Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Research on Ship Wave-Induced Motions of Tidal Turbine Catamaran
Previous Article in Special Issue
Statistical Physics Perspective on Droplet Spreading in Reactive Wetting Interfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading

by
Alireza Mohammad Karim
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Fluids 2025, 10(8), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080206
Submission received: 24 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 August 2025 / Published: 6 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading)
Contact line motion occurs when a liquid encounters a solid surface. The physics of liquid contact line movement and droplet spreading involves interfacial science and fluid dynamics. Contact line dynamics and droplet spreading significantly impact a broad range of scientific fields and technologies, including microfluidics, nanofluidics, printed electronics, nano-printing, 3D bioprinting, coatings, and phase-change heat transfer. The contact line is a three-phase region (gas/liquid/solid or liquid/liquid/solid) with an intricate configuration. Its structure depends on several parameters, namely the solid surface topography, liquid rheology, gas environment, and other physical properties of each phase. In this Special Issue, we aim to explore the recent developments in contact line physics and droplet impact mechanisms, encompassing theory, state-of-the-art experiments, and computations while considering their applications in various scientific and technological fields, including biotechnology, microfluidics, nanofluidics, printings, and coatings, as well as heat transfer.
In spray paintings, Ye et al. [1] computationally explored the mechanism of viscous droplet impact on dry and wetted solid walls, considering air entrapment, film structure, and flake flat pigment orientation using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program. The numerical results were compared with observations using high-speed visualization [1]. In printings, Shah and Mohan [2] presented a model for droplet evolution using the volume of fluid (VOF) approach to solve Navier–Stokes and continuity equations for incompressible flow, with various immiscible phases in a finite volume. Their computational model agreed well with observations of the impact, spread, and recoil of droplets on a substrate [2]. In their study, they considered three main non-dimensional parameters, including the Reynolds number, Weber number, and Ohnesorge number [2]. Water droplet impact dynamics on a two-layered pool composed of an ultrathin suspended layer of silicone oil on top of a deep water pool was explored by Dehghanghadikolaei et al. [3]. They found that the viscosity of the suspended oil layer is a major parameter to regulate droplet impact dynamics [3]. In spray coatings, Stober et al. [4] studied the asymmetric crown morphology caused by an oblique impact (α = α = 60°) of a single droplet on a horizontal wetted wall with the same liquid film. They showed that the Weber number variation in the splashing stage causes distinct crown morphologies [4].
Droplet impact and coalescence physics was investigated by Chashechkin and Ilinykh [5] via probing the flow pattern, cavity formation, and distribution of a free-falling droplet onto a liquid pool at rest. They also considered the droplet coalescence based on the observed energy conservation due to the droplet’s kinetic energy and surface potential energy. Beloborodov and Vishnyakov [6] studied the coalescence dynamics of Lennard–Jones nano-droplets as a function of droplet size and temperature using molecular simulations. Comparing the duration of coalescence with the droplet lifespan in a suspension revealed that for dense suspensions and small droplets, the coalescence timescale is enhanced and needs to be taken into account in aggregation theoretical modeling [6].
In organized packings, Croce and Suzzi [7] computationally examined liquid film instability in a falling down motion on a vertical plate with lateral walls, mimicking the structured packing configuration by applying the lubrication assumption. Their numerical findings, based on a linear stability analysis and considering substrate wettability, suggested that the formed rivulets at a wavelength larger than the minimum threshold promote partial dewetting [7]. In the interfacial instability of a complex multi-phase flow, Hasegawa and Kishimoto [8] experimentally explored the contact line and interfacial instability dynamics of a binary droplet (a water and 2-propanol (IPA) mixture) on an immiscible (sunflower oil) pool. Their experimental observations showed that fingering instability is driven by the capillary effect for a liquid–liquid system and Plateau–Rayleigh instability [8].
The impact of biochemically active heterogeneous droplets on a solid surface plays a key role in the food and pharmaceutical industry. In an advanced drug delivery system, suspended therapeutic particles in an aqueous environment (i.e., heterogeneous droplets) are deposited onto a solid surface. It is critical to print uniform drug-loaded droplets on a substrate surface for sustained and regulated drug release in patients upon administration. The bioactive heterogeneous droplet impact mechanism deserves much more attention in future research. In bacterial encapsulation process, motivated by the food and pharmaceutical industry, Mohd Isa et al. [9] studied the encapsulation of bacteria in single water-in-oil (W/O) and double water-in-oil-in-water (W1/O/W2) emulsions under cold storage and temperature-regulated release conditions. In their study, storage conditions at freezing temperatures (−20 °C and −80 °C) caused an extensive droplet destabilization with a rapid release of encapsulated bacteria upon thawing, where the temperature-regulated release of encapsulated bacteria was reached [9]. Their study provides an excellent review for utilizing emulsion droplets for temperature-regulated bacterial encapsulation, which is a crucial factor to consider for food and pharmaceutical storage and usage.
The dropwise condensation of steam over a hybrid hydrophobic–hydrophilic surface was numerically explored by Croce and Suzzi [10] through a non-dimensional analysis of the heat transfer model using a Lagrangian approach. Their computational findings agreed well with observations, and they showed that heat flux was enhanced under various operating conditions by the hybrid surface [10]. In the development of energy systems and thermal management processes, Lakew et al. [11] explored a bubble growth mechanism for modeling boiling heat transfer to reach the optimum heat flux needed for its operation. They presented analyses of evaporating ultra-thin (i.e., microlayer) liquid underneath steam bubbles growing at the heated surface in the atmospheric pressure nucleate of boiling water [11].
The contact line dynamics of ionic liquids at the mesoscopic scale was investigated by Carvalho et al. [12]. They examined the effect of the deposition speed and substrate temperature on the nucleation, droplet formation, and droplet spread of the ionic liquid films formed by thermal evaporation [12]. They considered four ionic liquids consisting of an alkylimidazolium cation (CnC1im) and either bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (NTf2) or triflate (OTf) as the anion [12]. Each ionic liquid droplet was simultaneously deposited on surfaces of indium tin oxide (ITO) and silver (Ag) [12]. They found that the substrate’s wettability by the ionic liquids was remarkably influenced by changes in the mass flow rate and substrate temperature [12]. Taitelbaum [13] provided a review on the top-view reactive contact line dynamics based on statistical physics, with significant attention on the spread of mercury droplets over metal-on-glass at room temperature, and compared the findings with the case of reactive droplets spreading at high temperatures. Mohammad Karim and Suszynski [14] provided a comprehensive review of the conventional physical models applied for describing the contact line dynamics, using hydrodynamics and molecular kinetics.
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly advanced technology in regenerative medicine such as cardiac tissue engineering and 3D cancer modeling [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. However, more studies still need to be performed to precisely mimic the complex microstructures and nanostructures of biological tissues and accurately control the distribution of cells, biochemical factors, and biomaterials in a layer-by-layer approach.
With the emerging advancements in technology ranging from machine/deep learning, quantum power, and nanoscience, it is highly recommended to utilize these state-of-the-art tools to conduct research in the field of droplet impact for complex systems due to droplet biochemical heterogeneity and the heterogeneous topography of substrate surfaces. A recent study utilized machine learning along with experimental observation to study the spreading and freezing process of water droplet impact upon a supercooled substrate [55]. There has been significant attention on bioprinting for healthcare and medicine to print live biological cells and be used for artificial organ synthesis and tissue engineering [18,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. Over the last decade, a remarkable advancement has been achieved in the field of printed electronics for the application of wearable and stretchable sensors [56].
Finally, we thank the authors and reviewers for their contributions to this Special Issue by sharing their research or their comments in the rigorous review process to provide a highly selective collection of articles in the field of contact line physics and droplet impact dynamics.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ye, Q.; Tiedje, O.; Shen, B.; Domnick, J. Impact of Viscous Droplets on Dry and Wet Substrates for Spray Painting Processes. Fluids 2025, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shah, R.; Mohan, R.V. Computational Modeling of Droplet-Based Printing Using Multiphase Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method: Prediction of Flow, Spread Behavior, and Printability. Fluids 2025, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dehghanghadikolaei, A.; Abdul Halim, B.; Khoshbakhtnejad, E.; Sojoudi, H. Dynamics of a Water Droplet Impacting an Ultrathin Layer of Oil Suspended on a Pool of Water. Fluids 2024, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stober, J.L.; Santini, M.; Schulte, K. Influence of Weber Number on Crown Morphology during an Oblique Droplet Impact on a Thin Wall Film. Fluids 2023, 8, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chashechkin, Y.D.; Ilinykh, A.Y. Fine Flow Structure at the Miscible Fluids Contact Domain Boundary in the Impact Mode of Free-Falling Drop Coalescence. Fluids 2023, 8, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beloborodov, D.; Vishnyakov, A. Molecular Dynamics of Nanodroplet Coalescence in Quasi-Saturated Vapor. Fluids 2023, 8, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Croce, G.; Suzzi, N. Instability of a Film Falling Down a Bounded Plate and Its Application to Structured Packing. Fluids 2025, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasegawa, K.; Kishimoto, Y. Fingering Instability of Binary Droplets on Oil Pool. Fluids 2023, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohd Isa, N.S.; El Kadri, H.; Vigolo, D.; Mohamed Zakhari, N.F.A.; Gkatzionis, K. Understanding the Application of Emulsion Systems for Bacterial Encapsulation and Temperature-Modulated Release. Fluids 2024, 9, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Croce, G.; Suzzi, N. Numerical Simulation of Dropwise Condensation of Steam over Hybrid Surfaces via New Non-Dimensional Heat Transfer Model. Fluids 2023, 8, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lakew, E.; Sarchami, A.; Giustini, G.; Kim, H.; Bellur, K. Thin Film Evaporation Modeling of the Liquid Microlayer Region in a Dewetting Water Bubble. Fluids 2023, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carvalho, R.M.; Neto, C.; Santos, L.M.N.B.F.; Bastos, M.; Costa, J.C.S. Influence of the Deposition Rate and Substrate Temperature on the Morphology of Thermally Evaporated Ionic Liquids. Fluids 2023, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taitelbaum, H. Statistical Physics Perspective on Droplet Spreading in Reac-2 tive Wetting Interfaces. Fluids 2025, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohammad Karim, A.; Suszynski, W.J. Physics of Dynamic Contact Line: Hydrodynamics Theory versus Molecular Kinetic Theory. Fluids 2022, 7, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, T.; Liu, S.; Guo, B.; Huang, W.; Wu, Y. 3D bioprinting in cardiac tissue engineering. Theranostics 2021, 11, 7948–7969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matai, I.; Kaur, G.; Seyedsalehi, A.; McClinton, A.; Laurencin, C.T. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 2020, 226, 119536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, J.; Wehrle, E.; Rubert, M.; Muller, R. 3D Bioprinting of Human Tissues: Biofabrication, Bioinks, and Bioreactors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shukla, P.; Yeleswarapu, S.; Heinrich, M.A.; Prakash, J.; Pati, F. Mimicking tumor microenvironment by 3D bioprinting: 3D cancer modeling. Biofabrication 2022, 14, 032002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, A.; Hudson, A.R.; Shiwarski, D.J.; Tashman, J.W.; Hinton, T.J.; Yerneni, S.; Bliley, J.M.; Campbell, P.G.; Feinberg, A.W. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 2019, 365, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abbasov, I.B. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Organs: Modern Trends. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 50, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Samandari, M.; Mostafavi, A.; Quint, J.; Memic, A.; Tamayol, A. In situ bioprinting: Intraoperative implementation of regenerative medicine. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1229–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Knowlton, S.; Anand, S.; Shah, T.; Tasoglu, S. Bioprinting for Neural Tissue Engineering. Trends Neurosci. 2018, 41, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, X.; Zhang, T.; Li, Y. 3D Printing and Bioprinting Nerve Conduits for Neural Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2020, 12, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Melo, B.A.G.; Cruz, E.M.; Ribeiro, T.N.; Mundim, M.V.; Porcionatto, M.A. 3D Bioprinting of Murine Cortical Astrocytes for Engineering Neural-Like Tissue. J. Vis. Exp. 2021, 173, e62691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bedir, T.; Ulag, S.; Ustundag, C.B.; Gunduz, O. 3D bioprinting applications in neural tissue engineering for spinal cord injury repair. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 110, 110741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Warren, D.; Tomaskovic-Crook, E.; Wallace, G.G.; Crook, J.M. Engineering in vitro human neural tissue analogs by 3D bioprinting and electrostimulation. APL Bioeng. 2021, 5, 020901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yeh, Y.C.; Chen, P.Y.; Chen, K.T.; Lee, I.C. Innovative MXene/SilMA-Based Conductive Bioink for Three Dimensional Bioprinting of Neural Stem Cell Spheroids in Neural Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 10402–10416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sharma, R.; Restan Perez, M.; da Silva, V.A.; Thomsen, J.; Bhardwaj, L.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Alhussan, A.; Willerth, S.M. 3D bioprinting complex models of cancer. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 3414–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olejnik, A.; Semba, J.A.; Kulpa, A.; Danczak-Pazdrowska, A.; Rybka, J.D.; Gornowicz-Porowska, J. 3D Bioprinting in Skin Related Research: Recent Achievements and Application Perspectives. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Y.; Ravnic, D.J.; Ozbolat, I.T. Intraoperative Bioprinting: Repairing Tissues and Organs in a Surgical Setting. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quadri, F.; Soman, S.S.; Vijayavenkataraman, S. Progress in cardiovascular bioprinting. Artif. Organs. 2021, 45, 652–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moldovan, N.I. Progress in scaffold-free bioprinting for cardiovascular medicine. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 2964–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, Z.; Zhao, J.; Leung, E.; Flandes-Iparraguirre, M.; Vernon, M.; Silberstein, J.; De-Juan-Pardo, E.M.; Jansen, S. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Correia Carreira, S.; Begum, R.; Perriman, A.W. 3D Bioprinting: The Emergence of Programmable Biodesign. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e1900554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ravanbakhsh, H.; Karamzadeh, V.; Bao, G.; Mongeau, L.; Juncker, D.; Zhang, Y.S. Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sabzevari, A.; Rayat Pisheh, H.; Ansari, M.; Salati, A. Progress in bioprinting technology for tissue regeneration. J. Artif. Organs. 2023, 26, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chae, S.; Cho, D.W. Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2023, 156, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jiu, J.; Liu, H.; Li, D.; Li, J.; Liu, L.; Yang, W.; Yan, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; et al. 3D bioprinting approaches for spinal cord injury repair. Biofabrication 2024, 16, 032003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Herzog, J.; Franke, L.; Lai, Y.; Gomez Rossi, P.; Sachtleben, J.; Weuster-Botz, D. 3D bioprinting of microorganisms: Principles and applications. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 47, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kang, M.S.; Jang, J.; Jo, H.J.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, B.; Chun, H.J.; Lim, D.; Han, D.W. Advances and Innovations of 3D Bioprinting Skin. Biomolecules 2022, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hong, N.; Yang, G.H.; Lee, J.; Kim, G. 3D bioprinting and its in vivo applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2018, 106, 444–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, E.P.; Toksoy, Z.; Davis, B.A.; Geibel, J.P. 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized Tissues for in vitro and in vivo Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 664188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Caceres-Alban, J.; Sanchez, M.; Casado, F.L. Bioprinting: A Strategy to Build Informative Models of Exposure and Disease. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 16, 594–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Y.; Kennedy, P.; Bonazza, N.; Yu, Y.; Dhawan, A.; Ozbolat, I. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage: A Systematic Review. Cartilage 2021, 12, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ballard, A.; Patush, R.; Perez, J.; Juarez, C.; Kirillova, A. Bioprinting: Mechanical Stabilization and Reinforcement Strategies in Regenerative Medicine. Tissue Eng. Part A 2024, 30, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Knowlton, S.; Onal, S.; Yu, C.H.; Zhao, J.J.; Tasoglu, S. Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. De Stefano, P.; Briatico-Vangosa, F.; Bianchi, E.; Pellegata, A.F.; Hartung de Hartungen, A.; Corti, P.; Dubini, G. Bioprinting of Matrigel Scaffolds for Cancer Research. Polymers 2021, 13, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, Y.; Datta, P.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Ozbolat, I.T. 3D Bioprinting of Tumor Models for Cancer Research. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 5552–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khorsandi, D.; Rezayat, D.; Sezen, S.; Ferrao, R.; Khosravi, A.; Zarepour, A.; Khorsandi, M.; Hashemian, M.; Iravani, S.; Zarrabi, A. Application of 3D, 4D, 5D, and 6D bioprinting in cancer research: What does the future look like? J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 4584–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Leonard, F.; Godin, B. 3D In Vitro Model for Breast Cancer Research Using Magnetic Levitation and Bioprinting Method. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1406, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bhardwaj, N.; Yadav, S.K.; Saneja, A. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for cancer research: From precision models to personalized therapies. Drug Discov. Today 2024, 29, 103924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H. Revolutionizing preclinical research for pancreatic cancer: The potential of 3D bioprinting technology for personalized therapy. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2023, 12, 616–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, H.; Yang, K.H.; Narayan, R.J.; Ma, S. Laser-based bioprinting for multilayer cell patterning in tissue engineering and cancer research. Essays Biochem. 2021, 65, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Goodarzi Hosseinabadi, H.; Dogan, E.; Miri, A.K.; Ionov, L. Digital Light Processing Bioprinting Advances for Microtissue Models. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, S.; Hou, Y.; Shang, Y.; Zhong, X. BPNN and CNN-based AI modeling of spreading and icing pattern of a water droplet impact on a supercooled surface. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 045209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Modak, C.D.; Kumar, A.; Tripathy, A.; Sen, P. Drop impact printing. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qu, J.; Dou, C.; Xu, B.; Li, J.; Rao, Z.; Tsin, A. Printing quality improvement for laser-induced forward transfer bioprinting: Numerical modeling and experimental validation. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 071906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dasgupta, Q.; Black, L.D. A fresh slate for 3D bioprinting. Science 2019, 365, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mandrycky, C.; Wang, Z.; Kim, K.; Kim, D.H. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Starly, B.; Shirwaiker, R. 3D bioprinting techniques. In 3D Bioprinting Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering Regenerative Medicine; Zhang, L.G., Fisher, J.P., Leong, K.W., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  61. Choi, Y.; Jin, P.; Lee, S.; Song, Y.; Tay, R.Y.; Kim, G.; Yoo, J.; Han, H.; Yeom, J.; Cho, J.H.; et al. All-printed chip-less wearable neuromorphic system for multimodal physiochemical health monitoring. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dey, M.; Ozbolat, I.T. 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and organs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Van Ombergen, A.; Chalupa-Gantner, F.; Chansoria, P.; Colosimo, B.M.; Costantini, M.; Domingos, M.; Dufour, A.; De Maria, C.; Groll, J.; Jungst, T.; et al. 3D Bioprinting in Microgravity: Opportunities, Challenges, and Possible Applications in Space. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2300443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rezapour Sarabi, M.; Yetisen, A.K.; Tasoglu, S. Bioprinting in Microgravity. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 3074–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gungor-Ozkerim, P.S.; Inci, I.; Zhang, Y.S.; Khademhosseini, A.; Dokmeci, M.R. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 915–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, H.; Hao, H.; Ding, L.; Li, H.; Gu, Y.; Ma, J.; et al. An Overview of Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 905438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kravchenko, S.V.; Sakhnov, S.N.; Myasnikova, V.V.; Trofimenko, A.I.; Buzko, V.Y. Bioprinting technologies in ophthalmology. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2023, 139, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sun, W.; Starly, B.; Daly, A.C.; Burdick, J.A.; Groll, J.; Skeldon, G.; Shu, W.; Sakai, Y.; Shinohara, M.; Nishikawa, M.; et al. The bioprinting roadmap. Biofabrication 2020, 12, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ikram, M.; Mahmud, M.A.P.; Kalyar, A.A.; Alomayri, T.; Almahri, A.; Hussain, D. 3D-bioprinting of MXenes: Developments, medical applications, challenges, and future roadmap. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2025, 251, 114568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, Y.; Qin, M.; Yang, X. Organ bioprinting: Progress, challenges and outlook. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 10263–10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lam, E.H.Y.; Yu, F.; Zhu, S.; Wang, Z. 3D Bioprinting for Next-Generation Personalized Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. McMillan, A.; McMillan, N.; Gupta, N.; Kanotra, S.P.; Salem, A.K. 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2203268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mierke, C.T. Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues. Cells 2024, 13, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Banerjee, D.; Singh, Y.P.; Datta, P.; Ozbolat, V.; O’Donnell, A.; Yeo, M.; Ozbolat, I.T. Strategies for 3D bioprinting of spheroids: A comprehensive review. Biomaterials 2022, 291, 121881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Memic, A.; Navaei, A.; Mirani, B.; Cordova, J.A.V.; Aldhahri, M.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Akbari, M.; Nikkhah, M. Bioprinting technologies for disease modeling. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017, 39, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Genova, T.; Roato, I.; Carossa, M.; Motta, C.; Cavagnetto, D.; Mussano, F. Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fransen, M.F.J.; Addario, G.; Bouten, C.V.C.; Halary, F.; Moroni, L.; Mota, C. Bioprinting of kidney in vitro models: Cells, biomaterials, and manufacturing techniques. Essays Biochem. 2021, 65, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chawla, S.; Midha, S.; Sharma, A.; Ghosh, S. Silk-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, e1701204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Samadi, A.; Moammeri, A.; Pourmadadi, M.; Abbasi, P.; Hosseinpour, Z.; Farokh, A.; Shamsabadipour, A.; Heydari, M.; Mohammadi, M.R. Cell Encapsulation and 3D Bioprinting for Therapeutic Cell Transplantation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 1862–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Di Piazza, E.; Pandolfi, E.; Cacciotti, I.; Del Fattore, A.; Tozzi, A.E.; Secinaro, A.; Borro, L. Bioprinting Technology in Skin, Heart, Pancreas and Cartilage Tissues: Progress and Challenges in Clinical Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, P.; Zhang, W.; Smith, L.J.; Ayares, D.; Cooper, D.K.C.; Ekser, B. The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2019, 24, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Murphy, S.V.; De Coppi, P.; Atala, A. Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 4, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Skeldon, G.; Lucendo-Villarin, B.; Shu, W. Three-dimensional bioprinting of stem-cell derived tissues for human regenerative medicine. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20170224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tharakan, S.; Khondkar, S.; Ilyas, A. Bioprinting of Stem Cells in Multimaterial Scaffolds and Their Applications in Bone Tissue Engineering. Sensors 2021, 21, 7477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ali, M.; PR, A.; Lee, S.J.; Jackson, J.D. Three-dimensional bioprinting for organ bioengineering: Promise and pitfalls. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2018, 23, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sabetkish, S.; Currie, P.; Meagher, L. Recent trends in 3D bioprinting technology for skeletal muscle regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2024, 181, 46–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Holland, I. Extrusion bioprinting: Meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication? Prog. Biomed. Eng. 2025, 7, 023001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kim, D.Y.; Liu, Y.; Kim, G.; An, S.B.; Han, I. Innovative Strategies in 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Y.; Wu, J.; He, C.; He, H.; Xie, M.; Yao, K.; He, J.; Duan, Y.; Zhaung, L.; Wang, P.; et al. 3D Prestress Bioprinting of Directed Tissues. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2301487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Germain, N.; Dhayer, M.; Dekiouk, S.; Marchetti, P. Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammad Karim, A. Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading. Fluids 2025, 10, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080206

AMA Style

Mohammad Karim A. Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading. Fluids. 2025; 10(8):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammad Karim, Alireza. 2025. "Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading" Fluids 10, no. 8: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080206

APA Style

Mohammad Karim, A. (2025). Contact Line Dynamics and Droplet Spreading. Fluids, 10(8), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop