Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microbial Strains and Cultivation Conditions
2.2. Phytopathogenic Fungi Cultivation and Antifungal Activity of Cell-Free Supernatant
2.3. Antifungal Activity on Detached Leaves
2.4. Extraction of Secondary Metabolites from Bacillus velezensis 5RB
2.5. Identification of Metabolites Produced by B. velezensis 5RB Using Mass Spectrometric Studies
2.6. Lipopeptide Fractions Isolated by RP-HPLC from Cell-Free Supernatant of B. velezensis 5RB
3. Results
3.1. Antifungal Activity of Bacillus velezensis 5RB in Selected Production Media
3.2. Characterization of Metabolite Components Produced by B. velezensis 5RB by Mass Spectrometry
3.2.1. LC-MS Profiling of Secondary Metabolites from B. velezensis 5RB
3.2.2. Structural Diversity and Profiling of the Fengycin Class
3.2.3. Structural Diversity and Profiling of Lipopeptides Belonging to the Surfactin Family
3.2.4. Identification of Linear Forms of Fengycin and Surfactin Produced by B. velezensis 5RB
3.2.5. Polyketides Identified in Free-Cell Extracts of c 5RB
3.2.6. Identification of Ribosomally Synthesized Sactipeptide Subtilosin A
3.3. Genome Mining of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in B. velezensis 5RB
3.4. Comparative Distribution of Antimicrobial Metabolites in the Selected Production Media
3.5. Antifungal Activity Against B. cinerea of Lipopeptide Fractions Isolated by RP-HPLC from Cell-Free Supernatant of B. velezensis 5RB
3.6. Ex Vivo Biocontrol Activity of the Fermentation Broth of Bacillus velezensis 5RB Against Botrytis cinerea and Phytophthora infestans
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Maharachchikumbura, S.S.; Mahadevakumar, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Al-Sadi, A.M.; Chalasani, D.; Chandranayaka, S.; Dissanayake, L.S.; Faraj, T.K.; Fernando, W.G.D.; Gunasinghe, N.; et al. The 50 most researched fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. Fungal Divers. 2026, 136, 136004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Madhushan, A.; Weerasingha, D.B.; Ilyukhin, E.; Taylor, P.W.J.; Ratnayake, A.S.; Liu, J.-K.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. From Natural Hosts to Agricultural Threats: The Evolutionary Journey of Phytopathogenic Fungi. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.; Zheng, W.; Mu, Y.; Feng, T.; Hao, Y.; Song, W.; Cai, J.; Zhan, B.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, B. Biological control of a novel strain Bacillus velezensis BFWR11 against tomato early blight. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2026, 119, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ivanov, A.A.; Ukladov, E.O.; Golubeva, T.S. Phytophthora infestans: An Overview of Methods and Attempts to Combat Late Blight. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Borriss, R.; Gao, X.; Fan, B. Bacillus velezensis as a model for plant-associated beneficial bacilli. J. Bacteriol. 2026, 208, e00519-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Akintayo, S.O.; Hosseini, B.; Vahidinasab, M.; Messmer, M.; Pfannstiel, J.; Bertsche, U.; Hubel, P.; Henkel, M.; Hausmann, R.; Voegele, R.T.; et al. Characterization of antifungal properties of lipopeptide-producing Bacillus velezensis strains and their proteome-based response to the phytopathogens, Diaporthe spp. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1228386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Armenova, N.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Arsov, A.; Stefanov, S.; Petrov, K.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Petrova, P. Antifungal Biocontrol in Sustainable Crop Protection: Microbial Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Plant-Derived Agents. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yan, Y.; Xu, W.; Hu, Y.; Tian, R.; Wang, Z. Bacillus velezensis YYC promotes tomato growth and induces resistance against bacterial wilt. Biol. Control 2022, 172, 104977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, W.; Sun, L.; Wu, H.; Gu, W.; Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Zhou, C.; Geng, H.; et al. Bacillus velezensis YXDHD1-7 Prevents Early Blight Disease by Promoting Growth and Enhancing Defense Enzyme Activities in Tomato Plants. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Feng, B.; Li, P.; Chen, D.; Ding, C. Inhibition activity of tomato endophyte Bacillus velezensis FQ-G3 against postharvest Botrytis cinerea. Folia Microbiol. 2024, 69, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhuang, W.; Zeng, Z. Bacillus velezensis BV01 Has Broad-Spectrum Biocontrol Potential and the Ability to Promote Plant Growth. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gao, Z.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Han, J.; Zhang, Y. Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Biol. Control 2017, 105, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Armenova, N.; Petrova, P.; Gerginova, M.; Krumova, E.; Kaynarov, D.; Velkova, L.; Dolashka, P.; Petrov, K. Bacillus velezensis R22 Inhibits the Growth of Multiple Fungal Phytopathogens by Producing Surfactin and Four Fengycin Homologues. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2024, 38, 2313072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Markelova, N.; Chumak, A. Antimicrobial Activity of Bacillus Cyclic Lipopeptides and Their Role in the Host Adaptive Response to Changes in Environmental Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kulimushi, P.Z.; Arias, A.A.; Franzil, L.; Steels, S.; Ongena, M. Stimulation of fengycin-type antifungal lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in the presence of Rhizomucor variabilis. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Kuipers, O.P. Identification and classification of antimicrobial compounds produced by Bacillales species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rangarajan, V.; Clarke, K.G. Process development and intensification for enhanced production of Bacillus lipopeptides. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2015, 31, 46–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Beltran-Gracia, E.; Macedo-Raygoza, G.; Villafaña-Rojas, J.; Martinez-Rodriguez, A.; Chavez-Castrillon, Y.Y.; Espinosa-Escalante, F.M.; Di Mascio, P.; Ogura, T.; Beltran-Garcia, M.J. Production of Lipopeptides by Fermentation Processes: Endophytic Bacteria, Fermentation Strategies and Easy Methods for Bacterial Selection. In Fermentation Processes; Jozala, A.F., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 260–271. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/51664 (accessed on 8 February 2017).
- Zhou, D.; Hu, F.; Lin, J.; Wang, W.; Li, S. Genome and Transcriptome Analysis of Bacillus velezensis BS-37 in Response to D-/L-Leucine. MicrobiologyOpen 2019, 8, e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pathak, K.V.; Keharia, H.; Gupta, K.; Thakur, S.S.; Balaram, P. Lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis K1: Characterization of a Library of Fengycins. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 23, 1716–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.C.; Leveau, J.; Gardener, B.B.M.; Pierson, E.A.; Pierson, L.S., III; Ryu, C.M. The Multifactorial Basis for Plant Health Promotion by Plant-Associated Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1548–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Yu, H.; Shen, Z. Identification of Lipopeptide Isoforms by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 2529–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rabbee, M.F.; Ali, M.S.; Choi, J.; Hwang, B.S.; Jeong, S.C.; Baek, K.-H. Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes. Molecules 2019, 24, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Butcher, R.A.; Schroeder, F.C.; Fischbach, M.A.; Straight, P.D.; Kolter, R.; Walsh, C.T.; Clardy, J. The Identification of Bacillaene, the Product of the Bacillus subtilis pksX Megacomplex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1506–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.H.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Schneider, K.; Vater, J.; Süssmuth, R.; Piel, J.; Borriss, R. Comparative Analysis of the Complete Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Schneider, K.; Chen, X.-H.; Vater, J.; Franke, P.; Nicholson, G.; Borriss, R.; Süssmuth, R.D. Macrolactin Is the Polyketide Biosynthesis Product of the pks2 Cluster of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Caulier, S.; Nannan, C.; Gillis, A.; Licciardi, F.; Bragard, C.; Mahillon, J. Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Petrova, P.; Velikova, P.; Petrov, K. Genome Sequence of Bacillus velezensis 5RB, an Overproducer of 2,3-Butanediol. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e01475-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Armenova, N.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Petrova, P.; Gerginova, M.; Krumova, E.; Arsov, A.; Velkova, L.; Dolashka, P.; Petrov, K. Enhanced Antifungal Activity of Bacillus velezensis R22 Against Botrytis cinerea Through Medium and Process Optimization. Fermentation 2026, 12, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barale, S.S.; Ghane, S.G.; Sonawane, K.D. Purification and characterization of antibacterial surfactin isoforms produced by Bacillus velezensis SK. AMB Express 2022, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Zhao, D.; Qi, G.; Mao, Z.; Hu, X.; Du, B.; Liu, K.; Ding, Y. Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for promoting plant growth and inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ley-López, N.; Heredia, J.B.; Martín-Hernández, C.S.; Cruz-Lachica, I.; Márquez-Zequera, I.; Medina-López, R.; García-Estrada, R.S. Identification and Quantification of Lipopeptide Homologues Induced and Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Fermentation 2023, 9, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- McCann, A.; Kune, C.; La Rocca, R.; Oetjen, J.; Arias, A.A.; Ongena, M.; Far, J.; Eppe, G.; Quinton, L.; De Pauw, E. Rapid visualization of lipopeptides and potential bioactive groups of compounds by combining ion mobility and MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2021, 39, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ma, Y.; Kong, Q.; Qin, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lv, R.; Zhou, G. Identification of lipopeptides in Bacillus megaterium by two-step ultrafiltration and LC-ESI-MS/MS. AMB Express 2016, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vater, J.; Kablitz, B.; Wilde, C.; Franke, P.; Mehta, N.; Cameotra, S.S. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization--time of flight mass spectrometry of lipopeptide biosurfactants in whole cells and culture filtrates of Bacillus subtilis C-1 isolated from petroleum sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6210–6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Grifé-Ruiz, M.; Hierrezuelo-León, J.; de Vicente, A.; Pérez-García, A.; Romero, D. Diversification of Lipopeptide Analogues Drives Versatility in Biological Activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yousfi, S.; Krier, F.; Deracinois, B.; Steels, S.; Coutte, F.; Frikha-Gargouri, O. Characterization of Bacillus velezensis 32a metabolites and their synergistic bioactivity against crown gall disease. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 280, 127569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Marx, R.; Stein, T.; Entian, K.-D.; Glaser, S.J. Structure of the Bacillus subtilis peptide antibiotic subtilosin a determined by H-1-NMR and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Protein Chem. 2001, 20, 20501–20506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, T.; Geng, H.; Miyyapuram, V.R.; Sit, C.S.; Vederas, J.C.; Nakano, M.M. Isolation of a variant of subtilosin A with hemolytic activity. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 5690–5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ayaz, M.; Li, C.-H.; Ali, Q.; Zhao, W.; Chi, Y.-K.; Shafiq, M.; Ali, F.; Yu, X.-Y.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, J.-T.; et al. Bacterial and Fungal Biocontrol Agents for Plant Disease Protection: Journey from Lab to Field, Current Status, Challenges, and Global Perspectives. Molecules 2023, 28, 6735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mubeen, S.; Rafique, M.; Munis, M.F.H.; Javed, H. ChaudharyStudy of southern corn leaf blight (SCLB) on maize genotypes and its effect on yield. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2017, 16, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tomar, P.; Thakur, N.; Jhamta, S.; Kapoor, M.; Singh, S.; Shreaz, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Rustagi, S.; Rai, P.K.; Rai, A.K. Bacterial biopesticides: Biodiversity, role in pest management and beneficial impact. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Miloudi-Agha, L.; Kebdani, M. Mechanisms Underpinning the Biocontrol Potential of Halophilic and Halotolerant Bacillus Species Against Fusarium and Other Fungal Phytopathogens: An Eco-Friendly Alternative for Sustainable Agriculture. Bacteria 2026, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, S.Y.; Herrera-Balandrano, D.D.; Wang, Y.X.; Shi, X.C.; Chen, X.; Jin, Y.; Liu, F.-Q.; Laborda, P. Biocontrol ability of the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens group for management of fungal postharvest diseases: Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6591–6616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Xiao, P.; Tian, X.; Zhu, P.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, C. The Use of Surfactin in Inhibiting Botrytis Cinerea and in Protecting Winter Jujube from the Gray Mold. AMB Express 2023, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, F.; Huo, K.; Song, X.; Quan, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, W.; Yang, C. Engineering of a Genome-Reduced Strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for Enhancing Surfactin Production. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Baptista, J.P.; Teixeira, G.M.; de Jesus, M.L.A.; Bertê, R.; Higashi, A.; Mosela, M.; da Silva, D.V.; de Oliveira, J.P.; Sanches, D.S.; Brancher, J.D.; et al. Antifungal activity and genomic characterization of the biocontrol agent Bacillus velezensis CMRP 4489. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pandey, C.; Prabha, D.; Negi, Y.K.; Maheshwari, D.K.; Dheeman, S.; Gupta, M. Macrolactin A mediated biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani infestation on Amaranthus hypochondriacus by Bacillus subtilis BS-58. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1105849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ding, Z.; Fu, W.; Zhou, P.; Gao, T.; Zheng, Z. Wheat-associated Antagonistic Bacteria Exerts Biocontrol Activity Against Fungal Growth and Deoxynivalenol Production in Fusarium Graminearum. Curr. Microbiol. 2026, 83, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Balthazar, C.; Novinscak, A.; Cantin, G.; Joly, D.L.; Filion, M. Biocontrol Activity of Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Against Botrytis cinerea and Other Cannabis Fungal Pathogens. Phytopathol. 2022, 112, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Hou, Y.; Xia, X.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, A.; Feng, S.; Li, P.; Shi, L.; Dong, P. Isolation and Screening of Antagonistic Endophytes against Phytophthora infestans and Preliminary Exploration on Anti-oomycete Mechanism of Bacillus velezensis 6-5. Plants 2023, 12, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wockenfuss, A.; Chan, K.; Cooper, J.G.; Chaya, T.; Mauriello, M.A.; Yannarell, S.M.; Maresca, J.A.; Donofrio, N.M. A Bacillus velezensis Strain Shows Antimicrobial Activity against Soilborne and Foliar Fungi and Oomycetes. Front. Fungal Biol. 2024, 5, 1332755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Wan, S.; Yan, Z.; Qin, Z.; Gao, H. Identification and Characterization of the Antifungal Proteins from Bacillus velezensis KL-2 to Target Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- El Arbi, A.; Arnauld, S.; Chataigné, G.; Lecouturier, D.; Bricout, A.; Gharsallah, N.; Jacques, P.; Siah, A.; Rochex, A. Lipopeptide Culture Filtrates from Bacillus spp. provide effective protection to wheat against the foliar pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 135, lxad306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yuan, H.; Wang, L.; Hou, H.; Qin, G.; Shi, B.; Zhou, B.; Chen, Y.; Tu, H. Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Bacillus velezensis Strain P2-1 against Botryosphaeria dothidea-Induced Postharvest Decay in Apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2025, 222, 113405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ito, K.; Tomita, S.; Fujimaki, T.; Matsutani, M.; Enomoto, G.; Kajikawa, A.; Asai, K.; Yokota, K. Characterization of the Antifungal Activity of the Bacterial Isolate Bacillus velezensis TCG15. Arch. Microbiol. 2025, 207, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vibha, R.; Granada, D.L.; Skariyachan, S.; Ujwal, P.; Sandesh, K. In vitro and In silico investigation deciphering novel antifungal activity of endophyte Bacillus velezensis CBMB205 against Fusarium oxysporum. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wita, A.; Białas, W.; Czaczyk, K.; Drożdżyńska, A.; Sobiech, Ł.; Grzanka, M.; Danielewicz, J.; Jajor, E.; Horoszkiewicz, J.; Marecik, R. Biocontrol of Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet by a novel Bacillus velezensis KT27 strain: Enhanced antifungal activity and growth promotion in laboratory and field conditions. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0323889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Peng, R.; Zhou, A.; Chen, J.; Wen, M.; Wang, F.; Wu, J. Antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis HY13 against anthracnose disease of Buxus bodinieri caused by Colletotrichum fructicola. Biol. Control 2025, 208, 105845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- 54Elhjouji, H.; Qessaoui, R.; Houmairi, H.; Dari, K.; Bencharki, B.; Mayad, E.H.; Aassila, H. Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus velezensis RS65 Against Phytophthora infestans: A Sustainable Strategy for Managing Tomato Late Blight. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Petrova, P.; Gerginova, M.; Arsov, A.; Armenova, N.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Gergov, E.; Petrov, K. Whole-genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis strain R22 isolated from Oryza sativa rhizosphere in Bulgaria. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2023, 12, e00693-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gao, Z.; Zhao, J. Bacillus velezensis G-1 lipopeptides and genomics reveal biocontrol and probiotic traits against postharvest rot caused by Alternaria solani and Alternaria alternata. Food Microbiol. 2026, 134, 104928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Bao, X.; Hu, C.; Cao, J.; Sun, C. Genomic insights and antifungal role of fengycin from Bacillus velezensis HNI10 in the biocontrol of postharvest mango anthracnose. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2026, 239, 114395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, M.; Jia, M.; Tian, Y.; Su, L.; Tian, H.; Liu, G.; Hu, J.; Zhang, X. Molecular insights into the antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis JLU-53 against Cochliobolus heterostrophus in maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2026, 218, 106942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Kumar, A.; Fadiji, A.E.; Babalola, O.O.; Puopolo, G.; Santoyo, G. Agroecological Management of the Grey Mould Fungus Botrytis cinerea by Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Plants 2023, 12, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Shao, L.; Wang, B.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Song, S.; Zhao, H.; Pu, Y.; Rui, M.; Sun, Z.; et al. Genome and antimicrobial compounds analysis of Bacillus subtilis M51 as a potential biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum. BMC Genom. 2026, 27, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Touati, R.; Masiello, M.; Pentimone, I.; Somma, S.; Haidukowski, M.; Moretti, A.; De Bellis, P. Genomic and functional characterization of Bacillus strains active against Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol. 2026, 17, 1832933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ananev, A.A.; Aleynova, O.A.; Nityagovsky, N.N.; Dneprovskaya, A.A.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Xin, H.; Kiselev, K.V. Whole-Genome Assembly and Antimicrobial Properties of Bacillus atrophaeus R7PjV2-12 from Spruce Picea jezoensis. Microbiol. Res. 2026, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mihaylova-Garnizova, R.; Davidova, S.; Hodzhev, Y.; Satchanska, G. Antimicrobial Peptides Derived from Bacteria: Classification, Sources, and Mechanism of Action against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ma, X. Purification and characterization of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilius and their antibacterial effects on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Process Biochem. 2024, 146, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, D.; Li, Q.; Jiang, H.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Z. Surfactin–Bacillaene Copathway Engineering Strategy Boosts Fengycin Production and Antifungal Activity in Bacillus velezensis HN-Q-8. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]










| Component (g/L) | Medium A | Medium B | Medium C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sucrose | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soybean meal | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| MgSO4 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| CaCl2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| MnSO4 | – | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| K2HPO4 | – | 1 | – |
| FeSO4 | – | – | 0.2 |
| Peak | Retention Times (min) | Observed Ion (m/z) | Identified Metabolite | Peak Area | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 8.6–9.2 | 748.4102 [M+2H]2+ 1495.8204 [M+H]+ | Linear C17 Fengycin A | 6013 | 1.5 |
| 755.3837 [M+2H]2+ 1509.7674 [M+H]+ | Linear C18 Fengycin A | 2618 | 0.6 | ||
| 7 | 9.5–10.3 | 762.4221 [M+2H]2+ 1523.8441 [M+H]+ | Linear C19 Fengycin A | 19,953 | 4.9 |
| 8 | 10.3–10.7 | 732.3081 [M+2H]2+ 1463.6161 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin A/C14 Fengycin B | 9248 | 2.3 |
| 9 | 10.7–11.1 | 732.2972 [M+2H]2+ 1463.5865 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin A | 9446 | 2.3 |
| 747.3161 [M+2H]2+ 1493.6222 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin B | 1069 | 0.3 | ||
| 10 | 11.1–11.5 | 769.3884 [M+2H]2+ 1537.7768 [M+H]+ | Linear C18 Fengycin B | 6066 | 1.5 |
| 11 | 11.5–11.9 | 746.3103 [M+2H]2+ 1491.6128 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin B/C17 Fengycin B2 | 19,047 | 5.0 |
| 757.2995 [M+2Na]2+ 1513.5917 [M+Na]+ | 1615 | ||||
| 12 | 11.9–12.5 | 739.3040 [M+2H]2+ 1477.6237 [M+H]+ | C17 Fengycin A | 26,438 | 7.1 |
| 750.2928 [M+2Na]2+ 1499.5757 [M+Na]+ | 2147 | ||||
| 13 | 12.5–12.9 | 754.3262 [M+2H]2+ 1507.6685 [M+H]+ | Linear C17 Fengycin B2 with monounsaturated fatty acid | 21,533 | 5.2 |
| 14 | 12.9–13.8 | 753.3170 [M+2H]2+ 1505.6490 [M+H]+ | C17 Fengycin B | 107,731 | 28.5 |
| 764.3066 [M+2Na]2+ 1527.6048 [M+Na]+ | 9610 | ||||
| 15 | 13.8–14.1 | 724.3001 [M+2H]2+ 1469.5711 [M+Na]+ | C15 Fengycin A | 12,002 | 3.2 |
| 735.2901 [M+2Na]2+ 1469.5711 [M+Na]+ | 1019 | ||||
| 16 | 14.1–14.5 | 740.3580 [M+2H]2+ 1479.7068 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin B/C18 Fengycin A | 14,682 | 3.6 |
| 17 | 14.5–15.7 | 738.3138 [M+2H]2+ 1475.6417 [M+H]+ | C17 Fengycin A with monounsaturated fatty acid | 79,862 | 19.4 |
| 18 | 15.7–17.0 | 745.3201 [M+2H]2+ 1489.6555 [M+H]+ | C18 Fengycin A with monounsaturated fatty acid | 49,445 | 12.0 |
| 760.3236 [M+2H]2+ 1519.6395 [M+H]+ | C18 Fengycin B/C19 Fengycin B2 | 10,767 | 2.6 | ||
| Total | 410,311 | 100% |
| Peak | Retention Times (min) | Observed Ion (at m/z) | Identified Metabolite | Peak Area | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 9.2–10 | 755.3836 [M+2H]2+ 1509.7672 [M+H]+ | Linear C18 Fengycin A/Linear C16 Fengycin B | 1279 | 1.8 |
| 748.4105 [M+2H]2+ 1495.821 [M+H]+ | Linear C17 Fengycin A | 1879 | 2.6 | ||
| 12 | 10.9–11.3 | 773.3824 [M+H+Na]2+ | Linear C19 Fengycin A | 6755 | 16.7 |
| 762.4221 [M+2H]2+ 1523.8442 [M+H]+ | 5413 | ||||
| 733.3732 [M+2H]2+ 1465.7336 [M+H]+ | C14 Fengycin A2 | 3683 | 10.6 | ||
| 744.3641 [M+H+Na]2+ | 4028 | ||||
| 13 | 11.6–12.0 | 747.3894 [M+2H]2+ 1493.7688 [M+H]+ | C16 Fengycin B | 11,471 | 31.2 |
| 758.3797 [M+H+Na]2+ | 11,179 | ||||
| 14 | 13.8–14.1 | 754.3977 [M+2H] 2+ 1507.7954 [M+H]+ | Linear C17 Fengycin B2/Linear C16 Fengycin B with monounsaturated | 7806 | 18.9 |
| 765.3881 [M+H+Na]2+ | fatty acid | 5879 | |||
| 753.3170 [M+2H]2+ 1505.6490 [M+H]+ | C17 Fengycin B/C19 Fengycin A | 2069 | 2.9 | ||
| 15 | 16.2–16.5 | 769.4364 [M+2Na]2+ 1515. 8628 [M+Na]+ | C18 Fengycin A/C16 Fengycin B | 2245 | 3.1 |
| 782.3721 [M+2Na]2+ 1541.7348 [M+Na]+ | C18 Fengycin B/C19 Fengycin B2 | 2225 | 7.7 | ||
| 760.3536 [M+2H]2+ 1519.7348 [M+H]+ | 3356 | ||||
| 745.3201 [M+2H]2+ 1489.6402 [M+H]+ | C17 Fengycin B2 with monounsaturated fatty acid | 3298 | 4.5 | ||
| Total | 72,545 | 100% |
| Peak | Retention Times (min) | Observed Ion (m/z) | Identified Metabolite | Peak Area | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 17.1–18.6 | 1040.6442 [M+H]+ | Linear C14 Surfactin A | 30,370 | 3.2 |
| 1062.6235 [M+Na]+ | 18,832 | ||||
| 20 | 18.7–19.7 | 1054.6782 [M+H]+ | Linear C15 Surfactin A | 44,886 | 4.7 |
| 1076.6586 [M+Na]+ | 28,305 | ||||
| 21 | 19.7–20.2 | 1022.6255 [M+H]+ 1044.6048 [M+Na]+ | C14 Surfactin B* | 27,103 19,061 | 3.0 |
| 22 | 20.2–21.0 | 1008.6120 [M+H]+ | C13 Surfactin A/C14 Surfactin B | 63,921 | 7.1 |
| 1030.5915 [M+Na]+ 515.7361 [M+2Na]2+ | 45,607 | ||||
| 23 | 21.1–21.9 | 1036.6399 [M+H]+ | C14 Surfactin B | 46,982 | 4.9 |
| 1058.5193 [M+Na]+ | 29,095 | ||||
| 24 | 22.0–23.2 | 1022.6256 [M+H]+ 1044. 6052 [M+Na]+ | C14 Surfactin A | 343,298 | 22.3 |
| 25 | 23.4–24.2 | 1036.6401 [M+H]+ 518.8641 [M+2H]2+ | C15 Surfactin A | 527,433 | 37.7 |
| 1058.6188 [M+Na]+ | 53,822 | ||||
| 26 | 24.2–24.7 | 1022.6272 [M+H]+ 1044.6070 [M+Na]+ | C15 Surfactin B | 42,711 12,586 | 3.6 |
| 27 | 24.9–25.7 | 1036.6422 [M+H]+ | C16 Surfactin B | 71,820 | 6.4 |
| 1058.6212 [M+Na]+ | 26,227 | ||||
| 1050.6556 [M+H]+ | C16 Surfactin A | 52,799 | 5.1 | ||
| 1072.6346 [M+Na]+ | 25,929 | ||||
| 28 | 25.7–26.3 | 1036.6411 [M+H]+ | C16 Surfactin B | 17,936 | 1.2 |
| 29 | 26.3–26.9 | 1050.6545 [M+H]+ | C16 Surfactin A/C17 Surfactin B | 4028 | 0.5 |
| 1072.6344 [M+Na]+ | 2696 | ||||
| 1064.6688 [M+H]+ | C17 Surfactin A | 3990 | 0.5 | ||
| 1086.6487 [M+Na]+ | 3451 | ||||
| Total | 1,542,888 | 100.0 |
| Peak | Retention Times (min) | Observed Ion (m/z) | Identified Metabolite | Peak Area | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 22–23.2 | 1022.6017 [M+H]+ | C14 Surfactin A | 203,250 | 19.9 |
| 1044.6058 [M+Na]+ | 32,012 | ||||
| 1030.6385 [M+Na]+ | C14 Surfactin B | 43,379 | 5.7 | ||
| 1008.6486 [M+H]+ | 23,357 | ||||
| 21 | 23.8–24.2 | 1036.6820 [M+H]+ | C15 Surfactin A | 50,769 | 13.1 |
| 22 | 24.2–24.6 | 1058.664 [M+Na]+ | 104,478 | ||
| 23 | 25.0–25.9 | 1050.7004 [M+H]+ | C16 C Surfactin A | 161,025 | 25.2 |
| 1072.6853 [M+Na]+ | 136,872 | ||||
| 1036.6882 [M+H]+ | C16 C Surfactin B | 4830 | 0.4 | ||
| 24 | 25.9–26. 4 | 1050.7131 [M+H]+ | C17 Surfactin B | 201,282 | 30.2 |
| 1072.6945 [M+Na]+ | 156,407 | ||||
| 25 | 26.4–26.7 | 1064.7166 [M+H]+ | C17 Surfactin A | 19,658 | 1.9 |
| 1086.6881 [M+Na]+ | 2489 | ||||
| 26 | 26.7–27.1 | 1064.7141 [M+H]+ | C17 Surfactin A/C18 Surfactin B | 36,756 | 3.6 |
| 1086.6983 [M+Na]+ | 7467 | ||||
| Total | 1,184,031 | 100.0 |
| Lipopeptide | Observed Ion (m/z) | Molecular Mass (Da) | Amino Acid Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear C17 Fengycin A | 748.4102 [M+2H]2+ 1495.8204 [M+H]+ | 1494.84 | Glu-Orn-Thr-Glu-Ala-Pro-Gln-Tyr-IleCOOH |
| Linear C18 Fengycin A | 755.3806 [M+2H]2+ 1509.7612 [M+H]+ | 1508.84 | Glu-Orn-Thr-Glu-Ala-Pro-Gln-Tyr-IleCOOH |
| Linear C19 Fengycin A | 762.4221 [M+2H]2+ 1523.8442 [M+H]+ | 1522.85 | Glu-Orn-Thr-Glu-Ala-Pro-Gln-Tyr-IleCOOH |
| Linear C20 Fengycin A/ Linear C18 Fengycin B | 769.3884 [M+2H]2+ 1537.7768 [M+H]+ | 1536.87 | Glu-Orn-Thr-Glu-Ala-Pro-Gln-Tyr-IleCOOH/ Glu-Orn-Thr-Glu-Val-Pro-Gln-Tyr-IleCOOH |
| C14 Surfactin A | 1040.6442 [M+H]+ | 1039.68 | Glu-Leu/Ile-Leu-Val-Asp-Leu-LeuCOOH |
| C15 Surfactin A | 1054.6782 [M+H]+ | 1053.69 | Glu-Leu/Ile-Leu-Val-Asp-Leu-LeuCOOH |
| Peak | Retention Time (min) | Observed Ion (m/z) | Theoretical Mass (Da) | Relative Error Δppm (ppm) | Molecular Formula | Identified Metabolite | Peak Area | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2.8–3.1 | 581.3538 [M+H]+ | 581.3590 | −8.95 | C34H48N2O6 | Bacillaene A | 2653 | |
| 603.3414 [M+Na]+ | 603.3410 | +0.66 | 921 | 2.0 | ||||
| 619.3195 [M+K]+ | 619.3149 | +7.43 | 5094 | |||||
| 4 | 3.1–4.4 | 905.2484 [M+Na]+ | 905.2476 | +2.98 | C39H42N6O18 | Bacillibactin | 28,078 | 6.7 |
| 883.2664 [M+H]+ | 883.2637 | +3.06 | 1384 | |||||
| 567.2885 [M+Na]+ | 567.2852 | +5.82 | C31H45O6P | Dificidin | 21,751 | 5.0 | ||
| 5 | 4.6–5.1 | 583.3724 [M+H]+ | 583.3742 | −3.08 | C34H50N2O6 | Dihydrobacillaene | 9496 | 2.8 |
| 605.3548 [M+Na]+ | 605.3567 | −3.14 | 2855 | |||||
| 527.2022 [M+ K]+ | 488.2410 | −3.79 | C27H36O8 | 7-O-Malonyl macrolactin A | 23,904 | 5.5 | ||
| 8 | 6.5–6.8 | 703.2745 [M+K]+ | 703.2745 | +1.85 | C34H48O13 | Macrolactin D | 1184 | 0.4 |
| 687.3005 [M+Na]+ | 664.3095 | +1.75 | 557 | |||||
| 27 | 25.7–26.3 | 511.2298 [M+Na]+ | 511.2308 | −1.96 | C27H36O8 | 7-O-Malonyl macrolactin A | 73,174 | 26.6 |
| 527.2018 [M+K]+ | 527.2042 | −4.55 | 67,808 | |||||
| 28 | 27.8–28.3 | 525.2416 [M+Na]+ | 525.2465 | −9.33 | C28H38O8 | 7-O-Succinyl macrolactin A | 76,491 | 35.4 |
| 541.2205 [M+K]+ | 541.2199 | +1.11 | 78,746 | |||||
| 29 | 28.3–28.8 | 425.2314 [M+Na]+ | 425.2298 | +2.35 | C24H34O5 | Macrolactin A | 25,987 | 15.6 |
| 441.2065 [M+K]+ | 441.2038 | +4.99 | 42,219 | |||||
| Total | 438,398 | 100 |
| Observed Ion (m/z) | Residue Range | Description | Fragment Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 388.1427 | 22–24 | Tetrapeptide fragment from the hydrophobic loop | FEI |
| 459.1769 | 22–25 | Sub-fragment of the FEIAGA series | FEIA |
| 516.1988 | 22–26 | Sub-fragment of the FEIAGA series | FEIAG |
| 587.2325 | 22–27 | Sub-fragment of the FEIAGA series | FEIAGA |
| 480.1984 | 16–20 | Sub-fragment | DGPIP |
| 595.2196 | 16–21 | Sub-fragment of a proline-rich loop located between Cys13 and Phe22 | DGPIPD * |
| 630.24 | 10–14 | Sub-fragment | GAACL |
| 694.29 | 9–14 | Sub-fragment | IGAACL |
| 747.28 | 8–14 | Sub-fragment | SIGAACL |
| 838.35 | 6–14 | Sub-fragment | TCSIGAACL |
| 856.37 | 6–14 | Sub-fragment | TCSIGAACL+H2O |
| 976.4 | 6–15 | Large internal fragment containing the previously identified sulfur-rich core, after ring-opening | TCSIGAACLV |
| Metabolite Group | Medium A (%) | Medium B (%) | Medium C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surfactins | 44.3 ± 1.0 | 34.0 ± 1.0 | 27.5 ± 1.0 |
| Fengycins | 15.5 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 2.5 ± 1.0 |
| Subtilosins | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | – |
| Polyketides | 1.4 ± 0.02 | 3.49± 0.02 | 8.85 ± 0.50 |
| Relative ratio | Surfactins:Fengycins:Subtilosins:Polyketides = 2.8:1:0.02:0.9 | Surfactins:Fengycins:Subtilosins:Polyketides = 11.3:1:0.17:1.2 | Surfactins:Fengycins:Polyketides = 11:1:3.5 |
| Purified Fraction (min) | Main Metabolites | Concentration (µg/mL) | Growth Inhibition (%) at 24 h | Growth Inhibition (%) 48 h | Growth Inhibition (%) at 72 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraction I | Mostly fengycin A and B isoforms and their homologues | 11.2 | 43.64 ± 0.5 | 47.09 ± 0.5 | 36.45 ± 0.5 |
| (Rt 12.3 min, | 22.3 | 47.67 ± 0.5 | 45.39 ± 0.4 | 39.91 ± 0.5 | |
| Buffer B 71%) | 44.6 | 51.19 ± 0.5 | 53.55 ± 0.6 | 41.73 ± 0.4 | |
| Fraction II | Predominantly Surfactin A and B and their homologues | 11.2 | 35.91 ± 0.4 | 31.51 ± 0.4 | 27.78 ± 0.4 |
| (Rt 17.2, | 22.3 | 37.28 ± 0.5 | 32.20 ± 0.5 | 28.05 ± 0.4 | |
| Buffer B 83%) | 44.6 | 39.09 ± 0.5 | 36.65 ± 0.5 | 30.57 ± 0.4 | |
| Whole cell-free supernatant | All metabolites | Complex mixture (not quantified) | 98.3 ± 3.0 | 86.6 ± 2.8 | 53.8 ± 2.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Dolashki, A.; Velkova, L.; Berovski, T.; Todorova, M.; Atanasov, V.; Gerginova, M.; Krumova, E.; Armenova, N.; Petrova, P.; Petrov, K.; et al. Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A. Fermentation 2026, 12, 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090433
Dolashki A, Velkova L, Berovski T, Todorova M, Atanasov V, Gerginova M, Krumova E, Armenova N, Petrova P, Petrov K, et al. Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A. Fermentation. 2026; 12(9):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090433
Chicago/Turabian StyleDolashki, Aleksandar, Lyudmila Velkova, Tsvetan Berovski, Maria Todorova, Ventseslav Atanasov, Maria Gerginova, Ekaterina Krumova, Nadya Armenova, Penka Petrova, Kaloyan Petrov, and et al. 2026. "Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A" Fermentation 12, no. 9: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090433
APA StyleDolashki, A., Velkova, L., Berovski, T., Todorova, M., Atanasov, V., Gerginova, M., Krumova, E., Armenova, N., Petrova, P., Petrov, K., & Dolashka, P. (2026). Antifungal Agents of Bacillus velezensis 5RB: Complex Action of Lipopeptides, Polyketides, and Subtilosin A. Fermentation, 12(9), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090433

