Next Article in Journal
The Photodegradation of Lignin Methoxyl C Promotes Fungal Decomposition of Lignin Aromatic C Measured with 13C-CPMAS NMR
Previous Article in Journal
Evidencing New Roles for the Glycosyl-Transferase Cps1 in the Phytopathogenic Fungus Botrytis cinerea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy

1
Honghe Center for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Honghe 654400, China
2
Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3
East and Central Asia Regional Office, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kunming 650201, China
4
Centre for Mountain Futures (CMF), Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming 650201, China
5
Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
6
No. 128/1-J, Azad Housing Society, Curca, P.O. Box, Goa Velha 403108, India
7
Società per gli Studi Naturalistici della Romagna, C.P. 143, 48012 Bagnacavallo, RA, Italy
8
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
9
Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
10
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
11
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(9), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090898
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Fungal Diversity)

Abstract

:
The genus Alternaria is comprised of well-known plant pathogens causing various important diseases in plants, as well as being common allergens in animals and humans. Species of Alternaria can be found as saprobes associated with various dead plant materials. This research aims to enhance the taxonomy of saprobic species in the genus Alternaria found on grasses and herbaceous plants from Italy, based on multi-locus phylogenetic analyses of a concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset combined with morphological characteristics. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses demonstrated six novel species belonging to the genus Alternaria sect. Alternaria as: A. muriformispora sp. nov., A. obpyriconidia sp. nov., A. ovoidea sp. nov., A. pseudoinfectoria sp. nov., A. rostroconidia sp. nov. and A. torilis sp. nov. Detailed morphological descriptions, illustrations and an updated phylogenetic relationship of taxa in the genus Alternaria sect. Alternaria are provided herein.

1. Introduction

The genus Alternaria is classified in the family Pleosporaceae, order Pleosporales, class Dothideomycetes [1,2,3]. The genus contains over 700 species epithets [4], but approximately 378 species are accepted within 28 sections, of which less than 100 species have molecular data to clarify their phylogenetic affinities [1,2,3,5,6,7]. Species of Alternaria are well-known as serious plant pathogens and post-harvest pathogens, causing major crop losses, or can be the causative agents of animal and human pathogens, causing phaeohyphomycosis or acting as airborne allergens [8,9,10,11].
Alternaria is well-known as dematiaceous hyphomycetes which can be found everywhere. The genus is characterized by mononematous, macro- or micronematous, unbranched or branched conidiophores, integrated to discrete, mono- to polytretic conidiogenous cells, solitary or catenate, straight or curved, phragmo- or dictyoseptate, smooth or verrucose and median brown to dark brown conidia with rounded or narrowly-beaked tip. Alternaria occupies diverse ecological niches through its life modes, which range from endophytes to pathogens to saprobes on a wide range of host substrates (e.g., agricultural products, animals, plants, seeds, soil as well as the atmosphere) [2,8,10,11,12]. The genus has a cosmopolitan distribution, and is widely distributed in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America [13].
Lawrence et al. [14] introduced Alternaria sect. Alternaria to accommodate Alternaria species, commonly referred to small-spored Alternaria groups. The members of Alternaria sect. Alternaria can be morphologically distinguished from other sections in having small conidia produced in short chains (frequently less than 60 µm in length in vitro) [8,14,15]. However, this small-spored criterion is not significant to distinguish species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria from other Alternaria sections, when multi-locus phylogeny has become an essential tool to discriminate species in Alternaria [2]. According to Li et al. [2], some species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria have conidia larger than 60 µm, but these species were affiliated with Alternaria sect. Alternaria based on multi-locus phylogenetic evidence. The holomorph of sect. Alternaria is known for A. alternata, the generic type of the section, and the sexual morph is described as typically erumpent, small-sized, smooth, globose to ovoid, dark brown; with papillate ascomata; cylindrical to cylindric-clavate asci and muriform, ellipsoid to fusoid, brown, eguttulate, smooth-walled ascospores [2,10,16]. Woudenberg et al. [8] estimated 60 species accommodating in sect. Alternaria based on ITS gene analysis. Consequently, Woudenberg et al. [17] accepted only 11 species and one species complex in this section based on polyphasic taxonomic approaches, while 35 morphospecies were treated as synonyms of A. alternata. Later, Li et al. [2] showed that these 35 synonymized species can be divided into 5 main subclades in their analyses of A. alternata, pending questions on their conspecific status. Gannibal [15] re-circumscribed and amended the section based on morphological assessments by Simmons [18], and included the other 37 morphospecies and accepted 59 species in sect. Alternaria. Subsequently, the other four species (i.e., A. calystegiae, A. diversispora, A. guaranitica and A. macalpinei) were included in this section by Gannibal and Lawrence [19]. Alternaria doliconidium and A. italica were also included in this section by Wanasinghe et al. [20] and Jayawardena et al. [21] respectively. Nishikawa and Nakashima [22] also included A. iridicola in this section. Recently, Li et al. [2] introduced another 14 species in sect. Alternaria. Therefore, 83 species are currently accommodated in this section.
Recent molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that the identification of species in Alternaria and its close relative genera challenged their morphological basis [8,14,17,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In general, the molecular data tends to support the recent morphologically distinct sub-generic species groups [8,10,14,29]. However, the phylogenetic relationships of the Alternaria sections are normally variable, with the morphological characteristics used to identify morphospecies. On the other hand, Woudenberg et al. [8] delineate species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria based on ITS. The whole-genome sequencing has become an essential tool to delineate ambiguous species in Alternaria and other complex species by Woudenberg et al. [17]. Thus, Woudenberg et al. [17] used multi-locus phylogeny based on ITS, gapdh, rpb2, tef1-α, Alt-a1, endoPG and OPA10-2 gene loci coupled with whole-genome and transcriptome comparisons to discriminate species in sect. Alternaria, and accepted only 11 phylogenetic species and one species complex in Alternaria sect. Alternaria. Furthermore, Woudenberg et al. [17] synonymized 35 morphospecies under A. alternata. In addition, the lack of phylogenetic effective coding genes led to confusion in the identification of Alternaria species [8,10,17]; therefore, re-defining and expanding the generic concept of Alternaria sect. Alternaria and other Alternaria sections is necessary. These studies suggest that morphological characteristics typically used to delineate species (e.g., conidium length, width and septation; chain structure; and beak shape) may not reflect evolutionary relationships between taxa.
Alternaria species are major plant pathogens that infect a vast array of plant hosts [2,8,10,11,15,30]. Members in Alternaria sect. Alternaria are still confused in their delineation of species which are largely based on morphology and the clarity of their host species. The present study aims to introduce six novel species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria on different specific plant hosts based on a morpho-molecular approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Examination, Isolation, and Conservation

Samples were collected from dead branches, stems, and twigs of several plant hosts in Italy. The samples were dried and preserved in paper bags for further observation and examination under an Olympus SZ61 series stereo microscope. Micro-morphological features were mounted in sterilized distilled water on a clean slide for examination, and captured by a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera under a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope. The size of micro-morphological features was measured by using Tarosoft (R) Image FrameWork version 0.9.7. Photographic plates were edited and combined in Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The type specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand (MFLU).
Axenic cultures were obtained from single spore isolation using a spore suspension technique described by Senanayake et al. [31]. Germinated conidia were aseptically cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or malt extract agar (MEA) media under day/night lighting at room temperature (25–30 °C). The growth of fungal colonies and sporulation in cultures were observed after two weeks and eight weeks of incubation, respectively. The ex-type living cultures were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC). The novel species were registered in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/IndexFungorumRegister.htm, accessed on 15 July 2022).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Fungal genomic DNA were extracted from fresh mycelia growing on PDA/MEA for one month using the Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (BioFlux®, Hangzhou, China). The duplicated strain of each species was extracted DNA from fungal fruiting bodies using Forensic DNA Kit (Omega®, Norcross, GA, USA).
DNA fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with seven gene loci, including the internal transcribed spacers (ITS: ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) using primers ITS5 and ITS4 [32], the 28S large subunit rDNA (LSU) using primers LR0R and LR5 [33], the 18S small subunit rDNA (SSU) using primers NS1 and NS4 [32], the partial RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2) using primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR [34], the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) using primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R [35], Alternaria major allergen (Alt-a1) using primers ALT-F and ALT-R [25] and Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate Dehydrogenase (gapdh) using primers GDP-1 and GDP-2 [36]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a Veriti™ 96-Well Fast Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystem, California, USA) following the protocol described in Li et al. [2]. All PCR products were sent to TsingKe Biological Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China for purification and sequencing. The quality of the sanger DNA sequences and sequence consensus from forward and reward directions was checked and assembled manually in BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [37], and the newly nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses

The newly generated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 sequences were subjected to the nucleotide BLAST search engine via the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 10 April 2022) for checking potential contaminants or erroneous sequences as well as delineating the closely related taxa. All reference sequences were downloaded from GenBank. The multiple sequence matrixes were automatically aligned by MAFFT v. 7.452 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/, accessed on 20 May 2022) [38]. Manual improvements were made where necessary in BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [37]. Individual gene alignments were separately analyzed by maximum likelihood (ML) in order to check the congruence of tree topology, and, thus, the combined multi-locus phylogenetic trees were inferred based on Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses.
Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed by Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) [39,40] implemented in raxmlGUI 1.3 [41] using the default setting, but adjusted with 1000 bootstrap replicates and a GAMMAI model of nucleotide substitution. MrModeltest v. 2.3 [42] was used to determine the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution for each locus and incorporated into the analyses. GTR+I+G was the best-fit model for ITS, LSU and Alt-a1 loci under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), while TIM2+I+G was the best-fit model for SSU and rpb2, SYM+I+G was the best-fit model for gapdh and TIM1+I+G was the best-fit model for tef1-α. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed by MrBayes v.3.1.2 [43]. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) of six simultaneous Markov chains was run with one million generations to determine posterior probabilities (PP) [44,45], and started from a random tree topology. Trees were frequently sampled at 100th generation and the temperature value of heated chain was set to 0.15. The extra runs were required when the average standard deviation of split frequencies did not lower than 0.01 after one million generation. The first 25% trees represented the burn-in phase of the analyses and were discarded. The remaining trees were used for calculating posterior probabilities (PP) in the majority rule consensus tree. The phylogram were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.0 [46] and edited in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2016 (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

Six new species collected from dead herbaceous and monocotyledonous plants in Italy were analyzed with other representative Alternaria species in sect. Alternaria including Alternaria muriformispora (strain MFLUCC 22-0073; on Plantago sp.), A. obpyriconidia (strains MFLUCC 21-0121 and MFLUCC 14-0435; on Vicia faba), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427; on Dactylis glomerata), A. pseudoinfectoria (MFLUCC 21-0126; on Chenopodium sp.), A. rostroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0136; on Arabis sp.) and A. torilis (MFLUCC 14-0433 and MFLUCC 21-0133; on Torilis arvensis). The analyses represented phylogenetic relationships of taxa in Alternaria sect. Alternaria as well as the placement of six new species. Phylogenetic construction of sect. Alternaria based on a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset comprises 96 sequences of 34 representative species in sect. Alternaria, and Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392) was selected as the outgroup taxon. The best scoring RAxML tree is shown in Figure 1 with the final ML optimization likelihood value of -11313.333238 (ln). The dataset consists of 4377 total characters, including gaps (ITS: 1–514 bp, LSU: 515–1368 bp, SSU: 1369–2295 bp, tef1-α: 2296–2540 bp, rpb2: 2541–3311 bp, gapdh: 3312–3897 bp, Alt-a1: 3898–4377 bp). RAxML analysis yielded 511 distinct alignment patterns and 8.3% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.246733, C = 0.254032, G = 0.258489, T = 0.240746, with substitution rates AC = 0.896323, AG = 2.073824, AT = 1.043150, CG = 0.820017, CT = 4.179461 and GT = 1.000000. The gamma distribution shape parameter alpha = 0.020013 and the Tree-Length = 0.230674. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) from MCMC were evaluated with a final average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.008527.
Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses based on ML and BI criteria showed overall similarity in tree topologies. Alternaria muriformispora (MFLUCC 22-0073, MFLU 21-0309) has a close phylogenetic relationship with A. pseudoinfectoria (MFLUCC 21-0126, MFLU 21-0311) (76% ML, 0.98 PP; Figure 1) and also clustered with A. lathyri (MFLUCC 21-0140, MFLU 21-0297) and A. breviconidiophora (MFLUCC 22-0075, MFLU 21-0317). These four species formed a well-resolved subclade in sect. Alternaria with 97% ML and 0.98 PP support. Alternaria obpyriconidia (MFLUCC 21-0121, MFLU 21-0300) formed a clade with A. macroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0134), A. arctoseptata (MFLUCC 21-0139), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427), A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124) and A. falcata (MFLUCC 21-0123) with 93% ML and 1.00 PP support (Figure 1). While A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427) is sister to A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124) with significant support (70% ML, 0.95 PP), and is also constituted in this clade. Alternaria rostroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0136, MFLU 21-0318) formed a separated branch with A. minimispora (MFLUCC 21-0127) with significant support in BI analysis (0.96 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria torilis (MFLUCC 14-0433, MFLUCC 21-0133, MFLU 21-0299) formed an independent subclade, related to A. ellipsoidialis (MFLUCC 21-0132) and A. eupatoriicola (MFLUCC 21-0122).

3.2. Taxonomy

Alternaria muriformispora J.F. Li, Camporesi, Phookamsak & Bhat, sp. nov. Figure 2
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559795
  • Etymology: Named after its muriform conidia.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0309
Saprobic on dead aerial stems of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on the substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown hyphae. Conidiophores 185–201 × 12–13 µm ( x = 192 × 12 µm, n = 30), macronematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, with swollen at the basal cell, slightly narrower towards the apex, dark brown, paler at the apex, smooth, septate, unbranched, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 4–5 × 5–7 µm ( x = 4.5 × 6.2 µm, n = 20), polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline to light brown, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform with one conidiogenous locus. Conidia 75–88 × 23–35 µm ( x = 83 × 29 µm, n = 30), acrogenous, solitary, dry, simple, straight, curved, ellipsoidal to ovoid, or obpyriform with short, narrow, paler brown, aseptate, unbranched, obtuse beak, copper brown to dark brown, four to seven transverse eusepta, with 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa in all middle transverse divisions, without oblique or longitudinal septa at both end cells, slightly thickened and constricted at middle septa, borne in chain, verruculose to verrucose, thin-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies hairy or cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, brown to dark brown hyphae; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Meldola, on dead aerial stems of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae), 8 September 2014, E. Camporesi, IT2101 (MFLU 21-0309, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 22-0073.
Notes: Multi-locus phylogeny showed that two strains of Alternaria muriformispora formed a robust clade (100% ML, 1.00 PP; Figure 1) sister to A. pseudoinfectoria with moderate support (76% ML, 0.98 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in having larger (83 × 29 µm vs. 33 × 19 µm), ovoid to ellipsoidal, or obpyriform, short beak and copper brown to dark brown conidia, with 4–7 transverse eusepta and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa in all middle transverse divisions. Alternaria pseudoinfectoria has subglobose to obclavate, or obpyriform, light brown conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa and conidia that form long, cylindrical, septate, unbranched secondary conidiophores with one apical conidiogenous locus. A nucleotide pairwise comparison of rpb2 sequences showed that A. muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in 10/559 bp (1.8% difference, no gap). In Alt-a1, A. muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in 9/474 bp (1.9% difference, no gap).
Alternaria obpyriconidia J.F. Li, Camporesi, Phookamsak & Bhat, sp. nov. Figure 3
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559797
  • Etymology: Named after its obpyriform conidia.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0300
Saprobic on dead stems of Vicia faba (Fabaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on the substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, subhyaline to pale white hyphae. Conidiophores (130–)139.5–155 × 11.5–13 µm ( x = 145.8 × 12.6 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, slightly swollen at the apical cell, copper brown to dark brown, septate, unbranched, smooth and thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 19–23 × 9–12.5 µm ( x = 19.7 × 10.8 µm, n = 100), polytretic, sympodial, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical to doliiform, subhyaline, smooth, thick-walled, apically rounded or doliiform, with 2–4 conidiogenous loci. Conidia (58–)62.5–68(–69) × (12.5–)22.5–28(–30) µm ( x = 64 × 25.4 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, dry, simple, straight or curved, ellipsoidal to obclavate or obpyriform, with short, narrow, pale brown, aseptate, rostrate at beak, pale brown to greyish brown, three to four transverse eusepta, with 1–2 longitudinal to oblique or Y-shaped septa in the middle cells, constricted at the central septum, borne in chain, verruculose or verrucose and thin-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies hairy or cottony, pale to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, subhyaline to brown hyphae; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Bagno di Romagna, Valgianna, on dead aerial stems of Vicia faba (Fabaceae), 29 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1688 (MFLU 21-0300, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 21-0121; ibid., MFLUCC 14-0435.
Notes: In the multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, two strains of Alternaria obpyriconidia formed a separate branch basal to A. macroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0134), A. arctoseptata (MFLUCC 21-0139), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427) and A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124), and also clustered with A. falcata (MFLUCC 21-0123). Alternaria obpyriconidia differs from A. macroconidia in having smaller (58–69 × 12.5–30 µm vs. 68.5–95.5 × 20–30.5), pale brown to greyish brown conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta, while A. macroconidia has olivaceous brown to golden brown or brown conidia, with 3–5 transverse disto- or eusepta and conidia that are not constricted in A. macroconidia [2]. Alternaria arctoseptata is distinct from A. obpyriconidia in having larger (15–75 × 10–35 µm), yellowish-brown to dark brown, sectored conidia, varied in shape, with 2–3(–6) transverse septa. Conidiophores of A. arctoseptata are shorter (50–100 × 8–12 µm vs. (130–)139.5–155 × 11.5–13 µm) and pale brown to light brown, arising from a stomatic base [2], while A. obpyriconidia has copper brown to dark brown conidiophores. Alternaria ovoidea can be distinguished from A. obpyriconidia in having slightly smaller (48–65 × 15.5–30 µm), ovoid, orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, non-beak conidia with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, whereas A. obpyriconidia has short, narrow, pale brown, aseptate, rostrate beak conidia. Alternaria baoshanensis can be distinguished from A. obpyriconidia in having versicolorous, light brown to dark brown conidiophores, which sometimes branch with several aggregated at the base, and light brown to yellowish brown 3–6 transverse septa conidia [2], whereas A. obpyriconidia has unbranched conidiophores. Alternaria falcata differs from A. obpyriconidia in having smaller (20–50 × 12–23 µm), olivaceous-brown to brown conidia, with 2–5 transverse disto- or eusepta [2]. A nucleotide base comparison of these species is shown in Table 2.
Alternaria ovoidea J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 4
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559798
  • Etymology: Referring to its ovoid (droplets-like) conidia.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0298
Saprobic on stems of Dactylis glomerata (Poaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium partly superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, pale brown hyphae. Conidiophores 270–300 × 6.5–11 µm ( x = 280 × 8 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, copper brown to dark brown, erect, flexuous or sigmoid, cylindrical, septate, branched, smooth to verrucose, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 9–13 × 8.5–15 µm ( x = 9.7 × 11.4 µm, n = 100), mono- to polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, subcylindrical, pale brown to light brown, smooth, thick-walled, apically doliiform with conidiogenous loci cicatrized on conidial secession. Conidia 48–65 × 15.5–30 µm ( x = 55.4 × 27.2 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, ovoid, orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, and one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in transverse divisions, verruculose, thick-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striated, with irregular edge; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Fiumicello di Premilcuore, on dead aerial stems of Dactylis glomerata (Poaceae), 19 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1656 (MFLU 21-0298, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 14-0427.
Notes: Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses showed that Alternaria ovoidea is sister to A. baoshanensis with significant support (70% ML, 0.95 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria ovoidea differs from A. baoshanensis in having solitary, flexuous or sigmoid, copper brown to dark brown conidiophores with a non-stomatic base, while the conidiophores are versicolorous, light brown to dark brown, arising from a stomatic base in A. baoshanensis. Conidia of A. ovoidea are slightly larger (48–65 × 15.5–30 µm vs. 25–60 × 12–22 µm), orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, while A. baoshanensis has light brown to yellowish brown, sometimes with a short beak, varied in shape, usually subglobose to ellipsoidal, or subcylindrical to obpyriform, 3–6 transverse septa conidia [2]. A nucleotide base comparison of A. ovoidea with A. baoshanensis showed that they are different in 4/515 bp (0.8%) of ITS, 11/474 bp (2.3%) of Alt-a1, 11/567 bp (1.9%) of gapdh, 37/559 bp (6.6%) of rpb2 and 3/238 bp (1.3%) of tef1-α.
Alternaria pseudoinfectoria J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 5
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559799
  • Etymology: Referring to the conidial structures resemble Alternaria section infectoriae.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0311
Saprobic on stems of Chenopodium sp. (Chenopodiaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown hyphae. Conidiophores 55–68 × 12–14 µm ( x = 62 × 13 µm, n = 30), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, light brown to brown, septate, branched, smooth, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 11–12 × 10–14 µm ( x = 11.5 × 12 µm, n = 20), monotretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline to light brown, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform with one conidiogenous locus. Conidia 25–40 × 13–25 µm ( x = 33 × 19 µm, n = 30) acrogenous, holoblastic, solitary, straight, subglobose to obclavate, or obpyriform, sometimes with short, narrow, rostrate, paler brown, septate beak, light brown 3–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in some transverse divisions, borne in chain, smooth to minutely verrucose, thin-walled, formed apically secondary conidiophores, with one conidiogenous locus. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies immersed in PDA, cottony, white to grey, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, white hyphae; conidia not sporulated in vitro within 60 days.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Forlì, Via Nenni, on dead aerial stems of Chenopodium sp. (Chenopodiaceae), 17 October 2014, E. Camporesi, IT2181 (MFLU 21-0311, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 21-0126.
Notes: Alternaria pseudoinfectoria resembles species in sect. Infectoriae due to its conidia often developing long secondary conidiophores. Although species in section Panax also formed long secondary conidiophores, conidiogenous loci on secondary conidiophores are rather monotretic in A. pseudoinfectoria, which more resemble structures of species in sect. Infectoriae [14,47]. However, A. pseudoinfectoria corresponds with sect. Alternaria in having straight or curved primary conidiophores, simple to branched, with one apical conidiogenous locus, and conidia born in chain [8]. In phylogenetic analyses, two strains of A. pseudoinfectoria formed a well-resolved subclade (82% ML, 0.99 PP) and is sister to A. muriformispora with 76% ML and 0.98 PP support (Figure 1). The morphological comparison of these two species is detailed in notes of A. muriformispora.
Alternaria rostroconidia J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 6
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559800
  • Etymology: Referring to the rostrate conidia.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0318
Saprobic on dead stems of Arabis sp. (Brassicaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, with dark hyphae. Conidiophores 105–120 × 11–15 µm ( x = 112 × 13 µm, n = 30), macronematous, solitary or 2–5 aggregated at the base, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, light brown to dark brown, septate, geniculate, smooth or sometimes semi-verrucose, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 12–18 × 5–8 µm ( x = 15 × 6 µm, n = 20), mono- to polytretic, normally sympodial proliferations, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline or semi-colored, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform, with 1–2 conidiogenous loci and swollen knots near conidiogenous loci. Conidia 50–80 × 25–30 µm ( x = 66 × 22 µm, n = 30) acrogenous, solitary, straight or curved, ellipsoidal or ovoid to obpyriform, with short, narrow, rostrate, paler brown, aseptate beak, with distinct hilum at the apex, dark brown, 3–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in some transverse divisions, sometimes sectored, slightly constricted at the septa, borne in chain, smooth, thick-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 10 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, white to grey hyphae; conidia not sporulated in vitro within 60 days.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Premilcuore, on dead aerial stems of Arabis sp. (Brassicaceae), 8 October 2017, E. Camporesi, IT3515 (MFLU 21-0318, holotype), ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 21-0136.
Notes: Alternaria rostroconidia corresponds with species in sect. Alternaria in having obpyriform, born in chain conidia with several transverse and longitudinal septa [8]. In multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, A. rostroconidia has a close relationship with A. minimispora with significant support in BI analyses (0.96 PP; Figure 1). A rpb2 nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 19/505 bp (3.8% difference, no gap). In gapdh, A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 10/545 bp (1.8% difference, no gap). The Alt-a1 nucleotide pairwise comparison shows that A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 8/474 bp (1.7% difference, no gap). Morphologically, A. rostroconidia can be distinguished from A. minimispora in having larger (50–80 × 25–30 µm vs. 13–25 × 8–11 µm), ellipsoidal or ovoid to obpyriform conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta and short, narrow, rostrate and distinct hilum at the apex. Alternaria minimispora has subglobose to ovoid, sometimes obpyriform or obturbinate, beakless, two to four transversely euseptate conidia [2].
Alternaria torilis J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 7
  • Index Fungorum number: IF 559801
  • Etymology: Named after the host genus “Torilis”.
  • Holotype: MFLU 21-0299
Saprobic on dead aerial stems of Torilis arvensis (Apiaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown to light brown hyphae. Conidiophores (155–)177–185(–191) × (7.5–)8–10(–11) µm ( x = 175.2 × 8.8 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, dark brown, unbranched, septate, sometimes branched, smooth, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 7–9(–10) × (6.5–)7.5–10 µm ( x = 8.2 × 8.9 µm, n = 100), mono- to polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform, with 2 conidiogenous loci cicatrized on conidial secession. Conidia (55–)60–75(–82) × (23–)25–31.5(–32) µm ( x = 68.5 × 28.5 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, dry, straight, fusiform to ovoid, or obturbinate to obpyriform, sometimes with short, narrow, pale brown to light brown, aseptate beak, brown to dark brown, 2–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped distoseptum in some transverse divisions, borne in chain, minutely verruculose, thin-walled, formed apically secondary conidiophores with one conidiogenous locus. Conidial secession schizolytic.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies growing on PDA, hairy or cottony, light brown to brown, reaching 5 cm in 14 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, colorless hyphae. Conidia sporulated on OA within 15 days, phragmosporous to muriform, oblong to ovoid, brown to dark brown, with short, doliiform, apical beak, formed apically or laterally, short, branched or unbranched secondary conidiophores with one to two conidiogenous loci at apex and 1–3 transverse septa, with 1–2 longtudinal or Y-shape septa in transverse division, smooth to minutely verrucose and thin-walled.
Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Forlì, San Lorenzo in Noceto, on dead aerial stems of Torilis arvensis (Apiaceae), 23 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1667 (MFLU 21-0299, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 14-0433, ibid., MFLUCC 21-0133.
Notes: Alternaria torilis resembles A. alternata in having a brown to dark brown short beak, 2–4 transverse septa conidia and forming secondary conidiophores. The conidial body can narrow gradually into a tapered beak or secondary conidiophore, with curved primary conidiophores and solitary conidiophores with mono- to polytretic conidiophores with conidiogenous loci at the apex. Alternaria torilis differs from A. alternata by its darker, ovoid to obturbinate or obpyriform, which is rather ovoid to chiefly obclavate or obpyriform in A. alternata. Conidiophores of A. torilis normally have 2 conidiogenous loci and are rostrate at the apex. In the phylogenetic analyses, three strains of A. torilis formed a well-resolved subclade (85% Ml, 1.00 PP; Figure 1), independently constituted within sect. Alternaria, and have a close relationship with A. ellipsoidialis and A. eupatoriicola distancing from A. alternata. Alternaria torilis can be distinguished from A. ellipsoidialis in having larger (55–82 × 23–32 µm vs. 35–60 × 18–25 µm), fusiform to ovoid, or obturbinate to obpyriform, brown to dark brown conidia, with 2–4 transverse eusepta. Alternaria ellipsoidialis has oblong to ellipsoidal, or ovoid, pale brown to brown, sectored, 4–7 transverse eusepta conidia [2]. Alternaria eupatoriicola is different from A. torilis in having smaller (40–65 × 15–30 µm vs. 55–82 × 23–32), ovoid to obpyriform, reddish brown to brown, 3–5transverse septa conidia. In addition, conidia of A. torilis formed apically secondary conidiophores with one conidiogenous locus, whereas it was absent in A. eupatoriicola [2].
The nucleotide pairwise comparison of the ITS showed that Alternaria torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 9/485 bp (1.9% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 10/485 bp (2.1% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 9/480 bp (1.9% difference, no gap). A rpb2 nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 42/558 bp (7.5% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 9/480 bp (1.9% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 40/558 bp (7.2% difference, no gap). A gapdh nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 31/590 bp (5.3% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 18/560 bp (3.2% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 25/590 bp (4.2% difference, no gap). The nucleotide pairwise comparison of the Alt-a1 showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 25/465 bp (5.4% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 20/465 bp (4.3% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 15/470 bp (3.2% difference, no gap).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The aim of the present study was to introduce six novel Alternaria species in sect. Alternaria based on a morpho-molecular approach. These six saprobic species occurred on a variety of host plants in families Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Fabaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Poaceae in Italy and could not be ascribed to any known taxa within sect. Alternaria. According to a recent classification provided by Woudenberg et al. [17] and Gannibal [15], we also note the morphological differences among extant species in this section. Hence, six new species: A. muriformispora, A. obpyriconidia, A. ovoidea, A. pseudoinfectoria, A. rostroconidia and A. torilis are introduced, described and illustrated herein.
Multi-locus phylogeny, based on a concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence matrix, revealed that these novel species formed well-resolved subclades within the sect. Alternaria, except for A. obpyriconidia that formed a distinct branch with other closely related species with low support in ML, but well-resolved species in BI analysis (1.00 PP; Figure 1). Based on the phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics, coupled with host preferences and nucleotide polymorphisms, A. obpyriconidia is justified as a new species following Jeewon and Hyde [48]. Furthermore, these six new species are distant from A. arborescens species complex (AASC) and A. alternata as well as other species in this section, which provided further evidence to support their phylogenetic affinities within the sect. Alternaria.
In the present analyses, Alternaria doliconidium and A. italica formed subclades, constituted within A. alternata, and that concurred with Li et al. [2]. Even though Woudenberg et al. [17] accepted only 11 phylogenetic species and one species complex in sect. Alternaria, and also treated 35 morphospecies as synonyms of A. alternata, Li et al. [2] re-analyzed the isolates of A. alternata with their new collections and mentioned that A. alternata could be separated to be at least five distinct species. However, more evidence is needed to support this conclusion. Similarly, A. doliconidium and A. italica lack informative cording genes such as Alt-a1, gapdh, rpb2 and tef1-α to justify their heterospecific status, with A. alternata pending further studies.
Woudenberg et al. [17] indicated that Alternaria species, including Alternaria sect. Alternaria, should be delineated by using phylogenomics due to a lack of effective gene sequences; however, the multi-locus phylogenetic analyses could well delineate species in sect. Alternaria (Figure 1) in studies of Wanasinghe et al. [20], Jayawardena et al. [21], Nishikawa and Nakashima [22] and Li et al. [2]. In the present study, phylogenetically analyzed taxa in sect. Alternaria, based on combined the intervening ITS regions, nuclear ribosomal DNA SSU, LSU and protein-coding genes Alt-a1, tef1-α, gapdh and rpb2, demonstrated that the recent taxa in this section formed distinct clades and were well supported in the phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide polymorphic comparisons also show the differences between our new taxa, which support the justifications of the new species described herein. It is interesting to note that in the nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of gene sequences among the species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria, rpb2 contains the most nucleotide differences among the species (up to 3.5%), which implies that this protein-cording gene may be a potentially effective gene region to delineate species in sect. Alternaria.
Nevertheless, species of Alternaria in sect. Alternaria are similar in morphological characteristics, and it is difficult to distinguish these species based solely on morphology. However, the conidial characteristics (e.g., conidial septation and rostrate or non-beak conidia) of our six novel species are significant to distinguish them from other species. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses also provided further evidence, confirming that these six species are novel. These six species clearly formed a separate branch with significant support values (≥70% ML and 0.95 PP; Figure 1) in the present study, and this concurs with the findings of Li et al. [2]. Jeewon and Hyde [48] suggested that the nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of reliable genes should be more than 1.5% different for justifying the novel species. Even though the ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α could not be used to delineate some species in sect. Alternaria, the remaining gene regions (i.e., Alt-a1, gapdh and rpb2) proved sufficient for distinguishing these new species. Therefore, the novel species introduced herein were justified based on the multi-locus phylogeny coupled with morphological characteristics and nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of reliable genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and R.P.; methodology, J.L. and R.P.; software, J.L. and H.J.; validation, R.P., J.L. and D.J.B.; formal analysis, J.L, S.H. and H.J.; investigation, J.L and R.P.; resources, J.L. and E.C.; data curation, J.L., E.C. and R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L., H.J. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, J.L., R.P., D.J.B., N.S., J.K., S.H. and P.E.M.; supervision, N.S., S.L. and J.X.; project administration, R.P. and N.S.; funding acquisition, N.S., S.L. and J.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research study is supported by Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department, Key Project (Grant No. 202101AS070045) and the NSFC-CGIAR Project “Characterization of roots and their associated rhizosphere microbes in agroforestry systems: ecological restoration in high-phosphorus environment” (Grant No. 31861143002). The APC was supported by Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data availability was mentioned in the manuscript. The novel taxa were registered in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp, accessed on 15 July 2022) including Index Fungorum numbers IF 559795, IF 559797, IF 559798, IF 559799, IF 559800 and IF 559801. The newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/submit/, accessed on 25 July 2021) and the GenBank accession numbers were shown in Table 1.

Acknowledgments

The Biology Experimental Center, Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences is thanked for providing the facilities of the molecular laboratory. Shaun Pennycook at Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, New Zealand, is thanked for assistance in naming the novel taxa. Er-Fu Yang at Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, China is thanked for molecular works. Junfu Li thanks Mae Fah Luang University for his Ph.D. scholarship. Rungtiwa Phookamsak thanks Reinventing University System 2021, Mae Fah Luang University for providing a visiting scholarship. Hongbo Jiang would like to thank Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand for his Ph.D. scholarship. Chiang Mai University, Thailand is thanked for partial research financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Sarma, V.V.; Boonmee, S.; Lücking, R.; Bhat, J.D.; Liu, N.; et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1553–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, J.-F.; Jiang, H.-B.; Jeewon, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Bhat, D.J.; Tang, S.-M.; Lumyong, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.-C.; Camporesi, E.; et al. Alternaria: Update on species limits, evolution, multi-locus phylogeny, and classification. Stud. Fungi, 2022; under review. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Saxena, R.K.; Erdoğdu, M.; Selçuk, F.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Aptroot, A.; et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa–2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Species Fungorum. Available online: http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  5. Ahmadpour, A.; Ghosta, Y.; Poursafar, A. Novel species of Alternaria section Nimbya from Iran as revealed by morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 2021, 113, 1073–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. He, L.; Cheng, H.; Htun, A.A.; Ge, H.; Xia, Z.Z.; Guo, J.W.; Deng, J.X.; Du, T. Phylogeny and taxonomy of two new Alternaria (Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) species in section Gypsophilae from China. Mycol. Prog. 2021, 20, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, L.; Htun, A.A.; Yu, Z.H.; Deng, J.-X.; Qi, L.-L. Morphological and molecular identification of two new Alternaria species (Ascomycota, Pleosporaceae) in section Radicina from China. MycoKeys 2021, 78, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Binder, M.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 171–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Truter, M.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Large-spored Alternaria pathogens in section Porri disentangled. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lawrence, D.P.; Rotondo, F.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity and taxonomy of the pleomorphic genus Alternaria. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jayawardena, R.S.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Ghobad-Nejhad, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Liu, N.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Oliveira-Filho, J.R.C.; da Silva, G.A.; Gibertoni, T.B.; et al. One stop shop II: Taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 26–50. Fungal Divers. 2019, 94, 41–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thomma, B.P. Alternaria spp.: From general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Farr, D.F.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungal databases, US National Fungal Collections, ARS USDA. Available online: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases (accessed on 21 May 2022).
  14. Lawrence, D.P.; Gannibal, P.B.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. The sections of Alternaria: Formalizing species-group concepts. Mycologia 2013, 105, 530–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gannibal, P.B. Distribution of Alternaria species among sections. 2. Section Alternaria. Mycotaxon 2016, 130, 941–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ariyawansa, H.; Thambugala, K.M.; Manamgoda, D.S.; Jayawardena, R.; Camporesi, E.; Boonmee, S.; Wanasinghe, D.; Phookamsak, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Singtripop, C.; et al. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Pleosporaceae. Fungal Divers. 2015, 71, 85–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Seidl, M.F.; Groenewald, J.Z.; de Vries, M.; Stielow, J.B.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formae speciales or pathotypes? Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual; CBS Biodiversity Series Volume: 6; Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; 780p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gannibal, P.B.; Lawrence, D.P. Distribution of Alternaria species among sections. 5. Species producing conidia with many longitudinal septa. Mycotaxon 2018, 133, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wanasinghe, D.N.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Lee, H.B.; Jones, E.B.G.; Tibpromma, S.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Jayasiri, S.C.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 709–839: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018, 89, 1–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jayawardena, R.S.; Purahong, W.; Zhang, W.; Wubet, T.; Li, X.; Liu, M.; Zhao, W.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, J.; Yan, J. Biodiversity of fungi on Vitis vinifera L. revealed by traditional and high-resolution culture-independent approaches. Fungal Divers. 2018, 90, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nishikawa, J.; Nakashima, C. Japanese species of Alternaria and their species boundaries based on host range. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2020, 5, 197–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pryor, B.M.; Gilbertson, R.L. Molecular phylogenetic relationships amongst Alternaria species and related fungi based upon analysis of nuclear ITS and mt SSU rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Peever, T.L.; Su, G.; Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Timmer, L.W. Molecular systematics of citrus-associated Alternaria species. Mycologia 2004, 96, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hong, S.G.; Cramer, R.A.; Lawrence, C.B.; Pryor, B.M. Alt a 1 allergen homologs from Alternaria and related taxa: Analysis of phylogenetic content and secondary structure. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Andrew, M.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. An expanded multi-locus phylogeny does not resolve species among the small-spored Alternaria species complex. Mycologia 2009, 101, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Armitage, A.D.; Barbara, D.J.; Harrison, R.J.; Lane, C.R.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Woodhall, J.W.; Clarkson, J.P. Discrete lineages within Alternaria alternata species group: Identification using new highly variable loci and support from morphological characters. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 994–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Armitage, A.D.; Cockerton, H.M.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Woodhall, J.; Lane, C.R.; Harrison, R.J.; Clarkson, J.P. Genomics evolutionary history and diagnostics of the Alternaria alternata species group including apple and Asian pear pathotypes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ghafri, A.A.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Al-Saady, N.A.; Al-Sadi, A.M. A new section and a new species of Alternaria from Oman. Phytotaxa 2019, 405, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Runa, F.; Park, M.S.; Pryor, B.M. Ulocladium systematics revisited: Phylogeny and taxonomic status. Mycol. Prog. 2009, 8, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dis-sanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2678–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berbee, M.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 1999, 91, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  38. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. Mafft online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Silvestro, D.; Michalak, I. raxmlGUI: A graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 2012, 12, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nylander, J.A.A. MrModeltest 2.0. Program Distributed by the Author; Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rannala, B.; Yang, Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 43, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhaxybayeva, O.; Gogarten, J.P. Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: Exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genom. 2002, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Rambaut, A. FigTree. Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 1.4.0; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Scotland, UK, 2012; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  47. Pryor, B.; Michailides, T.J. Morphological, pathogenic, and molecular characterization of Alternaria isolates associated with Alternaria late blight of pistachio. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria sect. Alternaria generated by RAxML-based analysis of a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, black) equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, red) equal to or greater than 0.95 PP are shown above the nodes. The tree is rooted to Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392). Newly species and generated strains are in blue, and the type strains are indicated in bold. Strains obtained from ex-type living culture are indicated by (T) and strains obtained from holotype specimen are indicated by (H).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria sect. Alternaria generated by RAxML-based analysis of a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, black) equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, red) equal to or greater than 0.95 PP are shown above the nodes. The tree is rooted to Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392). Newly species and generated strains are in blue, and the type strains are indicated in bold. Strains obtained from ex-type living culture are indicated by (T) and strains obtained from holotype specimen are indicated by (H).
Jof 08 00898 g001aJof 08 00898 g001b
Figure 2. Alternaria muriformispora (MFLU 21-0309, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead aerial stem of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae); (bf) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (gp) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 100 µm, (bf) = 50 µm, (g,jp) = 30 µm, (h,i) = 20 µm.
Figure 2. Alternaria muriformispora (MFLU 21-0309, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead aerial stem of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae); (bf) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (gp) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 100 µm, (bf) = 50 µm, (g,jp) = 30 µm, (h,i) = 20 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g002
Figure 3. Alternaria obpyriconidia (MFLU 21-0300, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Vicia faba; (bd) Conidiophores; (eh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (ir) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1000 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (bd,fh,nq) = 30 µm, (im,r) = 20 µm.
Figure 3. Alternaria obpyriconidia (MFLU 21-0300, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Vicia faba; (bd) Conidiophores; (eh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (ir) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1000 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (bd,fh,nq) = 30 µm, (im,r) = 20 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g003
Figure 4. Alternaria ovoidea (MFLU 21-0298, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Dactylis glomerata; (bh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (iq) Conidia; (r) Culture on PDA. Scale bars: (r) = 2 cm, (a) = 100 µm, (bd,g) = 50 µm, (e,f,h) = 30 µm, (iq) = 20 µm.
Figure 4. Alternaria ovoidea (MFLU 21-0298, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Dactylis glomerata; (bh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (iq) Conidia; (r) Culture on PDA. Scale bars: (r) = 2 cm, (a) = 100 µm, (bd,g) = 50 µm, (e,f,h) = 30 µm, (iq) = 20 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g004
Figure 5. Alternaria pseudoinfectoria (MFLU 21-0311, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Chenopodium sp.; (b,c,j) Conidia formed apical secondary conidiophores; (di) Conidiophores; (km) Conidia; (n) Germinated conidium; (o,p) Colonies on PDA. Scale bars: (o,p) = 2 cm, (a) = 300 µm, (bf,h,n) = 20 µm, (g,i,j) = 15 µm, (km) = 10 µm.
Figure 5. Alternaria pseudoinfectoria (MFLU 21-0311, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Chenopodium sp.; (b,c,j) Conidia formed apical secondary conidiophores; (di) Conidiophores; (km) Conidia; (n) Germinated conidium; (o,p) Colonies on PDA. Scale bars: (o,p) = 2 cm, (a) = 300 µm, (bf,h,n) = 20 µm, (g,i,j) = 15 µm, (km) = 10 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g005
Figure 6. Alternaria rostroconidia (MFLU 21-0318, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Arabis sp; (bf) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells (gm) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (b,d,f) = 30 µm, (c,gm) = 20 µm.
Figure 6. Alternaria rostroconidia (MFLU 21-0318, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Arabis sp; (bf) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells (gm) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (b,d,f) = 30 µm, (c,gm) = 20 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g006
Figure 7. Alternaria torilis (MFLU 21-0299, holotype). (a) Colonies on stems of Torilis arvensis; (bh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (i) Secondary conidiophores arising from conidium; (jq) Conidia; (r,s) Germinated conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (c,g) = 30 µm, (b,df,hs) = 20 µm.
Figure 7. Alternaria torilis (MFLU 21-0299, holotype). (a) Colonies on stems of Torilis arvensis; (bh) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (i) Secondary conidiophores arising from conidium; (jq) Conidia; (r,s) Germinated conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (c,g) = 30 µm, (b,df,hs) = 20 µm.
Jof 08 00898 g007
Table 1. Taxa used for the phylogenetic analyses in this study and their GenBank accession numbers. The ex-type cultures are indicated with superscript “T” and the newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.
Table 1. Taxa used for the phylogenetic analyses in this study and their GenBank accession numbers. The ex-type cultures are indicated with superscript “T” and the newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.
Species NameStrains/Voucher No.GenBank Accession Numbers
SSULSUrpb2ITSgapdhtef1-αAlt-a1
Alternaria alstroemeriaeCBS 118808KP124917KP124447KP124764KP124296KP124153KP125071KP123845
Alternaria alstroemeriaeCBS 118809 TNG063029NG069882KP124765NR163686KP124154KP125072MH084526
Alternaria alternantheraeCBS 124392KC584506KC584251KC584374KC584179KC584096KC584633KP123846
Alternaria alternataCBS 102596KP124950MH874392KP124796MH862796KP124183KP125104KP123877
Alternaria alternataCBS 102599KP124952MH874395KP124798MH862799KP124185KP125106KP123879
Alternaria alternataCBS 102600KP124953MH874396KP124799MH862800KP124186KP125107KP123880
Alternaria alternataCBS 102602KP124954MH877754KP124800KP124332KP124187KP125108KP123881
Alternaria alternataCBS 102603KP124955KP124485KP124801KP124333KP124188KP125109KP123882
Alternaria alternataCBS 102604KP124956MH874399KP124802MH862803-KP125110-
Alternaria alternataCBS 113013KP124963KP124493KP124809KP124341KP124195KP125117KP123889
Alternaria alternataCBS 113014KP124964KP124494KP124810KP124342KP124196KP125118KP123890
Alternaria alternataCBS 113015KP124965KP124495KP124811KP124343KP124197KP125119KP123891
Alternaria alternataCBS 119399KP124983KP124513KP124829KP124361-KP125137KP123910
Alternaria alternataCBS 120829KP124986KP124516KP124832KP124364KP124216KP125140KP123912
Alternaria alternataCBS 121344KP124988KP124518KP124834KP124365KP124217KP125142KP123913
Alternaria alternataCBS 121346KP124989KP124519KP124835KP124366KP124218KP125143KP123914
Alternaria alternataCBS 121492KP124994KP124524KP124840KP124370KP124222KP125148KP123918
Alternaria alternataCBS 124277KP124997KP124527KP124843KP124373KP124225KP125151KP123921
Alternaria alternataCBS 124278KP124998KP124528KP124844KP124374KP124226KP125152KP123922
Alternaria alternataCBS 916.96 TKC584507DQ678082KC584375AF347031AY278808KC584634-
Alternaria arborescensCBS 101.13KP125016KP124546KP124862KP124392KP125170KP124244KP123940
Alternaria arborescensCBS 105.24KP125017KP12454KP124863KP124393KP125171KP124245KP123941
Alternaria arborescensCBS 105.49KP125020KP124550KP124866KP124396KP125174KP124248KP123944
Alternaria arborescensCBS 108.41KP125018KP124548KP124864KP124394KP125172KP124246KP123942
Alternaria arborescensCBS 113.41KP125019KP124549KP124865KP124395KP125173KP124247KP123943
Alternaria arborescensCBS 750.68KP125021KP124551KP124868KP124398KP125176KP124250KP123945
Alternaria arborescensCBS 102605 TKC584509KC584253KC584377AF347033AY278810KC584636AY563303
Alternaria arborescensCBS 109730KP125022KP124552KP124869KP124399KP125177KP124251KP123946
Alternaria arborescensCBS 119544NG063030NG_069254KP124878MH863062KP125186JQ646321KP123955
Alternaria arborescensCBS 119545KP125032KP124562KY392798KP124409KP125187KP124260KP123956
Alternaria arborescensCBS 123267KP125035KP124565KP124882KP124412KP125190KP124263KP123959
Alternaria arctoseptataMFLUCC 21-0139 TMZ621874MZ621948OK236655-0K236608OK236702OK236755
Alternaria betae-kenyensisCBS 118810 TNG_063032NG_069256JQ905180NR136118JQ905161KP125197JQ905104
Alternaria baoshanensisMFLUCC 21-0124 TMZ621878MZ621952OK236659MZ622003OK236613OK236706OK236760
Alternaria breviconidiophoraMFLUCC 22-0075 TMZ621870MZ621944OK236651MZ621997OK236604OK236698OK236751
Alternaria breviconidiophoraMFLU 21-0317MZ621871MZ621945OK236652MZ621998OK236605OK236699OK236752
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 107.38 TNG063033N069257JQ646457NR136119JQ646305KP125198JQ646388
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 110.50KP125044KP124574KP124890KP124421KP124271KP125199KP123968
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 118816KP125046KP124576KP124892KP124423KP124273KP125201KP123970
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 118817KP125047KP124577KP124893KP124424KP124274KP125202KP123971
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 130264KP125048KP124578KP124894KP124425KP124275KP125203KP123972
Alternaria doliconidiumKUN-HKAS 100840TNG065142NG069551-NR158361---
Alternaria doliconidiumKUMCC 17-0263 TMG829094MG828980-MG828864---
Alternaria eichhorniaeCBS 119778KP125050KP124580KP124896KP124426KP124277KP125205-
Alternaria eichhorniaeCBS 489.92 TNG063034KP124579KP124895-KP124276KP125204KP123973
Alternaria ellipsoidialisMFLUCC 21-0132 TMZ621862MZ621936OK236643MZ621989OK236596OK236690OK236743
Alternaria eupatoriicolaMFLUCC 21-0122 TMZ621855MZ621929OK236636MZ621982OK236589OK236683OK236736
Alternaria falcataMFLUCC 21-0123 TMZ621865MZ62139OK236649MZ621992OK236599OK236693OK236746
Alternaria gaisenCBS 118488 TKP125051KP124581KP124897KP124427KP124278KP125206KP123975
Alternaria gaisenCBS 632.93KC584531KC584275KC584399KC584197KC584116KC584658KP123974
Alternaria gaisenCPC 25268KP125052KP124582KP124898KP124428KP124279KP125207KP123976
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 100.23KP125053KP124583KP124899KP124429KP124280KP125208KP123977
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 104.32 TKP125054KP124584KP124900KP124430JQ646312KP125209JQ646395
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 107.36KP125055KP124585KP124901KP124431-KP125210-
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 102597KP125056MH874393KP124902MH862797KP124281KP125211KP123978
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 102601KP125057MH874397KP124903MH862801KP124282KP125212KP123979
Alternaria iridiaustralisCBS 118486 TNG_063035NG_069258KP124905NR_136120KP124284KP125214KP123981
Alternaria iridiaustralisCBS 118487KP125060KP124590KP124906KP124436KP124285KP125215KP123982
Alternaria iridiaustralisCBS 118404KP125058KP124588KP124904KP124434KP124283KP125213KP123980
Alternaria italicaKUMCC 17-0090---MG764018---
Alternaria italicaMFLUCC 14-0421 T-MG818319MG859737MG764017---
Alternaria jacinthicolaCBS 133751 TKP125062KP124592KP124908KP124438KP124287KP125217KP123984
Alternaria jacinthicolaCBS 878.95KP125061KP124591KP124907KP124437KP124286KP125216KP123983
Alternaria jacinthicolaCPC 25267KP125063KP124593KP124909KP124439KP124288KP125218KP123985
Alternaria lathyriMFLUCC 21-0140 TMZ621847MZ621921OK236628MZ621974OK236581OK236675OK236728
Alternaria lathyriMFLU 21-0297MZ621848MZ621922OK236629MZ621975OK236582OK236676OK236729
Alternaria longipesCBS 113.35KP125064KP124594KP124910KP124440KP124289KP125219KP123986
Alternaria longipesCBS 121332KP125067KP124597KP124913KP124443KP124292KP125222KP123989
Alternaria longipesCBS 121333KP125068KP124598KP124914KP124444KP124293KP125223KP123990
Alternaria longipesCBS 539.94KP125065KP124595KP124911KP124441KP124290KP125220KP123987
Alternaria longipesCBS 540.94KC584541KC584285KC584409--KC584667-
Alternaria longipesCBS 917.96KP125066KP124596KP124912KP124442KP124291KP125221KP123988
Alternaria macilentaMFLUCC 21-0138 TMZ621845MZ621919OK236626MZ621972OK236579OK236673OK236726
Alternaria macroconidiaMFLUCC 21-0134 TMZ621876MZ621950OK236657MZ622001OK236610OK236704OK236757
Alternaria minimisporaMFLUCC 21-0127 TMZ621853MZ621927OK236634MZ621980OK236587OK236681OK236734
Alternaria muriformisporaMFLUCC 22-0073 TMZ621849MZ621923OK236630MZ621976OK236583OK236677OK236730
Alternaria muriformisporaMFLU 21-0309MZ621850MZ621924OK236631MZ621977OK236584OK236678OK236731
Alternaria oblongoellipsoideaMFLUCC 22-0074 TMZ621840MZ621914OK236621MZ621967OK236574OK236668OK236721
Alternaria obpyriconidiaMFLUCC 21-0121 TMZ621851MZ621925OK236633MZ621978OK236585OK236680OK236732
Alternaria obpyriconidiaMFLU 21-0300MZ621852MZ621926OK236632MZ621979OK236586OK236679OK236733
Alternaria orobanchesMFLUCC 21-0137TMZ621882MZ621956-MZ622007-OK236710OK236763
Alternaria ovoideaMFLUCC 14-0427TMZ621880MZ621954OK236661MZ622005OK236614OK236708OK236761
Alternaria phragmiticolaMFLUCC 21-0125 TMZ621867MZ621941OK236649MZ621994OK236602OK236696OK236749
Alternaria phragmiticolaMFLU 21-0316MZ621868MZ621942OK236650MZ621995OK236603OK236697OK236750
Alternaria pseudoinfectoriaMFLUCC 21-0126 TMZ621857MZ621931OK236638MZ621984OK236591OK236685OK236738
Alternaria pseudoinfectoriaMFLU 21-0311MZ621858MZ621932OK236639MZ621985OK236592OK236686OK236739
Alternaria rostroconidiaMFLUCC 21-0136 TMZ621842MZ621916OK236623MZ621969OK236576OK236670OK236723
Alternaria rostroconidiaMFLU 21-0318MZ621843MZ621917OK236624MZ621970OK236577OK236671OK236724
Alternaria salicicolaMFLUCC 22-0072 TMZ621872MZ621946OK236653MZ621999OK236606OK236700OK236753
Alternaria sp.CBS 108.27KC584601KC584343KC584468KC584236KC584162KC584727-
Alternaria tomatoCBS 103.30KP125069KP124599KP124915KP124445KP124294KP125224KP123991
Alternaria tomatoCBS 114.35KP125070KP124600KP124916KP124446KP124295KP125225KP123992
Alternaria torilisMFLUCC 21-0133MZ621859MZ621933OK236640MZ621986OK236593OK236687OK236740
Alternaria torilisMFLU 21-0299MZ621860MZ621934OK236642MZ621987OK236595OK236689OK236742
Alternaria torilisMFLUCC 14-0433 TMZ621861MZ621935OK236641MZ621988OK236594OK236688OK236741
Alternaria vitisMFLUCC 17-1109 T---MG764007---
Abbreviations: CBS: the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture Collection of Pedro Crous, Netherlands; KUMCC: Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, Yunnan, China; KUN-HKAS: Herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica, Yunnan, China; MFLU: the Herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Table 2. A nucleotide base comparison of Alternaria obpyriconidia with other phylogenetically related species.
Table 2. A nucleotide base comparison of Alternaria obpyriconidia with other phylogenetically related species.
SpeciesNucleotide Base Difference of Each Informative Gene Regions
Alt-a1gapdhITSrpb2tef1-α
Alternaria arctoseptata11/476 bp (2.3%)15/570 bp (2.6%)-39/560 bp (7.0%)4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. baoshanensis8/474 bp (1.7%)15/568 bp (2.6%)5/515 bp (1%)40/559 bp (7.2%)3/240 bp (1.3%)
A. falcata10/474 bp (2.1%)12/568 bp (2.1%)5/515 bp (1%)37/559 bp (6.6%)4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. macroconidia11/474 bp (2.3%)11/567 bp (1.9%)4/515 bp (0.8%)54/560 bp (9.6%)4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. ovoidea16/470 bp (3.4%)14/568 bp (2.5%)4/515 bp (0.8%)42/559 bp (7.5%)3/240 bp (1.3%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Phookamsak, R.; Jiang, H.; Bhat, D.J.; Camporesi, E.; Lumyong, S.; Kumla, J.; Hongsanan, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.; et al. Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090898

AMA Style

Li J, Phookamsak R, Jiang H, Bhat DJ, Camporesi E, Lumyong S, Kumla J, Hongsanan S, Mortimer PE, Xu J, et al. Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(9):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Junfu, Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Hongbo Jiang, Darbhe Jayarama Bhat, Erio Camporesi, Saisamorn Lumyong, Jaturong Kumla, Sinang Hongsanan, Peter E. Mortimer, Jianchu Xu, and et al. 2022. "Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 9: 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop