Next Article in Journal
Urea-Induced Enhancement of Hypocrellin A Synthesis in Shiraia bambusicola GDMCC 60438: Strategies and Mechanisms
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Biosynthetic Gene Cluster in High GABA-Producing Enterococcus avium G-15
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Health-Promoting Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Technological Applications in Fermented Food Products and Beverages

1
Food College, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China
2
College of Food Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315800, China
3
Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Al Razi Institute, Lahore 54950, Pakistan
4
National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
5
Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
6
Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The Superior University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
7
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Microbiological Diagnostics, Medical University of Lodz, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
8
Institute of Pharmacy, Department Pharmaceutical Biology, Greifswald University, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 17, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(8), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080380
Submission received: 7 July 2024 / Revised: 21 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Fermentation for Food and Beverages 2024)

Abstract

:
Lactobacillus acidophilus is a probiotic bacterium that possesses numerous health-promoting properties and has significant technological applications in the fermentation of a wide range of food products and beverages. This review discusses the health benefits of L. acidophilus, including its ability to enhance immunity; promote digestive wellness; and exhibit antioxidant, antitumor, and antimicrobial properties. This review also discusses the production of bioactive peptides and extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) by L. acidophilus. Factors, such as salinity, temperature, carbon sources, and nutrient availability, influence the growth of L. acidophilus, which can affect the survival and bioactive potential of fermented products. The proteolytic effects of L. acidophilus contribute to protein breakdown, which leads to the release of bioactive peptides with various health benefits. This review also discusses the applications of L. acidophilus in the fermentation of dairy products, cereal beverages, soymilk, fruit and vegetable juices, and other functional food preparations, highlighting its potential for improving the nutritional value, organoleptic properties, and probiotic delivery of these products. This review highlights the importance of understanding and controlling fermentation conditions to maximize the growth and health-promoting benefits of L. acidophilus in various food and beverage products.

1. Introduction

Lactobacillus acidophilus is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped microorganism that exhibits several key characteristics. This bacterium is crucial for human well-being, as it aids in conditions such as lactose intolerance, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia and prevents Helicobacter pylori infections [1,2]. It is commonly present in the gut and helps maintain optimal health. Specifically, it helps maintain the equilibrium of the microbiota, supports digestion, enhances nutrient absorption, and fortifies the immune system. Moreover, research has shown that L. acidophilus has the potential to decrease serum cholesterol levels, stabilize enteric microbiota, and combat cancer cells [3]. Additionally, L. acidophilus can inhibit the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria within the intestine, regulate the balance of intestinal flora, and enhance resistance, ultimately promoting growth and improving immunity [4]. Factors such as salinity, temperature, carbon sources, and nutrient availability can affect the growth of L. acidophilus. Studies have suggested that the survival and growth of L. acidophilus are influenced by salinity and temperature variations during fermentation [5]. The presence of essential nutrients such as amino acids, riboflavin, and minerals such as Mn2+ also plays a crucial role in enhancing the growth of L. acidophilus in fermented products [6]. Furthermore, optimizing the carbon source and concentration in the fermentation medium is essential for promoting the growth, phenolic production, and antioxidant activity of L. acidophilus. It is vital to understand and control these conditions to maximize the growth and bioactive potential of L. acidophilus during various fermentation processes [7]. Lactobacillus acidophilus exerts functional and proteolytic effects on various food products. It accelerates the growth of bacteria in milk, affecting lactic acid content and pH. Lactobacillus acidophilus exhibits proteolytic effects through its proteolytic system, involving components like CEPs (C-terminally encoded peptides) that cleave proteins into peptides, which are then internalized and degraded into amino acids by various peptidases. This system enables L. acidophilus to utilize proteins as a nitrogen source for growth, particularly in low-amino acid environments, such as milk. The proteolytic activities of L. acidophilus contribute to the breakdown of proteins, leading to the release of bioactive peptides with various health benefits, such as antioxidant [8], antibacterial [9], immunomodulatory [10], and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities [11]. Different strains of L. acidophilus may exhibit varying protein hydrolysis patterns that are influenced by factors such as CEP gene expression and enzymatic activity conditions.
Lactobacillus acidophilus has multiple applications in the food industry, including the fermentation of milk, enhancement of phenolic compounds, and extension of shelf life through microencapsulation. It is used in dairy products to increase nutrient absorption, adjust intestinal flora, and improve animal health [12]. Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation enhances branched-chain amino acids and antioxidants in wheat bran, suggesting its potential application in functional cereal products to improve their nutritional value [13]. Lactobacillus acidophilus in cereal beverages may provide probiotic benefits such as those to gastrointestinal health, immune stimulation, and antimicrobial properties; enhance nutritional value; and potentially replace dairy probiotic foods [14]. It also enhances the antioxidant potential, viscosity, and isoflavonoid content of fermented soymilk, suggesting its beneficial application in vegan milk production [15]. Moreover, it is a novel probiotic for the fermentation of fruit and vegetable juice blends (artichokes), pineapple, squash, spinach, and cucumbers. Its application has been demonstrated in the development of functional beverages that enhance consumer acceptability and viability [16]. Lactobacillus acidophilus enhances probiotic delivery, increases antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity, and improves beverage bioactivity during the fermentation of apple juice [17]. Lactobacillus acidophilus in vegetable juices enhances probiotic content, antioxidant activity, and organoleptic properties, providing lactose-intolerant vegan consumers with healthy non-dairy options. Lactobacillus acidophilus has a wide range of applications in functional and edible probiotic preparations because of its resistance to acid and bile salts and its health-promoting properties in a variety of food products [18].
This review examines the health-promoting properties of L. acidophilus, particularly its ability to enhance immunity, improve gut health, and exhibit antioxidant, antitumor, and antimicrobial properties. This review also discusses the potential production of bioactive peptides and extracellular polysaccharides by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Furthermore, the effects of L. acidophilus on the fermentation of various food products such as milk, cheese, yogurt, meat, and baking products have been reported. Finally, this review discusses the potential role of Lactobacillus acidophilus in the fermentation of plant-based beverages.

2. Health-Promoting Benefits of L. acidophilus

Lactobacillus acidophilus has various health benefits. Research has indicated that L. acidophilus plays a crucial role in improving cardiovascular health, lactose intolerance, cancer prevention, immune regulation, and gastrointestinal diseases [18]. Additionally, L. acidophilus exhibits antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, contributing to its protective effects [1]. The immunomodulatory abilities of L. acidophilus can initiate anti-inflammatory responses, enhance phagocytosis, induce defensin production, and modulate intestinal permeability, all of which are essential for immunity enhancement and overall gut health. Clinical trials have shown that consuming acidophilus milk enriched with L. acidophilus can aid in managing conditions such as diarrhea [19], constipation [20], and Alzheimer’s disease [21], showing its potential as an adjunct treatment for various health issues [22,23]. Furthermore, studies have highlighted the bioactive potential of L. acidophilus in fermented products, such as cheese, yogurt, fermented milk, and baking products, and its producing peptides with antihypertensive properties, thus emphasizing its role in enhancing the health benefits of food products [24,25]. The health-promoting effects of L. acidophilus on disease prevention, immunity enhancement, gut wellness, and the bioactivity of potential components are shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Immunity Enhancement

Lactobacillus acidophilus has been extensively studied for its role in immunity enhancement. Research indicates that L. acidophilus supplementation can improve immune responses by increasing humoral immunity levels, such as with IgG and IgA, and enhancing cellular immunity, leading to a strengthened immune system [26,27]. Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a crucial role in enhancing immunity through various mechanisms. Studies have shown that L. acidophilus can modulate immune responses by increasing CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels, enhancing IgA production, and reducing IL-6 and TNF-α levels [28,29]. Moreover, studies have demonstrated the immune system-boosting properties of L. acidophilus in poultry. In particular, it has been shown to elevate antibody levels and enhance the immune response to vaccinations, including those against the Newcastle disease virus, suggesting its potential as an immune booster in vaccination programs [29].

2.2. Gut Wellness

Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-05 has demonstrated encouraging potential in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders by regulating the immune system, enhancing lactose tolerance, and providing relief from conditions such as colitis [30]. Studies have highlighted the ability of LA-05 to regulate intestinal flora, produce metabolites that inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth, and enhance anti-inflammatory effects by modulating TLR expression. L. acidophilus can produce organic acids like acetic and lactic acid, which lower pH levels and inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, contributing to a healthy gut environment [2]. Lactobacillus acidophilus has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the duration and severity of diarrhea in individuals, particularly children. Research has shown that L. acidophilus can effectively combat acute gastroenteritis by decreasing the frequency and duration of diarrheal episodes. This probiotic strain has been found to positively affect the immune system, enhance both specific and non-specific immunity, and regulate the body’s response to pathogens. The probiotic properties of L. acidophilus extend to maintaining intestinal homeostasis, supporting intestinal epithelial integrity, and ameliorating gastrointestinal disorders. Furthermore, L. acidophilus has been shown to modulate immune responses by restoring the balance of intestinal microbiota [31,32].

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

Lactobacillus acidophilus exhibits significant antimicrobial activity against various pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. Research indicates that L. acidophilus inhibits the growth of pathogens such as Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus by producing antibacterial substances including lactic acid and bacteriocins [1,33]. Moreover, studies have shown that L. acidophilus inhibits gas production via Cl. perfringens, further highlighting their antimicrobial properties [26]. In addition, L. acidophilus was found to have a strong inhibitory effect on Candida spp. [12]. Researchers isolated 32 types of good bacteria, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), from 13 honey samples sold in Malaysia, six of which were identified as Lactobacillus acidophilus, which showed the ability to kill harmful bacteria that are resistant to many antibiotics. The antibacterial activity of these LAB strains was tested against three types of harmful bacteria: S. aureus, S. epidermis, and Bacillus subtilis, which showed significant inhibition zones, indicating that they could effectively inhibit the growth of these bacteria [9]. Antimicrobial activity is often attributed to the production of organic acids, which lower pH and create an unfavorable environment for pathogens, as well as the secretion of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances [34]. The cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus acidophilus has shown significant antimicrobial activity against various harmful bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. This indicates that the substances produced by L. acidophilus can inhibit the growth of these pathogens. L. acidophilus has been found to prevent the formation of biofilms by harmful bacteria like E. coli and S. aureus, making it harder for these pathogens to establish infections [35]. The antimicrobial properties of L. acidophilus are not only beneficial for food preservation and safety but also for therapeutic applications, such as reducing the risk of gastrointestinal diseases and inhibiting the growth of intestinal pathogens. Overall, the diverse antimicrobial mechanisms of L. acidophilus make it a valuable probiotic for improving human health and food safety [3,36].

2.4. Antitumor Activity

Lactobacillus acidophilus exhibits anticarcinogenic and antitumor effects through various mechanisms. Research suggests that probiotics such as L. acidophilus can inhibit carcinogens, activate the host immune system, and reduce intestinal pH, potentially preventing tumor formation [37]. Additionally, L. acidophilus exopolysaccharides have been shown to suppress inflammation through the TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway, offering protection against hepatocellular carcinoma [38]. Lactobacillus acidophilus has demonstrated significant anticarcinogenic and antitumor effects in various studies. Studies have shown that L. acidophilus strains, such as KLDS1.0901 and CICC 6074, inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells, such as HT-29, and induce apoptosis through mechanisms involving mitochondrial membrane potential loss, reactive oxygen species generation, and the modulation of apoptotic signaling pathways [39,40]. Al-Asfour et al. [41] aimed to observe the suppression of oral carcinoma cells by Lactobacillus acidophilus. They exposed human oral cancer cells to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans, both separately and together, to observe their effects on cancer cell growth and survival. The results showed that Lactobacillus acidophilus significantly reduced the number of cancer cells, and this effect was linked to an increase in a protein that helps trigger cell death in cancer cells. This study suggests that Lactobacillus acidophilus may be useful in treating oral cancer as it can reduce cancer cell growth through a specific cell death mechanism, and this effect is not hindered by the presence of Streptococcus mutans.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity

Several studies have demonstrated the antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Rianingsih and Sumardianto [7] demonstrated that the antioxidant activity of L. acidophilus is higher than that of L. plantarum during fermentation, which may be attributed to the production of antioxidant compounds. Furthermore, cell-free extracts of L. acidophilus displayed antiproliferative and antioxidant activities against the HT-29 cell line, reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis through intrinsic and extrinsic pathways [42]. Additionally, the fermentation of seaweed extracts with L. acidophilus resulted in increased antioxidant activity, demonstrating the potential of this probiotic strain (LA-05) to enhance antioxidant properties [7]. Moreover, the development of antioxidant activity in whey drinks containing L. acidophilus LA5 has been observed, with free bacteria showing increased antioxidant activity over time, indicating the role of L. acidophilus in promoting antioxidant effects during fermentation processes [43]. Collectively, these findings highlight the antioxidant potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus under various experimental settings. Studies on the antioxidant and antitumor properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus are detailed in Table 1.

2.6. Bioactive Peptides

Lactobacillus acidophilus is a prolific producer of bioactive peptides with diverse therapeutic potentials, including antioxidant, antiviral, antifungal, and antimicrobial activities. The antioxidant properties of peptides derived from L. acidophilus are significantly enhanced through controlled fermentation processes because of their ability to produce antioxidant peptides during milk and meat fermentation, which can significantly enhance the therapeutic potential of fermented products [46]. Okon et al. [47] found that the use of the bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus, especially in dry-cured loins, increased the antioxidant activity of proteins during fermentation and storage, with small peptides showing the highest antioxidant capacity. The results revealed that the antioxidant peptides SAGNPN, AAAAG, IHSGSVG, NVLVG, NAAKL, and GLAGA exhibited the highest antioxidant activities. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus are gaining attention because of their potential applications in combating multi-resistant bacteria and food preservation. AMPs, such as the newly discovered peptide Doderlin with the sequence PTHLLKAFSKAGF, exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against pathogens such as Candida albicans, showing their potential in the pharmaceutical and food industries. The production of AMPs by L. acidophilus can be optimized under specific conditions, such as temperature, fermentation time, and yeast extract concentration, which enhance their inhibitory effects against pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes [48]. The functional bioactive peptides produced by the Lactobacillus acidophilus strains are listed in Table 2.

2.7. Extracellular Polysaccharides Production

The production and application of EPS from L. acidophilus and other LAB strains holds significant promise for enhancing food quality and promoting human health through their multifunctional properties [56]. Extracellular polysaccharide production by Lactobacillus acidophilus, particularly strain BCRC 10695, has been extensively studied for its beneficial effects and potential applications in food and pharmaceutical industries. The production process involves optimizing the composition of the culture medium, including carbon sources such as sucrose, nitrogen sources such as yeast extract, and surfactants such as polysorbate 80. Using response surface methodology (RSM), the optimal concentrations were determined to be 10.15 g/L sucrose, 25 g/L yeast extract, and 2 g/L polysorbate 80, resulting in an EPS yield of 923.7 mg/L after 96 h of cultivation [57]. Lactobacillus acidophilus is known for its production of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), which have various functional properties, such as enhanced taste, texture, and health benefits, including immunomodulatory and anticancer activities. Recently, in Deepak et al. [58], EPS was found to be effective under both normal- and low-oxygen conditions, increasing the expression of certain genes related to cancer inhibition. EPS production was optimized using specific design methods, achieving a peak EPS concentration of 597 mg/L during batch cultivation. Abedfar et al. [59] isolated Lactobacillus acidophilus from rice bran sourdough, which produces a special substance (EPS) with high carbohydrate content and antioxidant properties. They used various methods to identify and analyze EPS, confirming its structure and components such as glucose, galactose, and maltose. The EPS from Lactobacillus acidophilus showed significant antioxidant activity, suggesting that it could be useful as a functional ingredient. Overall, the production and application of EPS from L. acidophilus holds significant promise for enhancing food quality and promoting human health through their multifunctional properties.

3. Applications of L. acidophilus in Fermented Food Products

3.1. Cheese

Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a crucial role in various cheese types because of its probiotic properties and bioactive potential. It is a Gram-positive lactic acid bacterium that can produce antimicrobial peptides, inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, and enhance the overall quality of dairy products [60]. Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a crucial role in cheese production as a probiotic microorganism, enhancing the survival and growth of beneficial bacteria in dairy products. Research has shown that incorporating L. acidophilus into cheese formulations can increase probiotic counts, improve viability during storage, and provide health benefits for consumers. Studies have demonstrated that the addition of L. acidophilus to cheese can protect against spoilage organisms, enhance the texture and sensory properties of the product, and contribute to the development of synbiotic cheeses containing prebiotics such as pectin, inulin, and maltodextrin [4,10,61]. Neto et al. [62] developed and tested L. acidophilus microparticles with L-cysteine hydrochloride and/or ascorbic acid for use in Reino cheese. They monitored the survival of these microorganisms for more than 60 days and analyzed the best formulation in terms of size and shape. Three cheese types were prepared: one without Lactobacillus acidophilus, one with free microorganisms, and one with microparticles. The cheeses were tested for microbiological quality and Lactobacillus viability after 1 and 25 d of ripening. The best microparticle formulation showed over 80% encapsulation yield and 33% lactobacilli survival after 60 d. Cheese containing these microparticles had the highest viability of lactobacilli, indicating better protection and potential for industrial use. Diniz-Silva et al. [4] determined the effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus along with oregano and rosemary essential oils in the production of Minas Frescal cheese during refrigerated storage. The essential oils improved the efficiency of probiotics, which reduced E. coli counts in the first 15 days of storage, and this reduction was linked to the presence of terpenes in the cheese. Over time, the terpenes decreased, but improved the aroma, flavor, and overall appeal of cheese. Together, these essential oils could help control E. coli in probiotic cheese, but the amounts need to be carefully chosen to avoid negative taste effects. In a previous study, Lopes et al. [60] evaluated the effects of L. acidophilus on Ricotta cheese prepared from goat milk. The addition of probiotics made it softer, stickier, and more cohesive, changed its color, and increased its yield. Microencapsulation helped the probiotics survive better and improved the texture and flavor of cheese. Cheese with microencapsulated probiotics exhibited no moisture loss, less breakdown of proteins and acids, and a better taste with fruity and floral notes while maintaining high probiotic levels even in simulated digestion. Mojaddar Langroodi et al. [61] examined the effects of Anethum graveolens essential oil (DEO) and Lactobacillus acidophilus to prevent Escherichia coli O157 in cheese. Different concentrations of DEO and L. acidophilus reduced E. coli O157 counts and improved taste and pH. The combination of DEO and L. acidophilus strongly inhibited E. coli O157, thereby confirming DEO’s positive role in dairy products. Furthermore, the survival of L. acidophilus during the fermentation and ripening stages of cheese production is essential for maintaining probiotic viability and ensuring the desired health effects for consumers.

3.2. Yogurt

Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a crucial role in yogurt production by binding aflatoxin B1, enhancing probiotic properties, and improving the quality of the final product. Research indicates that L. acidophilus, when combined with inulin and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), can increase coagulation time, extend the shelf life of yogurt, and positively affect sensory attributes [63,64]. Furthermore, incorporating L. acidophilus into yogurt formulations has been shown to increase the number of viable bacteria, improve viscosity, and enhance physicochemical properties during storage [65]. Additionally, probiotic yogurt fortified with L. acidophilus has been found to effectively reduce lactose intolerance symptoms, making it a recommended treatment option for lactose intolerant individuals [66]. Mousavi et al. [67] prepared synbiotic yogurt with Lactobacillus acidophilus and flaxseed, focusing on optimizing probiotic count, texture, and taste. They used a central composite design (CCD) with flaxseed concentration (0–4%) and storage time (1–28 d) as variables. The results showed that flaxseed concentration and storage time significantly affected probiotic viability, texture, and the sensory attributes of yogurt. Moreover, the addition of flaxseed increased L. acidophilus growth, viscosity, hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and water-holding capacity while reducing syneresis and adhesiveness. However, high flaxseed levels reduce sensory appeal. Overall, 4% flaxseed in probiotic yogurt resulted in a functional product with 76.8% desirability that maintained good properties for approximately 13 days during refrigerated storage. Masoumi et al. [65] prepared tested probiotic yogurt with L. acidophilus in 55 lactose-intolerant patients. The experimental group had fewer symptoms and lower hydrogen levels than the control group, indicating that probiotic yogurt can help to treat lactose intolerance. Patients were divided into two groups: one group received non-probiotic yogurt, and the other received probiotic yogurt for one week. These results suggest that probiotic yogurt is a safe and effective treatment to reduce lactose intolerance. Hasani et al. [68] examined the effect of different concentrations of barley bran on the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus and the physical and taste properties of low-fat yogurt over 28 days. The results showed that the addition of barley bran increased the bacterial count and thickness of yogurt compared to the control group. High barley bran levels (1.2%) reduced taste scores but increased thickness. The 0.6% barley bran level maintained good taste and had a bacterial count higher than the minimum acceptable level, making it the recommended amount for making symbiotic yogurt. Ertem et al. [69] tested the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and dry white mulberry and walnut paste (Gobdin) on probiotic yogurt properties. Six types of yogurt were prepared with different amounts of Gobdin and bacterial combinations, and then stored at 4 °C. The highest L. acidophilus count was observed in 5% Gobdin yogurt on day 7, whereas the lowest count was observed in control yogurt on day 21. Despite this decline, all probiotic yogurts maintained beneficial bacterial levels above 8 log CFU/g for 21 days. The 5% Gobdin yogurt showed the highest acceptability on day 1; however, all yogurts scored well overall. The study concluded that yogurt containing 5% Gobdin and L. acidophilus is a viable new functional food. Overall, the presence of L. acidophilus in yogurt contributes to its health benefits, quality, and consumer acceptance.

3.3. Fermented Milk

Fermented milk is a dairy product produced through a fermentation process involving lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, which play a crucial role in the development of the characteristic flavors of the product. When combined with other probiotics such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus acidophilus, fermented milk can act as a therapeutic agent for gastrointestinal disorders, offering antimicrobial, anticarcinogenic, and antioxidant activities [70]. The fermentation of milk with specific strains, such as L. acidophilus LA-5, can lead to various health benefits, including improved digestion, immune response stimulation, and potential protection against intestinal diseases. Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a crucial role in milk fermentation by enhancing various properties and health benefits. It has been shown to reduce serum cholesterol levels, stabilize the microbiota, stimulate the immune system, improve lactose digestion, and potentially combat cancer cells [71]. Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 is a probiotic used in fermented milk, but grows slowly in milk, which is not ideal for commercial production. Therefore, understanding its nutrient requirements can help speed up the fermentation process. The essential nutrients for L. acidophilus LA-5 include amino acids such as Asn, Asp, Cys, Leu, and Met; vitamins such as riboflavin; and nucleotides such as guanine and uracil, along with the metal ion Mn2+. The addition of these nutrients to milk can significantly reduce fermentation time by up to 9 h, which is beneficial for producing fermented milk more quickly and efficiently. When these nutrients are added, the viable cell count of L. acidophilus LA-5 increases, indicating that more live bacteria are present in the final product, enhancing its probiotic benefits [6]. Dabaj et al. [70] examined the effects of two Lactobacilli strains, L. casei 431 and L. acidophilus La-5, on fermented milk. They identified 105 different compounds, with ketones being the most common, and found that L. acidophilus La-5 produced more key flavor compounds. This research suggests that L. acidophilus La-5 could be a good starter culture for producing tasty fermented dairy products because of its ability to produce important flavor compounds. Li et al. [72] found that adding onion juice to milk helps the bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus grow better and produce more acid. This leads to higher cell counts and better storage stability, likely due to the presence of polyphenols, sulfur compounds, fructans, and minerals in onion juice. Onion juice also slightly improves the antioxidant capacity of fermented milk, resulting in shorter fermentation times, better antioxidant properties, and richer flavors, making it useful for industrial applications.

3.4. Fortified Milk Products

Fortified milk products are dairy beverages enriched with additional nutrients or bioactive compounds, which enhance their nutritional value and health benefits. Research has shown that fortifying milk with extracts, such as pomegranate peel [8] and date extract [73], and probiotic strains, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-05, ATCC 4356, and LA-308 [74], can significantly increase the antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, and probiotic content of the final product. These fortified milk products undergo specific preparation methods, including fermentation with beneficial bacteria, such as L. acidophilus, to ensure the incorporation of added nutrients while maintaining the quality and safety of the beverage. Elkot et al. [75] developed a synbiotic ice cream using camel milk and black rice powder (BRP), enhancing physicochemical properties and Lactobacillus acidophilus viability during storage. Black rice powder was incorporated into ice cream blends at different levels, resulting in increased overrun, viscosity, and melting resistance, while decreasing the freezing point. Sensory evaluation favored treatments with 25% BRP, showing an improved viability of probiotic bacteria over 60 d of storage. By fortifying milk with various ingredients, manufacturers can offer consumers a diverse range of functional dairy products that not only provide essential nutrients but also offer additional health-promoting properties.

3.5. Meat Products

Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL641, a probiotic strain commonly used in meat fermentation, has been shown to inhibit spoilage bacteria in refrigerated meat systems, thereby enhancing shelf life and quality [76]. Studies have demonstrated that the incorporation of L. acidophilus into meat products can improve flavor, texture, and color, making them more acceptable to consumers [77,78]. Additionally, the use of L. acidophilus LA-308 in fermented meat spreads has been linked to enhanced tenderness and flavor of the meat, demonstrating the potential of probiotics to improve meat quality and its sensory characteristics [79]. Furthermore, the fermentation process involving L. acidophilus has been found to reduce protein oxidation levels, increase water- and oil-holding capacities, and positively impact the texture of meat analogs, highlighting the multifaceted benefits of probiotic fermentation in meat products. Arief et al. [76] assessed the effects of probiotic lactic acid bacteria, specifically Lactobacillus acidophilus IIA-2B4, on the pH, texture, color, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds properties of the fermented beef sausages. The results indicated significant differences in these attributes, highlighting the potential influence of probiotics on the overall quality and characteristics of the sausages. The bioprotective extracts of L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 exhibited antimicrobial activity against Lactobacillus sakei CRL1407 in refrigerated meat models, BE-1 completely inhibited the spoilage strain, and BE-2 exerted bacteriostatic effects. The antimicrobial activity correlated with inhibitory treatment efficacy, while flow cytometry revealed a high percentage of dead cells with BE-1 treatment, indicating the potential of lactic acid bacteria as biocontrol agents to extend the shelf life of fresh meat [80].

3.6. Baking Products

Lactobacillus acidophilus has a significant effect on fermented bread, especially when encapsulated in alginate/fish gelatin, as shown in various studies. The encapsulation of L. acidophilus in alginate/fish gelatin capsules can enhance its viability during baking and storage, with a 3% matrix exhibiting the highest protective effect [81]. Additionally, the addition of xanthan gum and maltodextrin to the alginate matrix improves the encapsulation yield and provides better protection for the probiotic during baking and storage, ensuring its viability [82]. Furthermore, the double-layered encapsulation of L. acidophilus using sodium alginate and chitosan enhanced the survival of the bacteria, particularly during storage, indicating its potential as a beneficial component of bread products [83]. Overall, these findings highlight the positive effects of L. acidophilus on the quality and viability of probiotics in fermented bread, thereby demonstrating its potential as a health-promoting ingredient in baking products. Bread is popular because of its variety and ease of use. Truong et al. [82] prepared probiotic cream bread using microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus with different combinations of alginate, maltodextrin, and xanthan gum. Xanthan gum improved the encapsulation yield by more than 92% for some samples. During baking, the viability of L. acidophilus decreased less in samples containing xanthan gum and maltodextrin than in other samples. In simulated stomach and intestinal conditions, the combination of xanthan gum and maltodextrin provided the best protection for probiotics, acting as buffers and protective agents, and improving probiotic survival. Mirzamani et al. [83] prepared the probiotic bread using Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 to improve its resistance to stomach conditions and heat during bread baking. The first layer, 1% alginate, exhibited the best survival under stomach-like conditions. The second layer used 0.5% chitosan, which made the probiotics more heat resistant. The study found that higher levels of alginate and xanthan reduced the encapsulation efficiency; however, 1% xanthan resulted in the best yield. Chitosan provided a smoother surface, which protected probiotics. In bread, 1% chitosan in the outer layer helped the probiotics survive better, both when fresh and after 24 h. An overview of Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation for the development of food products is presented in Table 3.

4. Applications of L. acidophilus in Fermented Plant-Based Beverages

4.1. Fruit Juices

The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on fruits varies depending on fruit type and fermentation process. Research has shown that L. acidophilus can improve the nutritional value, antioxidant activity, enzymatic browning, and sensory attributes of fruit juices such as apple [17], yellow mombin [88], papaya [89], and pear [90]. Fermentation with L. acidophilus can lead to changes in pH, organic acids, sugars, and the production of beneficial compounds such as lactic acid, enhancing the quality of the final product. Additionally, the presence of L. acidophilus in fruit juices can contribute to improved microbial stability, nutritional value, and potential health benefits, owing to its probiotic nature. Different fruits exhibit varying responses to L. acidophilus LA-02 fermentation, highlighting the importance of considering a specific fruit matrix when utilizing this probiotic bacterium in fruit products [88,91]. Peng et al. [91] tested different types of Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria and fermented nine kinds of cloudy apple juice. Changfu contained the most bacteria and acetic acid, Golden Delicious contained the most sugar, and Qinguan contained the most lactic acid and esters. Changfu, Qinguan, and Golden Delicious were the best for producing tasty, aromatic, and highly bacteria-fermented cloudy apple juices. Ribeiro et al. [88] aimed to test yellow mombin juice as a carrier for the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-02. The best conditions for making the juice were found to be a pH of 6.4 and 16 h of fermentation, resulting in high probiotic viability. The juice had good chemical properties, including a high phenolic content and antioxidant activity. It also showed antibacterial effects against certain harmful bacteria and remained stable for 28 days at 4 °C, with no significant loss of probiotic viability under simulated stomach conditions. Karbasi et al. [92] unbleached date syrup to make a non-dairy probiotic drink with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. They examined growth, pH, acidity, sugars, organic acids, phenolic content, antioxidant activity over 48 h at 37 °C, and cell viability for 4 weeks at 4 °C. Both bacteria grew well in date syrup, especially L. acidophilus, which showed better growth and higher sugar consumption. L. acidophilus produced more gluconic acid than lactic acid and maintained higher cell viability after 4 weeks. The total phenolic and antioxidant activities were similar for both the bacteria. Li et al. [90] fermented browned pear juice with Lactobacillus acidophilus CH-2 to reduce browning effects. Various tests have been conducted to analyze color changes and antioxidant activity. The results showed a significant reduction in browning and color difference after fermentation. The degree of browning and color difference decreased notably, and the fermentation supernatant exhibited high antioxidant activity. The reduction in browning is likely due to two factors: the production of strong antioxidant metabolites by L. acidophilus CH-2 and the breakdown of browning products during fermentation. Sheng et al. [93] reported that mixed cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus-26 improved the quality of fermented red globe grape juice more than single cultures. They increase the number of viable bacteria, reduce total sugars, and enhance antioxidant properties, pH, and functionality. Mixed cultures also enriched the juice aroma with esters, acids, alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones. They significantly increased the content of compounds, such as acetic acid, ethyl acetate, and 2-hexenol, contributing to the unique flavor of the juice.

4.2. Vegetable Juices

Lactobacillus acidophilus ferments vegetable juices by utilizing the sugars present in the juices to produce lactic acid, which lowers the pH and increases the acidity of the juice, thereby enhancing its shelf life and safety. This process also results in the production of beneficial organic acids and vitamins, which contribute to the nutritional value of juice [94,95]. The fermentation process involves bacteria metabolizing glucose and other sugars, which leads to a reduction in glucose levels and an increase in lactic acid concentrations, as observed in various studies [96,97]. The addition of nutrients such as glucose, lactose, and prebiotics can further accelerate the fermentation process, improve the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus, and inhibit the growth of contaminating microorganisms, thus enhancing the flavor and taste of juice [98]. Lavinia et al. [99] tested cucumber, white cabbage juices, and red cabbage juices for growing Lactobacillus acidophilus to make probiotic products. Cabbage juice showed a rapid drop in pH and a large increase in microbes, whereas cucumber juice had the fastest acidification rate. All juices complete fermentation within approximately 6 h. Using statistical methods, the study grouped variables into three clusters and used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to simplify the data, explaining 80.43% of the total variation. Tenguria et al. [100] explored the use of probiotic bacteria in non-dairy products like carrot juice to avoid issues like milk allergies and lactose intolerance. Carrots are nutritious and popular particularly in India. The study tested carrot juice with Lactobacillus acidophilus for 30 days, comparing it to juice with benzoic acid and a control with no additives. They evaluated properties such as color, smell, texture, pH, and total soluble solids. The results showed that carrot juice with probiotics maintained a better quality than the control and was similar to that of fresh juice. This suggests that carrot juice is a good medium for delivering probiotics.

4.3. Grains and Nuts Beverages

Lactobacillus acidophilus plays a significant role in enhancing the nutritional value and bioavailability of bioactive compounds in various beverages. Research indicates that the fermentation of beverages with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-20079 leads to an increase in total phenol and flavonoid content, contributing to the antioxidant activity of the beverage. Additionally, the amino acids released during fermentation affect the flavor profile and biological value of the beverage, with specific amino acids such as glutamic acid, aspartic acid, threonine, serine, and alanine being significantly higher in fermented beverages [101]. Igwebuike et al. [102] evaluated the properties of a drink made from partially hydrolyzed tigernut milk and beetroot juice fermented with the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-02. The drink was tested in different beetroot juice concentrations (10%, 20%, and 30%) and compared to a control without beetroot juice. The results showed that hydrolysis decreased starch content and increased sugar content. The pH decreased over time, and the titratable acidity increased. All samples supported the growth of L. acidophilus LA-02, with a significant increase in the bacterial counts. Sensory evaluation indicated varying degrees of likeness for color, aroma, mouthfeel, taste, and overall acceptability. A 20% beetroot juice blend was recommended based on sensory preferences, and the drink showed potential as a probiotic.

4.4. Bean Milk

Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-05, a probiotic strain, has been extensively studied for its beneficial effects on various food products. Research has indicated that L. acidophilus thrives in bean milk, contributing to the fermentation process and enhancing the properties of the product. Studies have shown that the addition of bean components, such as faba bean, can positively affect pH reduction and the fermentative capacity of the microflora, leading to improved outcomes in terms of bacterial counts, lactic acid content, and overall product quality [103,104,105,106,107]. Furthermore, optimizing the carbon source and concentration in the fermentation medium is crucial for the growth and phenolic production of L. acidophilus, highlighting the importance of the medium composition in maximizing the potential of probiotics in bean milk. Additionally, the growth kinetics and survival of L. acidophilus in different types of milk, including black rice milk, further emphasize the adaptability and efficacy of the strain in diverse food matrices, demonstrating its potential in bean milk applications [5]. Boudjou et al. [103] tested whole ground faba bean in kefir to observe bacterial growth during storage. The addition of 4% faba bean flour increased the abundance of bacteria, increased acidity, and lowered pH over 28 d at 4 °C. Faba bean flour was found to significantly enhance the survival and growth of probiotic bacteria like Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis during the storage of kefir, which is a fermented milk drink. This is crucial to maintain the health benefits of kefir over time. The supplementation of kefir with faba bean flour extended its shelf life by maintaining the viability of probiotic bacteria and preventing spoilage. This makes it a practical option for both producers and consumers. Aduol et al. [108] fermented cowpea milk using Lactobacillus acidophilus. The fermentation process led to a significant decrease in crude fat (except for one culture) and carbohydrates, whereas crude fiber was not detected. Protein content increased slightly in each culture. Microbial growth increased during the first two weeks of storage at 4 °C and then decreased on the 28th day. Sensory attributes, such as taste, texture, and overall acceptability, showed no significant differences, but aroma and appearance showed significant differences. This study showed that fermenting cowpea milk improved its nutritional quality by developing a yogurt-like product. This suggests the need for further research to enhance sensory acceptability and explore the potential health benefits through in vivo studies. Recent studies on Lactobacillus acidophilus in the fermentation of plant beverages are tabulated in Table 4. Recent research on the application of L. acidophilus in the fermentation of different food products and plant-based beverages is shown in Figure 2.

5. Safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus

Lactobacillus acidophilus is widely recognized for its safety and beneficial effects as a probiotic, particularly in the dairy industry and for human consumption. Studies have shown that L. acidophilus is a genetically stable and low-diversity species, with commercial strains essentially identical at the sequence level, indicating a high degree of safety and consistency in its use [114]. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety assessed various strains of L. acidophilus, including W37, DDS-1, La-5, and La-14, and concluded that these strains are unlikely to cause adverse health effects in a generally healthy population with a mature gastrointestinal tract. However, they noted a lack of data on long-term adverse effects in infants and young children, suggesting that prolonged daily consumption by individuals with immature gastrointestinal tracts could potentially have unknown long-term effects [115]. Further research involving healthy adult volunteers consuming high doses of L. acidophilus 821-3 demonstrated that the strain persisted in the gastrointestinal tract for several days post-consumption without causing severe adverse effects, indicating its potential as a safe probiotic [116]. The FAO/WHO guidelines emphasize the need for comprehensive safety assessments of lactic acid bacteria, including L. acidophilus, to ensure consumer safety, particularly regarding antibiotic resistance and toxin production [117]. Despite the extensive use of lactic acid bacteria in fermented foods globally, which has not shown general harm to consumer health, it is crucial to consider that no live bacteria can be guaranteed to pose zero risk, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Specific strains such as L. acidophilus BIOTECH 1900 have demonstrated strong antagonistic activity against pathogens and favorable safety profiles, including susceptibility to most antibiotics and a lack of hemolytic activity, making them suitable for probiotic use [118]. Although isolated cases of lactobacillemia have been reported in at-risk populations, the overall biological risk of L. acidophilus remains negligible, and new guidelines have proposed granting a ‘long-standing presumption of safety’ status to the Lactobacillus genus based on its historical use [119]. Additionally, the long-term use of probiotics such as L. acidophilus has shown potential benefits in modulating gut microbiota and improving metabolic health, further supporting its safe consumption [120]. Overall, the extensive body of research supports the safety of the long-term consumption of L. acidophilus, and ongoing studies are needed to address specific concerns in vulnerable populations.

6. Challenges and Opportunities

Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) presents significant challenges and promising opportunities for commercial food production. One of the primary challenges is its complex nutritional requirements and low cell density during industrial production, which restrict its broader application. Optimizing fermentation conditions, such as adjusting the carbon source and nutrient composition, has been shown to significantly enhance cell density and growth rates, as demonstrated by the increased viable counts of L. acidophilus IMAU81186 under optimized conditions [121]. Additionally, the fastidious nature of L. acidophilus in terms of its nutritional needs and sensitivity to environmental conditions, such as metal ion stress, further complicates its industrial use. Research has shown that, while certain metal ions such as Zn and Mn do not affect growth, others such as Cu can be highly toxic, necessitating the selection of stress-resistant strains or adaptation techniques to improve tolerance and productivity [122].
Despite these challenges, L. acidophilus offers numerous opportunities, particularly for sustainable food production. Its ability to ferment food enhances safety, prolongs shelf life, and augments nutritional value by producing lactic acid and bacteriocins, which inhibit foodborne pathogens and spoilage organisms [2,123]. Moreover, L. acidophilus can be utilized in the production of single-cell protein (SCP) from organic waste, providing a sustainable protein source while addressing waste management issues [124]. The probiotic properties of L. acidophilus also present significant health benefits, particularly in gastrointestinal health, as seen in products such as acidophilus milk, which has been shown to prevent various digestive tract problems and improve overall gut health [125]. Furthermore, the development of genetically modified strains, although challenging owing to regulatory and technical barriers, has the potential to enhance the functional properties and industrial applicability of L. acidophilus [126]. Studies have also shown that different strains of L. acidophilus exhibit varying degrees of resistance to antibiotics and gastrointestinal conditions, which can be leveraged to select the most suitable strains for specific applications [127,128]. The adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) approach has also been successful in increasing the acid tolerance of related strains, suggesting a potential method for improving the robustness of L. acidophilus in acidic environments, which is crucial for its application in various fermentation processes [129]. Overall, while the commercial production of L. acidophilus faces several challenges, ongoing research and technological advancements continue to unlock new opportunities, making it an invaluable asset in the food industry.

7. Conclusions

Lactobacillus acidophilus is a probiotic bacterium with several advantages for human health and technological applications in food and beverage fermentation. Some of its benefits include enhanced immunity; the promotion of gut health; and antioxidant, antitumor, and antimicrobial effects. The growth of L. acidophilus is influenced by various factors such as salinity, temperature, carbon sources, and nutrient availability, which can affect the survival and bioactive potential of fermented products. L. acidophilus also has proteolytic effects, which help break down proteins and release bioactive peptides with various health benefits. This bacterium is used in the fermentation of dairy products, cereal beverages, soymilk, fruit and vegetable juices, and other functional food preparations to improve nutritional value, taste, and probiotic delivery. To obtain the most L. acidophilus from various food products and beverages, it is essential to control the fermentation conditions. Future research should focus on enhancing their viability and probiotic characteristics through various encapsulation techniques, and in vivo studies on the synergistic use of prebiotics, which can improve the survival and functionality of the digestive system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ł.Ł.; data curation, Y.L., K.A.Q. and H.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L., H.N. and M.S.F.; writing—review and editing, M.M., A.L., K.A.Q., M.S., Ł.Ł. and U.E.H.; supervision, M.T. and Ł.Ł.; funding acquisition, Ł.Ł. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dinev, T.; Beev, G.; Denev, S.; Dermendzhieva, D.; Tzanova, M.; Valkova, E. Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms: A review. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anjum, N.; Maqsood, S.; Masud, T.; Ahmad, A.; Sohail, A.; Momin, A. Lactobacillus acidophilus: Characterization of the species and application in food production. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, S.; Minaeian, S.; Majidpour, A.; Adabi, M.; Hosseini Doust, R. The Lactobacillus acidophilus Supernatant: An Effective and Safe Alternative to Antibiotics. Iran. J. Toxicol. 2024, 18, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diniz-Silva, H.T.; Brandao, L.R.; de Sousa Galvao, M.; Madruga, M.S.; Maciel, J.F.; Leite de Souza, E.; Magnani, M. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Minas Frescal cheese made with oregano and rosemary essential oils. Food Microbiol. 2020, 86, 103348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. CoŞAnsu AkdemİR, S.; Toupal, S.; Aslan, Ö. Growth Kinetics and Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus in Black Rice Milk. Gıda 2021, 46, 1440–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meng, L.; Li, S.; Liu, G.; Fan, X.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, A.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, X.; Huang, K.; Feng, Z. The nutrient requirements of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and their application to fermented milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rianingsih, L.; Sumardianto. Antioxidant activity in seaweed (Sargassum sp.) extract fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 530, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chan, C.-L.; Gan, R.-Y.; Shah, N.P.; Corke, H. Enhancing antioxidant capacity of Lactobacillus acidophilus-fermented milk fortified with pomegranate peel extracts. Food Biosci. 2018, 26, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aween, M.M.; Hassan, Z.; Muhialdin, B.J.; Eljamel, Y.A.; Al-Mabrok, A.S.; Lani, M.N. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from honey marketed in Malaysia against selected multiple antibiotic resistant (MAR) Gram-positive bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M364–M371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gürmeriç, H.E.; Şengül, M.; Erkaya-Kotan, T. Assessment of the antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities and some quality characteristics of Kaşar cheese produced by probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 103812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Padghan, P.V.; Mann, B.; Sharma, R.; Bajaj, R.; Saini, P. Production of Angiotensin-I-Converting-Enzyme-Inhibitory Peptides in Fermented Milks (Lassi) Fermented by Lactobacillus acidophillus with Consideration of Incubation Period and Simmering Treatment. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2016, 23, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wen, J.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y. The Latest Research Progress on Application of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aung, T.; Park, S.-S.; Kim, M.-J. Influence of Lactobacillus (LAB) Fermentation on the Enhancement of Branched Chain Amino Acids and Antioxidant Properties in Bran among Wheat By-Products. Fermentation 2022, 8, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Enujiugha, V.N.; Badejo, A.A. Probiotic potentials of cereal-based beverages. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 790–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahsan, S.; Khaliq, A.; Chughtai, M.F.J.; Nadeem, M.; Tahir, A.B.; Din, A.A.; Ntsefong, G.N.; Shariati, M.A.; Rebezov, M.; Yessimbekov, Z.; et al. Technofunctional quality assessment of soymilk fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2022, 69, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guney, D.; Gungormusler, M. Development and Comparative Evaluation of a Novel Fermented Juice Mixture with Probiotic Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, T.; Wu, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhou, C.; Han, Y.; Tao, Y. Fermentation and Storage Characteristics of “Fuji” Apple Juice Using Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum: Microbial Growth, Metabolism of Bioactives and in vitro Bioactivities. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 833906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gao, H.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Hai, D.; Wei, C.; Zhang, L.; Li, P. The Functional Roles of Lactobacillus acidophilus in Different Physiological and Pathological Processes. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 32, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, K.; Xin, J.; Zhang, G.; Xie, H.; Luo, L.; Yuan, S.; Bu, Y.; Yang, X.; Ge, Y.; Liu, C. A combination of three probiotic strains for treatment of acute diarrhoea in hospitalised children: An open label, randomised controlled trial. Benef. Microbes 2020, 11, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Jiang, J.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, W. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effects of probiotics on functional constipation in adults. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 2960–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hsu, Y.C.; Huang, Y.Y.; Tsai, S.Y.; Kuo, Y.W.; Lin, J.H.; Ho, H.H.; Chen, J.F.; Hsia, K.C.; Sun, Y. Efficacy of Probiotic Supplements on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Inflammatory Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress and Cognitive Function in Patients with Alzheimer’s Dementia: A 12-Week Randomized, Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2023, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Farag, M.A.; El Hawary, E.A.; Elmassry, M.M. Rediscovering acidophilus milk, its quality characteristics, manufacturing methods, flavor chemistry and nutritional value. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3024–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, R.; Xing, H.Y.; Liu, H.J.; Chen, Z.F.; Tang, B.B. Efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Transl. Pediatr. 2021, 10, 3248–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liong, M.T.; Easa, A.M.; Lim, P.T.; Kang, J.Y. Survival, growth characteristics and bioactive potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus in a soy-based cream cheese. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1382–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Raveschot, C.; Cudennec, B.; Coutte, F.; Flahaut, C.; Fremont, M.; Drider, D.; Dhulster, P. Production of Bioactive Peptides by Lactobacillus Species: From Gene to Application. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alaqil, A.A.; Abbas, A.O.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Atty, H.K.A.; Mehaisen, G.M.K.; Moustafa, E.S. Dietary Supplementation of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus Modulates Cholesterol Levels, Immune Response, and Productive Performance of Laying Hens. Animals 2020, 10, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Kwok, L.-Y.; Cai, T.; Zhang, W. The immune regulatory role of Lactobacillus acidophilus: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, Z.; Yang, K.; Zhang, A.; Chang, W.; Zheng, A.; Chen, Z.; Cai, H.; Liu, G. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance, immune response, and intestinal barrier function of broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli O157. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nouri Gharajalar, S.; Mirzai, P.; Nofouzi, K.; Madadi, M.S. Immune enhancing effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Newcastle disease vaccination in chickens. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 101520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maria Remes Troche, J.; Coss Adame, E.; Angel Valdovinos Diaz, M.; Gomez Escudero, O.; Eugenia Icaza Chavez, M.; Antonio Chavez-Barrera, J.; Zarate Mondragon, F.; Antonio Ruiz Velarde Velasco, J.; Rafael Aceves Tavares, G.; Antonio Lira Pedrin, M.; et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus LB: A useful pharmabiotic for the treatment of digestive disorders. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2020, 13, 1756284820971201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Farid, W.; Masud, T.; Sohail, A.; Ahmad, N.; Naqvi, S.M.S.; Khan, S.; Ali, A.; Khalifa, S.A.; Hussain, A.; Ali, S.; et al. Gastrointestinal transit tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, and functional attributes of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from Indigenous Dahi. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 5092–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, H.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X.; Tian, C.; Zhong, X.; Zhao, L. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Lactobacillus acidophilus for Treating Acute Gastroenteritis in Children. Nutrients 2022, 14, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abd Elmacksood, A.; Basha, O.; Talat, D.; Ahmed, H.; Ibrahim, M. In Vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus against some pathogens. Damanhour J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 6, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Karska-Wysocki, B.; Bazo, M.; Smoragiewicz, W. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abd-Allah, D.A.; Sotohy, S.; Hassan, E.A.; Mwafy, A. Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus against some pathogenic bacteria. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 2024, 70, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Celebi, O.; Taghizadehghalehjoughi, A.; Celebi, D.; Mesnage, R.; Golokhvast, K.S.; Arsene, A.L.; Spandidos, D.A.; Tsatsakis, A. Effect of the combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus (probiotic) with vitamin K3 and vitamin E on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus: An in vitro pathogen model. Mol. Med. Rep. 2023, 27, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Onur, E.; Gokmen, G.G.; Nalbantsoy, A.; Kisla, D. Investigation of the supportive therapy potential of propolis extract and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 milk combination against breast cancer in mice. Cytokine 2022, 149, 155743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khedr, O.M.S.; El-Sonbaty, S.M.; Moawed, F.S.M.; Kandil, E.I.; Abdel-Maksoud, B.E. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 Exopolysaccharides Suppresses Mediators of Inflammation through the Inhibition of TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK Pathway in DEN-Induced Hepatocarcinogenesis in Rats. Nutr. Cancer 2022, 74, 1037–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yue, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, J.; Xie, Q.; Li, N.; Guan, J.; Evivie, S.E.; Liu, F.; Li, B.; Huo, G. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus KLDS1.0901 on Proliferation and Apoptosis of Colon Cancer Cells. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 788040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, Y.; Zhang, T.; Gao, J.; Jiang, X.; Tao, M.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Z.; Pan, D. Lactobacillus acidophilus CICC 6074 inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in HT-29 cells induced-mouse model. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 75, 104290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Asfour, A.; Bhardwaj, R.G.; Karched, M. Growth Suppression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int. Dent. J. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baghbani-Arani, F.; Asgary, V.; Hashemi, A. Cell-free extracts of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii display antiproliferative and antioxidant activities against HT-29 cell line. Nutr. Cancer 2020, 72, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ansari, F.; Pourjafar, H.; Bahadori, M.B.; Pimentel, T.C. Effect of Microencapsulation on the Development of Antioxidant Activity and Viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 in Whey Drink During Fermentation. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 11, 9762–9771. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moura, C.S.; Lollo, P.C.B.; Morato, P.N.; Esmerino, E.A.; Margalho, L.P.; Santos-Junior, V.A.; Coimbra, P.T.; Cappato, L.P.; Silva, M.C.; Garcia-Gomes, A.S.; et al. Assessment of antioxidant activity, lipid profile, general biochemical and immune system responses of Wistar rats fed with dairy dessert containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5. Food Res. Int. 2016, 90, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nada, H.G.; Sudha, T.; Darwish, N.H.E.; Mousa, S.A. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum exhibit antiproliferation, anti-angiogenesis of gastric and bladder cancer: Impact of COX2 inhibition. PharmaNutrition 2020, 14, 100219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taha, S.; El Abd, M.; De Gobba, C.; Abdel-Hamid, M.; Khalil, E.; Hassan, D. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of bioactive peptides in buffalo’s yoghurt fermented with different starter cultures. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Okon, A.; Stadnik, J.; Dolatowski, Z.J. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus Bauer and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB12 on proteolytic changes in dry-cured loins. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. da Silva, B.S.; Díaz-Roa, A.; Yamane, E.S.; Hayashi, M.A.F.; Silva Junior, P.I. Doderlin: Isolation and characterization of a broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptide from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Res. Microbiol. 2023, 174, 103995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hayes, M.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Hill, C.; Stanton, C. Casein-derived antimicrobial peptides generated by Lactobacillus acidophilus DPC6026. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 2260–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ha, G.E.; Chang, O.K.; Han, G.S.; Ham, J.S.; Park, B.Y.; Jeong, S.G. Comparison of Antioxidant Activities of Hydrolysates of Domestic and Imported Skim Milk Powders Treated with Papain. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2015, 35, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qureshi, T.M.; Vegarud, G.E.; Abrahamsen, R.K.; Skeie, S. Characterization of the Norwegian autochthonous cheese Gamalost and its angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity during ripening. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2012, 92, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sedaghati, M.; Ezzatpanah, H.; Mashhadiakbar Boojar, M.; Tajabadi Ebrahimi, M.; Aminafshar, M. Plasmin-digest of β-lactoglobulin with antibacterial properties. Food Agric. Immunol. 2014, 26, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Modiri, S.; Kasra Kermanshahi, R.; Reza Soudi, M.; Dad, N.; Ebadi, M.; Shahbani Zahiri, H.; Akbari Noghabi, K. Growth Optimization of Lactobacillus acidophilus for Production of Antimicrobial Peptide Acidocin 4356: Scale up from Flask to Lab-Scale Fermenter. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, e2686. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, H.; Niu, Y.; Pan, J.; Li, Q.; Lu, R. Antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus surface-layer protein in combination with nisin against Staphylococcus aureus. LWT 2020, 124, 109208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meng, F.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, H.; Nie, T.; Lu, F.; Lu, Z.; Lu, Y. A class III bacteriocin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity from Lactobacillus acidophilus NX2-6 and its preservation in milk and cheese. Food Control 2021, 121, 107597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, J.-J.; Yang, L.-C.; Liu, Y.-C. Production, purification, and structural characteristics of extracellular polysaccharides derived from Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022, 137, 104189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Guo, H.; Cheng, Q.; Abbas, Z.; Tong, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wei, X.; et al. Optimization of Exopolysaccharide Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum R301 and Its Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Foods 2023, 12, 2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Deepak, V.; Ram Kumar Pandian, S.; Sivasubramaniam, S.D.; Nellaiah, H.; Sundar, K. Optimization of anticancer exopolysaccharide production from probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus by response surface methodology. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 46, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abedfar, A.; Abbaszadeh, S.; Hosseininezhad, M.; Taghdir, M. Physicochemical and biological characterization of the EPS produced by L. acidophilus isolated from rice bran sourdough. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 127, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lopes, L.A.A.; Pimentel, T.C.; Carvalho, R.S.F.; Madruga, M.S.; Galvao, M.S.; Bezerra, T.K.A.; Barao, C.E.; Magnani, M.; Stamford, T.C.M. Spreadable goat Ricotta cheese added with Lactobacillus acidophilus La-05: Can microencapsulation improve the probiotic survival and the quality parameters? Food Chem. 2021, 346, 128769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mojaddar Langroodi, A.; Mehdizadeh, T.; Majidi, L.; Neyriz-Naghadehi, M. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Anethum graveolens essential oil in Iranian cheese against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Flavour Fragr. J. 2020, 36, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lopes Neto, J.H.P.; Santos, M.C.G.d.; Leite, K.S.; Silva, L.A.d.; Campos, M.I.F.; Silveira, E.S.d.; Amaral, J.B.S.; Madruga, M.S.; Braga, A.L.M.; Cardarelli, H.R. Development and characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-3) microparticles with reducing substances and its addition to Reino cheese. LWT 2021, 143, 111083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mosallaie, F.; Jooyandeh, H.; Hojjati, M.; Fazlara, A. Biological reduction of aflatoxin B1 in yogurt by probiotic strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Özhamamci, İ.; Cheraghi, K.S.; Ilgaz, Ş.; Gülçin, İ.; Polat, A.; Çakiroğlu, K.; Öz, E.; Çakmakçi, S. Lactobacillus acidophilus ve Yeşil Çay Pudrası ile Üretilen Yoğurtların Probiyotik Raf Ömrü, Antioksidan, Duyusal, Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özellikleri. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2019, 25, 673–682. [Google Scholar]
  65. Masoumi, S.J.; Mehrabani, D.; Saberifiroozi, M.; Fattahi, M.R.; Moradi, F.; Najafi, M. The effect of yogurt fortified with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium sp. probiotic in patients with lactose intolerance. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 1704–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hussien, H.; Abd-Rabou, H.S.; Saad, M.A. The impact of incorporating Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteriocin with inulin and FOS on yogurt quality. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mousavi, M.; Heshmati, A.; Garmakhany, A.D.; Vahidinia, A.; Taheri, M. Optimization of the viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus and physico-chemical, textural and sensorial characteristics of flaxseed-enriched stirred probiotic yogurt by using response surface methodology. LWT 2019, 102, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hasani, S.; Sari, A.A.; Heshmati, A.; Karami, M. Physicochemical and sensory attributes assessment of functional low-fat yogurt produced by incorporation of barley bran and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ertem, H.; Çakmakçı, S. Shelf life and quality of probiotic yogurt produced with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Gobdin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 53, 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dabaj, F.K.; Lasekan, O.; Manap, M.Y.A.; Ling, F.H. Evaluation of the volatilomic potentials of the Lactobacillus casei 431 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 in fermented milk. CyTA-J. Food 2020, 18, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Elshaghabee, F.M.F.; Abd El-Maksoud, A.A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Alfarraj, S.; Mohamed, M.S.M. Fortification of acidophilus-bifidus-thermophilus (ABT) Fermented Milk with Heat-Treated Industrial Yeast Enhances Its Selected Properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, S.; Ma, C.; Gong, G.; Liu, Z.; Chang, C.; Xu, Z. The impact of onion juice on milk fermentation by Lactobacillus acidophilus. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 65, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abdollahzadeh, S.M.; Zahedani, M.R.; Rahmdel, S.; Hemmati, F.; Mazloomi, S.M. Development of Lactobacillus acidophilus-fermented milk fortified with date extract. LWT 2018, 98, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Islam, M.Z.; Akhter, S.; Liza, R.I.; Sojib, M.S.I.; Hasan, M.S.; Habib, R.; Harun-ur-Rashid, M. Using β-galactosidase and Novel Probiotic Strains to Formulate Lactose-Free Acidophilus Milk Fortified with Cocoa Powder. Res. Sq. 2022, accepted. [Google Scholar]
  75. Elkot, W.F.; Ateteallah, A.H.; Al-Moalem, M.H.; Shahein, M.R.; Alblihed, M.A.; Abdo, W.; Elmahallawy, E.K. Functional, Physicochemical, Rheological, Microbiological, and Organoleptic Properties of Synbiotic Ice Cream Produced from Camel Milk Using Black Rice Powder and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5. Fermentation 2022, 8, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Arief, I.I.; Afiyah, D.N.; Wulandari, Z.; Budiman, C. Physicochemical Properties, Fatty Acid Profiles, and Sensory Characteristics of Fermented Beef Sausage by Probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum IIA-2C12 or Lactobacillus acidophilus IIA-2B4. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, M2761–M2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Segli, F.; Melian, C.; Vignolo, G.; Castellano, P. Inhibition of a spoilage exopolysaccharide producer by bioprotective extracts from Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL641 and Latilactobacillus curvatus CRL705 in vacuum-packaged refrigerated meat discs. Meat Sci. 2021, 178, 108509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Agrawal, N.; Singh, P.K.; Yadav, S.; Gupta, S.; Garg, A.; Singh, R.; Gupta, B.; Shukla, S. Sensory characteristics of developed probiotic chicken meat spread fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2024, 8, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Razavizadeh, S.; Alencikiene, G.; Salaseviciene, A.; Vaiciulyte-Funk, L.; Ertbjerg, P.; Zabulione, A. Impact of fermentation of okara on physicochemical, techno-functional, and sensory properties of meat analogues. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 2379–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Segli, F.; Melian, C.; Munoz, V.; Vignolo, G.; Castellano, P. Bioprotective extracts from Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL641 and Latilactobacillus curvatus CRL705 inhibit a spoilage exopolysaccharide producer in a refrigerated meat system. Food Microbiol. 2021, 97, 103739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hadidi, M.; Majidiyan, N.; Jelyani, A.Z.; Moreno, A.; Hadian, Z.; Mousavi Khanegah, A. Alginate/Fish Gelatin-Encapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus: A Study on Viability and Technological Quality of Bread during Baking and Storage. Foods 2021, 10, 2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Duc Thang, T.; Hanh Quyen, L.T.; Thuy Hang, H.T.; Thien Luan, N.; KimThuy, D.T.; Lieu, D.M. Survival Survey of Lactobacillus acidophilus In Additional Probiotic Bread. Turk. J. Agric.-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 7, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mirzamani, S.S.; Bassiri, A.R.; Tavakolipour, H.; Azizi, M.H.; Kargozari, M. Survival of fluidized bed encapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus under simulated gastro-intestinal conditions and heat treatment during bread baking. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 5477–5484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maciel, G.M.; Chaves, K.S.; Grosso, C.R.; Gigante, M.L. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 by spray-drying using sweet whey and skim milk as encapsulating materials. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 1991–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jiang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, T.; Hendricks, G.; Guo, M. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM using polymerized whey proteins as wall material. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 67, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pandey, A.; Srivastava, S.; Rai, P.; Duke, M. Cheese whey to biohydrogen and useful organic acids: A non-pathogenic microbial treatment by L. acidophilus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ribeiro, M.C.E.; Chaves, K.S.; Gebara, C.; Infante, F.N.S.; Grosso, C.R.F.; Gigante, M.L. Effect of microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 on physicochemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of stirred probiotic yoghurt. Food Res. Int. 2014, 66, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Šiler, B.T.; Ribeiro, E.S.S.; Damasceno, K.S.F.S.C.; Dantas, L.M.d.C.; Azevedo, W.M.d.; Leite, P.I.P.; Assis, C.F.d.; Sousa Junior, F.C.d. Fermented yellow mombin juice using Lactobacillus acidophilus NRRL B-4495: Chemical composition, bioactive properties and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239392. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mashitoa, F.M.; Akinola, S.A.; Manhevi, V.E.; Garcia, C.; Remize, F.; Slabbert, R.M.; Sivakumar, D. Influence of Fermentation of Pasteurised Papaya Puree with Different Lactic Acid Bacterial Strains on Quality and Bioaccessibility of Phenolic Compounds during In Vitro Digestion. Foods 2021, 10, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, X.; Gao, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Wang, X.; Caprioli, G.; Mi, S.; Sang, Y. Effect of fermentation by Lactobacillus acidophilus CH-2 on the enzymatic browning of pear juice. LWT 2021, 147, 111489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Peng, W.; Meng, D.; Yue, T.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Z. Effect of the apple cultivar on cloudy apple juice fermented by a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus fermentum. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 127922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Karbasi, M.; Yarmand, M.S.; Mousavi, M. Fermentation Potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus acidophilus in Date Syrup to Develop a Functional Fermented Beverage: A Comparative Study. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sheng, J.; Shan, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, J.; Cai, W.; Tang, F. Comparative evaluation of the quality of red globe grape juice fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 2235–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Xu, H.; Feng, L.; Deng, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Lin, L.; Liang, M.; Jia, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; et al. Change of phytochemicals and bioactive substances in Lactobacillus fermented Citrus juice during the fermentation process. LWT 2023, 180, 114715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sharma, R.; Garg, P.; Kumar, P.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kulshrestha, S. Microbial Fermentation and Its Role in Quality Improvement of Fermented Foods. Fermentation 2020, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rosend, J.; Kaleda, A.; Kuldjarv, R.; Arju, G.; Nisamedtinov, I. The Effect of Apple Juice Concentration on Cider Fermentation and Properties of the Final Product. Foods 2020, 9, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Song, X.; Hu, X.; He, Y.; Yin, J.; Nie, S.; Xie, M. Changes in volatile and nutrient components of mango juice by different Lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shen, Y.; Sun, H.; Zeng, H.; Prinyawiwatukul, W.; Xu, W.; Xu, Z. Increases in Phenolic, Fatty Acid, and Phytosterol Contents and Anticancer Activities of Sweet Potato after Fermentation by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2735–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lavinia, B.C.; Manea, I.; Bratu, M.G.; Avram, D.; Nicolescu, C.L. Evaluation of the cabbage and cucumber juices as substrate for Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 17, 7418–7429. [Google Scholar]
  100. Tenguria, M.; Golhani, P.; Joshi, P.D.; Bais, R.T.; Chansoria, A. In vitro exploration on deviation in certain physico-chemical properties of daucus carota juice supplemented with probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus. Asian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2019, 8, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Srisuk, N.; Nopharatana, M.; Jirasatid, S. Co-encapsulation of Dictyophora indusiata to improve Lactobacillus acidophilus survival and its effect on quality of sweet fermented rice (Khoa-Mak) sap beverage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 3598–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Igwebuike, J.I.; Barber, L.I.; Obinna-Echem, P.C. Quality Characteristics of Probiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus) Beverage from Hydrolyzed Tigernut Milk Supplemented with Beetroot Juice. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 10, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  103. Boudjou, S.; Zaidi, F.; Hosseinian, F.; Oomah, B.D. Effects of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Flour on Viability of Probiotic Bacteria During Kefir Storage. J. Food Res. 2014, 3, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ziarno, M.; Brys, J.; Parzyszek, M.; Veber, A. Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Lipid Profile of Bean-Based Plant Substitute of Fermented Milk. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cichonska, P.; Ziarno, M. Legumes and Legume-Based Beverages Fermented with Lactic Acid Bacteria as a Potential Carrier of Probiotics and Prebiotics. Microorganisms 2021, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Martineau-Cote, D.; Achouri, A.; Karboune, S.; L’Hocine, L. Faba Bean: An Untapped Source of Quality Plant Proteins and Bioactives. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tangyu, M.; Fritz, M.; Tan, J.P.; Ye, L.; Bolten, C.J.; Bogicevic, B.; Wittmann, C. Flavour by design: Food-grade lactic acid bacteria improve the volatile aroma spectrum of oat milk, sunflower seed milk, pea milk, and faba milk towards improved flavour and sensory perception. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Aduol, K.O.; Onyango, A.N.; Imathiu, S.M. Proximate, microbial and sensory characteristics of cowpea milk fermented with probiotic starter cultures. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci. 2020, 2, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Parra, K.; Ferrer, M.; Pinero, M.; Barboza, Y.; Medina, L.M. Use of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei for a potential probiotic legume-based fermented product using pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Angelica Andrade Lopes, L.; de Siqueira Ferraz Carvalho, R.; Stela Santos Magalhaes, N.; Suely Madruga, M.; Julia Alves Aguiar Athayde, A.; Araujo Portela, I.; Eduardo Barao, C.; Colombo Pimentel, T.; Magnani, M.; Christina Montenegro Stamford, T. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-05 and incorporation in vegan milks: Physicochemical characteristics and survival during storage, exposure to stress conditions, and simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Res. Int. 2020, 135, 109295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Marques da Silva, T.; Sonza Pinto, V.; Ramires Fonseca Soares, V.; Marotz, D.; Cichoski, A.J.; Queiroz Zepka, L.; Jacob Lopes, E.; de Bona da Silva, C.; de Menezes, C.R. Viability of microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus by complex coacervation associated with enzymatic crosslinking under application in different fruit juices. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hashemi, S.M.B.; Jafarpour, D.; Jouki, M. Improving bioactive properties of peach juice using Lactobacillus strains fermentation: Antagonistic and anti-adhesion effects, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and Maillard reaction inhibition. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Meng, F.-B.; Lei, Y.-T.; Li, Q.-Z.; Li, Y.-C.; Deng, Y.; Liu, D.-Y. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation on antioxidant activity and metabolomic profiles of loquat juice. LWT 2022, 171, 114104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bull, M.J.; Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Aerts, M.; Vandamme, P.; Maiden, M.C.; Marchesi, J.R.; Mahenthiralingam, E. The domestication of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wasteson, Y.; Vold, L.; Skjerve, E.; Skjerdal, O.T.; Rosnes, J.T.; Robertson, L.; Nesbakken, T.; Narvhus, J.; Lassen, J.; Kapperud, G.; et al. Risk Assessment of Specific Strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus Used as “Other Substances”. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf. 2019, 16, 110–111. [Google Scholar]
  116. Hutt, P.; Koll, P.; Stsepetova, J.; Alvarez, B.; Mandar, R.; Krogh-Andersen, K.; Marcotte, H.; Hammarstrom, L.; Mikelsaar, M. Safety and persistence of orally administered human Lactobacillus sp. strains in healthy adults. Benef. Microbes 2011, 2, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, J.F.; Hsia, K.C.; Kuo, Y.W.; Chen, S.H.; Huang, Y.Y.; Li, C.M.; Hsu, Y.C.; Tsai, S.Y.; Ho, H.H. Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, and Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66. Nutrients 2023, 16, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Malilay, J.K.; Oliveros, M.C.; Bautista, J.A.; Castillo-Israel, K.A. Functional, safety and technological properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus BIOTECH 1900. Philipp. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2019, 45, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  119. Bernardeau, M.; Guguen, M.; Vernoux, J.P. Beneficial lactobacilli in food and feed: Long-term use, biodiversity and proposals for specific and realistic safety assessments. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 487–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bang, W.Y.; Chae, S.A.; Ban, O.H.; Oh, S.; Park, C.; Lee, M.; Shin, M.; Yang, J.; Jung, Y.H. The in vitro and in vivo Safety Evaluation of Lactobacillus acidophilus IDCC 3302. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 49, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Su, X.; Menghe, B.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W. In Vitro Evaluation of Intestinal Transport and High-Density Fermentation of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Metabolites 2023, 13, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Mrvcic, J.; Butorac, A.; Solic, E.; Stanzer, D.; Bacun-Druzina, V.; Cindric, M.; Stehlik-Tomas, V. Characterization of Lactobacillus brevis L62 strain, highly tolerant to copper ions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rachwał, K.; Gustaw, K. Lactic Acid Bacteria in Sustainable Food Production. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Waoo, A.A.; Dixit, S. Production and Immobilization of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Fruit Wastes Containing Media as Probiotics. Biol. Sci. 2018, 2, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  125. Morya, S.; Awuchi, C.G.; Neumann, A.; Napoles, J.; Kumar, D. Advancement in Acidophilus Milk Production Technology; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kajikawa, A.; Zhang, L.; LaVoy, A.; Bumgardner, S.; Klaenhammer, T.R.; Dean, G.A. Mucosal Immunogenicity of Genetically Modified Lactobacillus acidophilus Expressing an HIV-1 Epitope within the Surface Layer Protein. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gibson, G.R.; McCartney, A.L.; Rastall, R.A. Prebiotics and resistance to gastrointestinal infections. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 93 (Suppl. S1), S31–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Kazmierczak-Siedlecka, K.; Roviello, G.; Catalano, M.; Polom, K. Gut Microbiota Modulation in the Context of Immune-Related Aspects of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, G.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, X.; Wang, B.; Yang, X. Recent progress in adaptive laboratory evolution of industrial microorganisms. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 50, kuac023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Health-promoting effects of L. acidophilus on disease prevention, immunity enhancement, gut wellness, and bioactivity of potential components.
Figure 1. Health-promoting effects of L. acidophilus on disease prevention, immunity enhancement, gut wellness, and bioactivity of potential components.
Fermentation 10 00380 g001
Figure 2. Application of L. acidophilus in the fermentation of different food products and plant-based beverages.
Figure 2. Application of L. acidophilus in the fermentation of different food products and plant-based beverages.
Fermentation 10 00380 g002
Table 1. Antioxidant and antitumor properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus.
Table 1. Antioxidant and antitumor properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus.
StrainPropertiesSubjectsFindingsReferences
ATCC 43121Antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and antioxidant effectsHT-29 cell lineIntrinsic pathway-dependent apoptosis was induced. Cell viability was significantly reduced to 42.2 ± 0.01% and 19.40 ± 0.01% by 5 and 8 mg ml−1[42]
LA-5Antioxidant activityWistar ratsImprove the antioxidant defenses[44]
LA-5Antitumor effectsMouse xenograft breast cancer modelInhibited the tumor volumes by 59.16%, 28.29%, and 63.39%. Acidophilus milk and PE combination significantly enhanced the ConA-, LPS-, and PHA-induced splenocyte proliferation[37]
LAAntiproliferation and anti-angiogenesis propertiesGastric
(AGS) and bladder (J253) cancer cell lines
Downregulated COX2 expression in AGS by 70 % and 95 %; antiproliferation and anti-angiogenesis of LA against gastric cancer by downregulating COX2 expression[45]
ATCC 4356Immunomodulatory and antitumor activitiesRatsATCC 4356 exopolysaccharides suppress mediators of inflammation through the inhibition of TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway[38]
CICC 6074Anti-cancer effectHT-29 cells induced-mouse modelCICC 6074 induced colon cancer apoptosis by up-regulating Bax, down-regulating Bcl-2,
releasing Cyt c from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm, and activating Caspase-3 and Caspase-9
[40]
KLDS1.0901Anti-cancer effectColon cancer cells (HT-29, Caco-2, and IEC-6 cells)Inhibited the proliferation of HT-29 and Caco-2 cells, reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential of HT-29 cells[39]
ATCC 4356Anti-cancer effectOral squamous cell carcinoma cells (HNO97 cell line)Exhibits antiproliferative activity against OSCC cells possibly partially via a TRAIL-induced mechanism of apoptosis[41]
Table 2. Functional bioactive peptides produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus.
Table 2. Functional bioactive peptides produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus.
StrainBioactive PeptidesFood SystemBioactivitiesReferences
NCDC-15KVLPVPQK (β-CN f169–176)
YQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV (β-CN f193–209)
Fermented milksAngiotensin-I-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory peptides[11]
DPC6026IKHQGLPQE, VLNENLLR, and SDIPNPIGSENSEBovine αs1-caseinAntibacterial activity against pathogenic strains Enterobacter sakazakii ATCC 12,868 and Escherichia coli DPC5063[49]
LA-5GVSKVKEAMAPKBovine β-CNAntioxidant[50]
LA-5DVENLHLPLPLBovine β-CNACE-inhibitory activity[51]
LA-5GLDIQKVAGT, GLDIQKVAGTWBovine β-LGACE-inhibitory activity, antibacterial activity[52]
LANEPTHLLKAFSKAGFQMilk, yogurt, cheeses Antimicrobial activity [48]
LAAcidocin 4356WheyAntimicrobial activity[53]
CGMCC1.1878SLPSYogurtInhibited Staphylococcus aureus growth[54]
ATCC
4356
SLAKasar cheeseIncreased the bioactivity of the cheese[10]
NX371CAAATCAGTAATATGGAAAATCMilk and cheeseDamaged the cell wall, and disrupted the membrane structure, resulting in leakage of intracellular ATP.[55]
Table 3. Overview of Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation for the development of food products.
Table 3. Overview of Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation for the development of food products.
StrainsFermentation
Temperature and Time
Food
Products
FindingsReferences
LA-5At 22 °C for 18 hMilk productsUsed as a bacterial supplement in fermented products [84]
LA-5At 37 °C for 15 hSweet whey and skim milkSkim milk microparticles allowed an increase in the viability of the probiotic[84]
LA-5At 37 °C for 8 hFermented milkRegulated the growth of probiotics in fermented milk prepared by a single probiotic strain[6]
LA-5At 37 °C for 48 hYogurtThe addition of microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 improved the physiochemical properties of the yogurts[85]
ATCC 4356At 42 °C for 4 hLow-fat yogurtHigh levels of barley bran (1.2%) decreased sensory prosperity scores and led to a viscosity increment; the amount of L. acidophilus and viscosity in samples containing barley bran was significantly higher than the control group[68]
ATCC 4356At 37 °C for 18 hCheese wheyThe production of valuable organic acids including pyruvate, propionate, acetate, lactate, formate, and butyrate [86]
LA-3At 37 ◦C for 18 hReino cheeseShowed the highest lactobacilli viability (8.49 ± 0.08 Log CFU/g), provided additional protection to the L. acidophilus microorganism, benefiting microbial cell survival, and therefore resulted in a ripened Reino cheese[62]
LA-308At 37 °C for 24 hMeat analogsImproved water-holding capacity and sensory properties of meat analogs, as well as reducing hardness and protein oxidation levels[79]
CRL641At 37 °C for 24 hRefrigerated meatInhibited Latilactobacillus sakei CRL1407; improved sensorial effects of both extracts[87]
LA-5At 37 °C for 24 hChicken meat spreadShowed positive effects on its sensory attributes, resulting in an appreciable-quality probiotic chicken meat spread[78]
IIA-2B4At room temperature for 24 hFermented beef sausageThe development of unique flavor compounds including acid, alcohols, aldehydes, aromatics, ketones, sulfur, hydrocarbons, and terpenes[76]
ATCC 4356At 37 ◦C for 24 hProbiotic breadThe combination of maltodextrin and xanthan gum in the alginate matrix provides the best survivability during storage[82]
LA-5At 37 ◦C for 24 hBreadThe application of alginate and chitosan in the microcapsules can protect the L. acidophillus and it is considered as an effective method in probiotic bread production[83]
Table 4. Recent studies on Lactobacillus acidophilus in the fermentation of plant beverages.
Table 4. Recent studies on Lactobacillus acidophilus in the fermentation of plant beverages.
StrainsFermentation Temperature and TimePlant
Beverage
FindingsReferences
ATCC 314At 37 °C for 12 hPigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) productHigher viability and good sensory attributes; it should be considered suitable for a pigeon pea-based fermented probiotic product[109]
La-05At 37 °C for 24 hIncorporation in vegan milksThe utilization of chitosan coating in the alginate microparticle is recommended only for increasing the survival of the probiotic cultures in vegan milks[110]
LA-02At 37 °C for 17 hDifferent fruit juicesIn apple juice, there is an increase in probiotic viability. In orange juice, microencapsulation also showed satisfactory results, as only microencapsulated probiotics were able to survive for 63 days, showing high viability[111]
PTCC 1643At 37 °C for 24 hPeach juiceThe biological activities of peach juice including Maillard reaction inhibition, superoxide anion radical-scavenging activity, Fe-reducing power, and anti-inflammatory activity were markedly increased during the fermentation period[112]
CH-2At 37 °C for 24 hPear juiceMetabolites were produced with strong antioxidant activity via the fermentation by L. acidophilus CH-2 for the degradation of browning products by fermentation[90]
CICC®20709At 36 °C for 24 hLoquat juiceSignificantly enhanced the antioxidant activity of loquat juice[113]
LA-26At 36 °C for 24 hGrape juiceBetter tastes, such as sourness, and aromas but also decreased the amount of bitterness and levels of sulfur compounds[93]
LA-20079At 37 °C for 48 hFermented beverageHighest pH decreases and sugar consumption showed a much better growth rate[92]
TISTR 2365At 36 °C for 24 hFermented rice (khoa mak) sap beverageSignificant increase in total phenolic contents and DPPH radical scavenging activities[101]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Nawazish, H.; Farid, M.S.; Abdul Qadoos, K.; Habiba, U.E.; Muzamil, M.; Tanveer, M.; Sienkiewicz, M.; Lichota, A.; Łopusiewicz, Ł. Health-Promoting Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Technological Applications in Fermented Food Products and Beverages. Fermentation 2024, 10, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080380

AMA Style

Liu Y, Nawazish H, Farid MS, Abdul Qadoos K, Habiba UE, Muzamil M, Tanveer M, Sienkiewicz M, Lichota A, Łopusiewicz Ł. Health-Promoting Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Technological Applications in Fermented Food Products and Beverages. Fermentation. 2024; 10(8):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yanyan, Hira Nawazish, Muhammad Salman Farid, Khansa Abdul Qadoos, Umm E. Habiba, Muhammad Muzamil, Mahwish Tanveer, Monika Sienkiewicz, Anna Lichota, and Łukasz Łopusiewicz. 2024. "Health-Promoting Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Technological Applications in Fermented Food Products and Beverages" Fermentation 10, no. 8: 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080380

APA Style

Liu, Y., Nawazish, H., Farid, M. S., Abdul Qadoos, K., Habiba, U. E., Muzamil, M., Tanveer, M., Sienkiewicz, M., Lichota, A., & Łopusiewicz, Ł. (2024). Health-Promoting Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Technological Applications in Fermented Food Products and Beverages. Fermentation, 10(8), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop