Next Article in Journal
Volatilomic and Sensorial Profiles of Cabernet Sauvignon Wines Fermented with Different Commercial Yeasts
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Proteomic Analysis of the Acetification Process of Komagataeibacter europaeus Using Different Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri MG4247 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MG4644 Against Oxidative Damage via NF-κB Signaling Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Impact of Alginite Mineral on Lactic Acid Bacteria

Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., 1111 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(8), 482; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11080482
Submission received: 1 July 2025 / Revised: 14 August 2025 / Accepted: 16 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025

Abstract

Studying the uses of different organic-mineral rocks is an expanding area of research. Although these materials have primarily been used in forestry and agriculture, other potential applications include cosmetics and nutrition. Alginite is a volcanic substance that resembles loam and is composed of clay minerals and extinct unicellular algae. Hungary’s unique and environmentally friendly agricultural utilization of alginite has sparked international interest and prompted further exploration of its potential applications. In recent years, studies have shown that alginate can be useful in agriculture and as a food supplement, the latter only when supplemented with lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB). On the contrary, our study investigates the application of alginite during the LAB fermentation, expecting higher cell numbers. Our experiments, conducted using small-scale impedimetric high-throughput equipment, revealed that alginite positively influenced total cell biomass regarding at least two of the three tested LAB species, confirming the enhancement hypothesis. We also thoroughly investigated the fermentations in a lab-scale bioreactor to validate these results. The boosting potential of alginite was verified for all tested LAB strains since, depending on the applied strain, alginite resulted in a 27–63% increase in cell dry weight for all tested LAB.

1. Introduction

The geological team of the Hungarian State Geological Institute discovered the country’s first alginite deposit in November 1973 [1]. The formation is similar to conventional oil shale. Alginite colonies are defined more specifically as forming in volcanic craters and are primarily made of algae [1]. We currently know of four volcanic craters in Hungary that contain alginite based on research by the Hungarian State Geological Institute. All locations are in Transdanubia: Pula in Bakony, Gérce in Kemeneshát, Várkesz villages, and the southwest edge of Egyházaskesz village [1].
Alginite mineral rock is formed through the fossilization of accumulated organic (algae) and inorganic materials such as quartz, carbonates, clay, and modified amorphous silicic acid in a watery environment. Humic acids, as a component of alginite, are organic molecules that naturally form during long-term decomposition and transformation of biomass residues [2,3].
Humic substances (HSs) are complex organic materials that arise from the decomposition of plant and animal matter, and they exhibit a variety of properties that are crucial for their roles in soil health, plant growth, and microbial activity. These substances can be broadly categorized into three main fractions: humic acid, fulvic acid, and humin, each with distinct characteristics and functions [4,5]. The numerous positive research results are not surprising since humic substances have many beneficial properties, such as redox activity, surface activity, and being a nutrient source, thanks to which they can participate in many microbiological processes [6]. Humic substances also exhibit strong antioxidant properties, which can mitigate oxidative stress in biological systems. They contain polyphenolic components that contribute to their ability to scavenge free radicals, thus protecting cells from oxidative damage [7]. In addition to their effects on soil and plants, humic substances play a crucial role in microbial ecology. They serve as electron donors and acceptors in various redox reactions, facilitating anaerobic respiration in microorganisms [8,9]. This electron transfer capability is vital for the metabolic processes of many soil bacteria and can enhance the degradation of organic matter, thus contributing to nutrient cycling within ecosystems [8,9]. Furthermore, humic substances can stimulate microbial growth and activity (in the cow’s rumen), increasing fermentation efficiency and producing beneficial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids [10]. Moreover, there was an increase in the number of LAB found in chicks that were ten days old and had an inclusion level of 0.45% HSs. According to this finding, a humic compound derived from worm compost can be utilized as a growth enhancer component in broiler feeds.
Thanks to its unique composition, alginite has many benefits and uses in agriculture because of its water adsorption capability and pH-stabilizing effect. Numerous studies on this mineral have reported that, depending on the dose, alginite can significantly boost agricultural productivity [1,2,3]. Recent studies have explored innovative approaches to using alginite. For instance, it turned out that alginite is efficient in demulsification. The mineral contributed significantly to the demulsification of W/O emulsion, which was stable over two months—the emulsion was prepared from 50 wt.% crude oil (Brent type) and 50 wt.% brine. Furthermore, chemical analysis of the separated oil showed compliance with industrial standards [11,12].
Other researchers have found alginite to be gastroenterally beneficial with lactobacilli (LAB) in animal models [13,14,15]. In 2017, Hlubeňová K. and colleagues demonstrated the immunomodulatory potential of lactobacilli and humic substances present in alginite. The administration of L. reuteri and alginite in the group infected with S. typhimurium significantly stimulated the cellular immune response, particularly in the mesenteric lymph nodes of mice. This was evidenced by the activation of CD4 + CD8 + lymphocytes, natural killer and natural killer T cells, as well as the activation of phagocytosis within the innate immune system component [13]. In the same year, in a separate study, alginite was introduced into the canine diet at a dose of 1% for 14 days, along with probiotic supplementation. The combination of alginite and LAB decreased coliform and Clostridium-like bacteria while increasing the lactic acid bacteria of the gastrointestinal system, as well as hemoglobin concentration in blood. At the same time, the treatment stimulated cellular immunity parameters and an improvement in serum mineral levels [14]. Another research study reported comprehensive positive results comparable to those reported before regarding the combination of alginite with a probiotic strain [15]. Their research concentrated on the impact of a probiotic strain combined with alginite on the intestinal milieu of SPF mice infected with Salmonella typhimurium. The group supplemented with Lactobacillus reuteri CCM 8617 and alginite exhibited a significant decrease in the growth of S. typhimurium in mouse feces at 24 and 72 h (p < 0.001) post-infection. The addition of additives significantly influenced nitrogen, enzymatic, hepatic, and energy metabolism in mice. The effect of S. typhimurium infection on morphology was examined in the jejunum and ileum of the LAB group of mice. Mice livers subjected to treatment with both alginite and Lactobacillus reuteri CCM 8617 exhibited a significant decrease in overall inflammation, hepatocyte necrosis, and the size of typhoid nodules. These promising findings bring us one step closer to making better non-dairy probiotic products. A review by Chaudhary et al. (2024) emphasizes the individual roles of site-specific microbiomes in maintaining health and preventing diseases; furthermore, the complex interactions between different microbiomes across the body are also highlighted [16]. These interactions originate with the mouth and lungs, extending to the vagina, skin, and the central hub of the digestive system. Comprehensive research has demonstrated that the gut microbiota significantly influences the health of other microbiome sites and vice versa. Previously, the health benefits of probiotics were provided by milk/other dairy products. However, the growth of dairy probiotics is limited by lactose intolerance and health concerns related to cholesterol, allergic milk proteins, and fat content in dairy products [17,18,19]. Silanikove N. et al. (2015) state that 75% of the world’s population suffers from lactose intolerance [20]. The investigation of non-dairy probiotic products, which utilize food matrices derived from fruit, vegetables, and cereals, has received significant attention and has been widely studied due to a growing number of persons with lactose intolerance [21]. Species such as L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. lactis are the most employed in the development of novel probiotic products [22,23,24,25]. Hence, we have chosen particular strains of Lactococcus lactis, Lactocaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus for our research.
Given the positive influence of alginite and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on gastrointestinal function in animal models, as well as the growing need for lactose-free probiotic food products, we aimed to conduct an experimental study to examine the impact of alginite on the fermentation by potentially probiotic LAB strains. The assessment involved quantifying the fermentation process using multiple methodologies, like applying two cultivation systems (Bactrac® 4100 and fermenter), monitoring impedance levels, determining the specific colony-forming units (CFU/mL), and employing an online living cell sensor to monitor the fermentation progress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Used Strains and Media

The strains were ordered from the National Collection of Agricultural and Industrial Microorganisms (NCAIM). The following microorganisms and media were used in this study: L. rhamnosus (strain: NCAIM B.02274T, i.e., ATCC 7469, i.e., DSMZ 20021) in MRS medium, L. acidophilus (strain: NCAIM B.02085, i.e., ATCC 4356, i.e., DSMZ 20079) in MRS medium, and L. lactis (strain: NCAIM B.02123T, i.e., DSMZ 20661) in M17 medium.
MRS medium: Glucose 20 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, meat extract 10 g/L, yeast extract 5.0 g/L, sodium acetate 2.0 g/L, K2HPO4 2.0 g/L, ammonium citrate 2.0 g/L, MgSO4·7∙H2O 0.2 g/L, MnSO4·H2O 0.05 g/L, Tween 80 1.08 g/L.
M17 medium: Lactose 5 g/L, disodium glycerol-β-phosphate 10 g/L, tryptone 5.0 g/L, soy peptone 5.0 g/L, beef extract 5.0 g/L, yeast extract 2.5 g/L, L-ascorbic acid 0.5 g/L, MgSO4 0.25 g/L.
Alginite-added fermentation media were supplemented with 10 g/L of alginite mineral before sterilization. Alginite’s particle size was 20–40 microns, determined via sieving after mining near Gérce, Transdanubian region, Hungary. The used alginite mineral had an average 20-micron particle size. The used alginite contained, according to Kádár et al. [26], 4% moisture, 15% CaCO3, and 4.6% organic matter. Total N was 0.15%, K 63 mg/kg, Al-K2O 386 mg/kg, and Al-P2O5 216 mg/kg. The alginite used contained approximately 5% elemental Ca, 3.6% Al, 2.9% Fe, 1.9% Mg, 0.82% K, 0.15% P, and 0.12% S. Aqua regia soluble content was as follows: Ca 49.942 mg/kg, Al 36.026 mg/kg, Fe 28.501 mg/kg, Mg 19.188 mg/kg, K 8166 mg/kg, P 1501 mg/kg, S 1237 mg/kg, Mn 587 mg/kg, Na 454 mg/kg, Sr 419 mg/kg, Ba 281 mg/kg, Ni 75.0 mg/kg, Zn 65.8 mg/kg, Cr 63.9 mg/kg, B 26.8 mg/kg, Cu 19.2 mg/kg, Co 15.9 mg/kg, Pb 9.75 mg/kg, As 8.84 mg/kg, Sn 2.84 mg/kg, Mo 1.86 mg/kg, Se 1.02 mg/kg, Cd 0.12 mg/kg.

2.2. Fermentations

The small-scale fermentations were conducted in 10 mL reusable aerobic glass vials of the BacTrac® 4100 (Sy-Lab, Neupurkersdorf, Austria) instrument at a temperature of 37 °C, with a total liquid volume of 10 mL. In each vial, after sterilization with distilled water in an autoclave (121 °C, 20 min), the distilled water was replaced by 10 mL of the corresponding media (including or free from alginite), followed by inoculation with 20 μL cell suspension (1 sterile loop from fresh agar plate culture in 1 mL media). The fermentations were monitored using relative impedance changes of the medium (M%) as we had previously reported [27]. Uninoculated vials served as a reference since the relative impedance of the media may also vary. The BacMonitor Y 1.39Er program presented the results.
Specific growth rates of the static cultures were calculated from the derivative of generalized logistic equations as follows:
x = x m a x 1 + e a + b t + c t 2 + d t 3
s p e c i f i c   g r o w t h   r a t e   ( h 1 ) = 1 x d x d t = 1 x x 1 x x m a x b + 2 c t + 3 d t 2
where t represents fermentation time; x represents biomass cell dry weight; and a, b, c, d, and xmax represent model constants.
The bioreactor experiments were conducted in a 1 L benchtop bioreactor with a working volume of 0.8 L (Biostat Q fermenter, B. Braun Biotech International, Melsungen, Germany) with 5% v/v inoculum (having 109 CFU/mL). The temperature for production was set to 37 °C with an agitation speed of 300 rpm. The pH was regulated using 25% H3PO4 and 25% NaOH; the initial pH was set and held at 6.5 [28]. The cell count was followed during fermentation online, and observed time courses were compared by paired t-test with Statistica 13.5.
As a descriptive kinetic auxiliary model, the Weibull equation was used. Sigma Plot 7.0 was used for curve fitting of the Weibull equation as follows:
x = i f   t t 0 b ln 2 1 c ; x 0 ; x 0 + a 1 e t t 0 + b ln 2 1 / c b c
where t represents fermentation time; x represents biomass cell dry weight; and t0, x0, a, b, and c represent model constants.
Weibull was the best-fitting model among log-logistic, gamma, log-normal, and exponential in survival analysis using the Akaike information and Bayesian information criterion [29].

2.3. Analytic

A Waters Breeze HPLC system determined glucose and lactic acid content from samples. The instrument consisted of a Waters 717 Plus Autosampler (Wyatt Technology LLC, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), Waters 1515 Isocratic Pump (Wyatt Technology LLC), Biorad Aminex HPX 87H (300 × 7.8 mm, 9 µm) column (65 °C) (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), and Waters 2414 RI detector (40 °C) (Wyatt Technology LLC). After appropriate dilution steps, the samples were filtered with a 0.2-micron mixed ester syringe filter (ViaLab Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). The mobile phase was 5 mM H2SO4 in ion-exchanged water (Simplicity, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and the elution rate was 0.5 mL/min.
The colony-forming unit (CFU) determination was carried out as follows: Samples (1 mL/sample) were diluted ten-fold in a sterile Falcon tube with 9 mL of sterile saline (9.0 g/L NaCl). The ten-fold dilution was repeated six and seven times based on the expected cell count, and then 100 µL of the diluted samples was spread on MRS agar Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.
The dry matter was quantified by transferring 10 mL of fermentation broth from the BacTrac tubes into Falcon Conical Centrifuge Tubes, which were then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min using a Hermle Z200A centrifuge (Hermle, Wehingen, Germany). The supernatant was decanted, after which the cells were resuspended in distilled water and subjected to centrifugation again. The supernatant was decanted once again, and the biomass was placed into the crystallization cup with 2–3 mL of distilled water and dried expeditiously using the Sartorius MA35 moisture analyzer (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) until mass constancy [28].
For in-line living cell numbers, we used a Hamilton Incyte (Hamilton, Switzerland) viable cell density sensor. This sensor performs capacitance-based detection of living cells since it uses alternating current for polarizing biomass (dead cells cannot be polarized). By applying different frequencies, dielectric spectroscopy can be applied to determine the volume, size, and size distribution of living cells [30]. The registered permittivity is proportional to the living cell concentration. Moreover, capacitance sensors are insensitive to micro-carriers, gas bubbles, cell debris, and other particles in suspension [31].
To determine what percentage of alginite mineral total mass was lost via solubilization during fermentation and via dry matter measurement, where the water content and volatile compounds could vaporize, a calibration curve was constructed using 100 g/L lactic acid solution with 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 g/L alginite. Solutions were placed into BacTrac, where they could also be checked to see whether the alginite samples contained contaminants. After three days, the solutions were poured into Falcon tubes and then centrifuged, and the sediments were washed with distilled water as described above. Finally, the dry matter content of the sediment was measured and plotted versus alginite concentrations (Figure 1a). Furthermore, another solubilization test was prepared with lactic acid solutions of different concentrations, to which 10 g/L of alginite was added uniformly, modeling alginite solubilization during the lactobacillus fermentation. The concentration of lactic acid solutions was 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 g/L; the sample processing method was the same as the previous one. Finally, the dry matter content of the samples was measured and plotted versus lactic acid concentration (Figure 1b).

3. Results

Alginite, characterized by its notable humin and humic acid content, exhibits the potential to enhance the availability of trace elements to plants [32]. Furthermore, its buffering capacity contributes to the soil’s pH shift from acidic to neutral. These factors promote optimal plant growth and maximize crop yield [3]. Our expectations were similar in the fermentation experiments. Firstly, we examined the processes in static cultures using BacTrac. We observed a considerable difference between the fermentations supplemented with alginite (with A.) and without it (Figure 2). This suggests that the alginite positively affected these lactic acid-producing bacteria’s (LAB’s) cell growth because they have 2–3 times higher impedance levels than the alginite-free ones.
Maximum specific growth rates of the static cultures were determined through curve fitting, and the resulting values are presented in Figure 3. The results were similar in the case of particular growth rates and maximal impedance values: the µmax is significantly higher in all cases where alginite was used in the fermentation medium compared to the alginite-free cases.
To validate the observations above, we conducted measurements of biomass dry matter. In order to accurately determine the dry weight of biomass without interference originating from solid alginite, we used solubilization curves (see Figure 1). These curves revealed that 70% of the alginate remained as carbonates after reacting with lactic acid. Additionally, soluble and volatile compounds were released regardless of the lactic acid concentration at each alginite concentration tested. So, according to the solubilization curves, the remainder of the alginite was subtracted, and the final data is represented in Figure 4.
The dry mass results were not significantly different in the case of alginite-containing and alginite-free runs of L. lactis. In all other cases, alginite-containing fermentations resulted in significantly higher biomass dry weight, especially in the case of L. acidophilus, where biomass dry weight was three times higher than that in the normal alginite-free fermentations, which was considered a significant enhancement since p-values were lower than 0.05.
The effect of alginite addition to LAB fermentations was also compared in 1 L laboratory fermenters since probiotics are rarely produced in static cultures like BacTrac. While offline HPLC measurements monitored substrate and product concentrations, the biomass was followed by CFU determinations since solid alginite disturbed the commonly used optical density and cell dry weight measurements.
In the case of Lactococcus lactis fermentation, the sugar (lactose) consumption and the lactic acid production are the same (Figure 5a,b). Nevertheless, the CFU in alginite fermentation is ca. one order of magnitude higher (on a logarithmic scale) than in alginite-free fermentation.
During the fermentation of Lactocaseibacillus rhamnosus with alginite, the CFU reached a higher value by one order of magnitude, even though, for some reason, the starting sugar amount was less than in the alginite-free fermentation (Figure 5c,d). However, the product reached a higher concentration of 20% in the alginate-free fermentation, following the higher substrate amount consumed, and there was no more production after the 10th hour of fermentation.
We may infer that the production of lactic acid was slower from the flat curve showing product formation in the Lactobacillus acidophilus alginite-supplemented fermentation (Figure 5e,f). Interestingly, while the lactic acid production was slower, the CFUs were actually higher in the alginite-supplemented fermentation compared to the alginite-free fermentation, indicating a greater bacterial population despite the slower acid production.
The BacTrac static cultures’ cell dry weight (CDW) and bioreactor-based dynamic cultures’ CFU results are in full accordance; despite this, a third method was used to confirm the results: an online capacitance-based living cell sensor was also used and evaluated in bioreactor experiments (showing permittivity, which correlates with cell density) (Figure 6). This method shows only the living cells; other particles and the dead cells do not give a signal during the measurement.
In the case of all tested lactic acid bacteria, 1.5–2-fold higher cell density could be reached with alginite supplementation compared to alginite-free cultures.
We also measured dry matter during the fermentation processes to prevent the potential measurement-disturbing effect of alginite-released ions. These measurements consistently confirmed that fermentations involving alginite resulted in higher cell biomass at the end of the process (see Figure 7).
The results were corrected with the previously determined alginite residual amounts (Figure 1). So, in all cases of the tested strains’ fermentations, the alginite-supplemented ones significantly reached higher biomass dry matter. These observations are based on Figure 7 and contribute to declaring that alginite is beneficial for LAB biomass production, but based on Figure 5, alginite does not affect the fermentation products.

4. Discussion

Facilitating microbial growth, alginite has been demonstrated to improve the overall fermentation environment because the buffering capacity of alginite helps stabilize pH levels during fermentation, hence facilitating ideal conditions for microbial activity [15]. This stabilization can enhance fermentation rates and product yields, as pH changes can negatively impact microbial metabolism and fermentation efficiency [15]. Following the completion of our preliminary BacTrac investigations, we obtained the same result as well, given that the experiments lacked pH control. For this exact reason, the trials were carried out in a fermenter with a capacity of one liter, with constant mixing (300 rpm) and pH (6.5) that was controlled. Because of this, the buffer capacity that alginite offers cannot be taken into consideration in these experiments. The results were very remarkable in terms of the number of living cells as well as the amount of biomass that was produced.
We assume that the presence of humic substances (HSs) in alginite plays a crucial role in enhancing the amount of LAB biomass. Among the several types of soils, alginite has the lowest amount of aromatic carbon and the highest quantity of aliphatic carbon. The compared soils include lignite, lignohumate, acadian, compost, and alginite [33]. The source of alginite humic acids (HAs) is marine organic materials with some contribution of algae and not higher plants, as in soil or lignite. Lubica P. et al. (2015) found that alginite-derived humic acid and humic acids obtained from compost, lignohumates, and acadian sources are newly formed humic acids with a lower level of aromaticity, estimated to be around 40% [33]. Conversely, the humic acids obtained from soils and lignite demonstrate a notable degree of aromaticity, causing enhanced stability and reduced vulnerability to oxidation. The information on alginite is significant in comprehending our findings, as previous studies have demonstrated that humic compounds, regardless of their source, can be utilized by 70–80% of bacterial strains [34]. Initially, when Visser [35] introduced this area of study, it was proposed that bacteria might not have easy access to humic compounds. However, further studies conducted by Tranvik and Sieburth [36], Moran and Hodson [37], and Donderski and Wodkowska [38] highlighted the significant role of humic chemicals as nourishment for bacteria. The findings have resulted in diverse studies on the interactions between microorganisms and humic chemicals. Strains of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, and Enterococcus cecorum with humic compounds were investigated, and it was found that these microorganisms were able to reduce humic substances and produce more oxidized products [39]. Notwithstanding, we have not observed over-oxidized products (for example, pyruvic acid from lactic acid, etc.). Nevertheless, laboratory experiments resembling the ones detailed in our study have not yet been performed, and according to our information, no one has investigated the effect of alginite mineral on living cell numbers and biomass.
In summary, based on our living-cell-sensor-supported results and other reports, it is assumed that the presence of humic and fulvic acid compounds and minerals (i.e., inorganic metal ions) in alginite leads to a higher total amount of LAB biomass. In addition to humic substances, alginite also contains other useful components for microbes, such as minerals, amino acids, lipids, polyphenols, and proteins, which the microbes are able to release from the macromolecules of humic and fulvic acid in alginite [39].
To gain information on what type of substances were consumed by the tested LAB strains, we compared initial and final samples of LAB fermentations with and without alginite by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (see Supplementary S1). While these are only preliminary tests, they suggested that the spectra had lower transmittance at wavelengths of 1020, 1410, and 1570 1/cm, indicating more solubility in initial alginite-supplemented fermentations compared to their final samples and alginite-free pairs.
In conclusion, it seems that the strains we are studying may be able to utilize certain sugar components found in alginite. In addition, alginite has organic content between 4.6 and 13%, which may result in a theoretical maximum increase of 1.3 g/L in organic material (10 g/L of alginite having max. 13% organic compounds). Since LAB biomass increased by more than 1.3 g/L in several cases, alginite’s organic content is not enough to reach as high a biomass concentration as we reached with alginite supplementation. Thus, alginite’s effect is rather considered as a source of inorganics (minerals), which resolves media bottleneck compounds, resulting in higher utilization of media protein. LAB convert carbohydrates almost fully into lactic acids and build their own biomass from organic N sources (like amino acids and proteins). Without alginite from MRS (having overall protein content above 25 g/L), only ca. 5 g/L of L. acidophilus NCAIM B.02085, L. rhamnosus NCAIM B02274, and L. lactis NCAIM B02123T was obtained, but with alginite supplementation, 25 g/L of protein was converted into 8, 6.5, and 7.5 g/L of LAB biomass, respectively.
Since studies have shown that alginite and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) together have positive and synergic effects on gastrointestinal function in animal models [13,14,15], our findings on the enhancing effect of alginite may result in more effective probiotic goods with higher living cell numbers. However, whether the fermentation of alginite changes its post-fermentative positive synergic effect or not is the target of further experiments and needs confirmation (Figure 8).
If the pre- and post-fermentation positive synergic effect of alginite is later confirmed, it could lead to the development of a groundbreaking probiotic product. Prior to that time, we can only emphasize that the use of alginite in LAB fermentation has the potential to enhance biomass production yields without drastically altering lactic acid yield. This, in turn, may contribute to meeting the growing demand for lactose-free probiotics [40].
These findings support the future development and production of potentially probiotic non-dairy-based superfoods or dietary supplements. They also add to our research on LAB-based cosmetics combined with alginite minerals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation11080482/s1, S1. NIR spectra for determination of used alginite components by LAB fermentations. Figure S1: NIR spectra of initial and final fermentation samples of L. lactis, L. rhamnosus, B.adolescentis, and L.acidophilus with and without alginite; Figure S2: Model structure of humic acid containing sugar part. References [41,42] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

P.T. methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing original draft; Á.N. conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, validation, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

APC was funded by MÉL Biotech K+F Kft (Budapest, Hungary).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to MEL Biotech K+F Kft (Afo Biotech R&D Ltd., Hungary) for supporting their research with the Hamilton Arc View unit for online cell number monitoring. The authors also express their greatest gratitude to Csaba Fehér at the Biorefinery Research group of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science Department for providing them with a second living cell sensor. The used alginite sample was a kind gift of Alginit Kft, Hungary. The authors have the deepest respect for and are very grateful to Szilveszter Gergely for making the near-infrared measurements possible and giving full support in their evaluation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received funding from MÉL Biotech K+F Kft. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

References

  1. Solti, G. Az Alginit; A Magyar Áll Föld Int (Occasional Publication): Budapest, Hungary, 1987; ISBN 9636710732. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jan, C.; Lukáš, L.; Zdeněk, V.; Martin, B.; Rostislav, L. The effects of alginite fertilisation on selected tree species seedlings performance on afforested agricultural lands. Cent. Eur. For. J. 2017, 63, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tužinský, M.; Kupka, I.; Podrázský, V.; Prknová, H. Influence of the mineral rock alginite on survival rate and re-growth of selected tree species on agricultural land. J. For. Sci. 2015, 61, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Phooi, C.L.; Azman, E.A.; Ismail, R. Do it Yourself: Humic Acid. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2022, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gerke, J. Concepts and misconceptions of humic substances as the stable part of soil organic matter: A review. Agronomy 2018, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kulikova, N.A.; Perminova, I.V. Interactions between Humic Substances and Microorganisms and Their Implications for Nature-like Bioremediation Technologies. Molecules 2021, 26, 2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hudák, M.; Semjon, B.; Marcinčáková, D.; Bujňák, L.; Naď, P.; Koréneková, B.; Nagy, J.; Bartkovský, M.; Marcinčák, S. Effect of broilers chicken diet supplementation with natural and acidified humic substances on quality of produced breast meat. Animals 2021, 11, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Coates, J.; Cole, K.; Chakraborty, R.; O’Connor, S.; Achenbach, L. Diversity and ubiquity of bacteria capable of utilizing humic substances as electron donors for anaerobic respiration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2445–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Terry, S.; Ramos, A.; Holman, D.; McAllister, T.; Breves, G.; Chaves, A. Humic substances alter ammonia production and the microbial populations within a rusitec fed a mixed hay—Concentrate diet. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sheng, P.; Ribeiro, G.; Wang, Y.; McAllister, T. Humic substances reduce ruminal methane production and increase the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 99, 2152–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sebastian, H.; Sangar, S.A.; Peter, F.; Martin, B. Demulsification of water/crude oil emulsion using natural rock alginate. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 553, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sangar, S.A.; Sebastian, H.; Quirina, I.R.-G.; Peter, F.; Martin, B. Alginite rock as effective demulsifier to separate water from various crude oil emulsions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 611, 125830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hlubeňová, K.; Mudroňová, D.; Nemcová, R.; Gancarčíková, S.; Maďar, M.; Sciranková, Ľ. The Effect of Probiotic Lactobacilli and alginite on the Cellular Immune Response in Salmonella Infected Mice. Folia Vet. 2017, 61, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Viola, S.; Ivana, K.; Jana, F.; Aladár, M.; Soňa, G.; Dagmar, M.; Andrea, L. Evaluation of Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum CCM 7421 administration with alginite in Dogs. Probiotics Antimicrob. 2017, 10, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gancarčíková, S.; Nemcová, R.; Popper, M.; Hrčková, G.; Sciranková, Ľ.; Maďar, M.; Mudroňová, D.; Vilček, Š.; Žitňan, R. The Influence of Feed-Supplementation with Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus reuteri CCM 8617 and alginite on Intestinal Microenvironment of SPF Mice Infected with Salmonella typhimurium CCM 7205. Probiotics Antimicrob. Prot. 2018, 11, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chaudhary, P.P.; Kaur, M.; Myles, I.A. Does “all disease begin in the gut”? The gut-organ cross talk in the microbiome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, D.; Lal, M.K.; Dutt, S.; Raigond, P.; Changan, S.S.; Tiwari, R.K.; Chourasia, K.N.; Mangal, V.; Singh, B. Functional fermented probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics from non-dairy products: A perspective from nutraceutical. Mol. Nutr. Amp. Food Res. 2022, 66, e2101059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Natt, S.; Katyal, P. Current trends in non-dairy probiotics and their acceptance among consumers: A review. Agric. Rev. 2021, 43, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aysegul, K.; Ilkin, Y.S. Traditional Non-Dairy Fermented Products: A Candidate for Probiotics. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 40, 1217–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Silanikove, N.; Leitner, G.; Merin, U. The Interrelationships between Lactose Intolerance and the Modern Dairy Industry: Global Perspectives in Evolutional and Historical Backgrounds. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7312–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Panghal, A.; Janghu, S.; Virkar, K.; Gat, Y.; Kumar, V.; Chhikara, N. Potential non-dairy probiotic products—A healthy approach. Food Biosci. 2018, 21, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martin, M.; Lara-Villoslada, F.; Ruiz, M.; Morales, M. Effect of unmodified starch on viability of alginate-encapsulated Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716. LWT 2013, 53, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petrova, P.; Petrov, K. Lactic Acid Fermentation of Cereals and Pseudocereals: Ancient Nutritional Biotechnologies with Modern Applications. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lasta, E.L.; da Silva Pereira Ronning, E.; Dekker, R.F.H.; da Cunha, M.A.A. Encapsulation and dispersion of Lactobacillus acidophilus in a chocolate coating as a strategy for maintaining cell viability in cereal bars. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, F.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Kwok, L.; Shen, L.; Jin, H.; Sun, T.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, H. Gut Bifidobacterium responses to probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang administration vary between subjects from different geographic regions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 2665–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kádár, I.; Ragályi, P.; Murányi, A.; Radinszky, L.; Gajdó, A. Effect of Gérce alginit on the fertility of an acid sandy soil. Agrokémia és Talajt. 2015, 64, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tóth, P.; Németh, Á. Investigations Into the usage of the mineral alginite fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei for cosmetic purposes. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 2022, 50, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tóth, P.; Németh, Á. Investigation and Characterisation of New Eco-Friendly Cosmetic Ingredients Based on Probiotic Bacteria Ferment Filtrates in Combination with Alginite Mineral. Processes 2022, 10, 2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. George, B.; Seals, S.; Aban, I. Survival analysis and regression models. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kiss, B.; Németh, A. Application of a High Cell Density Capacitance Sensor to Different Microorganisms. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2016, 60, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Incyte Sensor Manufacturer’s Webpage. Available online: https://www.hamiltoncompany.com/process-analytics/sensors/cell-density-sensors/viable-cell-density-sensors/incyte-arc (accessed on 4 June 2025).
  32. Barančíková, G.; Litavec, T. Comparison of Chemical Structure of Alginite Humic Acids Isolated with Two Different Procedures with Soil Humic Acids. Agriculture 2016, 62, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lubica, P.; Markéta, K.; Ondřej, Z.; René, K.; Gabriela, B.; Tadeáš, L.; Tomáš, L.; Jaroslav, H.; Anna, M.; Tibor, L. Fate of humic acids isolated from natural humic substances. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2015, 65, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Donderski, W.; Burkowska, A. Metabolic Activity of Heterotrophic Bacteria in the Presence of Humic Substances and Their Fractions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2000, 9, 267–271. [Google Scholar]
  35. Visser, S.A. Effect of humic acids of number and activities of microorganisms within physiological groups. Org. Geochem. 1984, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Travnik, L.J.; Sieburth, J. Effect of flocculated humic matter on free and attached pelagic microorganisms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1989, 34, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moran, M.A.; Hodson, R.E. Bacterial production on humic and nonhumic components of dissolved organic carbon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1990, 35, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Donderski, W.; Wodkowska, A. Humic substances as a source of carbon and nitrogen for heterotrophic bacteria isolated from lakes of different trophy. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 1997, 6, 9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Benz, M.; Schink, B.; Brune, A. Humic Acid Reduction by Propionibacterium freudenreichii and Other Fermenting Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4507–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dahiya, D.; Nigam, P.S. Therapeutic and Dietary Support for Gastrointestinal Tract Using Kefir as a Nutraceutical Beverage: Dairy-Milk-Based or Plant-Sourced Kefir Probiotic Products for Vegan and Lactose-Intolerant Populations. Fermentation 2023, 9, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Helal, A.A.; Murad, G.A.; Helal, A.A. Characterization of different humic materials by various analytical techniques. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; John, Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994; ISBN 0-471-59474-1. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Dry matter of residue of alginite in 100 g/L lactic acid solution; (b) dry matter of alginite residue in different concentrations of lactic acid.
Figure 1. (a) Dry matter of residue of alginite in 100 g/L lactic acid solution; (b) dry matter of alginite residue in different concentrations of lactic acid.
Fermentation 11 00482 g001
Figure 2. Relative impedance diagram of static fermentations ((a) Lactococcus lactis NCAIM B.02123T; (b) Lactocaseibacillus rhamnosus B.02274T; (c) Lactobacillus acidophilus NCAIM B.02085). All strains were tested in triplicates.
Figure 2. Relative impedance diagram of static fermentations ((a) Lactococcus lactis NCAIM B.02123T; (b) Lactocaseibacillus rhamnosus B.02274T; (c) Lactobacillus acidophilus NCAIM B.02085). All strains were tested in triplicates.
Fermentation 11 00482 g002
Figure 3. µmax values of fermentations in BacTrac. R2 represents the goodness of the curve fitting.
Figure 3. µmax values of fermentations in BacTrac. R2 represents the goodness of the curve fitting.
Fermentation 11 00482 g003
Figure 4. Dry matter of static fermentations in BacTrac.
Figure 4. Dry matter of static fermentations in BacTrac.
Fermentation 11 00482 g004
Figure 5. Time course of LAB fermentation with and without alginite in a 1 L bioreactor—Fermentation 11 00482 i001 glucose (with L. lactis lactose), Fermentation 11 00482 i002 lactic acid, Fermentation 11 00482 i003 CFU/mL.
Figure 5. Time course of LAB fermentation with and without alginite in a 1 L bioreactor—Fermentation 11 00482 i001 glucose (with L. lactis lactose), Fermentation 11 00482 i002 lactic acid, Fermentation 11 00482 i003 CFU/mL.
Fermentation 11 00482 g005aFermentation 11 00482 g005b
Figure 6. Online cell density sensor’s permittivity results in a 1 L bioreactor. (a) L. lactis NCAIM B.02123T; (b) L. rhamnosus NCAIM B.02274T; (c) L. acidophilus NCAIM B.02085. Each data pair is significantly different (p < 0.05). Here, “with alginite” refers to addition of 10 g/L of alginite.
Figure 6. Online cell density sensor’s permittivity results in a 1 L bioreactor. (a) L. lactis NCAIM B.02123T; (b) L. rhamnosus NCAIM B.02274T; (c) L. acidophilus NCAIM B.02085. Each data pair is significantly different (p < 0.05). Here, “with alginite” refers to addition of 10 g/L of alginite.
Fermentation 11 00482 g006
Figure 7. Dry matter of the dynamic cultures in 1 L bioreactors with and without alginite.
Figure 7. Dry matter of the dynamic cultures in 1 L bioreactors with and without alginite.
Fermentation 11 00482 g007
Figure 8. Different manufacturing processes for alginite-based probiotic supplement. (a) Post-fermentation administration of alginite to LAB preparatum; (b) pre-fermentation administration of alginite to LAB strains.
Figure 8. Different manufacturing processes for alginite-based probiotic supplement. (a) Post-fermentation administration of alginite to LAB preparatum; (b) pre-fermentation administration of alginite to LAB strains.
Fermentation 11 00482 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tóth, P.; Németh, Á. Exploring the Impact of Alginite Mineral on Lactic Acid Bacteria. Fermentation 2025, 11, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11080482

AMA Style

Tóth P, Németh Á. Exploring the Impact of Alginite Mineral on Lactic Acid Bacteria. Fermentation. 2025; 11(8):482. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11080482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tóth, Pál, and Áron Németh. 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Alginite Mineral on Lactic Acid Bacteria" Fermentation 11, no. 8: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11080482

APA Style

Tóth, P., & Németh, Á. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Alginite Mineral on Lactic Acid Bacteria. Fermentation, 11(8), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11080482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop