Next Article in Journal
Effect of Fermentation Strategy on the Quality and Aroma Characteristics of Yellow Peach Wines
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant and Functional Features of Pre-Fermented Ingredients Obtained by the Fermentation of Milling By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
Thorough Investigation of the Effects of Cultivation Factors on Polyhydroalkanoates (PHAs) Production by Cupriavidus necator from Food Waste-Derived Volatile Fatty Acids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulatory Effect of Limosilactobacillus fermentum grx08 on the Anti-Oxidative Stress Capacity of Liver, Heart, and Kidney in High-Fat Diet Rats
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Determination of Changes in Volatile Aroma Components, Antioxidant Activity and Bioactive Compounds in the Production Process of Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) Vinegar Produced by Traditional Methods

Fermentation 2022, 8(11), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110606
by Havva Nilgün Budak
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Fermentation 2022, 8(11), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110606
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 1 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

You wrote, Vinegar was produced in three replications, and the analyses were performed in two replications. Please clarify how many times the whole experiment has been repeated, and how many times each sample has been analysed. I think you may wrote that you estimated antioxidant activity using Folin assay and ABTS assay.

Author Response

Reviewer 1 respond:

1. Line 92-93: The sentence were changed as “The jujube vinegar production was repeated in two parallel and three replications. All analyzes were carried out in two parallels”.

2. The total phenolic contents (TPC) of the samples were determined in mg GAE/L using the Folin-Ciocalteau method. In addition, the antioxidant activity values of the samples were expressed as mmol TE/L using the 2,2'-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS-TEAC) method.

3. Thank you for your contribution.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors compared the organic acids, phenolic compounds, and volatile compositions in jujube juice, wine and vinegar in detail. There are the following problems for the authors to consider:

 

1.      There is no production flow chart of jujube wine.

2.      Table 3 is too closely arranged to be identified clearly. Figure 2 and 3 are too small to identify the legends.

3.      Important experimental phenomena, for example, the content of ascorbic acid increased dramatically in the wine, should be explained.

4.  Sugar content and flavor are important indexes for juice, wine and vinegar. I suggest the author to append the related data.

Author Response

Reviewer comments were evaluated and the article was revised. A respond letter to the reviewer is attached. Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This work gives an detailed investigation on the profiles of phenolic compounds, organic acid, volatile compounds, and antioxidant capacity of jujube juice, wine, and vinegar. The following points to improve the manuscript.

1)     Abstract: more detailed results as well as some essential data should be included.

2)     Line 13-16: what is the idea of this sentence?

3)     In Figure 1, the JW should be jujube wine.

4)     Methods: the process for producing jujube juice, wine, and vinegar should be described in detail.

5)     Was the crushed jujube and water rested for 1 week to obtain the jujube juice without any treatment? Why?

6)     As shown in Figure 1, the jujube juice was adjusted to 12 Bx by adding saccharose. In this sense, it cannot be compared with the literature as listed in Line 158-160.

7)     Line 166: where is the result of total soluble dry matter?

8)     As shown in Table 3, there was a high level of lactic acid in the jujube juice sample. Where did it come from? As is well known, little lactic acid can be detected in unfermented juice.

9)     The most active aroma compounds should be determined by the odor active value (OAV), but not the ratio.

10) Numerous grammatical mistakes and confused sentences existed in the manuscript. Please check them and revised carefully.

Author Response

Reviewer comments were evaluated and the article was revised. A respond letter to the reviewer is attached. Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have revised the manuscript according to the comments. However, there are still some questions in the revised manuscript.

1)     In Figure 1, the ' jujube vinegar (JW)' was not corrected.

2)     As the jujube fruit is not so juicy, the jujube juice is usually obtained by extracting with water. However, the extracting process in this research was too long, which might cause microbial spoilage due to the growth of bacteria, yeast, and mould. I am curious how to prevent this change when the crushed jujube and water were rested for 1 week without any treatment. The high amount of lactic acid in jujube juice might be the result of fermentation by lactic acid bacteria during the extracting process. Maybe, this research followed a traditional production technique, but it was not an ideal and controllable way. Therefore, some introduction and discussion about the traditional process and the possible effects are necessary to clarify the abovementioned question.

3)     Some 'jujuba' in the text (such as line 106) should be replaced with 'jujube'. Please check them out.

Author Response

 2nd round questions of the 3rd reviewer have been answered. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 3 Report

A minor point:

Line 96: should '10 C' be '10 °C'?

Author Response

Author Respond to Reviewer 3 Comment :

Line 96: It was corrected “10 C” as“10 °C”.

Back to TopTop