Next Article in Journal
A New Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic Fractional Visco-Inelastic Model to Predict Experimentally Inaccessible Processes and Investigate Pathophysiological Cellular Structures
Next Article in Special Issue
Database of Near-Wall Turbulent Flow Properties of a Jet Impinging on a Solid Surface under Different Inclination Angles
Previous Article in Journal
The Interaction of Two Surface Vortices Near a Topographic Slope in a Stratified Ocean
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Iterative Partitioned Methods for Uncoupling Evolutionary Groundwater–Surface Water Flows
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Fluids 2017, 2(4), 58;

Improving Accuracy in α-Models of Turbulence through Approximate Deconvolution

Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, București 060042, Romania
Received: 29 June 2017 / Revised: 24 September 2017 / Accepted: 11 October 2017 / Published: 27 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Turbulence: Numerical Analysis, Modelling and Simulation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [493 KB, uploaded 1 November 2017]   |  


In this report, we present several results in the theory of α -models of turbulence with improved accuracy that have been developed in recent years. The α -models considered herein are the Leray- α model, the zeroth Approximate Deconvolution Model (ADM) turbulence model, the modified Leray- α and the Navier–Stokes- α model. For all of the models from above, the accuracy is limited to α 2 in smooth flow regions. Better accuracy requires decreasing the filter radius α , which, in turn, requires a smaller mesh width that will lead in the end to a higher computational cost. Instead, one can use approximate deconvolution (without decreasing the mesh size) to attain better accuracy. Such deconvolution methods have been considered recently in many studies that show the efficiency of this approach. For smooth flows, periodic boundary conditions and van Cittert deconvolution operator of order N, the expected accuracy is α 2 N + 2 . In a bounded domain, such results are valid only in case special conditions are satisfied. In more general conditions, the author has recently proved that, in the case of the ADM, the expected accuracy of the finite element method with Taylor–Hood elements and Crank–Nicolson time stepping method is Δ t 2 + h 2 + K N α 2 , where the constant K < 1 depends on the ratio α / h , which is assumed constant. In this study, we present the extension of the result to the rest of the models. View Full-Text
Keywords: large eddy simulation; turbulence; approximate deconvolution; discrete Stokes filter; finite element method large eddy simulation; turbulence; approximate deconvolution; discrete Stokes filter; finite element method

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Dunca, A.A. Improving Accuracy in α-Models of Turbulence through Approximate Deconvolution. Fluids 2017, 2, 58.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Fluids EISSN 2311-5521 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top