Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Silage Efficiency: The Role of Ryegrass Varieties, Harvest Time, and Additives in Enhancing Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical and Biological Activities of Meads from Five Mekong Region Honeys Pre- and Post-Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Production by Endophytic and Basidiomycete Fungi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I

by
Isabel Santos Pedone
1,
Fabíola Insaurriaga Aquino
1,
Eduardo dos Santos Macedo Costa
2,
Karine Laste Macagnan
2,
Jéssica da Rosa Porto
3,
Anderson Schwingel Ribeiro
3,
Mariane Igansi Alves
1,
Claire Tondo Vendruscolo
4 and
Angelita da Silveira Moreira
1,2,*
1
Department of Agroindustrial Science and Technology, Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96010-900, Brazil
2
Technological Development Center, Biotechnology Center, Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96010-900, Brazil
3
Program in Chemistry, Chemical Metrology Laboratory (LabMeQui), Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96010-900, Brazil
4
Biopolix Tecnological Materials, Ribeirão Preto 14056-680, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(4), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191
Submission received: 12 March 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 1 April 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025

Abstract

:
Xanthan is a highly relevant commercial microbial biopolymer. Its production occurs in two steps: the bacterium is cultivated in a nitrogen-rich medium for cell multiplication, and the obtained biomass is used as an inoculum for the polymer production phase. Different media compositions for cell growth were investigated, seeking to reduce or replace the peptone used in the standard medium. Peptone (P), yeast extract (YE), and rice parboiling water (RPW) concentration combinations were tested in cultivating Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni 101. A CRD 23 design, performed in a shaker, was used to assess the effects of independent variables on xanthan pruni microbial growth, N consumption, yield, viscosity, pseudoplasticity, and xanthan mineral content. After 24 h an increase in N was observed, without any significant impact on cell growth. Xanthan yield increased as a result of the alternative treatments, with P and YE influencing positively. However, T1, with the lowest levels of P, YE, and RPW increased viscosity and pseudoplasticity of xanthan pruni. RPW increased phosphorus, silicon, calcium, and magnesium, and P and YE increased potassium. These results indicate that partial replacement of P by RPW and YE is an economically viable and sustainable approach for the xanthan pruni production.

1. Introduction

The properties of natural polymers such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and renewability are attracting growing attention to these products. Among these polymers, xanthan, an extracellular biopolymer produced by bacteria of the Xanthomonas gender is highlighted. Due to its rheological and structural properties, xanthan is widely employed in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, paintings, and petroleum industries [1]. The global demand for this product is registering constant growth. According to Global Market Insights, the xanthan gum market could reach USD 1.2b by 2030, at a composite annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.71%. Brazil also exhibits impressive consumption, attaining 30 thousand tons a year, supplied exclusively by international industries [2,3].
For the Xanthomonas cultivation and production, carbon sources are used as substrates, while sources of nitrogen and minerals are employed as nutrients [4]. The high costs associated with substrates constitute a process limitation. To minimize such costs, agro-industrial wastes are being studied as alternative substrate sources, such as water obtained from oil production [5], pineapple wastes [6], rice hulls [7], rice hulls [8], beet molasses [9], bread wastes [10], orange peels [11], and wine industry waste [12]. The development of sustainable, low-cost solutions for obtaining xanthan can significantly increase market opportunities [6].
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most consumed staple foods, parboiled rice being one of its most consumed forms in Brazil. The rice parboiling process involves a hydrothermal treatment in which the hulled grain is immersed in drinking water to soak at temperatures above 58 °C, followed by partial or total gelatinization and further drying [13]. In the rice parboiling process, the grain’s outer mineral layers, especially in the bran and aleurone layer, migrate towards the interior of the grain, and a portion of these RPW minerals are primarily determined by process parameters temperature, time, and operating conditions [14]. At the end of the process, the wastewater generated, containing high phosphorus and nitrogen, causes high biochemical oxygen demand, requiring suitable treatment before disposal. The composition of this nutrient-rich water represents a significant challenge for the rice industries, especially in view of the complexity of phosphorus and nitrogen management, which can cause environmental harm if not duly mitigated [15,16].
Until now, no strategies have been identified aiming at redirecting RPW waste to other industries, adding value to another product. RPW study was pioneered by our research group in the X. arboricola pv. pruni (ex X. campestris pv. pruni) production phase for obtaining xanthan, directly influencing the characteristics of the obtained gum [17]. Besides minimizing the environmental impacts, the use of this waste as substrate could contribute to xanthan cost reduction, making viable domestic production. Investment in xanthan domestic production brings economic benefits, such as a reduction in dependence on imports and job creation, in addition to promoting environmental sustainability by reducing impact through the use of industrial effluents as substrate [4]. Therefore, the scientific and technological advancement in xanthan production in Brazil is crucial for the development of this industry in our country, rendering it competitive in the global biopolymers market.
Xanthan pruni, a polymer analogous to xanthan and produced by X. arboricola pv. pruni, differs from commercial xanthan in its chemical composition. Studies have demonstrated that xanthan pruni contains rhamnose in its structure, likely incorporated in the side chains, which distinguishes it from conventional xanthan [18]. Studies on X. arboricola pv. pruni remain limited, and there is a lack of information regarding the impact of various alternative media on the production of xanthan pruni. Perez et al. (2020) [19] evaluated the supplementation of the medium with yeast extracts and observed a significant increase in biopolymer production. In the study by Moreira (2023) [20], culture media containing different minerals were used to produce xanthan pruni. Among the components, the use of RPW stood out, as well as carbon sources such as sucrose and cellulose, and nitrogen sources such as peptone and mineral salts. Given the scarcity of studies addressing different medium formulations to produce xanthan pruni, this work aims to contribute to the advancement of this topic by evaluating the feasibility of using alternative nutrient sources and their impacts on the production and characteristics of the biopolymer.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of rice parboiling water (RPW) use combined with peptone and yeast extract as N sources in culture media for Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni cell growth (the 101 strain being used as a model) and the production of its biopolymer, referred to in this study as xanthan pruni. The viability of these alternative media was examined by comparing cell growth, xanthan pruni yield, and its rheological properties with those obtained from conventional culture media. Besides, the main compounds present in parboiling water were identified to check if they influence xanthan synthesis. This is meant to contribute to the development of more sustainable, economically viable processes, by exploring alternative sources of substrates and assessing the effectiveness of different culture media components.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rice Parboiling Wastewater Characterization

RPW was collected from the Nelson Wendt company in Pelotas, RS, Brazil, from the outlet tube during the discharge process into the effluent collection tank. The rice immersed in the tanks was a varietal mixture (2022 harvest). After collection, RPW samples were stored in plastic bottles and frozen at −18 °C for further characterization and utilization. The pH value [21], reducing sugars [22], and nitrogen content (Urea kit CE ref. 27—Labtest®, Delta, BC, Canada) were determined. Mineral characterization was performed with the aid of a MIP OES (Agilent Technologies, model Agilent 4200, Melbourne, Australia) spectrometer [23] (Table 1).

2.2. Inoculum Preparation

The X. arboricola pv. pruni 101 bacterium was kept in agar SPA [24] and cultivated in a liquid medium with different peptone (Himedia®, Kennett Square, PA, USA) concentrations, yeast extract (Procelys by Lesaffre®, Marcq-en-Barœul, France), and RPW, according to a central composite design 23 [24]. Factors were codified in three levels: low (−1), medium (0), and high (+1), with the central point representing the repetitions [25] (Table 2).
All the treatments were diluted in a solution of (g/L): 20 sucrose, 0.5 dibasic potassium phosphate, and 0.25 heptahydrate magnesium sulfate (Synth®, Diadema, Brazil). SPA standard medium [24] was utilized as a positive control, the composition of which is in (g/L): 5 of peptone, added to the previous solution. Cultivation was conducted in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 40 mL of cultivation medium and 10 mL of bacterium suspension (9.14 UFC/mL), in SPA medium, incubated at 28 °C, 150 rpm for 24 h in an orbital shaker (B. Braun Biotech, Certomat BS-1, Melsungen, Germany). Initial and final bacterial concentrations were assessed by means of serial dilutions and plating in agar SPA medium, the colonies counting being expressed in UFC/mL.

2.3. Xanthan Pruni Production

The bioprocess occurred in 250 mL Erlenmeyers flasks containing 45 mL of MPII production medium [17] and 5 mL inoculum (Section 2.2) in an orbital shaker (B. Braun Biotech, Certomat BS-1, Melsungen, Germany) at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 72 h. Biopolymer recovery was performed with ethyl alcohol 96° GL (4:1 v/v), followed by oven-drying (CE-220-81, Cielenlab, Campinas, Brazil) at 56 °C to constant weight. The yield was determined by gravimetry and expressed in g/L.

2.4. Nitrogen

Residual nitrogen content (mg/L) was quantified in two steps with the aid of the Urea Kit CE (Labtest®, Richmond, BC, Canada, ref. 27). Broth samples were collected at the 0 and 24 h times, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm x for 10 min at 4 °C in a refrigerated centrifuge (Electron Corporation®, Sorvall-Thermo, EUA, Tokyo, Japan). The supernatant was analyzed in a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-1900i, Kyoto, Japan) at 500 nm. Nitrogen content calculation followed the standard method (urea 70 mg/L and sodium azide 7.7 mmol/L), according to Equation (1):
Residual   Nitrogen   ( m g / L ) = A b s o r b a n c e   o f   S a m p l e     A b s o r b a n c e   o f   S t a n d a r d   × 70 × 10

2.5. Viscosity

Rheological properties of xanthan aqueous solutions were assessed with the aid of a rheometer (RheoStress 600, model RS150, Haake®, Vreden, Germany). 1% (m/v) Xanthan aqueous solutions were prepared, agitated for 2 h, and stored at 4 °C for 24 h. Rheometric analysis was performed at 25 °C, with a cone and plate geometry (C60/2° Ti sensor; 0.105 mm interval).

2.6. Minerals

Mineral analysis was performed according to the method described by Rosa et al. (2016) [26]. At first, xanthan gum samples were treated by acidic digestion with the aid of an open system in a digesting block. Approximately 100 mg of the samples were weighed and transferred to glass digesting tubes, to which 5 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO₃) was added. The mixture was heated in a digester at 220 °C under reflux for 3 h. The resulting solutions were diluted in ultrapure water and analyzed in triplicate with the aid of a microwave-induced plasma optical emission spectrometer (MIP OES) (Agilent Technologies, model Agilent 4200, Mulgrave, Australia).

2.7. Statistics

Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results were expressed in averages and standard deviations. A t-test was performed to observe significance at the p ≤ 0.05 level using RStudio software (2023.06.2+524). The effects of independent variables were determined using ANOVA with Statistica 10.0® software, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cell Growth

X. arboricola pv. pruni cell concentration in the examined alternative cell growth media and in standard SPA medium is listed in Table 3. In spite of the fact that the results show significant variations statistically in cell growth among the treatments and the SPA medium as seen by the t-test, the differences are relatively small. The SPA medium led to a 10.04 UFC/mL cell concentration, while in the remaining treatments, the concentration varied between 9.69 and 9.98 UFC/mL.
Treatment 6, with 80% (v/v) RPW, led to a slightly lower result (9.69 ± 0.01 UFC/mL) as compared to treatments containing 20% (v/v) RPW (9.87 to 9.98 ± 0.04 UFC/mL). The results illustrated in Figure 1 evidence this trend. The negative signal of the RPW coefficient means that cell growth increased with a reduction in the mentioned parameter value, which may be associated with inhibitory compounds or high mineral levels in the water, especially silicon [14]. This phenomenon suggests that increased RPW concentration can have an inhibitory effect on X. arboricola pv. pruni growth.

3.2. Yield

Xanthan yield varied among treatments, with values between 7.0 and 8.9 g/L, while the standard SPA medium exhibited a yield of 6.8 g/L (Table 4). Exception made to treatment 5, all the remaining treatments resulted in significantly higher yields than those of the SPA standard medium. From a comparison among cell growth results, it can be seen that in this case, the cell concentration in the examined range was not a determining factor for yield. This suggests that although the SPA medium results in higher bacterial growth (Table 3), other factors related to medium composition, such as Fe, Zn, and Mn micromineral concentrations, could play an important role in yield increase.
The nitrogen source plays an essential role in the growth and production of xanthans by bacteria of the Xanthomonas gender [27]. According to the Pareto plot for xanthan yield (Figure 2), peptone was the most influential independent variable in the observed response, followed by yeast extract and RPW, in addition to the isolated RPW effect and the peptone–RPW combination. These results point out that peptone and yeast extract, when used by themselves, are able to provide good yields. However, RPW supplementation can render the cultivation medium still more efficient.
Previous studies already demonstrated the importance of organic nitrogen sources in xanthan production. Kurbanolgu and Kurbanolgu (2007) and Caegnatto et al. (2011) [28,29] highlighted that peptone and yeast extract provide soluble amino acids and minerals essential to the cultivation medium, creating favorable conditions for biopolymer synthesis. Ozdal and Kurbanolgu (2019) [9] reported a significant increase in xanthan production by using peptones extracted from hens’ feathers, reaching yields in excess of 24 g/L in a shaker at 200 rpm.
In spite of the positive impact of yeast extract, yields observed (4.02 to 4.18 g/L) were lower than those obtained in this study, suggesting that yeast extract per se may be not as efficient as when combined with other components, such as peptone and RPW. Da Silva et al. (2018) [30] also utilized agro-industrial wastes such as coconut and cocoa peel, reaching values of 3.89 to 4.48 g/L. In the present study, the use of RPW as an alternative source provided yields higher than those reported in these papers, indicating that this agro-industrial waste can be a viable alternative for optimizing xanthan production.
Demirci et al. (2019) [10] obtained a superior yield (14.3 g/L) by utilizing disposed bread waste; however, the hypothesis of an inflated yield cannot be discarded in view of the presence of starch. Trivunović et al. (2024) [12] reached yields between 4 and 10 g/L by utilizing rosé wine wastewater. Yield variations can be explained by differences in substrate composition and adopted fermentation conditions. Similar yields obtained from treatments tested in this study reinforce the viability of partial replacement of conventional medium components for RPW, peptone, and yeast extract, without compromising xanthan productivity. This finding is relevant for process scalability since it enables using agro-industrial wastes as sustainable, economically viable alternatives while maintaining a competitive performance as compared with conventional substrates.

3.3. Residual Nitrogen

Nitrogen contents measured in initial time (0 h) varied between 4.52 and 12.21 mg/dL, suggesting that culture medium composition was directly influenced by peptone, yield extract, and RPW concentrations (Table 5).
After 24 h, a significant increase in nitrogen concentrations was observed, reaching values between 102.8 and 449.9 mg/L. This behavior was consistent for all treatments, with the highest increases being observed for those containing higher peptone and yeast extract concentrations. For example, for treatment 4 (+1 peptone and +1 yeast extract), nitrogen concentration increased from 9.44 to 44.99 mg/dL, while for treatment 8 (having the same peptone and yeast extract, but higher RPW percentage), the increase was from 12.21 to 43.99 mg/dL. Such an increase after 24 h cultivation was also observed by Macagnan et al. (2021) [31] when studying the influence of different yeast extracts on X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 cell growth.
The cause of nitrogen increase was not completely revealed, but it is suggested that the X. arboricola bacterium can be involved in a process of atmospheric nitrogen fixation [32]. Alternatively, gradual nitrogen release from the degradation of compounds present in peptone and in yeast extract may have contributed to the observed increase. Further studies are required to confirm possible nitrogen fixation and identify the mechanisms at the origin of this phenomenon.
As regards the effects of independent variables, peptone exhibited a positive relationship with initial nitrogen content (Figure 3). At higher concentration (+1, corresponding to 5 g/L), nitrogen contents were significantly higher, as could be observed from treatments 4 (9.44 mg/dL) and 8 (12.21 mg/dL), nitrogen values at 0 h were consistently higher, as in treatments 3 (8.13 mg/dL) and 7 (8.21 mg/dL).

3.4. Viscosity

The rheological properties of xanthan were described by the Ostwald–de Waele model using K and ɳ parameters, with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.99 (Table 6). The consistency index (K), which translates the resistance to fluid flow, varied from 4.874 to 0.205 for treatments 1 and 4, respectively. The flow behavior index ) varied from 0.605 and 0.181, indicating the relationship between shear rate and viscosity. A value of ) below 1 (ɳ < 1) confirms the pseudoplastic behavior [1].
Treatments obtained from different RPW, peptone, and yeast extract concentrations enabled us to obtain xanthan products having different properties. For treatment 1, with the lower peptone concentrations, yeast extract, and RPW, the consistency index (K) was the highest, 4.874, pointing to high viscosity, while the flow behavior index (ɳ) was the lowest, 0.181, featuring a more accentuated pseudoplastic behavior. High viscosity provides better water retention capacity, which contributes to higher stability and improvement in food texture for the food industry. On the other hand, for treatment 4, with high peptone (5 g/L) and yeast extract (5 g/L) concentrations, the consistency index (K) was the lowest, at only 0.205, and the flow behavior index (ɳ) was the highest, 0.605.
Comparatively, Cancella et al. (2024) [1] investigated xanthan production from milk substrates, such as milk permeate and deproteinized whey in a shaker. The consistency index (K) of the obtained xanthan products was 1.829 and 0.874, respectively, which were lower than those obtained from rice parboiling water. Crugeira et al. (2023) [33] also assessed xanthan biosynthesis using wet olives bagasse, with 15% and 20% concentrations, resulting in consistency indices (K) of 4.353 and 4.216. Besides, flow behavior (ɳ) indices were 0.2939 for 15% concentration and 0.2534 for 20%. Trivunović et al. (2024) [12] made use of vineyard wastewater and obtained viscosity values between 40 and 60 mPa.
These values are lower than those found in the present study signaling that RPW can be a highly efficient substrate for obtaining high-viscosity xanthan products. It is important to consider that cultivation medium composition, Xanthomonas strain employed, and production conditions, such as temperature, time, pH, agitation, and aeration, can significantly influence polymer structure and consequently the rheological properties of the produced gum [34]. Based on the results of Figure 4, it can be observed that the response value is mainly influenced by peptone and yeast extract concentration, with negative effects of 4.49 and 4.35, respectively, at a 5% significance level. This means that the higher the contents of these components, the lower the gum viscosity at the tested concentration range. This is desirable since it involves input savings.
In Figure 5, it is possible to observe the independent variables’ effect on the flow behavior index (ɳ). Yeast extract was the highest positive impact factor on this parameter, with a standardized effect of 6.66, followed by peptone with an effect of 5.36. This means that both components, at higher concentrations, in the range examined, significantly increase the value of (ɳ), which means lower pseudoplasticity.

3.5. Minerals

The xanthan gum mineral composition varied among the treatments, influenced by the medium components. As expected, high RPW, peptone, and yeast extract concentration treatments favored the incorporation of minerals into the biopolymer. P was the element that most differed from the value ascertained for xanthan pruni synthesized in the standard medium—SPA. P, Si, Ca, and Mn exhibited higher concentration in high-RPW treatments. K was more influenced by peptone concentration and yeast extract. Na, Zn, Mg, and Mn were kept relatively stable.
Other elements, besides those listed in the Table 7, were also analyzed. Ti, B, and Al were found only as trace elements. Analyzes for Cd, Ba, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cr, and As were performed, but these elements were not detected in the obtained xanthan. According to the monography provided by the FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives [35], xanthan should not contain more than 2 mg/Kg lead in its general form, with the limit reduced to 0.5 mg·kg−1 for infant formulae. Besides, the Food Chemicals Codex [36] monography sets a limit of 3 mg/Kg for As in xanthan gum. However, the results of the present research pointed out that xanthan pruni did not exhibit any detectable lead or arsenic concentration, thus it meets the safety standards required for human consumption.
Xanthan gums exhibited variable concentrations of monovalent salts, between 2.44% and 2.93%. Torres et al. (1993) [37] observed 4.97% monovalent salts in xanthan gums produced by X. Campestris. Similarly, Borges (2007) [38] reported 5% monovalent salts for X. arboricola pv. pruni 115 strain, while commercial xanthan gums showed monovalent salts content variation from 0.67% to 3.2%. It should be mentioned that the total cation concentration is directly related to the negative hydroxyl, pyruvyl, and acetyl groups/ions [39].
The relationship among ions is crucial for understanding xanthan’s functional properties. Among monovalent salts, Na’s contribution to viscosity increase is higher than that of K. Moreover, the replacement of K with Na through ionic exchange [40] constitutes a strategy to increase xanthan viscosity. Treatment 1, with lower K content, had the highest viscosity (K 4.874) as compared with both the remaining treatments and the standard. In spite of the fact that monovalent salts contribute to viscosity increase, generally, these are not responsible for forming strong gels due to their weaker interactions as compared with divalent and trivalent salts [41].

4. Conclusions

In the face of growing environmental challenges caused by increasing agro-industrial wastes, the use of RPW for producing biopolymers like xanthan is a sustainable, economically viable alternative. The partial (80%) replacement of peptone for rice parboiling water and yeast extract increased xanthan pruni yield and improved its rheological properties, increasing viscosity and pseudoplasticity. Besides, RPW fostered higher incorporation of minerals such as phosphorus, silicon, calcium, and magnesium. Potassium directly depended on P and YE concentration. Toxic elements such as arsenic and lead were not detected in the obtained xanthan. These findings evidence the potential of agro-industrial wastes as efficient alternatives for sustainable biopolymer production. Besides, obtained data provides important subsidies for bioprocess optimization, focusing on yield increment and end product quality. Aiming at scalability, complementary studies are being carried out in agitated flasks and bioreactors to assess the effect of RPW addition to the xanthan pruni production medium, which will contribute to future industrial production in line with sustainable development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.S.P. and A.d.S.M.; methodology, I.S.P., F.I.A., E.d.S.M.C. and J.d.R.P.; software, I.S.P. and K.L.M.; validation, I.S.P., K.L.M. and A.S.R.; formal analysis, I.S.P.; investigation, I.S.P. and A.d.S.M.; data curation, K.L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S.P., K.L.M. and M.I.A.; writing—review and editing, I.S.P. and A.d.S.M.; visualization, C.T.V.; supervision, A.d.S.M.; project administration, A.d.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the CAPES and CNPq funding agencies for their financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Claire Tondo Vendruscolo is co-owner by the Biopolix Tecnological Materials. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RPWrice parboiling water

References

  1. Cancella, M.J.; Cerqueira, A.F.L.W.; da Costa Teodoro, L.; Pereira, J.R.; da Costa Ludwig, Z.M.; de Carvalho Anjos, V.; Rodarte, M.P. Xanthan gum produced from milk permeate and deproteinized cheese whey: A comparative analysis with commercial xanthan gums. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 56, 103053. [Google Scholar]
  2. Global Market Insights. Xanthan Gum Market Size, Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Growth Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast. 2024. Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/xanthan-gum-market (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  3. Mordor Intelligence. Xanthan Gum Market Size & Share Analysis—Growth Trends & Forecasts (2025–2030). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/xanthan-gum-market (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  4. Li, P.; Li, T.; Zeng, Y.; Li, X.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, T.; Zhang, Y. Biosynthesis of xanthan gum by Xanthomonas campestris LRELP-1 using kitchen waste as the sole substrate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Ramos, B.F.M.; de Almeida, P.F.; Chinalia, F.A. Bacterial xanthan and ramnolipid simultaneous production using industrial oil produced water. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 983–990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rashidi, A.R.; Dailin, D.J.; Ramli, S.; Hanapi, S.Z.; Ibrahim, S.F.; El Enshasy, H. Variable nitrogen sources effect on Xanthomonas campestris ATCC 13915 ability for xanthan production in culture supplemented with pineapple waste. Biosci. Res. 2023, 20, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vidhyalakshmi, R.; Vallinachiyar, C.; Radhika, R. Production of xanthan from agro-industrial waste. J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2012, 3, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  8. Obidah, J.S.; Owuama, C.I. Xanthan yield and conversion efficiency of pre-treated rice husk, sweet potato and cassava flours from Xanthomonas campestris fermentation. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 2017, 49, 477–481. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ozdal, M.; Kurbanoglu, E.B. Citric acid production by Aspergillus niger from agro-industrial by-products: Molasses and chicken feather peptone. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 631–640. [Google Scholar]
  10. Demirci, A.S.; Palabiyik, I.; Apaydın, D.; Mirik, M.; Gumus, T. Xanthan gum biosynthesis using Xanthomonas isolates from waste bread: Process optimization and fermentation kinetics. LWT 2019, 101, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohsin, A.; Zhang, K.; Hu, J.; Rehman, S.U.; Tariq, M.; Zaman, W.Q.; Khan, I.M.; Zhuang, Y.; Guo, M. Optimized biosynthesis of xanthan via effective valorization of orange peels using response surface methodology: A kinetic model approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 793–800. [Google Scholar]
  12. Trivunović, Z.; Zahović, I.; Vlajkov, V.; Grahovac, M.; Grahovac, J.; Dodić, J. Xanthan production using wastewaters from rose wine industry: Screening of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria isolates. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2024, 68, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zohoun, E.V.; Tang, E.N.; Soumanou, M.M.; Manful, J.; Akissoe, N.H.; Bigoga, J.; Futakuchi, K.; Ndindeng, S.A. Physicochemical and nutritional properties of rice as affected by parboiling steaming time at atmospheric pressure and variety. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 638–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bagchi, T.B.; Das, B.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, G.; Banerjee, J.; Gain, H.; Adhikari, A.A.; Chattopadhyay, K. Impact of cooking, parboiling and fermentation on nutritional components, predicted glycemic index and pasting properties of rice. J. Cereal Sci. 2023, 114, 103763. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, W.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, X.; et al. Light calcium carbonate improves pullulan biosynthesis by Aureobasidium pullulans under high concentration of sugar. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135760. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.Q.; Xiao, Q.Q.; Wu, Y. Capturing and recovering phosphorus in water via composite material: Research progress, future directions, and challenges. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 353, 128453. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vendruscolo, C.T.; Vendruscolo, J.L.S.; da Moreira, A.S. Meio de cultura para crescimento de Xanthomonas. Brazilian patent BR1220140300158, 5 November 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moreira, A.D.S.; Vendruscolo, J.L.S.; Gil-Turnes, C.; Vendruscolo, C.T. Screening among 18 novel strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv pruni. Food Hydrocoll. 2001, 15, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perez, I.A.; Macagnan, K.L.; Costa, E.D.S.M.; de Oliveira, G.D.; Ames, C.W.; Rossi, D.; da Silveira Moreira, A. Efeitos de novos extratos de levedura no crescimento celular, produção e viscosidade da xantana pruni por Xanthomonas arboricola pv pruni cepa 106. Braz. J. Dev. 2020, 6, 21543–21552. [Google Scholar]
  20. Moreira, A.S.; Foresti, A.P.; Rodrigues, A.A.; Macagnam, J.L.; Alves, M.I.; Vendruscolo, C.T. Bioconversion of Agri-Food Wastes into Biopolymers: A step towards circular bioeconomy. In Microbial Bioprocessing of Agri-Food Wastes, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; Volume 1, pp. 81–124. [Google Scholar]
  21. Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 3rd ed.; IMESP: São Paulo, Brazil, 1985; Volume 1, p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, S.; Olsen, C.E.; Marcussen, J. Methods for the assay of 1,5-anhydro-D-fructose and α-1,4-glucan lyase. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 305, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Junior, R.A.C.; Chagas, A.V.; Felix, C.S.; Souza, R.C.; Silva, L.A.; Lemos, V.A.; Ferreira, S.L. A closed inline system for sample digestion using 70% hydrogen peroxide and UV radiation. Determination of lead in wine employing ETAAS. Talanta 2019, 191, 479–484. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hayward, A.C. Bacteriophage sensitivity and biochemical group in Xanthomonas malvacearum. Microbiology 1964, 35, 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  25. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C.; Anderson-Cook, C.M. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Da Rosa, M.B.; Oreste, E.Q.; Bonemann, D.H.; Rodrigues, A.A.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Moreira, A.S.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Nunes, A.M. Evaluation of the use of a reflux system for sample preparation of xanthan gum and subsequent determination of Ca, Cu, K, Mg, Na and Zn by atomic spectrometry techniques. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2016, 27, 919–924. [Google Scholar]
  27. Murad, H.A.; Mohamed, S.H.; Abu-El-Khair, A.G. Impact of amino acids, nitrogen source, and buffering system on xanthan yield produced on hydrolyzed whey lactose. Biotechnology 2017, 16, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurbanoglu, E.B.; Kurbanoglu, N.I. Ram horn hydrolysate as enhancer of xanthan production in batch culture of Xanthomonas campestris EBK-4 isolate. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 1146–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carignatto, C.R.R.; Oliveira, K.S.M.; de Lima, V.M.G.; de Oliva Neto, P. New culture medium to xanthan production by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Indian J. Microbiol. 2011, 51, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. da Silva, J.A.; Cardoso, L.G.; de Jesus Assis, D.; Gomes, G.V.P.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; de Souza, C.O.; Druzian, J.I. Xanthan gum production by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris IBSBF 1866 and 1867 from lignocellulosic agroindustrial wastes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 186, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Macagnan, K.L.; Perez, I.A.; Costa, E.D.S.M.; Ames, C.W.; Soares, J.C.M.; Sourabié, A.; da Silveira Moreira, A. Influência de diferentes extratos de levedura (insumos) no crescimento celular de Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni cepa 101. Braz. J. Dev. 2021, 7, 15816–15824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ouyabe, M.; Kikuno, H.; Tanaka, N.; Babil, P.; Shiwachi, H. Isolation and identification of nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with Dioscorea alata L. and Dioscorea esculenta L. Microb. Resour. Syst. 2019, 35, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  33. Crugeira, P.J.L.; Almeida, H.H.S.; Marcet, I.; Rendueles, M.; Pires, M.G.; Rafael, H.M.; Rodrigues, A.I.G.; Santamaria-Echart, A.; Barreiro, M.F. Biosynthesis of antioxidant xanthan gum by Xanthomonas campestris using substrates added with moist olive pomace. Food Bioprod. Process. 2023, 141, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Garcia-Ochoa, F.; Santos, V.E.; Casas, J.A.; Gomez, E. Xanthan gum: Production, recovery, and properties. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18, 549–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); World Health Organization (WHO). Xanthan Gum. Compendium of Food Additive Specifications. In Proceedings of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 82nd Meeting 2016, FAO JECFA Monographs 19. Geneva, Switzerland, 7–16 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  36. Burdock, G.A. Food Chemicals Codex, 4th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  37. Torres, L.G.; Brito, E.; Galindo, E.; Choplin, L. Viscous behaviour of xanthan aqueous solutions from a variant strain of Xanthomonas campestris. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1993, 75, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Borges, C.D.; Bastos, C.P.; Vendruscolo, C.T. Avaliação das características físicas e químicas de gomas xantanas. Ciênc. Exatas Technol. 2007, 28, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Klaic, P.M.A.; Nunes, A.M.; da Silveira Moreira, A.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Ribeiro, A.S. Determination of Na, K, Ca and Mg in xanthan gum: Sample treatment by acid digestion. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 1895–1900. [Google Scholar]
  40. Galván, Z.R.N.; Soares, L.D.S.; Medeiros, E.A.A.; Soares, N.D.F.F.; Ramos, A.M.; Coimbra, J.S.D.R.; de Oliveira, E.B. Rheological properties of aqueous dispersions of xanthan gum containing different chloride salts are impacted by both sizes and net electric charges of the cations. Food Biophys. 2018, 13, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luporani, S.; Bretas, R. Rheological characterization of xanthan gum: Influence from univalent and trivalent metallic ions and from the temperature in dynamic experiments. Polímeros 2011, 21, 188–194. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effects of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on cell growth. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Figure 1. Effects of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on cell growth. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Fermentation 11 00191 g001
Figure 2. Effect of independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on yield. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Figure 2. Effect of independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on yield. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Fermentation 11 00191 g002
Figure 3. Effect of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on residual nitrogen. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Figure 3. Effect of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on residual nitrogen. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Fermentation 11 00191 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on xanthan pruni solutions consistency index (K). Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Figure 4. Effect of the independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on xanthan pruni solutions consistency index (K). Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Fermentation 11 00191 g004
Figure 5. Effect of independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on flow behavior index (ɳ) of xanthan pruni solutions. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Figure 5. Effect of independent variables (peptone, yeast extract, and RPW) on flow behavior index (ɳ) of xanthan pruni solutions. Asterisks (*) represents interactions between variables.
Fermentation 11 00191 g005
Table 1. Rice parboiling process wastewater characterization.
Table 1. Rice parboiling process wastewater characterization.
Parameters
pH4.6 ± 0.2
Reducing Sugars3.40 ± 0.16
Nitrogen (mg/dL)140.00 ± 1.12
Phosphorus (mg/L)304.96 ± 9.90
Zinc (mg/L)1.53 ± 0.05
Iron (mg/L)9.36 ± 0.33
Silicon (mg/L)39.43 ± 10.26
Calcium (mg/L)32.80 ± 0.41
Potassium (mg/L)4411.96 ± 196.21
Magnesium (mg/L)169.23 ± 8.37
Manganese (mg/L)43.17 ± 1.37
Sodium (mg/L)21.86 ± 1.88
Table 2. Matrix of the complete factorial design 23, with 3 central points for defining the peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations for X. arboricola pv. pruni 101 inocula production.
Table 2. Matrix of the complete factorial design 23, with 3 central points for defining the peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations for X. arboricola pv. pruni 101 inocula production.
Treat.Codified LevelsReal Levels
x1x2x3x1x2x3
1−1−1−11120
2+1−1−15120
3−1+1−11520
4+1+1−15520
5−1−1+11180
6+1−1+15180
7−1+1+11580
8+1+1+15580
90003350
100003350
110003350
x1 = peptone (g/L), x2 = yeast extract (g/L), and x3 = RPW (%); Treat. = treatment.
Table 3. X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 cell growth in media containing different peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations.
Table 3. X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 cell growth in media containing different peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations.
Treat.x1x2x3Cell Growth (UFC/mL)
1−1 (1)−1 (1)−1 (20)9.93 ± 0.01 *
2+1 (5)−1 (1)−1 (20)9.87 ± 0.04 *
3−1 (1)+1 (5)−1 (20)9.94 ± 0.04 *
4+1 (5)+1 (5)−1 (20)9.98 ± 0.04 *
5−1 (1)−1 (1)+1 (80)9.92 ± 0.04 *
6+1 (5)−1 (1)+1 (80)9.69 ± 0.01 *
7−1 (1)+1 (5)+1 (80)9.83 ± 0.01 *
8+1 (5)+1 (5)+1 (80)9.81 ± 0.01 *
90 (3)0 (3)0 (50)9.85 ± 0.03 *
100 (3)0 (3)0 (50)9.78 ± 0.01 *
110 (3)0 (3)0 (50)9.82 ± 0.01 *
SPA5--10.04 ± 0.01
x1 = peptone (g/L), x2 = yeast extract (g·L−1), and x3 = RPW (%). Samples’ asterisks (*) point to significant differences as compared to the standard (p < 0.05), according to the t-test.
Table 4. Yield of xanthan produced by X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 in media containing different peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations.
Table 4. Yield of xanthan produced by X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 in media containing different peptone, yeast extract, and RPW concentrations.
Treat.x1x2x3Yield (g/L)
1−1 (1)−1 (1)−1(20)7.233 ± 0.20 *
2+1 (5)−1 (1)−1 (20)7.393 ± 0.42 *
3−1 (1)+1 (5)−1 (20)7.123 ± 0.51 *
4+1 (5)+1 (5)−1 (20)7.333 ± 0.22 *
5−1 (1)−1 (1)+1 (80)7.020 ± 0.32
6+1 (5)−1 (1)+1 (80)7.533 ± 0.26 *
7−1 (1)+1 (5)+1 (80)7.343 ± 0.35 *
8+1 (5)+1 (5)+1 (80)8.943 ± 0.63 *
90 (3)0 (3)0 (50)7.610 ± 0.46 *
100 (3)0 (3)0 (50)7.683 ± 0.40 *
110 (3)0 (3)0 (50)7.393 ± 0.73 *
SPA5--6.770 ± 0.65
x1 = peptone (g/L), x2 = yeast extract (g/L), and x3 = RPW (%). Asterisks (*) on the samples point to significant differences as compared to the standard (p < 0.05), according to the t-test.
Table 5. Residual nitrogen in media containing different peptone, yield extract, and RPW concentrations at 0 and 24 h X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 cell growth.
Table 5. Residual nitrogen in media containing different peptone, yield extract, and RPW concentrations at 0 and 24 h X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 cell growth.
Treat.x1x2x3Residual
Nitrogen
0 h (mg/L)
Residual
Nitrogen
24 h (mg/L)
1−1 (1)−1 (1)−1(20)45.2 ± 1.3 *102.8 ± 8.6 *
2+1 (5)−1 (1)−1 (20)78.2 ± 1.9 *280.4 ± 4.5 *
3−1 (1)+1 (5)−1 (20)81.3 ± 3.2236.9 ± 6.1 *
4+1 (5)+1 (5)−1 (20)94.4 ± 2.8 *449.9 ± 4.6 *
5−1 (1)−1 (1)+1 (80)48.1 ± 2.5 *108.2 ± 8.5 *
6+1 (5)−1 (1)+1 (80)85.7 ± 1.9 *374.0 ± 6.1
7−1 (1)+1 (5)+1 (80)82.1 ± 2.5 *286.4 ± 7.5 *
8+1 (5)+1 (5)+1 (80)122.1 ± 9.0 *433.9 ± 8.6 *
90 (3)0 (3)0 (50)82.9 ± 1.6349.4 ± 3.2 *
100 (3)0 (3)0 (50)90.5 ± 1.9 *336.3 ± 5.5 *
110 (3)0 (3)0 (50)89.7 ± 0.9359.9 ± 9.3 *
SPA5--91.8 ± 0.6376.4 ± 1.8
x1 = peptone (g/L), x2 = yield extract (g/L), and x3 = RPW (%). Asterisks (*) on the samples point to significant differences as compared to the standard (p < 0.05), according to the t-test.
Table 6. X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 rheological parameters obtained from different RPW, peptone, and yeast extract concentrations.
Table 6. X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 rheological parameters obtained from different RPW, peptone, and yeast extract concentrations.
Treat.x1x2x3Consistency (K)Flow behavior (ɳ)
1−1 (1)−1 (1)−1(20)4.874 ± 0.051 *0.181 ± 0.004 *
2+1 (5)−1 (1)−1 (20)1.549 ± 0.018 *0.308 ± 0.006
3−1 (1)+1 (5)−1 (20)1.702 ± 0.011 *0.361 ± 0.000 *
4+1 (5)+1 (5)−1 (20)0.205 ± 0.002 *0.605 ± 0.000 *
5−1 (1)−1 (1)+1 (80)2.102 ± 0.099 *0.291 ± 0.013
6+1 (5)−1 (1)+1 (80)0.798 ± 0.024 *0.436 ± 0.004 *
7−1 (1)+1 (5)+1 (80)0.737 ± 0.004 *0.461 ± 0.005 *
8+1 (5)+1 (5)+1 (80)0.290 ± 0.002 *0.590 ± 0.019 *
90 (3)0 (3)0 (50)0.853 ± 0.018 *0.417 ± 0.000 *
100 (3)0 (3)0 (50)1.816 ± 0.027 *0.337 ± 0.009 *
110 (3)0 (3)0 (50)0.989 ± 0.071 *0.402 ± 0.015 *
SPA5--2.399 ± 0.0660.298 ± 0.007
x1 = peptone (g/L), x2 = yeast extract (g/L), and x3 = RPW (%). Asterisks (*) on the samples point to significant differences as compared to the standard (p < 0.05), according to the t-test.
Table 7. Mineral salts of xanthan gum obtained from Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 from different concentrations of rice parboiling water, peptone, and yeast extract.
Table 7. Mineral salts of xanthan gum obtained from Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strain 101 from different concentrations of rice parboiling water, peptone, and yeast extract.
Treat.P
(mg/g)
Zn
(mg/g)
Fe
(mg/g)
Si
(mg/g)
Ca
(mg/g)
K
(mg/g)
Mg
(mg/g)
Mn
(mg/g)
Na
(mg/g)
113.72 ± 0.53 *0.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.0040.05 ± 0.0031.84 ± 0.0221.53 ± 0.39 *3.51 ± 0.120.05 ± 0.001 *2.85 ± 0.04
213.54 ± 0.29 *0.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.0040.05 ± 0.011.98 ± 0.05 *25.33 ± 0.963.52 ± 0.280.05 ± 0.005 *2.53 ± 0.01 *
315.42 ± 0.32 *0.02 ± 0.0040.06 ± 0.005 *0.04 ± 0.0051.67 ± 0.1622.63 ± 0.35 *3.75 ± 0.09 *0.09 ± 0.14 *2.67 ± 0.08 *
416.08 ± 0.19 *0.05 ± 0.020.07 ± 0.006 *0.10 ± 0.01 *1.87 ± 0.0126.36 ± 1.354.06 ± 0.10 *0.05 ± 0.001 *2.92 ± 0.08
531.49 ± 1.73 *0.04 ± 0.0050.05 ± 0.006 *0.23 ± 0.01 *2.41 ± 0.08 *22.28 ± 0.15 *4.12 ± 0.07 *0.18 ± 0.012.95 ± 0.09
625.66 ± 2.03 *0.06 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.01 *0.16 ± 0.001 *2.76 ± 0.30 *26.06 ± 0.784.33 ± 0.25 *0.19 ± 0.022.41 ± 0.13 *
729.21 ± 1.37 *0.02 ± 0.0080.05 ± 0.003 *0.14 ± 0.01 *2.33 ± 0.11 *24.95 ± 0.104.34 ± 0.28 *0.15 ± 0.004 *2.40 ± 0.11 *
827.10 ± 0.05 *0.02 ± 0.0010.05 ± 0.008 *0.15 ± 0.02 *3.73 ± 0.07 *26.11 ± 0.034.61 ± 0.40 *0.11 ± 0.005 *2.59 ± 0.08 *
916.18 ± 0.33 *0.06 ± 0.0010.05 ± 0.003 *0.06 ± 0.012.21 ± 0.04 *25.66 ± 0.163.87 ± 0.07 *0.11 ± 0.004 *2.59 ± 0.05 *
1017.10 ± 0.05 *0.06 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.01 *0.08 ± 0.01 *1.86 ± 0.00322.28 ± 0.15 *4.24 ± 0.10 *0.09 ± 0.005 *2.48 ± 0.11 *
1118.33 ± 0.50 *0.02 ± 0.0010.07 ± 0.004 *0.12 ± 0.01 *2.24 ± 0.0424.14 ± 0.853.57 ± 0.02 *0.13 ± 0.006 *3.12 ± 0.08 *
SPA12.81 ± 0.030.03 ± 0.0010.03 ± 0.0040.05 ± 0.0011.59 ± 0.1325.80 ± 1.093.43 ± 0.050.19 ± 0.112.93 ± 0.04
Asterisks (*) on the samples point to significant differences as compared to the standard (p < 0.05), according to the t-test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pedone, I.S.; Aquino, F.I.; Costa, E.d.S.M.; Macagnan, K.L.; Porto, J.d.R.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Alves, M.I.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Moreira, A.d.S. Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I. Fermentation 2025, 11, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191

AMA Style

Pedone IS, Aquino FI, Costa EdSM, Macagnan KL, Porto JdR, Ribeiro AS, Alves MI, Vendruscolo CT, Moreira AdS. Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I. Fermentation. 2025; 11(4):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pedone, Isabel Santos, Fabíola Insaurriaga Aquino, Eduardo dos Santos Macedo Costa, Karine Laste Macagnan, Jéssica da Rosa Porto, Anderson Schwingel Ribeiro, Mariane Igansi Alves, Claire Tondo Vendruscolo, and Angelita da Silveira Moreira. 2025. "Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I" Fermentation 11, no. 4: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191

APA Style

Pedone, I. S., Aquino, F. I., Costa, E. d. S. M., Macagnan, K. L., Porto, J. d. R., Ribeiro, A. S., Alves, M. I., Vendruscolo, C. T., & Moreira, A. d. S. (2025). Assessment of Alternative Media Viability for Cell Growth Phase in the Lab-Scale Xanthan Pruni Production—Part I. Fermentation, 11(4), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop