Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Carbon Nanodots Synthesized from Dunaliella salina as Sun Protection Filters
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Mechanisms of Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Growth: Kinetics versus Thermodynamics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
C
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/c6040068
carbon-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrochemical Aspects of a Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphitic Carbon Material: Resistance to Electrode Fouling by Air-Aging and Dopamine Electro-Oxidation

by
Kailash Hamal
1,
Jeremy May
1,
Haoyu Zhu
2,
Forrest Dalbec
1,
Elena Echeverria
3,
David N. McIlroy
3,
Eric Aston
4 and
I. Francis Cheng
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Boise State University, MEC 403D, 1910, Boise, ID 83725, USA
3
Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, 145 Physical Sciences Building, Stillwater, OK 74028, USA
4
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
C 2020, 6(4), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/c6040068
Submission received: 30 September 2020 / Revised: 19 October 2020 / Accepted: 24 October 2020 / Published: 27 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in the Science and Engineering of Carbons)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nitrogen-doped form of GUITAR (pseudo-Graphite from the University of Idaho Thermalized Asphalt Reaction) was examined by X-ray photoelectron, Raman, and X-ray diffraction spectroscopies and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Electrochemical studies indicate that N-GUITAR exhibits significant resistance to fouling by adsorption and by passivation. Unlike other carbon materials, it maintains fast heterogenous electron transfer (HET) kinetics with Fe(CN)63−/4− with exposure to air. The CV peak potential separation (ΔEp) of 66 mV increased to 69 mV in 3 h vs. 67 to 221 mV for a highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) electrode. Water contact angle measurements indicate that N-GUITAR was able to better maintain a hydrophilic state during the 3-h exposure, going from 55.8 to 70.4° while HOPG increased from 63.8 to 80.1°. This indicates that N-GUITAR better resisted adsorption of volatile organic compounds. CV studies of dopamine also indicate N-GUITAR is resistant to passivation. The ΔEp for the dopamine/o-dopaminoquinone couple is 83 mV indicating fast HET rates. This is reflected in the peak current ratios for the oxidation and reduction processes of 1.3 indicating that o-dopaminoquinone is not lost to passivation processes. This ratio along with the minimal signal attenuation is the best reported in literature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

GUITAR (pseudo-Graphite from the University of Idaho Thermalized Asphalt Reaction) is a nanocrystalline graphite-like hydrogenated amorphous carbon (85% sp2 and 15% sp3 carbon) described in detail in recent publications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. It has morphological features similar to classical graphites but has divergent chemical and physical properties. Most prominent among these is that GUITAR has fast heterogeneous electron transfer (HET) rates at its basal plane. The defect-rich nature of GUITAR results in a high density of electronic states (DOS) near its Fermi-level. Graphitic materials have a low DOS or they are subject to air-aging, either effect creates sluggish HET kinetics [8,9,10,11]. Another feature is the resistance to corrosion that surpasses graphitic materials by 3 orders of magnitude in corrosion currents, and surpasses the potential windows of graphitic materials by 1 V [1,2]. In these respects it equals sp3 carbon electrodes. In summary, it has the best combination of fast HET and high corrosion resistance of any electrode [1]. Recent studies have indicated that introduction of nitrogen impurities within the carbon lattice significantly increases DOS thus improving HET rates [12,13,14]. This effect (not yet examined on GUITAR) has been used to improve electrochemical sensor performance, oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts in fuel cells, batteries, and ultracapacitors [12].
Electrode fouling is the process by which current signal attenuation occurs when sample matrix components undergo either passive adsorption or by redox processes which forms a polymeric film on the surface [11,15,16,17,18]. Both create a barrier to electron transfer. Recent studies indicate that fouling process of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite electrodes (HOPG) when exposed to laboratory air is through adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which decrease HET rates with the Fe(CN)63−/4− redox probe [11,15]. The important biologic analyte, dopamine undergoes electron transfer that gives rise to a cascade of reactions that result in an insulating layer of polydopamine [18,19]. There is a constant search for electrodes that exhibit minimized fouling characteristics. Such materials will find eventual use in long-term sensors and implantable electrodes for in-vivo analyses and bionics [20,21,22]. For this investigation we synthesized, characterized and examine nitrogen-doped GUITAR (N-GUITAR) electrodes for its HET rates, resistance to corrosion and fouling by air-aging and with dopamine voltammetry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

The reagents consisted of N2(g) (>99.5%, Oxarc, WA, USA), acetonitrile (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA), dopamine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Potassium monophosphate (99.6%), potassium diphosphate (99.8%), potassium chloride (99.7%) (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, NJ, USA) and potassium ferricyanide (Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA). All were used as received. The quartz tube was obtained from Technical Glass products, Inc. (Painesville Township, OH, USA), cut into small wafers (~2 cm × 0.5 cm) and used as deposition substrate.

2.2. Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphite (N-GUITAR)

N-GUITAR samples were prepared via a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. This apparatus is shown in Figure 1. The target substrate was loaded into a quartz boat and the tube furnace was heated to 900 °C with N2 gas for 10 min prior to addition of acetonitrile vapor. This system was sealed with ceramic wool to minimize air back flow. Deposition commenced by stopping the N2 flow and allowing the passage of acetonitrile vapor from a round bottom flask at >80 °C for 25 min. The N2 flow is resumed and tube furnace was cooled to room temperature before coated sample were removed.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

These images were recorded with a FEI Teneo field emission microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 2 kV, a spot size of 25–50 pA, with a secondary electron detector. Peeled HOPG thin sheet, GUITAR and N-GUITAR flakes were attached to a mounting disk with double-sided carbon tape.

2.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Spectra were recorded at Oklahoma State University in a custom-built vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 5 × 10−9 torr. Measurements were acquired with the Al Kα emission line (1486.6 eV) and a hemispherical energy analyzer with a resolution of 25 meV. Spectra were acquired at room temperature. Deconvolved C1s and N1s XPS peaks were fitted to gaussian curves with Shirley background subtraction and with the full width at half maximum kept constant.

2.5. Raman

The Raman spectra was collected using a WITec™ alpha300 R Raman instrument (Ulm, Germany), UHT-300 spectrometer with an Andor™ DU970N-BV CCD detector. The excitation source was a 532.5 nm, 100-mW frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser.

2.6. Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD was conducted on a Siemens D5000 Diffractometer (Germany). The spectra were taken with Cu K-alpha radiation (0.154 nm) at 40 kV and 30 mA in the range of 2θ = 2–80° and step size of 0.05° at room temperature.

2.7. Water Contact Angle Measurement (WCA)

Contact angle measurements were conducted with a PG-2 Pocket Goniometer (Thwing-Albert, West Berlin, NJ, USA) under ambient conditions in dynamic mode using the sessile water drop (4–9 µL) method on the carbon surfaces. Contact angle was measured by capturing images over a 6 s period using Pocket Goniometer v.3.3 software (Thwing-Albert, West Berlin, NJ, USA) [23]. The GUITAR and N-GUITAR samples were prepared by peeling them from the quartz substrate using double sided tape (GUITAR was removed all at once, leaving a bare substrate behind), and testing was done on the freshly exposed underside. The HOPG was prepared in a similar manner using double sided tape (HOPG can be readily exfoliated a few layers at a time), and testing was carried out on the freshly exposed underside. Each measurement was carried out at five different spots at each time interval, and the values were averaged.

2.8. Electrode Fabrication and Electrochemistry

The GUITAR and N-GUITAR working electrodes were prepared as described in previous study [1]. Freshly exfoliated HOPG electrode was prepared by using adhesive tape, copper tape was used as a current collector and this surface was used within 30 s of cleavage. All electrochemical experiments were performed in an undivided three-electrode cell, with an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl, aq) reference electrode and a graphite rod as counter electrode. Electrochemical analyses were conducted with either a Bioanalytical Systems CV-50W (West Lafayette, IN, USA) or a Gamry Instruments 1000 (Warminster, PA, USA) potentiostat. All solutions were prepared using house deionized water with further purification through an activated carbon cartridge (Barnstead, model D8922, Dubuque, IA, USA). The cyclic voltammograms were modeled for standard rate constants (k0) using Digisim 3.03b software (Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. West Lafayette, IN, USA). Dopamine oxidation peak current and peak separation values for literature was estimated by using graph grabber v2.0.2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis

All XPS peak assignments are based on recent literature [24,25,26,27]. The wide scan XPS of N-GUITAR in Figure 2A reveals an atomic percentage of 86.4% C, 9.7% N and 3.9% O based on the 284.1, 398.2 and 532.4 eV binding energy peaks respectively. The based on deconvolved peaks the assignments for C1s (Figure 2B) peaks follow as 68.4% sp2 C (284.6 eV), 21.1% sp3 (286.1 eV), 7.8% C–N and C=N (287.6 eV), 2.7% C=O and COOH (289.4 eV). The material of this investigation is in line with other CVD-grown nitrogen-doped carbon materials that have N atomic content from 1 to 16% [14,28,29,30,31]. Also, the sp2/sp3 atomic ratio of this N-GUITAR is similar to undoped GUITAR in a previous investigation [1]. The O1s peak (Figure 2C) deconvolves to 55.8% N–O and C–O (532.1 eV) and 44.2% N=O and C=O (533.0 3 eV). For the N species in the N1s peaks (Figure 2D) the assignments are 23.7% pyridinic N (398.2 eV), 60.5% graphitic N-center (400.98 eV), 11.8% graphitic N-valley (403.0 eV) and 4% N-oxides (405.3 eV).

3.2. Micrographs

Figure 3 shows the visual and microscopic features of GUITAR and N-GUITAR. The flakes from both forms are undisguisable from each other and resemble high quality graphite. From the scanning electron micrographs (SEM), both a layered basal (BP) and edge plane (EP) morphology are evident. The thickness of the carbon films is 1.3–1.9 µm which increases with deposition time.

3.3. Raman Analysis

Raman spectra of N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG are shown in Figure 4. The D-band is related to the structural defects while the G-band describes the degree of graphitization [32]. The HOPG spectrum is used as a reference standard for a low defect material. The GUITAR and N-GUITAR spectra indicate an upshift in the D-band to 1350 from 1340 cm−1 and downshift in G- band to 1566 from 1578 cm−1 after nitrogen doping. This is consistent with the trends observed in literature [33,34,35]. The increase in ID/IG from 1.15 to 1.66 follows the trends observed in literature which indicates that more defects are introduced with N-doping [33].

3.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Studies

Figure 5 shows the XRD spectra of N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG. The GUITAR XRD spectra is consistent with previous publications [1]. N-GUITAR shows a basal reflection (002) peak at 2θ = 26.1°, which is intermediate of GUITAR and HOPG (25.4° and 26.65°, respectively). The d-spacing, or average interlayer distance, for N-GUITAR was found to be 341 pm, smaller than that of GUITAR (350 pm) but larger than that of HOPG (334 pm). The d-spacing was calculated from Bragg’s law, nλ = 2dsin(θ), where n = 1 and λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm). The average lateral grain size (La) for N-GUITAR and GUITAR were very similar, at 3.3 and 2.9 nm, respectively, making them both nano-crystalline. This is in contrast to HOPG, which will typically range from 30 nm to the low mm range, with the larger grain sizes indicating higher quality [36]. The grain size is calculated from Scherrer’s law, La = Kλ/βcos(θ), where K is the crystallite shape factor (1.84), β is the peak broadening at the half maximum (FWHM), and θ is the Bragg angle [37]. This indicates that there are no major structural differences between GUITAR and N-GUITAR.

3.5. Aqueous Potential Windows

The cyclic voltammograms of GUITAR and N-doped GUITAR in 1M H2SO4 at 50 mV/s are presented in Figure 6. Based on the cathodic and anodic limits at 200 µA/cm2 the potential windows for GUITAR and N-doped GUITAR are 3.0 and 2.7 V, respectively. A decrease in potential window is commonly observed in N-doped materials when compared with their corresponding undoped analogues [38]. This is attributed to faster heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics of the N-doped carbon for hydrogen and oxygen evolution [38,39]. However, both N-GUITAR and GUITAR have aqueous potential windows that are 1 V greater than sp2-hybridized carbon electrodes and match amorphous carbon (a-C) and boron-doped diamond (BDD) materials in this aspect [2,40]. Literature trends suggest that increasing in sp3-C content increases the potential window; however, at cost of lower the HET rate with the Fe(CN)64−/3− redox probe [1,41]. The GUITAR electrode counters this trend with a wide potential window and fast HET kinetics [1].

3.6. Tafel Corrosion Studies

Tafel polarization measurements were carried out in Ar saturated 1.0 M H2SO4 using a single compartment 1.0 L volume cell under vigorously stirred conditions (see Figure 7). The working electrodes were allowed to equilibrate in electrolyte solutions for ≥ 1 h to attain an equilibrium prior to the start of polarization. The working electrodes were scanned from −0.5 to +0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 1 mV/s. Corrosion current (icorr) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) were estimated by extrapolations of the respective Tafel plots [1]. The average icorr of N-GUITAR is 7.3 × 10−9 ± 3.2 × 10−9 A/cm2, a very similar anodic stability to GUITAR (2.07 × 10−9 ± 0.7 × 10−9 A/cm2). This is three orders of magnitude lower than a graphite rod (1.82 × 10−6 ± 1.06 × 10−6 A/cm2), which falls into the typical range of other sp2-C electrodes [1,42,43]. It is significant that both N-GUITAR and its undoped counterpart have an anodically stability in the range of a-C and BDD electrodes (icorr typically ranging from of 10−9 to 10−8 A/cm2) [44,45]. The corrosion resistance of GUITAR is based on a lack of electrolyte intercalation through interplanar and basal plane defects [2,46,47]. The N-doped form apparently retains this feature. The anodic limit of Figure 6 indicates that there is no intercalation of electrolyte through the BP of either GUITAR or N-GUITAR [2].

3.7. Heterogeneous Electron Transfer (HET) Characteristics of N-GUITAR with Fe(CN)63−/4−

The Fe(CN)63−/4− species is a common probe for measuring HET rates across the electrode–electrolyte interface. It is considered an inner-sphere redox couple and is strongly influenced by density of electronic states (DOS) near the Fermi level, adsorbed contaminants and surface chemistry [48,49,50]. With graphitic materials there is a clear difference in Fe(CN)63−/4− HET rates between basal (BP) and edge planes (EP). The standard rate constant (k0) for the EP and BP range from 10−5 to 10−1 and from 10−10 to 10−6 cm s−1, respectively [2,51]. Sluggish HET kinetics of graphitic materials at the BP is attributed to low DOS near the Fermi level or from aging in laboratory air, which creates an adsorbed layer of volatile organic compounds [9,10,11,52]. Figure 8 shows the CV recorded for 1 mM Fe(CN)63−/4− in 0.1 M KCl at 50 mV/sec. Basal plane GUITAR electrodes are unusual in that the there is a fast calculated k0 of 1.2 × 10−2 cm/s and 1.6 × 10−2 cm/s for N-GUITAR [1,2]. This lies in the upper range of other N-doped and undoped carbon electrodes (1.02 × 10−4 to 1.5 × 10−2 cm/s) [39,40,53,54]. Both materials have fast HET kinetics due to the rich density of structural defects which increase DOS [55].

3.8. N-GUITAR Is Resistant to Air-Aging

Several investigators have examined the air-aging effects of HOPG with the Fe (CN)63−/4− probe [2,11,15,56]. Unwin et al. examined freshly cleaved surfaces of HOPG electrodes that have a CV peak separation (ΔEp) of 58 mV. After 3 h of exposure to air, that surface exhibited a decrease in HET rates with a ΔEp of 450 mV [11]. Liu et al. also conducted a study of HOPG air aging. By storing their electrodes at −15° C they were able to slow the aging effect. The ΔEp increased at a slower rate from 59 mV on a fresh surface to 95 mV at 8 h [15]. Compton and coworkers showed that ΔEp increases from 227 to 596mV at 2 h [56]. A recent body of literature indicates that this effect is from the adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) onto the surface of HOPG, which creates a barrier to HET. Ellipsometry indicates that this layer is about 0.6 nm thick [15]. Water droplet contact angle (WCA) measurements also support the adsorption hypothesis. Generally, other investigators have found that HOPG and graphene surfaces become more hydrophobic with exposure time, increasing in contact angle from 59–70° to 90–95° [15,16,57,58].
In this investigation a freshly cleaved surface of HOPG gave Fe(CN)63−/4− ΔEp of 67 mV with a standard deviation of 4 mV over three measurements at 50 mV/s. The ΔEp increases to 165 ± 60 and 221 ± 30 mV at the 1 and 3 h intervals, respectively (Figure 8C). This trend follows literature observations. During that interval the WCA increased from 63.8° ± 5.2° to 80.1° ± 10.8°, again matching literature trends. GUITAR electrodes (Figure 8B) gave increases in ΔEp from 71 ± 2 to 102 ± 5 mV and WCA from 62.6° ± 5.5° to 78.4° ± 7.2° from the 0 to 3 h time interval. These CV trends match that of a previous investigation [2]. Figure 8A demonstrates that N-GUITAR is the most resistant to air-aging effects when compared to literature and to GUITAR. The CV exhibited a minimal increase from 66 ± 5 to 69 ± 3 mV for ΔEp from the fresh surface to 3 h of air exposure. The change in WCA for N-GUITAR again exhibited a minimal increase from 55.8° ± 7.1° to 70.4° ± 5.0° after aging. No other material was observed in the literature that has such resistance to air-aging. This remarkable property indicates excellent prospects for durable electrochemical sensors [4,5,6,7,59].

3.9. N-Doped GUITAR Is Tolereant to Dopamine Fouling Because of Fast HET Kinetics

Figure 9A shows the CV response of N-GUITAR at relatively high (1 mM) and low concentration (1 µM) of dopamine (DA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The CV waves are assigned the process seen in step 1 of Figure 10. The ΔEp for 1 mM DA (CV wave seen in Figure 9A) is 83 mV at 100 mV/s. Decreasing ΔEp is associated with faster HET rates [19]. This is the narrowest ΔEp for DA reported in the literature with the exception of EP-pyrolytic graphite, with 59 mV [17]. The ΔEp for GUITAR is 174 mV. Generally, ΔEp varies from 100 to 350 mV for most carbon electrodes [17,19].
Due to their biocompatibility and chemical inertness, carbon electrodes are favored for in vivo voltammetric detection of dopamine [60]. However, they are highly susceptible to fouling from the dopamine polymerization process described in the introduction and the scheme seen in Figure 10. Generally, carbon electrodes tend to lose 20 to 75% of CV current signal after 10 cycles with 1 mM DA [17,19]. Figure 9B plots the peak current with each CV cycle for three trial runs. One standard deviation error bar is expressed for each point. For N-GUITAR at 1 µM DA there is no loss of peak current over 10 CV cycles. At the higher concentration of 1 mM there is a 10% loss in peak current. The GUITAR electrode experienced a 25% loss in peak current which is in the range of other carbon materials [17,19]. By maintaining the DA peak current, it is apparent that the N-GUITAR surface provides less favorable conditions for the formation of polydopamine.
The reaction scheme for electrode fouling is shown below in Figure 10. The CV waves of Figure 9A A are associated with DA and its oxidized product, o-dopaminoquinone (Step 1). It is the latter that undergoes processes with further electro-oxidation that result in electrode fouling through Steps 2–4 [19,22]. The fraction of o-dopaminoquinone that contributes to fouling can be described by the ratio of CV peak anodic and cathodic currents, ip,a/ip,c. A quantity close to one is associated with a lower fraction of o-dopaminoquinone contributing to Steps 2–4. Higher values of ip,a/ip,c indicate that the electrode fouling processes are more facile.
For N-GUITAR electrode, the ip,a/ip,c ratio is 1.3; this is the lowest value reported in literature. For GUITAR, this value is 1.7. This indicates that o-dopaminoquinone is least likely to contribute to fouling using the N-GUITAR material. Figure 11 illustrates the performance of N-GUITAR in comparison with the literature. A plot of ip,a/ip,c vs. ΔEp for DA is shown in Figure 11A, with a clear trend of fast HET rates being associated with a lower ip,a/ip,c ratio. Rapid consumption of o-dopaminoquinone reduces the probability of electrode fouling by Steps 2–4. This effect may be attributed to the HET rate of o-dopaminoquinone reduction back to DA (inverse Step 1). Figure 11B illustrates that low ip,a/ip,c is associated with less ip,a signal loss over 10 CV cycles. Fast HET rates with a variety of redox species on GUITAR electrodes have been discussed in previous publications [2,4,7,62]. This effect is associated with a high DOS arising from structural defects. It is apparent that this effect is enhanced by nitrogen doping GUITAR. The only exception to this trend is the pure sp3 material, BDD (number 4, Figure 11B), which has relatively slow HET kinetics for DA but exhibited less fouling than is expected from the trend.

4. Conclusions

The N-GUITAR material maintains the features of GUITAR electrodes, e.g., fast HET rates, wide aqueous potential window and resistance to corrosion. However, it deviates from GUITAR in that it exhibits more resistance to fouling than GUITAR and to other carbon electrodes. The two studies representing the predominant mechanisms of fouling—physical adsorption and polymerization of matrix components—were both observed to be less severe on the surface of N-GUITAR over GUITAR and literature carbon electrodes. In air-aging studies, the WCA measurements indicate that N-GUITAR is less susceptible to VOC physical adsorption than GUITAR or other literature carbon electrodes. In fouling by DA electro-oxidation, N-GUITAR also shows less susceptibility than GUITAR or literature carbons. This is most attributed to fast HET kinetics for the DA/o-dopaminoquinone redox couple on the N-GUITAR electrode. The combination of fast HET and resistance to signal attenuation indicates much promise for N-GUITAR electrodes for DA sensing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization of the project, manuscript writing, and a major portion of the experimental work was done by K.H.; Sample preparation, XRD analysis, manuscript writing, and editing was done by J.M.; SEM micrographs performed by H.Z.; Preparation of GUITAR electrodes was done by F.D.; XPS analysis performed by E.E. and supervised by D.N.M.; Raman analysis done by E.A.; manuscript writing, project administration and supervision done by I.F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the university of Idaho for its support of the graduate students through teaching assistantships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kabir, H.; Zhu, H.; May, J.; Hamal, K.; Kan, Y.; Williams, T.; Echeverria, E.; McIlroy, D.N.; Estrada, D.; Davis, P.H.; et al. The sp2-sp3 carbon hybridization content of nanocrystalline graphite from pyrolyzed vegetable oil, comparison of electrochemistry and physical properties with other carbon forms and allotropes. Carbon 2019, 144, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gyan, I.O.; Wojcik, P.M.; Aston, D.E.; McIlroy, D.N.; Cheng, I.F. A Study of the Electrochemical Properties of a New Graphitic Material: GUITAR. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, I.F.; Xie, Y.; Allen Gonzales, R.; Brejna, P.R.; Sundararajan, J.P.; Fouetio Kengne, B.A.; Eric Aston, D.; McIlroy, D.N.; Foutch, J.D.; Griffiths, P.R. Synthesis of graphene paper from pyrolyzed asphalt. Carbon 2011, 49, 2852–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gyan, I.O.; Cheng, I.F. Electrochemical study of biologically relevant molecules at electrodes constructed from GUITAR, a new carbon allotrope. Microchem. J. 2015, 122, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kabir, H.; Ma, P.Y.; Renn, N.; Nicholas, N.W.; Cheng, I.F. Electrochemical determination of free chlorine on pseudo-graphite electrode. Talanta 2019, 205, 120101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kabir, H.; Zhu, H.; Lopez, R.; Nicholas, N.W.; McIlroy, D.N.; Echeverria, E.; May, J.; Cheng, I.F. Electrochemical determination of chemical oxygen demand on functionalized pseudo-graphite electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 113448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, H.; Hassan, T.; Kabir, H.; May, J.; Hamal, K.; Lopez, R.J.; Smith, H.W.; Nicholas, N.; Sankaran, P.N.; McIlroy, D.; et al. Voltammetric pH sensor based on electrochemically modified pseudo-graphite. Analyst 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Slate, A.J.; Brownson, D.A.C.; Dena, A.S.A.; Smith, G.C.; Whitehead, K.A.; Banks, C.E. Exploring the electrochemical performance of graphite and graphene paste electrodes composed of varying lateral flake sizes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 20010–20022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. McCreery, R.L.; McDermott, M.T. Comment on Electrochemical Kinetics at Ordered Graphite Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 2602–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davies, T.J.; Hyde, M.E.; Compton, R.G. Nanotrench Arrays Reveal Insight into Graphite Electrochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5121–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Patel, A.N.; Collignon, M.G.; O’Connell, M.A.; Hung, W.O.Y.; McKelvey, K.; Macpherson, J.V.; Unwin, P.R. A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20117–20130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.; Maiyalagan, T.; Wang, X. Review on Recent Progress in Nitrogen-Doped Graphene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Its Potential Applications. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Inagaki, M.; Toyoda, M.; Soneda, Y.; Morishita, T. Nitrogen-doped carbon materials. Carbon 2018, 132, 104–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wei, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Yu, G. Synthesis of N-Doped Graphene by Chemical Vapor Deposition and Its Electrical Properties. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1752–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Kozbial, A.; Nioradze, N.; Parobek, D.; Shenoy, G.J.; Salim, M.; Amemiya, S.; Li, L.; Liu, H. Water Protects Graphitic Surface from Airborne Hydrocarbon Contamination. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Salim, M.; Hurst, J.; Montgomery, M.; Tolman, N.; Liu, H. Airborne contamination of graphite as analyzed by ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2019, 235, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patel, A.N.; Tan, S.; Miller, T.S.; Macpherson, J.V.; Unwin, P.R. Comparison and Reappraisal of Carbon Electrodes for the Voltammetric Detection of Dopamine. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 11755–11764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Trouillon, R.; O’Hare, D. Comparison of glassy carbon and boron doped diamond electrodes: Resistance to biofouling. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 6586–6595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peltola, E.; Sainio, S.; Holt, K.B.; Palomäki, T.; Koskinen, J.; Laurila, T. Electrochemical Fouling of Dopamine and Recovery of Carbon Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Puthongkham, P.; Venton, B.J. Nanodiamond Coating Improves the Sensitivity and Antifouling Properties of Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2403–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bennet, K.E.; Tomshine, J.R.; Min, H.-K.; Manciu, F.S.; Marsh, M.P.; Paek, S.B.; Settell, M.L.; Nicolai, E.N.; Blaha, C.D.; Kouzani, A.Z.; et al. A Diamond-Based Electrode for Detection of Neurochemicals in the Human Brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci 2016, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Hanssen, B.L.; Siraj, S.; Wong, D.K.Y. Recent strategies to minimise fouling in electrochemical detection systems. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016, 35, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luo, S.; Cao, J.; McDonald, A.G. Esterification of industrial lignin and its effect on the resulting poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) or polypropylene blends. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 97, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ouyang, W.; Zeng, D.; Yu, X.; Xie, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Yan, J.; Xie, F.; Wang, L.; Meng, H.; et al. Exploring the active sites of nitrogen-doped graphene as catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 15996–16005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ratso, S.; Kruusenberg, I.; Vikkisk, M.; Joost, U.; Shulga, E.; Kink, I.; Kallio, T.; Tammeveski, K. Highly active nitrogen-doped few-layer graphene/carbon nanotube composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. Carbon 2014, 73, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, D.; Shibuya, R.; Akiba, C.; Saji, S.; Kondo, T.; Nakamura, J. Active sites of nitrogen-doped carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction clarified using model catalysts. Science 2016, 351, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, J.; Ma, L.; Yadav, R.M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Vajtai, R.; Lou, J.; Ajayan, P.M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene with Pyridinic Dominance as a Highly Active and Stable Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14763–14769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, T.; Shen, H.; Sun, L.; Cheng, B.; Liu, B.; Shen, J. Nitrogen and boron doped monolayer graphene by chemical vapor deposition using polystyrene, urea and boric acid. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 1385–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luo, Z.; Lim, S.; Tian, Z.; Shang, J.; Lai, L.; MacDonald, B.; Fu, C.; Shen, Z.; Yu, T.; Lin, J. Pyridinic N doped graphene: Synthesis, electronic structure, and electrocatalytic property. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 8038–8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zan, R.; Altuntepe, A. Nitrogen doping of graphene by CVD. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1199, 127026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, H.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Huo, K.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y. Synergism of C5N Six-Membered Ring and Vapor−Liquid−Solid Growth of CNx Nanotubes with Pyridine Precursor. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 16422–16427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Couzi, M.; Bruneel, J.-L.; Talaga, D.; Bokobza, L. A multi wavelength Raman scattering study of defective graphitic carbon materials: The first order Raman spectra revisited. Carbon 2016, 107, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Q.-H.; Hou, P.-X.; Unno, M.; Yamauchi, S.; Saito, R.; Kyotani, T. Dual Raman Features of Double Coaxial Carbon Nanotubes with N-Doped and B-Doped Multiwalls. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2465–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sheng, Z.-H.; Shao, L.; Chen, J.-J.; Bao, W.-J.; Wang, F.-B.; Xia, X.-H. Catalyst-Free Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene via Thermal Annealing Graphite Oxide with Melamine and Its Excellent Electrocatalysis. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4350–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Panchakarla, L.S.; Govindaraj, A.; Rao, C.N.R. Nitrogen- and Boron-Doped Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2007, 1, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Andonovic, B.; Temkov, M.; Ademi, A.; Petrovski, A. Laue functions model vs. scherrer equation in determination of graphene layers number on the ground of xrd data. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 2014, 6, 545–550. [Google Scholar]
  37. Warren, B.E. X-Ray Diffraction in Random Layer Lattices. Phys. Rev. 1941, 59, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamata, T.; Kato, D.; Niwa, O. Electrochemical performance at sputter-deposited nanocarbon film with different surface nitrogen-containing groups. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 10239–10246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tanaka, Y.; Furuta, M.; Kuriyama, K.; Kuwabara, R.; Katsuki, Y.; Kondo, T.; Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical properties of N-doped hydrogenated amorphous carbon films fabricated by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition methods. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.; Haubold, L.; DeVivo, G.; Swain, G.M. Electroanalytical Performance of Nitrogen-Containing Tetrahedral Amorphous Carbon Thin-Film Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 6240–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kamata, T.; Kato, D.; Ida, H.; Niwa, O. Structure and electrochemical characterization of carbon films formed by unbalanced magnetron (UBM) sputtering method. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2014, 49, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, W.; Wei, Z.; Su, W.; Fan, X.; Liu, J.; Yan, C.; Zeng, C. Kinetic investigation of vanadium (V)/(IV) redox couple on electrochemically oxidized graphite electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 205, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chorbadzhiyska, E.; Bardarov, I.; Hubenova, Y.; Mitov, M. Graphite–Metal Oxide Composites as Potential Anodic Catalysts for Microbial Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2020, 10, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kapałka, A.; Fóti, G.; Comninellis, C. Determination of the Tafel slope for oxygen evolution on boron-doped diamond electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suffredini, H.B.; Machado, S.A.S.; Avaca, L.A. The water decomposition reactions on boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2004, 15, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Goss, C.A.; Brumfield, J.C.; Irene, E.A.; Murray, R.W. Imaging the incipient electrochemical oxidation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1378–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alliata, D.; Kötz, R.; Haas, O.; Siegenthaler, H. In Situ AFM Study of Interlayer Spacing during Anion Intercalation into HOPG in Aqueous Electrolyte. Langmuir 1999, 15, 8483–8489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McCreery, R.L. Advanced Carbon Electrode Materials for Molecular Electrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2646–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, L.; Cao, Y.; Diao, D. Nanosized graphene sheets induced high electrochemical activity in pure carbon film. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 262, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, P.; McCreery, R.L. Control of Electron Transfer Kinetics at Glassy Carbon Electrodes by Specific Surface Modification. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3958–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Villarreal, C.C.; Pham, T.; Ramnani, P.; Mulchandani, A. Carbon allotropes as sensors for environmental monitoring. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 3, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kislenko, V.A.; Pavlov, S.V.; Kislenko, S.A. Influence of defects in graphene on electron transfer kinetics: The role of the surface electronic structure. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 341, 136011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kamata, T.; Kato, D.; Hirono, S.; Niwa, O. Structure and Electrochemical Performance of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Film Formed by Electron Cyclotron Resonance Sputtering. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9845–9851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lagrini, A.; Deslouis, C.; Cachet, H.; Benlahsen, M.; Charvet, S. Elaboration and electrochemical characterization of nitrogenated amorphous carbon films. Electrochem. Commun. 2004, 6, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhong, J.-H.; Zhang, J.; Jin, X.; Liu, J.-Y.; Li, Q.; Li, M.-H.; Cai, W.; Wu, D.-Y.; Zhan, D.; Ren, B. Quantitative Correlation between Defect Density and Heterogeneous Electron Transfer Rate of Single Layer Graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16609–16617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ji, X.; Banks, C.E.; Crossley, A.; Compton, R.G. Oxygenated Edge Plane Sites Slow the Electron Transfer of the Ferro-/Ferricyanide Redox Couple at Graphite Electrodes. ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Kozbial, A.; Shenoy, G.; Zhou, F.; McGinley, R.; Ireland, P.; Morganstein, B.; Kunkel, A.; Surwade, S.P.; et al. Effect of airborne contaminants on the wettability of supported graphene and graphite. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kozbial, A.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Gong, X.; Zhou, F.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Understanding the intrinsic water wettability of graphite. Carbon 2014, 74, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kabir, H.; Lopez, R.; May, J.; Hamal, K.; Nicholas, N.W.; Cheng, I.F. Salicylic Acid Detection Using a Pseudo-Graphite Electrode. Curr. Top. Anal. Chem. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kamal Eddin, F.B.; Wing Fen, Y. Recent Advances in Electrochemical and Optical Sensing of Dopamine. Sensors 2020, 20, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Harreither, W.; Trouillon, R.; Poulin, P.; Neri, W.; Ewing, A.G.; Safina, G. Carbon Nanotube Fiber Microelectrodes Show a Higher Resistance to Dopamine Fouling. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 7447–7453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kabir, H.; Gyan, I.O.; Foutch, J.D.; Zhu, H.; Cheng, I.F. Application of GUITAR on the Negative Electrode of the Vanadium Redox Flow Battery: Improved V3+/2+ Heterogeneous Electron Transfer with Reduced Hydrogen Gassing. C J. Carbon Res. 2016, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Carbon 06 00068 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic for synthesis of N-doped pseudo-graphite using a modified CVD technique.
Figure 1. Schematic for synthesis of N-doped pseudo-graphite using a modified CVD technique.
Carbon 06 00068 g001
Carbon 06 00068 g002 550
Figure 2. XPS analysis of N-doped pseudo graphite with the respective peak assignments and abundances. (A) the wide scan spectrum. The C1s (B), O1s (C) and N1s (D) peaks with deconvolved components. The N1s and O1s spectra are presented with the raw and smoothed data using the Savitzky-Golay method. Experimental data is in black and fitted curves are in red. The structures of the nitrogen species are shown at the bottom.
Figure 2. XPS analysis of N-doped pseudo graphite with the respective peak assignments and abundances. (A) the wide scan spectrum. The C1s (B), O1s (C) and N1s (D) peaks with deconvolved components. The N1s and O1s spectra are presented with the raw and smoothed data using the Savitzky-Golay method. Experimental data is in black and fitted curves are in red. The structures of the nitrogen species are shown at the bottom.
Carbon 06 00068 g002
Carbon 06 00068 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of GUITAR (A) and N-GUITAR (B) with photographs of the flakes in the upper left insets. Both materials exhibit layered morphologies with edge and basal planes. The lower left insets show the SEM’s of edge planes in more detail.
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of GUITAR (A) and N-GUITAR (B) with photographs of the flakes in the upper left insets. Both materials exhibit layered morphologies with edge and basal planes. The lower left insets show the SEM’s of edge planes in more detail.
Carbon 06 00068 g003
Carbon 06 00068 g004 550
Figure 4. Raman spectra for N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG taken with a 532 nm laser.
Figure 4. Raman spectra for N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG taken with a 532 nm laser.
Carbon 06 00068 g004
Carbon 06 00068 g005 550
Figure 5. Powder XRD spectra of (A) N-GUITAR, (B) Pristine GUITAR and (C) HOPG.
Figure 5. Powder XRD spectra of (A) N-GUITAR, (B) Pristine GUITAR and (C) HOPG.
Carbon 06 00068 g005
Carbon 06 00068 g006 550
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammetric behavior of GUITAR (dashed line) and N-doped GUITAR (solid line) in 1 M H2SO4 taken at 50 mV/s. The starting potential for both anodic (right) and cathodic (left) sweeps is 0.0 V. The 200 µA/cm2 potential limits are indicted with black dots and the potential windows are listed in the table inset.
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammetric behavior of GUITAR (dashed line) and N-doped GUITAR (solid line) in 1 M H2SO4 taken at 50 mV/s. The starting potential for both anodic (right) and cathodic (left) sweeps is 0.0 V. The 200 µA/cm2 potential limits are indicted with black dots and the potential windows are listed in the table inset.
Carbon 06 00068 g006
Carbon 06 00068 g007 550
Figure 7. Tafel Plots with extrapolated corrosion currents (icorr, A/cm2) indicated for each. The average and one standard deviation interval (n = 3) are reported for electrode material.
Figure 7. Tafel Plots with extrapolated corrosion currents (icorr, A/cm2) indicated for each. The average and one standard deviation interval (n = 3) are reported for electrode material.
Carbon 06 00068 g007
Carbon 06 00068 g008 550
Figure 8. Cyclic Voltammetric (CV) studies for the N-GUITAR (A), GUITAR (B) and HOPG (C) electrode with 1 mM Fe (CN)63−/4− in 0.1 M KCl at 50 mV/sec. CV were recorded in freshly exfoliated surface at 0, 1, and 3 h of air exposure (n = 3). Water contact angle measurement (WCA) on N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG are also shown on their respective positions. WCA measurements were also carried out on freshly exfoliated surfaces at 0, 1, and 3 h of air exposure.
Figure 8. Cyclic Voltammetric (CV) studies for the N-GUITAR (A), GUITAR (B) and HOPG (C) electrode with 1 mM Fe (CN)63−/4− in 0.1 M KCl at 50 mV/sec. CV were recorded in freshly exfoliated surface at 0, 1, and 3 h of air exposure (n = 3). Water contact angle measurement (WCA) on N-GUITAR, GUITAR and HOPG are also shown on their respective positions. WCA measurements were also carried out on freshly exfoliated surfaces at 0, 1, and 3 h of air exposure.
Carbon 06 00068 g008
Carbon 06 00068 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) 10 CV cycles recorded in 1 mM and (inset) 1 µM dopamine in 0.1 M phosphate buffer system (PBS) at pH 7.0 at 100 mV/sec for N-GUITAR electrode. (B) Plot of relative oxidative peak current density vs. number of CV runs. The one standard deviation interval for three CV runs are shown with each data point.
Figure 9. (A) 10 CV cycles recorded in 1 mM and (inset) 1 µM dopamine in 0.1 M phosphate buffer system (PBS) at pH 7.0 at 100 mV/sec for N-GUITAR electrode. (B) Plot of relative oxidative peak current density vs. number of CV runs. The one standard deviation interval for three CV runs are shown with each data point.
Carbon 06 00068 g009
Carbon 06 00068 g010 550
Figure 10. Reaction scheme for electrode fouling by electrochemical dopamine oxidation [17,61]. In Step 1, the electrode oxidation and reduction are assigned to the cyclic voltammetric (CV) waves of Figure 9A. Steps 2–4 are the spontaneous series of reactions that result in the formation of the insulating layer of melanin-like polydopamine.
Figure 10. Reaction scheme for electrode fouling by electrochemical dopamine oxidation [17,61]. In Step 1, the electrode oxidation and reduction are assigned to the cyclic voltammetric (CV) waves of Figure 9A. Steps 2–4 are the spontaneous series of reactions that result in the formation of the insulating layer of melanin-like polydopamine.
Carbon 06 00068 g010
Carbon 06 00068 g011 550
Figure 11. The cyclic voltammetric trends regarding HET kinetics of Step 1 in Figure 10. N-GUITAR and GUITAR as well as literature data were recorded in 1 mM DA at pH 7 phosphate buffer solutions [17,18,19]. The ip,a/ip,c ratio indicates the reversibility of Step 1 and electrode fouling through loss of ip,a. (A) Plot of ip,a/ip,c vs. ΔEp for N-GUITAR, GUITAR and literature carbon. It is clear that a trend forms with fast HET kinetics (narrow ΔEp) and lower ip,a/ip,c. (B) Electrode fouling through ip,a loss vs. ip,a/ip,c after 10 cycles. The trends are in the shaded region and show that N-GUITAR has the fastest HET rate (A) with the least amount of electrode fouling (B).
Figure 11. The cyclic voltammetric trends regarding HET kinetics of Step 1 in Figure 10. N-GUITAR and GUITAR as well as literature data were recorded in 1 mM DA at pH 7 phosphate buffer solutions [17,18,19]. The ip,a/ip,c ratio indicates the reversibility of Step 1 and electrode fouling through loss of ip,a. (A) Plot of ip,a/ip,c vs. ΔEp for N-GUITAR, GUITAR and literature carbon. It is clear that a trend forms with fast HET kinetics (narrow ΔEp) and lower ip,a/ip,c. (B) Electrode fouling through ip,a loss vs. ip,a/ip,c after 10 cycles. The trends are in the shaded region and show that N-GUITAR has the fastest HET rate (A) with the least amount of electrode fouling (B).
Carbon 06 00068 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamal, K.; May, J.; Zhu, H.; Dalbec, F.; Echeverria, E.; McIlroy, D.N.; Aston, E.; Cheng, I.F. Electrochemical Aspects of a Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphitic Carbon Material: Resistance to Electrode Fouling by Air-Aging and Dopamine Electro-Oxidation. C 2020, 6, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6040068

AMA Style

Hamal K, May J, Zhu H, Dalbec F, Echeverria E, McIlroy DN, Aston E, Cheng IF. Electrochemical Aspects of a Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphitic Carbon Material: Resistance to Electrode Fouling by Air-Aging and Dopamine Electro-Oxidation. C. 2020; 6(4):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6040068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamal, Kailash, Jeremy May, Haoyu Zhu, Forrest Dalbec, Elena Echeverria, David N. McIlroy, Eric Aston, and I. Francis Cheng. 2020. "Electrochemical Aspects of a Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphitic Carbon Material: Resistance to Electrode Fouling by Air-Aging and Dopamine Electro-Oxidation" C 6, no. 4: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6040068

APA Style

Hamal, K., May, J., Zhu, H., Dalbec, F., Echeverria, E., McIlroy, D. N., Aston, E., & Cheng, I. F. (2020). Electrochemical Aspects of a Nitrogen-Doped Pseudo-Graphitic Carbon Material: Resistance to Electrode Fouling by Air-Aging and Dopamine Electro-Oxidation. C, 6(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6040068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop