Next Article in Journal
Advances in Hemostatic Hydrogels That Can Adhere to Wet Surfaces
Next Article in Special Issue
Enrichment of 3D-Printed k-Carrageenan Food Gel with Callus Tissue of Narrow-Leaved Lupin Lupinus angustifolius
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of an LZ-OEO Compound Antibacterial Gel and the Effect of Microwave Treatment on Its Structure and Stability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enrichment of Agar Gel with Antioxidant Pectin from Fireweed: Mechanical and Rheological Properties, Simulated Digestibility, and Oral Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review of Food Hydrogels: Principles, Formation Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Its Applications

by
Pinku Chandra Nath
1,
Shubhankar Debnath
1,
Kandi Sridhar
2,
Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj
3,
Prakash Kumar Nayak
4,* and
Minaxi Sharma
5,*
1
Department of Bio Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Agartala 799046, India
2
Department of Food Technology, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram 522502, India
3
Department of Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
4
Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Central Institute of Technology Kokrajhar, Kokrajhar 783370, India
5
Haute Ecole Provinciale de Hainaut-Condorcet, 11, Rue de la Sucrerie, 7800 Ath, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Food Gels)

Abstract

:
Food hydrogels are effective materials of great interest to scientists because they are safe and beneficial to the environment. Hydrogels are widely used in the food industry due to their three-dimensional crosslinked networks. They have also attracted a considerable amount of attention because they can be used in many different ways in the food industry, for example, as fat replacers, target delivery vehicles, encapsulating agents, etc. Gels—particularly proteins and polysaccharides—have attracted the attention of food scientists due to their excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, nutritional properties, and edibility. Thus, this review is focused on the nutritional importance, microstructure, mechanical characteristics, and food hydrogel applications of gels. This review also focuses on the structural configuration of hydrogels, which implies future potential applications in the food industry. The findings of this review confirm the application of different plant- and animal-based polysaccharide and protein sources as gelling agents. Gel network structure is improved by incorporating polysaccharides for encapsulation of bioactive compounds. Different hydrogel-based formulations are widely used for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds, food texture perception, risk monitoring, and food packaging applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In order to develop novel and innovative consumer-based functional foods, food processing industries are facing numerous challenges. Recent food processing trends are based on ensuring food safety and nutritional value to safeguard consumers. Furthermore, under proper storage, shipping, and delivery circumstances, the longevity of a product can be extended [1]. Researchers are creating new forms of food matrices that can be synthesized artificially [2] or with the assistance of different microbes [3], plants [4], or insects to assure quality and safety [5]. Foods with gelation characteristics have recently become much more popular in the marketplace due to their delicious taste, features that increase satiety, low calorie content, and high moisture content. These factors combine to make these foods healthier. In addition, rheological properties and sensory qualities of food hydrogels are essential for their excellent market price [6]. Natural gels made from food biopolymers have made significant strides over the past few decades, and in comparison, to their synthetic analogs, they have a wider range of applications and superior properties in a variety of contexts.
Gels are colloidal systems containing a continuous phase (i.e., a solid matrix) and a dispersed phase (i.e., aqueous solvent), leading to the formation of a semisolid texture [7]. The biopolymers that make up these gels are the primary ingredient that gives them their structure. Polysaccharides and proteins are the two types of biopolymers that are most frequently used. These biopolymers provide a variety of food products with a semisolid consistency. These biopolymer-based gels are composed of networks of various shapes, such as blocks, particles, or fibers, which exhibit a range of behaviors when subjected to mechanical stress [8].
Hydrogels are 3D polymer networks that are elastic because they are bound together by weaker bonding forces in the form of hydrogen or ionic bonds and crosslinked covalent bonds. These factors contribute to the ability of hydrogels to hold their shape. Hydrogels are used in current food design for a variety of purposes, including the creation of complex shapes through 3D printing, the replacement of fats, increased satiety with less food, and the maintenance of metastable structures of products [9]. Gels are also effective for reducing the unpleasant tastes induced by several bioactive compounds and medications because gel formation limits or slows molecular transport [10]. On the other hand, the use of flavor enhancers such as salt and sugar can be reduced by using liquid or brittle gels, which intensify the flavor [11]. If a gel is to be fully integrated into a liquid without altering the flavor of the food, its size must be drastically reduced before it can be used in liquid foods, such as beverages.
In order to satisfy the worldwide demand for food and provide sustenance for the growing human population, several food products that are environmentally friendly, inexpensive, safe, and packed with nutrients are required. In this context, food gels are considered sustainable food matrices containing a high concentration of nutrients. The employment of hydrogels mostly in the industry of food technology is not nearly as widespread as it is in other branches of the scientific community, such as tissue engineering and biomedicine. Therefore, the design of the structure of food hydrogels will require investigation of additional functional applications in order to advance the development of functional foods. Owing to the widespread sensorial acceptance of these medicinal and healthful foods, which were made possible by incorporating food gels, an increase in consumption of such food products has been observed [12]. When utilizing gels in food production systems, it is vital to consider how these substances will react inside the body. As a result, it is essential to take a number of factors into consideration in order to control the discharge or retainment of bioactive substances across the digestive system [13]. Enzymes and the acidic atmosphere of the stomach present the most significant challenge to maintaining the integrity of the shell for subsequent passages through the gastrointestinal tract because the stomach is the first organ that the shell must pass through [14]. Therefore, it is expected that the smart layout of the structure of the hydrogel will lead to an increase in the number of useful applications for new food items. In this review, we focused on the possible implementations and hydrogel interactions pertaining to the microstructure of various hydrogels and their food applications. The novelty of this review lies in the understating of the formation, rheological characteristics, and impact of the microstructure of hydrogels. An understanding of the interlaying mechanism of hydrogels could provide an opportunity for a wider range of applications in the food industry.

2. Gelling Agents

Gelling agents are added to a wide range of foods, such as jellybeans, sweets, and chocolates, to make them thicker and more stable. As a result of gel formation, these ingredients give such foods their distinctive textures. In addition to their other functions, stabilizers and thickeners can also act as gelling agents. The application of plant- and animal-based proteins as gelling agents in the food industry is illustrated in Figure 1. Only a small fraction of gums can be used to make gels, and even among those that can be used for such purposes, there is a wide range of gel characteristics and textures that dictates their use in different food contexts. Natural gums, enzymes, pectins, starches, and agars are just some of the proteins and polysaccharides used as gelling agents. Heteropolysaccharides and hydrocolloids make up the vast majority of gelling polysaccharides (Table 1). Structures can be complex but well-defined repeating units, block copolymers, or either regularly or irregularly branched structures. They come from various sources, such as plant, animal, and microbial sources in nature. Gel formation is the primary focus, although thickening is a possible side effect. Jams, jellies, salad dressings, desserts, marmalade, jujubes, yogurts, etc., are just a few of the uses. However, many proteins are also employed in gel fabrication (Table 2). Corn zein and various animal proteins such as gelatin and whey are among these.

3. Conditions Necessary for the Formation of Gels

Gel formation occurs as a consequence of the combination of a straightforward polymer dispersion or particle suspension with an extrinsically modifiable temperature or solution composition [16]. As a consequence of this, the process of converting sol-gels typically involves the aggregation of either particles or macromolecules, with the end result being the formation of a network that encompasses the entire volume of the container [15,17]. Gelation reactions can be roughly classified into two categories: those that are driven by physical forces (e.g., heat and pressure) and those that are induced by chemical processes (e.g., acidic, ionic, and enzymatic processes) [18,19]. The gelation of proteins requires a driving force to unfold the native protein structure, followed by an aggregation process, resulting in a three-dimensional organized network of aggregates or strands of molecules crosslinked by non-covalent bonds or, less frequently, by covalent bonds [20]. The numerous physicochemical characteristics covered in the subsequent sections are the primary determinants of the conditions that must exist for gel to form [21]. Figure 2 depicts the primary factors that influence the formation of gels and further information on each of these factors is addressed below in this section.
Figure 2. Different factors affecting the formation of food hydrogels.
Figure 2. Different factors affecting the formation of food hydrogels.
Gels 09 00001 g002
Table 1. Sources of gelling agents, as well as their textures, rheological properties, and applications.
Table 1. Sources of gelling agents, as well as their textures, rheological properties, and applications.
Gelling Agent and ConcentrationSourceTexture and Rheological PropertiesBinding BlocksApplicationsRef
Pectin (0.5–1%, w/w)Heteropolysaccharides from higher terrestrial plant cell walls and fruits, such as citrus fruit, guava, and appleNewtonian behaviorPartially esterified α-(1–4)-linked D-galactouronic and mannuronic acid; rhamnose, galactose, and arabinose can replace galacturonic acidJelly, jam, marmalade, fruit chews, and yogurt[22]
Cellulose
(0.5–2%, w/w)
Chemically modified plant cell wallsShear thining crossmodelling and viscoelastic behaviorHomopolymer of D-glucose β-(1, 4)Sweets and salad dressings[22,23]
Agar (1–2%, w/w)Red algae or seaweedsThermoreversible gels upon cooling; lowest viscosity at low shear rates; with increasing concentration of agarose, the particle size and particle surface decreaseUtilization of agarose and agaropectin together in a single productVegetarian gelatin and laxative[22,24]
Guar gum
(1–5%, w/w)
EndospermAlthough it is independent of electrolytes and has extremely high low-shear viscosity and high-shear thinning, it degrades and loses viscosity at high temperatures and low pHGalactomannan molecular sequenceSweets, yogurt, and various forms of liquid cheese, along with fillings for pastries[25,26]
Carrageenan
(0.5–3%, w/w)
Red seaweedsHigh hardness, compressibility, adhesiveness, and cohesivenessSulfated D-galactose and L-anhydrogalactoseDesserts, cell/enzyme immobilization gel[27,28]
Carob gum or locust bean gum (0.16–1.84%, w/w)Carob tree seedsHigh-shear thinning; very high low-shear viscosity, despite being degraded and losing viscosity regardless of the presence of electrolytes at high and low pH levels and high temperaturesGalactomannanGlue[29]
Xanthan gum
(1–3%, w/w)
Xanthomonas campestris is responsible for the process of fermenting glucose, as well as sucroseHigh-shear thinnability; maintains viscosity in the presence of electrolytes, high temperatures, and a wide pH rangeTwo -D-glucose units are linked at positions 1 and 4 along the polysaccharide chain; the primary structure has two mannose and one glucouronic acid, forming repeating modules of five sugar moleculesAs emulsifiers, texture modifiers, fruit salads, and sauces, colloidal oil and solid ingredients are kept from turning into a cream[30,31]
Alginate
(1–2%, w/w)
Brown seaweedsPseudoplastic non-Newtonian and viscoelastic behaviorDifferent arrangements of (1-4)-linked -D-mannuronate and its C-5 epimer α-L-guluronate residues form a linear copolymerAppetite-suppressant jellies, divalent ionic gelation, cell immobilization, and encapsulation[32,33]
Gum Arabic
(1–5%, w/w)
Acacia senegal and Acacia seyal sapLow-viscosity gum; shear thinning occurs at low shear rates below 10/s, and near-Newtonian behavior occurs above shear rates of 100/sCombination of saccharides and glycoproteinsHard gummies, chocolates, and gums[34,35]
Table 2. Application of proteins as gelling agents.
Table 2. Application of proteins as gelling agents.
Gelling AgentsSourceBinding BlocksApplicationsRef
Whey proteinAcid/sweet dairy wheyβ-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbuminThickener and gelling agent[36]
Soya proteinsSoybeansGlycinin and β-conglycinin interactHeat-set gel[37]
Egg proteinsEggAlbumen is made up of almost 70% globular proteins with ovomucin fibers and 30% egg whiteConfectionery gelling and bulking agent[38]
ZeinCornPeptide chain (prolamine)Encapsulations in candies, nuts, fruit, and pills, along with other foods and baked products[39]
GelatinAnimal skin and bonesGlycine–proline proteinJelly, jam, yogurt, and margarine[40]

3.1. Pressure

Because high pressure may be used by itself or in conjunction with other processes, such as elevated temperatures, it provides more options for tailoring the functional molecular properties. Reactions that reduce the volume of a system are generally favored under high pressure. Dissociation of water at high pressure lowers its pH value. Gels formed under heat or pressure has distinct visual and rheological properties [41].

3.2. pH

The addition of acids or the fermentation of microorganisms can cause changes in pH, and these changes can alter the net charge of the molecule, which, in turn, can change the attractive and repulsive forces that exist between molecules, as well as the interactions among molecules and the solvent, also known as the hydration properties. In addition, the solubility of salts shifts depending on the pH, which is another factor that might play a role in gel formation. The theory of fractal aggregation may provide an explanation for the technique underlying the formation of acid gel [42].

3.3. Ionic Strength

A gel’s band gap can be increased by incorporating monovalent and divalent cations such as Na and Ca into the mixture. Gelation is possible as a result of the reduction or neutralization of the electrostatic repulsive forces that normally exist between molecules. It has been reported that pre-denatured whey proteins can undergo ionically induced gelation, which, in contrast to heat-induced gelation, is referred to as cold gelation [43,44]. In polysaccharide gels, such as xanthan gum, glucans, or guar gum, ionically induced gelation plays a more significant role than in other types of gels.

3.4. Temperature

The majority of gels are obtained by heating their constituents to a critical temperature [45]. The first step in the gelation process is uncovering or molecular fragmentation in response to the energy required, which exposes the reactive sites. Step two involves the joining or sticking together of unfolded compounds to make complexes with a higher molecular weight. Whereas the first process might be reversible; the second is almost always irreversible. Hydrophobic interactions and disulfide (-S-S-) bridges are likely to play essential roles. According to the relative reaction rates of the individual steps over a given temperature range, the unfolding or aggregation reaction can dictate the overall reaction rate.

3.5. Availability of Enzymes

Enzymes control complex procedures and active interaction in natural systems and their potential for building self-regulating soft matter systems is growing [46]. Enzymatically induced gelation works by adding artificial covalent cross links to food proteins. Protein crosslinking works best with reactions set off by transglutaminase (TG), polyphenol oxidase, and lipoxygenase [47].

3.6. Gelling Agent Concentration

Gel formation is only possible once the critical minimum concentration (denoted by the symbol C), which is unique to each hydrocolloid, has been reached. Agarose can form gels at concentrations as low as 0.2%, whereas acid-thinned starch requires a concentration of at least 15% before gels can be formed [48].

3.7. Solvent Quality

The nature and presence of solvent has a significant effect on gel formation; for instance, concentrated sugar solution is an ineffective solvent for pectin [47]. Only in a concentrated sugar solution can hydrogen bonds form in the junction zones, so gelation can only occur in this type of solvent [49].

4. Gel Types and Mechanism of Gel Formation

Food gels can be categorized in various ways based on their biopolymer networks, gelation mechanisms, morphologies, interactions, etc. Gel structures can be classified either as simple networks (made up of a single biopolymer such as polysaccharides or proteins) binary/mixed networks (made up of two or more biopolymer types), or composite/filled networks (made up of a biopolymer network and various other particles such as fat globules) [18]. Cold-set gels, heat-set gels, ionotropic gels, acid or enzymatically induced gels, etc., are all distinct types of gels that form for different reasons. Gels can be classified as either filamentous or crystalline or as a soft particle suspension, depending on their morphological characteristics.
Gels may contain a variety of interactions, including hydrogen bonding, interactions involving hydrophobic groups, non-covalent interactions, and covalent chemical bonds. Among the many types of chemical bonds, H-bonding is the most common type of interaction. Polymer gels can be divided into three categories: strong, weak, and pseudogels, all of which are fundamentally determined by the three-dimensional layout of the biopolymer network [7]. Hybrid gels of polymers that have been subjected to chemical crosslinking are regarded as particularly robust gels. The crosslinks in these gels are irreversible and cannot be repaired if they become broken. Colloidal gels and certain biopolymer gels are examples of weak gels that contain crosslinks that are capable of being broken and reformed [50,51]. Long-lasting physical interactions within the polymer matrix can function like chemical crosslinks, which gives these materials gel-like properties. Therefore, polymer systems that get tangled up are sometimes called “pseudogels” [51]. If the stress is kept constant, the steady-state response of a pseudogel to an extreme stress is to flow like a fluid. It is possible that different criteria could be used to classify food gels; however, in order to make it simpler to comprehend the methodology of gelation and the microstructure of gels, in this chapter, we describe gels based on the category of the biopolymer system they contain.
As previously stated, gelling agents include any of the polysaccharides and proteins found in plants, animals, and microbes [52]. Polysaccharides, also known as natural gums, are used frequently in the food industry and include ingredients such as agar, guar gum, alginate, xanthan gum, starches, and glucans. The most popular proteins contain pectin, glutenin, skim milk, soy milk, egg albumin, and zein. Many of these proteins and polysaccharides are employed as thickeners in culinary creations. The viscosity and shear modulus can differentiate between thickening and gelling. Gel formers usually increase the solubility until the gel point, when the viscosity becomes (possibly) infinite and the elastic modulus above the gel point is finite [53]. The first steps in the gelling process are the uniform dispersion of the gelling agent, followed by the hydration of the agent. The subsequent formation of the network is responsible for giving the product its texture.

4.1. Polysaccharide Gels

There are just few polysaccharides that can form a gel when exposed to a certain concentration of the gelling agent, which is typically referred to as the critical concentration. Other polysaccharides, on the other hand, are utilized in various foods as thickeners and stabilizers. Polysaccharide critical concentrations are significantly lower than those of protein critical concentrations. After polysaccharides have been completely hydrated, the polymer strands begin interacting (crosslinking) with one another in order to produce junction zones. When the polymer solution (dispersion) reaches a certain critical polymer concentration and a certain degree of crosslinking, the polymer solution eventually transforms into a gel that possesses a stable network structure. The composition of the polysaccharide and the conditions under which the gel is formed can result in a wide variety of junction zone configurations (Figure 3). Some polysaccharides, known as thermos or heat-set gels, crystallize when heated and then cooled again, whereas other polysaccharides, known as cold-set gels, do so at room temperature by utilizing particular types of cations, adjusting the pH of the solution, or incorporating particular cosolutes. Curdlan is a special polysaccharide because it can produce gels that are heat-set as well as cold-set. This ability sets it apart from other polysaccharides [54]. In the following sections, we discuss polysaccharide gels, which are utilized the vast majority of the time [55].

4.1.1. Alginate

In the presence of divalent cations, alginate gels are produced, and the strength of the resulting gels is directly proportional to the type of cation used. Ca++-induced gelation is the most significant among the various cation-induced gelations for functional foods [56]. In general, alginate gels are not affected by heat and are irreversible. Egg-box structures are formed when cations begin a linkage among polyglucuronic acid regions of adjacent polymers. This linkage occurs because buckled conformations in the polymers provide efficient binding sites. Egg-box structures are also known as egg crates. Because alginates can form a gel even when the temperature is just above room temperature, they can be used in a variety of food applications.

4.1.2. Pectin

The degree of esterification of pectin significantly impacts the gelling properties exhibited by pectin [57]. Pectin’s with a high methoxyl content only set into a gel when sugars or other cosolutes are present [58], such as carbohydrates, polyols, or monohydric alcohols, and with a sufficiently low acid concentration (3.0 to 4.5) [59]. Low-methoxyl pectins are capable to formgel in the presence of divalent compounds, such as calcium.

4.1.3. Agar

In both bacterial media and food products, agar gels experience a synergistic effect [60]. Agarose, a neutral polysaccharide, and agaropectin, a charged polysaccharide with sulfate groups, combine to form an agar gel. Accordingly, the gel osmotic pressure increases, and the degree of syneresis decreases as the agaropectin fraction increases [61]. In most cases, the total sulfate content has an inverse proportional relationship with the amount of water extracted from the agar gel. The total polymer concentration in the gel follows the same pattern. Intriguingly, the extent of syneresis in agar gel was found to be roughly inversely proportional to the square of the concentration. The uncharged polymer’s osmotic pressure scales approximately to this value.

4.1.4. Starch

Amylose, a linear chain, and amylopectin, which is branched, are the two types of polymers that make up starch granules (branched) [62]. Granules are embedded within an amylose matrix in the composite gel that is formed as a result of its formation. A process known as gelatinization is responsible for the gelation of starch. During this process, starch granules are heated, which causes them to absorb a sufficient amount of liquid and swell to several times their original size. After being cooled, the amylose fraction becomes ordered (in the form of single helices) around the swollen granules and is leached out by the granules. The method that causes the starch to gel differs depending on the source of the starch; for example, chitosan-based hydrogel and its mechanism are illustrated in Figure 4A.

4.1.5. Carrageenan

Carrageenan is a type of ionic polymer that, when cooled in the presence of salts (electrolytes), particularly potassium ions, forms helical gels. Both the formation of helices and the setting of gels can be facilitated by particular cations, such as K+, Rb+, Cs+, and NH4+. A coil–helix transition is experienced by molecules, followed by the aggregation of helices [63]. The formation of “ordered domains” is a common step in carrageenan gelation [64], which typically involves the association of polymer chains through the formation of intermolecular double helices. Gelation takes place after the subsequent aggregation of these domains, which is mediated by the specific binding of the cations that are responsible for gelation. The transformation of carrageenan from its disordered, random coil state into its ordered, helical state is the first step in the gelation process [65].

4.1.6. Gellan Gum

In terms of their chemical composition, gellan gums can be broken down into two categories: high- and low-acyl gellan gums [66]. Gels with high-acyl gellan tend to be soft and elastic, whereas gels with low-acyl gellan tend to be hard and brittle [67]. The presence of ions facilitates the association of double helices, which, in turn, leads to gelation.

4.1.7. Cellulose Derivative Gels

Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC)

CMC is a water-soluble cellulose derivative widely used in the biopolymer industry. It is produced by replacing 2, 3, and 6 hydroxyls on the backbone of cellulose with carboxymethyl groups [68]. Cellulose containing numerous hydroxyl groups is an abundant and inexpensive natural biopolymer, making it a desirable starting material. CMC also exhibits bioactivity, solubility, and biodegradability. CMC is prepared in a nonaqueous monochloroacetic acid/soda solvent medium to achieve the substitution degree via carboxymethylation [69].
CMC-based hydrogel has the potential for use in enzyme immobilization [70], wound healing [71], drug delivery [72], and adsorption [73]. Hydrogels from nanoparticles/CMC can be used for their antimicrobial properties [74], wound healing, drug development, and tissue engineering [75]. The performance of carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel is enhanced by the addition of nanoparticles [76]. Nanoparticles enhance carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels by virtue of their superior mechanical, electronic, optical, and physicochemical properties. Carboxymethyl cellulose derived from pineapple plants is an effective vehicle for papain immobilization and forms a strong hydrogen bond between the employed materials [77]. Although CMC can be easily extracted from biomass resources [78], bagasse [79] and empty fruit bunch [80] have also been used to produce carboxymethyl cellulose. Every type of biomass resource imparts unique characteristics to CMC, such as exceptional absorption and adsorption, a high swelling ability, and superior optical properties. In addition to being advantageous for the production of CMC hydrogels, a high level of methylation groups in various types of biomass waste is also beneficial [81].

Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)

Cellulose derivative HPMC is utilized extensively in controlled-release applications, owing to its ability to thicken, gel, and swell. It is also safe to use, easy to compress, has properties that make it swell, and can handle high drug levels.
Owing to its excellent bioactivity, HPMC can be a thermosensitive natural polymer that forms a transparent, highly stable, colorless hydrogel, with positive rheological properties and changes in the texture. Gårdebjer et al. [82] investigated the pore-forming effects of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, mostly in MFC (micro fibrillated cellulose) film, and made adjustments to the wettability characteristics of the films. The results demonstrate that HPMC can potently react with MFC films, possibly creating H-bonds on the surface of the film.
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose for use in scaffold engineering was created from crosslinked chitosan by Boyer et al. [83]. After promoting cellular characteristics, they demonstrated that crosslinking hydroxypropyl methylcellulose with chitosan can endow the recovery process with structural strength and shape. The use of HPMC as a composite hydrogel in scaffold engineering was also investigated by Bacakova et al. [84]. Likewise, HPMC is widely used to make composite hydrogels using different polysaccharides (Figure 4B). Overall, HPMC composite hydrogel can facilitate faster healing, a more uniform distribution of cells, and a reduced risk of complications during osteoplasty procedures. Hydrogel scaffolds, films, and membranes are some of the typical applications for HPMC in the sector of medicine.

Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC)

HPC can be dissolved in ice-cold water, and its viscosity changes with pressure. Temperatures higher than 45 °C render HPC insoluble, and unlike MC and HPMC, it does not form a gel. HPC, on the other hand, may be soluble in ethanol and ethanol/water mixtures. A reversible precipitation process begins when the polymer reaches a temperature above 45 °C [85]. However, sucrose or high concentrations of salt can be introduced to lower the deposition temperature [86]. When heated, viscosity drops dramatically—typically by half for every 15 °C [87]. HPC maintains its viscosity over a wide range of pH values, from 2 to 11. However, solutions should be stored at a pH of 6–8 to prevent the loss of viscosity due to decomposition [87].

4.2. Protein Gels

Generally, proteins are the convenient biopolymers for the formation of food-based hydrogels. Moreover, plant and animal-based proteins are widely used in the fabrication of food-based hydrogels. The mecahnisms of protein-based hydrogels are illustarted in Figure 4C.

4.2.1. Gelatin

It is appropriate to begin the discussion with gelatin gel-containing food products, for which the term syneresis was coined. It has been reported that gelatin gels with a pH below or above the isoelectric point swell considerably [88]. These gels are stable at these pH levels and exhibit no syneresis, even at low protein concentrations. The osmotic pressure resulting primarily from the Donnan equilibrium is responsible for the swelling when the gel is close to its isoelectric point of 4.7; however, different results have been observed. Below a 10% concentration, the gel deswells (syneresis), whereas above this threshold, it swells. Osmotic pressure responds more quickly to changes in concentration than the network pressure, comparable to the behavior observed in a chemically crosslinked, uncharged gel. It is abundantly clear that the osmotic pressure of gelatin gel appears to perform the most significant part in the process of triggering syneresis. Increasing the polymer concentration boosts osmotic pressure, which helps to prevent syneresis. It is also possible to increase osmotic pressure by shifting the pH away from the isoelectric point, which causes the polymer charge to increase.
Figure 4. Mechanism of polysaccharide and protein gel formation. Crosslinking of chitosan (A); composite hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose-sodium alginate hydrogels (B); gelation process of chemically crosslinked protein hydrogels (C). (A,B) are reprinted with permission from He et al. [89] (Copyright © 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany) and Hu et al. [90] (Copyright © 2018 Springer Nature B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands), respectively, whereas (C) is reprinted from Hanson et al. [91] and is an open-access article (Copyright © 2020 by authors) distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. HPMC, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose; CaCl2, calcium chloride; CS, chitosan.
Figure 4. Mechanism of polysaccharide and protein gel formation. Crosslinking of chitosan (A); composite hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose-sodium alginate hydrogels (B); gelation process of chemically crosslinked protein hydrogels (C). (A,B) are reprinted with permission from He et al. [89] (Copyright © 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany) and Hu et al. [90] (Copyright © 2018 Springer Nature B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands), respectively, whereas (C) is reprinted from Hanson et al. [91] and is an open-access article (Copyright © 2020 by authors) distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. HPMC, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose; CaCl2, calcium chloride; CS, chitosan.
Gels 09 00001 g004aGels 09 00001 g004b

4.2.2. Whey Proteins

Whey proteins undergo a series of transitions that are characteristic of globular proteins before and during heat-induced gelation. These transitions include (i) the inactivation of native proteins, also known as their unfolding; (ii) the agglomeration of unfolded compounds; (iii) the formation of strands from aggregates; and (iv) the association of strands into a network. The presence of salts allows for the formation of aggregates to take place [88,92,93].

4.2.3. Egg Albumin

Egg albumin is often thought of as a system made up of many different globular proteins dissolved in water [94]. The formation of egg albumin gel occurs in three steps. First, heating causes molecules to partially unfold; this results in an increase in the number of interactions between molecules. In the second stage, sulfhydryl disulfide exchange ultimately leads to molecular aggregation, and sulfhydryl oxidation occurs both within and between the network-forming aggregates. Multiple hydrogen bonds are generated in the final step of the process, which involves cooling. The process of gel formation can be affected by a number of factors, such as the pH of the solution, the presence of salts or sugars, and the ionic strength.

4.2.4. Soy Proteins

Although acidification (for example, glucono-δ-lactone) can also induce aggregation of denatured protein molecules, gelation can be achieved by heating soybean flour [37] or milk, followed by the addition of salt (for example, Ca++ or Mg++), to form a gel or curd.

4.2.5. Milk Proteins

Owing to the high hydrophobicity of casein molecules, submicelles of casein are held together through the formation of hydrophobic bonds and salt bridges. Rennet gelation occurs as a consequence of the enzymatic hydrolysis of k-casein by rennet, which results in the release of CMP (caseinomacropeptide) and the aggregation of micelles [47,95,96].

5. Rheological Characterization of Gels

Rheological characterization is important in determining a gel’s composition, structure, and the impact of processing on that structure. In addition, by adjusting the polymer microstructure and surrounding media, a gel with the required characteristics can be created. Modern rheometers can precisely measure the reaction of a complicated material to applied stress or strain. However, understanding the gelling process and manipulating the gel’s microstructure with desired sensory properties require a basic knowledge of rheology [97]. The crosslinked polymer networks in gels are what give them their viscoelastic properties. The type and degree of crosslinking in a polymer affect its strength, which is determined by equilibrium modulus, a rheological parameter. The polymer’s mean molecular weight increases prior to the process of crosslinking, which ultimately causes the polymer to transform from a liquid (sol) into a solid (gel); this transition point is termed the gel point. There are various rheological methods for determining whether a polymer is a gel. In a creep test, the material is subjected to a constant stress, and the rate of deformation is recorded. A gel is a viscoelastic material; thus, it has two components (elastic and viscous), which produce a characteristic increase in the creep compliance (J(t) = γ(t)/σ0, where γ(t) is the time-dependent shear strain, and σ0 is the constant stress applied to the sample in the creep step). Creep-recovery compliance is a measurement of the network elasticity of gels [98]. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve a constant deformation in any gel network. Gels differ from liquids and tend to dissolve in solvents, which causes them to swell. A gel’s equilibrium modulus affects how much it swells, with harder gels swelling less than softer gels. The most accurate way to determine the critical gel point—whereby a small amount of oscillatory strain (or stress) is applied to a material to see how it reacts—is through linear oscillatory rheology. Owing to the viscoelastic properties of gels, two rheological parameters can be used to describe their viscoelasticity: viscous or loss modulus ( G cos   ( ω t ) ) and elastic or storage modulus ( G sin   ( ω t ) ). Elastic characters prevail when G′ is greater than G″, and viscous characters prevail when G′ is smaller than G″. Mechanical spectra can be expressed in terms of the complex modulus (G*) [99].
G = [ G 2 + G 2 ]
G = [ A n ω n ]
where An is the gel strength of samples, serving another characteristic parameter of the material structural type; n is the power law exponent, serving as an index of the viscoelastic nature of the material (a measure of physical crosslinks in the protein network); and ω is angular frequency [99].
The viscoelastic moduli provide a measurement of the shear-deformation resistance in terms of the elastic-deformation resistance (G′) and the viscous-deformation resistance (G″). Both moduli are the relation between shear stress (force/unit of area (Pa)) and shear strain. They frequently have a significant amount of influence due to the period of distortion. The relative importance of the elastic modulus (G′) and the viscous modulus (G″) is reflected by the phase angle, which is calculated as tanδ = G″/G′, where δ is the phase angle. The loss factor (tanδ) provides a measurement of the viscoelastic degree of gels, together with the energy cohesiveness of samples, as it is related to the lifetime of bonds, which conform the polymeric network [100]. The storage modulus (G′) surpassing the loss modulus (G″) at a particular frequency, is among the criteria that determine whether a solution will turn into a gel.

5.1. Microrheology of Gels

Despite being macroscopic parameters, the viscoelastic data of gels can provide structural information, as they are fundamental data. Therefore, fundamental tests (oscillatory tests, creep and recovery tests, dynamical thermo mechanical analysis, etc.) are essentially independent of the measurement conditions, reflecting true material properties. These material properties are related to the structural characteristics [101,102]. Recent technological advancements have made available new strategies for comprehending complicated gel structures and dynamics with different characteristic and timeframes. As a result, the concept of microrheology has been introduced, which concerns how materials store and release mechanical energy as a function of length scale. By connecting the microstructure of food systems to their macroscopic characteristics and stability, such knowledge aids food scientists in understanding the fundamental mechanisms that influence the interactions of food components [103].
Particle-tracking rheology, magnetic tweezers, diffusing-wave spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, laser particle tracking (optical tweezers), quasi-elastic light scattering and piezorheometery are just a few of the methods that can be used to characterize microrheology. Particle-tracking microrheology, also known as video particle-tracking microrheology, is one such method beginning to gain popularity. It has been used to characterize a variety of food gel systems. The local dynamics of soft material are examined in this scenario using the Brownian motion of embedded particles or tracers, without the application of an external driving force. As shown in Figure 5, there are three steps required to calculating linear viscoelasticity using particle tracking. Following tracking of particle trajectories and calculation of the mean-square displacement (MSD) as a function of the lag time of these fluctuations (due to Brownian motion), the data are translated into viscoelastic properties, specifically storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli and creep compliance (J) [104]. With the least possible disruption to the developing gel structure, it can also identify the gel point.
The time-averaged mean-squared displacement in the picture plane (x, y) ({ r 2 ( τ ) } ) is expressed in Equation (3):
{ r 2 ( τ ) = [ x + ( t + τ ) x ( t ) ] 2 + [ y + ( t + τ ) y ( t ) ] 2 }
The calculated r 2 ( τ ) corresponds to:
r 2 ( τ ) = 2 d D τ = 2 d ( k B T 6 π η a ) τ for viscous medium
r 2 ( τ ) = d k B T / 3 π a G for an elastic medium
where D is the diffusion coefficient calculated according to the Stokes–Einstein Equation (4).
D = ( k B T 6 π η a )
where kB is the Boltzmann constant. The calculated r 2 ( τ ) is converted into elastic and viscous moduli. Additionally, the estimated r 2 ( τ ) can be connected to another significant viscoelastic parameter, i.e., creep compliance ( J ( t ) ), which is expressed as the time-dependent strain that results from stress values within the linear viscoelastic range (LVER) [98].

5.2. Oral Processing and Texture Perception of Gels

Oral processing refers to the manipulation of food in the mouth, which produces signals transmitted to the brain and result in an impression of texture and mouth feel [11]. Several technical characteristics, such as cutting, elasticity, firmness, effort, extensibility, melting, and the adhesiveness rate in the mouth, provide a more nuanced explanation of a food’s texture. Texture is not just how food feels in the mouth, such as smooth or rough, light or heavy, etc. Given that gels are colloidal dispersions, which are typically thick, sticky, and solid-like materials, and thus, G′ > G″ → tanδ < 1 (elastic nature), as supported by the continuous phase (solid matrix), consumers may have trouble swallowing them, particularly the elderly and those who have dysphagia. Mastication (the act of chewing food) requires a variety of muscles, including the masseter muscles.
Suprahyoid muscles play a role in the movement of the tongue against the hard palate and the first movement of food during oropharyngeal swallowing. When eating soft foods such as jellies, suprahyoid muscles are more active than masseters; in contrast, eating firm, viscous, and sticky foods or gels causes more masseter activity than suprahyoid activity [105]. Electromyography (EMG), a method for evaluating the participation of masticatory muscles needed for chewing and swallowing various types of food, can be used to measure the activity of these muscles. EMG investigations are therefore helpful in research on food texture [106]. In one study, five different kinds of hydrocolloid gels were chosen, and EMG tests were run utilizing a variety of variables, such as the number of chews, the length of each chew, the quantity of masseter or suprahyoid action, the length of each masseter or suprahyoid action, etc. The findings indicate that chewing requires less effort with gels that melted more readily in the mouth than with hard and slick gels [107]. The fact that all types of gels exhibit strong masseter activity and have high EMG variable values can be explained by the fact that gels are always chewed thoroughly before ingesting.

6. Network Structure and Strength

6.1. Interconnected Polymeric Networks

Generally, the mechanical strength of typical food gels is sufficient for three-dimensional printing and edible film production. However, the networking of gels should be improved for encapsulation application [108]. In this regard, loading capacity is also limited for successful encapsulation of bioactive substances. Owing to the limitations of ordinary hydrogels, interpenetrating network hydrogels with superior mechanical characteristics have been developed. Interpenetrating network hydrogels are polymers composed of at least two networks that are partially intertwined on a molecular scale but not covalently bound to one another. Edible interpenetrating hydrogels are often made with natural polysaccharides and proteins, which are biodegradable and biocompatible. Several methods for producing interpenetrating hydrogels have been devised, including ionic [109], enzymatic [110], and heating and cooling [111] processes. Previously, various researchers developed hydrogels for application in food compositions to improve mechanical characteristics [112,113].

6.2. Strengthening Polymeric Networks

Enhancing the adhesion between distinct gel networks can boost the mechanical strength of hydrogels [114]. In previous research, two primary mechanisms have been implicated in an increase in the strengthening mechanism: polysaccharides incorporated as fillers of the network developed by other biopolymers, such as polysaccharide–protein hydrogels, e.g., k-carrageenan/sodium alginate double networks [115]; a myofibrillar protein embedded with native starch, such as (tapioca or potato starch) [116]; tilapia myofibrillar protein embedded with konjac glucomannan [117]; and myofibrillar protein imbedded in cassava starch [111]. Polysaccharides incorporated in proteins produce a hydrogel with an improved textural profile, possibly as a result of the “filling effect” or “packing effect”. Starch particles compactly linked to proteins in these hydrogels exert a “packing effect” by expanding the starch granules and increasing the ensuing internal pressure. As a result, enhanced strengthening of textural and mechanical qualities is observed [118]. Furthermore, other polysaccharides, such carrageenan and konjac glucomannan, primarily operate as fillers to improve the gelling properties of protein gels after hydration, a phenomenon known as the “filling effect”. These polysaccharides, when employed as fillers, can improve the mechanical properties of hydrogels by forming a dense and continuous gel network, enhancing the hydrogels’ adhesiveness, hardness, and chewiness [119]. Polysaccharides are subsequently interwoven with other biopolymers to improve the density of entangled networks, which are commonly found in polysaccharide–polysaccharide hydrogels [120]. In one investigation, hydrogels made of konjac glucomannan and flaxseed gum were made by heating and cooling the mixture. As the mixture cooled, hydrogen bonds formed between the flaxseed and konjac glucomannan molecules. Hydrogen bonds created strong interactions between molecules that worked together to make the hydrogel hard, springy, and chewy [49].

7. Application of Hydrogel-Based Formulations in the Food Industry

7.1. Fat Replacers

An increase in the consumption of high-fat foods is linked to an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, obesity, and diabetes. As a result, it is essential to develop food products that contain less fat, such as mayonnaise and ice cream. On the other hand, reducing the amount of fat in foods can result in unfavorable changes in the finished product, such as reduced water retention, altered flavor, and a more rigid consistency. For instance, when fat is removed from cakes, the crumb mixture becomes firm and dry. In addition, the functional qualities of salad dressings may suffer as a result of reduced fat content [30]. Owing to their high capacity to hold water, hydrogels made from protein and polysaccharides have proven to useful in maintaining lubricity and texture in a manner comparable to that of full-fat products [119].
While using hydrogels to replace fat, it is preferable to have hydrogels with excellent viscoelasticity and rheological properties. Therefore, various hybrid hydrogels were developed for desirable characteristics, such as pectin and whey protein [119]. Researchers produced mayonnaises with pectin and whey protein hydrogel by replacing 20% of the fat contents. Furthermore, the addition of fat replacers at sixty percent concentration can improve the stability of mayonnaise by reducing the level of flocculation and coalescence of fat droplets [121]. In addition, a number of different biopolymers, such as starch, have been reported for use as fat replacers [122].

7.2. Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds: Gel-Based Formulations

The addition of odor or bioactive compounds to a food formulation can improve its sensory, nutrient, and antibacterial properties [123]. Hydrogels are becoming increasingly popular as encapsulating agents, owing to their superior encapsulation efficiency, biocompatibility, low price, and ecofriendly characteristics [124]. Curcumin was encapsulated in hydrogels, with a 90.3% success rate [125]. CMC-K-car, like CMC gel, can encapsulate probiotic bacteria, but it does so at a much higher rate (94.7%) than CMC gel (74.7%). Therefore, it can be used to ensure the most effective release of bioactive substances [126]. The amount of curcumin released from LRA-CS (70%) was also reported to be lower than that from water (91%) in an in vitro small intestine model study [125]. To effectively administer lysozyme, a chitosan/sodium alginate hydrogel was developed in a recent study [124]. The relative activity of lysozyme was measured at 87.72%, but the rate at which bacteria were eliminated was as high as 100%. Figure 6 depicts the variety of hydrogel systems and the efficiencies with which they can encapsulate bioactive compounds. In another study, hydrogen was made with food-grade pectin and PEG (polyethylene glycol)-encapsulated Ca, vitamin D, Fe2+, and vitamin C. The gels were used to shield nutrients from artificial stomach acid [127]. Table 3 presents different types of hydrogel-based systems used for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds.
Bioactive substances provide specific health advantages to humans [134]. However, environmental stressors such as oxygen, temperature, and light can destroy these important molecules. In addition to external stress, the gastrointestinal tract imposes stressful conditions related to enzymes, pH, and other antinutrients in the meal [135,136]. Owing to the presence of dietary fiber, microcapsules have a high potential for target release [137]. As an oral delivery system, corn fiber gum-soy protein isolate hydrogel effectively encapsulates riboflavin. Adding corn fiber gum to pure soy protein isolate hydrogel was reported to enhance the riboflavin release efficiency in the gut [138]. In addition, the drug-carrying capacity alginate can be improved by enhancing its mechanical characteristics and durability [139]. Some researchers studied whether the microcrystalline and microfiber forms of cellulose contained in alginate beads may successfully enhance the mechanical characteristics and drug release of alginate beads in simulated intestinal fluid [140,141].
β-carotene is a bioactive molecule and vitamin A precursor with powerful antioxidant properties [142]. However, owing to its hydrophobic nature, direct application of β-carotene in food products is restricted. In addition, it is chemically unstable under environmental stresses such as oxygen, temperature, and light [143]. However, previous research has demonstrated that emulsion-filled hydrogels are a suitable vehicle for the targeted delivery of β-carotene [144]. In addition to emulsion-filled hydrogels that incorporate useful chemicals (such as beta-carotene) into the lipid phase, hydrogels can release entrapped oil into the intestinal environment by integrating certain biopolymers [144,145].

7.3. Delivery System

Hydrogels are often used in targeted delivery because they can absorb and store a large amount of water or biological fluids in a 3D network structure [146]. Nanoemulsions or Pickering emulsions have also been enclosed in hydrogel beads using Trojan horse nanoparticles [147]. Other hydrogel characteristics including stimulus reactivity to pH, heat, and light are especially helpful for regulated release in food nutrition delivery methods [148].
It should be noted that many studies have been conducted using hydrogels to create smart drug delivery systems, such as microgels. The majority of the time, hydrogels for controlled release medication administration is created based on the swelling or shrinkage caused by pH and temperature signals [149]. There are parallels between the food supply chain and the pharmaceutical supply chain, but there are also some distinctions between them [149]. Therefore, previous studies of the implementation of structured hydrogels with well-designed drug delivery systems serve as instructive examples [149].

7.4. Calorie Control

Reduced-fat or reduced-starch goods must be created immediately. By increasing satiety or decreasing consumption, hydrogels can also support weight loss and calorie restriction. Hydrogel particles made of protein and dietary fiber have a pleasant texture and can serve as a healthier alternative to starch granules [150]. The caloric density of pancakes that were cooked at temperatures significantly higher than the boiling point of water was reported to be reduced using a temperature-insensitive, food-grade, mixed agar–methylcellulose hydrogel [151]. Furthermore, vegetable oils can be used in place of animal oils to create emulsion hydrogels for use in low-fat meals.

7.5. Food Texture Perception

In the food engineering and processing field, one of the most important elements affecting food product quality is the impression of food texture [152]. Hydrogels are soft substances with important textural qualities, such as elasticity, hardness, chewiness, fracture, etc. [153]. Therefore, hydrogels can be utilized to enhance the mouth feel and texture of food, supporting low-calorie consumption [154]. For instance, emulsion hydrogels can affect the texture of food. It is interesting to note a reduction in the amount of calories in food can also be accomplished by replacing meat or grain with hydrogels with excellent textural properties or containing little oil [155].

7.6. Risk Monitoring

Hydrogels have attracted considerable interest in the food industry, as they can be used as a biosensor or signal probe to identify danger or risk elements in food. For instance, a fluorescent DNA hydrogel aptasensor was developed for sensitive ochratoxin A detection. A portable pH meter with an aptamer-responsive, crosslinked hydrogel was also proposed to detect aflatoxin B-1. In a related study, researchers produced a 2D molecularly imprinted photonic crystal hydrogel sensor for detection of oxytetracycline in milk [156]. In recent decades, polymer-based hydrogels and solid-phase extraction have been used as a sampling technique for direct onsite rapid detection of dangerous chemicals such as rhodamine B, mercury (II), and (Hg2+) ions [157].

7.7. Food Packaging Materials

The widespread use and abuse of high-molecular-weight, petroleum-based polymeric materials is a severe problem that must be addressed, and packaging food using hydrogel is a significant step in that direction [158]. Biobased biodegradable materials have been promoted for food packaging by recent research and scientific advancements [159]. The primary function of these components in food packaging is to regulate the humidity inside the container. Hydrogels can be used to reduce water activity (aw), preventing the growth of mold, microbes, and pathogens that cause spoilage of packaged foods and hygroscopic products. Hydrogel can also protect dry, crunchy items from becoming softer [160,161]. Mechanical characteristics, high absorption, water-absorbing properties, and even breathability and accountability are key properties to be concerned about from the standpoint of the formation of hydrogels. Moreover, traditional considerations such as minimal price, recyclability, and biocompatibility are essential features. Whether the hydrogels function as conventional, active, or smart packaging materials, the hydrogel structure is the most important factor to consider [162].
The headspace or the contained food product can interact directly with active packaging to prevent or inhibit microbial development, retaining the food’s nutritional value or enhancing its flavor over time [163]. Therefore, hydrogels have been thoroughly researched in food matrices and in vitro in combination with various antimicrobial chemicals, for example, silver or bioactive compounds [164]. Therefore, by integrating nanoparticles into the polymeric structure of a hydrogel, hybrid hydrogels such as nanocomposite hydrogels can represent a feasible solution to limitations such as the limited resistance to mechanical and hydrostatic stress of standard hydrogels [165]. Hydrogels also demonstrate their potential for use in intelligent packaging systems, whereby they can be used to alert consumers about the state of freshness of the food goods they contain or as a component of a quick test to identify pollutants [166]. The structured design of hydrogels is mostly used in this application area to support their smart response capabilities in the food engineering and processing field.

8. Conclusions and Future Directions

Gels are viscoelastic substances, and the commercial viability of food gels is of extreme significance. To develop gelled products, it is necessary to comprehend sol-gel transformation. One of the most crucial factors for consumers is the gel’s texture, which can be affected by a wide range of factors, such as the material’s makeup, composition, duration, temperature, pH, etc. The most recent developments in producing food-grade hydrogels for applications involving food were analyzed and discussed in detail in this study. In addition, aspects of hydrogels derived from natural sources were investigated; nevertheless, the gel strength of these substances could be improved by the addition of polysaccharides and proteins. Furthermore, hydrogels are a good source of energy, and when bioactive components are added, they act as a protective carrier for these substances. Owing to these attractive features, they are used in a wide range of food application areas, including for the production of bioactive substances, the protection of different flavors, and the replacement of fat in a wide range of products. In addition, consumers have demonstrated a high level of sensory acceptance for these hydrogel systems as fat replacers, sweetener replacers, etc., offering quality ingredients for a healthier lifestyle. Hydrogels can also be used in other contexts, such as for tissue regeneration, medical technology, and the precise administration of drugs.
Hydrogels have a wide range of uses in food processing, owing to their superior functional characteristics, consistency, mechanical strength, and water permeability. Nonetheless, it is still essential to pay attention to certain aspects of hydrogels. For example, it remains unknown how networks of hydrogels are interconnected. However, it is impossible to exert any control over the interaction of hydrogels. No accessible in-depth research has been conducted in this field to date. Regulation of the interplay between various gels can improve the absorption ability of hydrogels and cause less damage to the surrounding environment. As a result, further research and studies on this aspect of hydrogels are required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C.N., P.K.N. and M.S.; methodology, P.C.N. and S.D.; software, K.S. and B.S.I.; validation, P.K.N. and M.S.; formal analysis, P.C.N. and S.D.; investigation, P.C.N. and S.D.; resources, M.S., P.K.N., B.S.I. and K.S.; data curation, P.C.N. and S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.C.N., K.S. and S.D.; writing—review and editing, M.S., B.S.I., P.K.N. and K.S.; visualization, M.S., B.S.I., P.K.N. and K.S.; supervision, P.K.N. and M.S.; project administration, P.K.N.; funding acquisition, P.K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaur, R.; Kukkar, D.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Kim, K.-H.; Deep, A. Potential use of polymers and their complexes as media for storage and delivery of fragrances. J. Control. Release 2018, 285, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Blinov, A.V.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Nagdalian, A.A.; Blinova, A.A.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Raffa, V.V.; Oboturova, N.P.; Golik, A.B.; Maglakelidze, D.G.; Ibrahim, S.A. Investigation of the influence of Zinc-containing compounds on the components of the colloidal phase of milk. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Enzyme mimicry for combating bacteria and biofilms. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hussain, I.; Singh, N.; Singh, A.; Singh, H.; Singh, S. Green synthesis of nanoparticles and its potential application. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zaidi, K.U.; Ali, A.S.; Ali, S.A.; Naaz, I. Microbial tyrosinases: Promising enzymes for pharmaceutical, food bioprocessing, and environmental industry. Biochem. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 854687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fan, Z.; Cheng, P.; Gao, Y.; Wang, D.; Jia, G.; Zhang, P.; Prakash, S.; Wang, Z.; Han, J. Understanding the rheological properties of a novel composite salecan/gellan hydrogels. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. Recent advances in edible polymer based hydrogels as a sustainable alternative to conventional polymers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6940–6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nazir, A.; Asghar, A.; Maan, A.A. Food gels: Gelling process and new applications. In Advances in Food Rheology and Its Applications; Ahmed, J., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 335–353. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bashir, S.; Hina, M.; Iqbal, J.; Rajpar, A.; Mujtaba, M.; Alghamdi, N.; Wageh, S.; Ramesh, K.; Ramesh, S. Fundamental concepts of hydrogels: Synthesis, properties, and their applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sala, G.; Stieger, M.; van de Velde, F. Serum release boosts sweetness intensity in gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2010, 24, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stieger, M.; van de Velde, F. Microstructure, texture and oral processing: New ways to reduce sugar and salt in foods. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 18, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reque, P.M.; Brandelli, A. Encapsulation of probiotics and nutraceuticals: Applications in functional food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boostani, S.; Jafari, S.M. A comprehensive review on the controlled release of encapsulated food ingredients; fundamental concepts to design and applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 303–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguyen, M.N.; Tran, P.H.; Tran, T.T. A single-layer film coating for colon-targeted oral delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 559, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Munir, N.; Hasnain, M.; Waqif, H.; Adetuyi, B.O.; Egbuna, C.; Olisah, M.C.; Chikwendu, C.J.; Uche, C.Z.; C Patrick-Iwuanyanwu, K.; El Sayed, A.M.A. Gelling agents, micro and nanogels in food system applications. In Application of Nanotechnology in Food Science, Processing and Packaging; Egbuna, C., Jeevanandam, J., Patrick-Iwuanyanwu, K.C., Onyeike, E.N., Eds.; Springer: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 153–167. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhu, P.; Huang, W.; Chen, L. Develop and characterize thermally reversible transparent gels from pea protein isolate and study the gel formation mechanisms. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Catauro, M.; Ciprioti, S.V. Characterization of hybrid materials prepared by sol-gel method for biomedical implementations. A critical review. Materials 2021, 14, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Totosaus, A.; Montejano, J.G.; Salazar, J.A.; Guerrero, I. A review of physical and chemical protein-gel induction. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 37, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. dos Santos Carvalho, J.D.; Rabelo, R.S.; Hubinger, M.D. Thermo-rheological properties of chitosan hydrogels with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and methylcellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kornet, R.; Sridharan, S.; Venema, P.; Sagis, L.M.; Nikiforidis, C.V.; van der Goot, A.J.; Meinders, M.B.; van der Linden, E. Fractionation methods affect the gelling properties of pea proteins in emulsion-filled gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Y.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Y.; Phuhongsung, P. Improving 3D/4D printing characteristics of natural food gels by novel additives: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dickinson, E. Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocoll. 2003, 17, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gousse, C.; Chanzy, H.; Cerrada, M.; Fleury, E. Surface silylation of cellulose microfibrils: Preparation and rheological properties. Polymer 2004, 45, 1569–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saha, D.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: A critical review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, X.; Li, A.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. An overview of classifications, properties of food polysaccharides and their links to applications in improving food textures. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 587–597. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mudgil, D.; Barak, S.; Khatkar, B.S. Guar gum: Processing, properties and food applications—A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bashir, A.; Sharma, P.K.; Warsi, M.H. Extraction and characterization of xyloglucan (tamarind seed polysaccharide) as pharmaceutical excipient. WJPPS 2016, 6, 2209–2220. [Google Scholar]
  28. Torres, M.D.; Flórez-Fernández, N.; Dominguez, H. Ultrasound-assisted water extraction of mastocarpus stellatus carrageenan with adequate mechanical and antiproliferative properties. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barak, S.; Mudgil, D. Locust bean gum: Processing, properties and food applications—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 66, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, R.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhang, M. Fabricating soy protein hydrolysate/xanthan gum as fat replacer in ice cream by combined enzymatic and heat-shearing treatment. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 81, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singhvi, G.; Hans, N.; Shiva, N.; Dubey, S.K. Xanthan gum in drug delivery applications. In Natural Polysaccharides in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; Hasnain, M.S., Nayak, A.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 121–144. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jindal, N.; Khattar, J.S. Microbial polysaccharides in food industry. In Biopolymers for Food Design; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 95–123. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, H.W.; Karim, M.R.; Ji, H.M.; Choi, J.H.; Ghim, H.D.; Park, S.M.; Oh, W.; Yeum, J.H. Electrospinning fabrication and characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol)/montmorillonite nanofiber mats. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 1860–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roopa, B.; Bhattacharya, S. Alginate gels: I. Characterization of textural attributes. J. Food Eng. 2008, 85, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Y.; Ye, H.; Zhao, C.; Ren, L.; Wang, C.; Georgiev, M.I.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, T. Value added immunoregulatory polysaccharides of Hericium erinaceus and their effect on the gut microbiota. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 262, 117668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gunasekaran, S.; Xiao, L.; Ould Eleya, M. Whey protein concentrate hydrogels as bioactive carriers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99, 2470–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bhattacharya, S.; Jena, R. Gelling behavior of defatted soybean flour dispersions due to microwave treatment: Textural, oscillatory, microstructural and sensory properties. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kleemann, C.; Selmer, I.; Smirnova, I.; Kulozik, U. Tailor made protein based aerogel particles from egg white protein, whey protein isolate and sodium caseinate: Influence of the preceding hydrogel characteristics. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 83, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shahidi, F.; Synowiecki, J. Isolation and characterization of nutrients and value-added products from snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) and shrimp (Pandalus borealis) processing discards. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ponsubha, S.; Jaiswal, A.K. Effect of interpolymer complex formation between chondroitin sulfate and chitosan-gelatin hydrogel on physico-chemical and rheological properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116179. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dissanayake, M.; Vasiljevic, T. Functional properties of whey proteins affected by heat treatment and hydrodynamic high-pressure shearing. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 1387–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lucey, J.; Singh, H. Formation and physical properties of acid milk gels: A review. Food Res. Int. 1997, 30, 529–542. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bryant, C.; McClements, D. Molecular basis of cold-setting whey protein ingredients. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 9, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  44. Alting, A.C.; de Jongh, H.H.; Visschers, R.W.; Simons, J.-W.F. Physical and chemical interactions in cold gelation of food proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4682–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aguilera, J.M.; Kessler, H.G. Properties of mixed and filled-type dairy gels. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54, 1213–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heinen, L.; Heuser, T.; Steinschulte, A.; Walther, A. Antagonistic enzymes in a biocatalytic pH feedback system program autonomous DNA hydrogel life cycles. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 4989–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Banerjee, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Food gels: Gelling process and new applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gharibzahedi, S.M.T.; Chronakis, I.S. Crosslinking of milk proteins by microbial transglutaminase: Utilization in functional yogurt products. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jiang, Y.; Reddy, C.K.; Huang, K.; Chen, L.; Xu, B. Hydrocolloidal properties of flaxseed gum/konjac glucomannan compound gel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Burey, P.; Bhandari, B.; Howes, T.; Gidley, M. Hydrocolloid gel particles: Formation, characterization, and application. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 48, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Richter, S. Recent gelation studies on irreversible and reversible systems with dynamic light scattering and rheology—A concise summary. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2007, 208, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmad, N.H.; Mustafa, S.; Che Man, Y.B. Microbial polysaccharides and their modification approaches: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Vilgis, T.A. Gels: Model systems for soft matter food physics. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 3, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nishinari, K.; Zhang, H. Recent advances in the understanding of heat set gelling polysaccharides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McClements, D.J. Non-covalent interactions between proteins and polysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Williams, P.A.; Phillips, G.O. Introduction to food hydrocolloids. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids, 3rd ed.; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lapomarda, A.; Pulidori, E.; Cerqueni, G.; Chiesa, I.; De Blasi, M.; Geven, M.A.; Montemurro, F.; Duce, C.; Mattioli-Belmonte, M.; Tiné, M.R. Pectin as rheology modifier of a gelatin-based biomaterial ink. Materials 2021, 14, 3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chan, S.Y.; Choo, W.S.; Young, D.J.; Loh, X.J. Pectin as a rheology modifier: Origin, structure, commercial production and rheology. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 161, 118–139. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chan, S.Y.; Owh, C.; Choo, W.S.; Young, D.J.; Loh, X.J.; Li, P.; Huang, W. Pectin as a rheology modifier: Chemistry, production, and rheology. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2006, 24, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sutherland, I.W. Biotechnology of microbial polysaccharides in food. In FoodBiotechnology, 1st ed.; Pometto, A., Shetty, K., Paliyath, G., Levin, R.E., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 220–247. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mizrahi, S. Syneresis in food gels and its implications for food quality. In Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Food and Beverages; Skibsted, L.H., Risbo, J., Andersen, M.L., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2010; pp. 324–348. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gallant, D.; Bouchet, B.; Buleon, A.; Perez, S. Physical characteristics of starch granules and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992, 46, S3–S16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Q.; Rademacher, B.; Sedlmeyer, F.; Kulozik, U. Gelation behaviour of aqueous solutions of different types of carrageenan investigated by low-intensity-ultrasound measurements and comparison to rheological measurements. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2005, 6, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Morris, E.R.; Rees, D.A.; Robinson, G. Cation-specific aggregation of carrageenan helices: Domain model of polymer gel structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1980, 138, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Viebke, C.; Piculell, L.; Nilsson, S. On the mechanism of gelation of helix-forming biopolymers. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 4160–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Babbar, S.; Jain, R.; Walia, N. Guar gum as a gelling agent for plant tissue culture media. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2005, 41, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jain, R.; Babbar, S.B. Guar gum and isubgol as cost-effective alternative gelling agents for in vitro multiplication of an orchid, Dendrobium chrysotoxum. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88, 292–295. [Google Scholar]
  68. Astrini, N.; Anah, L.; Haryono, A. Crosslinking parameter on the preparation of cellulose based hydrogel with divynilsulfone. Procedia Chem. 2012, 4, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ibrahim, M.M.; Abd-Eladl, M.; Abou-Baker, N.H. Lignocellulosic biomass for the preparation of cellulose-based hydrogel and its use for optimizing water resources in agriculture. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Motamedi, E.; Sadeghian Motahar, S.F.; Maleki, M.; Kavousi, K.; Ariaeenejad, S.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A.; Hosseini Salekdeh, G. Upgrading the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by immobilization of metagenome-derived novel halotolerant cellulase on the carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel. Cellulose 2021, 28, 3485–3503. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kanikireddy, V.; Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Karthikeyan, C.; Sadiku, R. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for infection control and wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Mali, K.; Dhawale, S.; Dias, R.; Dhane, N.; Ghorpade, V. Citric acid crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose-based composite hydrogel films for drug delivery. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 80, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Baiya, C.; Nannuan, L.; Tassanapukdee, Y.; Chailapakul, O.; Songsrirote, K. The synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel from sugarcane bagasse using microwave-assisted irradiation for selective adsorption of copper (II) ions. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, S157–S165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Turky, G.; Moussa, M.A.; Hasanin, M.; El-Sayed, N.S.; Kamel, S. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel: Dielectric study, antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mallakpour, S.; Tukhani, M.; Hussain, C.M. Recent advancements in 3D bioprinting technology of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogels: Utilization in tissue engineering. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 292, 102415. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sethi, S.; Kaith, B.; Kumar, V. Fabrication and characterization of microwave assisted carboxymethyl cellulose-gelatin silver nanoparticles imbibed hydrogel: Its evaluation as dye degradation. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 142, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sharmeen, S.; Rahman, M.S.; Islam, M.M.; Islam, M.S.; Shahruzzaman, M.; Mallik, A.K.; Haque, P.; Rahman, M.M. Application of polysaccharides in enzyme immobilization. In Functional Polysaccharides for Biomedical Applications; Maiti, S., Jana, S., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 357–395. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kukrety, A.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, P.; Ray, S.S. Comprehension on the synthesis of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) utilizing various cellulose rich waste biomass resources. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 1587–1595. [Google Scholar]
  79. Koh, M.H. Preparation and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Cellulose from Sugarcane Bagasse. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 2013. Available online: http://eprints.utar.edu.my/895/1/CE-2013-1004861.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  80. Haqiqi, M.T.; Bankeeree, W.; Lotrakul, P.; Pattananuwat, P.; Punnapayak, H.; Ramadhan, R.; Kobayashi, T.; Amirta, R.; Prasongsuk, S. Antioxidant and UV-blocking properties of a carboxymethyl cellulose–lignin composite film produced from oil palm empty fruit bunch. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 9653–9666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Nasution, H.; Harahap, H.; Dalimunthe, N.F.; Ginting, M.H.S.; Jaafar, M.; Tan, O.O.; Aruan, H.K.; Herfananda, A.L. Hydrogel and effects of crosslinking agent on cellulose-based hydrogels: A review. Gels 2022, 8, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Gårdebjer, S.; Larsson, M.; Gebäck, T.; Skepö, M.; Larsson, A. An overview of the transport of liquid molecules through structured polymer films, barriers and composites–Experiments correlated to structure-based simulations. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 256, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Boyer, C.; Figueiredo, L.; Pace, R.; Lesoeur, J.; Rouillon, T.; Le Visage, C.; Tassin, J.-F.; Weiss, P.; Guicheux, J.; Rethore, G. Laponite nanoparticle-associated silated hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose as an injectable reinforced interpenetrating network hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018, 65, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bacakova, L.; Pajorova, J.; Bacakova, M.; Skogberg, A.; Kallio, P.; Kolarova, K.; Svorcik, V. Nanocellulose in biotechnology and medicine: Focus on skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Nanomateirals 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Perinelli, D.R.; Palmieri, G.F.; Cespi, M.; Bonacucina, G. Encapsulation of flavours and fragrances into polymeric capsules and cyclodextrins inclusion complexes: An update. Molecules 2020, 25, 5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wach, R.A.; Mitomo, H.; Yoshii, F.; Kume, T. Hydrogel of radiation-induced cross-linked hydroxypropylcellulose. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2002, 287, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lu, C.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Yong, Q.; Chu, F. Ultra-strong hydroxypropyl cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol composite hydrogel by combination of triple-network and mechanical training. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Van den Berg, L.; Rosenberg, Y.; Van Boekel, M.A.; Rosenberg, M.; Van de Velde, F. Microstructural features of composite whey protein/polysaccharide gels characterized at different length scales. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1288–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. He, H.; Cao, X.; Dong, H.; Ma, T.; Payne, G.F. Reversible programing of soft matter with reconfigurable mechanical properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Han, D.; Ding, Z.; Zeng, S.; Xiao, X. Construction and evaluation of the hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose-sodium alginate composite hydrogel system for sustained drug release. J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hanson, B.S.; Brown, C.P.; Laurent, H.; Hughes, M.D.G.; Dougan, L. Hierarchical biomechanics: Student engagement activities with a focus on biological physics. Phys. Educ. 2020, 55, 025015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. De Jong, S.; Klok, H.J.; Van de Velde, F. The mechanism behind microstructure formation in mixed whey protein–polysaccharide cold-set gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Laneuville, S.I.; Turgeon, S.L. Microstructure and stability of skim milk acid gels containing an anionic bacterial exopolysaccharide and commercial polysaccharides. Int. Dairy J. 2014, 37, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Godiya, C.B.; Kumar, S.; Xiao, Y. Amine functionalized egg albumin hydrogel with enhanced adsorption potential for diclofenac sodium in water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fertsch, B.; Müller, M.; Hinrichs, J. Firmness of pressure-induced casein and whey protein gels modulated by holding time and rate of pressure release. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2003, 4, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Keogh, M.K.; Lainé, K.I.; O’connor, J.F. Rheology of sodium caseinate-carrageenan mixtures. J. Texture Stud. 1996, 26, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Foegeding, E.A. Rheology and sensory texture of biopolymer gels. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 12, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Herranz, B.; Tovar, C.A.; Solo-de-Zaldívar, B.; Borderias, A.J. Effect of alkalis on konjac glucomannan gels for use as potential gelling agents in restructured seafood products. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 27, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Campo-Deaño, L.; Tovar, C. The effect of egg albumen on the viscoelasticity of crab sticks made from Alaska Pollock and Pacific Whiting surimi. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1641–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Moreno, H.M.; Dominguez-Timon, F.; Díaz, M.T.; Pedrosa, M.M.; Borderías, A.J.; Tovar, C.A. Evaluation of gels made with different commercial pea protein isolate: Rheological, structural and functional properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 99, 105375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Borderías, A.J.; Tovar, C.A.; Domínguez-Timón, F.; Díaz, M.T.; Pedrosa, M.M.; Moreno, H.M. Characterization of healthier mixed surimi gels obtained through partial substitution of myofibrillar proteins by pea protein isolates. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 107, 105976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Barnes, H.A.; Hutton, J.F.; Walter, K. An Introduction to Rheology, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 1–201. [Google Scholar]
  103. Moschakis, T. Microrheology and particle tracking in food gels and emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 18, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Grimm, M.; Jeney, S.; Franosch, T. Brownian motion in a Maxwell fluid. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2076–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Ishihara, S.; Nakauma, M.; Funami, T.; Tanaka, T.; Nishinari, K.; Kohyama, K. Electromyography during oral processing in relation to mechanical and sensory properties of soft gels. J. Texture Stud. 2011, 42, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kohyama, K.; Mioche, L.; Bourdio3, P. Influence of age and dental status on chewing behaviour studied by EMG recordings during consumption of various food samples. Gerodontology 2003, 20, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pascua, Y.; Koç, H.; Foegeding, E.A. Food structure: Roles of mechanical properties and oral processing in determining sensory texture of soft materials. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 18, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. De Silva, D.A. Characterization of Single Network and Interpenetrating Network Hydrogels of Natural and Synthetic Polymers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, 2013. Available online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4042 (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  109. Liu, K.; Li, Q.-M.; Zha, X.-Q.; Pan, L.-H.; Bao, L.-J.; Zhang, H.-L.; Luo, J.-P. Effects of calcium or sodium ions on the properties of whey protein isolate-lotus root amylopectin composite gel. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sorde, K.L.; Ananthanarayan, L. Effect of transglutaminase treatment on properties of coconut protein-guar gum composite film. LWT 2019, 115, 108422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fan, M.; Hu, T.; Zhao, S.; Xiong, S.; Xie, J.; Huang, Q. Gel characteristics and microstructure of fish myofibrillar protein/cassava starch composites. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yadav, M.; Chiu, F.-C. Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced κ-carrageenan based UV resistant transparent bionanocomposite films for sustainable packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 211, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kim, M.H.; Lee, Y.W.; Jung, W.-K.; Oh, J.; Nam, S.Y. Enhanced rheological behaviors of alginate hydrogels with carrageenan for extrusion-based bioprinting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 98, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Graham, S.; Marina, P.F.; Blencowe, A. Thermoresponsive polysaccharides and their thermoreversible physical hydrogel networks. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, L.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.; Yu, F.; Ma, J. Ionically cross-linked sodium alginate/ĸ-carrageenan double-network gel beads with low-swelling, enhanced mechanical properties, and excellent adsorption performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wu, T.; Huang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Ye, X.; Liu, D.; Chen, J. Formation of hydrogels based on chitosan/alginate for the delivery of lysozyme and their antibacterial activity. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Jian, W.; Wu, H.; Wu, L.; Wu, Y.; Jia, L.; Pang, J.; Sun, Y.-m. Effect of molecular characteristics of Konjac glucomannan on gelling and rheological properties of Tilapia myofibrillar protein. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mi, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Yi, S.; Li, X.; Li, J. The interaction of starch-gums and their effect on gel properties and protein conformation of silver carp surimi. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, X.; Gong, T.; Lu, Y.-h.; Li, A.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. Compatibility of sodium alginate and konjac glucomannan and their applications in fabricating low-fat mayonnaise-like emulsion gels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zheng, J.; Zeng, R.; Zhang, F.; Kan, J. Effects of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose on rheological properties and gelation behaviors of sodium alginate induced by calcium ions. LWT 2019, 103, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, C.; Liu, R.; Liang, B.; Wu, T.; Sui, W.; Zhang, M. Microparticulated whey protein-pectin complex: A texture-controllable gel for low-fat mayonnaise. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Diamantino, V.R.; Costa, M.S.; Taboga, S.R.; Vilamaior, P.S.; Franco, C.M.; Penna, A.L.B. Starch as a potential fat replacer for application in cheese: Behaviour of different starches in casein/starch mixtures and in the casein matrix. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 89, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abaee, A.; Mohammadian, M.; Jafari, S.M. Whey and soy protein-based hydrogels and nano-hydrogels as bioactive delivery systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 70, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wu, M.; Wang, J.; Ge, Q.; Yu, H.; Xiong, Y.L. Rheology and microstructure of myofibrillar protein–starch composite gels: Comparison of native and modified starches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Liu, K.; Zha, X.-Q.; Shen, W.-D.; Li, Q.-M.; Pan, L.-H.; Luo, J.-P. The hydrogel of whey protein isolate coated by lotus root amylopectin enhance the stability and bioavailability of quercetin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dafe, A.; Etemadi, H.; Zarredar, H.; Mahdavinia, G.R. Development of novel carboxymethyl cellulose/k-carrageenan blends as an enteric delivery vehicle for probiotic bacteria. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 97, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gautam, M.; Santhiya, D. Pectin/PEG food grade hydrogel blend for the targeted oral co-delivery of nutrients. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 577, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. McClements, D.J. Designing biopolymer microgels to encapsulate, protect and deliver bioactive components: Physicochemical aspects. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 240, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Cargnin, M.A.; Gasparin, B.C.; dos Santos Rosa, D.; Paulino, A.T. Performance of lactase encapsulated in pectin-based hydrogels during lactose hydrolysis reactions. LWT 2021, 150, 111863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jin, W.; Xiang, L.; Peng, D.; Liu, G.; He, J.; Cheng, S.; Li, B.; Huang, Q. Study on the coupling progress of thermo-induced anthocyanins degradation and polysaccharides gelation. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 105, 105822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gómez-Mascaraque, L.G.; Soler, C.; Lopez-Rubio, A. Stability and bioaccessibility of EGCG within edible micro-hydrogels. Chitosan vs. gelatin, a comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 61, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Zhou, T.; Li, J.; Liu, P. Ionically crosslinked alginate-based nanohydrogels for tumor-specific intracellular triggered release: Effect of chemical modification. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 553, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wang, A.; Lin, J.; Zhong, Q. Enteric rice protein-shellac composite coating to enhance the viability of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius NRRL B-30514. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Khan, M.K.I.; Ghauri, Y.M.; Alvi, T.; Amin, U.; Khan, M.I.; Nazir, A.; Saeed, F.; Aadil, R.M.; Nadeem, M.T.; Babu, I. Microwave assisted drying and extraction technique; kinetic modelling, energy consumption and influence on antioxidant compounds of fenugreek leaves. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yan, W.; Zhang, B.; Yadav, M.P.; Feng, L.; Yan, J.; Jia, X.; Yin, L. Corn fiber gum-soybean protein isolate double network hydrogel as oral delivery vehicles for thermosensitive bioactive compounds. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 107, 105865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Alvi, T.; Asif, Z.; Khan, M.K.I. Clean label extraction of bioactive compounds from food waste through microwave-assisted extraction technique—A review. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chen, K.; Zhang, M.; Adhikari, B.; Wang, M. Microencapsulation of Sichuan pepper essential oil in soybean protein isolate-Sichuan pepper seed soluble dietary fiber complex coacervates. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kandekar, U.; Ramdasi, S.; Thakurdesai, P. Fenugreek: Novel delivery technologies and versatile formulation excipients. In Fenugreek, 1st ed.; Ghosh, D., Thakurdesai, P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 363–402. [Google Scholar]
  139. Yadav, H.; Agrawal, R.; Panday, A.; Patel, J.; Maiti, S. Polysaccharide-silicate composite hydrogels: Review on synthesis and drug delivery credentials. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 74, 103573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Khalesi, H.; Lu, W.; Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. Fundamentals of composites containing fibrous materials and hydrogels: A review on design and development for food applications. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Liu, S.; Qamar, S.A.; Qamar, M.; Basharat, K.; Bilal, M. Engineered nanocellulose-based hydrogels for smart drug delivery applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Almagro, L.; Correa-Sabater, J.M.; Sabater-Jara, A.B.; Pedreño, M.Á. Biotechnological production of β-carotene using plant in vitro cultures. Planta 2022, 256, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Park, S.; Mun, S.; Kim, Y.-R. Effect of xanthan gum on lipid digestion and bioaccessibility of β-carotene-loaded rice starch-based filled hydrogels. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Mun, S.; Kim, Y.-R.; McClements, D.J. Control of β-carotene bioaccessibility using starch-based filled hydrogels. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Chen, L.; Tong, Q.; McClements, D.J. Designing hydrogel particles for controlled or targeted release of lipophilic bioactive agents in the gastrointestinal tract. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 72, 698–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Gyles, D.A.; Castro, L.D.; Silva, J.O.C., Jr.; Ribeiro-Costa, R.M. A review of the designs and prominent biomedical advances of natural and synthetic hydrogel formulations. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 88, 373–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Montes, C.; Villaseñor, M.J.; Rios, A. Analytical control of nanodelivery lipid-based systems for encapsulation of nutraceuticals: Achievements and challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Blanco-Fernandez, B.; Puga, A.M.; Concheiro, A. Crosslinked ionic polysaccharides for stimuli-sensitive drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1148–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Qiu, Y.; Park, K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 53, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rayner, M.; Östbring, K.; Purhagen, J. Application of natural polymers in food. In Natural Polymers; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 115–161. [Google Scholar]
  151. Thompson, B.R.; Horozov, T.S.; Stoyanov, S.D.; Paunov, V.N. Structuring and calorie control of bakery products by templating batter with ultra melt-resistant food-grade hydrogel beads. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 2967–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Khalesi, H.; Lu, W.; Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. New insights into food hydrogels with reinforced mechanical properties: A review on innovative strategies. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 285, 102278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Stribiţcaia, E.; Krop, E.M.; Lewin, R.; Holmes, M.; Sarkar, A. Tribology and rheology of bead-layered hydrogels: Influence of bead size on sensory perception. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 104, 105692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gheorghita Puscaselu, R.; Lobiuc, A.; Dimian, M.; Covasa, M. Alginate: From food industry to biomedical applications and management of metabolic disorders. Polymers 2020, 12, 2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Yuan, R. Applications of natural polymer-based hydrogels in the food industry. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Chen, Y., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 357–410. [Google Scholar]
  156. Qi, F.; Meng, Z.; Xue, M.; Qiu, L. Recent advances in self-assemblies and sensing applications of colloidal photonic crystals. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1123, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Wang, Z.; Meng, Z.; Xue, M.; Zhang, H.; Shea, K.J.; Kang, L. Detection of lysozyme in body fluid based on two-dimensional colloidal crystal sensor. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Nesic, A.R.; Seslija, S.I. The influence of nanofillers on physical–chemical properties of polysaccharide-based film intended for food packaging. In Food Packaging: Nanotechnology in the Agri-Food Industry; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 7, pp. 637–697. [Google Scholar]
  159. Haghighi, H.; Licciardello, F.; Fava, P.; Siesler, H.W.; Pulvirenti, A. Recent advances on chitosan-based films for sustainable food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Scarfato, P.; Di Maio, L.; Incarnato, L. Recent advances and migration issues in biodegradable polymers from renewable sources for food packaging. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Attaran, S.A.; Hassan, A.; Wahit, M.U. Materials for food packaging applications based on bio-based polymer nanocomposites: A review. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2017, 30, 143–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Petkoska, A.T.; Daniloski, D.; D’Cunha, N.M.; Naumovski, N.; Broach, A.T. Edible packaging: Sustainable solutions and novel trends in food packaging. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 109981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Véronique, C. Bioactive packaging technologies for extended shelf life of meat-based products. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 90–103. [Google Scholar]
  164. Kerry, J.; O’grady, M.; Hogan, S. Past, current and potential utilisation of active and intelligent packaging systems for meat and muscle-based products: A review. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Vedadghavami, A.; Minooei, F.; Mohammadi, M.H.; Khetani, S.; Kolahchi, A.R.; Mashayekhan, S.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2017, 62, 42–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kraśniewska, K.; Galus, S.; Gniewosz, M. Biopolymers-based materials containing silver nanoparticles as active packaging for food applications–A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Different types of plant- and animal-based ingredients as gelling agents in the food industry. Figure 1 is reprinted with permission from Munir et al. [15] (Copyright © 2022 by authors).
Figure 1. Different types of plant- and animal-based ingredients as gelling agents in the food industry. Figure 1 is reprinted with permission from Munir et al. [15] (Copyright © 2022 by authors).
Gels 09 00001 g001
Figure 3. Different junction zones in polysaccharide gels: (A) connecting points, (B) extended junction zone resembling a block, (C) model of crosslinks in alginate and pectin gels based on an egg-box structure, (D) the region of the double-helix junction, and (E) junction zone for the aggregation of polysaccharide chains. Figure 3 is reprinted with permission from Nazir et al. [8] (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Figure 3. Different junction zones in polysaccharide gels: (A) connecting points, (B) extended junction zone resembling a block, (C) model of crosslinks in alginate and pectin gels based on an egg-box structure, (D) the region of the double-helix junction, and (E) junction zone for the aggregation of polysaccharide chains. Figure 3 is reprinted with permission from Nazir et al. [8] (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Gels 09 00001 g003
Figure 5. The linear viscoelasticity of low-modulus materials extracted from the fluctuation spectrum using particle-tracking microrheology. (A) The probe particle’s trajectory is calculated; (B) the spectrum of average fluctuations is computed as a function of time (t′); and (C) mechanical spectrum in the linear viscoelastic region (LVER). Figure 5 is reprinted with permission from Nazir et al. [8] (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Figure 5. The linear viscoelasticity of low-modulus materials extracted from the fluctuation spectrum using particle-tracking microrheology. (A) The probe particle’s trajectory is calculated; (B) the spectrum of average fluctuations is computed as a function of time (t′); and (C) mechanical spectrum in the linear viscoelastic region (LVER). Figure 5 is reprinted with permission from Nazir et al. [8] (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Gels 09 00001 g005
Figure 6. Illustration of a biopolymer-based delivery system for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds. Figure 6 is reprinted with permission from McClements [128] (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Figure 6. Illustration of a biopolymer-based delivery system for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds. Figure 6 is reprinted with permission from McClements [128] (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Gels 09 00001 g006
Table 3. Different types of hydrogel-based systems for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds.
Table 3. Different types of hydrogel-based systems for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds.
HydrogelsFormBioactive CompoundEncapsulation Efficiency (%)Load CapacityRef.
Pectin-basedCore-shell hydrogel beadsLactase72*[129]
Xanthan gumBiopolymer gelsAnthocyanin**[130]
Gelatin and chitosanGelationEpigallocatechin gallate95*[131]
Alginate-based nanohydrogelNanohydrogelDOX (anticancer drug)9035%[132]
Rice-protein varnishNanocompositeApigenin9192.5 mg·g−1[133]
*: Not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nath, P.C.; Debnath, S.; Sridhar, K.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Nayak, P.K.; Sharma, M. A Comprehensive Review of Food Hydrogels: Principles, Formation Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Its Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9010001

AMA Style

Nath PC, Debnath S, Sridhar K, Inbaraj BS, Nayak PK, Sharma M. A Comprehensive Review of Food Hydrogels: Principles, Formation Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Its Applications. Gels. 2023; 9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nath, Pinku Chandra, Shubhankar Debnath, Kandi Sridhar, Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj, Prakash Kumar Nayak, and Minaxi Sharma. 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Food Hydrogels: Principles, Formation Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Its Applications" Gels 9, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9010001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop