Next Article in Journal
Induction and Transformation of Friable Callus in Chrysanthemum ‘Jimba’
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Host-Induced Me-chs-1 Gene Silencing on the Pathogenicity of Meloidogyne enterolobii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cloning and Functional Analysis of Flavonol Synthase Gene ZjFLS from Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomass Production and Volatile Oil Accumulation of Ocimum Species Subjected to Drought Stress

by
Sintayehu Musie Mulugeta
1,*,
Amare Tesfaw Hunegnaw
2,
Katalin Hári
3 and
Péter Radácsi
4,*
1
Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos P.O. Box 269, Ethiopia
2
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos P.O. Box 260, Ethiopia
3
Department of Entomology, Institute of Plant Protection, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ménesi Srt. 44., H-1118 Budapest, Hungary
4
Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villányi út 29-43, H-1118 Budapest, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(10), 1266; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101266
Submission received: 12 September 2025 / Revised: 8 October 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 20 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Insights into Horticultural Crop Ecophysiology)

Abstract

Ocimum, commonly known as basil, is a group of aromatic plants extensively cultivated for their aromatic leaves, flavorful seeds, and essential oils, finding applications in food and herbal medicine. Drought stress is a crucial environmental factor that has a considerable impact on basil growth and the accumulation of bioactive compounds. This study aims to evaluate how drought stress affects biomass production and volatile oil accumulation in selected Ocimum species over two consecutive years in an open-field cultivation setting. Five distinct basil genotypes, O. basilicum L. ‘Ohře,’ O. basilicum L. ‘Genovese,’ O. × africanum Lour., O. americanum L., and O. sanctum L., were evaluated under two levels of water supply, with one group receiving irrigation as a control and the other exposed to non-irrigated conditions to induce drought stress. Consistent negative impacts of drought stress on biomass production were observed in both years. The reduction in fresh herb yield varied from 16.5 g plant−1 (10.3%) for O. sanctum to 118 g plant−1 (41.7%) for O. basilicum ‘Ohre.’ Across the study years, drought stress slightly increased the essential oil content of O. × africanum and O. basilicum ‘Genovese’ by 9.8% and 26%, respectively. The essential oil composition varied considerably among the different Ocimum species and cultivars. Cultivars Ohře and Genovese had linalool as a major component, exceeding 40%. O. americanum was rich in citral compounds—neral and geranial—accounting for 26–37%, which contribute to its strong lemon-like fragrance. The hybrid O. × africanum contained high proportions of 1,8-cineole (32–38%) and limonene (14–16%), while O. sanctum was characterized by its elevated levels of eugenol (36.4–50.3%) and β-caryophyllene (26.4–38.5%). The influence of water availability on essential oil content and composition was inconsistent across species. Similarly, variations were observed in total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant capacity (AOC) depending on both species and growing year. Notably, the highest TPC (341.4 mg GAE g−1 DM) and AOC (122.9 mg AAE g−1 DM) were recorded for O. sanctum grown under drought stress during the first experimental year. In conclusion, it is recommended to irrigate the studied basil species at least twice a week under open-field conditions to minimize the negative effects of drought stress.

1. Introduction

The Ocimum L. genus, commonly known as basil and belonging to the Lamiaceae family, derives its name from the Greek word “basilikos”, signifying “royal” [1]. This genus encompasses a diverse range of annual and perennial herbs and shrubs distributed across various geographical regions. The primary areas of Ocimum diversity are tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Despite its regional distribution, basil is extensively cultivated on a global scale [2]. The genus exhibits significant genetic diversity, with around 64 species [3,4], including notable species such as Ocimum basilicum (sweet basil), Ocimum gratissimum (African basil), Ocimum americanum (American basil), and Ocimum sanctum (holy basil). Numerous varieties, related species, and hybrids exist [5,6]. The Ocimum genus is renowned for its essential oils, primarily composed of monoterpenes such as camphor, limonene, citral, geraniol, and linalool [5,7,8]. However, certain species feature essential oils rich in phenolic compounds like eugenol, methyl chavicol (also known as estragole), and methyl cinnamate, often with varying amounts of linalool [9]. Basil plants also contain polyphenolic compounds including phenolic acids (e.g., rosmarinic, caffeic, caftaric, and chicoric acids) and flavonoids [10,11,12]. These essential oils and polyphenols find applications across industries such as flavoring, fragrances, cosmetics, aromatherapy, and pharmaceuticals due to their various functional properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory effects [7,13,14].
The biosynthesis, accumulation, and distribution of secondary metabolites are strongly affected by genetic, ontogenic, morphogenetic, and environmental factors and processing methods [15,16]. Drought stress leads to a reduction in plant growth, which is a well-documented phenomenon across various Ocimum species. Furthermore, drought stress has been shown to influence the accumulation of bioactive compounds, although in a complex manner that varies across different studies and species [17,18]. Some studies report an increase in the concentration of secondary metabolites under mild to moderate drought stress. For example, drought stress has been associated with enhanced antioxidant activities and increased essential oil content in certain Ocimum species [18,19,20,21]. Conversely, severe drought stress can negatively affect the accumulation of secondary metabolites or have no effect [18,22,23]. The balance between enhanced accumulation under mild stress and reduced synthesis under severe stress highlights the complex interaction between drought stress and secondary metabolite production in Ocimum species.
Given the economic and therapeutic significance of Ocimum species, understanding their diversity, essential oil composition, and the effects of environmental stresses such as drought is crucial. Most existing research findings regarding morpho-chemical alterations in basil induced by drought primarily concentrate on O. basilicum in a controlled pot experiment. Thus, there is a scarcity of research outcomes about drought responses specific to different taxa in outdoor cultivation settings. Hence, the objective of this research article is to investigate the impact of water supply on the biomass production and biochemical characteristics of four Ocimum species under open-field cultivation. This knowledge can guide the development of improved cultivation practices, the selection of drought-tolerant cultivars, and enhanced utilization of Ocimum species in various industries.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site and Design

A field experiment was conducted over two consecutive years, 2021 and 2022, at the Experimental and Research Farm of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE) in Soroksár, Budapest. These investigations involved five different basil genotypes, O. basilicum ‘Ohře’, O. basilicum ‘Genovese’, O. × africanum Lour, O. americanum, and O. sanctum (purple variety), along with two levels of water supply, one being irrigated as a control and the other subjected to non-irrigated conditions to induce drought stress. The experiments were structured using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The seeds of the Ocimum species were obtained from the gene bank of the Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of MATE. In mid-March of 2021 and 2022, the seeds were sown in seed trays measuring 27 × 57 × 7 cm within a greenhouse. When the seedlings developed two leaves, they were transferred into 0.1 L pots. Then, during the first and second weeks of June, vigorous, healthy, and uniformly sized seedlings were transplanted into open-field plots with a 40 × 40 cm plant spacing. The plots consisted of four rows and six plants per row. There was a half-meter distance between plots and a meter between blocks. Drought treatment began two weeks after transplanting and lasted 30 days in both years. A spraying hose connected to a water meter device was utilized to apply 20 mm of water twice weekly for the irrigated treatments. Natural precipitation, which reached 220 mm in 2021 and 234 mm in 2022 throughout the experiment, was the only source of moisture for the drought treatment. The average air temperatures recorded during the experiment were 21 °C in 2021 and 20 °C in 2022. The average relative humidity was 69% and 64%, respectively. The daily weather conditions during the experiment are indicated in Figure 1 below. In addition, the soil chemical attributes are illustrated in Table 1.

2.2. Measurement of Growth Parameters

Nine plants, chosen at random, from the middle rows were used to measure the selected growth parameters. The height of each plant was measured from its base to the tip of the shoot, and the canopy diameter was measured before the plants were harvested at the widest point. After harvesting at full flowering stage, the fresh herb yield (g plant−1) was determined. Additionally, each sample plant was dried at room temperature in a well-ventilated room until reaching a constant weight, and the dry herb yield (g plant−1) was measured.

2.3. Determination of Secondary Compounds

Essential oil content (EOC): The dried samples were used to extract essential oils through hydro-distillation. The content of essential oil (mL 100 g−1 of dry mass) was measured across six replications using a bulk sample of dried leaves and inflorescences, excluding the stem. Each sample, weighing 20 g, was hydro-distilled in 500 mL of distilled water using a Clevenger-type apparatus, as recommended by the Hungarian Pharmacopeia [25]. Once the essential oils were collected, any residual water was removed, and the oils were stored in a sealed vial in the refrigerator at 4 °C for one week before analysis.
Essential oil composition: The composition of the essential oils was analyzed using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The GC analysis was performed using an Agilent Technologies 6890 N instrument with an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m length × 0.25 mm diameter, with a film thickness of 0.25 μm). The analysis started at an initial temperature of 60 °C and gradually increased to 240 °C at a rate of 3 °C per minute and the final temperature was maintained for 5 min. The injector and detector were both subjected to a temperature of 250 °C. Helium gas was used as the carrier, maintaining a consistent flow rate of 1 mL per minute, a split ratio of 30:1, and an injection volume of 0.2 μL (1%, n-hexane). To determine the relative proportions of individual compounds, the total area percentages were calculated. An Agilent Technologies MS 5975 detector (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used for component identification. The energy of ionization was 70 eV. The chromatograms obtained from full-scan mass spectra represented the total ion current (TIC). The Van Den Dool and Kratz [26] equation was used to calculate linear retention indices (LRIs). The LRIs and mass spectra were compared between homemade library mass spectra, Adams [27], and commercial databases such as NIST and Wiley. The SPME and GC samples were repeated three times for reliability.
Total phenolic content (TPC): The total phenolic content of the extracts was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method with slight modifications [28]. Firstly, half a gram of powdered and sieved plant material, with a diameter of 500 µm, was prepared. The extracts were obtained by adding 50 mL of boiling distilled water and allowing it to steep for 24 h. Subsequently, the extracts were filtered using filter paper with specific characteristics: a pore size of 10–12 µm, a weight of 85 g m−2, and a thickness of 200 µm. The filtered extracts were then stored in a freezer until further measurements were taken. During the measurement process, a test tube was filled with 40 µL of the test sample, 460 µL of distilled water, and 2.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteau’s reagent (10% v:v). After an incubation period of 1 min, sodium carbonate (0.7 M) was added to the mixture. The resulting mixture was placed in hot water at a temperature of 50 °C for 5 min. Following this, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm using a Thermo Evolution 201 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). For calibration purposes, gallic acid (0.3 M) was used as a chemical standard. A blank was prepared from distilled water. The total phenol content of the samples was expressed in terms of gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE g-1 DW). The measurements were repeated six times.
Antioxidant capacity (AOC): The FRAP assay, which measures ferric-reducing antioxidant power, was conducted following the procedure established by Benzie and Strain [29] with slight modifications. In this study, the FRAP reagent was prepared freshly by combining sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.6), TPTZ (2, 4, 6-tripyridyl-s-triazine) in HCl and a solution of FeCl3 · 6H2O (20 mmol L−1) in a ratio of 10:1:1, respectively. To perform the assay, 10 μL of the previously extracted sample and 40 μL of distilled water were added to 1.5 mL of the active FRAP reagent and thoroughly mixed. After 5 min, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm using the same spectrophotometer. In the blank, distilled water was used instead of the sample extract. As a chemical standard for calibration, ascorbic acid was employed. The antioxidant capacity of the samples was expressed in terms of ascorbic acid equivalent (mg AAE g−1 DW). The measurements were repeated six times.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The analysis was conducted using both a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a t-test. The normality of the distribution was assessed using Shapiro–Wilk’s test, while variance homogeneity was evaluated by using Levene’s test. Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test was employed to identify any significant differences in means, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. IBM SPSS 29 software was utilized for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Water Supply on Biomass Production

Water supply had a significant effect on plant height, canopy diameter, and the fresh and dry herb yield of various basil species over multiple years of cultivation, as indicated in Table 2 and Table 3. Consequently, basil plants exposed to drought stress showed shorter plant heights, narrower canopies, and lower herb yields. Based on the yearly average, height reduction ranged from 4.5 cm (19%) to 8 cm (16%) in O. americanum and O. basilicum ‘Genovese’, respectively. Similarly, the reduction in canopy diameter ranged from 6.2 cm (14.3%) in ‘Genovese’ to 9.6 cm (19.6%) in O. americanum. Hence, taxa-specific responses were observed.
Furthermore, basil plants subjected to drought treatment showed a notable decline in biomass, as depicted in Table 3. The combined average over two years indicated that the reduction in fresh herb yield ranged from 16.5 g plant−1 (10.3%) for O. sanctum to 118.0 g plant−1 (41.7%) for O. basilicum ‘Ohře’. Similarly, the decrease in dry herb yields due to drought stress varied from 4.8 g plant−1 (15%) for O. sanctum to 20.8 g plant−1 (32.0%) for O. basilicum ‘Ohře’ plants. Additionally, significant variations were observed between species and cultivation year in herb production of the Ocimum species. Ocimum basilicum ‘Ohře’ displayed the highest fresh and dry herb yield, while O. sanctum exhibited the lowest. Interestingly, all basil species reached their maximum plant height, canopy diameter, and peak biomass (both fresh and dry) production in the second year compared to the initial cultivation year.

3.2. Effect of Water Supply on Essential Oil Production

The effect of water supply on EOC and essential oil yield (EOY) in basil varied by species and year (see Table 4 below). Accordingly, drought stress increased EOC in O. × africanum in both years and O. basilicum ‘Genovese’ in the second year, but no significant differences were seen in other cases. In contrast, O. sanctum had over a 40% EOC reduction in the first year, and O. basilicum ‘Ohre’ and O.× africanum showed a 45% EOY decrease in the second year. Other species showed no significant EOY changes. Notably, O.× africanum had the highest EO content (3.0 mL 100 g−1 DM) and yield (2.0 mL plant−1).

3.3. Influence of Water Supply on Essential Oil Composition

The examined basil species exhibited varied compositions of essential oils (see Table 5 and Table 6). On average, more than 40 compounds were identified in all cases except for O. sanctum, where a total of 20 compounds were identified. In O. basilicum cultivars, linalool emerged as the predominant compound, while camphor and 1,8-cineole were the primary constituents in O. × africanum Lour. Ocimum americanum plants demonstrated elevated proportions of nerol, neral (citral-b), and geranial (citral-a). Ocimum sanctum, on the other hand, featured eugenol and trans-ß-caryophyllene as its main compounds. It was observed that the impact of water supply on the volatile oil composition varied, with taxa-specific responses. Notably, irrigation had a positive influence on linalool ratios.

3.4. Effect of Water Supply on Total Phenol Content and Antioxidant Capacity

Drought stress is known to modify secondary compound accumulation in plants including total phenolic content and their antioxidant activities. The effects of these drought-induced changes on Ocimum species were demonstrated through a multiyear experiment conducted in open-field settings. Thus, the two-year open-field study showed significant drought-induced changes in TPC and AOC (Table 7). Depending on the species, soil moisture level, and year of production, the effect could be negative, positive, or non-existent. The sweet basil cultivars ‘Ohře’ and ‘Genovese’ demonstrated a positive response to irrigation in terms of TPC in each consecutive year. Irrigation resulted in a yearly average TPC increase of 31.0 mg GAE g−1 DM (15%) and 34.6 mg GAE g−1 DM (14.8%) for ‘Ohře’ and ‘Genovese’ cultivars, respectively. Conversely, drought stress in the second year led to a 15.1% increase in TPC for O. × africanum and a 19% increase in O. sanctum. However, no significant changes were observed in TPC for O. americanum across all years. A similar pattern was noted for AOC. Consequently, in the initial year of cultivation, soil moisture level had no significant on the AOC of tested basil species. However, in the second year, irrigation affected the AOC of ‘Genovese’, O. × africanum, and O. americanum plants. Nonetheless, no significant changes in AOC were detected for the remaining species.

4. Discussion

Drought stress, a common environmental factor, can affect the physiological, growth, and biochemical responses of medicinal plants and their secondary metabolism [30,31,32]. These two-year experiments on five Ocimum genotypes demonstrated that a shortage of water supply (lack of irrigation) significantly influenced growth, development, and volatile oil accumulation. In response to water supply, basil plants undergo physiological and biochemical changes that can ultimately impact their growth and biomass production. Physiological changes in response to drought stress involve the closure of stomata to reduce water loss through transpiration. While this response conserves water, it also limits the uptake of carbon dioxide for photosynthesis [33]. As a result, non-irrigated Ocimum genotypes had shorter plants and a slender canopy, ultimately reducing both fresh and dry herb yield. Taxa-specific responses were also observed under drought stress conditions. As a result, O. × africanum suffered significant losses in non-irrigated plots. On the other hand, O. sanctum suffered less. The negative effects of drought stress on the growth and herb production of medicinal and aromatic plants are widely recognized and extensively studied phenomena that have been consistently documented by numerous scientific investigations. The constrained growth under drought stress has been previously reported in O. basilicum cultivars [17,34,35], O. × africanum [20], O. americanum [36,37], and O. sanctum [18]. It is important to note that the extent of reduction depends on the severity of the drought stress and the specific basil species. Moreover, a decrease in soil water content to 40% led to a substantial reduction in biomass production across four Lamiaceae species: lemon balm, thyme, peppermint, and marjoram [38].
The synthesis and accumulation of secondary compounds is an intricate and dynamic process governed by various biotic and abiotic factors [16]. Our two-year experiments have demonstrated significant heterogeneity and inconsistency in this process. Consequently, factors such as drought intensity, specific taxa, and year of production play a crucial role in influencing secondary compound production (EOC, EOY, TPC, and AOC). Consistent with our findings, various authors have also noted taxa and drought intensity-specific differences in the EOC of medicinal plants. Consequently, positive impacts of drought stress on EOC were observed in Ocimum basilicum cultivars [19,36,39], Ocimum × africanum [20], Thymus citriodorus [40], and Salvia officinalis [41]. Conversely, negative effects were documented for Salvia officinalis [42], Melissa officinalis L. [43], and Mentha piperita L. [44]. Furthermore, no discernible changes were reported in Ocimum gratissimum L. [45], Hyssopus officinalis [46], and Thymus vulgaris [46]. Our experiments additionally demonstrated the negative effect of drought stress on the EOY of the species. This adverse effect can be attributed to the significant constraint imposed by drought stress on biomass production, a factor directly associated with EOY. The extent of EOY reduction varies based on the specific Ocimum species and the growth environment. Furthermore, alterations in biochemical composition resulting from water availability can also negatively affect the plant’s biological activities.
Moreover, the impact of drought stress on the essential oil composition of the various Ocimum species was heterogeneous as well. In addition, a wider variability in essential oil composition was observed. This diversity highlights the dynamic nature of essential oil composition in basil species, shaped by both genetic factors and cultivation conditions. Similarly, other researchers have reported the presence of the same dominant compounds across various genotypes, though their proportions vary based on factors like geographic location, cultivation practices, and processing methods. Our study also showed variability due to irrigation and production years. Carović-Stanko et al. [47] found linalool to be the major compound in sweet basil genotypes like ‘Genovese’, while Zeljković et al. [13] identified linalool, 1,8-cineole, and geraniol as key compounds in ‘Ohře’. Scholars have also identified limonene, 1,8-cineole, and camphor as the main constituents in O. × africanum [6,18]. Additionally, Ocimum americanum was found to contain citral chemotypes (geranial and neral) and linalool [15,47]. In another study, Raina et al. [48] identified two chemotypes in thirty-two Indian holy basil accessions, high in eugenol and methyl eugenol, with significant levels of β-caryophyllene and β-elemene.
In addition to the observed variation in biomass production and secondary metabolite accumulation resulting from differences in water availability and genotypic variability, substantial disparities in biomass yield were also recorded between the two experimental years (2021 and 2022). These inter-annual variations can most likely be attributed to differences in soil physicochemical properties, as presented in Table 1, and to variations in microclimatic conditions—including air temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation—during the respective experimental periods (Figure 1). Such environmental and edaphic influences on plant growth and metabolite synthesis are well-documented phenomena in the scientific literature. Several studies have demonstrated that fluctuations in soil fertility, temperature, and moisture regimes can markedly alter plant physiological responses, biomass accumulation, and secondary metabolite profiles [15,49,50].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of water supply on biomass production, essential oil yield, and phenol content in basil species. Drought stress reduced plant height, canopy diameter, and biomass yield, while irrigation boosted fresh and dry herb production. The effect of water supply on essential oil production varied by species and year, with some species showing increased oil content under drought, while others, like O. sanctum, experienced reductions. Drought also influenced total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, with species-specific responses. Based on production-related parameters, O. sanctum was the least affected by drought stress. In contrast, drought significantly altered the productivity of O. basilicum ‘Ohře’; however, its essential oil content, total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant capacity (AOC) remained relatively stable. Overall, these findings emphasize the critical role of water management in optimizing basil growth and quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.M. and P.R.; methodology, S.M.M. and P.R.; software, S.M.M. and P.R.; validation, S.M.M. and P.R.; formal analysis, S.M.M., A.T.H., K.R.H. and P.R.; investigation, S.M.M. and P.R.; resources, P.R. and K.R.H.; data curation, S.M.M., A.T.H. and P.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.M. and P.R.; writing—review and editing, A.T.H., K.R.H. and P.R.; visualization, S.M.M., A.T.H. and P.R.; supervision, P.R. and K.R.H.; project administration, S.M.M. and P.R.; funding acquisition, P.R. and K.R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Excellence Programme of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Kalita, M.; Devi, N. A taxonomic review of the genus Ocimum L. (Ocimeae, Lamiaceae). Plant Sci. Today 2023, 10, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paton, A.; Harley, M.R.; Harley, M.M. Ocimum: An Overview of Classification and Relationships; Harwood Academic Publisher: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  3. MacCallum, D.A.; Balkwill, K. A new species of Ocimum (Lamiaceae) from Swaziland. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 145, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. World Flora Online. Ocimum L. 2024. Available online: https://wfoplantlist.org/taxon/wfo-4000026511-2023-12?page=1 (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  5. Maddi, R.; Amani, P.; Bhavitha, S.; Gayathri, T.; Lohitha, T. A review on Ocimum species: Ocimum americanum L., Ocimum basilicum L., Ocimum gratissimum L. and Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Intern. J. Res. Ayurv. Pharm. 2019, 10, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mulugeta, S.M.; Gosztola, B.; Radácsi, P. Diversity in morphology and bioactive compounds among selected Ocimum species. Biochem. Syst. Eco. 2024, 114, 104826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pandey, A.K.; Singh, P.; Tripathi, N.N. Chemistry and bioactivities of essential oils of some Ocimum species: An overview. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gurav, T.P.; Dholakia, B.B.; Giri, A.P. A glance at the chemo diversity of Ocimum species: Trends, implications, and strategies for the quality and yield improvement of essential oil. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 879–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mulugeta, S.M.; Pluhár, Z.; Radácsi, P. Phenotypic variations and bioactive constituents among selected Ocimum species. Plants 2024, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kwee, E.M.; Niemeyer, E.D. Variations in phenolic composition and antioxidant properties among 15 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bajomo, E.M.; Aing, M.S.; Ford, L.S.; Niemeyer, E.D. Chemotyping of commercially available basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) varieties: Cultivar and morphotype influence phenolic acid composition and antioxidant properties. NFS J. 2022, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dharsono, H.D.A.; Putri, S.A.; Kurnia, D.; Dudi, D.; Satari, M.H. Ocimum species: A review on chemical constituents and antibacterial activity. Molecules 2022, 27, 6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeljković, S.; Komzáková, K.; Šišková, J.; Karalija, E.; Smékalová, K.; Tarkowski, P. Phytochemical variability of selected basil genotypes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anusmitha, K.M.; Aruna, M.; Job, J.T.; Narayanankutty, A.; PB, B.; Rajagopal, R.; Alfarhan, A.; Barcelo, D. Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-genotoxic, and anticancer activities of different Ocimum plant extracts prepared by ultrasound-assisted method. Physio. Molec. Plant Path. 2022, 117, 101746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bernhardt, B.; Szabó, K.; Bernáth, J. Sources of variability in essential oil composition of Ocimum americanum and Ocimum tenuiflorum. Acta Aliment. 2015, 44, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Kong, D.; Fu, Y.; Sussman, M.R.; Wu, H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physio. Biochem. 2020, 148, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Radácsi, P.; Inotai, K.; Sárosi, S.; Hári, K.; Seidler-Łożykowska, K.; Musie, S.; Zámboriné, É.N. Effect of irrigation on the production and volatile compounds of Sweet basil cultivars (L.). Herba Polon. 2020, 66, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mulugeta, S.M.; Radácsi, P. Influence of drought stress on growth and essential oil yield of Ocimum species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Simon, J.E.; Reiss-Bubenheim, D.; Joly, R.J.; Charles, D.J. Water stress-induced alterations in essential oil content and composition of sweet basil. J. Essen. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. dos Santos, M.S.; Costa CA, S.; Gomes, F.P.; do Bomfim Costa, L.C.; de Oliveira, R.A.; da Costa Silva, D. Effects of water deficit on morpho-physiology, productivity, and chemical composition of Ocimum africanum Lour (Lamiaceae). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 1924–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rasouli, D.; Fakheri, B. Effects of drought stress on quantitative and qualitative yield, physiological characteristics, and essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. and Ocimum americanum L. Iran. J. Med. Arom. Plants 2016, 32, 900–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vilanova, C.M.; Coelho, K.P.; Silva Araújo Luz, T.R.; Brandão Silveira, D.P.; Coutinho, D.F.; de Moura, E.G. Effect of different water application rates and nitrogen fertilization on growth and essential oil of clove basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 125, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Huqail, A.; El-Dakak, R.M.; Sanad, M.N.; Badr, R.H.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Soliman, D.; Khan, F. Effects of climate temperature and water stress on plant growth and accumulation of antioxidant compounds in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) leafy vegetable. Scientifica 2020, 2020, 3808909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szolnoki, Z.; Farsang, A. Evaluation of metal mobility and bioaccessibility in soils of urban vegetable gardens using sequential extraction. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pharmacopoeia Hugarica. Pharmacopoeia Hungarica, 7th ed.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1986; Volume 1, pp. 395–398. [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Den Dool, H.; Kratz, P. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A., Jr. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phospho-tungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Analy. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Osakabe, Y.; Osakabe, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Tran, L.-S.P. Response of plants to water stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Selmar, D.; Kleinwächter, M. Influencing the product quality by deliberately applying drought stress during the cultivation of medicinal plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 42, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Hui, W.; Zhao, F.; Wang, P.; Su, C.; Gong, W. Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: A Review. Forests 2022, 13, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalamartzis, I.; Menexes, G.; Georgiou, P.; Dordas, C. Effect of water stress on the physiological characteristics of five basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Damalas, C.A. Improving drought tolerance in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) with salicylic acid. Sci. Horti. 2019, 246, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mulugeta, S.M.; Radácsi, P.; Gosztola, B. Morphological and biochemical responses of selected Ocimum species under drought. Herba Polon. 2022, 68, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khalid, K.A. Influence of water stress on growth, essential oil, and chemical composition of herbs (Ocimum sp.). Int. Agrophysics 2006, 20, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mulugeta, S.M.; Sárosi, S.; Radácsi, P. Physio-morphological trait and bioactive constituents of Ocimum species under drought stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 205, 117545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Németh, É.Z.; Szabó, K.; Pluhár, Z.; Radácsi, P.; Inotai, K. Changes in biomass and essential oil profile of four Lamiaceae species due to different soil water levels. J. Essen. Oil Res. 2016, 28, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Radácsi, P.; Inotai, K.; Sárosi, S.; Czövek, P.; Bernáth, J.; Németh, É. Effect of water supply on the physiological characteristic and production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Euro. J. Horti. Sci. 2010, 75, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tátrai, Z.A.; Sanoubar, R.; Pluhár, Z.; Mancarella, S.; Orsini, F.; Gianquinto, G. Morphological and physiological plant responses to drought stress in Thymus citriodorus. Int. J. Agron. 2016, 2016, 4165750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Govahi, M.; Ghalavand, A.; Nadjafi, F.; Sorooshzadeh, A. Comparing different soil fertility systems in Sage (Salvia officinalis) under water deficiency. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aslani, Z.; Hassani, A.; Abdollahi Mandoulakani, B.; Barin, M.; Maleki, R. Effect of drought stress and inoculation treatments on nutrient uptake, essential oil and expression of genes related to monoterpenes in sage (Salvia officinalis). Sci. Horti. 2023, 309, 111610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farahani, H.A.; Valadabadi, S.A.; Daneshian, J.; Khalvati, M.A. Evaluation of essential oil of balm (Melissa officinalis L.) under water deficit stress conditions. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  44. Khorasaninejad, S.; Mousavi, A.; Soltanloo, H.; Hemmati, K.; Khalighi, A. The effect of drought stress on growth parameters, essential oil yield and constituent of Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 5360–5365. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hazzoumi, Z.; Moustakime, Y.; Hassan Elharchli, E.; Joutei, K.A. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and water stress on growth, phenolic compounds, glandular hairs, and yield of essential oil in basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.). Chem. Biologic. Techno. Agri. 2015, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khazaie, H.R.; Nadjafi, F.; Bannayan, M. Effect of irrigation frequency and planting density on herbage biomass and oil production of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 27, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carović-Stanko, K.; Šalinović, A.; Grdiša, M.; Liber, Z.; Kolak, I.; Satovic, Z. Efficiency of morphological trait descriptors in discrimination of Ocimum basilicum L. accessions. Plant Biosys. Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Bio. 2011, 145, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Raina, A.P.; Gupta, V. Chemotypic characterization of diversity in essential oil composition of Ocimum species and varieties from India. J. Essen. Oil Res. 2018, 30, 444–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sigaye, M.H.; Lulie, B.; Yakob, A.; Nigussei, A.; Mekuria, R.; Kebede, K. Fresh herbage and essential oil yield of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) as affected by mineral fertilizers. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jnanesha, A.C.; Ashish, K.; Vijaya, K.M. Effect of seasonal variation on growth and oil yield in Ocimum africanum Lour. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Weather conditions during the experiment in 2021 (a) and 2022 (b). RH denotes relative humidity.
Figure 1. Weather conditions during the experiment in 2021 (a) and 2022 (b). RH denotes relative humidity.
Horticulturae 11 01266 g001aHorticulturae 11 01266 g001b
Table 1. Soil characteristics of experimental field.
Table 1. Soil characteristics of experimental field.
pH
H2O
Humus %KANO3-N mg kg−1P2O5 mg kg−1K2O mg kg−1Na mg kg−1Mg mg kg−1Mn mg kg−1Zn mg kg−1Cu mg kg−1SO4
mg kg−1
2021
7.991.752611.97473.86377.3145.76146.9122.142.131.8824.77
2022
7.581.7<2511.36544.43177.3630.11377.9358.484.902.4671.58
Note: KA stands for Arany Soil Plasticity Index [24].
Table 2. Effect of irrigation on plant height and canopy diameter of Ocimum species in 2021/22.
Table 2. Effect of irrigation on plant height and canopy diameter of Ocimum species in 2021/22.
SpeciesTRTPlant Height (cm)Canopy Diameter (cm)
2021202220212022
O. basilicum ‘Ohře’I43.8 ± 2.5 Aab50.3 ± 3.8 Aa39.3 ± 2.5 Ab50.2 ± 4.4 a
NI40.3 ± 4.2 Ba41.7 ± 4.0 Ba34.4 ± 4.4 Ba42.0 ± 3.8 a
O. basilicum ‘Genovese’I47.3 ± 4.9 Aa53.3 ± 4.0 a38.7 ± 4.7 Ab47.7 ± 3.7 ab
NI40.8 ± 3.6 Ba43.7 ± 2.5 a34.6 ± 4.5 Ba39.3 ± 5.4 a
O. × africanumI44.5 ± 2.2 Aab50.2 ± 1.9 a45.7 ± 4.2 Aa43.3 ± 4.0 b
NI39.7 ± 5.6 Ba41.2 ± 1.8 a39.9 ± 5.6 Ba34.2 ± 3.7 b
O. americanumI35.7 ± 1.4 Ac38.8 ± 2.1 c47.1 ± 4.2 Aa50.1 ± 2.7 a
NI30.2 ± 4.2 Bb35.4 ± 2.9 b36.7 ± 7.2 Ba41.4 ± 5.1 a
O. sanctumI42.0 ± 1.9 Ab44.5 ± 2.6 b30.9 ± 4.8 Ac33.3 ± 2.6 c
NI39.3 ± 4.9 Aa35.8 ± 2.9 b25.7 ± 5.1 A24.2 ± 3.2 c
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, where TRT represents treatment, I denotes the irrigated condition, and NI denotes the non-irrigated condition. Different letters indicate significantly different groups. Capital letters differentiate between drought stress under fixed species and small letters differentiate between species under fixed drought stress.
Table 3. Effect of irrigation on herb production among Ocimum species in 2021/22.
Table 3. Effect of irrigation on herb production among Ocimum species in 2021/22.
SpeciesTRTFresh Herb Yield (g plant−1)Dry Herb Yield (g plant−1)
2021202220212022
O. basilicum ‘Ohře’I180.1 ± 28.4 A379.7 ± 97.7 Aa38.4 ± 6.5 A74.4 ± 16.7 Aa
NI142.4 ± 43.9 B221.2 ± 6.0 Ba32.1 ± 7.2 B39.1 ± 10.5 Ba
O. basilicum ‘Genovese’I157.8 ± 31.9 Aa273.8 ± 53.0 Aab34.7 ± 6.4 A51.0 ± 10.2 Ab
NI118.0 ± 26.1 B192.2 ± 64.5 Bb26.9 ± 5.2 B32.9 ± 9.8 Bab
O. × africanumI142.7 ± 57.5 Aa269.0 ± 37.4 Ab42.2 ± 19.0 A67.7 ± 7.5 Aa
NI108.1 ± 79.2 B164.0 ± 47.8 Babc32.2 ± 17.4 B38.0 ± 10.8 Ba
O. americanumI146.9 ± 30.1 Aa214.8 ± 51.7 Ab45.9 ± 8.5 A43.3 ± 9.9 Abc
NI97.7 ± 65.8 B152.7 ± 33.9 Bbc30.7 ± 16.5 B35.4 ± 5.8 Bab
O. sanctumI85.0 ± 30.3 Ab134.8 ± 11.6 Ac32.4 ± 11.3 A32.0 ± 2.9 Ac
NI82.9 ± 28.8 A111.2 ± 14.7 Bc30.6 ± 9.9 A24.3 ± 5.7 Bb
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, where TRT represents treatment, I denotes the irrigated condition, and NI denotes the non-irrigated condition. Different letters indicate significantly different groups. Capital letters differentiate between drought stress under fixed species and small letters differentiate between species under fixed drought stress.
Table 4. Effect of water supply on essential oil production of Ocimum species.
Table 4. Effect of water supply on essential oil production of Ocimum species.
SpeciesTRTEssential Oil Content (mL 100 g−1)Essential Oil Yield (mL plant−1)
2021202220212022
O. basilicum ‘Ohře’I1.3 ± 0.2 Ab1.2 ± 0.1 Ab0.5 ± 0.1 Ab0.9 ± 0.0 Ab
NI1.3 ± 0.3 Ab1.2 ± 0.3 Ab0.4 ± 0.1 Ab0.5 ± 0.1 Bb
O. basilicum ‘Genovese’I0.8 ± 0.1 Ac0.5 ± 0.2 Bc0.3 ± 0.0 Ab0.3 ± 0.1 Ac
NI0.9 ± 0.2 Ab0.7 ± 0.0 Abc0.3 ± 0.1 Ab0.2 ± 0.1 Abc
O.× africanumI3.2 ± 0.5 Ba2.8 ± 0.0 Ba1.9 ± 0.8 Aa2.0 ± 0.1 Aa
NI3.7 ± 0.1 Aa2.9 ± 0.2 Aa1.6 ± 0.3 Aa1.1 ± 0.1 Ba
O. americanumI0.7 ± 0.1 Ac0.7 ± 0.1 Ac0.3 ± 0.0 Ab0.3 ± 0.1 Ac
NI0.9 ± 0.3 Ab0.6 ± 0.1 Ac0.3 ± 0.1 Ab0.2 ± 0.0 Abc
O. sanctumI1.0 ± 0.1 Abc0.6 ± 0.0 Ac0.4 ± 0.5 Ab0.2 ± 0.0 Ac
NI1.0 ± 0.0 Ab0.7 ± 0.0 Abc0.3 ± 0.0 Bb0.2 ± 0.0 Ac
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, where TRT represents treatment, I denotes the irrigated condition, and NI denotes the non-irrigated condition. Different letters indicate significantly different groups. Capital letters differentiate between drought stress under fixed species and small letters differentiate between species under fixed drought stress.
Table 5. Effect of water supply on essential oil composition of sweet basil cultivars.
Table 5. Effect of water supply on essential oil composition of sweet basil cultivars.
ComponentsRTLRIO. basilicum ‘Ohře’O. basilicum ‘Genovese’
2021202220212022
INIINIINIINI
limonene 8.1910280.20.30.20.20.30.50.50.4
1,8-cineole8.3810342.83.55.24.76.48.98.910.9
linalool10.76109743.240.757.540.940.841.047.250.2
camphor12.6811440.51.20.30.30.90.90.80.6
α-terpineol14.5511890.50.60.60.61.21.61.11.3
nerol16.1512270.10.1
geraniol17.29125216.610.710.012.20.40.20.1
iso-bornyl acetate18.5212840.10.50.20.21.73.11.51.7
eugenol21.4413610.71.40.80.52.32.51.41.8
ß-elemene22.5513914.85.42.93.23.32.01.61.4
methyl eugenol23.311411 13.7 0.20.2
(E)-ß-caryophyllene 23.6814191.41.70.60.70.80.40.30.2
trans-α-bergamotene24.3614370.10.22.04.24.86.45.46.8
α-humulene25.0714540.91.10.50.51.10.80.70.5
germacrene D26.1814822.73.12.01.94.22.72.72.1
α-bulnesene27.2315082.52.91.41.73.01.71.51.4
cis-γ-cadinene27.8015152.42.92.12.13.42.52.42.6
caryophyllene oxide30.2015900.20.2 0.20.10.10.10.1
1,10-di-epi-cubenole31.6716211.41.60.90.91.51.31.01.0
tau-cadinol32.2616449.711.27.57.010.08.87.97.9
Others (< 1%) 6.27.94.15.69.710.819.18.3
Total identified (%) 97.097.298.897.695.996.297.699.4
Monoterpenes 0.91.31.11.11.42.41.92.1
Oxygenated monoterpenes 65.359.675.060.453.258.261.366.4
Sesquiterpenes 17.520.512.916.625.520.818.018.1
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 12.313.99.08.913.311.910.010.4
Phenylpropanes 1.01.90.814.32.52.913.22.4
RT is retention time. LRI is the linear retention index relative to C9–C23 n-alkanes on an HP-5MS capillary column. I is for irrigated, and NI is for non-irrigated. Different letters indicate significantly different groups.
Table 6. Effect of water supply on essential oil composition of O. americanum, O. × africanum Lour., and O. sanctum.
Table 6. Effect of water supply on essential oil composition of O. americanum, O. × africanum Lour., and O. sanctum.
ComponentsRTLRIO. americanumO. × africanum Lour.O. sanctum
202120222021202220212022
INIINIINIINIINIINI
ß-pinene6.739810.1 5.45.45.74.00.1
limonene 8.1910280.60.10.10.116.216.116.114.10.2
1,8-cineole8.3810341.90.72.00.135.432.138.036.20.30.20.30.2
linalool10.76109712.522.622.19.40.10.20.60.40.70.50.40.3
camphor12.6811441.20.2 0.814.39.98.024.50.1 0.1
α-terpineol14.5511891.00.61.00.94.04.84.02.8
nerol16.15122711.69.310.110.6
neral 16.58123815.210.912.816.4
geraniol17.2012522.22.52.11.3
geranial 17.86126820.315.316.821.7
eugenol21.4413610.10.1 49.350.336.443.1
ß-elemene22.5513911.32.11.11.10.10.20.20.15.76.05.64.4
methyl eugenol23.311411 7.23.85.66.0
(E)-ß-caryophyllene 23.6814194.54.22.94.01.62.11.81.426.430.638.531.0
trans-α-bergamotene24.3614371.71.81.72.5 0.1 0.1
α-humulene25.0714541.61.40.60.96.47.66.95.72.01.82.32.1
germacrene D26.1814821.62.30.71.01.11.71.61.2 0.1
α-bulnesene27.231508 0.3 1.1
caryophyllene oxide30.2015903.02.15.07.0 3.22.74.77.0
tau-cadinol32.261644 1.90.1 0.1
Others (<1%) 9.715.411.510.814.417.915.614.73.72.93.81.0
Total identified (%) 94.495.894.293.199.098.298.598.998.999.099.195.1
Monoterpenes 1.81.51.00.926.025.724.527.10.40.20.10.1
Oxygenated Monoterpenes 69.965.970.065.759.954.463.867.21.30.80.90.7
Sesquiterpenes 16.920.212.516.313.118.014.311.636.941.849.941.3
Oxygenated Sesquiterpenes 5.77.79.29.4 0.10.30.13.73.26.29.0
Phenylpropanes 0.10.51.50.8 56.654.242.044
RT is retention time. LRI is the linear retention index relative to C9–C23 n-alkanes on an HP-5MS capillary column. I is for irrigated, and NI is for non-irrigated. Different letters indicate significantly different groups.
Table 7. Effect of water supply on total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Ocimum species.
Table 7. Effect of water supply on total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Ocimum species.
SpeciesTRTTotal Phenolic Content
(mg GAE g−1 DM)
Antioxidant Capacity
(mg AAE g−1 DM)
2021202220212022
O. basilicum ‘Ohře’I217.8 ± 21.8 Abc299.5 ± 80.6 Aa73.3 ± 10.7 Ab79.9 ± 6.3 Aa
NI200.5 ± 43.4 Bb247.8 ± 21.3 Aa70.0 ± 13.2 Ab76.7 ± 5.0 Aa
O. basilicum ‘Genovese’I252.6 ± 24.7 Ab241.8 ± 54.1 Aab83.9 ± 9.70 Aab80.2 ± 12.6 Aa
NI232.4 ± 21.8 Bb200.0 ± 20.7 Bbc110.9 ± 66.1 Aab72.1 ± 6.9 Ba
O. × africanumI208.0 ± 30.9 Ac189.1 ± 39.9 Bbc66.2 ± 16.7 Ab83.3 ± 7.2 Aa
NI187.9 ± 20.7 Ab217.6 ± 36.5 Aab79.1 ± 12.9 Aab62.6 ± 8.6 Bb
O. americanumI211.5 ± 35.8 Abc166.0 ± 5.0 Ac70.8 ± 7.9 Ab53.2 ± 6.3 Ab
NI189.6 ± 40.5 Ab157.3 ± 8.7 Ad72.4 ± 23.7 Aab48.4 ± 2.2 Bc
O. sanctumI295.8 ± 45.4 Aa143.3 ± 28.6 Bc100.7 ± 27.7 Aa45.0 ± 9.1 Ab
NI341.4 ± 84.1 Aa170.4 ± 18.8 Acd122.9 ± 12.6 Aa49.6 ± 8.3 Ac
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, where TRT represents treatment, I denotes the irrigated condition, and NI denotes the non-irrigated condition. Different letters indicate significantly different groups. Capital letters differentiate between drought stress under fixed species and small letters differentiate between species under fixed drought stress.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mulugeta, S.M.; Hunegnaw, A.T.; Hári, K.; Radácsi, P. Biomass Production and Volatile Oil Accumulation of Ocimum Species Subjected to Drought Stress. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101266

AMA Style

Mulugeta SM, Hunegnaw AT, Hári K, Radácsi P. Biomass Production and Volatile Oil Accumulation of Ocimum Species Subjected to Drought Stress. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(10):1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mulugeta, Sintayehu Musie, Amare Tesfaw Hunegnaw, Katalin Hári, and Péter Radácsi. 2025. "Biomass Production and Volatile Oil Accumulation of Ocimum Species Subjected to Drought Stress" Horticulturae 11, no. 10: 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101266

APA Style

Mulugeta, S. M., Hunegnaw, A. T., Hári, K., & Radácsi, P. (2025). Biomass Production and Volatile Oil Accumulation of Ocimum Species Subjected to Drought Stress. Horticulturae, 11(10), 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop