Next Article in Journal
Onychomycosis in Foot and Toe Malformations
Next Article in Special Issue
Broad-Spectrum Efficacy and Modes of Action of Two Bacillus Strains against Grapevine Black Rot and Downy Mildew
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Activitiy of Rezafungin in Comparison with Anidulafungin and Caspofungin against Invasive Fungal Isolates (2017 to 2022) in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional Analysis Revealing the Improvement of ε-Poly-L-lysine Production from Intracellular ROS Elevation after Botrytis cinerea Induction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine

Shandong Academy of Grape, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(6), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060398
Submission received: 17 April 2024 / Revised: 29 May 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 31 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol of Grapevine Diseases, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is one of the major economic fruit crops but suffers many diseases, causing damage to the quality of grapes. Strain G166 was isolated from the rhizosphere of grapevine and was found to exhibited broad-spectrum antagonistic activities against fungal pathogens on grapes in vitro, such as Coniella diplodiella, Botrytis cinerea, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that G166 contained a 6,613,582 bp circular chromosome with 5749 predicted coding DNA sequences and an average GC content of 60.57%. TYGS analysis revealed that G166 belongs to Pseudomonas viciae. Phenotype analysis indicated that P. viciae G166 remarkably reduced the severity of grape white rot disease in the grapevine. After inoculation with C. diplodiella, more H2O2 and MDA accumulated in the leaves and resulted in decreases in the Pn and chlorophyll content. Conversely, G166-treated grapevine displayed less oxidative damage with lower H2O2 levels and MDA contents under the pathogen treatments. Subsequently, G166-treated grapevine could sustain a normal Pn and chlorophyll content. Moreover, the application of P. viciae G166 inhibited the growth of mycelia on detached leaves and berries, while more disease symptoms occurred in non-bacterized leaves and berries. Therefore, P. viciae G166 served as a powerful bioagent against grape white rot disease. Using antiSMASH prediction and genome comparisons, a relationship between non-ribosomal peptide synthase clusters and antifungal activity was found in the genome of P. viciae G166. Taken together, P. viciae G166 shows promising antifungal potential to improve fruit quality and yield in ecological agriculture.
Keywords: grape white rot disease; comparative genome analysis; non-ribosomal lipopeptides; biocontrol agents (BCAs) grape white rot disease; comparative genome analysis; non-ribosomal lipopeptides; biocontrol agents (BCAs)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jing, X.; Su, L.; Yin, X.; Chen, Y.; Guan, X.; Yang, D.; Sun, Y. Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060398

AMA Style

Jing X, Su L, Yin X, Chen Y, Guan X, Yang D, Sun Y. Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(6):398. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jing, Xiaoshu, Ling Su, Xiangtian Yin, Yingchun Chen, Xueqiang Guan, Dongyue Yang, and Yuxia Sun. 2024. "Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 6: 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060398

APA Style

Jing, X., Su, L., Yin, X., Chen, Y., Guan, X., Yang, D., & Sun, Y. (2024). Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas viciae G166 Conferring Antifungal Activity in Grapevine. Journal of Fungi, 10(6), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop