Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Growth Inhibition of Eugenol-Loaded Nano-Emulsions against Beneficial Bifidobacterium sp. along with Resistant Escherichia coli Using Flow Cytometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrolase Activities of Sourdough Microorganisms
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing VFA Composition, Biomethane Potential, and Methane Production Kinetics of Different Substrates for Anaerobic Fermentation and Digestion
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role and Significance of Bacillus and Lactobacillus Species in Thai Fermented Foods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of a Thermostable α-Amylase through Genome Integration in Bacillus subtilis

1
Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, The College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
2
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin 300308, China
3
Industrial Enzymes National Engineering Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin 300308, China
4
Tianjin Key Laboratory for Industrial Biological Systems and Bioprocessing Engineering, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin 300308, China
5
Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-Carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin 300308, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fermentation 2023, 9(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020139
Submission received: 5 January 2023 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacillus Species and Enzymes)

Abstract

:
A carbohydrate binding module 68 (CBM68) of pullulanase from Anoxybacillus sp. LM18-11 was used to enhance the secretory expression of a thermostable α-amylase (BLA702) in Bacillus subtilis, through an atypical secretion pathway. The extracellular activity of BLA702 guided by CBM68 was 1248 U/mL, which was 12.6 and 7.2 times higher than that of BLA702 guided by its original signal peptide and the endogenous signal peptide LipA, respectively. A single gene knockout strain library containing 51 genes encoding macromolecular transporters was constructed to detect the effect of each transporter on the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702. The gene knockout strain 0127 increased the extracellular amylase activity by 2.5 times. On this basis, an engineered strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) was constructed by integrating BLA702 and CBM68-BLA702 at the AmyE and NprB sites in the genome of B. subtilis 0127, respectively. The molecular chaperone PrsA was overexpressed, to reduce the inclusion body formation of the recombinant enzymes. The highest extracellular amylase activity produced by B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) was 3745.7 U/mL, which was a little lower than that (3825.4 U/mL) of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702), but showing a better stability of passage. This newly constructed strain has potential for the industrial production of BLA702.

1. Introduction

Bacillus subtilis has long been used as a model organism for molecular research, as well as an industrial workhorse for the production of valuable enzymes [1,2]. Compared with other bacillus species, such as Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, with its more mature molecular operating systems and tools, has shown advantages in genetic regulation, enhancing the expression of heterologous proteins [3,4]. At present, using rational chassis cell engineering to construct microbial cell factories is widely regarded as an effective strategy for producing valuable industrial enzyme products [5,6,7]. Rational chassis engineering includes the deletion of undesirable intrinsic genes and negative regulation factors, the optimization of the protein secretion pathway, and the overexpression of molecular chaperones and so on [8]. The secretory expression systems of B. subtilis are a matter of concern in industrial applications and need to be further investigated and developed [9]. To date, the majority of exported proteins are transported through the general secretory (Sec) pathway, in cooperation with the signal recognition particle (SRP) [10]. However, recent proteome analysis of B. subtilis extracellular proteins has revealed that approximately 50% of these proteins were not projected in previous genome-based predictions [11]. In recent years, more and more studies have reported that certain foreign proteins without signal peptides and specific motifs can be directly secreted into the medium through an atypical B. subtilis secretion pathway [9,11]. Moreover, molecular chaperone protein PrsA, as a lipoprotein attached to the outer part of the membrane, is essential for cell viability, due to its function in assisting the folding of the penicillin binding proteins responsible for the synthesis of the cell wall [12]. PrsA may also take on other roles and there is now good evidence that it acts as a very efficient folding catalyst for exported amylases and various other enzymes [12,13,14].
In contrast to the use of plasmids as genetic carriers, genome integration ensures that heterologous genetic material is stably maintained during passage and fermentation [15]. The natural genetic transformation system of B. subtilis facilitates the integration of DNA into the genome through homologous recombination [15,16]. Since DNA replication originates at a fixed position in the genome (origin of replication), and as rapidly growing bacteria initiate new rounds of replication before the previous rounds have been completed, the copy number of integrated genes fluctuates. As a result, gene dosage rises with increasing proximity to the origin of replication [17]. Another factor that might affect the expression level of integrated genes is functioning under different promoters. According to a previous report, there was a strong gene dosage effect in fast-growing B. subtilis cells, which could amount to a 5-fold difference in gene expression [15]. However, there have been few reports on strategies and methods for efficient expression of foreign proteins through genome integration.
Recent advances in systems biology have enabled analyses of multilayer omics, including transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and macromolecular transporters, with use of statistical and computational models [2,18,19,20]. In this study, multiple novel and effective regulation strategies were developed in B. subtilis SCK6, to enhance the secretory expression of a highly thermostable amylase BLA702 from Bacillus licheniformis 702. The rational engineering of the production strain was based on a computational analysis using bioinformatics methods. Through optimized multiple rational engineering of the amylase production strain, the extracellular amylase activity was increased by 6.2 times. The final engineered genome integration strain, B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA), which has a high expression level and high passage stability, is a potential industrial production strain. The novel strategies used in this study could also facilitate basic research and biotechnological applications of B. subtilis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Chemicals

Bacillus subtilis SCK6 was obtained from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (http://www.bgsc.org) with the accession code of 1A976 [21]. Bacillus licheniformis 702, which is the wild-type production strain of the highly thermostable amylase (BLA702), was deposited in our laboratory. The plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. pMA0911 was used as a vector for heterologous expression in B. subtilis SCK6. pDG1730 was used as a vector for genome integration in B. subtilis SCK6. The chemicals and solutions were of analytical reagent grade purity and obtained from commercial sources.

2.2. Construction of the Recombinant Plasmids and Strains

All recombinant plasmids for heterologous expression and genome integration are listed in Table 1. Schematic diagrams of the plasmid construction are shown in Figure S1. The open reading frame (ORF) of the highly thermostable amylase gene was amplified from the genome of Bacillus licheniformis 702 using the primers SP-F/SP-F (Table S1). The expression plasmid pMA0911-SP-BLA702 was constructed using the golden gate method [22]. Using the same method, the expression plasmids pMA0911-LipA-BLA702, pMA0911-LipA-BLA702codon, pMA0911-YncM-BLA702, and pMA0911-CBM68-BLA702 were constructed with the related primers listed in Table S1 and using pMA0911 as the skeleton. The plasmids that overexpressed the key transporter genes increasing the extracellular expression of BLA702 were constructed based on the plasmid skeleton of pMAC68-BLA702. The related genes ytnA (0046), comEA (0572), motA (1521), crh (1951), and SpoIIQ (2143) were amplified from chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis SCK6 using the related primer pairs listed in Table S1 and inserted right after the BLA702 gene. The genome integration plasmid pDG1730 was used to insert the target genes into the amyE gene site of the genome of B. subtilis. The recombinant plasmids pDG1730-nprB and pDG1730-aprE were constructed by replacing the upstream and downstream sequences of amyE with the related homologous arms of nprB and aprE, respectively. The target genes encoding BLA702, CBM68-BLA702, and PrsA were inserted into the middle of the related homologous arms. All of the abovementioned expression plasmids and genome integration plasmids were transformed into competent cells of B. subtilis SCK6 or B. subtilis 0127 to obtain the related recombinant strains, according to the method described in our previous work [9]. The positive transformants were identified using bacteria liquid PCR with the test primers listed in Table S1. Then, sequencing confirmation followed, to obtain the recombinant strains.

2.3. Construction of the Single Gene Knockout Strain Library of Macromolecular Transporters

A macromolecular transporter analysis of B. subtilis SCK6 was performed using the online software SPLIT 4.0 SERVER (http://split.pmfst.hr/split/4/, accessed on 25 January 2021). A total of 51 macromolecular transporters were chosen to construct the single gene knockout strain library (Table S2). The strain library was constructed using a base editing method for genome editing in B. subtilis SCK6 and utilizing CRISPR/dCas9 [23]. All the N20s in this study were designed utilzing the website http://gbig.ibiodesign.net/index.html (accessed on 8 June 2021) and are listed in Table S3. The editing plasmids were constructed using a Golden Gate assembly reaction, with pBAC-dCas9-AID as the plasmid backbone [23]. B. subtilis SCK6 was transformed with 2 μg editing plasmids pBAC-dCas9-AID-gRNAtargetTS using the super-competent method [21,23]. Then the transformed cells were spread on LB agar plates supplemented with 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol and grown at 30 °C. Single colonies were selected and cultured at 30 °C overnight in LB medium containing 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol. The cultural broth was diluted to an initial OD600nm of 0.1 in 3 mL LB medium containing 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol and 0.1 mM IPTG. They were subsequently grown for a further 24 h at 30 °C. The targeted genomic regions were amplified using PCR from these cultures to verify the editing events through Sanger sequencing [23]. Thereafter, the strains containing edited plasmids were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in antibiotic-free LB medium. Subsequently, the cultures were diluted and spread on LB with and without chloramphenicol. After incubation at 30 °C for 48 h, the single colonies that had been grown on LB plates without chloramphenicol were streaked on new LB plates and grown at 30 °C with and without antibiotics, to confirm plasmid loss [23].

2.4. Fermentation of the Engineered Strains to Produce Thermostable α-Amylase

Single colonies were selected after LB plate (25 μg/mL kanamycin) activation and inoculated into fresh LB culture liquid (25 μg/mL kanamycin) for 14 h of cultivation. The culture broth was then transferred to 30 mL SR medium (30 g/L tryptone, 50 g/L yeast Extract, and 6 g/L K2HPO4) with 1% inoculum in a 250 mL shake flask. It was cultured at 37 °C and 220 rpm for 48–168 h, to express the target enzymes. The extracellular amylase activity and protein expression were measured at fixed intervals. When the genome integration strains were fermented for enzyme production, no kanamycin supplementation was used.

2.5. Production Stability of the Engineered Strains

The optimum amylase production strains B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) were selected in this study, to further compare the strain stability after successive inoculations. The two engineered strains were successively inoculated for 10 generations without the addition of any antibiotics. The tenth-generation strains of the two engineered strains were fermented using the above method, to evaluate their enzyme production capacities. The first generation strains were used as the control.

2.6. Determination of the Extracellular Amylase Activity and Protein Expression

Extracellular products were collected to simultaneously determine the amylase activity and the expression of target proteins. The amylase activity was measured according to methods reported previously, with slight modifications [5,24,25]. One unit of amylase was defined as the amount of amylase needed per minute to complete the liquefaction of 1 mg starch into dextrin at pH 6.0 and 70 °C. The calculation of the enzyme activity was based on the formula X = c × n × 16.67, where X is the enzyme activity of the sample (U/mL); c is the concentration of the control enzyme (U/mL) corresponding to the absorbance, which was obtained from the appendix of the Standard (QB/T 2306-97); and n is the fold dilution [5,25]. Extracellular protein expression was measured using a sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) method reported previously [9].

2.7. Data Analytic Methods

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The results are presented as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD) for a replication of n = 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparison of the means were conducted with a multiple range comparison LSD test. A probability value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Fusing CBM68 to the N-Terminal of BLA702, Enhancing Its Secretory Expression in B. subtilis SCK6

In our previous report, a pullulanase (PulA) from Anoxybacillus sp. LM18-11 was identified as being overexpressed in B. subtilis through a non-classical secretion pathway [9]. The N-terminal domain CBM68 may facilitate the secretory expression of the whole protein molecule. Thus, in this study, the CBM68 domain was used as a signal leader on the N-terminal of a thermostable α-amylase BLA702 from B. licheniformis 702 (Figure 1a). The recombinant fused protein CBM68-BLA702 showed similar a three-dimensional structure as that of PulA (Figure 1a). After 48 h fermentation, the extracellular amylase activities of the recombinant strain harboring fused enzyme CBM68-BLA702 showed a relative highest value of 1248 U/mL (Figure 1b). When the same enzyme BLA702 was guided by various signal peptides, such as its original signal peptide (SP), the endogenous signal peptides of B. subtilis LipA and YncM showed extracellular amylase activities of less than 250 U/mL (Figure 1b). In addition, the codon-optimized gene guided using the signal peptide LipA also showed a relatively low extracellular amylase activity (Figure 1b). Thus, we concluded that the N-terminal CBM68 domain played a vital role in enhancing the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis. Moreover, through SDS-PAGE determination of the extracellular proteins of the recombinant strains, all strains were shown to express the target enzymes at 55 kDa, using the original protein produced by the wild-type strain B. licheniformis 702 as a control (Figure 1c). However, the recombinant strain with the fused enzyme CBM68-BLA702 showed two target recombinant enzymes in the extracellular proteins after 48 h fermentation: one was at 68 kDa, which may have been the whole fused enzyme CBM68-BLA702, and the other was BLA702, which was at 55 kDa (Figure 1c). This indicated that the CBM68 domain may separate itself from CBM68-BLA702 in the extracellular environment of B. subtilis. To confirm this, we monitored the growth, extracellular amylase activity, and extracellular proteins produced during a 84 h fermentation of B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702). The results showed that extracellular CBM68-BLA702 and BLA702 were detected after 14 h of fermentation (Figures S2 and S3b). The expression of the two target proteins increased gradually between 14 and 48 h of fermentation (Figure S2). However, after 48 h of fermentation, the expression of CBM68-BLA702 was decreasing gradually, while the expression of BLA702 continued to increase (Figure S2). The highest extracellular amylase activity was achieved at 80–84 h fermentation (Figure S3).

3.2. Macromolecular Protein Transporters Effecting the Secretory Expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6

In the recombinant strain B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702), 51 macromolecular protein transporters were selected using software analysis (Table S2). Each of the transporters was knocked out from the genome of B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702), to determine the effects on the secretory expression of BLA702. As seen in the results in Figure 2a, four transporters (0127, 0059, 4127, and 3624) enhanced the extracellular amylase activity by more than 1.8 times when knocked out from the genome of B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702). Among these, knocking out ytxE (0127) enhanced the extracellular amylase activity the most (2.5 times). Moreover, five transporters (0046, 0572, 2143, 1951, and 1521) obviously decreased the extracellular amylase activity through silent expression (Figure 2a). Through overexpressing each of the five transporters in B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702), 0572 and 2143 enhanced the extracellular amylase activity by 1.62 and 1.34 times, respectively. Meanwhile, the other three transporters did not enhance the expression of BLA702 (Figure 2b). Target protein expression showed a positive correlation with the extracellular amylase activity (Figure 2b,c). Thus, the expressions of comEA (0572) and ytxE (0127) were positively and negatively correlated, respectively, with the extracellular secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702).

3.3. Genome Integration Expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6

In order to construct a production strain ofBLA702 with more stable expression, we chose to integrate the BLA702 gene into the amyE and nprB sites of the genome of B. subtilis SCK6. As shown in Figure 3a, different integration positions resulted in different extracellular amylase activities. Moreover, having two copies in the two positions resulted a relatively lower extracellular amylase activity than a single copy in one position (Figure 3a). Through detecting the protein expressions in both extracellular and intracellular inclusion bodies, we found that the double-copy recombinant strain formed many inclusion bodies after 48 h of fermentation (Figure 3b). Thus, a molecular chaperone protein PrsA was overexpressed in the double-copy recombinant strain, to facilitate the soluble expression of BLA702. The results showed that the inclusion bodies decreased remarkably by overexpressing PrsA, and the extracellular enzyme activity increased to 1230.5 U/mL after 48 h of fermentation (Figure 3).
On the above basis, multiple strategies for increasing the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6 were employed in the construction of genome integration strains. The inactivation of ytxE could slightly increase the extracellular amylase activity and reduced inclusion body formation by a certain amount (Figure 4a,c). On this basis, adding the CBM68 domain in the N-terminal remarkably enhanced the extracellular activity and protein expression (Figure 4a,b). However, quite a few inclusion bodies also formed in the cells (Figure 4c). To further decrease the inclusion body formation, comEA (0572) and PrsA were overexpressed. Both of them have the function of reducing inclusion body formation and enhancing the extracellular soluble expression of BLA702 (Figure 4). By comparison, the overexpression of PrsA had more obvious effects on enhancing the extracellular soluble expression of BLA702. The final recombinant strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) produced the highest extracellular amylase activity at 2244.3 U/mL after 48 h of fermentation (Figure 4a).

3.4. BLA702 Production and Strain Stability of the Engineered Strains

To further compare the enzyme production capacity of the genome integration strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) and the plasmid expression strain B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702), the two strains were fermented in a 500 mL shake flask for 168 h. As shown in Figure 5, B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) produced the highest extracellular amylase activity of 3745.7 U/mL at 126 h fermentation, while B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) produced the highest extracellular amylase activity of 3825.4 U/mL at 102 h fermentation (Figure 5). This indicated that B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) had the same enzyme production capacity as B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) but needed a slightly longer fermentation time.
After 10 generations of successive inoculation, without adding antibiotics, the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) showed a remarkable reduction (5.5–21.6%) in the capacity of their enzyme production (Figure 6a), while the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) showed no difference in their capacity for enzyme production with the original strain (Figure 6b). This indicated that the genome integration strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) is relatively more suitable for industrial production of BLA702.

4. Discussion

In this study, we proved that the N-terminal CBM68 domain could enhance the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis through a non-classical secretion pathway. In a signal peptide prediction analysis on the N-terminal of CBM68, no typical signal peptide sequence was found [9]. Thus, we chose to use the whole domain of CBM68 in the secretory expression of BLA702. A length of the loop was reserved for the connection with the N-terminal of BLA702, avoiding effects on the activity of the fused enzyme (Figure 1a). However, the results showed that a part of the fused enzymes (CBM68-BLA702) was truncated to BLA702 in the broth, based on detecting the molecular weight of the target proteins (Figure 1c). Moreover, with the extension of the fermentation time, more and more CBM68-BLA702 was truncated to BLA702, and after 84 h of fermentation, there was no CBM68-BLA702 left in the broth (Figures S2 and S4). According to the increase in the curve of the extracellular amylase activity during fermentation, the truncated BLA702 was the main source of enzyme activity (Figures S2 and S3). However, the specific break location of the fusion enzyme remains to be determined. or now, according to the results of this study, CBM68 at the N-terminal of BLA702 was shown to remarkably enhance the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis. Compared with the original signal peptide (SP) and the high secretion signal peptide LipA, the extracellular activity of BLA702 guided by CBM68 was up to 1248 U/mL, which was 12.6 and 7.2 times higher than those guided by the two signal peptides, respectively (Figure 1b).
As CBM68 led the proteins being secreted to the extracellular through a non-classical secretion pathway, there is insufficient information on the transporters related to the novel secretory pathway at present. Thus, we constructed a single gene knockout strain library containing 51 genes encoding the macromolecular transporters, to detect the effect of each transporter on the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702. The results showed that most of the transporters affected the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702 to varying degrees (Figure 2a). This indicated that CBM68 was transported to the extracellular through a complex transporter system, and many macromolecular transporters are required to participate in its transport. Among these transporters, we identified two key transporters, 0572 and 2143, whose knocking out almost stopped the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702 and whose overexpression remarkably enhanced the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702 (Figure 2). The gene comEA (0572) encodes a membrane-bound high-affinity DNA-binding receptor. The gene spoIIQ (2143) encodes a stage II sporulation protein. Both of these transporters may be key factors in the transport of CBM68-BLA702. Moreover, several transporters obviously obstructed the secretory expression of CBM68-BLA702, such as 0127, 0059, 4127, and 3624 (Figure 2a). The gene ytxE (0127) encodes an ABC transporter ATP-binding protein. The gene ytrF (0059) encodes an ABC transporter permease. The gene trpP (4127) encodes a tryptophan transporter. The gene gabP (3624) encodes a GABA permease. This indicated that the ABC transporters and some specific amino acid transporters may compete with the protein transport channels of CBM68-BLA702.
The single gene silencing strain B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) showed a 2.5 times higher secretory expression of BL702 than B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702) (Figure 2a). It could produce more than 2741.9 U/mL extracellular amylase after 48 h fermentation. However, the recombinant strain relies on the addition of antibiotics to stably maintain a high number of plasmids copies, which is not suitable for industrial production. Therefore, we attempted to construct genome integration strains with a high extracellular expression level in this study. The results showed that a single copy genome integration strain could only produce a maximum 552.6 U/mL of extracellular amylase (Figure 3a). To further increase the expression level of the target protein, a double-copy genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702) was constructed. However, the extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702) was lower than that of the single-copy genome integration strains, due to the formation of inclusion bodies (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The single gene silencing strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702) had a 40.1% higher extracellular activity than B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702) but was still lower than 500 U/mL (Figure 4a). When the CBM68 domain was added to one copy of BLA702, to construct the recombinant strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702), the extracellular amylase activity was up to 955.8 U/mL, which was 2.7 times higher than that of B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702). However, although CBM68 could enhance the extracellular expression of BLA702, there was still a certain amount of inclusion bodies in the cells (Figure 4c). Thus, the CBM68 domain was more suitable for adding one copy of BLA702 at a relatively lower expression level position at NprB (Figure 3a). To further decrease the formation of inclusion bodies, the two strains B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-oxaAB) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) were constructed, with a 4.3 times and 6.2 times enhancement in their extracellular amylase activity, respectively (Figure 4a). B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) showed the lowest inclusion bodies formation (Figure 4c). Compared with B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702), the genome integration strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) showed a similar extracellular expression level (3745.7 U/mL) after 126 h fermentation and a better stability of passage (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Therefore, the newly constructed strain B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68BLA702-PrsA) has potential as an industrial production strain for BLA702. Moreover, the strategies used in this work, especially the usage of CBM68 and PrsA, could provide a reference for the extracellular soluble expression of other foreign proteins in Bacillus subtilis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation9020139/s1, Table S1: Primers used in this study; Table S2: Macromolecular protein transporters in this study; Table S3: The N20 sequences of the macromolecular protein transporters; Figure S1: Schematic diagrams of plasmid construction; Figure S2: SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702); Figure S3: Growth profile (a) and extracellular amylase activity profile (b) of B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702); Figure S4: SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and H.S.; methodology, X.F. and Y.Y.; software, H.Z.; validation, X.F., Y.Y. and J.X.; formal analysis, X.Z.; investigation, X.Z. and J.X.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.Z. and Y.L.; visualization, Y.Y.; supervision, W.B. and H.S.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, H.Z. and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number 2021YFC2100405, 2021YFC2100201, and 2021YFC2100403 and Tianjin Synthetic Biotechnology Innovation Capacity Improvement Project, grant number TSBICIP-PTJJ-007-13 and TSBICIP-KJGG-009-0202.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the text of the article and the Supplementary Materials, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Meng Wang from Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for constructing the single gene knockout strain library.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lu, Z.; Yang, S.; Yuan, X.; Shi, Y.; Ouyang, L.; Jiang, S.; Yi, L.; Zhang, G. CRISPR-assisted multi-dimensional regulation for fine-tuning gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Du, G.; Chen, J.; Liu, L. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis fueled by systems biology: Recent advances and future directions. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kang, X.M.; Cai, X.; Huang, Z.H.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zheng, Y.G. Construction of a highly active secretory expression system in Bacillus subtilis of a recombinant amidase by promoter and signal peptide engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Y.; Jin, K.; Zhang, L.; Ding, Z.; Gu, Z.; Shi, G. Development of an Inducible Secretory Expression System in Bacillus licheniformis Based on an Engineered Xylose Operon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9456–9464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, F. Reducing the cell lysis to enhance yield of acid-stable alpha amylase by deletion of multiple peptidoglycan hydrolase-related genes in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, C.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.; Lu, F. Optimization of alkaline protease production by rational deletion of sporulation related genes in Bacillus licheniformis. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhao, L.; Ye, B.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, D.; Zhou, C.; Cheng, S.; Yan, X. Construction of second generation protease-deficient hosts of Bacillus subtilis for secretion of foreign proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 2052–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waldeck, J.; Meyer-Rammes, H.; Wieland, S.; Feesche, J.; Maurer, K.H.; Meinhardt, F. Targeted deletion of genes encoding extracellular enzymes in Bacillus licheniformis and the impact on the secretion capability. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 130, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhen, J.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, X.; Fu, X.; Yang, S.; Xu, J.; Song, H.; Ma, Y. Regulate the hydrophobic motif to enhance the non-classical secretory expression of Pullulanase PulA in Bacillus subtilis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ling Lin, F.; Zi Rong, X.; Wei Fen, L.; Jiang Bing, S.; Ping, L.; Chun Xia, H. Protein secretion pathways in Bacillus subtilis: Implication for optimization of heterologous protein secretion. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, L.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, D. Multimer recognition and secretion by the non-classical secretion pathway in Bacillus subtilis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Quesada-Ganuza, A.; Antelo-Varela, M.; Mouritzen, J.C.; Bartel, J.; Becher, D.; Gjermansen, M.; Hallin, P.F.; Appel, K.F.; Kilstrup, M.; Rasmussen, M.D.; et al. Identification and optimization of PrsA in Bacillus subtilis for improved yield of amylase. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Qin, G.; Zhao, X.; Shen, Y. Enhanced extracellular beta-mannanase production by overexpressing PrsA lipoprotein in Bacillus subtilis and optimizing culture conditions. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2022, 62, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Geissler, A.S.; Poulsen, L.D.; Doncheva, N.T.; Anthon, C.; Seemann, S.E.; Gonzalez-Tortuero, E.; Breuner, A.; Jensen, L.J.; Hjort, C.; Vinther, J.; et al. The impact of PrsA over-expression on the Bacillus subtilis transcriptome during fed-batch fermentation of alpha-amylase production. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 909493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sauer, C.; Syvertsson, S.; Bohorquez, L.C.; Cruz, R.; Harwood, C.R.; van Rij, T.; Hamoen, L.W. Effect of Genome Position on Heterologous Gene Expression in Bacillus subtilis: An Unbiased Analysis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Niaudet, B.; Janniere, L.; Ehrlich, S.D. Integration of Linear, Heterologous DNA Molecules into the Bacillus subtilis Chromosome: Mechanism and Use in Induction of Predictable Rearrangements. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 163, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Couturier, E.; Rocha, E.P. Replication-associated gene dosage effects shape the genomes of fast-growing bacteria but only for transcription and translation genes. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1506–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nicolas, P.; Mader, U.; Dervyn, E.; Rochat, T.; Leduc, A.; Pigeonneau, N.; Bidnenko, E.; Marchadier, E.; Hoebeke, M.; Aymerich, S.; et al. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science 2012, 335, 1103–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perez Carrillo, V.H.; Rose-Sperling, D.; Tran, M.A.; Wiedemann, C.; Hellmich, U.A. Backbone NMR assignment of the nucleotide binding domain of the Bacillus subtilis ABC multidrug transporter BmrA in the post-hydrolysis state. Biomol. NMR Assign. 2022, 16, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quentin, Y.; Fichant, G.; Denizot, F. Inventory, assembly and analysis of Bacillus subtilis ABC transport systems. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 287, 467–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.Z.; You, C.; Zhang, Y.H. Transformation of Bacillus subtilis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1151, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, D.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Xin, X.; Hu, M.; Price, M.A.; Rosser, S.J.; Bi, C.; Zhang, X. New base editors change C to A in bacteria and C to G in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, S.; Price, M.A.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Ni, X.; Rosser, S.J.; Bi, C.; Wang, M. CRISPR-dCas9 Mediated Cytosine Deaminase Base Editing in Bacillus subtilis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.H.; Lu, F.P.; Li, Y.; Yin, X.B.; Wang, Y.; Gao, C. Characterisation of mutagenised acid-resistant alpha-amylase expressed in Bacillus subtilis WB600. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 78, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, Y.; Fan, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, F. A highly active alpha amylase from Bacillus licheniformis: Directed evolution, enzyme characterization and structural analysis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Extracellular expression of BLA702 guided by various N-terminal signal peptides in B. subtilis. (a) Comparison of the three-dimensional structure between pullulanase (PulA) and the novel fused enzyme CBM68-BLA702; (b) Extracellular amylase activities of the recombinant strains guided by different signal peptides; All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (c) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins produced by the recombinant strains guided by different signal peptides.
Figure 1. Extracellular expression of BLA702 guided by various N-terminal signal peptides in B. subtilis. (a) Comparison of the three-dimensional structure between pullulanase (PulA) and the novel fused enzyme CBM68-BLA702; (b) Extracellular amylase activities of the recombinant strains guided by different signal peptides; All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (c) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins produced by the recombinant strains guided by different signal peptides.
Fermentation 09 00139 g001
Figure 2. Effects of different macromolecular protein transporters on the extracellular amylase activity. (a) Effects of knocking out each of the 51 macromolecular protein transporters; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); “***” means p < 0.001; (b) Effects of overexpression of the key transporters; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (c) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of the strains overexpressing the key transporters. C-1 means the negative control strain B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68); C-2 means the positive control strain B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702).
Figure 2. Effects of different macromolecular protein transporters on the extracellular amylase activity. (a) Effects of knocking out each of the 51 macromolecular protein transporters; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); “***” means p < 0.001; (b) Effects of overexpression of the key transporters; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (c) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of the strains overexpressing the key transporters. C-1 means the negative control strain B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68); C-2 means the positive control strain B. subtilis SCK6 (pMAC68-BLA702).
Fermentation 09 00139 g002
Figure 3. Expression of BLA702 by different genome integration strains. (a) Extracellular amylase activities of different genome integration strains; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (b) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of different genome integration strains; (c) SDS-PAGE of the inclusion bodies of different genome integration strains. M signifies the molecular weight standards of proteins; C signifies the control strain B. subtilis SCK6; E signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702); B signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (NprB::BLA702); EB signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702); EBP signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702-PrsA).
Figure 3. Expression of BLA702 by different genome integration strains. (a) Extracellular amylase activities of different genome integration strains; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (b) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of different genome integration strains; (c) SDS-PAGE of the inclusion bodies of different genome integration strains. M signifies the molecular weight standards of proteins; C signifies the control strain B. subtilis SCK6; E signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702); B signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (NprB::BLA702); EB signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702); EBP signifies the genome integration strain B. subtilis SCK6 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::BLA702-PrsA).
Fermentation 09 00139 g003
Figure 4. Different strategies for increasing the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6. (a) Extracellular amylase activity of different genome integration strains; A–F were the genome integration strains constructed using step-by-step increase strategies to improve the protein expression or secretion from the original single site (amyE) integration strain (A); SCK6 combined with amyE-BLA702 signifies integrating the BLA702 gene into the amyE site of the genome of B. subtilis SCK6; nprB-BLA702 involved adding one copy of BLA702 gene at the nprB site of the genome at the basis; ytxE (inactivation) involved silencing the ytxE gene of B. subtilis SCK6 to form B. subtilis 0127; CBM68 involved adding the CBM68 domain on the N-terminal of BLA702, which was integrated into the nprB site; comEA (overexpression) involved integrating the comEA gene into the aprE gene site of the genome of B. subtilis 0127 on the above basis; similarly, PrsA (overexpression) involved integrating the PrsA encoding gene into the aprE gene site of the genome of B. subtilis 0127 on the above basis; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (b) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of different genome integration strains; (c) SDS-PAGE of the inclusion bodies of different genome integration strains.
Figure 4. Different strategies for increasing the secretory expression of BLA702 in B. subtilis SCK6. (a) Extracellular amylase activity of different genome integration strains; A–F were the genome integration strains constructed using step-by-step increase strategies to improve the protein expression or secretion from the original single site (amyE) integration strain (A); SCK6 combined with amyE-BLA702 signifies integrating the BLA702 gene into the amyE site of the genome of B. subtilis SCK6; nprB-BLA702 involved adding one copy of BLA702 gene at the nprB site of the genome at the basis; ytxE (inactivation) involved silencing the ytxE gene of B. subtilis SCK6 to form B. subtilis 0127; CBM68 involved adding the CBM68 domain on the N-terminal of BLA702, which was integrated into the nprB site; comEA (overexpression) involved integrating the comEA gene into the aprE gene site of the genome of B. subtilis 0127 on the above basis; similarly, PrsA (overexpression) involved integrating the PrsA encoding gene into the aprE gene site of the genome of B. subtilis 0127 on the above basis; all values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3); *** means p < 0.001; (b) SDS-PAGE of the extracellular proteins of different genome integration strains; (c) SDS-PAGE of the inclusion bodies of different genome integration strains.
Fermentation 09 00139 g004
Figure 5. Profile of the extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA). All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3).
Figure 5. Profile of the extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA). All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3).
Fermentation 09 00139 g005
Figure 6. Stability of passage of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA). (a) Profile of extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. P1 signifies the original strain, P10-1∼P10-3 signify the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics; (b) profile of the extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. G1 signifies the original strain, G10-1∼G10-3 signify the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3).
Figure 6. Stability of passage of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) and B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA). (a) Profile of extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. P1 signifies the original strain, P10-1∼P10-3 signify the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (pMAC68-BLA702) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics; (b) profile of the extracellular amylase activity of B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. G1 signifies the original strain, G10-1∼G10-3 signify the single colonies of B. subtilis 0127 (AmyE::BLA702-NprB::CBM68-BLA702-PrsA) after 10 generations of successive inoculation without adding antibiotics. All values are expressed as means ± SDs (n = 3).
Fermentation 09 00139 g006
Table 1. Plasmids used in this study.
Table 1. Plasmids used in this study.
PlasmidsPropertiesReference
pMA0911-SP-BLA702E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), SP signal peptide,
highly thermostable amylase gene
In this work
pMA0911-LipA-BLA702E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), LipA signal peptide,
highly thermostable amylase gene
In this work
pMA0911-LipA-BLA702codonE.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), LipA signal peptide,
Codon optimized gene sequence of BLA702
In this work
pMA0911-YncM-BLA702E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), YncM signal peptide,
High thermostable amylase gene
In this work
pMA0911-CBM68-BLA702E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68 domain,
highly thermostable amylase gene
In this work
pMAC68-BLA702-0046E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68-BLA702, ytnA gene
In this work
pMAC68-BLA702-0572E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68-BLA702, comEA gene
In this work
pMAC68-BLA702-1521E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68-BLA702, motA gene
In this work
pMAC68-BLA702-1951E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68-BLA702, crh gene
In this work
pMAC68-BLA702-2143E.coli/B. subtilis shuttle plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Kanr (B. subtilis), CBM68-BLA702, SpoIIQ gene
In this work
pDG1730-BLA702B. subtilis integrative plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Spcr (B. subtilis), upstream and downstream sequences of homologous gene amyE, sandwiched between them is the BLA702 gene
In this work
pDG1730-nprB-BLA702/CBM68-BLA702B. subtilis integrative plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Spcr (B. subtilis), upstream and downstream sequences of homologous gene nprB, sandwiched between them is the BLA702 or CBM68-BLA702 gene
In this work
pDG1730-aprE-PrsAB. subtilis integrative plasmid, Ampr (E. coli),
Spcr (B. subtilis), upstream and downstream sequences of homologous gene aprE, sandwiched between them is the chaperonin PrsA gene
In this work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Fu, X.; Zhao, X.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Bai, W.; Song, H. Overexpression of a Thermostable α-Amylase through Genome Integration in Bacillus subtilis. Fermentation 2023, 9, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020139

AMA Style

Yang Y, Fu X, Zhao X, Xu J, Liu Y, Zheng H, Bai W, Song H. Overexpression of a Thermostable α-Amylase through Genome Integration in Bacillus subtilis. Fermentation. 2023; 9(2):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Yifan, Xiaoping Fu, Xingya Zhao, Jianyong Xu, Yihan Liu, Hongchen Zheng, Wenqin Bai, and Hui Song. 2023. "Overexpression of a Thermostable α-Amylase through Genome Integration in Bacillus subtilis" Fermentation 9, no. 2: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020139

APA Style

Yang, Y., Fu, X., Zhao, X., Xu, J., Liu, Y., Zheng, H., Bai, W., & Song, H. (2023). Overexpression of a Thermostable α-Amylase through Genome Integration in Bacillus subtilis. Fermentation, 9(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop