Next Article in Journal
Modelling and Simulation of the Entrapment of Non-Wetting Fluids Within Disordered Porous Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Sediment Erosion of a Centrifugal Pump During Startup and Shutdown Processes Considering of Transient Flow in Pump Station
Previous Article in Journal
Vortex Dynamics Effects on the Development of a Confined Turbulent Wake
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cavitation–Velocity Correlation in Cavitating Flows Around a Clark-Y Hydrofoil Using a Data-Driven U-Net
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modeling of the Nose Landing Gear Shock Absorber for Carrier-Based Aircraft and Optimization of Oil Orifice Area Configuration

School of Basic Sciences for Aviation, Naval Aeronautical University, Yantai 264001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2025, 10(11), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110285
Submission received: 12 September 2025 / Revised: 29 October 2025 / Accepted: 29 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiphase Flow and Fluid Machinery)

Abstract

To optimize and improve the nose landing gear shock absorber of a fixed-wing carrier-based aircraft, the cross-sectional area of the oil needle in the main oil orifice and the cross-sectional area of the oil return orifice shall be reconfigured. Firstly, a dynamic analysis of a single landing shock absorber system is conducted, with a focus on explaining the calculation methods for air spring force and oil damping force. Secondly, the shock absorber is modeled and its typical working processes are simulated, including calculations of shipboard landing buffering results under different sinking speeds and catapult extension results under different terminal drag speeds. Phenomena such as wheel transition oscillation and shock absorber hysteresis compression are interpreted. Finally, an orifice area configuration optimization scheme based on the work-energy diagram of the shock absorber system is proposed, with principles and necessary explanations for key steps in the scheme provided. The optimized scheme, which comprehensively considers buffering and extension performance, is applied to a single shock absorber system model for verification. The results show that the main orifice area should exhibit a slight increase near the critical stroke of the high and low pressure chambers. After optimizing the orifice area, under the ultimate sinking speed, the peak load of the shock absorber is reduced by 12.92%, the compression stroke is decreased by 2.91%, and the energy absorption efficiency is increased by 19.90%; the peak load of the tire is reduced by 12.17%, the compression stroke is decreased by 5.92%, and the energy absorption efficiency is increased by 12.28%.
Keywords: shock absorber; air spring; oil damping; shipboard landing buffering; transition oscillation; orifice area shock absorber; air spring; oil damping; shipboard landing buffering; transition oscillation; orifice area

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Zhao, B.; Pan, X.; Song, Z.; Wang, P. Modeling of the Nose Landing Gear Shock Absorber for Carrier-Based Aircraft and Optimization of Oil Orifice Area Configuration. Fluids 2025, 10, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110285

AMA Style

Liu W, Zhao B, Pan X, Song Z, Wang P. Modeling of the Nose Landing Gear Shock Absorber for Carrier-Based Aircraft and Optimization of Oil Orifice Area Configuration. Fluids. 2025; 10(11):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wenlin, Boxing Zhao, Xiangning Pan, Zhijie Song, and Ping Wang. 2025. "Modeling of the Nose Landing Gear Shock Absorber for Carrier-Based Aircraft and Optimization of Oil Orifice Area Configuration" Fluids 10, no. 11: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110285

APA Style

Liu, W., Zhao, B., Pan, X., Song, Z., & Wang, P. (2025). Modeling of the Nose Landing Gear Shock Absorber for Carrier-Based Aircraft and Optimization of Oil Orifice Area Configuration. Fluids, 10(11), 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10110285

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop