Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
CNF/p(AM-co-KAA) Semi-Interpenetrating Network Hydrogel Fertilizer Carriers for Enhanced Nutrient Use Efficiency, Water Retention, and Salt–Alkali Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Transdermal Nanobilosomal Gel for Magnified Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy of Thymol for Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Restoration of Arid Mining Area Using Lignite-Based Superabsorbent Gel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Keratin-Waste Derived Multifunctional Gel System: Reusable Activated Carbon/Alginate Microbeads for Simultaneous Dye and Pharmaceutical Adsorption

1
Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioengineering of State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Biomedical Research Center, Engineering Research Center of Key Technology and Industrialization of Cell-Based Vaccine, Ministry of Education, Gan-Su Tech Innovation Center of Animal, China-Malaysia National Joint Laboratory, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730124, China
3
School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730124, China
4
Department of Medical, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2026, 12(2), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12020158
Submission received: 13 January 2026 / Revised: 9 February 2026 / Accepted: 9 February 2026 / Published: 11 February 2026

Abstract

The resource utilization of keratin waste has garnered significant attention, yet the processing of yak hair keratin in underdeveloped regions such as Tibet and Qinghai in China remains challenging. This study addresses these concerns by carbonizing yak hair keratin waste using a steam flash explosion (SFE) technique for 150 s, which is followed by activation with KOH at various ratios and subsequent to produce activated carbon (AC) samples. The AC was then combined with sodium alginate (Alg) at different ratios, pH and applied voltage to yield AC−Alg gel microbeads using an electrospinning method. The characterization of the AC and AC–Alg gel microbeads was conducted using SEM, BET, TG, and FT-IR analysis. In adsorption studies, AC−Alg0.5U gel microbeads prepared with optimized conditions (pH 7, 11 kV, 19 G needle) were used to remove dyes (methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO)) and antibiotic minocycline hydrochloride (MH). Various parameters such as temperature, pH, and adsorbent dose were optimized to obtain the maximum adsorption performance under model concentrations. The experimental results showed that the AC−Alg0.5U gel microbeads can effectively adsorb MB and MO with adsorption capacities of 1038.9 mg/g and 206.2 mg/g, respectively. Moreover, the microbeads had the best adsorption performance for MH (1694.2 mg/g), with the kinetics most accurately represented by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.999), and the isotherm followed the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.984). The microbeads maintained a high adsorption capacity of 75% after six cycles. The composite gel microbeads not only utilize yak hair keratin waste but also will be used as durable and favorable adsorbents for the removal of pollutants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Keratin waste, like wool, hair, horns, hooves, and feathers, has been a particularly abundant biopolymer from the industries of slaughterhouses and meat processing plants [1]. A total quantity of approximately 5 million tons of keratin waste is produced annually around the world [2,3]. The keratin-rich wastes are abundantly available, and the yak breeding industries in China has contributed mostly, as about 15 million yaks breeding in China account for roughly 95% of the world’s yak population [4]. The abundant and inexpensive keratin-rich yak resources remain underutilized, since large quantities of yak hair are landfilled or incinerated annually [5]. Hence, the treatment and utilization of this waste are therefore of great significance for environmental protection [6,7].
Due to its high carbon content, keratin holds potential for the production of biochar [8,9] and composite-activated carbon (AC) [10,11]. Previous studies have shown that keratin waste-derived AC with a high adsorption capacity is acknowledged as an efficient and renewable adsorbent material [12] because of its well-matched porous structure and extensive specific surface area, offering considerable economic advantages and making it pivotal for removing water pollutants [13,14,15]. Therefore, utilizing keratin waste to produce AC not only promotes resource upcycling and reduces environmental pollution but also offers cost advantages owing to its high adsorption efficiency [16]. However, the application of powdered AC as an adsorbent has been reported to be limited by the difficulties associated with its separation and regeneration [14,17]. Powdered AC could only be recovered and reused at a lower efficiency through filtration or centrifugation [18], resulting in potential particle loss during water treatment [19] and leading to significant waste and an increase in additional environmental concerns. Therefore, research on the development of AC in a microbead or bead form, achieved by combining AC with other materials [20,21], has focused on enhancing the efficiency of AC separation.
The composite materials used to form beads with AC primarily include chitosan [22], pectin [23], and sodium alginate (Alg) [24]. Alg, a natural anionic polymer commonly obtained from brown algae [25], is one of the most widely employed materials for the preparation of composite AC microbeads due to its easy of hydrogel formation [26], ideal biocompatibility [27], low toxicity, environmental friendliness, biodegradability [28], and economic viability [29]. Nasrullah et al. [30] prepared mangosteen fruit peel-based AC–Alg beads for the efficient removal of methylene blue (MB) with an adsorption capacity of 230 mg/g for a concentration of 100 mg/L MB. Similarly, Liu et al. [31] developed Alg/polyacrylate/AC hydrogel beads that adsorbed Pb(II) as a photocatalyst to excellently degrade Rhodamine B. However, these studies employed the direct injection method for bead preparation, which does not account for the controlled size production of microbeads, particularly smaller ones. Furthermore, the adsorption capacity of the composite beads requires improvement. Although Makhado et al. [32] demonstrated that nanosized AC–SA hydrogel exhibits a higher adsorption capacity, exceeding 1596.0 mg/g, the separation of nanosized gel microspheres also poses a challenge. Therefore, there is a scarcity of both effective adsorption capacity and preparation processes for smaller-sized AC–Alg gel microbeads that can be separated.
Currently, electrospinning has emerged as a highly effective technique for the fabrication of microbeads [33]. This method provides precise control over the size and morphology of microbeads, enabling the production of uniform and spherical particles with tailored properties [34]. The application of the electrospinning method may facilitate the encapsulation of AC and Alg into small-sized AC–Alg gel microbeads, which could enhance the recovery of AC. Additionally, this technique will allow for the controlled production of AC–Alg gel microbeads with improved adsorption performance.
In this study, keratin-rich yak hair waste was rapidly carbonized using a steam flash explosion (SFE) technique for 150 s [35], which was followed by activation with potassium hydroxide (KOH) to produce AC within 1 h. The AC was then crosslinked with Alg to create AC−Alg gel microbeads using the electrostatic spinning method with the optimization of the ratios of AC to Alg and solution pH. The adsorption capacity of the AC−Alg gel microbeads was systematically evaluated for the removal of various pollutants, including cationic dye methyl blue (MB), anionic dye methyl orange (MO), and minocycline hydrochloride (MH).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization Results

2.1.1. Characterization Result of SFEM

Figure 1 illustrates the SEM image and XRD patterns of the carbonized yak hair material (SFEM) prepared using the SFE at 1.5 MPa for 150 s. The SEM image reveals that the surface of the SFEM exhibited significant roughness, which was characterized by the presence of irregular cracks and minor defects following SFE treatment. Additionally, the XRD patterns were analyzed to assess the crystallinity of the samples, showing two distinct broad diffraction peaks at 19.36° and ~43°, corresponding to the (002) [36], (100) and (101) [37,38] crystal planes of graphitic carbon, respectively. The lack of sharp diffraction peaks near these two characteristic peaks typically indicates that the SFEM has an amorphous structure, further confirming the complete carbonization of the yak hair waste achieved through the SFE method over a duration of 150 s.

2.1.2. Characterization Result of AC

To characterize the surface properties of the AC derived from yak hair keratin waste, the FT-IR spectra of the synthesized material were scanned in the range of 500−4000 cm−1. As illustrated in Figure S1, the FT-IR analysis indicated that the AC samples prepared at an activation temperature of 600 °C exhibit the strongest tensile vibrational intensity of C-O bonds in the carboxyl group with both carbonyl and hydroxyl groups significantly contributing to the adsorption properties [39]. Consequently, an activation temperature of 600 °C was selected for AC preparation.
Subsequently, the mass ratio between SFEM and KOH was optimized, and the morphologies of the ACs prepared with varying SFEM/KOH mass ratios were characterized using SEM, as shown in Figure 2A. The results indicate that all the AC samples exhibited irregular pore shapes and structures along with the varying degrees of collapse.
A thermogravimetric (TG) analysis of AC was conducted to investigate its structural properties, as illustrated in Figure 2B. The initial mass loss observed below 200 °C was attributed to the loss of water molecules in the samples, while the subsequent mass loss at the temperatures between 200 °C and 400 °C is primarily due to the volatilization of ammonia, carbon dioxide, water, and sulfur-containing compounds [40]. As shown in Figure 2B, the addition of KOH may reduce the thermal stability of the AC [41], resulting in increased weight loss at higher temperatures of 400–800 °C with a greater proportion of KOH. The weight loss for AC3 and AC5 is pronounced, whereas AC2 and AC4 show greater stability. The surface functional groups of the AC samples (AC2–AC5) were characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy, as shown in Figure 2C. The weak peak in the 1000−1200 cm−1 range corresponded to the -C-O bonds [42]. The peak at 3411 cm−1 was associated with the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl groups in AC [42], while the peak at 1500−1580 cm−1 suggested the presence of -COOH functional groups. The FT-IR spectral analysis indicated that hydroxyl groups are the most abundant functional groups on the AC surface, significantly contributing to the adsorption properties [43]. Among the AC samples, AC4 exhibited a consistent zeta potential in relation to the functional group of this material, as illustrated in Figure S2.
The adsorption capability of AC prepared with varying SFEM/KOH mass ratios was also evaluated with cationic MB dye as the model adsorbate, as shown in Figure 2D. The results illustrated that AC4 had the highest adsorption performance among all of the AC materials. The adsorption properties of AC4 at different pH values and temperatures were further investigated and illustrated with the adsorption kinetic and isothermal simulations (as shown in Figure S3, Tables S1 and S2). The results suggested that the adsorption of MB by AC4 showed a better fit with the pseudo-first-order model (R2 = 0.999) and the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.934), while the maximum adsorption capacity of AC4 for MB was measured at 331.13 mg/g. The stronger adsorption performance exhibited by AC4 might be related to its surface area and pore size. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm analyses of AC4 (Figure 2E) indicated that the surface area and volumes of AC4 were 412.1 m2/g and 3.41 nm, respectively, as shown in Figure 2E.
Based on the above results of SEM, TG, FT-IR, and adsorption performance with MB as the model adsorbate, the formulation of AC4 was chosen as the optimized AC material for microbead preparation in the subsequent adsorption experiments.

2.1.3. Optimization of the Preparation of AC−Alg Microbeads

In the subsequent adsorption study, AC4 was utilized to prepare AC−Alg microbeads. As illustrated in Figure 3A, the SEM results of AC–Alg microbeads with varying AC/Alg mass ratios exhibited a rougher texture with increasing AC content with AC−Alg0.5 exhibiting the roughest surface. Additionally, the FT-IR spectra of the AC−Alg microbeads, as shown in Figure S4, confirmed the successful crosslinking between the particles of AC and Alg.
The TG analysis of the AC−Alg microbeads at varying AC/Alg mass ratios, depicted in Figure 3B, indicates that the initial weight loss observed between 0 °C and 100 °C was attributed to the evaporation of both bound and free water [44]. The thermal degradation of Alg typically occurred at elevated temperatures, specifically between 200 °C and 300 °C, resulting in further weight loss during the degradation of polysaccharide chains of Alg [45]. Among the AC−Alg microbead samples, AC−Alg0.5 microbeads exhibited the least mass loss.
The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm for AC−Alg0.5 microbeads is illustrated in Figure 3C with the corresponding pore structure parameters listed in Table 1. The presence of mesopores (2.99 nm) in the AC−Alg0.5 microbeads was indicated by the type-IV isotherms of the H2 hysteresis loop behavior [46]. Furthermore, the specific surface area of AC−Alg0.5 microbeads was measured to be 381.27 m2/g. The result indicated that the specific surface area of the AC−Alg microbeads increased, while the porosity values decreased with the increasing AC content in the AC−Alg microbeads, which aligns with the SEM results discussed earlier. Additionally, compared to the AC−Alg mixed materials reported in previous studies [47], the AC–Alg0.5 microbeads exhibited a higher specific surface area (as listed in Table S3). Therefore, the mass ratio of AC/Alg (1: 0.5) was identified as optimal for further refinements of the electrospinning preparation conditions, including pH and applied voltage.
The images of AC–Alg0.5 microbeads prepared at different pH levels are presented in Figure 4A, demonstrating that pH variation could affect the surface charge of the Alg molecular chains. This, in turn, affects the intermolecular interactions and the degree of crosslinking between AC and Alg molecules. At higher pH levels, the deprotonation of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups enhances intermolecular and intramolecular electrostatic repulsion, and the size of the microbeads, resulting in an increase in microbead size from 665 ± 52 μm (pH 7.0) to 743 ± 201 μm (pH 11.0), as illustrated in Figure 4B. Conversely, at lower pH levels, the carboxyl groups on Alg become protonated, affecting the dissolution of Alg in the solution. This leads to a reduction in both the intermolecular and intramolecular interactions between Alg and AC, resulting in an increase in microbead size (696 ± 82 μm) and size distribution (11.8%). At an even lower pH of 3.0, Alg molecules precipitate from the aqueous solution, significantly influencing the formation of AC–Alg microbeads via the electrospinning method. Thus, the smallest size and narrowest size distribution of electrostatically sprayed AC−Alg microbeads (665 ± 52 μm, with a distribution of 7.7%) were achieved at pH 7.0. This suggests that the interaction between AC and Alg is more stable under neutral conditions, promoting the formation of microbeads with uniform size.
Furthermore, the effect of the electrospinning voltage on the preparation of AC–Alg microbeads was investigated under the optimized conditions of pH 7.0 and AC/Alg ratios (AC–Alg0.5) with a 19G needle. As shown in Figure 4C, increasing the electrospinning from 9 kV to 13 kV resulted in a significant exponential decrease in the size of the AC–Alg microbeads from 1544 ± 60 μm to 610 ± 62 μm. Concurrently, the error range of the prepared microbeads increased from 3.9% to 10.2%. Moreover, an exponential equation (Equation (1)) with R2 = 0.980 was derived (Figure S5), which describes the relationship between the diameter of the AC–Alg microbeads and electrospinning voltage (kV) as follows:
y = 568,660 e 0.7 x + 520  
where y represents the diameter of the microbeads (μm) and x represents the electrospinning voltage (kV).
The adsorption capacity results of AC−Alg microbeads toward MB dye, shown in Figure S6, indicated that smaller AC−Alg0.5 microbeads exhibited better adsorption performance. Therefore, the optimal preparation conditions of AC–Alg microbeads were determined to be at pH 7.0 and an electrospinning voltage of 11 kV, henceforth denoted as AC–Alg0.5U, for subsequent adsorption measurements.

2.2. Adsorption Capacity of AC−Alg Microbeads

This paper investigated the adsorption characteristics and behavior of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads in the removal of various types of pollutants, including anionic and cationic dyes (methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO)), as well as an antibiotic (minocycline hydrochloride (MH)).

2.2.1. Adsorption Capacity for Dye Pollutants

Figure 5 illustrates the adsorption of MB and MO onto the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads under varying pH levels, temperatures and amounts of microbeads. Increasing the temperature raises the molecular kinetic energy [48], thereby enhancing the interactions between the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads and the dye molecules of MB or MO. Elevated temperatures also promote the swelling of microbead pores, accelerating the internal diffusion of MB or MO molecules on the surface within the pores of the microbeads, ultimately resulting in an increased adsorption of MB or MO onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (see Figure 5A1,B1).
Additionally, the pH of the solution significantly affects the surface charge of the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads, influencing the availability of binding sites and the electrostatic interactions between the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads and MB molecules. As indicated in Figure 5A2, the adsorption capacity of MB onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads increased with increasing solution pH, reaching a maximum at pH = 10.0. As the pH increased, the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads demonstrated enhanced electrostatic attraction to MB due to the deprotonation of functional groups, which increased the negative charge on the microbeads (as corroborated by the zeta potential data of AC shown in Figure S2). Conversely, at a lower pH levels, a higher concentration of hydrogen ions leads to the protonation of binding sites, thereby reducing the affinity of the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads for MB molecules [49]. In contrast, with the anionic MO dye, electrostatic repulsion occurs at pH levels exceeding the dissociation constant of MO, which hinders adsorption. Nonetheless, the removal efficiencies of MO across different pH levels remained relatively consistent, indicating that AC−Alg0.5U microbeads can effectively adsorb MO dye effectively from water solution over a wide pH range [50].
Figure 5A3,B3 illustrate the effect of dosage of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads on adsorption performance, which showed a gradual decrease as the adsorbent dosage increased. This phenomenon occurs because although the number of adsorption sites increases with higher adsorbent dosages, the utilization of these sites per unit mass of adsorbent decreases. As the adsorbent dosage continues to rise, the adsorption sites on the surface become increasingly occupied, leading to a decline in the adsorbent’s unit adsorption capacity.
To further analyze the adsorption performance of MB and MO onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads, both pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were applied to the experimental data (see Figure 5A4,A5,B4,B5). The results revealed that the pseudo-first-order model (R2 = 0.877) fitted better for MB, indicating that the adsorption rate may be more closely related to the concentration of the reactants than to that of the product. Conversely, the adsorption of MO at various temperatures and pH levels is well described by the pseudo-second-order model with an R2 value of 0.999 (as listed in Table 2). This finding suggests the possibility of a chemisorption process occurring between MO and AC–Alg0.5U microbeads.
Furthermore, the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.984 for MB; R2 = 0.999 for MO) demonstrated a better fitting compared to the Freundlich model, as listed in Table 3. This suggests that a monolayer of homogeneous adsorption occurs on the surface of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (see Figure 5A6,A7,B6,B7). These results indicated that diffusion may be a significant factor influencing the adsorption of both MB and MO onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads.

2.2.2. Adsorption Capacity for Minocycline Hydrochloride

As shown in Figure 6, the effects of temperature, pH, and adsorbent dosage on the adsorption capacity of MH onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads were investigated. Within the temperature range of 15 °C to 25 °C, the adsorption capacity increased, which can be attributed to the enhanced movement of the MH molecules at higher temperatures. As the temperature rises, the acceleration of molecular diffusion facilitates increased interactions between MH molecules and the pore sites of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads, thereby enhancing adsorption [51]. However, at higher temperatures above 25 °C, excessive molecular movement may lead to collisions that hinder effective adsorption on the microbead surface, ultimately reducing adsorption efficiency. This decrease might be further exacerbated by the thermal instability of MH at elevated temperatures.
Additionally, increasing the microbead dosage (Figure 6C) resulted in a gradual decrease in adsorption capacity, which is similar to the trends observed in previous studies on the adsorption of MB and MO by AC–Alg0.5U microbeads.
To analyze the adsorption process, pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were applied to fit the experimental data (Figure 6D,E) [52]. The results indicated that the pseudo-second-order model (R2 = 0.999) provided a better fit (as listed in Table 4) with the theoretical adsorption value closely aligning with the experimental values. This finding suggests that the adsorption may be consistent with a chemisorption mechanism.
Moreover, the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.984) provided a slightly better fit compared to the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.980), as listed in Table 5. This suggests that it is highly likely that a monolayer of homogeneous adsorption occurred on the surface of the microbeads.

2.3. Reusability of the Microbeads

With MB as the adsorbent, the reusability of the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads was evaluated mainly based on the decrease in adsorption capacity, as shown in Figure 7. After the first adsorption cycle, the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads were regenerated with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH to desorb the adsorbed dye molecules, rinsed to neutrality, and re-employed in the consecutive adsorption–regeneration cycles.
After six consecutive cycles, the adsorption capacity of AC–Alg0.5U microbeads declined from 182.7 mg/g to 132.0 mg/g when 0.1 M HCl was used as eluent, whereas an equivalent protocol with 0.1 M NaOH reduced the adsorption capacity from 179.2 mg/g to 106.4 mg/g (Figure 7). The superior performance of HCl is attributed to protonation of surface sites. H+ ions bind to the adsorption sites of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads, promoting ion exchange interactions and facilitating the release of MB molecules from the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads during acidic desorption [53]. In contrast, the high Na+ concentration in NaOH solution would occupy the negatively charged group (-COO) sites of Alg, thereby displacing the adsorbed MB into the solution. However, Na+ showed weak competitiveness and the -COO group of Alg remains, and some of the adsorption sites may be retained, resulting in incomplete desorption. Consequently, 0.1 M HCl provides a stronger desorption ability than 0.1 M NaOH. Overall, the above results suggest that AC–Alg0.5U microbeads were an adsorbate capable of adsorbing various water pollutants—mainly, the microbeads could be easily separated and regenerated.

3. Conclusions

In this study, keratin-rich yak hair waste was rapidly carbonized by SFE treatment for 150 s at 1.5 MPa to obtain carbonized SFEM, which was followed by activation with KOH, yielding yak hair-based AC within 1 h at 600 °C. The synthesized yak hair-based AC was combined with Alg in various mass ratios, pH, and applied voltage to prepare small-sized AC−Alg microbeads using the electrospinning method, which was utilized for pollutant removal in water. With the optimized AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (665 ± 52 μm, wet state), the adsorption capacity of AC−Alg0.5U was systematically studied with different kinds of pollutants, including MB, MO, and antibiotic MH, which supported that the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads exhibit favorable adsorption capacity for various pollutants with model concentration. This paper identifies the following optimum parameters for AC–Alg0.5U: for MB—35 °C, pH 10.0, dosage 0.1 g L−1; for MO—15 °C, pH 2–10, dosage 0.1 g L−1; and for MH—25 °C, pH 8.0, dosage 0.1 g L−1 under the model concentrations used in this experiment. Six adsorption–desorption cycles with 0.1 M HCl restore 72% of the original adsorption capacity, confirming good reusability. This paper highlights the use of keratin-rich yak hair waste into the AC−Alg microbeads as potential adsorbents, which has a certain degree of reusability in terms of adsorption performance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Reagents

Yak hair was supplied by the Gannan region of Gansu Province, China. The reagents used in this study were analytical grade reagents and purchased from Tianjin Bailens Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China), Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute (Tianjin, China), Shanghai Zhongtai Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), Tianjin Best Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), Shanghai Zhongqin Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and Agilent Technologies Ltd. (Santa Clara, CA, USA) without undergoing additional purification. All solutions were prepared with ultrapure water from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA).

4.2. Preparation of Activated Carbon

In this experiment, AC was prepared from yak hair sourced from the Gannan region of China. The preparation process involved the following steps, as illustrated in Scheme 1: (1) Carbonization: After thorough cleaning and drying, the yak hair was rapidly carbonized using steam flash explosion (SFE) technology at 1.5 MPa for 150 s with a QB-300B model continuous feeder (Tsing-Gentle Eco-technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China), and then washed thoroughly with ultrapure water, following drying to remove impurities. The resulting carbonized material was termed SFEM. (2) Activation: The SFEM was activated using KOH as the reference [54]. SFEM was mixed with KOH at various ratios (g/g, SFEM/KOH, 1: 2, 1: 3, 1: 4, and 1: 5) to prepare AC at 600 °C (see Figure S1 for the specific temperature selection) for 1 h under N2 atmosphere with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. After activation, the materials were washed with ultrapure water until neutralization. Subsequently, they were dried, sieved, and ground to yield the final AC products (designated as AC2, AC3, AC4, and AC5).

4.3. Preparation of AC−Alg Microbeads

In this experiment, AC–Alg microbeads were prepared with an electrostatic spinning method. The preparation process of the AC−Alg microbeads involved three steps. (1) Dissolution: Alg was dissolved in 100 mL water and stirred at 80 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, AC was added to Alg solution in predetermined ratios (AC/Alg, g/g). The mixture was then stirred continuously and sonicated to ensure homogenization and eliminate air bubbles. (2) Electrostatic spinning: Utilizing the principle that the high viscosity of Alg was subjected to high voltage during electrostatic spinning, which could effectively counteract the aggregation effects associated with high concentrations of Alg, allowing for the formation of smaller-sized microbeads, the mixed solution (AC and Alg) was dripped into 2% CaCl2 solution using an electrostatic spinning device and stirred for 30 min to achieve stable curing. (3) Post-preparation processing: After preparation, the microbeads were thoroughly washed with ultrapure water to remove impurities and unreacted CaCl2 and then freeze-dried to obtain AC−Alg microbeads.
During the preparation of the AC–Alg microbeads, the effects including the ratios of AC/Alg (g/g 1: 3, 1: 2, 1: 1, and 1: 0.5, designated as AC−Alg3, AC−Alg2, AC−Alg1, and AC−Alg0.5, respectively, electrospinning at 10 kV with 19G needle, the inner diameter of 19G needle is 0.75 μm), the pH of the mixed solution of AC/Alg (3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0, and 11.0, electrospinning at 11 kV with 19G needle), and the applied voltage (9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 kV) were investigated. The images of the microbeads were taken using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX73, Tokyo, Japan), 4×.

4.4. Characterization of AC and AC−Alg Microbeads

The crystal structure of the SFEM samples was analyzed using the X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement (PANalytical Empyrean, Almelo, The Netherlands), employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) over a 2θ range of 10° to 80°. The morphology of SFEM, AC, and AC−Alg microbeads was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU8220, Tokyo, Japan). The surface charge of AC was detected by a Nano ZSE MAL instrument (Malvern, UK) at different pH levels. The adsorption capacity was evaluated through N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K using a surface area and porosity analyzer (Mike ASAP 2460, Norcross, GA, USA). During the desorption phase, the pore size distribution was estimated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) analysis method [55]. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the AC and AC−Alg microbeads were characterized using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Nicolet iS10, Waltham, MA, USA). The thermal characterization of AC and AC−Alg microbeads was conducted with thermogravimetric (TG) analysis (NETZSCH TG 209 F3, Selb, Germany) to assess the weight changes during the heating.

4.5. Adsorption Experiment

The adsorption capacity of the optimized AC−Alg0.5U microbeads was evaluated using various model adsorbates including the cationic dye MB, anionic dye MO, and the antibiotic MH. For the adsorption experiments, 0.1 g/L of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads was added to the adsorbate solution and agitated on a shaker at 200 rpm (IS-RDV1, Crystal, MN, USA). The adsorption capacity of the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads for these adsorbates was investigated at varying temperature (15–35 °C) and pH (2.0–10.0). The adsorption capacity was calculated using Equation (2) [56].
Q t = C 0 C t V / m
where C0 represents the initial concentration (mg/L) of the adsorbates, Ct (mg/L) represents the concentration of the adsorbates at reaction time t, V represents the volume of the solution (L), m represents the mass of the adsorbent, and Qt represents the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at the reaction time t.
When equilibrium is reached, the equilibrium adsorption capacity (Qe, mg/g) is calculated by substituting Ct with the equilibrium concentration Ce, and performed in triplicate, the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
The adsorption kinetics of the above pollutants onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads were studied with the batch adsorption experiment at room temperature with samples collected at 5 min intervals for analysis using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (GENESYS 10S UV-VIS, Madison, WI, USA) (the initial wavelength for MH was set at 355 nm [57], the initial wavelength for MO was set at 466 nm [58], and the initial wavelength for MB was set at 664 nm [59]). The experimental data were fitted using both the pseudo-first-order model (Equation (3)) and pseudo-second-order model (Equation (4)) [60].
l n Q e Q t = l n Q e k 1 t
t / Q t   = 1 / k 2 Q e 2 + 1 / Q e   ×   t
where Qe and Qt represent the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at equilibrium and specific moments t, respectively, and k 1 and k 2 represent the rate constants associated with the quasi-primary kinetic model equation (min−1) and quasi-secondary kinetic model equation (g·min·mg−1), respectively.
Adsorption isotherms described the interactions between the adsorbate and adsorbent at the equilibrium state during the adsorption process. In this experiment, Langmuir (Equation (5)) and Freundlich adsorption isotherms (Equation (6)) [61] were employed to fit the equilibrium adsorption data across various concentrations of MB, MO, and MH, respectively.
1 Q e = 1 K L Q m C e + 1 Q m
ln Q e = ln K F + 1 / n ln C e
where KL represents the Langmuir constant (L/mg), Qm represents the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), 1/n represents an empirical constant indicating the strength of adsorption, and KF represents the adsorption rate constant ((mg/g) (L/mg) (1/n)).
For cycling experiments, saturated AC−Alg0.5U microbeads were regenerated via the addition of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH followed by stirring at room temperature for 1 h (200 r/min). After regeneration, the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads were rinsed thoroughly with deionized water to remove any residual acid or base until the solution reaches neutrality. This cycle was repeated six times to assess the reusability of the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/gels12020158/s1, Figure S1: FT-IR result of AC synthesized at different activation temperatures (550, 600, and 650 °C); Figure S2: Zeta potentials of AC4 at various pH; Figure S3: (A) Influence of temperature on the adsorption efficiency of MB on AC4, (B) influence of pH on the adsorption efficiency of MB on AC4 (initial concentration of MB is 200 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L), (C) the adsorption kinetics of MB on AC4, and (D) the adsorption isotherm of MB on AC4 (initial concentration of MB is range from 10–400 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L); Table S1: The adsorption kinetic parameters of MB on AC4; Table S2: The adsorption isotherms parameters of MB on AC4; Figure S4: FT-IR of AC, Alg, and AC−Alg0.5 microbeads; Figure S5: The relationship between the applied voltage of electrospinning and the diameter of the AC–Alg0.5 microbeads (at pH 7.0 and 19G needle), solid line represents nonlinear fitting. Different sized AC–Alg0.5 microbeads were prepared by varying the applied voltage; Figure S6: The adsorption kinetics of MB onto different sized AC−Alg microbeads (the initial concentration of MB is 100 mg/L, the concentration of the microbeads is 0.1 g/L); Table S3: Compared porous properties of AC−Alg microbeads with the literature.

Author Contributions

Y.W.: Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis. L.Z.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Software, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. Z.L. (Zhiying Li): Investigation, Data curation, Validation. Q.X.: Investigation, Data curation, Validation. Z.T.: Investigation, Data curation. G.Z.: Investigation. Z.L. (Zhiqiang Li): Conceptualization. Z.W.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22464016, 52463015), the Scientific Research Project for Talents Introduced by Northwest Minzu University (xbmuyjrc202226, xbmuyjrc202227), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (23JRRA718), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (31920250002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ming Foong Tiang for his assistance in revising this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yan, R.R.; Gong, J.S.; Su, C.; Liu, Y.L.; Qian, J.Y.; Xu, Z.H.; Shi, J.S. Preparation and Applications of Keratin Biomaterials from Natural Keratin Wastes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 2349–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Slootweg, J.C. Using Waste as Resource to Realize a Circular Economy: Circular Use of C, N and P. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2020, 23, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Senthilkumar, N.; Chowdhury, S.; Sanpui, P. Extraction of Keratin from Keratinous Wastes: Current Status and Future Directions. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2022, 25, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ou, J.; Zou, L.; Jin, F.; Wu, S.; Wang, J. Hierarchically Porous Nitrogen, Oxygen-Rich Carbons Derived from Filter Paper for High-Performance Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. Powder Technol. 2020, 371, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reddy, K.S.K.; Al Shoaibi, A.; Srinivasakannan, C.A. Comparison of Microstructure and Adsorption Characteristics of Activated Carbons by CO2 and H3PO4 Activation from Date Palm Pits. New Carbon Mater. 2012, 27, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chaitanya Reddy, C.; Khilji, I.A.; Gupta, A.; Bhuyar, P.; Mahmood, S.; Saeed Al-Japairai, K.A.; Chua, G.K. Valorization of Keratin Waste Biomass and Its Potential Applications. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mouro, C.; Martins, R.; Gomes, A.P.; Gouveia, I.C. Upcycling Wool Waste into Keratin Gel-Based Nanofibers Using Deep Eutectic Solvents. Gels 2023, 9, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zahra, H.; Selinger, J.; Sawada, D.; Ogawa, Y.; Orelma, H.; Ma, Y.; Kumagai, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Hummel, M. Evaluation of Keratin–Cellulose Blend Fibers as Precursors for Carbon Fibers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 8314–8325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Zaman, F.; Peng, Q.; Huang, Y. Structural Engineering on Keratin to Tailor Porous Structure of Biochar for High-Efficiency Tetracycline Removal. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 315, 144408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakro, V.; Lotha, T.N.; Ao, K.; Ao, I.; Ritse, V.; Rudithongru, L.; Pongener, C.; Aier, M.; Sinha, D.; Jamir, L. Recent Advances in Applications of Animal Biowaste-Based Activated Carbon as Biosorbents of Water Pollutants: A Mini-Review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aldawsari, A.M.; Alsohaimi, I.H.; Hassan, H.M.A. Silica-Integrated Chemically Modified Human Hair Waste: A Novel Nanocomposite for Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Water. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025, 172, 113747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, Y.; Xu, S.; Yue, Q.; Ortaboy, S.; Gao, B.; Sun, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Heteroatom-Enriched Biochar from Keratin-Based and Algous-Based Wastes. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kong, J.J.; Yue, Q.Y.; Zhao, P.; Gao, B.Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.S. Comparative Study on Microstructure and Surface Properties of Keratin and Lignocellulosic-Based Activated Carbons. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 140, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mousavi-Qeydari, S.R.; Samimi, A.; Mohebbi-Kalhori, D.; Ahmadi, E. A Novel Activated Carbon from Human Hair Waste: Synthesis, Characterization and Utilization Thereof as an Efficient, Reusable Ni (II) Adsorbent. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venkatesan, N.; Krishna, A.; Fathima, N.N. Leather Solid Waste Derived Activated Carbon as a Potential Material for Various Applications: A Review. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2023, 176, 106249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hossain, M.A.; Sultana, R.; Moktadir, M.A.; Hossain, M.A. A Novel Bio-Adsorbent Development from Tannery Solid Waste Derived Biodegradable Keratin for the Removal of Hazardous Chromium: A Cleaner and Circular Economy Approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 413, 137471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, H. Insights into the Glyphosate Removal Efficiency by Using Magnetic Powder Activated Carbon Composite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 254, 117662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeirani, Z.; Niu, C.H.; Soltan, J. Adsorption of Emerging Pollutants on Activated Carbon. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2017, 33, 491–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, C.; Lu, J.; Li, S.; Tong, Y.; Ye, B. Synthesis of Magnetic Microspheres with Sodium Alginate and Activated Carbon for Removal of Methylene Blue. Materials 2017, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.I.; Yamamoto, T.; Endo, A.; Ohmori, T.; Nakaiwa, M. Adsorption of Phenol and Reactive Dyes from Aqueous Solution on Carbon Cryogel Microspheres with Controlled Porous Structure. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 96, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.; He, L. Microwave Irradiation Assisted Preparation of Chitosan Composite Microsphere for Dye Adsorption. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sait, H.H.; Hussain, A.; Bassyouni, M.; Ali, I.; Kanthasamy, R.; Ayodele, B.V.; Elhenawy, Y. Anionic Dye Removal Using a Date Palm Seed-Derived Activated Carbon/Chitosan Polymer Microbead Biocomposite. Polymers 2022, 14, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, R.S.; Li, Y.; Shuai, X.X.; Liang, R.H.; Chen, J.; Liu, C.M. Pectin/Activated Carbon-Based Porous Microsphere for Pb2+ Adsorption: Characterization and Adsorption Behaviour. Polymers 2021, 13, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arafa, E.G.; Gawad, O.F.A.; Eldin, Z.E.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Abd-Elghafour, S.A.; Osman, A.H.M. Sustainable Sodium Alginate Hydrogels Incorporating Banana Leaf Activated Carbon and Organo-Clay for Enhanced Dye Removal. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 16197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gao, X.; Guo, C.; Hao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Long, H.; Li, M. Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions by Sodium Alginate Based Adsorbent-A Review and New Perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4423–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, S.; Li, Y.; Zhu, K.; Wang, C.; Zhai, S. Advances in Structure Designing and Function Tailoring Strategy toward Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Efficient Water Remediation: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 304, 140801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abka-Khajouei, R.; Tounsi, L.; Shahabi, N.; Patel, A.K.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. Structures, Properties and Applications of Alginates. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Lu, Z.; Li, M.; Hurren, C.; Wang, D. Photopolymerized Multifunctional Sodium Alginate-Based Hydrogel for Antibacterial and Coagulation Dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hui, Y.; Liu, R.; Lan, J.; Li, L.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, A.; Wei, X. Sodium Alginate Based Adsorbent: Facile Fabrication, Extraordinary Removal Efficacy of Anionic Dyes and Adsorption Mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nasrullah, A.; Bhat, A.H.; Naeem, A.; Isa, M.H.; Danish, M. High Surface Area Mesoporous Activated Carbon-Alginate Beads for Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1792–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Xi, Y.; Huang, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, Z.; Xu, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, X. Adsorption of Lead Ions by Activated Carbon Doped Sodium Alginate/Sodium Polyacrylate Hydrogel Beads and Their In-Situ Recycle as Sustainable Photocatalysts. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 645, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Makhado, E.; Hato, M.J. Preparation and Characterization of Sodium Alginate-Based Oxidized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Hydrogel Nanocomposite and Its Adsorption Behaviour for Methylene Blue Dye. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 576913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, W.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, C.; Zhu, Q.; Luo, X.; Liu, W.; You, L.; Tang, S. Preparation of Agarose Acetate Microspheres by Electrostatic Spraying for Potential Use as Dermal Fillers. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 44, 2352–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, X.; Tiang, M.F.; Cui, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Takriff, M.S.; Sajab, M.S.; Abdul, P.M.; Ding, G. Precisely Controlled Electrostatically Sprayed Sodium Alginate/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogel Microbeads as Super-Adsorbent for Adsorption of Cationic Dye. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, H.; Wang, Z.; Sajab, M.S.; Abdul, P.M.; Ding, G. A Novel Chitinous Nanoparticles Prepared and Characterized with Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens L.) Using Steam Flash Explosion Treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 230, 123210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mohan, D.; Abhishek, K.; Sarswat, A.; Patel, M.; Singh, P.; Pittman, C.U. Biochar Production and Applications in Soil Fertility and Carbon Sequestration–A Sustainable Solution to Crop-Residue Burning in India. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 508–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mandal, S.; Singh, R.; Roy, D.; Mukhopadhyay, K.; Dwivedi, M.; Joshi, M. Insights into the Hierarchical Geometries of Hybrid Low-Dimensional Carbons. Discov. Mater. 2024, 4, 43939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Souhuat, A.; Aritonang, H.F.; Koleangan, H.S.J. Koleangan, Magnetically Active GO-Fe3O4 Nanocomposite for Enhanced Rhodamine B Removal Efficiency. Indones. J. Chem. 2024, 24, 1784–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jia, Y.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Li, E.; Zhao, L.; Guo, L. Study on the Adsorption Mechanism of Polar and Non-Polar VOCs by the Activated Carbon with Surface Oxygen. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 490, 151907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoang, T.D.; Liu, Y.; Le, M.T. Performance of CO2 Adsorption on Modified Activated Carbons Derived from Okara Powder Waste: Impacts of Ammonia Impregnation. Processes 2024, 12, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, W.; Gong, M.; Li, K.; Xia, M.; Chen, Z.; Xiao, H.; Fang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. Insight into KOH Activation chanism During Biomass Pyrolysis: Chemical Reactions Between O-Containing Groups and KOH. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shahrokhi-Shahraki, R.; Benally, C.; El-Din, M.G.; Park, J. High Efficiency Removal of Heavy Metals Using Tire-Derived Activated Carbon vs Commercial Activated Carbon: Insights into the Adsorption Mechanisms. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hongo, T.; Moriura, M.; Hatada, Y.; Abiko, H. Simultaneous Methylene Blue Adsorption and pH Neutralization of Contaminated Water by Rice Husk Ash. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21604–21612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xun, X.M.; Zhang, Z.A.; Yuan, Z.X.; Tuhong, K.; Yan, C.H.; Zhan, Y.F.; Kang, G.P.; Wu, Q.Y.; Wang, J. Novel Caffeic Acid Grafted Chitosan-Sodium Alginate Microcapsules Generated by Microfluidic Technique for the Encapsulation of Bioactive Peptides from Silkworm Pupae. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 32, 100974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El-Sheekh, M.M.; Deyab, M.A.; Hassan, N.I.; Abu Ahmed, S.E. Green Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Sodium Alginate Extracted from Sargassum Latifolium and Their Antibacterial Activity. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 2022, 33, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ncibi, M.C.; Gaspard, S.; Sillanpää, M. As-Synthesized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for the Removal of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Masod, M.B.; El-Fiqi, A.M.; Ebiad, A. Encapsulation of Activated Carbon into Calcium Alginate Microspheres toward Granular-Activated Carbon Adsorbents for Elemental Mercury Capture from Natural Gas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 82199–82216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoc, T.N.; Sy Khang, D.; Duy Hai, T.; Thi Nga, D.; Dinh Tuan, P. Methylene Blue Adsorption Mechanism of Activated Carbon Synthesised from Cashew Nut Shells. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 26563–26570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, L.; Wan, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhai, R.; Zhang, B.; Liu, J. The Removal of Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Alginate-Halloysite Nanotube Beads. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 187, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xue, H.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Dhaouadi, F.; Sellaoui, L.; Seliem, M.K.; Ben Lamine, A.; Belmabrouk, H.; Bajahzar, A.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; et al. Adsorption of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution on Activated Carbons and Composite Prepared from an Agricultural Waste Biomass: A Comparative Study by Experimental and Advanced Modeling Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, D.; Zheng, W.; Wang, T.; Liu, F.; Cheng, T.; Chen, H.; Miao, T. Influence of Temperature on the Adsorption and Diffusion of Heavy Oil in Quartz Nanopore: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Energies 2022, 15, 5870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, J.E.; Bhatia, S.K.; Song, H.J.; Yoo, E.; Jeon, H.J.; Yoon, J.Y.; Yang, Y.; Gurav, R.; Yang, Y.H.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Adsorptive Removal of Tetracycline from Aqueous Solution by Maple Leaf-Derived Biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yaacoubi, F.E.; Sekkouri, C.; Ennaciri, K.; Rabichi, I.; Izghri, Z.; Baçaoui, A.; Yaacoubi, A. Synthesis of Composites from Activated Carbon Based on Olive Stones and Sodium Alginate for the Removal of Methylene Blue. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bag, O.; Tekin, K.; Karagoz, S. Microporous Activated Carbons from Lignocellulosic Biomass by KOH Activation. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2020, 28, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barrett, E.P.; Joyner, L.G.; Halenda, P.P. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 73, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ge, X.; Liu, J.; Song, X.; Wang, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H. Hierarchical Iron Containing γ-MnO2 Hollow Microspheres: A Facile One-Step Synthesis and Effective Removal of As (III) Via Oxidation and Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 301, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fan, Z.; Fang, J.; Zhang, G.; Qin, L.; Fang, Z.; Jin, L. Improved Adsorption of Tetracycline in Water by a Modified Caulis Spatholobi Residue Biochar. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 30543–30553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bardajee, G.R.; Mahmoodian, H.; Boraghi, S.A.; Elmizadeh, H.; Ziarani, N.B.; Rezanejad, Z.; Tyagi, I.; Gaur, R.; Javadian, H. Nanoporous Hydrogel Absorbent Based on Salep: Swelling Behavior and Methyl Orange Adsorption Capacity. Environ. Res. 2023, 225, 115571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kondaveeti, S.; Mondal, A.K.; Varghese, S.; Sathish, C.I.; Akter, F.; Kuzhiumparambil, U.; Ralph, P. Ulvan-Based Composite Aerogels for Efficient Methylene Blue Adsorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 309, 142687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Revellame, E.D.; Fortela, D.L.; Sharp, W.; Hernandez, R.; Zappi, M.E. Adsorption Kinetic Modeling Using Pseudo-First Order and Pseudo-Second Order Rrate Laws: A Review. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2020, 1, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hevira, L.; Zilfa; Rahmayeni; Ighalo, J.O.; Aziz, H.; Zein, R. Terminalia Catappa Shell as Low-Cost Biosorbent for the Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solutions. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 97, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A): SEM image and (B): XRD pattern of the carbonized material (SFEM) prepared from yak hair keratin waste with the steam flash explosion (SFE) method within 150 s at 1.5 MPa.
Figure 1. (A): SEM image and (B): XRD pattern of the carbonized material (SFEM) prepared from yak hair keratin waste with the steam flash explosion (SFE) method within 150 s at 1.5 MPa.
Gels 12 00158 g001
Figure 2. (A): SEM images of AC prepared with varying SFEM/KOH mass ratios (AC2 (1:2), AC3 (1:3), AC4 (1:4), and AC5 (1:5)), (B): TG results of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios, (C): FT-IR of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios, (D): MB adsorption performance of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios (initial MB concentration is 150 mg/L, AC dose is 0.5 g/L), (E): N2−adsorption/desorption isotherms for AC4.
Figure 2. (A): SEM images of AC prepared with varying SFEM/KOH mass ratios (AC2 (1:2), AC3 (1:3), AC4 (1:4), and AC5 (1:5)), (B): TG results of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios, (C): FT-IR of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios, (D): MB adsorption performance of AC synthesized with different SFEM/KOH mass ratios (initial MB concentration is 150 mg/L, AC dose is 0.5 g/L), (E): N2−adsorption/desorption isotherms for AC4.
Gels 12 00158 g002
Figure 3. (A): SEM images of the microbeads synthesized at varying AC/Alg mass ratios (AC−Alg3, AC−Alg2, AC−Alg1, and AC−Alg0.5), (B): TG analysis of AC−Alg microbeads synthesized at varying AC/Alg mass ratios (AC−Alg3, AC−Alg2, AC−Alg1, and AC−Alg0.5), (C): N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and pore size distribution curves of AC−Alg0.5 microbeads (AC/Alg microbeads were prepared with electrospinning method at pH 7.0, with 19G needle, and 10 kV).
Figure 3. (A): SEM images of the microbeads synthesized at varying AC/Alg mass ratios (AC−Alg3, AC−Alg2, AC−Alg1, and AC−Alg0.5), (B): TG analysis of AC−Alg microbeads synthesized at varying AC/Alg mass ratios (AC−Alg3, AC−Alg2, AC−Alg1, and AC−Alg0.5), (C): N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and pore size distribution curves of AC−Alg0.5 microbeads (AC/Alg microbeads were prepared with electrospinning method at pH 7.0, with 19G needle, and 10 kV).
Gels 12 00158 g003
Figure 4. (A): Images of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at different pH levels, (B): Size distribution of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at different pH levels (AC–Alg0.5, 19G needle, 11 kV), (C): Images of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at varying electrospinning voltage, (D): Size distribution of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at varying electrospinning voltages (AC–Alg0.5, pH 7.0, 19G needle).
Figure 4. (A): Images of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at different pH levels, (B): Size distribution of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at different pH levels (AC–Alg0.5, 19G needle, 11 kV), (C): Images of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at varying electrospinning voltage, (D): Size distribution of AC–Alg microbeads prepared at varying electrospinning voltages (AC–Alg0.5, pH 7.0, 19G needle).
Gels 12 00158 g004
Figure 5. The adsorption efficiency of MB onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions. (A1): Temperature, (A2): pH, (A3): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (A4): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MB adsorption, (A5): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MB adsorption, (A6): Langmuir isotherm for MB on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (A7): Freundlich isotherm for MB on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MB is 200 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, during the adsorption isotherm measurement, the initial concentration of MB is range from 50–400 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, room temperature). The adsorption efficiency of MO onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions. (B1): Temperature, (B2): pH, (B3): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (B4): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MO adsorption, (B5): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MO adsorption, (B6): Langmuir isotherm for MO on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (B7): Freundlich isotherm of MO on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MO is 200 mg/L. During the adsorption isotherm measurement, the initial concentration of MO ranges 10–100 mg/L, the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, room temperature). Note: the concentration range and initial concentration are intended for experimental analysis and should be interpreted within this context.
Figure 5. The adsorption efficiency of MB onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions. (A1): Temperature, (A2): pH, (A3): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (A4): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MB adsorption, (A5): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MB adsorption, (A6): Langmuir isotherm for MB on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (A7): Freundlich isotherm for MB on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MB is 200 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, during the adsorption isotherm measurement, the initial concentration of MB is range from 50–400 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, room temperature). The adsorption efficiency of MO onto AC–Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions. (B1): Temperature, (B2): pH, (B3): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (B4): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MO adsorption, (B5): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MO adsorption, (B6): Langmuir isotherm for MO on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (B7): Freundlich isotherm of MO on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MO is 200 mg/L. During the adsorption isotherm measurement, the initial concentration of MO ranges 10–100 mg/L, the AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, room temperature). Note: the concentration range and initial concentration are intended for experimental analysis and should be interpreted within this context.
Gels 12 00158 g005
Figure 6. The adsorption efficiency of MH on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions, (A): Temperature, (B): pH, (C): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (D): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MH adsorption, and (E): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MH adsorption, the initial concentration of MH is 200 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L. (F): Langmuir isotherm for MH on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (G): Freundlich isotherm for MH on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MH is range from 50 to 400 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, pH = 7, room temperature). Note: the adsorption concentration range and initial concentration are intended for experimental analysis and should be interpreted within this context.
Figure 6. The adsorption efficiency of MH on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads at various conditions, (A): Temperature, (B): pH, (C): AC−Alg0.5U dosage, (D): Pseudo-first-order kinetics of MH adsorption, and (E): Pseudo-second-order kinetics of MH adsorption, the initial concentration of MH is 200 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L. (F): Langmuir isotherm for MH on AC–Alg0.5U microbeads, and (G): Freundlich isotherm for MH on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads (the initial concentration of MH is range from 50 to 400 mg/L, microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, pH = 7, room temperature). Note: the adsorption concentration range and initial concentration are intended for experimental analysis and should be interpreted within this context.
Gels 12 00158 g006
Figure 7. Regeneration cycles of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads for MB (the concertation of MB is 200 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, 25 °C).
Figure 7. Regeneration cycles of AC−Alg0.5U microbeads for MB (the concertation of MB is 200 mg/L, AC−Alg0.5U microbeads dosage is 0.1 g/L, 25 °C).
Gels 12 00158 g007
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of AC combined with steam flash explosion (SFE) and pyrolysis, and the preparation of AC−Alg microbeads by electrospinning.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of AC combined with steam flash explosion (SFE) and pyrolysis, and the preparation of AC−Alg microbeads by electrospinning.
Gels 12 00158 sch001
Table 1. BET parameters of AC−Alg microbeads synthesized at varying ratios of AC/Alg.
Table 1. BET parameters of AC−Alg microbeads synthesized at varying ratios of AC/Alg.
MaterialsSBET (m2/g)Pore Size (nm)Vt (cm3/g)
AC−Alg316.2315.610.066
AC−Alg222.3416.170.093
AC−Alg130.3612.050.096
AC−Alg0.5381.272.990.287
Table 2. The adsorption kinetics parameters of MB or MO on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Table 2. The adsorption kinetics parameters of MB or MO on AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Kinetic Model Kinetic Parameters
(MB)
Kinetic Parameters
(MO)
Pseudo-first-orderQe,exp (mg/g)
k1 (min−1)
Qe,cal (mg/g)
R2
861.1
3.24 × 10−4
859.6
0.877
203.3
0.0212
60.43
0.905
Pseudo-second-orderk2 (g·min·mg−1)
Qe,cal (mg/g)
R2
7.65 × 10−5
105.26
0.856
9.28 × 10−4
207.04
0.999
Table 3. The adsorption isotherm parameters of MB or MO onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Table 3. The adsorption isotherm parameters of MB or MO onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Isotherm Model Isotherm Parameters
(MB)
Isotherm Parameters
(MO)
Langmuir KL (L/mg)
Qm (mg/g)
R2
0.0119
1038.9
0.984
0.526
206.2
0.999
FreundlichKF [(mg/g) (L/mg) (1/n)]
1/n
R2
19.33
0.702
0.949
75.56
0.286
0.851
Table 4. The adsorption kinetics parameters of MH onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Table 4. The adsorption kinetics parameters of MH onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Kinetic Model Kinetic Parameters (MH)
Pseudo-first-orderQe,exp
k1 (min−1)
Qe,cal (mg/g)
R2
977.03
0.70 × 10−4
845.62
0.643
Pseudo-second-orderk2 (g·min·mg−1)
Qe,cal (mg/g)
R2
0.00285
144.1
0.999
Table 5. The adsorption isotherm parameters of MH onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Table 5. The adsorption isotherm parameters of MH onto AC−Alg0.5U microbeads.
Isotherm Model Isotherm Parameters (MH)
LangmuirKL (L/min)
Qm (mg/g)
R2
0.00716
1694.2
0.984
FreundlichKF [(mg/g) (L/mg) (1/n)]
1/n
R2
16.15
0.815
0.980
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, Z.; Xue, Q.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z. A Keratin-Waste Derived Multifunctional Gel System: Reusable Activated Carbon/Alginate Microbeads for Simultaneous Dye and Pharmaceutical Adsorption. Gels 2026, 12, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12020158

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhao L, Li Z, Xue Q, Tang Z, Zhang G, Li Z, Wang Z. A Keratin-Waste Derived Multifunctional Gel System: Reusable Activated Carbon/Alginate Microbeads for Simultaneous Dye and Pharmaceutical Adsorption. Gels. 2026; 12(2):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12020158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yue, Lei Zhao, Zhiying Li, Qingqing Xue, Zhenhao Tang, Ge Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, and Zifan Wang. 2026. "A Keratin-Waste Derived Multifunctional Gel System: Reusable Activated Carbon/Alginate Microbeads for Simultaneous Dye and Pharmaceutical Adsorption" Gels 12, no. 2: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12020158

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Li, Z., Xue, Q., Tang, Z., Zhang, G., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026). A Keratin-Waste Derived Multifunctional Gel System: Reusable Activated Carbon/Alginate Microbeads for Simultaneous Dye and Pharmaceutical Adsorption. Gels, 12(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12020158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop