Climate change represents a critical challenge for viticulture worldwide, primarily through increased heat stress, more frequent and severe drought periods, and unseasonal rainfall events. There is increasing evidence of its negative effects on both thermal regimes—potentially leading to accelerated phenology and unbalanced sugar-to-acid
[...] Read more.
Climate change represents a critical challenge for viticulture worldwide, primarily through increased heat stress, more frequent and severe drought periods, and unseasonal rainfall events. There is increasing evidence of its negative effects on both thermal regimes—potentially leading to accelerated phenology and unbalanced sugar-to-acid ratios—and hydric regimes—causing water stress that impacts berry development and final yield. The use of plastic covering in vineyards is a widespread technique, particularly in regions with high climatic variability such as the Mediterranean Basin (e.g., Southern Italy, Spain, Greece), aimed at protecting both vegetation and grapes from external factors such as hail, heavy rainfall, wind, and extreme solar radiation, which can cause physical damage, promote fungal diseases, and lead to berry sunburn. This study explores the impact of six distinct commercial plastic films, with varying optical properties, on the retrieval and accuracy of vegetation indices derived from Sentinel-2 imagery in a mid-season table grape vineyard (Autumn Crisp
®) in Southern Italy during the 2024 growing season. Laboratory spectroradiometric analyses were conducted to measure film-specific transmittance and reflectance factors from 200 to 1500 nm, enabling the development of a first-order linear spectral correction model applied to Sentinel-2 imagery. Vegetation indices (NDVI, CVI, GNDVI, LWCI) were corrected for plastic interference and analysed through univariate statistics and Principal Component Analysis. Results showed that after applying the spectral correction model, film T2 displayed the higher NDVI value (0.73). Films T3 and T4—characterised by high visible light transmittance (>39%) and low reflectance (<11% in the Red/NIR)—resulted in lower vine vigour and photosynthetic activity, with mean corrected NDVI values equal to 0.70, though still significantly higher than those of films T1 (0.65) and T5 (0.67). Films T6 and T1 were associated with greater water conservation, as indicated by the highest mean LWCI values (T6: 0.59; T1: 0.52), but lower chlorophyll-related signals, evidenced by the lowest mean CVI values (T6: 1.31; T1: 1.74) and GNDVI values (T6: 0.46; T1: 0.48). Among the corrected indices, NDVI demonstrated strong positive correlations with yield (r = 0.900) and total soluble solids per vine (TSS*vine, in kg), a key quality parameter representing the total sugar yield (r = 0.883), supporting its suitability as an index for vine productivity and fruit quality. The proposed correction method significantly improves the reliability of remote sensing in covered vineyards, as demonstrated by the strong correlations between corrected NDVI and yield (R
2 = 0.810) and sugar content (R
2 = 0.779), relationships that were not analysable with the uncorrected data; may guide film selection—opting for high-transmittance films (e.g., T2, T3) for yield or water-conserving films (e.g., T6) for stress mitigation—and irrigation strategies, such as using the corrected LWCI for precision scheduling. Future efforts should include angular effects and ground-truth validation to enhance correction accuracy and operational relevance.
Full article