Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Microbial Hydrolysis of Hen Combs with Bacterial Concentrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Treatment of Printing and Dyeing Wastewater and Performance Prediction Based on Support Vector Regression
Previous Article in Journal
Beneficial Effects of Jujube Juice Fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum NXU19009 on Acute Alcoholic Liver Injury in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics and Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Press Water from Wood Fuel Preparation and Digested Sewage Sludge
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/fermentation8020055
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash

by
Lorenzo Ferrari Assú Tessari
,
Carlos Ricardo Soccol
,
Cristine Rodrigues
,
Estefania García González
,
Valcineide Oliveira de Andrade Tanobe
,
Paulo Cesar de Souza Kirnev
and
Júlio Cesar de Carvalho
*
Department of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil, Centro Politécnico, CP 19011, Curitiba 81531-980, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020055
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 25 January 2022 / Published: 27 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends in Biogenic Gas, Waste and Wastewater Fermentation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the increasing participation of biomass in the world energy matrix, large amounts of ash are produced through combustion, resulting in the need to dispose of this waste to minimize the environmental impact. An alternative is to use ashes as phosphorus supplements in microalgae cultures. The present work describes the development and use of a balanced culture medium based on the minimal processing of oil palm biomass ash to cultivate Arthrospira platensis Paracas, Neochloris oleoabundans UTEX 1185, and Dunaliella salina SAG 184. The acid extraction process of phosphorus (P) was defined by evaluating the following parameters: temperature (20 to 70 °C), acid load (0.01 to 0.03 mols/g of ash) of HNO3, and liquid/solid ratio (50 to 150 mLg−1). The best efficiency of the extraction process was 97%. The use of HNO3 allowed for the production of an extract containing balanced amounts of N and P sources, the BAX medium (Biomass Ash Extract). This medium was efficient for cultivating the three microorganisms studied, reaching biomass concentrations of 2.03, 0.902, and 0.69 g/L or 84%, 82%, and 99% of the control concentrations for A. platensis, N. Oleoabundans, and D. salina, respectively. In a final scaling-up test, A. platensis showed productivity of 0.047 g L−1d−1 in a 120 L tank in a greenhouse. BAX can be an alternative nutrient medium for microalgae cultivation, especially in integration with biomass-fueled biorefineries.

1. Introduction

Bioenergy participation in the world energy matrix has been growing by 8% yearly since 2006 [1]. It is estimated that by 2050, up to 33–50% of the world’s primary energy consumption could be provided by biomass [2,3]. Today, plant biomass used directly as an energy source contributes to 10% of the global energy supply. Part of this use is for cooking and heat, generating a scattered residue. However, much of the biomass is used in industries—16 to 18% in the United States of America, India, and Brazil in 2009 [4]. This industrial use generates large and localized volumes of ash, which must be disposed of. Biomass presents significant advantages mainly because of the reduction of CO2 emissions and reduced dependence on the use of fossil fuels [5].
The increased use of biomass, mainly by the industrial sector, also increases the amount of residual ash generated. Those wishing to apply ash to soil must consider the composition, which is variable and depends on factors such as soil type and composition, crop and cultivation method, season, and combustion temperature [6,7,8,9]. A possible use for biomass ash, rich in inorganic compounds, is its reintegration into the soil as a fertilizer. However, the residue is nutritionally unbalanced—virtually all the nitrogen is volatilized upon burning, and high concentrations of silicon, calcium, and aluminum are often present. Proper pretreatment is essential: although less toxic than coal ash, biomass ash can cause environmental problems [9].
On the other side, microalgal cultures—especially those envisaged for large-scale production of lipids for biodiesel production—demand large amounts of nutrients. Biomass ash can provide part of these nutrients, reducing the dependability on fertilizers that are obtained chiefly from mining, except for nitrogen (fixed via the Haber–Bosch process). The most important macroelements for microalgal cultures, besides carbon (as CO2), are nitrogen (N), sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), magnesium (Mg), and chlorine (Cl) [10,11]. Ash can provide most of these elements but cannot be used directly in liquid culture media because of low nutrient availability (low solubility) and particulate suspended solids’ shading effects, which reduce light penetration and thus microalgae culture growth.
Of the nutrients recoverable from ash biomass, phosphorus is the most important for microalgal cultures. It is a non-renewable resource obtained mainly from mining. Researchers have proposed that the growing demand for this element in agronomy will exceed the global exploration capacity of mineral reserves in 50 to 100 years, a concept called “peak phosphorus” [12]. Little of the extracted P is returned to food and feed [13]. A large amount of P is transferred from mined resources to plants and animals through agriculture and the food chain, and most is lost along with its flow, ending up in agricultural leachates, immobilized in landfills, or is lost in industrial and municipal wastewaters. The phosphate content in worldwide freshwater systems is at least 75% higher than pre-industrial levels, and P flows in the oceans have increased from 8 to 22 million metric tons per year during the same time [14]. Therefore, the extraction of P from the ashes of plant biomass is an alternative to supply it for microalgae cultures, and it increase circularity.
The recovery of phosphates from waste streams is intensively researched, with municipal sludge ashes and biomass ashes representing promising nutrient sources. The recovery typically uses low-cost and efficient sulfuric acid [15,16]. Other acids can be used, such as hydrochloric [17], nitric [18], and even organic acids such as oxalic [19]. Among these acids, the only one that can also be used as a nitrogen source is nitric acid. Phosphates from liquid streams such as digestates from municipal wastewater plants can also be recovered as struvite [20,21,22].
One of the most abundant biomass sources available as fuel, thus generating large quantities of ash, is biomass fractions from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Palm oil is the most important vegetable oil worldwide, with an annual production of around 70 million tons and growing. Its wastes, such as EFB (Empty Fruit Bunch), palm fiber, palm shells, are generated in large amounts, since only 10% of the whole plant is used for oil production [23,24]. Palm processing industries need large amounts of steam, which is generated in boilers fueled by burning residues, preferentially the fibers from the pressing cake [24]. Searching for potential uses for lignocellulosic materials, many authors evaluated the composition of palm processing residues, including ashes. Significant amounts of potassium and phosphorus are found in the biomass ash (Table 1).
Recovered, phosphorus can be used as a mineral nutrient for cultivating microalgae and cyanobacteria, since this is one of the essential elements in the cell composition [34,35]. On-site recovery also gives an alternative to value addition and zero-waste development in biorefineries, including a microalgal cultivation step and producing algal biomass rich in proteins, pigments, and even energetic and dietary lipids. Thus, the study’s objective is to explore the use of nutrients present in minimally processed palm fiber ash to cultivate the cyanobacteria Arthospira platensis and the microalgae Neochloris oleoabundans and Dunaliella salina, with a focus on phosphorus recovery through treatment with nitric acid, thus developing a nitrogen-to-phosphorus balanced culture media based on minimal processing of biomass ash from the palm oil industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Oil Palm Ash

Ash from oil palm was obtained from BioPalma S.A., located in Moju, PA, Northern region of Brazil. Oil palm ash was collected and sieved to remove non-calcined materials, such as fibers. The granulometry distribution (Figure 1) was determined using a 6-screens lab sifter (Bertel VP-01, Lazanjeiras, SP, Brazil). Ashes used for extractions were homogenized lightly in a mortar. To remove the moisture eventually adsorbed, the ash was dried in a laboratory oven (Fanem Orion 502, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil) at 85 °C for 15 h.
The residue was analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (FRX) (Table 2). The equipment used was an Axios Max (Malvern PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands). The results were interpreted using the software SuperQ 5l®, from the same manufacturer.

2.2. Nutrient Extraction from Ash

Ashes were leached to extract phosphate. A 33 experimental design was used, based on conditions described in the literature for of acid extraction of phosphate from diverse ash materials [36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. The independent variables were temperature, mols of acid (as nitric acid), and Liquid/Solid Ratio (L/S). In all experiments, 1 g of ash was mixed with the acid and an adequate amount of Milli-Q water to reach the final intended volume. The levels of the variables are shown in Table 3.
The contact time was defined as 24 h, previously defined as enough time for reaching quasi-equilibrium. After extraction, the mixtures were filtered through nitrocellulose membranes with 0.45 μm pore size to separate the remaining ash from the extract. The extracts were analyzed for the quantification of phosphate.

2.3. Kinetics of Phosphate Extraction

The extraction kinetics of phosphate was evaluated to determine the minimum contact time necessary for extraction. The extraction was performed for 30 h, using the mildest conditions of the initial factorial design (lower temperature and acid concentration, i.e., 20 °C; 0.01 moles of HNO3; L/S 150 mLg−1, periodic stirring). Samples were periodically collected in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was evaluated for phosphate concentration.

2.4. Microorganisms and Culture Media

Three microorganisms suitable for cultivation on a large scale were used as models for studying ash extracts as culture media: the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis strain Paracas and the microalgae Neochloris oleoabundans UTEX 1185 and Dunaliella salina SAG 184.8.
Inoculum and control culture media: The inoculum of Arthrospira platensis was routinely maintained by successive culturing in Zarrouk medium [43], with initial pH 9.5 and at 30 °C. The inoculum of Neochloris oleoabundans was routinely maintained by successive cultures in BG11 medium [44], with initial pH 7.5 and at 25 °C. The inoculum of Dunaliella salina was routinely maintained by successive culturing in Modified Johnson’s Medium (MJM) [45], adjusted to pH 7.1 and at 25 °C. The three cultures were maintained in 3 L Erlenmeyer flasks aerated with 1 vvm of air and irradiation of 25 µmol photons m−2s−1. Control cultures for comparison with extracts had the same compositions and conditions, except for aeration—which was by diffusion, with daily manual homogenization.
BAX (Biomass Ash Extract) media: To evaluate the suitability of oil palm ash extracts as a nutrient source for microalgae growth, the extracts were diluted to match the control media concentration. The conditions for extraction were selected among the experiments that showed the highest phosphate solubilization efficiency in the factorial design. Contact time was 24 h. The supernatant (extract) was filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane with 0.45 μm pore size. The extract was separated into three fractions and diluted to match the theoretical usable concentration of P in each Control medium (Zarrouk, MJM, and BG11), respecting the Redfield ratio of 16 mols of nitrogen for each mol of phosphorus. The pH was adjusted with 10 M NaOH to match the initial pH in control cultures. Additionally, 87.7 g L−1 NaCl was added for Dunaliella salina, specifically to maintain adequate salinity. Culture volume was 500 mL (450 mL culture medium + 50 mL inoculum) in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks, with aeration by diffusion and gentle manual shaking every 24 h. Initial concentrations were 0.09 g L−1 for both A. platensis and N. oleoabundans and 0.13 g L−1 for D. salina. Light intensity was 25 µmol photons m−2s−1, with continuous light, and constant temperature of 25 °C for Neochloris oleoabundans, Dunaliella salina, and 30 °C (±5 °C) for Arthrospira platensis. Each control and treatment were conducted in triplicate.

2.5. Analytical Methods

Phosphate was determined using a colorimetric assay with Malachite Green (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) [46]. All tests were performed using genuine triplicates.
Microalgal biomass was evaluated by daily sampling and evaluating the absorbance at 670 nm (UV1601, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [47,48,49]. Dry mass analyses were performed every 6 days with 50 mL of sample. Samples were filtered through 3 μm (A. platensis and N. oleoabundans) and 1 μm (D. salina) nitrocellulose membranes. The biomass was washed with 10 mL ammonium formate (0.5 mol L−1), dried for 24 h at 80 °C, and weighed [50].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experimental design planning and analysis were performed using the software Statistica® V. 7.0. Significant effects at the level of 5% confidence were considered through analysis of variance (ANOVA). All figures were prepared using MS-Excel® V. 16.0.

3. Results and Discussion

Preliminary tests using raw ash added with nitrogen sources showed poor microalgal growth, presumably because of self-shading caused by insoluble, suspended particulate material and poor nutrient leaching at culture pH. To evaluate the suitability of culturing microalgae using nutrients from ash, we first evaluated and optimized the extraction, then tested extracts as the base for culture media, and finally chose conditions for scaling up.

3.1. Phosphate Extraction

It is well known that lower pH promotes more significant dissolution of P from ashes [36,38,41,51,52]. Typically, strong acids such as H2SO4 and HCl are used to dissolve phosphorus due to their low cost [36,38,41,52,53]. In this investigation, we used nitric acid: it is a strong acid, forms only soluble salts, and it is suitable as a nitrogen source for microalgal cultures, which would have to be added downstream if another acid were used as extractant. The temperature and liquid/solid ratio used were based on the literature, while the amount of acid was calculated based on the amount of phosphate theoretically extractable to give extracts respecting the Redfield ratio [54,55]. Table 4 shows the experimental conditions and results for a 33 experimental design.
The amount of HNO3 chosen was defined according to the foreseen formulation of culture media. Absolute amounts from 0.01 to 0.03 mols acid g−1 ash were estimated to reach the ideal N:P ratio. The acid concentrations ranged from 0.067 to 0.6 mol L−1. This reasoning made it possible to evaluate the L/S ratio without any conflict between variables simultaneously. An 8% efficiency gain in dissolution between 0.01 and 0.02 mol was observed, but a slight increase of 2% from 0.02 to 0.03 mols of HNO3. With the L/S studied (50/1, 100/1, and 150/1), 0.02 and 0.03 mols of HNO3 presented better results. An analysis of the concentration showed that the highest initial acid concentrations did not necessarily give the best dissolution efficiencies: stoichiometry and temperature are more important.
Analyzing temperature, acid addition, and L/S ratio as variables influencing phosphorus extraction, the temperature was the variable that showed the most significant influence on the dissolution, followed by the number of mols, while L/S was not significant at p = 5%. The increase in temperature from 20 to 45 °C promoted an increase of only 2% in the extraction, which may not justify the energy expenditure of a process where average temperatures can be maintained around 20 °C (Figure 2). However, from 20 to 70 °C, there is an increase of 10% in the dissolution efficiency of P. The increase in temperature and acidity increases solubility of phosphorus from palm biomass ash, similarly to what was is described in the literature for sludge and biomass ashes [36,51].
The dissolution of P2O5 varied by 40%. The lowest P dissolution occurred under pH 1.58, while the highest efficiency, 97% (Table 4), was at pH 1.12. Extraction yields near to 100% were reported at pH 1.0 using H2SO4 to treat sewage sludge ash [38], with a far lower recovery (40%) using 0.6M HNO3, however, with an L/S ratio of 5.0, which is 10 to 30 times lower than what was used in this present study. In another study with sewage sludge ash, 0.0075 mol of H2SO4 in 150 mLg−1 and 0.015 mol of HCl in 150 mL g−1 gave satisfactory results, close to 100% phosphate dissolution [36]. A similar result was only obtained in the present study at 70°C with 0.02 mol of HNO3. This difference may have been due to the intermittent agitation: ash sedimentation may have reduced contact with the liquid. The extraction efficiency also likely varies for different materials because of different compositions [41] and acid neutralization by alkali oxides in the ashes.
The L/S ratio showed no significant influence (at P = 5%) on the dissolution of P at the levels tested, presenting a slightly negative variation of 1.8% from 50 to 150 mL g−1. That could be explained not because the volume does not matter, but because all chemical species formed are soluble at the level tested, and that acid-to-ash stoichiometry and the consequent final pH is critical for this dissolution.

3.2. Kinetics of Extraction

The extraction efficiency was plotted against contact time for 30 h to evaluate the dissolution kinetics. The mildest extraction conditions were chosen: 20 °C; 0.01 mols of HNO3; 150 mL g−1. P dissolution is highly dependent on the contact time [36,52] and increases with time as an asymptotic curve (Figure 3). Only 15 min was enough to dissolve 45% of the phosphate, but 8 h were needed to reach the equilibrium concentration (an efficiency of 60%). The relatively fast extraction of phosphorus may be due to its presence as soluble salts in the ashes [56] and the small particle size [41].

3.3. Cultivation of A. platensis, N. oleoabundans, and D. salina on BAX Medium

Both nitrogen and phosphorus must be present in microalgae culture media. Although H2SO4 and HCl are more common for phosphate dissolution, the use of HNO3 as extractant acid allowed the supplementation of adequate amounts of nitrogen to cultivate cyanobacteria and microalgae. In balanced growth conditions, microalgae biomass has an average molar proportion of 106:16:1 (C:N:P) on its composition [34], although deviations exist [55,57]. After the extraction of P, it was examined which conditions have the N:P ratio closest to 16 (Figure 4).
Values above 16 mean nitrogen excess and below 16 mean phosphorus excess. Besides presenting the best extraction of P, Condition 4 presented the best ratio for cultivation: 16.9 is near the Redfield ratio with a slight excess of nitrogen, recovering 97% of the P extracted from oil palm ash.
After adjusting the pH, BAX was diluted 4.3, 34.3, and 30.6 times to match the theoretical usable concentration of P in each control medium (Zarrouk, BG11, and MJM, respectively), respecting the Redfield ratio. (Figure 5) shows the biomass production of A. platensis, N. oleoabundans, and D. salina in the BAX medium.
A. platensis: At the beginning of the cultivation (Figure 5A), both control (Zarrouk medium) and BAX were similar. The cyanobacteria initially had a low growth rate, probably due to the low initial cell concentration, of 0.09 g L−1. After 18 days, BAX cultivation growth started to slow down. The difference between control and BAX at this point is noticeable. On day 31, BAX cultivation reached 82% of the control biomass final concentration. Growth of Arthrospira sp. using POME (palm oil mill effluent) was observed in N:P ratios of 2.7:1 and 2.6:1 [58], while Zarrouk had an N:P ratio of 10:1. It is possible that A. platensis does not need an N:P ratio of 16:1, and the excess of nitrate in the BAX medium may have influenced the growth from day 18, promoting a slight reduction in biomass [59]. However, a hypothesis has been raised that the main reason for better growth in the Zarrouk medium is its initially large concentration of CO2 as sodium bicarbonate.
N. oleoabundans: From day 4 to 8, the BAX culture exhibited a slightly reduced growth compared to the control (BG11 medium), probably due to the process of acclimatizing the cells to the new medium. After day 12, N. oleoabundans elevated the growth rate and finished the 31 days of culture with 0.9 g L−1, while the control had 1 g L−1 (Figure 5B). Kinetics of cyanobacterial and microalgal growth was examined with poultry litter ash and showed better results when the N source was only ammonium [60]. However, the authors reported that 2.5 g L−1 NaNO3 was added to prevent nitrogen limitation, 100 mg L−1 Na2-EDTA was added as a chelating agent, and cultures had aeration of 2 L of air min−1 and luminous intensity of 121.5 µmol photons m−2s−1, far superior than the diffusion aeration and 27 µmol photons m−2S−1 used in the present study.
D. salina: (Figure 5C) shows that this microalga had the best growth in the BAX medium compared to the control (MJM medium). The cultures had similar growth since day 0, reaching final concentrations of 0.69 and 0.70 g L−1, respectively.
For all microorganisms, 27 to 31 days of cultivation, without agitation or forced aeration, was necessary to evaluate the behavior of long-term cultures. All considered, the biomass production and growth rate were comparable in BAX and control media, and to the authors’ best knowledge, there are no published data of oil palm Ash used to grow cyanobacteria and microalgae. The results were satisfactory and proved that phosphorus in the ashes could be used to grow cyanobacteria and microalgae at rates close to or equivalent to widely popular media.

3.4. Scaling Up

The scaleup (120 L, open tank, greenhouse) was carried out to verify growth replicability in large scale, and also two hypotheses: (1) to verify if the aeration would compensate the limitation of the growth of the microalga cultivated in BAX medium when compared with the Zarrouk medium (limitation observed in the laboratory), and (2) because of the ability of Arthorspira to basify the medium to higher values (pH 11), to verify the possibility of reduced growth due to reduced availability of phosphate because of alkaline precipitation as Ca or Mg salts.
In growing on a larger scale (Figure 6), the growth pattern was similar to that observed in the laboratory, but the initial cell concentration was higher (0.22 g L−1). After 25 days of cultivation, the concentration obtained was 1.40 g L−1 and the productivity 0.0472 g L−1d−1, both similar to the laboratory scale culture in the same period. At 31 days of culture, the final cellular concentration observed was 1.6 g L−1, corresponding to 80% of the value obtained in the culture on the laboratory scale. The difference of 20% in the cellular concentration between the scales evaluated can be attributed to natural temperature variability from 22 to 36.7 °C, with an average of 36.7 °C, which may have caused a decrease in culture growth—Arthorspira requires temperatures between 30 and 38 °C for optimal growth [61]. Another critical factor is that the cultivation on an enlarged scale was conditioned to a natural photoperiod of 13 h/11 h, unlike laboratory cultures where irradiation was constant during the 31 days.

3.5. Practical Applications and Future Research

Microalgae are intensively researched as potential food, feed and bioenergy sources. However, one of the drawbacks of large-scale cultures of microalgae is the requirement for nutrients, which increases costs and makes only a few biomass products commercially viable at the moment. The successful cultivation of three important microalgae in ash-extract based culture media (BAX) shows that commercial fertilizers can be substituted as nutrient sources for microalgae, and that the judicious use of nitric acid is adequate to enhance extraction and provide a nitrogen source. BAX could be prepared using other acids, such as sulfuric acid; however, a nitrogen source would have to be added tom complete a culture medium. The use of ash increases the circularity of processes, recovering phosphorus; the high yield shows that a similar process could also be used for recovery of phosphorus for other uses.
The BAX medium is simple to prepare, requiring only pH correction and, for marine microalgae, salt addition. It recycles phosphorus and other mineralized nutrients otherwise lost in biomass ash wastes. However, there are several aspects than can be improved; the three most important are
(i)
Scale-up was similar to laboratory cultures, but with modest productivity. It is possible that warmer temperatures lead to better growth. Repeated batches in a long running experiment will also show if some nutrient lacking, e.g., sodium for Spirulina, or in excess such as iron (usually present in low concentrations in synthetic media) limit the growth or affect the composition.
(ii)
Oil palm ash has a high concentration of potassium, a most needed element in plant fertilizers, but not important enough for microalgae growth. Fractionation of palm ash, e.g., through selective or sequential extraction could make even better use of this residue and maybe integrate it to palm production, reducing the need for fertilizer.
(iii)
Large-scale processing of palm oil ash would require reactors, pumps, and filters. Even if the equipment is simple compared to the large-scale equipment used in palm processing, it involves a capital cost that would have to be compensated by the income from biomass products. This requires a process simulation and sensitivity analysis to indicate if microalgae production, although technically feasible, can be profitable in its biorefinery integration with palm processing.

4. Conclusions

This proof-of-concept study proved that minimally processed palm ash could be used in microalgae production. Because liquid media and nitrate as nitrogen source are required, it is sufficient to treat the ash with nitric acid. Phosphorus dissolution by HNO3 presented satisfactory results at a temperature of 70 °C and an HNO3 concentration of 0.2 M (a mass proportion of 1.26:1 HNO3:ash). In these conditions, up to 97% of the phosphorus was dissolved after 24 h. Lower temperatures (20 °C) are enough to extract about 72% of the phosphate, and 8 h was shown to be enough to reach equilibrium in the mildest conditions. The use of the BAX medium was shown to be efficient for the three microorganisms studied, giving biomass production and productivity similar to control cultures performed in synthetic media, albeit with room for improvement. A scaled-up, 120 L cultivation of A. platensis conducted in a greenhouse confirmed the feasibility of this residue use approach.

Author Contributions

Main experimental investigation, analysis, writing, L.F.A.T.; conceptualization, revision, funding, C.R.S.; writing, analyses, C.R.; writing, revision, E.G.G.; analyses, revision, V.O.d.A.T.; writing, revision, P.C.d.S.K.; conceptualization, project management, revision, J.C.d.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by CNPq, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, grant numbers 407543/2013−0 and 314147/2018−7, and CAPES, the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—PROEX program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Birol, F.; Cozzi, L.; Gould, T.; Bromhead, A.; Priddle, R. World Energy Outlook 2015; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. McKendry, P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vassilev, S.V.; Baxter, D.; Andersen, L.K.; Vassileva, C.G. An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash. Part 1. Phase-mineral and chemical composition and classification. Fuel 2013, 105, 40–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schill, S.R.; IEA Task 40: Biomass Provides 10 Percent of Global Energy Use. Biomass Magazine. Grand Forks 2013. Available online: http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/9444/iea-task40-biomass-provides-10-percent-of-global-energy-use (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  5. Chuah, T.G.; Wan Azlina, A.G.K.; Robiah, Y.; Omar, R. Biomass as the renewable energy sources in Malaysia: An overview. Int. J. Green Energy 2006, 3, 323–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siddique, R. Utilization of wood ash in concrete manufacturing. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 67, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wiselogel, A.E.; Agblevor, F.A.; Johnson, D.K.; Deutch, S.; Fennell, J.A.; Sanderson, M.A. Compositional changes during storage of large round switchgrass bales. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 56, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thy, P.; Jenkins, B.M.; Grundvig, S.; Shiraki, R.; Lesher, C.E. High temperature elemental losses and mineralogical changes in common biomass ashes. Fuel 2006, 85, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmaruzzaman, M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 327–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grobbelaar, J.U. Algal nutrition‒mineral nutrition. In Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 95–115. [Google Scholar]
  11. De Carvalho, J.C.; Sydney, E.B.; Assú Tessari, L.F.; Soccol, C.R. Culture media for mass production of microalgae. In Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals, 2nd ed.; Pandey, A., Chang, J.-S., Soccol, C.R., Lee, D.-J., Chisti, Y.B.T.-B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 33–50. ISBN 978-0-444-64192-2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cordell, D.; Drangert, J.O.; White, S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rittmann, B.E.; Mayer, B.; Westerhoff, P.; Edwards, M. Capturing the lost phosphorus. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bennett, E.M.; Carpenter, S.R.; Caraco, N.F. Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication: A global perspective. Bioscience 2001, 51, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, H.; Hu, G.; Basar, I.A.; Li, J.; Lyczko, N.; Nzihou, A.; Eskicioglu, C. Phosphorus recovery from municipal sludge-derived ash and hydrochar through wet-chemical technology: A review towards sustainable waste management. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 129300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leng, L.; Bogush, A.A.; Roy, A.; Stegemann, J.A. Characterisation of ashes from waste biomass power plants and phosphorus recovery. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 690, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, M.; Kim, D.-J. Identification of phosphorus forms in sewage sludge ash during acid pre-treatment for phosphorus recovery by chemical fractionation and spectroscopy. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 51, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gorazda, K.; Tarko, B.; Wzorek, Z.; Nowak, A.K.; Kulczycka, J.; Henclik, A. Characteristic of wet method of phosphorus recovery from polish sewage sludge ash with nitric acid. Open Chem. 2016, 14, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liang, S.; Chen, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, Z.; Yu, W.; Xiao, K.; Hu, J.; Hou, H.; Liu, B.; Tao, S. A comparison between sulfuric acid and oxalic acid leaching with subsequent purification and precipitation for phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge incineration ash. Water Res. 2019, 159, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Melia, P.M.; Cundy, A.B.; Sohi, S.P.; Hooda, P.S.; Busquets, R. Trends in the recovery of phosphorus in bioavailable forms from wastewater. Chemosphere 2017, 186, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Carey, D.E.; Yang, Y.; McNamara, P.J.; Mayer, B.K. Recovery of agricultural nutrients from biorefineries. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Marchi, A.; Geerts, S.; Saerens, B.; Weemaes, M.; De Clercq, L.; Meers, E. Struvite recovery from domestic wastewater. In Biorefinery of Inorganics: Recovering Mineral Nutrients from Biomass and Organic Waste; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  23. Aziz, M.; Kurniawan, T.; Oda, T.; Kashiwagi, T. Advanced power generation using biomass wastes from palm oil mills. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 114, 1378–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Letti, L.A.J.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Rodrigues, C.; de Carvalho, J.C.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; Karp, S.G.; Torres, L.A.Z.; Guarnizo, A.F.C.; Colonia, B.S.O. Valorization of solid and liquid wastes from palm oil industry. In Waste Biorefinery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 235–265. [Google Scholar]
  25. Madhiyanon, T.; Sathitruangsak, P.; Sungworagarn, S.; Pipatmanomai, S.; Tia, S. A pilot-scale investigation of ash and deposition formation during oil-palm empty-fruit-bunch (EFB) combustion. Fuel Process. Technol. 2012, 96, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lahijani, P.; Zainal, Z.A.; Mohamed, A.R.; Mohammadi, M. Ash of palm empty fruit bunch as a natural catalyst for promoting the CO2 gasification reactivity of biomass char. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 132, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Acquah, C.; Sie Yon, L.; Tuah, Z.; Ling Ngee, N.; Danquah, M.K. Synthesis and performance analysis of oil palm ash (OPA) based adsorbent as a palm oil bleaching material. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamed, A.R.; Lee, K.T.; Noor, N.M.; Zainudin, N.F. Oil palm ash/Ca(OH)2/CaSO4 absorbent for flue gas desulfurization. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 939–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, K.T.; Bhatia, S.; Mohamed, A.R. Preparation and characterization of sorbents prepared from ash (waste material) for sulfur dioxide (SO2) removal. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2005, 7, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hameed, B.H.; Ahmad, A.A.; Aziz, N. Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics of acid dye adsorption on activated palm ash. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 133, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ranjbar, N.; Mehrali, M.; Alengaram, U.J.; Metselaar, H.S.C.; Jumaat, M.Z. Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of fly ash/palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar under elevated temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bashar, I.I.; Alengaram, U.J.; Jumaat, M.Z.; Islam, A.; Santhi, H.; Sharmin, A. Engineering properties and fracture behaviour of high volume palm oil fuel ash based fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zainudin, N.F.; Lee, K.T.; Kamaruddin, A.H.; Bhatia, S.; Mohamed, A.R. Study of adsorbent prepared from oil palm ash (OPA) for flue gas desulfurization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 45, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tyrrell, T. Redfield ratio. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences; Steele, J.H., Thorpe, S.A., Turekian, K.K., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001; Volume 83, pp. 2377–2387. [Google Scholar]
  35. Richmond, A.; Hu, Q. Handbook of Microalgal Culture. Richmond, A., Hu, Q., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 0632059532. [Google Scholar]
  36. Biswas, B.K.; Inoue, K.; Harada, H.; Ohto, K.; Kawakita, H. Leaching of phosphorus from incinerated sewage sludge ash by means of acid extraction followed by adsorption on orange waste gel. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matjie, R.H.; Bunt, J.R.; Van Heerden, J.H.P. Extraction of alumina from coal fly ash generated from a selected low rank bituminous South African coal. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ottosen, L.M.; Kirkelund, G.M.; Jensen, P.E. Extracting phosphorous from incinerated sewage sludge ash rich in iron or aluminum. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parés Viader, R.; Jensen, P.E.; Ottosen, L.M.; Ahrenfeldt, J.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. Electrodialytic extraction of phosphorus from ash of low-temperature gasification of sewage sludge. Electrochimica Acta 2015, 181, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wzorek, Z.; Jodko, M.; Gorazda, K.; Rzepecki, T. Extraction of phosphorus compounds from ashes from thermal processing of sewage sludge. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2006, 19, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, H.; He, P.; Gu, W.; Wang, G.; Shao, L. Recovery of phosphorus as struvite from sewage sludge ash. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 1533–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, Y.; Hu, H.; Liu, J.; Luo, J.; Qian, G.; Wang, A. Ph dependent phosphorus release from waste activated sludge: Contributions of phosphorus speciation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 267, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zarrouk, C. Contribution à l’étude d’une Cyanophycée. Influence de Divers Facteurs Physiques et Chimiques Sur la Croissance et la Photosynthèse de Spirulina maxima. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Paris, Paris, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stanier, R.; Kunisawa, R.; Mandel, M.; Cohen-Bazire, G. BG11 (blue green medium). Cult. Collect. Algae Protozoa 1971, 11, 559001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Borowitzka, M.A.; Borowitzka, L.J. Micro-Algal Biotechnology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; ISBN 0521323495. [Google Scholar]
  46. D’Angelo, E.; Crutchfield, J.; Vandiviere, M. Rapid, sensitive, microscale determination of phosphate in water and soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 2206–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. De Freitas, B.C.B.; Brächer, E.H.; de Morais, E.G.; Atala, D.I.P.; de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Cultivation of different microalgae with pentose as carbon source and the effects on the carbohydrate content. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 1062–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Silva, H.R.; Prete, C.E.C.; Zambrano, F.; de Mello, V.H.; Tischer, C.A.; Andrade, D.S. Combining glucose and sodium acetate improves the growth of Neochloris oleoabundans under mixotrophic conditions. AMB Express 2016, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Walter, A.; De Carvalho, J.C.; Soccol, V.T.; De Faria, A.B.B.; Ghiggi, V.; Soccol, C.R. Study of phycocyanin production from Spirulina platensis under different light spectra. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2011, 54, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, C.J.; Lee, Y.K. Determination of biomass dry weight of marine microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 1997, 9, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tan, Z.; Lagerkvist, A. Phosphorus recovery from the biomass ash: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3588–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cohen, Y. Phosphorus dissolution from ash of incinerated sewage sludge and animal carcasses using sulphuric acid. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Egle, L.; Rechberger, H.; Zessner, M. Overview and description of technologies for recovering phosphorus from municipal wastewater. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 105, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Redfield, A.C. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am. Sci. 1958, 46, 205–221. [Google Scholar]
  55. Geider, R.J.; La Roche, J. Redfield revisited: Variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol. 2002, 37, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hong, K.-J.; Tarutani, N.; Shinya, Y.; Kajiuchi, T. Study on the recovery of phosphorus from waste-activated sludge incinerator ash. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2005, 40, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hedges, J.I.; Baldock, J.A.; Gélinas, Y.; Lee, C.; Peterson, M.L.; Wakeham, S.G. The biochemical and elemental compositions of marine plankton: A NMR perspective. Mar. Chem. 2002, 78, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Azimatun Nur, M.M. Evaluation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ratio of palm oil mill effluent digested (POMED) wastewater as replacement synthetic medium for Spirulina sp. growth. Am. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2014, 14, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jeanfils, J.; Canisius, M.F.; Burlion, N. Effect of high nitrate concentrations on growth and nitrate uptake by free-living and immobilized Chlorella vulgaris cells. J. Appl. Phycol. 1993, 5, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Markou, G.; Iconomou, D.; Sotiroudis, T.; Israilides, C.; Muylaert, K. Exploration of using stripped ammonia and ash from poultry litter for the cultivation of the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis and the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 196, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Colla, L.M.; Furlong, E.B.; Alberto, J.; Costa, V. Antioxidant properties of Spirulina (Arthospira) platensis cultivated under different temperatures and nitrogen regimes. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2007, 50, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Fermentation 08 00055 g001 550
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of oil palm ash.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of oil palm ash.
Fermentation 08 00055 g001
Fermentation 08 00055 g002 550
Figure 2. Phosphate dissolution is favored by higher temperatures (A) and higher acid content (B), but is not significantly affected by concentration (liquid to solids ratio, (C) in the range evaluated. The dispersion of each group of points shows the effect of the two complementary variables, e.g., temperature and HNO3: Ash in Figure 2C.
Figure 2. Phosphate dissolution is favored by higher temperatures (A) and higher acid content (B), but is not significantly affected by concentration (liquid to solids ratio, (C) in the range evaluated. The dispersion of each group of points shows the effect of the two complementary variables, e.g., temperature and HNO3: Ash in Figure 2C.
Fermentation 08 00055 g002
Fermentation 08 00055 g003 550
Figure 3. Kinetics of P dissolution.
Figure 3. Kinetics of P dissolution.
Fermentation 08 00055 g003
Fermentation 08 00055 g004 550
Figure 4. N:P ratio of the palm oil ash extracts.
Figure 4. N:P ratio of the palm oil ash extracts.
Fermentation 08 00055 g004
Fermentation 08 00055 g005 550
Figure 5. Biomass production of Arthrospira platensis (A), Neochloris oleoabundans (B) and Dunaliella salina (C) on control (synthetic) and BAX medium. All results are average of triplicates.
Figure 5. Biomass production of Arthrospira platensis (A), Neochloris oleoabundans (B) and Dunaliella salina (C) on control (synthetic) and BAX medium. All results are average of triplicates.
Fermentation 08 00055 g005
Fermentation 08 00055 g006 550
Figure 6. Growth kinetics of scaled-up A. platensis cultivation conducted in a greenhouse with a BAX medium.
Figure 6. Growth kinetics of scaled-up A. platensis cultivation conducted in a greenhouse with a BAX medium.
Fermentation 08 00055 g006
Table
Table 1. Mineral Composition of oil palm biomasses and ash fractions.
Table 1. Mineral Composition of oil palm biomasses and ash fractions.
[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]
ComponentsEFBEFBPSOPAOPAOPAAPAPOFAPOFAPOFA
SiO212.1227.0049.7086.4435.6037.0040.0064.1767.7240.00
CaO9.658.0010.20-12.009.2010.005.805.5710.00
K2O55.4844.0012.20-11.0011.0012.108.257.6712.10
Al2O30.26-7.706.494.8014.306.103.733.716.10
MgO1.904.806.901.517.206.106.404.874.046.40
P2O53.583.608.40-6.806.208.325.18-8.20
Fe2O3-3.002.704.082.002.50-6.334.712.50
SO31.662.70-0.20---0.721.07-
Na2O0.09--0.10-0.10-0.180.16-
Cl6.845.30---2.90----
C---------5.40
TiO2-------0.19--
MnO-------0.18--
MnO2---0.10------
ZnO-------0.03--
Rb2O-------0.06--
Cr2O3---0.69---0.03--
Rh2O3---0.41------
CuO-------0.08--
RuO2---0.29------
SrO-------0.02--
ZrO2-------< 0.01--
NiO-------0.02--
Y2O3-------< 0.01--
Note: EFB: empty fruit bunch; PS: palm shell; OPA: oil palm ash; APA: activated palm ash; POFA: palm oil fuel ash.
Table
Table 2. Composition of OPA.
Table 2. Composition of OPA.
Componentswt% of Dry Solids
SiO249.40
K2O11.60
CaO8.70
P2O58.60
MgO5.80
Fe2O35.60
Al2O31.60
SO31.60
Cl0.70
TiO20.20
MnO0.10
SrO0.10
Na2O0.10
ZrO2<0.10
CuO<0.10
ZnO<0.10
LOI.5.99
Note: LOI.: lost on ignition. Results normalized for 100%.
Table
Table 3. Conditions of the variables in the experiment.
Table 3. Conditions of the variables in the experiment.
Temperature (°C)Moles of AcidL/S (mL g−1)
200.0150
450.02100
700.03150
Table
Table 4. 33 experimental design for phosphate extraction.
Table 4. 33 experimental design for phosphate extraction.
SampleExperiment ConditionsRecovered P2O5 (g)Dissolution of P2O5 (%)
Temperature (°C)Acid Added, MolsLiquid/Solid Ratio (mL g−1)
1700.01500.06778.39
2700.011000.06575.31
3700.011500.05867.31
4700.021500.08497.52
5700.031500.07385.21
6700.031000.06979.94
7700.03500.07283.91
8700.02500.07385.18
9700.021000.07688.59
10450.01500.05968.76
11450.011000.06474.86
12450.011500.05766.64
13450.021500.06069.33
14450.031500.06576.04
15450.031000.07081.43
16450.03500.06979.88
17450.02500.06069.96
18450.021000.06575.46
19450.021000.06676.65
20450.021000.06575.31
21200.01500.06272.42
22200.011000.05968.90
23200.011500.04957.02
24200.021500.06373.35
25200.031500.06474.25
26200.031000.07486.50
27200.03500.06272.12
28200.02500.06272.27
29200.021000.06372.92
Note: Samples 18, 19, and 20 represent triplicates of the central point in the factorial experiment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tessari, L.F.A.; Soccol, C.R.; Rodrigues, C.; González, E.G.; Tanobe, V.O.d.A.; Kirnev, P.C.d.S.; de Carvalho, J.C. Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash. Fermentation 2022, 8, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020055

AMA Style

Tessari LFA, Soccol CR, Rodrigues C, González EG, Tanobe VOdA, Kirnev PCdS, de Carvalho JC. Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash. Fermentation. 2022; 8(2):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tessari, Lorenzo Ferrari Assú, Carlos Ricardo Soccol, Cristine Rodrigues, Estefania García González, Valcineide Oliveira de Andrade Tanobe, Paulo Cesar de Souza Kirnev, and Júlio Cesar de Carvalho. 2022. "Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash" Fermentation 8, no. 2: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020055

APA Style

Tessari, L. F. A., Soccol, C. R., Rodrigues, C., González, E. G., Tanobe, V. O. d. A., Kirnev, P. C. d. S., & de Carvalho, J. C. (2022). Development of a Culture Medium for Microalgae Production Based on Minimal Processing of Oil Palm Biomass Ash. Fermentation, 8(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop