Effects of Different Fermentation Methods on the Quality and Microbial Diversity of Passion Fruit Wine

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript describes a research on the 1uality and microbial properties of passion fruit wine. It has elucidated the microbial properties of fungi and bacteria based on NGS. They elucidated aroma profiles.

 

Although the experimental data are abundant, the ms has several problems.

 

The position of figures is not appropriate and the ms is hard to read

 

Experimental details are not written eg p2l87 concentration of enzymes?

 

Results are not written concretely eg l178 peaked when?

 

Paragraphs are not well organized eg l208

 

Fig legends are not well described

paragraphs should be well organized

Author Response

Dear reviewer，

    We apologize for the poor language of our manuscript, we have now worked on both language and readability and have also involved English skilled person for language corrections. We really hope that the flow and language level have been substantially improved. We will be happy to edit the text further, based on helpful comments from you. 

1. We have made some adjustments to the size and position of the picture, hoping to make it easier to read.
2. We have made some adjustments to the details of the experiment, such as adding the concentration of the enzyme et al.
3. concrete results of peaked time has been added.
4. Sorry, I can't understand that "Paragraphs are not well organized eg l208". Because I carefully considered the position of the paragraphs, for example, This section (3.2.1) is divided into two paragraphs. Do you mean two  paragraphs into one ? I hope you can give me some detailed advice, and I will continue to modify.
5. We given some descriptions on Fig.  legends, eg Fig.6. Please see the attachment of fermentation-2367823-revision 2.
6. Thanks for your valuable advice again, and wish you have a nice day.

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, thank You for the chance to read very interesting manuscript. In my opinion, before publication, some minor improvements should be made. First- I encourage You to consult the whole text with English skilled (in the matter) person, since it seems that in the current version there are too much of English imperfections. I added the file with some of the texts highlighted and comments added by me. Some graphs (and fonts in them) size should be enlarged or changed into a more "readable" form. Please find my detailed comments in this file. After You will change these miscprefections I think that the manuscrpit should be published 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

I think that whole text should be checked by a skilled in the matter, preferably- native english speaking, person.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

    We apologize for the poor language of our manuscript, we have now worked on both language and readability and have also involved English skilled person for language corrections. We really hope that the flow and language level have been substantially improved.

    Thank you for giving such detailed advice, for some problems we have modified, and for some questions I will give an explanation. We will be happy to edit the text further, based on helpful comments from you. Please see the attachment.

I sincerely wish you  have a beautiful day.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf