Previous Article in Journal
Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Blend of Essential Oils (Blend of Eugenol, Linalool, Anethole, and Cinnamaldehyde) Increases Ruminal Propionate and Improves Total Tract Starch Digestibility in Steers Fed a Dry-Rolled Corn-Based Finishing Diet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Host–Rumen Microbiome Interactions in Ruminants: Linking Microbial Fermentation, Productivity, Methane Mitigation, and Sustainable Performance

by
Ahmed E. Kholif
1,2,* and
Abdelkader M. Kholif
2
1
Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
2
Dairy Science Department, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St. Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2026, 12(9), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090434 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 August 2026 / Revised: 8 September 2026 / Accepted: 10 September 2026 / Published: 12 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ruminal Fermentation, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

The rumen is a complex microbial ecosystem in which anaerobic fermentation determines the availability of energy and protein to ruminant hosts and influences feed efficiency, animal productivity, and environmental emissions. This review integrates current knowledge of host–rumen microbiome interactions with particular emphasis on microbial fermentation, nutrient utilization, feed efficiency, methane (CH4) production, and sustainable ruminant production. We examine how dietary factors, including forage-to-concentrate ratio, carbohydrate fermentability, protein degradability, and lipid supplementation, alter microbial community structure, hydrogen metabolism, volatile fatty acid production, microbial protein synthesis, and nitrogen utilization. The review further evaluates microbiome-targeted strategies, including 3-nitrooxypropanol, red seaweeds (Asparagopsis spp.), nitrate, direct-fed microbials, and plant-derived bioactive compounds, with emphasis on their effects on fermentation pathways and methanogenesis; these strategies differ substantially in evidence base and mechanistic specificity, with 3-nitrooxypropanol supported by the most consistent mechanistic and in vivo evidence and several plant-derived compounds and direct-fed microbials showing more variable responses. Evidence from microbiome-wide and genome-wide association studies indicates that host genetics contributes to variation in rumen microbial composition and function, with potential consequences for feed efficiency and CH4 emissions. Host-side determinants of the rumen environment, such as feed intake, digesta passage rate, saliva production, and epithelial and immune function, further shape microbial responses. However, responses to microbiome-targeted interventions remain variable because of microbial functional redundancy, dietary context, adaptation, and host-specific effects. We therefore discuss the major constraints limiting the consistent translation of microbiome research into practical feeding strategies and propose an integrated framework combining functional microbiome indicators, precision nutrition, host–microbiome-informed selection, and real-time monitoring. Understanding and manipulating rumen microbial fermentation through coordinated nutritional and host-based approaches may provide a pathway toward improving ruminant productivity while reducing the environmental footprint of livestock production. Among the strategies reviewed, 3-nitrooxypropanol currently has the strongest and most reproducible evidence base, whereas plant-derived bioactives and several direct-fed microbials remain promising but inconsistent, and validated on-farm microbiome biomarkers remain a major gap.
Keywords: rumen microbiome; microbial fermentation; host–microbiome interactions; feed efficiency; methane mitigation; ruminant nutrition; microbial ecology; precision nutrition rumen microbiome; microbial fermentation; host–microbiome interactions; feed efficiency; methane mitigation; ruminant nutrition; microbial ecology; precision nutrition

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kholif, A.E.; Kholif, A.M. Host–Rumen Microbiome Interactions in Ruminants: Linking Microbial Fermentation, Productivity, Methane Mitigation, and Sustainable Performance. Fermentation 2026, 12, 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090434

AMA Style

Kholif AE, Kholif AM. Host–Rumen Microbiome Interactions in Ruminants: Linking Microbial Fermentation, Productivity, Methane Mitigation, and Sustainable Performance. Fermentation. 2026; 12(9):434. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kholif, Ahmed E., and Abdelkader M. Kholif. 2026. "Host–Rumen Microbiome Interactions in Ruminants: Linking Microbial Fermentation, Productivity, Methane Mitigation, and Sustainable Performance" Fermentation 12, no. 9: 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090434

APA Style

Kholif, A. E., & Kholif, A. M. (2026). Host–Rumen Microbiome Interactions in Ruminants: Linking Microbial Fermentation, Productivity, Methane Mitigation, and Sustainable Performance. Fermentation, 12(9), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop