Next Article in Journal
Unlocking the Potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 73 as a Ripening Agent in Semi-Hard Cheese After Freeze-Drying and a Six-Month Storage Period
Previous Article in Journal
Assisted Isolation of Camelliagenin B from Camellia oliefera Seed Cake Meal and Microbial Transformation by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Bacillus megaterium CGMCC 1.1741, and Streptomyces gresius ATCC 13273
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing Xylanase Production: Bridging Statistical Design and Machine Learning for Improved Protein Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Fermentation Processes: Modeling, Optimization and Control: 2nd Edition

by
Ricardo Aguilar López
Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, México City 07360, Mexico
Fermentation 2025, 11(7), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070408
Submission received: 24 June 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 10 July 2025 / Published: 16 July 2025
Fermentation is an important cornerstone of bioengineering, which plays a critical role in the production of a wide array of products including pharmaceuticals, biofuels, food additives, industrial chemicals and enzymes. As a biological process that involves the metabolic activity of microorganisms, fermentation is inherently complex, nonlinear, and dynamic. This complexity poses significant challenges to researchers and engineers who aim to optimize product yield and quality, and enhance process efficiency.
To address these challenges, significant attention has been devoted to the development of robust strategies for modeling, monitoring, and controlling fermentation processes. Accurate modeling provides a foundation for understanding the underlying biological and physicochemical phenomena that enable simulation, prediction, and process design in the fermentative production of target products. Meanwhile, real-time monitoring is essential for tracking key process variables such as biomass concentration, substrate consumption, and product formation, thereby offering insight into the state of the system. Lastly, advanced control techniques ensure that the process operates within optimal conditions, despite disturbances and uncertainties, to maximize productivity and ensure regulatory compliance.
The integration of these elements is vital for the transition from empirical, trial-and-error methods to data-driven and model-based approaches in modern bioprocessing. The synergy between these technologies, such as modern measurement devices, new algorithms for optimization and process control, and computational hardware, has profound implications for sustainability issues. Traditional fermentation processes can be resource-intensive, often requiring significant inputs of water, energy, and raw materials. Through AI-enhanced optimization, waste can be minimized, energy efficiency can be achieved, and the overall environmental impact can be significantly reduced. These initiatives not only improve productivity but also help forge pathways to a more sustainable industrial future.
Under this framework, this Special Issue features several contributions that are focused on novel tools applied to fermentative processes, such as machine learning for improved protein production, heuristic and theoretical optimization procedures based on control strategies, improved culture media or the use of nonconventional microorganisms and bioreactor designs and configurations to maximize specific bioproducts like organic acids, as well as online strategies for the estimation of key operational variables in fermentation (Contributions 1–10).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions:

  • Ergün, M.A.; Köktürk-Güzel, B.E.; Keskin-Gündoğdu, T. Optimizing Xylanase Production: Bridging Statistical Design and Machine Learning for Improved Protein Production. Fermentation 2025, 11, 319, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060319.
  • Gutiérrez, E.; Noriega, M.; Fernández, C.; Pantano, N.; Rodriguez, L.; Scaglia, G. Dynamic Optimization of Xylitol Production Using Legendre-Based Control Parameterization. Fermentation 2025, 11, 308, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060308.
  • Pedone, I.S.; Aquino, F.I.; Costa, E.d.S.M.; Macagnan, K.L.; Porto, J.d.R.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Alves, M.I.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Moreira, A.d.S. Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I. Fermentation 2025, 11, 191, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191.
  • Prathumpai, W.; Pinruan, U.; Sommai, S.; Komwijit, S.; Malairuang, K. Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Production by Endophytic and Basidiomycete Fungi. Fermentation 2025, 11, 183, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040183.
  • Ma, T.; Xin, Y.; Chen, X.; Wen, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; Li, X.; You, M.; Yan, Y. Effects of Compound Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Quality of Oat and Common Vetch Silage in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Fermentation 2025, 11, 93, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11020093.
  • Yaderets, V.V.; Karpova, N.V.; Glagoleva, E.V.; Shibaeva, A.S.; Dzhavakhiya, V.V. The Optimization of the Nutrient Medium Composition for the Submerged Cultivation of the Mycolicibacterium neoaurum Strain VKM Ac-3067D in a 100 L Bioreactor Under Controlled Conditions by Mathematical Planning. Fermentation 2025, 11, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11020082.
  • Moser, A.; Appl, C.; Pörtner, R.; Baganz, F.; Hass, V.C. A New Concept for the Rapid Development of Digital Twin Core Models for Bioprocesses in Various Reactor Designs. Fermentation 2024, 10, 463, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090463.
  • Long, L.; Ren, X.; Zhang, F.; Shi, A.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, W.; Duan, Y.; Shi, P.; Chen, L.; Li, D. Enhanced Fermentation Process for Production of High Docosahexaenoic Acid Content by Schizochytrium sp. GCD2032. Fermentation 2024, 10, 460, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090460.
  • Sayın, B.; Bozkurt, A.G.; Kaban, G. Assessing Waste Sunflower Oil as a Substrate for Citric Acid Production: The Inhibitory Effect of Triton X-100. Fermentation 2024, 10, 374, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070374.
  • Wei, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, P.; Qi, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, Z. Online Monitoring of the Temperature and Relative Humidity of Recycled Bedding for Dairy Cows on Dairy Farms. Fermentation 2024, 10, 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10070346.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López, R.A. Fermentation Processes: Modeling, Optimization and Control: 2nd Edition. Fermentation 2025, 11, 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070408

AMA Style

López RA. Fermentation Processes: Modeling, Optimization and Control: 2nd Edition. Fermentation. 2025; 11(7):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070408

Chicago/Turabian Style

López, Ricardo Aguilar. 2025. "Fermentation Processes: Modeling, Optimization and Control: 2nd Edition" Fermentation 11, no. 7: 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070408

APA Style

López, R. A. (2025). Fermentation Processes: Modeling, Optimization and Control: 2nd Edition. Fermentation, 11(7), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11070408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop