storage and transportation. Food Ferment. Ind. 2020, 46, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Fu, Y.; Yan, J.; Song, H.; Jiang, W. Forced air precooling enhanced storage quality by activating the antioxidant system of mango fruits. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 1606058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fanourakis, D.; Pieruschka, R.; Savvides, A.; Macnish, A.J.; Sarlikioti, V.; Woltering, E.J. Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 78, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, X.; Qin, M.; Yu, Q.; Huang, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, N.; Gao, J. Molecular understanding of postharvest flower opening and senescence. Mol. Hortic. 2021, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fanourakis, D.; Papadopoulou, E.; Valla, A.; Tzanakakis, V.A.; Nektarios, P.A. Partitioning of transpiration to cut flower organs and its mediating role on vase life response to dry handling: A case study in chrysanthemum. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 181, 111636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Daneshmand, B.; Gholami, M.; Etemadi, N.; Ehtemam, M.H. The water relation parameters are associated with the genotypic differences in the vase life of cut rose flowers. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 211, 112829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manzoor, A.; Bashir, M.A.; Naveed, M.S.; Akhtar, M.T.; Saeed, S. Postharvest chemical treatment of physiologically induced stem end blockage improves vase life and water relation of cut flowers. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fang, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Liao, W. Hydrogen gas increases the vase life of cut rose ‘movie star’ by regulating bacterial community in the stem ends. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 181, 111685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thakur, N. Effect of pulsing and storage methods for extending vase life of cut flowers. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2020, 8, 1320–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clark, J.W.; Harris, B.J.; Hetherington, A.J.; Hurtado-Castano, N.; Brench, R.A.; Casson, S.; Williams, T.A.; Gray, J.E.; Hetherington, A.M. The origin and evolution of stomata. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, R539–R553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, L. Emerging roles of protein phosphorylation in regulation of stomatal development. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 280, 153882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, S.; Rodrigues, O.; Liu, Z.; Shan, L.; He, P. Small holes, big impact: Stomata in plant–pathogen–climate epic trifecta. Mol. Plant. 2024, 17, 26–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Márquez, D.; Gardner, A.; Busch, F. Navigating challenges in interpreting plant physiology responses through gas exchange results in stressed plants. Plant Ecophysiol. 2025, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Woltering, E.J.; Paillart, M.J.M. Effect of cold storage on stomatal functionality, water relations and flower performance in cut roses. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 136, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kilany, L.; Sawan, J.; El Assi, N. Maintaining high quality roses by a simple locally-made forced-air cooling unit. Jordan J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 3, 222–232. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117006460 (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  30. Ma, N.; Cai, L.; Lu, W.; Tan, H.; Gao, J. Exogenous ethylene influences flower opening of cut roses (Rosa hybrida) by regulating the genes encoding ethylene biosynthesis enzymes. Sci. China Ser. C 2005, 48, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, L.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z. Numerical analysis of air supply alternatives for forced-air precooling of agricultural produce. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Q.; Qian, J.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Lin, X.; Wang, B. Multiscale coupling analysis and modeling of airflow and heat transfer for warehouse-packaging-kiwifruit under forced-air cooling. Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 244, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alabi, K. An overview of recent advances in cooling techniques for fresh fruits and vegetables. Agri. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2024, 26, 213–221. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379435563 (accessed on 13 June 2025).
  34. Wang, D.; Lai, Y.; Zhao, H.; Jia, B.; Wang, Q.; Yang, X. Numerical and experimental investigation on forced-air cooling of commercial packaged strawberries. Int. J. Food Eng. 2019, 15, 20180384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zulfiqar, F.; Moosa, A.; Ferrante, A.; Darras, A.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ali, B.; Altaf, M.A.; Soufan, W.; El Sabagh, A. Borage leaf extract improves the vase life of cut gladiolus flowers by delaying the senescence process and reducing water stress. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 210, 112766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ullah, I.; Yuan, W.; Khalil, H.B.; Khan, M.R.; Lak, F.; Uzair, M.; Abbas, A.; Mirzadi Gohari, A.; Wu, H. Understanding Botrytis cinerea infection and gray mold management: A review paper on deciphering the rose’s thorn. Phytopathol. Res. 2024, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, D.; Yu, S.; Qu, L.; Yang, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Y. Methyl jasmonate enhances vase life and alters physiological and molecular responses in tree peony ‘ Luoyang Hong ‘ cut flowers. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2025, 224, 113481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ha, S.T.T.; Lim, J.H.; In, B. Extension of the vase life of cut roses by both improving water relations and repressing ethylene responses. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2019, 37, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Verdonk, J.; Ieperen, W.; Carvalho, D.; Geest, G.; Schouten, R. Effect of preharvest conditions on cut-flower quality. Front Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1281456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sutrisno; Skutnik, E.; Rabiza-Świder, J. Optimising the vase life of cut hydrangeas: A review of the impact of various treatments. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Franzoni, G.; Rovera, C.; Farris, S.; Ferrante, A. Packaging materials and their effect on ruscus quality changes during storage and vase life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 210, 112789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chavarria, G.; Dos Santos, H.P. Plant water relations: Absorption, transport and control mechanisms. Adv. Sel. Plant Physiol. Aspects 2012, 1, 105–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Priyanka, M.; Lakshminarayana, D.; Gowthami, P.; Sathish, G. Effect of biocides onvaselife of carnation cut flower (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) Cv. Dona. Plant Arch. 2024, 24, 2407–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gupta, J.; Dubey, R. Factors affecting post-harvest life of flower crops. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, M.; Zhang, P.; Sun, Y.; Shang, W.; Shi, L.; Yu, S.; He, S.; Song, Y.; Wang, Z. Melatonin treatment delays the senescence of cut flowers of “Diguan” tree peony by affecting water balance and physiological properties. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, H.; Su, J.; Ren, Z.; Wang, D.; Hills, A.; Kinoshita, T.; Blatt, M.R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Dual function of overexpressing plasma membrane H+-ATPase in balancing carbon-water use. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadp8017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gong, L.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Altihani, F.A.; Al-Balawi, S.M.; Anazi, H.K.; Alharbi, B.M.; Hasan, M.M. TOT3–AHA1 module: Its role in fine-tuning stomatal responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1582196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, G.; Qin, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Zeng, F.; Deng, F.; Chater, C.; Xu, S.; Chen, Z. Stomatal evolution and plant adaptation to future climate. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 3299–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lawson, T.; Leakey, A.D.B. Stomata: Custodians of leaf gaseous exchange. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 6677–6682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, X.; Li, J.; Wei, S.; Gao, Y.; Pei, H.; Geng, R.; Lu, Z.; Wang, P.; Zhou, W. Maize GOLDEN2-LIKE proteins enhance drought tolerance in rice by promoting stomatal closure. Plant Physiol. 2024, 194, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gong, L.; Hazzazi, Y.; Alfaifi, T.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Alnusaire, T.; Altihani, F.; Dhawi, F.; Alharbi, B.; Hasan, M.M. Root-to-shoot hormonal and hydraulic signals in stomatal regulation during drought. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phenotypes of cut roses during the vase holding period after different precooling treatments. (A) Flower appearance. The scale bar is 1 cm. (B) Vase life. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 15). Lowercase letters denote significant differences according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). (C) Phenotypes of Botrytis cinerea infection on the 5th day of the vase holding period. The red arrow indicates the infection site of B. cinerea. The scale bar is 1 cm. (D) Incidence of B. cinerea on cut roses during the vase holding period (based on presence/absence of B. cinerea lesion). Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 15). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments on the same vase day according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively.
Figure 1. Phenotypes of cut roses during the vase holding period after different precooling treatments. (A) Flower appearance. The scale bar is 1 cm. (B) Vase life. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 15). Lowercase letters denote significant differences according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). (C) Phenotypes of Botrytis cinerea infection on the 5th day of the vase holding period. The red arrow indicates the infection site of B. cinerea. The scale bar is 1 cm. (D) Incidence of B. cinerea on cut roses during the vase holding period (based on presence/absence of B. cinerea lesion). Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 15). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments on the same vase day according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively.
Horticulturae 11 00959 g001
Figure 2. Respiration, transpiration, and water uptake rates of cut roses after different precooling treatments. (A) Transpiration rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (B) Water uptake rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (C) Respiration rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (D) Cumulative respiration of cut roses during the vase holding period. FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments on the same vase day according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Respiration, transpiration, and water uptake rates of cut roses after different precooling treatments. (A) Transpiration rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (B) Water uptake rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (C) Respiration rate of cut roses during the vase holding period. (D) Cumulative respiration of cut roses during the vase holding period. FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments on the same vase day according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Horticulturae 11 00959 g002
Figure 3. Stomatal function of cut rose leaves after different precooling treatments. (A) Phenotypes of stomata on cut rose leaves after precooling (AP) and after a 2 h water loss treatment (WDS). Stomata indicated by red arrows exhibited differential stomatal aperture compared to the control group. The scale bar is 50 μm. FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively. (B) Measurements of stomatal aperture on cut rose leaves after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 6). Lowercase letters denote significant differences according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). (C) The average transpiration rate as a function of relative water content. Linear regression fit (n = 8). STT represents stage of stomatal transpiration, and SCT represents stage of cuticular transpiration.
Figure 3. Stomatal function of cut rose leaves after different precooling treatments. (A) Phenotypes of stomata on cut rose leaves after precooling (AP) and after a 2 h water loss treatment (WDS). Stomata indicated by red arrows exhibited differential stomatal aperture compared to the control group. The scale bar is 50 μm. FAC4, FAC8, and FAC12 represent FAC using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm, 8 cm, and 12 cm, respectively. (B) Measurements of stomatal aperture on cut rose leaves after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 6). Lowercase letters denote significant differences according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). (C) The average transpiration rate as a function of relative water content. Linear regression fit (n = 8). STT represents stage of stomatal transpiration, and SCT represents stage of cuticular transpiration.
Horticulturae 11 00959 g003
Figure 4. Correlation analysis among measured indices. VL represents vase life. BI1, BI5, and BI9 represent B. cinerea incidence on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. FWLR represents fresh weight loss rate of cut rose leaves during simulated transportation. WUR1, WUR5, and WUR9 represent water uptake on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. TR1, TR5, and TR9 represent the transpiration rate on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. RR1, RR5, and RR9 represent the respiratory rate on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. CR1, CR5, and CR9 represent cumulative respiration on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. SAAP and SAWDS represent the stomatal aperture of cut rose leaves after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment. TRL20, TRL280, and TRL540 represent the transpiration rate of cut rose leaves after 20 min, 280 min, and 540 min water loss treatments, respectively. RWCL20, RWCL280, and RWCL540 represent the relative water content of cut rose leaves after 20 min, 280 min, and 540 min water loss treatments, respectively. *, **, and *** indicate significance at the p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 levels, respectively.
Figure 4. Correlation analysis among measured indices. VL represents vase life. BI1, BI5, and BI9 represent B. cinerea incidence on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. FWLR represents fresh weight loss rate of cut rose leaves during simulated transportation. WUR1, WUR5, and WUR9 represent water uptake on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. TR1, TR5, and TR9 represent the transpiration rate on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. RR1, RR5, and RR9 represent the respiratory rate on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. CR1, CR5, and CR9 represent cumulative respiration on the 1st, 5th, and 9th days of the vase holding period, respectively. SAAP and SAWDS represent the stomatal aperture of cut rose leaves after precooling and after a 2 h water loss treatment. TRL20, TRL280, and TRL540 represent the transpiration rate of cut rose leaves after 20 min, 280 min, and 540 min water loss treatments, respectively. RWCL20, RWCL280, and RWCL540 represent the relative water content of cut rose leaves after 20 min, 280 min, and 540 min water loss treatments, respectively. *, **, and *** indicate significance at the p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 levels, respectively.
Horticulturae 11 00959 g004
Table 1. Cooling efficiency of cut roses.
Table 1. Cooling efficiency of cut roses.
TreatmentControlFAC4FAC8FAC12
Parameter
Qin (L·s−1)02.5110.0522.62
Ti (°C)19.8 a19.7 a20.1 a19.8 a
ACR (°C h−1)1.5 b14.5 ab19.5 a24.4 a
Note: Forced-air cooling (FAC) using packaging boxes with vent hole diameters of 4 cm (FAC4), 8 cm (FAC8), and 12 cm (FAC12). Qin represents the airflow rate at the inlet of the packaging boxes. Ti represents the initial temperature of cut roses before precooling. ACR represents the average cooling rate. Data are shown as means (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gu, R.; Bai, J.; Sun, J.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Yan, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Gao, J.; Sun, X. Effects of Cardboard Box Ventilation Hole Size During Forced-Air Precooling on Postharvest Quality and Physiological Properties in Cut Roses. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080959

AMA Style

Gu R, Bai J, Sun J, Li L, Wang X, Yan H, Zhang H, Wang W, Gao J, Sun X. Effects of Cardboard Box Ventilation Hole Size During Forced-Air Precooling on Postharvest Quality and Physiological Properties in Cut Roses. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(8):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gu, Ruifeng, Jie Bai, Jiawei Sun, Lei Li, Xuan Wang, Huijun Yan, Hao Zhang, Wensheng Wang, Junping Gao, and Xiaoming Sun. 2025. "Effects of Cardboard Box Ventilation Hole Size During Forced-Air Precooling on Postharvest Quality and Physiological Properties in Cut Roses" Horticulturae 11, no. 8: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080959

APA Style

Gu, R., Bai, J., Sun, J., Li, L., Wang, X., Yan, H., Zhang, H., Wang, W., Gao, J., & Sun, X. (2025). Effects of Cardboard Box Ventilation Hole Size During Forced-Air Precooling on Postharvest Quality and Physiological Properties in Cut Roses. Horticulturae, 11(8), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop