Next Article in Journal
Influence of Fermentation Conditions (Temperature and Time) on the Physicochemical Properties and Bacteria Microbiota of Amasi
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates

1
Department of Food and Biotechnology, South Ural State University (National Research University), 76 Lenin Avenue, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia
2
Laboratory of Scientific and Methodological Work and Control and Analytical Research, V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Talalikhina St., 109316 Moscow, Russia
3
Engineering and Technology Faculty, Shakarim University, 20a Glinka Str., Semey 071412, Kazakhstan
4
Center for Biotechnology of Animal Reproduction, South Ural State Agrarian University, 13 Gagarin Str., 457100 Troitsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(2), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020056
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Fermentation for Food and Beverages)

Abstract

:
When slaughtering and processing poultry, large quantities of meat by-products are generated; therefore, the development of the newest methods for processing secondary raw materials is an urgent problem. Animal proteins have relevant technological applications and are also considered as a potential source of bioactive peptides. Current technologies suggested that protein substances can be isolated from meat co-products through microbial hydrolysis. The purpose of the study was to optimize the technological parameters of microbial hydrolysis of hen combs and to analyze the modification of the microstructure and properties of hydrolyzed by-products under the action of bacterial enzymes. Hen’s combs were hydrolyzed by bifidobacteria and concentrated Propionix liquid. A multifactorial experiment was used to determine the optimal conditions for the hydrolysis process. As a result of the study, multiple regression equations and response surfaces were obtained, which describe the process of hydrolysis of hen combs to identify the optimal hydrolysis parameters. Temperature, amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period are factors that have a significant impact on the degree of hydrolysis. The results of microscopic and dispersed analysis confirm the good hydrolyzability of combs due to changes in structural components and an increase in the amount of smaller protein particles.

1. Introduction

Large amounts of meat by-products are generated during slaughtering and poultry processing, and these products require rational and ecological management. Innovative developments allow creating ingredients with high added-value from chicken by-products with the least environmental impact, handling and disposal costs.
The most valuable component of raw meat materials are proteins. In this way, by-product and waste from meat processes can be collected as a source of proteins [1,2]. Some proteins of animal origin have relevant technological applications to form the structure of food systems, for binding water, gelation, foaming and emulsification, while protein hydrolyzates may contribute to a better digestibility and taste quality of food [3,4]. Protein hydrolyzates from meat by-products are considered as a potential source of flavor-enhancing ingredients [5]. During protein hydrolysis products with physiological effects can be generated, such as bioactive peptides for applications in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industry [6]. The major bioactivities of peptides are antihypertensive, antioxidant, antithrombotic, and antimicrobial [7,8,9].
Current technologies suggest that bioactive substances can be created from by-product through enzymatic hydrolysis [10,11]. Proteins from meat by-product are hydrolyzed with proteolytic enzymes under controlled parameters to generate bioactive peptides. Scientific substantiation of the effectiveness of the commercial enzymes application for protein hydrolysis has been made, such as pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and papain, and also enzymes from microbial origin such as neutrase and alcalase [6,11,12]. In previous studies, we have proved the possibility of hydrolysis of meat raw materials and by-products with bacterial concentrates. The advantages of using bacterial starter cultures in comparison with individual enzymes are the better adaptation of microbial enzymes to different environments, as well as the accumulation of biologically valuable ingredients of bacterial metabolism in hydrolysates [13,14].
Exopeptidases and endopeptidases can release large protein fragments and polypeptides, but they also contribute to the production of individual peptides and free amino acids. Peptides with sequences between 2 and 20 amino acids give the most bioactivity and therefore, the main technological problems are associated with obtaining the hydrolyzates, containing peptides with low molecular weight [15].
When fermenting poultry by-products with microbial enzymes, an important issue is the development of rational process conditions for obtaining low-molecular-weight hydrolysates of animal protein. By changing such fermentation parameters as the hydrolysis period, the temperature and the concentration of microorganisms, it is possible to regulate the yield and properties of the final product. Mathematical modeling is a modern method for optimizing biotechnological processes [11,16].
The purpose of the study was to optimize the technological parameters of microbial hydrolysis of hen combs and to analyze the modification of the microstructure and properties of hydrolyzed by-products under the action of bacterial enzymes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and Ingredients

The combs were obtained by slaughtering 300 hens of the parent stock at the age of 11 months (average weight 4 kg). The combs were manually removed from the heads, washed, packaged in plastic bags and frozen at −18 °C. Frozen combs were transported in a refrigerator to the laboratory of the Food and Biotechnology Department within 2 h for further processing. The proximate composition of the combs (%): moisture content—71.82; protein content—14.81; fat content—10.47; ash content—1.26.
Sterilized cheese whey was used to treat the combs. The proximate composition of the cheese whey (%): moisture content—93.12; protein content—0.96; fat content—0.37; ash content—0.61.
The following bacterial concentrates produced by Propionix company (Moscow, Russia), were used for biotechnological processing of hen combs:
Bifidobacteria liquid concentrate (BLC) is a concentrated microbial mass of the Bifidobacterium longum B379M strain with an activity of 1011–1012 CFU/cm3.
Propionix liquid concentrated starter culture (Propionix LCSC) is a concentrated microbial mass of the Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp strain shermanii-KM 186, the bacteria of which are in the active form—1010–1011 CFU/cm3.

2.2. Biotechnological Treatment of the Combs

Hen’s combs chopped in a meat grinder (Binatone, MFP 076) were defatted three times with a mixture of chloroform: methanol (2:1), shaking for 2 h. Sterilized cheese whey was added to the defatted mass of the combs in a ratio of 1:8 and homogenized (Stegler DG-360). To produce the experimental samples, liquid concentrates of bacteria were added to the obtained homogenates in an amount of 5%, 10%, and 15% to the mass of the combs and thoroughly mixed. The control sample of the homogenate did not contain the bacterial concentrate. The homogenates were hydrolyzed in a thermostat for 12 h at temperatures of 30, 35, and 40 °C.

2.3. Optimization of Hydrolysis

A multifactorial experiment was used to determine the optimal conditions for the hydrolysis process.
The multiple regression equation and the response surface methodology were used to determine the optimal values of independent variables. The change in the variable, the degree of hydrolysis (DH), was evaluated under the effect of three factors: X1—temperature (30–40 °C in 5 °C steps); X2—the amount of bacterial concentrate (5–15% in 5% steps); X3—the hydrolysis period (4–12 h in 4 h steps). A total of 17 runs were proposed in this model, including three replicas at the central point.
The degree of hydrolysis (DH, %) was calculated by the formula:
D H = ( N A A N A A 0 N O A N A A 0 ) × 100 %
where NOA—content of total nitrogen, %; NAA0—amine nitrogen in the non-hydrolyzed combs, %; NAA—the content of amine nitrogen in the hydrolysate after hydrolysis for a certain period of time, %.
The content of total nitrogen, amine nitrogen in the non-hydrolyzed combs and the resulting hydrolysates was determined by the biuret method.
Effect of independent variables on the dependent variable (DH) was analyzed using MathCAD (PTC:order #2456861 #2497812). The following indicators of the obtained multiple regression equation were determined: regression coefficients, the reliability of the equation by the coefficient of determination (R2) and Fisher’s criterion (Fkr), the statistical significance of the parameters of the multiple regression equation by the Student’s test (t). The partial correlation coefficient (β) was calculated to assess the validity of including independent variables in the regression model.
In general, the equation of the three-factor experiment looks like this:
Y = b0 + b1·X1 + b2·X2 + b3·X3 + b12·X1·X2 + b13 ·X1·X3 + b23·X2·X3 + b123·X1·X2·X3 + b11·X12+ b22·X22 + b33·X32

2.4. Determination of Chemical Properties

The titrated acidity and the active acidity in the hydrolysates were analyzed in dynamics after 0, 4, 8 and 12 h of hydrolysis. The active acidity was measured on a portable pH-meter (HANNA HI83141). The titrated acidity was analyzed by neutralizing the hydrolysate solution (in a ratio of 1:5 with water) with 0.1 N NaOH, the values were expressed in degrees of lactic acid.

2.5. Determination of Free Amino Acids in Comb Hydrolysates

The content of unbound (free) amino acids was determined on an Agilent 1260 Infinity LC liquid chromatograph using a C18 PA column (3.5 μm, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, ZORBAX) as the stationary phase. The following were used as the mobile phase: A—acetonitrile: methanol: water (45:45:10); C—pH 8.2, Na2HPO4 1.42 g, and Na2B4O7 2.1 g. Samples were prepared by liquid extraction with preliminary addition of 20% trichloroacetic acid to precipitate proteins and peptides. After adding acidified hydrochloric acid buffer with pH 2.2 and holding the homogenate under cooling conditions, the mixture was centrifuged (20 min, 4 °C, 10,000 g) and the supernatant was passed through a syringe filter into a vial.
Orthophthalaldehyde was used as derivatizing agents for primary amino acids and 9-fluoromethyl chloroformate for secondary amino acids.
The content of free amino acids was expressed in units: mg of AA per 100 g of liquid hydrolyzates.

2.6. Determination of the Dispersed Composition

The study of the dispersed composition and the analysis of the particle size in the hydrolysates samples were carried out by the method of laser dynamic light scattering on a laser diffraction analyzer Microtrac S3500.

2.7. Investigation of Microstructure

For microstructural analysis, the fermented by-products were kept in a 40% formalin solution for 72 h to hardening the consistency. The microstructure modification of comb’s hydrolyzates during biotechnological processing was studied by microscopy of stained histopreparations using a microscope LEICA DMRXA (Germany, Wetzlar). The sections of the samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and picro-fuchin according to the Van Gieson method. Using a digital video camera LEICA DFC 290 (Germany, Wetzlar), images of micro-preparations were obtained in the format of graphic TIFF files in the RGB colour space.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed in five replicates, and each measurement was repeated three times. Results were expressed as the mean values of the five replicates ± the standard deviation. Probability values of p ≤ 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance. The data were analysed via one-way ANOVA analysis of variance using the free web-based software offered by Assaad et al. [17].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of Hydrolysis

Hydrolyzates with a high degree of hydrolysis (DH) and yield are obtained during enzymatic hydrolysis of waste and by-product [16,18]. The degree of hydrolysis (DH) characterizes the degree of enzymatic cleavage of a protein substrate peptide under the effect of various factors: hydrolysis time, reaction pH, enzyme concentration, reaction temperature [19].
The multiple regression equation and the response surface methodology were used to determine the optimal values of independent variables. The change in the variable, the degree of hydrolysis (DH), was evaluated under the effect of three factors: temperature (X1), the amount of bacterial concentrate (X2), and the hydrolysis period (X3). A total of 17 runs were proposed in this model, including three replicas at the central point.
The central composite rotary structure was used to determine the optimal conditions for the process of hydrolysis (Table 1).
As a result of optimization, multiple regression equations were obtained for the hydrolysis process of the hen combs by Propionix LCSC (DH1h) and BLC (DH2h):
DH1h = 6.560 + 1.744·X1 + 0.367·X2 + 2.518·X3 + 0.387·X1·X3 + 0.573·X2·X3
DH2h = 7.427 + 0.951·X1 + 0.283·X2 + 2.598·X3 + 0.320·X2·X3
where X1 is the temperature (°C), X2 is the amount of bacterial concentrate (%), and X3 is the hydrolysis period (h).
The statistical significance of the equations has been proved by Student’s criterion. Based on the maximum partial correlation coefficient, we conclude that the factor X3 has the most essential effect on the hydrolysis. When comparing the p-values within the independent variables, a high degree of reliability of the regression coefficients for the temperature (X1) (p ≤ 0.001; p ≤ 0.01) and the hydrolysis period (X3) (p ≤ 0.001) was noted (Table 2).
At the 3D response levels, the dependent variable was fixed at the central level (Z-axis), and the influence of two independent variables on the response was fixed on the Y and X axes (Figure 1). According to the designed models of the response surface, the most optimal values of the factors were set as follows: for combs hydrolyzing by Propionix LCSC: the temperature—41.92–43.43 °C; the amount of bacterial concentrate—13.09–13.94%; the hydrolysis period—11.41 h. With these optimal process parameters, the degree of hydrolysis can be at the level of 14.40–14.88% (Figure 1). Within the studding parameters, an increase in the yield of hydrolyzed product was observed with a cooperative increase in temperature (up to 43.43 °C), amount of bacterial concentrate (up to 13.94%), and hydrolysis period (up to 11.41 h). A further increase in these parameters has a less significant effect on the degree of hydrolysis.
The most optimal values of the factors for hen combs hydrolyzing by BLC were set as follows: the temperature—39.7 °C, the amount of bacterial concentrate—10.19–10.69%, the hydrolysis period—10.04–12.29 h, the degree of hydrolysis—12.16–14.27% (Figure 2). According to the applied methodology, we observe the correspondence of the most effective temperature and the degree of hydrolysis when comparing various reaction parameters. When analyzing the results of studying the hydrolysis of raw materials, it was noted that the degree of hydrolysis varies significantly depending on the type of by-products, enzyme activity and process parameters [16,19,20].

3.2. Chemical Properties

Changes in the temperature and pH of the substrate can affect the proteolytic activity of exogenous enzymes and, as a consequence, can enhance the intensity of the biopolymers destruction [21]. The acidity of the biotechnological systems is formed as a result of the accumulation of fermentation products, primarily organic acids. The level of active and titratable acidity allows us to assess the intensity of the hydrolysis processes of poultry by-products.
When studying the dynamics of active acidity, it was found that the pH level after 12 h of hydrolysis at a temperature of 30 °C reached 5.83–5.96 under the action of propionic acid bacteria enzymes and 5.80–5.86 under the action of bifidobacteria enzymes.
The most significant acid accumulation during fermentation of hen combs was observed at temperatures of 35 and 40 °C. Thus, at a temperature of 40 °C, the pH values reached a level of 3.80–4.03 at the end of the hydrolysis process, and the concentration of bacterial starters did not significantly affect this indicator. If the hydrolysis proceeded at high temperatures, then the pH level decreased most intensively in the first 4 h—by 26.6–28.5% (Figure 3). The hydrolysis processes of the hen combs proceeded more efficiently, when treated with propionic acid bacteria compared to the fermentation under the bifidobacteria enzymes. Thus, within 12 h of fermentation with propionic bacteria, the titratable acidity reached values of 0.57–0.65 degrees at 35 °C; and 0.74–0.82 degrees—at 40 °C (Figure 4).
The obtained data are consistent with the results of regression analysis of parameters for hen combs hydrolysis, where the optimal conditions of the fermentation process were established: temperature 39.7–43.4 °C, hydrolysis period—10.0–12.3 h.
The authors noted that microbial proteases can interact with proteins in the fermented meat at a certain pH and temperature [22,23,24].

3.3. Dispersed Composition, Free Amino Acids and Microstructure of the Comb Hydrolysates

Studies of the dispersed composition of the comb hydrolysates have shown that the particle size in samples treated with bacterial concentrates decreased (Figure 5), which is associated with the cleavage of proteins into simpler peptides under the action of enzymes produced by microorganisms. Thus, the average particle size in the dispersed comb hydrolysate system decreased by 21% in the sample treated with bifidobacteria, and by 44% in the sample treated with propionic acid bacteria compared to control. Wilkins et al. [25] determined the correlation between the size of the molecule and the length of the polypeptide chain based on the measurement of the hydrodynamic radius of proteins. It was noted that the protein is cleaved by enzymes into peptides with different molecular weights and free amino acids [26,27].
This is consistent with our free amino acid results (Table 3), which showed an increase in free amino acids in fermented hen comb samples. Thus, the total amount of free amino acids in the samples fermented by propionic acid bacteria increased by 75%, and by bifidobacterial—by 24%. At the same time, there were more free essential amino acids after hydrolysis by bifidobacteria, in particular, such amino acids as methionine, phenylalanine, leucine and isoleucine. It has been noted that by-products contain essential amino acids such as lysine, methionine, and tryptophan [1].
The effect of various bacterial concentrate on the microstructural properties of the combs samples was observed at magnification 800 (Figure 6).
In the preparations of the control sample, cells and their nuclei are clearly visible, with a good perception of histological dyes. The extracellular matrix is represented by randomly located collagen fibers. In the deep tissues, layers of adipose tissue are visible, separated by thick connective tissue septa, consisting mainly of compactly packed collagen fibers (Figure 6(1a,1b)). In experimental samples treated with bacterial concentrates, the histological structure is clearly visualized. Compared to the control sample (Figure 6(2a)), attention is drawn to the reduced perception of histological dyes and the fuzziness of the connective tissue matrix, as well as fuzzy boundaries of cellular elements and their nuclei (Figure 6(3a,4a)). When stained with picro-fuchsin by the Van Gieson method, the experimental samples show a diffuse pinkish-crimson staining in all fields of view (Figure 6(3b,4b)).
In the control group, fields free of collagen fibers (for example, bundles of smooth muscle fibers) are colored yellow with picric acid (Figure 6(1b)). The noted phenomenon is associated with collagen hydrolysis and diffusion of the hydrolyzate through the tissue. Under the action of organic acids produced by lactic acid and propionic acid bacteria, collagen fibers swell and the raw materials soften [28].
A complex of proteolytic enzymes secreted by bacteria during metabolism promotes the breakdown of muscle and collagen fibers. The destructive effect of lactic acid on animal tissue was noted by Aktas and Kaya [29]. The beneficial effect of fermentation on the microstructure of animal tissues was identified by Rawdkuen and Benjakul [30]. Thus, the results of microstructural studies show that when combs are treated with bacterial concentrates, changes occur in the microstructure of connective tissue—the breakdown of collagen bundles into individual fibrils.

4. Conclusions

The results of the study showed that the fermentation with a concentrates of bifidobacteria and propionic acid bacteria has a positive effect on the hydrolysis of hen combs. Multiple regression equations and response surface methodology was used to describe the process of hydrolysis of hen combs to determine the optimal hydrolysis parameters. All technological parameters have a significant impact on the degree of hydrolysis. A higher temperature and a longer hydrolysis period increased the level of hydrolysis, while the effect of the amount of bacterial concentrate depended on the type of microorganisms.
The results of biochemical, microscopic and dispersed analysis confirm the combs hydrolyzability due to an increase in the pH level and titratable acidity, changes in structural components, and an increase in the amount of smaller protein particles.
This study illustrates that hydrolysates derived from hen by-products might become a potential protein source as functional ingredients in food systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.Z.; methodology, O.Z. and S.M.; investigation, O.Z., S.M., M.R., P.B. and A.K.; data curation and analysis, O.Z., S.M. and G.Z.; supervision, O.Z.; writing—original draft, O.Z. and S.M.; writing—article and editing O.Z. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by a grant of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for large scientific projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (subsidy identifier 075-15-2020-775).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available up on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank managers of Scientific and Educational Center of Nanotechnology of South Ural State University for their technical support during this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mullen, A.M.; Álvarez, C.; Zeugolis, D.I.; Henchion, M.; O’Neill, E.; Drummond, L. Alternative uses for co-products: Harnessing the potential of valuable compounds from meat processing chains. Meat Sci. 2017, 132, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brandelli, A.; Sala, L.; Kalil, S.J. Microbial enzymes for bioconversion of poultry waste into added-value products. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ahmad, T.; Ismail, A.; Ahmad, S.A.; Khalil, K.A.; Kumar, Y.; Adeyemi, K.D.; Sazili, A.Q. Recent advances on the role of process variables affecting gelatin yield and characteristics with special reference to enzymatic extraction: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 63, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Toldrá, F.; Reig, M.; Mora, L. Management of meat by- and co-products for an improved meat processing sustainability. Meat Sci. 2021, 181, 108608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Iwaniak, A.; Minkiewicz, P.; Darewicz, M.; Hrynkiewicz, M. Food protein originating peptides as tastants-physiological, technological, sensory, and bioinformatic approaches. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Toldrá, F.; Reig, M.; Aristoy, M.C.; Mora, L. Generation of bioactive peptides during food processing. Food Chem. 2018, 267, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Herregods, G.; Camp, J.V.; Morel, N.; Ghesquière, B.; Gevaert, K.; Vercruysse, L.; Dierckx, S.; Quanten, E.; Smagghe, G. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of gelatin hydrolysates and identification of bioactive peptides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Verma, A.K.; Chatli, M.K.; Kumar, P.A.V.A.N.; Mehta, N. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of protein hydrolysate extracted from porcine liver. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 87, 711–717. [Google Scholar]
  9. Borrajo, P.; Pateiro, M.; Barba, F.J.; Mora, L.; Franco, D.; Toldrá, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Peptides Extracted from Meat By-products: A Review. Food Anal. Meth. 2019, 12, 2401–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adhikari, B.B.; Chae, M.; Bressler, D.C. Utilization of slaughterhouse waste in value-added applications: Recent advances in the development of wood adhesives. Polymers 2018, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bezerra, T.; Estévez, M.; Lacerda, J.T.; Dias, M.; Juliano, M.; Mendes, M.A.; Morgano, M.; Pacheco, M.T.; Madruga, M. Chicken Combs and Wattles as Sources of Bioactive Peptides: Optimization of Hydrolysis, Identification by LC-ESI-MS2 and Bioactivity Assessment. Molecules 2020, 25, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ryder, K.; Bekhit, A.E.D.; McConnell, M.; Carne, A. Towards generation of bioactive peptides from meat industry waste proteins: Generation of peptides using commercial microbial proteases. Food Chem. 2016, 208, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zinina, O.; Merenkova, S.; Soloveva, A.; Savostina, T.; Sayfulmulyukov, E.; Lykasova, I.; Mizhevikina, A. The effect of starter cultures on the qualitative indicators of dry fermented sausages made from poultry meat. Agron. Res. 2018, 16, 2265–2281. [Google Scholar]
  14. Merenkova, S.; Zinina, O.; Loretz, O.; Neverova, O.; Sharaviev, P. Effect of transglutaminase and bacterial concentrates on the development of functional and technological properties of minced meat. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2019, 69, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, H.; Fan, H.; Chalamaiah, M.; Wu, J. Preparation of low-molecular-weight, collagen hydrolysates (peptides): Current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Teshnizi, Z.M.; Robatjazi, S.M.; Mosaabadi, J.M. Optimization of the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastes Using Alcalase Enzyme for the Preparation of Protein Hydrolysates. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2020, 7, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  17. Assaad, H.; Zhou, L.; Carroll, R.J.; Wu, G. Rapid publication-ready MS-Word tables 597 for one-way ANOVA. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Santos, B.A.S.; Azambuja, S.P.H.; Ávila, P.F.; Pacheco, M.T.B.; Goldbeck, R. n-Butanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae from protein-rich agro-industrial by-products. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kurozawa, L.; Park, K.; Hubinger, M. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of chicken meat using response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lindberg, D.; Kristoffersen, K.A.; Vogel-van den Bosch, H.; Wubshet, S.G.; Böcker, U.; Rieder, A.; Nils, E.F.; Afseth, K. Effects of poultry raw material variation and choice of protease on protein hydrolysate quality. Process. Biochem. 2021, 110, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lafarga, T.; Hayes, M. Bioactive peptides from meat muscle and by-products: Generation, functionality and application as functional ingredients. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sun, F.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H.; Kong, B.; Xia, X. Purification and biochemical characteristics of the microbial extracellular protease from Lactobacillus curvatus isolated from Harbin dry sausages. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, F.; Tao, R.; Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Kong, B. Effects of temperature and pH on the structure of a metalloprotease from Lactobacillus fermentum R6 isolated from Harbin dry sausages and molecular docking between protease and meat protein. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5016–5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thoresen, P.P.; Alvarez, R.G.; Vaka, M.R.; Rustad, T.; Sone, I.; Fernandez, E.N. Potential of innovative pre-treatment technologies for the revalorisation of residual materials from the chicken industry through enzymatic hydrolysis Innovative. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 64, 102377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilkins, D.K.; Grimshaw, S.B.; Receveur, V.; Dobson, C.M.; Jones, J.A.; Smith, L.J. Hydrodynamic Radii of Native and Denatured Proteins Measured by Pulse Field Gradient NMR Techniques. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 16424–16431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, Y.; Wu, Z.; Dai, Z.; Wang, G.; Wu, G. Protein hydrolysates in animal nutrition: Industrial production, bioactive peptides, and functional significance. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Glomm, W.R.; Wubshet, S.G.; Lindberg, D.; Dankel, K.R.; Afseth, N.K.; Stenstad, P.M.; Johnsen, H. Immobilized protease on magnetic particles for enzymatic protein hydrolysis of poultry by-products. LWT 2021, 152, 112327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biavati, B.; Vescovo, M.; Torriani, S.; Bottazzi, V. Bifidobacteria: History, ecology, physiology and applications. Ann. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 117–131. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aktas, N.; Kaya, M. The influence of marinating with weak organic acids and salts on the intramuscular connective tissue and sensory properties of beef. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 213, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rawdkuen, S.; Benjakul, S. Biochemical and microstructural characteristics of meat samples treated with different plant proteases. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 14088–14095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The 3D surface plots of hydrolysis degree of hen combs treated with Propionix LCSC as a function of factors: (a) interactions of temperature and hydrolysis period on DH; (b) interactions of temperature and the amount of bacterial concentrate; (c) interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH; (d) contour plots of degree of hen combs hydrolysis as a function of interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH.
Figure 1. The 3D surface plots of hydrolysis degree of hen combs treated with Propionix LCSC as a function of factors: (a) interactions of temperature and hydrolysis period on DH; (b) interactions of temperature and the amount of bacterial concentrate; (c) interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH; (d) contour plots of degree of hen combs hydrolysis as a function of interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH.
Fermentation 08 00056 g001
Figure 2. The 3D surface plots of hydrolysis degree of hen combs treated with BLC as a function of factors: (a) interactions of temperature and hydrolysis period on DH; (b) interactions of temperature and the amount of bacterial concentrate; (c) interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH; (d) contour plots of degree of hen combs hydrolysis as a function of interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH.
Figure 2. The 3D surface plots of hydrolysis degree of hen combs treated with BLC as a function of factors: (a) interactions of temperature and hydrolysis period on DH; (b) interactions of temperature and the amount of bacterial concentrate; (c) interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH; (d) contour plots of degree of hen combs hydrolysis as a function of interaction of the amount of bacterial concentrate and hydrolysis period on DH.
Fermentation 08 00056 g002
Figure 3. Dynamics of pH level of hen combs during the hydrolysis period (t): at temperature 30 °C (a) treated with BLC; (b) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 35 °C (c) treated with BLC; (d) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 40 °C (e) treated with BLC; (f) treated with Propionix LCSC. Each trial was performed in five replicates. The bars in the picture represent the standard deviation of each mean.
Figure 3. Dynamics of pH level of hen combs during the hydrolysis period (t): at temperature 30 °C (a) treated with BLC; (b) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 35 °C (c) treated with BLC; (d) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 40 °C (e) treated with BLC; (f) treated with Propionix LCSC. Each trial was performed in five replicates. The bars in the picture represent the standard deviation of each mean.
Fermentation 08 00056 g003
Figure 4. Dynamics of titratable acidity (A) of hen combs during the hydrolysis period (t): at temperature 30 °C (a) treated with BLC; (b) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 35 °C (c) treated with BLC; (d) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 40 °C (e) treated with BLC; (f) treated with Propionix LCSC. Each trial was performed in five replicates. The bars in the picture represent the standard deviation of each mean.
Figure 4. Dynamics of titratable acidity (A) of hen combs during the hydrolysis period (t): at temperature 30 °C (a) treated with BLC; (b) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 35 °C (c) treated with BLC; (d) treated with Propionix LCSC; at temperature 40 °C (e) treated with BLC; (f) treated with Propionix LCSC. Each trial was performed in five replicates. The bars in the picture represent the standard deviation of each mean.
Fermentation 08 00056 g004
Figure 5. The results of the dispersed composition evaluation of comb hydrolysates: (a) control sample in the start time; (b) hydrolyzed control sample; (c) hydrolyzed test sample with Propionix LCSC; (d) hydrolyzed test sample with BLC. MN—average hydrodynamic diameter determined from the numerical particle size distribution in hydrolysates. Results are represented as means (n = 5) ± standard deviation.
Figure 5. The results of the dispersed composition evaluation of comb hydrolysates: (a) control sample in the start time; (b) hydrolyzed control sample; (c) hydrolyzed test sample with Propionix LCSC; (d) hydrolyzed test sample with BLC. MN—average hydrodynamic diameter determined from the numerical particle size distribution in hydrolysates. Results are represented as means (n = 5) ± standard deviation.
Fermentation 08 00056 g005
Figure 6. Microstructure of comb hydrolysates: (1) control sample in the start time; (2) hydrolyzed control sample; (3) hydrolyzed test sample with Propionix LCSC; (4) hydrolyzed test sample with BLC. Staining method: (a) hematoxylin-eosin; (b) according to Van Gieson. Magnification ×800.
Figure 6. Microstructure of comb hydrolysates: (1) control sample in the start time; (2) hydrolyzed control sample; (3) hydrolyzed test sample with Propionix LCSC; (4) hydrolyzed test sample with BLC. Staining method: (a) hematoxylin-eosin; (b) according to Van Gieson. Magnification ×800.
Fermentation 08 00056 g006aFermentation 08 00056 g006b
Table 1. Central composite rotatable design matrix showing coded and actual values of process parameters and their effects on the response variable, degree of hydrolysis (DH).
Table 1. Central composite rotatable design matrix showing coded and actual values of process parameters and their effects on the response variable, degree of hydrolysis (DH).
RunX1X2X3DH of Hen Combs
Propionix LCSCBLC
130 (−1)5 (−1)4 (−1)1.93.9
230 (−1)15 (+1)4 (−1)1.93.3
330 (−1)5 (−1)12 (+1)7.19.1
430 (−1)15 (+1)12 (+1)9.113.1
540 (+1)5 (−1)4 (−1)5.74.0
640 (+1)15 (+1)4 (−1)3.33.9
740 (+1)5 (−1)12 (+1)11.512.3
840 (+1)15 (+1)12 (+1)15.712.4
935 (0)10 (0)8 (0)4.59.1
1035 (0)10 (0)8 (0)4.38.9
1135 (0)10 (0)8 (0)4.89.3
1248.6 (1, 2154)10 (0)8 (0)11.613.0
1323.5 (−1, 2154)10 (0)8 (0)3.43.9
1435 (0)18.2 (1, 2154)8 (0)5.95.9
1535 (0)3.9 (−1, 2154)8 (0)4.55.2
1635 (0)10 (0)14.6 (1, 2154)9.19.1
1735 (0)10 (0)3.1 (−1, 2154)3.23.2
Table 2. Results of statistical analysis of regression coefficients for independent variables (Xj) during hydrolysis of hen combs.
Table 2. Results of statistical analysis of regression coefficients for independent variables (Xj) during hydrolysis of hen combs.
VariablesHydrolyzing by Propionix LCSCHydrolyzing by BLC
Regression Coefficient (b)t-Student’s Criterionp-ValueRegression Coefficient (b)t-Student’s Criterionp-Value
Y-intersection6.56089.607p ≤ 0.0017.427125.009p ≤ 0.001
Variable X11.74419.127p ≤ 0.0010.95112.845p ≤ 0.01
Variable X20.3674.046p ≤ 0.050.2833.829p ≤ 0.05
Variable X32.51827.780p ≤ 0.0012.59835.104p ≤ 0.001
Variable X1·X2−0.013−0.125p ≥ 0.05−0.226−2.617p ≥ 0.05
Variable X1·X30.3873.645p ≤ 0.050.1201.385p ≥ 0.05
Variable X2·X30.5735.405p ≤ 0.050.3203.695p ≤ 0.05
Variable X1·X2·X30.3072.891p ≥ 0.05−0.293−3.387p ≥ 0.05
Variable X120.4333.015p ≥ 0.050.3743.189p ≥ 0.05
Variable X22−0.019−0.138p ≥ 0.05−0.197−1.682p ≥ 0.05
Variable X320.1671.164p ≥ 0.05−0.079−0.674p ≥ 0.05
Table 3. Content of the free amino acids in hen combs.
Table 3. Content of the free amino acids in hen combs.
Amino Acid (AA)Control SampleHydrolyzed Sample
with Propionix LCSC
Hydrolyzed Sample
with BLC
Aspa1.036 ± 0.0093 c2.238 ± 0.0102 a1.242 ± 0.0107 b
Glta3.464 ± 0.0093 b6.53 ± 0.0114 a3.212 ± 0.0086 c
Serinenot detected0.848 ± 0.0124 a0.18 ± 0.0063 b
Histidine3.58 ± 0.0089 c6.282 ± 0.0073 a4.034 ± 0.0108 b
Glycinenot detected2.03 ± 0.0070 a0.09 ± 0.0071 b
Threonine0.81 ± 0.0109 b0.852 ± 0.0097 a0.812 ± 0.0073 b
Arginine2.012 ± 0.0058 c7.35 ± 0.0118 a2.64 ± 0.0927 b
Alanin1.57 ± 0.0084 c3.574 ± 0.0081 a1.946 ± 0.006 b
Tyrosinenot detected1.564 ± 0.006 a1.442 ± 0.0097 b
Cystine3.046 ± 0.0068 b3.018 ± 0.0073 c3.162 ± 0.0073 a
Valine1.342 ± 0.0102 b1.614 ± 0.006 a1.61 ± 0.0055 a
Methionine1.654 ± 0.0087 b1.526 ± 0.0081 c1.774 ± 0.006 a
Phny1.876 ± 0.0112 b1.79 ± 0.0095 c2.142 ± 0.0107 a
Isoleucine1.654 ± 0.0081 c1.774 ± 0.006 b1.902 ± 0.0102 a
Leucine1.682 ± 0.0086 b1.464 ± 0.0087 c2.402 ± 0.0073 a
Proline1.858 ± 0.0058 c2.148 ± 0.0049 b2.904 ± 0.0108 a
Total AA25.45 ± 0.1205 c44.528 ± 0.1270 a31.51 ± 0.0911 b
Results are represented as means (n = 5) ± standard deviation. Means in a row without a common superscript letter differ (p < 0.05) as analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zinina, O.; Merenkova, S.; Rebezov, M.; Zhumanova, G.; Burkov, P.; Knyazeva, A. Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates. Fermentation 2022, 8, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020056

AMA Style

Zinina O, Merenkova S, Rebezov M, Zhumanova G, Burkov P, Knyazeva A. Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates. Fermentation. 2022; 8(2):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zinina, Oksana, Svetlana Merenkova, Maksim Rebezov, Gulnara Zhumanova, Pavel Burkov, and Alexandra Knyazeva. 2022. "Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates" Fermentation 8, no. 2: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020056

APA Style

Zinina, O., Merenkova, S., Rebezov, M., Zhumanova, G., Burkov, P., & Knyazeva, A. (2022). Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates. Fermentation, 8(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop