An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities of High-Moisture Corn at 35 °C and 5 °C
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
2.2. Determination of Fermentation Quality
2.3. Determination of Nutritional Quality
2.4. Aerobic Stability Test
2.5. Microbial Diversity Analysis
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of Fresh HMC Prior to Ensiling
3.2. Silage Fermentation Quality
3.3. Conventional Nutritional Components and Ammonia Nitrogen
3.4. Aerobic Stability
3.5. Effects of Temperature and Additives on Microbial Communities of HMC Silage After 28 Days of Fermentation
3.6. Microbial Community Composition
3.7. Prediction of Microbial Functions and Environmental Correlation
3.8. Correlation Between Microbial Species and Fermentation Indices
4. Discussion
4.1. Components Differentiated Antibacterial Mechanisms of CA at High and Low Temperatures and Solutions to Regional Silage Production Bottlenecks
4.2. CA Improves Fermentation and Aerobic Stability via Remodeling Microbial Community and Regulating Metabolic Potential
4.3. Mechanism of CA in Inhibiting Nutrient Degradation
4.4. Analysis of Correlation Mechanisms Between Microbial Species and Functions
4.5. Regulatory Effects of Additive CA on Bacterial Metabolic Networks and Silage Fermentation Quality
4.6. Analysis of the Linkage Mechanism Between Microbial Communities and Silage Quality Based on Correlations Between Species and Physicochemical Indices
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| HMC | High-moisture corn |
| CON | Control group |
| CA | Chemical additive |
| HCK | The control group at high temperature |
| HCA | The chemical additive group at high temperature |
| DCK | The control group at low temperature |
| DCA | The chemical additive group at low temperature |
| LAB | Lactic acid bacteria |
| ENB | Enterobacter |
| DM | Dry matter |
| CP | Crude protein |
| NH3-N | Ammonia nitrogen |
| WSC | Water-soluble carbohydrates |
| NDF | Neutral detergent fiber |
| ADF | Acid detergent fiber |
| PDA | Potato dextrose agar |
| MRS | de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe |
| VRBA | Violet red bile agar |
References
- Zhu, L.; Yan, Y.; Bao, J.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Z.; Sun, P.; Yan, X.; Liu, M.; Su, R.; Ge, G. Effects of ensiling temperature on fermentation quality, enzyme activities, and metabolomic profiles in Pediococcus acidilactici L10-inoculated native grass silage. BMC Plant Biol. 2026, 26, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bernardes, T.F.; De Oliveira, I.L.; Lara, M.A.S.; Casagrande, D.R.; Ávila, C.L.S.; Pereira, O.G. Effects of potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate at two application rates on fermentation and aerobic stability of maize silage. Grass Forage Sci. 2015, 70, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seppälä, A.; Heikkilä, T.; Mäki, M.; Rinne, M. Effects of additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages and total mixed rations. Grass Forage Sci. 2016, 71, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kwella, M.; Haaker, K.; Reuter, B. About investigations on the efficiency of silage additives. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Silage Research, Dublin, Ireland, 6–8 September 1993; pp. 99–100. [Google Scholar]
- Woolford, M.K. Microbiological screening of food preservatives, cold sterilants and specific antimicrobial agents as potential silage additives. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1975, 26, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, J.; Zhao, D. Effects of different additives on chemical composition, fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Leymus chinensis silage. Chin. Feed 2021, 22, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knicky, M.; Spörndly, R. Sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate and sodium nitrite as silage additives. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 2659–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Knicky, M.; Spörndly, R. The ensiling capability of a mixture of sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Saarisalo, E.; Jalava, T.; Skyttä, E.; Haikara, A.; Jaakkola, S. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants, formic acid, potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of wilted grass silage. Agric. Food Sci. 2006, 15, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.W.; Wu, H.; Meng, Q.X. Effects of different compound additives on fermentation quality, aerobic stability and bacterial community of whole-plant corn silage. Chin. Feed 2023, 13, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Jia, P.Y.; Wu, R.; Zhou, X.; Han, Y.Q.; Feng, N.J. Rapid determination of four organic acids in silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Feed Res. 2019, 42, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kung, L., Jr.; Smith, M.L.; da Silva, E.B.; Windle, M.C.; da Silva, T.C.; Polukis, S.A. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a chemical additive based on sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 5949–5960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Krishnamoorthy, U.; Muscato, T.V.; Sniffen, C.J.; Van Soest, P.J. Nitrogen fractions in selected feedstuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 2002, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bai, C.S.; Pan, G.; Leng, R.X.; Ni, W.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Sun, J.J.; Yu, Z.; Liu, Z.G.; Xue, Y.L. Effect of ensiling density and storage temperature on fermentation quality, bacterial community, and nitrate concentration of sorghum–sudangrass silage. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 828320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guo, X.; Zhao, J.X.; Li, J.Y.; Feng, Y.Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.B. Effects of different additives on nutritional components, fermentation quality and microbial diversity of high-moisture corn grains under low temperature. Chin. J. Anim. Sci. 2026, Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, P.; Bai, B.; Liu, M.; Ma, W.; Liu, J.; Song, C.; Du, S.; Ge, G.; Jia, Y.; Wang, Z. Effects of different additives and ratios on broom sorghum straw silage characteristics and bacterial communities. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Douglas, G.M.; Maffei, V.J.; Zaneveld, J.R.; Yurgel, S.N.; Brown, J.R.; Taylor, C.M.; Huttenhower, C.; Langille, M.G.I. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Lu, Z.H.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Wu, F.J.; Peng, X. Improvement Study on Pre-treatment Methods for Determination of Benzoic Acid and Sorbic Acid in Fermented Milk. China Dairy Ind. 2026, 4, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.F.; Wang, L.L.; Jeong, E.C.; Kim, H.J.; Ahmadi, F.; Kim, J.G. Effects of sodium diacetate or microbial inoculants on aerobic stability of wilted rye silage. Anim. Biosci. 2022, 35, 1871–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yang, D.; Yin, H.X.; Zhang, Q. Impacts of phenyllactic acid and temperature on the fermentation quality and antibiotic resistance genes of corn straw silage. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2024, 32, 2290–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, J.; Ding, Z.; Su, R.; Wang, M.; Cheng, M.; Xie, D.; Guo, X. Storage temperature is more effective than lactic acid bacteria inoculations in manipulating fermentation and bacterial community diversity, co-occurrence and functionality of the whole-plant corn silage. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00101-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, T.; Bao, Y.; Xu, B.; Shen, Y.; Yuan, X. Sustainable use of agricultural residues to improve corn silage quality: Co-ensiling with oregano oil residues. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 371, 123172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Taylor, C.C.; Kung, L., Jr. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of high moisture corn in laboratory silos. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1526–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zheng, M.; Niu, D.; Jiang, D.; Li, R.; Meng, L.; Xu, C. Metagenome analyses reveal the role of Clostridium perfringens in alfalfa silage anaerobic deterioration. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.H.; Zhang, Y.G.; He, Y.F. The effect of adding two type of sodium acetate compounds on corn silage quality and aerobic stability. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2008, 6, 1810–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, R.H. Isolation and Identification of Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria from Gramineous Forages and Their Effects on Silage Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, N.; Ding, C.; Wang, X.; Tian, J.; Nazar, M.; Liu, B. Separating chemical and microbial effects on ensiling characteristics and microbial community assembly during Italian ryegrass silage fermentation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2026, 247, 123498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kaewpila, C.; Gunun, P.; Tongkasee, P.; Puangploy, P.; Khota, W. Ensiling characteristics and in vitro rumen fermentation of Sesbania grandiflora pods prepared with inhibitory and stimulatory additives. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 22758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Stratford, M.; Plumridge, A.; Nebe-von-Caron, G.; Archer, D.B. Inhibition of spoilage mould conidia by acetic acid and sorbic acid involves different modes of action, requiring modification of the classical weak-acid theory. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 136, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ahmadi, F.; Lee, W.H.; Kwak, W.S. A novel combination of sodium metabisulfite and a chemical mixture based on sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite for aerobic preservation of fruit and vegetable discards and lactic acid fermentation in a total mixed ration for ruminants. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 1479–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ma, J.; Zi, X.; Wu, S.; Ma, Y.; Liang, R.; Yang, J.; Yao, J.; Li, M.; Li, Z. Multi-omics insights into the regulatory mechanism of citric acid in silage fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 436, 133025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Feng, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ling, W.; Degen, A.A.; Zhou, Y.; Ge, C.; Yang, F.; Zhou, J. Ensiling hybrid Pennisetum with lactic acid bacteria or organic acids improved the fermentation quality and bacterial community. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1216722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.; Chang, J.; Hu, Z.F. Harmful microorganisms in silage and their inhibition measures. Acta Nutr. Anim. 2017, 29, 4308–4314. [Google Scholar]









| Item | Mean | SE |
|---|---|---|
| DM% | 65.57 | 0.54 |
| pH | 6.18 | 0.03 |
| CP% DM | 6.98 | 0.06 |
| NDF% DM | 10.96 | 0.07 |
| ADF% DM | 3.32 | 0.18 |
| WSC% DM | 2.00 | 0.14 |
| LAB log10 CFU/g FW | 6.71 | 0.18 |
| Yeasts log10 CFU/g FW | 5.88 | 0.13 |
| ENB log10 CFU/g FW | 6.72 | 0.17 |
| Item | DM % | pH | Lactic Acid % DM | Acetic Acid % DM | Ethanol % DM | LAB log10 CFU/g FW | Yeasts log10 CFU/g FW | ENB log10 CFU/g FW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 °C | 3 d | CON | 63.57 c | 4.22 f | 1.33 c | 0.32 b | 0.15 c | 8.88 bc | 5.85 a | 4.06 e |
| CA | 65.04 ab | 4.09 fg | 2.30 ab | 0.35 ab | 0.09 de | 8.62 c | BDL d | BDL f | ||
| 7 d | CON | 64.06 bc | 4.15 fg | 1.36 c | 0.34 ab | 0.12 cd | 7.42 de | 5.46 ab | BDL f | |
| CA | 64.70 abc | 4.08 fg | 2.37 a | 0.38 a | 0.09 de | 7.82 d | BDL d | BDL f | ||
| 28 d | CON | 64.85 abc | 4.10 fg | 2.22 b | 0.38 a | 0.11 cd | 5.80 f | 4.59 b | BDL f | |
| CA | 64.96 ab | 4.02 g | 2.35 a | 0.38 a | 0.07 e | 4.95 g | BDL d | BDL f | ||
| 5 °C | 3 d | CON | 63.90 bc | 6.16 b | 0.82 d | 0.20 c | 0.23 ab | 9.40 a | BDL d | 8.78 a |
| CA | 65.74 a | 6.52 a | 0.73 e | 0.20 c | 0.25 a | 8.80 bc | BDL d | 6.92 b | ||
| 7 d | CON | 64.12 bc | 5.11 d | 0.87 d | 0.22 c | 0.20 b | 9.21 ab | 5.96 a | 6.38 c | |
| CA | 64.88 abc | 5.76 c | 0.82 d | 0.22 c | 0.22 ab | 9.19 ab | 1.33 c | 4.93 d | ||
| 28 d | CON | 64.30 bc | 4.46 e | 1.33 c | 0.30 b | 0.14 c | 7.04 e | 6.56 a | 4.22 e | |
| CA | 64.68 abc | 4.47 e | 1.38 c | 0.30 b | 0.11 cd | 7.22 e | BDL d | BDL f | ||
| SEM | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 0.54 | ||
| Temperature means | 35 °C | 64.53 | 4.11 b | 2.00 a | 0.38 a | 0.11 b | 7.25 b | 2.65 a | 0.68 b | |
| 5 °C | 64.6 | 5.41 a | 1.00 b | 0.27 b | 0.19 a | 8.48 a | 2.31 b | 5.21 a | ||
| SEM | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.04 | ||
| Day means | 3 d | 64.56 | 5.25 a | 1.29 c | 0.28 b | 0.18 a | 8.93 a | 1.46 c | 4.94 a | |
| 7 d | 64.44 | 4.78 b | 1.35 b | 0.39 a | 0.16 a | 8.41 b | 3.19 a | 2.83 b | ||
| 28 d | 64.7 | 4.26 c | 1.82 a | 0.37 a | 0.11 b | 6.26 c | 2.79 b | 1.05 c | ||
| SEM | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.05 | ||
| Additive means | CON | 64.13 b | 4.70 b | 1.32 b | 0.29 | 0.16 a | 7.96 | 4.74 a | 3.91 a | |
| CA | 65.00 a | 4.82 a | 1.66 a | 0.31 | 0.14 b | 7.77 | 0.22 b | 1.97 b | ||
| SEM | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.03 | ||
| p-value | T | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** | |
| D | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ||
| A | *** | *** | *** | NS | ** | NS | *** | *** | ||
| T × D | NS | *** | * | * | *** | *** | *** | *** | ||
| T × A | NS | *** | *** | NS | ** | NS | ** | *** | ||
| D × A | NS | *** | *** | NS | NS | * | *** | *** | ||
| T × D × A | NS | *** | *** | NS | NS | ** | *** | *** | ||
| Item | CP %DM | NDF %DM | ADF %DM | WSC %DM | NH3-N %DM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 °C | CON | 6.31 c | 13.93 a | 3.53 ab | 0.37 c | 0.18 a |
| CA | 6.98 ab | 10.57 b | 3.39 b | 0.65 a | 0.14 bc | |
| 5 °C | CON | 6.95 b | 14.09 a | 3.71 a | 0.49 b | 0.15 b |
| CA | 7.07 a | 11.00 b | 3.57 ab | 0.40 c | 0.14 c | |
| SEM | 0.09 | 0.50 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0 | |
| Temperature means | 35 °C | 6.65 b | 12.25 | 3.46 b | 0.50 a | 0.16 a |
| 5 °C | 7.00 a | 12.55 | 3.64 a | 0.45 b | 0.15 b | |
| SEM | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0 | |
| Additive means | CON | 6.62 b | 14.01 a | 3.62 | 0.43 b | 0.17 a |
| CA | 7.03 a | 10.79 b | 3.48 | 0.53 a | 0.14 b | |
| SEM | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0 | |
| p-value | T | *** | NS | * | * | ** |
| A | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | |
| T × A | *** | NS | NS | *** | * | |
| Item | AS + 0 d | AS + 7 d | SEM | TTEST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | CA | CON | CA | CON | CA | ||
| 35 °C | |||||||
| DM% | 64.85 b | 64.44 b | 71.05 a | 71.36 a | 0.95 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| pH | 4.10 b | 4.02 c | 4.28 a | 4.11 b | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Lactic acid% DM | 2.22 b | 2.35 a | 1.50 d | 1.62 c | 0.11 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Acetic acid% DM | 0.38 a | 0.38 a | 0.28 b | 0.29 b | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| Ethanol% DM | 0.11 a | 0.07 b | 0.13 a | 0.11 a | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| LAB log10 CFU/g FW | 5.8 b | 4.95 c | 5.41 bc | 7.17 a | 0.26 | 0.06 | <0.01 |
| Yeasts log10 CFU/g FW | 4.59 b | BDL | 5.65 a | BDL | 0.78 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| ENB log10 CFU/g FW | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 0 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| CP% DM | 6.31 c | 6.98 a | 6.23 c | 6.62 b | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| NH3-N% DM | 0.18 a | 0.14 b | 0.19 a | 0.15 b | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.26 |
| WSC% DM | 0.37 c | 0.65 a | 0.33 d | 0.43 b | 0.04 | 0.03 | <0.01 |
| NDF% DM | 13.93 a | 10.57 b | 14.75 a | 10.58 b | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.49 |
| ADF% DM | 3.39 b | 3.53 b | 3.91 a | 3.58 b | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.14 |
| 5 °C | |||||||
| DM% | 64.3 c | 64.68 c | 69.05 b | 71.57 a | 0.92 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| pH | 4.46 b | 4.47 b | 7.34 a | 4.38 c | 0.38 | <0.01 | 0.05 |
| Lactic acid% DM | 1.33 b | 1.38 b | 0.34 c | 1.50 a | 0.14 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| Acetic acid% DM | 0.30 a | 0.30 a | 0.14 b | 0.30 a | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.49 |
| Ethanol% DM | 0.14 b | 0.11 b | 0.30 a | 0.16 b | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| LAB log10 CFU/g FW | 7.04 b | 7.22 a | 5.24 c | 5.38 c | 0.28 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Yeasts log10 CFU/g FW | 6.56 b | BDL | 8.27 a | 5.20 c | 0.93 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| ENB log10 CFU/g FW | 4.22 b | BDL | 5.74 a | 3.08 c | 0.64 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| CP% DM | 6.95 a | 7.07 a | 5.46 c | 6.76 b | 0.19 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| NH3-N% DM | 0.15 b | 0.14 b | 0.30 a | 0.15 b | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.05 |
| WSC% DM | 0.49 a | 0.40 ab | 0.30 b | 0.28 b | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| NDF% DM | 14.09 b | 11.00 c | 15.07 a | 11.62 c | 0.52 | <0.01 | 0.08 |
| ADF% DM | 3.71 b | 3.57 b | 3.97 a | 3.80 ab | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Item | Chao1 | Good’s_Coverage | Simpson | Pielou_E | Shannon | Observed_Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | ||||||
| HCK | 283.66 c | 1.00 a | 0.99 c | 0.82 a | 6.64 c | 275.00 c |
| HCA | 307.55 c | 1.00 a | 0.99 b | 0.84 a | 6.86 b | 298.67 c |
| DCK | 880.60 a | 1.00 c | 0.99 a | 0.75 b | 7.33 a | 841.67 a |
| DCA | 524.65 b | 1.00 b | 0.99 b | 0.77 b | 6.93 b | 510.00 b |
| SEM | 72.32 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 68.65 |
| p-value | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Fungi | ||||||
| HCK | 54.94 b | 1.00 a | 0.55 c | 0.35 d | 1.97 d | 48.67 b |
| HCA | 100.62 b | 1.00 a | 0.80 b | 0.49 c | 3.03 c | 76.00 b |
| DCK | 684.48 a | 0.99 b | 0.90 a | 0.55 b | 5.00 b | 536.67 a |
| DCA | 568.51 a | 0.99 b | 0.96 a | 0.65 a | 5.79 a | 478.00 a |
| SEM | 86.33 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 68.3 |
| p-value | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Item | HCK | HCA | DCK | DCA | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | ||||||
| Lacticaseibacillus casei | 0.55 a | 0.30 b | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.07 | *** |
| Latilactobacillus curvatus | 0.05 c | 0.05 c | 0.40 a | 0.32 b | 0.05 | *** |
| Toxopsis calypsus | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.14 b | 0.23 a | 0.03 | *** |
| Lactobacillus sp. JCM 20061 | 0.21 a | 0.13 b | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.03 | *** |
| Cylindrospermopsis sp. CHAB3423 | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.10 b | 0.17 a | 0.02 | *** |
| Lacticaseibacillus paracasei | 0.13 a | 0.09 b | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0 | *** |
| Synechococcus sp. MH305 | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.09 b | 0.13 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Tepidibacter formicigenes | 0.00 b | 0.11 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.02 | *** |
| Leuconostoc citreum | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.11 a | 0.00 b | 0.01 | *** |
| Hapalosiphon sp. SAG 2376 | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.04 b | 0.05 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Levilactobacillus brevis | 0.00 b | 0.07 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Marinobacterium sp. | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.01 b | 0.06 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Lactococcus cremoris | 0.00 c | 0.01 c | 0.03 a | 0.02 ab | 0 | * |
| Clostridium sp. CYP4 | 0.00 b | 0.03 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.03 a | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Cutibacterium acnes | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Clostridium sp. mbf_VZ 132 | 0.00 b | 0.02 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Romboutsia timonensis | 0.00 b | 0.02 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0 | NS |
| Leuconostoc mesenteroides | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.01 a | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Bacillus cereus | 0.00 b | 0.01 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0 | * |
| Others | 0.03 c | 0.14 a | 0.05 b | 0.03 c | 0.01 | *** |
| Fungi | ||||||
| Nakaseomyces glabratus | 0.90 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.12 | *** |
| Ustilago maydis | 0.00 c | 0.07 b | 0.09 b | 0.19 a | 0.02 | *** |
| Mariannaea elegans | 0.00 b | 0.32 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.05 | * |
| Wickerhamomyces sp. | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.25 a | 0.05 b | 0.03 | *** |
| Papiliotrema flavescens | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.26 a | 0.03 b | 0.03 | *** |
| Aspergillus niger | 0.00 b | 0.24 a | 0.01 b | 0.03 b | 0.03 | * |
| Monascus purpureus | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | NS |
| Penicillium olsonii | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.04 b | 0.19 a | 0.02 | *** |
| Geotrichum candidum | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.10 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Sarocladium zeae | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.02 b | 0.06 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Meyerozyma guilliermondii | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.03 b | 0.05 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Wickerhamomyces anomalus | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.05 a | 0.02 b | 0.01 | *** |
| Aspergillus fumigatus | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | NS |
| Polyschema sclerotigenum | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | NS |
| Aspergillus sp. | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.01 b | 0.04 a | 0.01 | *** |
| Pichia kudriavzevii | 0.05 a | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.01 | * |
| Pichia fermentans | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.04 a | 0.00 b | 0 | *** |
| Aspergillus pseudoglaucus | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.01 b | 0.03 a | 0 | *** |
| Hannaella sp. | 0.00 b | 0.00 b | 0.03 a | 0.00 b | 0 | ** |
| Metschnikowia sp. 11-1089 | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.02 a | 0.01 ab | 0 | NS |
| Others | 0.00 c | 0.02 c | 0.16 b | 0.19 a | 0.03 | *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Kong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, K.; Li, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, F.; Li, Y. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities of High-Moisture Corn at 35 °C and 5 °C. Fermentation 2026, 12, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080349
Wang Z, Yan Y, Kong L, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Xu K, Li M, Zhao L, Zhao F, Li Y. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities of High-Moisture Corn at 35 °C and 5 °C. Fermentation. 2026; 12(8):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080349
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Ziyan, Yumeng Yan, Lingzhi Kong, Yu Zhang, Zhixian Zhao, Kainan Xu, Muyang Li, Lei Zhao, Fangfang Zhao, and Yanbing Li. 2026. "An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities of High-Moisture Corn at 35 °C and 5 °C" Fermentation 12, no. 8: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080349
APA StyleWang, Z., Yan, Y., Kong, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Xu, K., Li, M., Zhao, L., Zhao, F., & Li, Y. (2026). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability and Microbial Communities of High-Moisture Corn at 35 °C and 5 °C. Fermentation, 12(8), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080349
