Sustainable and Innovative Postharvest Management of Anthracnose Disease in Guavas Through Modulated UV-C Light Treatment
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fungal Isolate
2.2. Instrumentation
2.3. Calculation to Determine the Total Dose of Modulated UV-C Energy Applied to the Guava
2.3.1. Modulation Frequency (fch)
2.3.2. Simplified Modulation Frequency (fch)
2.3.3. Energy Emitted in Half a Cycle (ET/2)
2.3.4. Number of Pulses in the ton Interval (NT/2)
2.3.5. Total Energy Transferred (ER)
2.4. Influence of the Modulated UV-C on Germination of Colletotrichum sp. (In Vitro Experiment)
2.5. Influence of the Modulated UV-C on Colletotrichum sp. Mycelial Growth (In Vivo Experiment)
2.5.1. Plant Raw Material
2.5.2. Inoculation
2.5.3. UV-C Irradiation
2.6. Physicochemical Analysis
2.7. Respiration Analysis
2.8. Statistical Analysis
2.8.1. Assessment of Colletotrichum sp. Germination via CFU (In Vitro Experiment)
2.8.2. Incidence, Severity, and AUDPC of the Disease Agent Colletotrichum spp. in Guavas (In Vivo Experiment)
2.8.3. Guava Physicochemical Quality and Respiration Rate
3. Results
3.1. Influence of the Modulated UV-C on Colletotrichum sp. Germination (In Vitro Experiment)
3.2. Influence of Modulated UV-C Radiation on Colletotrichum sp. Incidence and the Severity of Anthracnose in Guava (In Vivo Experiment)
3.3. Physicochemical Analyses
3.4. Respiration Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Influence of the Modulated UV-C on Colletotrichum sp. (Germination) Colony-Forming Units (In Vitro Experiment)
4.2. Influence of the Modulated UV-C on Colletotrichum sp. Incidence and Mycelial Growth (In Vivo Experiment)
4.3. Guava Postharvest Quality and Shelf-Life
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AUDPC | Area under the disease progress curve |
| CFU | Colony-forming units |
| SS | Soluble solids |
| TA | Titratable acidity |
| UV-C | Ultraviolet radiation C band |
Appendix A
| Definitions | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Source Radiant Power (ψ) | The radiant power (W) emitted in all directions by a radiant energy source. |
| Irradiance (E) | The total radiant power from all directions incident on an infinitesimal element of surface area dS, divided by dS. The SI unit of irradiance is W/m2 or mW/cm2. For the position r from a point source. |
| Intensity radiant (I) | The power emitted from a point source into a small solid angle dΩ steradians (sr) about a given direction from the source. The SI of I is W/sr. For a point source, ψ=4πI, where I does not decrease with distance in a non-absorbing medium. |
| Fluence rate (E’) | The radiant power passing from all directions through an infinitesimally small sphere of cross-sectional area dA, divided by dA. The SI unit of fluence rate is W/m2, but μW/cm2 or mW/cm2 are in use. The fluence rate and irradiance are the same units but conceptually different terms. However, fluence and irradiance are the same for a collimated light beam. |
| UV Dose or Fluence (H) | The total radiant energy from all directions passing through an infinitesimally small sphere of cross-sectional area dA, divided by dA. The SI unit of UV dose is J/m2 or as mJ/cm2. |
References
- FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: Statistical Database-Production (Crops and Livestock Products); FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024; Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on 14 July 2025).
- Costa, L.C.; Santos, L.R.; França, R.; Davini, G.; Shirai, M.A. Aplicação de diferentes revestimentos comestíveis na conservação pós-colheita de goiabas (Psidium guajava L.). Braz. J. Food Res. 2017, 8, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Peres, N.A.R.; Kuramae, E.E.; Dias, M.S.C.; Souza, N.L. Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum spp. Affecting fruit after harvest in Brazil. J. Phytopathol. 2002, 150, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, W.R.O.; Vieira, W.A.S.; Reis, A.; Miller, R.N.G.; Santos, M.D.M.; Costa, E.C.; Câmara, M.P.S.; Café-Filho, A.C. Diversity of Colletotrichum causing anthracnose on Psidium guajava in varied Brazilian physiographic regions. Plant Pathol. 2024, 73, 1213–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, K.F.D.; Oliveira, K.Á.R.; Cirilo, Í.F.; Lima, M.C.; Câmara, M.P.S.; Souza, E.L. A novel coating formulated with sodium alginate loaded with a mixed lactic acid bacteria culture to control anthracnose in guava and mango. Food Control 2025, 175, 111341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A.; Kumar, N.; Upadhyay, A.; Fawole, O.A.; Mahawar, M.K.; Jalgaonkar, K.; Chandran, D.; Rajalingam, S.; Zengin, G.; Kumar, M.; et al. Recent Advances in Novel Packaging Technologies for Shelf-Life Extension of Guava Fruits for Retaining Health Benefits for Longer Duration. Plants 2022, 11, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peralta-Ruiz, Y.; Rossi, C.; Grande-Tovar, C.D.; Chaves-López, C. Green Management of Postharvest Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Zuo, J.; Yuan, S.; Shi, W.; Shi, J.; Feng, B.; Wang, Q. UV-C Treatment Maintains the Sensory Quality, Antioxidant Activity and Flavor of Pepino Fruit during Postharvest Storage. Foods 2021, 10, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scolfaro, F.P.; Benato, E.A.; Melo, W.L.B.; Sigrist, J.M.M.; Vitali, A.A.; Cia, P.; Castro, M.F.P.M.; Bueno, G.C. Uso da luz Branca Intensa Modulada para Controle de Doenças em Frutos Pós-Colheita; Embrapa: São Carlos, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Oster, A.H.; Silva, E.O.; Bordallo, P.N.; Zocolo, G.; Silveira, M.R.S.; Filho, F.O.; Araújo, A.A.C. Luz Ultravioleta Pulsada no Controle de Podridão Pós-Colheita e na Qualidade de Melão para Exportação; ResearchGate: Berlin, Germany, 2018; Available online: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1098235 (accessed on 1 August 2025).
- Philips Lighting, 2022. UV-C Disinfection Lamps: Product Catalog [WWW Document]. Signify. Available online: https://www.assets.signify.com/is/content/Signify/Assets/philips-lighting/global/20210322-philips-uvc-disinfection-lamps-catalog.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2025).
- Cavalini, F.C.; Jacomino, A.P.; Lochoski, M.A.; Kluge, R.A.; Ortega, E.M.M. Maturity indexes for ‘Kumagai’ and ‘Paluma’ guavas. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2006, 28, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konica Minolta. Color Spaces; Learning Center; Konica Minolta Sensing Americas Inc.: Ramsey, NJ, USA, 2024; Available online: https://sensing.konicaminolta.us/us/learning-center/color-measurement/color-spaces/ (accessed on 8 August 2025).
- Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Métodos Físico-Químicos para Análise de Alimentos, 4th ed.; Instituto Adolfo Lutz: São Paulo, Brazil, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Frighetto, R.T.S.; Terao, D.; Sasaki, F.F.C.; Cerqueira, T.S. Quantificação da Respiração e de Etileno em Vegetais por Cromatografia Gasosa com Detectores em Série; Embrapa Meio Ambiente: Jaguariúna, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- SAS Institute Inc. The Regression Procedure (PROC REG) of the SAS/STAT® Software, Version 15.3; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 8 August 2025).
- Duque-Sarango, P.; Delgado-Armijos, N.; Romero-Martínez, L.; Cruz, D.; Pinos-Vélez, V. Advancing waterborne fungal spore control: UV-LED disinfection efficiency and post-treatment reactivation analysis. Water 2025, 17, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rufyikiri, A.S.; Martinez, R.; Addo, P.W.; Wu, B.-S.; Yousefi, M.; Malo, D.; Orsat, V.; Vidal, S.M.; Fritz, J.H.; MacPherson, S.; et al. Germicidal efficacy of continuous and pulsed ultraviolet-C radiation on pathogen models and SARS-CoV-2. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2024, 23, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, I.; Jang, J.H.; Lim, S.; Wang, Z.; Cha, M.; Magill, C.; Kim, L.S.; Meinhardt, L.W.; Sunchung, P.; Ahn, E. Differential responses of Cacao pathogens Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Pestalotiopsis sp. to UVB 305 nm and UVC 275 nm. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 36256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaw, M.M.; Setha, S.; Naradisorn, M. Comparison of hot water and UV-C treatments in controlling postharvest disease and maintaining postharvest quality of ‘Nam Dok Mai Si Thong’ mango. Acta Hortic. 2022, 1336, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Aguilar, G.A.; Villegas-Ochoa, M.A.; Martínez-Téllez, M.A.; Gardea, A.A.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F. Improving Antioxidant Capacity of Fresh-Cut Mangoes Treated with UV-C. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menaka, M.; Asrey, R.; Vinod, B.R.; Ahamad, S.; Meena, N.K.; Bhan, C.; Goswami, A.K. UV-C Irradiation Enhances the Quality and Shelf-Life of Stored Guava Fruit via Boosting the Antioxidant Systems and Defense Responses. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 17, 3704–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Itani, N.; Fadel, M.E. Microbial inactivation kinetics of UV LEDs and effect of operating conditions: A methodological critical analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nyangaresi, P.O.; Qin, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, B.; Lu, Y.; Shen, L. Comparative performance of pulsed and continuous UV-C-LED irradiation in the inactivation of bacteria. Water Res. 2019, 157, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.; Zhang, M.; Bai, H.; Yang, F.; Zhang, X.; Ren, D.; Du, Y. Combined ultraviolet-C radiation and L-cysteine treatment improves the postharvest quality and volatile compounds of edible Lanzhou lily bulbs (Lilium davidii var. unicolor) by regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism. Food Chem. X 2024, 24, 101813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, N.; Wei, W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L.; Shan, W.; Chen, J.; Lu, W.; Kuang, J.; Wu, C. Postharvest Physiology and Handling of Guava Fruit. Foods 2024, 13, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pristijono, P.; Bowyer, M.C.; Papoutsis, K.; Scarlett, C.J.; Vuong, Q.V.; Stathopoulos, C.E.; Golding, J.B. Improving the storage quality of Tahitian limes (Citrus latifolia) by pre-storage UV-C irradiation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonntag, F.; Liu, H.; Neugart, S. Nutritional and Physiological Effects of Postharvest UV Radiation on Vegetables: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 9951–9972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kan, J.; Gao, M.; Dong, W.; Tang, C.; Qian, C.; Liu, J. Impact of Ultraviolet-C Light on Softening and Senescence During Storage of Peach Fruit. J. Food Biochem. 2025, 2025, 5341034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srilaong, V.; Aiamla-or, S.; Soontornwat, A.; Shigyo, M.; Yamauchi, N. UV-B irradiation retards chlorophyll degradation in lime (Citrus latifolia Tan.) fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 59, 110–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artés-Hernández, F.; Robles, P.A.; Gómez, P.A.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Artés, F. Low UV-C illumination for keeping overall quality of fresh-cut watermelon. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 51, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Cao, S.; Su, X.; Jiang, Y. Respiratory activity and mitochondrial membrane associated with fruit senescence in postharvest peaches in response to UV-C treatment. Food Chem. 2014, 161, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bolton, J.R. Calculation of ultraviolet fluence rate distributions in an annular reactor: Significance of refraction and reflection. Water Res. 2000, 34, 3315–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Response Variable | Model Parameter | Parameter Estimate | Standard Error 1 | p-Value 2 | R2 (%) 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nº of colony-forming units (CFU per plate) | Intercept | 52.10 | 1.04 | <0.0001 | |
| Slope | 3.22 | 0.11 | <0.0001 | 98.81 | |
| Quadratic coefficient | 0.0556 | 0.0023 | <0.0001 | ||
| Log10 (CFU per plate) | Intercept | 5.74 | 0.03 | <0.0001 | |
| Slope | −0.0030 | 0.0002 | <0.0001 | 96.10 | |
| Quadratic coefficient | 2.74 × 10−6 | 1.91 × 10−7 | <0.0001 |
| Treatment (UV-C) | Modulated UV-C Dose (kJ m−2) | Nº Infected Fruit/Nº Total Fruit | Anthracnose Incidence (%) 1 | Incidence Inhibition (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (Hz) | Time (s) | ||||
| - | - | 0.00 | 4/5 | 80 ± 17.89 | - |
| 15 | 30 | 0.66 | 1/5 | 20 ± 17.89 | 75 |
| 15 | 45 | 0.99 | 1/5 | 20 ± 17.89 | 75 |
| 30 | 30 | 0.66 | 1/5 | 20 ± 17.89 | 75 |
| 30 | 45 | 0.99 | 0/5 | 0 ± 0.00 * | 100 |
| 45 | 30 | 0.66 | 0/5 | 0 ± 0.00 * | 100 |
| 45 | 45 | 0.99 | 1/5 | 20 ± 0.00 | 75 |
| Variable | Treatment | Time After Storage 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Days | 7 Days | ||||
| Mean ± SE | p-Value 2 | Mean ± SE | p-Value 2 | ||
| L* | Control | 69.15 ± 0.85 a | 0.4259 | 67.51 ± 0.83 a | 0.1059 |
| UV-C | 70.22 ± 0.85 a | 69.51 ± 0.83 a | |||
| a* | Control | 10.64 ± 0.85 a | 0.0001 | 13.72 ± 0.83 a | 0.0011 |
| UV-C | 7.74 ± 0.85 b | 11.24 ± 0.83 b | |||
| b* | Control | 43.74 ± 0.85 a | 0.6330 | 42.74 ± 1.30 a | 0.1995 |
| UV-C | 43.16 ± 0.85 a | 45.19± 1.30 a | |||
| C* | Control | 45.04 ± 0.82 a | 0.5644 | 44.93 ± 1.28 a | 0.3723 |
| UV-C | 43.88 ± 0.82 a | 46.59 ± 1.28 a | |||
| h* | Control | 76.31 ± 0.60 a | 0.0007 | 72.09 ± 0.65 a | 0.0006 |
| UV-C | 79.77 ± 0.60 b | 75.90 ± 0.65 b | |||
| SS (°Brix) | Control | 9.53 ± 0.32 a | 0.2859 | 9.45 ± 0.28 a | 0.3956 |
| UV-C | 8.63 ± 0.32 a | 9.11± 0.28 a | |||
| pH | Control | 3.36 ± 0.05 a | 0.2859 | 3.24 ± 0.06 a | 0.2260 |
| UV-C | 3.38 ± 0.05 a | 3.13 ± 0.06 a | |||
| TA (% citric acid) | Control | 0.59 ± 0.03 a | 0.9212 | 0.50 ± 0.03 a | 0.0946 |
| UV-C | 0.58 ± 0.03 a | 0.58 ± 0.03 a | |||
| Firmness (N) | Control | 0.39 ± 0.08 a | 0.5644 | 0.33 ± 0.11 a | 0.0400 |
| UV-C | 0.46 ± 0.08 a | 0.70 ± 0.11 b | |||
| SS/TA | Control | 17.64 ± 1.43 a | 0.2859 | 19.43 ± 1.10 a | 0.0420 |
| UV-C | 15.42 ± 1.43 a | 16.01 ± 1.10 b | |||
| Weight loss (%) | Control | 0.63 ± 0.04 a | 0.2859 | 0.97 ± 0.16 a | 0.5529 |
| UV-C | 0.59 ± 0.04 a | 0.83 ± 0.16 a | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Silva, I.; Terao, D.; Silva, A.; Melo, W.; Fracarolli, J.; Maia, A.; Ferreira, E.; Biasoto, A. Sustainable and Innovative Postharvest Management of Anthracnose Disease in Guavas Through Modulated UV-C Light Treatment. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111351
Silva I, Terao D, Silva A, Melo W, Fracarolli J, Maia A, Ferreira E, Biasoto A. Sustainable and Innovative Postharvest Management of Anthracnose Disease in Guavas Through Modulated UV-C Light Treatment. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(11):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111351
Chicago/Turabian StyleSilva, Itala, Daniel Terao, Adriane Silva, Washington Melo, Juliana Fracarolli, Aline Maia, Ederlan Ferreira, and Aline Biasoto. 2025. "Sustainable and Innovative Postharvest Management of Anthracnose Disease in Guavas Through Modulated UV-C Light Treatment" Horticulturae 11, no. 11: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111351
APA StyleSilva, I., Terao, D., Silva, A., Melo, W., Fracarolli, J., Maia, A., Ferreira, E., & Biasoto, A. (2025). Sustainable and Innovative Postharvest Management of Anthracnose Disease in Guavas Through Modulated UV-C Light Treatment. Horticulturae, 11(11), 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111351

