Next Article in Journal
Weeds as Pathogen Hosts and Disease Risk for Crops in the Wake of a Reduced Use of Herbicides: Evidence from Yam (Dioscorea alata) Fields and Colletotrichum Pathogens in the Tropics
Next Article in Special Issue
What Are the Best Parents for Hybrid Progeny? An Investigation into the Human Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus
Previous Article in Journal
Nonionizing Electromagnetic Field: A Promising Alternative for Growing Control Yeast
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tools for Assessing Translation in Cryptococcus neoformans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 4
10.3390/jof7040282
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes in Latin America: A Map of Molecular Types, Genotypic Diversity, and Antifungal Susceptibility as Reported by the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group

by
Carolina Firacative
1,*,
Wieland Meyer
2 and
Elizabeth Castañeda
3
1
Studies in Translational Microbiology and Emerging Diseases (MICROS) Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 111221, Colombia
2
Molecular Mycology Research Laboratory, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Research and Education Network Westmead Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School-Westmead Clinical School, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2145, Australia
3
Grupo de Microbiología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogota 111321, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(4), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040282
Submission received: 24 February 2021 / Revised: 20 March 2021 / Accepted: 1 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Genetic Tools for Studying Cryptococcus spp.)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cryptococcosis, a potentially fatal mycosis, is caused by members of the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes. In Latin America, cryptococcal meningitis is still an important health threat with a significant clinical burden. Analysis of publicly available molecular data from 5686 clinical, environmental, and veterinary cryptococcal isolates from member countries of the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group showed that, as worldwide, C. neoformans molecular type VNI is the most common cause of cryptococcosis (76.01%) in HIV-infected people, followed by C. gattii molecular type VGII (12.37%), affecting mostly otherwise healthy hosts. These two molecular types also predominate in the environment (68.60% for VNI and 20.70% for VGII). Among the scarce number of veterinary cases, VGII is the predominant molecular type (73.68%). Multilocus sequence typing analysis showed that, in Latin America, the C. neoformans population is less diverse than the C. gattii population (D of 0.7104 vs. 0.9755). Analysis of antifungal susceptibility data showed the presence of non-wild-type VNI, VGI, VGII, and VGIII isolates in the region. Overall, the data presented herein summarize the progress that has been made towards the molecular epidemiology of cryptococcal isolates in Latin America, contributing to the characterization of the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of these globally spreading pathogenic yeasts.

1. Introduction

In Latin America, as is the case globally, cryptococcosis affects predominantly immunocompromised male patients, with HIV infection being the main predisposing risk factor [1]. Cryptococcal meningitis, which is the main presentation of cryptococcosis, remains a significant burden in adults from many regions of the world where there is a high HIV seroprevalence [2]. Despite great improvements in antiretroviral therapy, cryptococcosis is still associated with high morbidity and mortality [1,3]. In Latin America, 3.7 million people lives with HIV, of which ~40% do not have access to antiretroviral therapy. In 2019 alone, there were 120,000 new HIV infections, representing an increase of 7% of new diagnoses annually compared with 2010 [4]. Although there are few reports regarding the incidence and prevalence of cryptococcosis in the region, studies from Brazil and Colombia have reported an average annual incidence from 2.4 to 4.5 cases of meningeal cryptococcosis per million inhabitants, in the general population, and 3000 to 3300 cases per million HIV-infected people [5,6]. In reports from Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, and Venezuela, cryptococcosis has had a prevalence from 10 to 76% among the most frequent mycosis [7,8,9,10,11,12]. In addition, the mortality ranges between 30 and 60% of cases, although, in Brazil, it has been reported to be as high as 73% [13]. Together, these data show that cryptococcosis is still an important health threat in Latin America.
For the last few decades, several widely used molecular methods have been applied worldwide to determine the genotypes of clinical, environmental, and veterinary isolates of the members of the Cryptococcus neoformans sensu lato and Cryptococcus gattii sensu lato species complexes, the etiological agents of cryptococcosis, to study their geographical distribution, molecular epidemiology, and population genetics, which have contributed to a deeper understanding of these deadly pathogens. Among such molecular techniques, PCR fingerprinting [14], amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) [15,16], microsatellite typing [17], restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) [18], and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [19] have allowed for the identification of eight major molecular types within the species complexes globally: VNI (AFLP1) and VNII (AFLP1A/B) for C. neoformans var. grubii serotype A isolates; VNIV (AFLP2) for C. neoformans var. neoformans serotype D isolates; VNIII (AFLP3) for hybrids between the serotypes A and D; and VGI (AFLP4), VGII (AFLP6), VGIII (AFLP5), and VGIV (AFLP7) for C. gattii serotypes B and C isolates. More recently, additional molecular types, represented by fewer isolates, have been described in more restricted geographical regions, such as the molecular type VNB in C. neoformans, which was initially reported in Botswana [20], and the molecular type VGV in C. gattii, reported among environmental isolates in the Central Zambezian Miombo Woodlands [21]. Lately, whole genome sequencing (WGS) [22,23], a more recently developed and increasingly more affordable molecular technique, has been applied not only to identify major molecular types, but also to provide information about the genomic diversity between the genotypes of both C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes, providing a much higher resolution than MLST, and serving as a basis for population genetics studies rather than simple strain typing. Although, in 2015, there was a proposal for naming seven separate species among the cryptococcal molecular types, named C. neoformans for VNI, VNII, and VNB; C. deneoformans for VNIV; C. gattii for VGI; C. deuterogattii for VGII; C. bacillisporus for VGIII; C. tetragattii for VGIV; and C. decagattii for VGIV and VGIIIc/AFLP10 [24], the terms “C. neoformans species complex” and “C. gattii species complex” will be used through this review, as a consensus on the nomenclature of the cryptococcal species has not yet been achieved [25] and most reviewed publications do not utilize the seven-species name system, but rather the molecular types.
The above-mentioned molecular methods have been essential tools to study the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complexes, giving foundations to better understand the differences in the geographical and environmental distribution, the host preference, virulence, clinical manifestations, and antifungal susceptibility of the isolates between major molecular types/species [26,27,28,29,30]. The aim of this review was thus to gather and analyze publicly available data on the molecular epidemiology of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes in Latin America, in order to enable a more complete picture of the distribution of the molecular types in the region, their diversity, and their antifungal susceptibility profiles, which in turn will contribute to the comprehension of the global structure of these pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

Data were obtained from the previous revision on cryptococcosis in Latin America, published by two authors of the current review, covering publications dating from 1999 to mid-2017 [1]. In addition, a new literature search was undertaken comprising studies published from mid-2017 to December 2020, focusing on the molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus and cryptococcosis in Latin America, including publications in English and Spanish from PubMed, SciELO, and Google databases. The literature search was based on the keywords “cryptococcus”, “cryptococcosis”, “molecular type”, “PCR fingerprinting”, “AFLP”, “microsatellite typing”, “RFLP”, “MLST”, “WGS”, or “antifungal susceptibility”, in combination with the names of 20 Latin American countries, which participate in the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela). In addition, researchers from the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group were contacted to request data from studies that have not been included in the above-mentioned public databases. All publications, in which the major molecular type, independently of the technique used, and/or data on MLST of the isolates were provided, were included in the review.
Data obtained from MLST typing, performed using the International Society of Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) consensus MLST scheme for C. neoformans and C. gattii, which includes six genetic loci, CAP59, GPD1, LAC1, PLB1, SOD1, and URA5 genes, and the intergenic spacer region IGS1 [19], were gathered. Based on the obtained sequence data, a dendrogram, per species complex, showing the genetic relationship between the isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii from Latin America was constructed with the program MEGA 7.0 [31], using maximum likelihood analysis of the seven concatenated loci. To estimate the genetic diversity of the C. neoformans and C. gattii populations, the Simpsons diversity index (D) was calculated per species complex, as well as for the source of the isolates, considering the number of sequence types (STs) found and the frequency of each ST. The range of D is from 0 to 1, where high scores (close to 1) indicate high diversity and low scores (close to 0) indicate low diversity [32].
Data on antifungal susceptibility testing were also gathered and analyzed. Independently of the methodology applied, values of the range and the geometric mean of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and/or posaconazole were considered for the analysis, when these values were specified per molecular type. As there are no clinical breakpoints for Cryptococcus spp., the epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) >95% per molecular type and per antifungal drug was assessed, when available, to define if the isolates are distributed or not among the wild-type population [27,28] (Table S1).
Most antifungal susceptibility data included in this review were obtained using the microdilution method in RPMI broth according to the M27-A3 guideline of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [33]. However, data obtained by other methods, such as the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) method E.Def.7.2. [34], E-test strips (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France), the Casitone broth microdilution method [35], Sensititre YeastOne plates (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), the Vitek-2 Compact system (bioMerieux, France), and disk diffusion (Cecon-Sensifungidisc, São Paulo, Brazil), have also been reported.

3. Results

3.1. C. neoformans VNI and C. gattii VGII Predominate in Latin America

To date, 106 publications have reported the major molecular type of 5686 isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii from Latin America, identified mostly by RFLP (57.14%). From those, 65 publications were retrieved from the revision on cryptococcosis in Latin America and 41 were found afterwards [15,17,18,20,32,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135]. Most publications were exclusive for one country; however, some other publications reported data from two or more countries. Overall, molecular type data were available from 15 of the 20 Latin American countries (Table 1). No molecular data of cryptococcal strains from the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Panama have yet been reported.
From the isolates, dating back to 1961 [18], 3976 were recovered from clinical specimens (69.93%), followed by 1691 environmental samples (29.74%) and 19 veterinary (0.33%) cases. From the clinical isolates, it was determined that the molecular type VNI, corresponding to C. neoformans var. grubii, serotype A, predominantly causes cryptococcosis in Latin America (76.01%), followed by C. gattii molecular type VGII (12.37%). In the environment, although with slightly different proportions, the molecular types VNI (68.60%) and VGII (20.70%) also predominate, with different reservoirs for each species complex. While C. neoformans species complex is mostly recovered from avian excreta, decaying organic matter, and soil, C. gattii species complex is associated with diverse species of both native and foreign trees.
Clinical case reports were uncommon, comprising only 16 publications, describing four VGI, five VGII, and three VGIII C. gattii cases, as well as four VNI C. neoformans cases. From them, cryptococcosis occurred rarely in HIV-infected people, but rather in patients with other risk factors, such as renal transplant and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, as well as in immunocompetent hosts, including children. Apart from meningitis, bone marrow involvement, primary cutaneous cryptococcosis, and a tongue lesion were also reported [48,59,60,72,74,86,91,101,108,115,117,118,124,131,132,134].
Together with a review of cryptococcosis in children from Colombia, where the authors reported the molecular type of the isolates (29 VNI, 3 VNII, and 2 VGII) [97], one study from Brazil reported six apparently healthy children (up to 12 years old) and seven adolescents/young adults aged 13 to 19 years presenting with cryptococcal meningitis by C. gattii VGII, from which five cases (38.4%) were fatal [51]. In addition to those studies, three case reports, caused by C. gattii, have been published in Latin America with the molecular data of this mycosis in pediatric patients. One VGII case of a 5-year-old boy from Brazil [48], one VGIII case of a 7-year-old girl from Argentina [117], both with successful outcomes, and one fatal VGII case of a 10-year-old boy from Colombia [108]. Remarkably, the cases from Argentina and Colombia were from indigenous, otherwise healthy kids, who had central nervous system involvement.
From the less frequently recovered veterinary isolates, reported in two articles and eight case reports from Brazil, Cuba, and Chile, the molecular type VGII was predominant (73.68%), followed by VNI (15.79%), VGIII (5.26%), and VGI (5.26%) (Table 1). When stated, veterinary cases were from seven cats, five dogs, two goats, a guinea pig, and a cheetah held in a zoo [55,62,70,71,76,81,123,133].
The combined analysis of the molecular data also showed that only in Mexico have all eight major molecular types been reported, while in Brazil and Argentina, there are no reports of VGIV isolates, and in Colombia, VNIII has not been reported (Figure 1). However, in Brazil, 13 VNB isolates, previously thought to be exclusive from Botswana, have been reported not only from the environment [75], but also from clinical cases [85]. Also in Brazil, a new singular cluster, denominated as AFLP1C, representing a unique molecular type, was identified in 23 isolates [77]. In addition, apart from VNIII, which is the most common hybrid found in C. neoformans, other inter- and intra-specific hybrids have been reported in Latin America. Fifteen isolates described as VNII/VNIV hybrids were reported from Argentina, another isolate with the same genotype VNII/VNIV, two isolates VNI/VGII, and one isolate VNI/VNII from Brazil, as well as five isolates VNI/VNII and one isolate VNI/VGII from Colombia [85,119,136,137].
When stated, mating type alpha was the most common mating type in both C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates from Latin America. In the region, mating type a has been reported in C. neoformans in only two clinical VNI isolates from Brazil [53]. In contrast, in C. gattii, mating type a is slightly more common. In Colombia, 15 environmental VGII isolates, 1 VGI, and 12 VGII clinical isolates were mating type a [94,95,106], as well as 17 clinical and 3 environmental VGII isolates from Brazil [61,68,77], as well as 2 VGIII clinical isolates recovered in Mexico [32].

3.2. In Latin America, C. neoformans Species Complex Is Genetically Less Diverse than C. gattii Species Complex

Taking advantage of the data analysis, unique nomenclature, and interlaboratory comparability of MLST, it was possible to gather 367 MLST profiles of C. neoformans and 400 of C. gattii isolates from Latin America, reported in 26 publications [20,32,61,66,68,73,75,79,81,84,87,90,91,98,100,106,109,117,123,124,128,138,139,140,141,142]. MLST studies with clinical and environmental C. neoformans isolates have been reported from Brazil (77.11%), Peru (12.53%), Colombia (9.54), and Argentina (0.82%), while MLST studies with clinical, environmental, and veterinary C. gattii isolates have been reported from Brazil (65.25%), Colombia (26.25%), Mexico (5%), Argentina (1%), Venezuela (1%), and Uruguay (0.75%), as well as Cuba, Guatemala, and Paraguay with one isolate each (0.25%).
From the MLST profiles, the isolates were more frequently VNI (93.73%) among C. neoformans and more frequently VGII (74.75%) among C. gattii. While the number of isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii studied so far in Latin America by MLST differs only slightly (367 vs. 400), there is a considerable difference in the number of identified STs (41 vs. 149). Thus, the genetic diversity, as calculated with the Simpsons diversity index (D), is clearly lower in C. neoformans compared with C. gattii (0.7104 vs. 0.9755). In addition, when analyzing the diversity of the isolates in both populations, depending on the source, it is evident that, in C. neoformans, the environmental isolates are more diverse than the clinical isolates, while in C. gattii, not only the clinical, but also the veterinary isolates are more diverse than those recovered from the environment (Table 2).
From the 41 STs identified in C. neoformans species complex, 5 STs contained more than 75% of the isolates, which included both clinical and environmental samples. ST93 was the most frequent ST (52.04%), followed by ST77 (11.17%), ST2 (4.90%), ST5 (4.63%), and ST23 (3%) (Figure 2a). In contrast, from the 149 STs identified in C. gattii species complex, the 5 more frequent STs contained only 30.5% of the isolates. ST25 was the most common ST (9%), followed by ST20 (6.5%), ST7 (6%), ST79 (5.25%), and ST40 (3.75%). While ST25, ST20, ST7, and ST79 grouped clinical and environmental isolates, ST40 grouped only clinical isolates (Figure 2b). Of note, ST20 and ST7 correspond to the sub-types VGIIa and VGIIb, respectively, which were responsible for the Vancouver Island outbreak, which started in 1999 and is still ongoing [143]. In 11 veterinary cases caused by C. gattii, 8 STs were identified. From those, ST185 has been identified as well in human and environmental samples, ST182, ST248, and ST309 in human samples, but ST198, ST442, ST486, and ST489 are, so far, exclusively veterinary.

3.3. Most Isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii Species Complexes from Latin America Show a Wild-Type Antifungal Susceptibility; However, Non-Wild-Type VNI, VGI, VGII, and VGIII Isolates Have Also Been Identified

The susceptibility to the commonly used antifungal drugs has been determined in 570 cryptococcal isolates from Latin America, based on data gathered from 23 publications [17,32,52,54,58,59,60,63,65,66,72,77,79,81,85,89,90,91,116,117,123,124,134]. From the 570 isolates, all have data on antifungal susceptibility to fluconazole, 434 to amphotericin-B, 296 to itraconazole, 251 to voriconazole, 250 to 5-fluorocytosine, and 192 to posaconazole. In order of frequency, the isolates were VNI (58.42%), VGII (19.47%), VGIII (10%), VNIV (6.32%), VNII (2.81%), VGI (1.23), VNB (1.05%), and VNIII (0.70%) (Table 3 and Table 4), recovered mainly from Brazil (65.79%), followed by Argentina (14.56%); Cuba (10%); Colombia (6.49%); Mexico (2.46%); and Bolivia, Guatemala, Paraguay, and Venezuela with one isolate each (0.18%).
Although most cryptococcal isolates in Latin America are wild-type to all antifungal drugs, in C. neoformans, among the molecular type VNI, non-wild-type isolates to amphotericin-B [58,89,116] and fluconazole [58,63,65,72,85,89,116] have been reported in Brazil and Argentina, to itraconazole in Brazil and Cuba [17,65], and to voriconazole in Brazil [89]. From the fluconazole non-wild-type VNI isolates, one was a case recovered from an HIV-positive patient with relapsing/refractory cryptococcosis that became fluconazole non-susceptible after 26 months (MIC from 16 to 32 µg/mL) and long-term use of liposomal amphotericin-B [72]. Moreover, among the VNI isolates, even though the MIC was not reported, resistance to amphotericin-B and to itraconazole was found in three and six isolates, respectively, belonging to the ST93, the most common MLST genotype in Latin America [75]. By disk diffusion, five and one VNI isolates from Brazil were reported to be intermediate (I) and resistant (R) to fluconazole, respectively (inhibition haloes diameters of I: 19–14 mm and R: <14 mm) [52].
Similarly, in C. gattii, non-wild-type VGII isolates to fluconazole [54,85], itraconazole [81], and voriconazole [81,89] have been reported in Brazil. Among the molecular type VGIII, fluconazole non-wild-type isolates have been described in Argentina, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico [32,117,134]. In addition, although there are no data on ECV for amphotericin-B in VGIII, one isolate from Colombia and one from Mexico, of this molecular type, have shown high MICs to this antifungal drug (2 and 1 µg/mL, respectively) [32]. In one clinical case from Brazil [60] and one veterinary case from Cuba [123], both caused by C. gattii molecular type VGI, 5-fluorocytosine non-wild-type isolates were reported as well. By disk diffusion, two VGII isolates from Brazil were reported to be resistant to fluconazole (inhibition halo diameter <14 mm) [52].

4. Discussion

Analysis of more than 5000 cryptococcal isolates recovered in Latin American countries, which have data on the major molecular type, allowed to establish a precise description of the molecular epidemiology of the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complexes in the region, together with the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of the isolates. Regardless of the country, in Latin America, C. neoformans VNI is not only the main etiologic agent of cryptococcosis (~76%) but is also the most recovered molecular type from environmental reservoirs (~69%), as it occurs globally [26]. Cryptococcosis by C. gattii, which is significantly less frequent in the world (<20%) [26], is also less frequent in Latin America, and it is most commonly caused by the molecular type VGII (~13%), which differs from other regions, as VGI isolates prevail in Asia, Europe, and Oceania, and VGIV in Africa [30]. Although VGII also predominates among the C. gattii isolates causing disease in North America, as well as in the environment, its prevalence refers mostly to the VGIIa subtype, which is influenced by the great effort made to understand the cause of the Vancouver Island outbreak and its clonal expansion into the USA [144,145].
In Latin America, the incidence of cryptococcal meningitis by C. neoformans, which mirrors the high number of HIV infections in the region, is not reducing because there is still a significant percentage of patients with no access to antiretroviral therapy or, despite availability, there may be problems of adherence and retention in HIV care, as reported elsewhere [2]. The number of people with HIV/AIDS who are undiagnosed, lost to follow-up, and living in resource-limited areas leads in addition to a late or incorrect diagnosis, which worsens prognosis and increases mortality [1]. Cryptococcosis by C. gattii, on the other hand, is also an important public health problem in Latin America, as it affects mostly HIV-seronegative individuals, apparently immunocompetent and, although rare, children. Notably, pediatric cryptococcosis has been reported in 32 and 29% of all cases in certain areas of Brazil and Colombia, respectively, where there is a high prevalence of C. gattii VGII infection in immunocompetent patients, which represents a unique prevalence pattern of this mycosis in children in the world [51,96,97,146,147,148]. Together, this reaffirms the endemic occurrence of primary cryptococcosis and early cryptococcal infection in some Latin American countries, although genetic determinants, which can be risk factors for the affected patients, have not been fully studied.
In the environment in Latin America, C. neoformans prevails in soil enriched with excreta, mostly from pigeons and other birds, such as captive birds, as reported globally [26]. However, after the first report on the isolation of C. gattii from the Australian native tree Eucalyptus camaldulensis [149], both cryptococcal species, although mostly C. gattii, have been successfully recovered from detritus, plant material, tree hollows, decayed woods, and even houses built with wood of a large variety of trees in Latin America, including native trees such as Acacia visco, Cassia grandis, Hymenaea courbaril, Moquilea tomentosa, Peltophorum dubium, Plathymenia reticulata, Tabebuia avellanedae, Tabebuia guayacan, Tabebuia rosea, Tipuana tipu, and Roystonea regia, as well as introduced trees such as Casuarina equisetifolia, Cedrus deodara, Corymbia ficifolia, Croton spp., Cupressus sempervirens, Delonix regia, E. camaldulensis, Eucalyptus tereticornis, Eucalyptus spp., Ficus spp., Grevillea robusta, Phoenix spp., Senna siamea, Terminalia catappa, and Ulmus campestris, among others [1,150,151,152]. Remarkably, as Latin American countries have a wide diversity of climates, landscapes, and ecosystems, both C. neoformans and C. gattii have been recovered from rainforest to desertic and dry environments, from urban and rural cities to native forest, and from sea-level to altitudes exceeding 2700 m [152,153,154]. Knowing the saprophytic source of cryptococcal species, the most recovered molecular types from clinical samples, VNI and VGII, also prevail in the environment in Latin America.
Even though cryptococcosis can occur in a very wide range of terrestrial and marine animals, including domestic, free-living, and wildlife, veterinary cases are more likely to go unrecognized, undiagnosed, and unreported compared with clinical cases [155]. In a greater extent than human cryptococcosis, most countries lack reliable information on the prevalence and incidence of animal cryptococcosis, which is not a reportable disease; hence, epidemiological investigations are further hampered. Yet, despite the few reports of cryptococcal infection in animals in Latin America, it is of note that C. gattii VGII is reported more frequently than C. neoformans VNI causing veterinary cases, which is opposite to the prevalence of these two molecular types in human and environmental samples. However, owing to the small number of isolates analyzed, it is not possible to make assumptions about this discrepancy. As in clinical cases, a correlation between veterinary cases and the geographical distribution of C. neoformans and C. gattii has been reported in Australia [156], Vancouver Island (Canada) [143,145], and the USA [157,158]. The occurrence of veterinary cases in Latin America should be nevertheless emphasized, because, while cryptococcosis is not transmissible between animals or humans, animals act as crucial sentinels for human cryptococcal infection [155].
In Latin America, except for certain cases in Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico, clinical, environmental, and veterinary cryptococcal isolates are almost always mating type alpha, regardless of species complex and molecular type, which obeys the distribution of mating types globally [26,30]. The rare finding of mating type a in C. neoformans in Latin America may explain the extensive clonality, low diversity (D = 0.7104), and overrepresentation of certain genotypes (STs) in this population, as it may not be sexually recombining in the region. The presence of both mating types in a population, which may lead to sexual reproduction, has been described, for instance, in the highly diverse C. neoformans population in Africa, where 22% of the VNB and 1 to 4% of the VNI isolates are mating type a, reproduce sexually in the laboratory, and generate fertile progeny [73,159,160]. Similarly, the higher frequency of mating type a C. gattii isolates in Latin America may explain the higher diversity of this population (D = 0.9755) and may indicate that there is genetic recombination, which has already been described in the VGII and VGIII populations by MLST and WGS studies [32,68,135]. Sexual reproduction of cryptococcal species in the environment, however, remains a mystery.
The analysis of the antifungal susceptibility profiles of members of the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complexes in Latin America showed that most VNI, VGI, VGII, and VGIII isolates distribute among the wild-type populations of each molecular type per drug. However, the presence of non-wild-type isolates to more than one antifungal drug, which has been reported from various countries in the region (Table 3 and Table 4), emphasizes the importance of carrying out antifungal susceptibility testing. Amphotericin-B and fluconazole non-wild-type VNI isolates, as well as fluconazole non-wild-type VGII isolates, are of concern, not only because these molecular types are the most common in the region, but also because these antifungals are the drugs of choice for the induction phase of the therapy in most Latin American countries [1]. Susceptibility profiles, although they are not routinely determined in cryptococcal isolates in the region, can be utilized to choose substitute treatments in patients failing to respond to first-line therapy [3,161]. For instance, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, which have shown to have a better in vitro activity against C. gattii than fluconazole, could represent valuable alternatives for the treatment of patients with fluconazole-resistant strains [161]. Even though there are no data on clinical breakpoints, the determination of MIC values is also recommended to monitor epidemiological trends [27,28]. As such, further research on antifungal susceptibility in C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes is necessary to establish the relationship between MIC, drug dosing, and clinical outcome.

5. Conclusions

The increasing application of genotyping methods to study the etiological agents of cryptococcosis in Latin America has generated a large amount of data that have greatly contributed to the global study of the members of the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complexes, in order to discover their population structure; to recognize their great inter- and intra-species genetic diversity; to understand how these pathogenic yeasts are spreading around the world; and to better define the disease aspects of cryptococcosis, an important mycosis in the region. These results indicate that the identification of cryptococcal species, genotypes, and region of origin may be important when deciding on treatment options for cryptococcosis and to forecast the expansion of the molecular types/species complexes and possible reasons for their emergence and expansion in other regions of the world. Constant clinical and veterinary surveillance, and additional environmental sampling, together with the application of more advanced molecular techniques, such as WGS of a larger set of isolates, are needed to further expand our knowledge on the correlation of the genomic features of the cryptococcal species with their complex biological traits that make them successful pathogens.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7040282/s1, Table S1: Data on the epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) >95% per drug and molecular type as reported elsewhere.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.F., W.M. and E.C.; methodology, C.F.; software, C.F.; validation, C.F., W.M. and E.C.; formal analysis, C.F.; investigation, C.F.; resources, C.F., W.M. and E.C.; data curation, C.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.; writing—review and editing, C.F., W.M. and E.C.; visualization, C.F.; supervision, W.M. and E.C.; project administration, C.F.; funding acquisition, C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by Universidad del Rosario, Dirección de Investigación e Innovación.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited. The processed data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

To the Latin American Cryptococcal Study group, Argentina (Alicia Arechavala, Hospital de Infecciosas FJ Muñiz, Buenos Aires; Susana Córdoba, Mariana Mazza, Constanza Taverna, Guillermina Isla, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas ANLIS Dr Carlos G Malbrán, Buenos Aires; Laura Chiapello, Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología (CIBICI) CONICET); Brazil (Kennio Ferreira-Paim, Mario León Silva Vergara, Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais; Marcia S. C. Melhem, Maria Walderez Szeszs, Marilena dos Anjos Martins, Lucas Xavier Bonfietti, Rogério Antonio de Oliveira, Lidiane de Oliveira, Dayane Christine Silva Santos, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria da Saúde, São Paulo; Fabio Brito-Santos, Marcia S. Lazera, Luciana Trilles, Bodo Wanke, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro); Chile (María Cristina Díaz, Programa de Microbiología y Micología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago); Colombia (Patricia Escandón, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá; María Clara Noguera, Universidad Metropolitana, Barranquilla; Jairo Lizarazo, Universidad de Pamplona, Hospital Universitario Erasmo Meoz, Internal Medicine Department, Cúcuta); Cuba (María Teresa Illnait-Zaragozí, Tropical Medicine Institute Pedro Kourí, Bacteriology-Mycology Department Research, Diagnosis and Reference Centre, Havana; Carlos Manuel Fernández Andreu, Gerardo Félix Martínez Machín); Mexico (Laura Rosio Castañón, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México); Peru (Beatriz Bustamante, Attending Physician, Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú; Clinical Mycology Laboratory, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt-Cayetano Heredia University, Lima); Venezuela (Maribel Dolande, Giussepe Ferrara, Instituto Nacional de Higiene Rafael Rangel, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Firacative, C.; Lizarazo, J.; Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Castaneda, E. The status of cryptococcosis in Latin America. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, e170554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Williamson, P.R.; Jarvis, J.N.; Panackal, A.A.; Fisher, M.C.; Molloy, S.F.; Loyse, A.; Harrison, T.S. Cryptococcal meningitis: Epidemiology, immunology, diagnosis and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mourad, A.; Perfect, J.R. The war on cryptococcosis: A Review of the antifungal arsenal. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, e170391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. UNAIDS. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2021).
  5. Leimann, B.C.; Koifman, R.J. Cryptococcal meningitis in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, 1994-2004. Cad. Saude Publica 2008, 24, 2582–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Escandon, P.; Lizarazo, J.; Agudelo, C.I.; Castaneda, E. Cryptococcosis in Colombia: Compilation and Analysis of Data from Laboratory-Based Surveillance. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Barriga, G.; Asumir, C.; Mercado, N.F. Actualidades y tendencias en la etiología de las meningoencefalitis causadas por hongos y bacterias (1980-2004). Rev. Lat. Patol. Clin. 2005, 52, 240–245. [Google Scholar]
  8. Castro-Jiménez, M.A.; Rey-Benito, J.R.; Duque-Beltrán, S.; Pinilla-Guevara, C.A.; Bello-Pieruccini, S.; Agudelo-Mahecha, C.M.; Álvarez-Moreno, C.A. Diagnóstico de micosis oportunistas en pacientes con VIH/sida: Un estudio de casos en Colombia. Infectio 2011, 15, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Davel, G.; Canteros, C.E. Epidemiological status of mycoses in the Argentine Republic. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2007, 39, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaona-Flores, V.A.; Campos-Navarro, L.A.; Cervantes-Tovar, R.M.; Alcalá-Martínez, E. The epidemiology of fungemia in an infectious diseases hospital in Mexico city: A 10-year retrospective review. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mendez-Tovar, L.J.; Mejia-Mercado, J.A.; Manzano-Gayosso, P.; Hernandez-Hernandez, F.; Lopez-Martinez, R.; Silva-Gonzalez, I. Frequency of invasive fungal infections in a Mexican High-Specialty Hospital. Experience of 21 years. Rev. Médica del Inst. Mex. del Seguro Soc. 2016, 54, 581–587. [Google Scholar]
  12. Reviákina, V.; Panizo, M.; Dolande, M.; Selgrad, S. Diagnóstico inmunológico de las micosis sistémicas durante cinco años 2002–2006. Rev. Soc. Ven Microbiol. 2007, 27, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
  13. Moreira Tde, A.; Ferreira, M.S.; Ribas, R.M.; Borges, A.S. Cryptococosis: Clinical epidemiological laboratorial study and fungi varieties in 96 patients. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2006, 39, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Meyer, W.; Mitchell, T.G. Polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting in fungi using single primers specific to minisatellites and simple repetitive DNA sequences: Strain variation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Electrophoresis 1995, 16, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boekhout, T.; Theelen, B.; Diaz, M.; Fell, J.W.; Hop, W.C.; Abeln, E.C.; Dromer, F.; Meyer, W. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology 2001, 147, 891–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hagen, F.; Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Bartlett, K.H.; Swinne, D.; Geertsen, E.; Klaassen, C.H.; Boekhout, T.; Meis, J.F. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities and amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping of a worldwide collection of 350 clinical, veterinary, and environmental Cryptococcus gattii isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 5139–5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Martinez-Machin, G.F.; Fernandez-Andreu, C.M.; Hagen, F.; Boekhout, T.; Klaassen, C.H.; Meis, J.F. Microsatellite typing and susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Cuban patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Meyer, W.; Castañeda, A.; Jackson, S.; Huynh, M.; Castañeda, E. The IberoAmerican Cryptococcal Study Group Molecular typing of IberoAmerican Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Meyer, W.; Aanensen, D.M.; Boekhout, T.; Cogliati, M.; Diaz, M.R.; Esposto, M.C.; Fisher, M.; Gilgado, F.; Hagen, F.; Kaocharoen, S.; et al. Consensus multi-locus sequence typing scheme for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Litvintseva, A.P.; Thakur, R.; Vilgalys, R.; Mitchell, T.G. Multilocus sequence typing reveals three genetic subpopulations of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (serotype A), including a unique population in Botswana. Genetics 2006, 172, 2223–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Farrer, R.A.; Chang, M.; Davis, M.J.; van Dorp, L.; Yang, D.H.; Shea, T.; Sewell, T.R.; Meyer, W.; Balloux, F.; Edwards, H.M.; et al. A new lineage of Cryptococcus gattii (VGV) discovered in the Central Zambezian Miombo Woodlands. MBio 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Loftus, B.J.; Fung, E.; Roncaglia, P.; Rowley, D.; Amedeo, P.; Bruno, D.; Vamathevan, J.; Miranda, M.; Anderson, I.J.; Fraser, J.A.; et al. The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 2005, 307, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. D’Souza, C.A.; Kronstad, J.W.; Taylor, G.; Warren, R.; Yuen, M.; Hu, G.; Jung, W.H.; Sham, A.; Kidd, S.E.; Tangen, K.; et al. Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts. MBio 2011, 2, e00342-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hagen, F.; Khayhan, K.; Theelen, B.; Kolecka, A.; Polacheck, I.; Sionov, E.; Falk, R.; Parnmen, S.; Lumbsch, H.T.; Boekhout, T. Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 78, 16–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Bennett, J.E.; Wickes, B.L.; Meyer, W.; Cuomo, C.A.; Wollenburg, K.R.; Bicanic, T.A.; Castaneda, E.; Chang, Y.C.; Chen, J.; et al. The case for adopting the "Species complex" nomenclature for the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. mSphere 2017, 2, e00357-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Fraser, J.A.; Doering, T.L.; Wang, Z.; Janbon, G.; Idnurm, A.; Bahn, Y.S. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a019760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Espinel-Ingroff, A.; Aller, A.I.; Canton, E.; Castanon-Olivares, L.R.; Chowdhary, A.; Cordoba, S.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Fothergill, A.; Fuller, J.; Govender, N.; et al. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: An international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 5898–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Espinel-Ingroff, A.; Chowdhary, A.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Fothergill, A.; Fuller, J.; Hagen, F.; Govender, N.; Guarro, J.; Johnson, E.; Lass-Florl, C.; et al. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: An international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B and flucytosine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3107–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wiesner, D.L.; Moskalenko, O.; Corcoran, J.M.; McDonald, T.; Rolfes, M.A.; Meya, D.B.; Kajumbula, H.; Kambugu, A.; Bohjanen, P.R.; Knight, J.F.; et al. Cryptococcal genotype influences immunologic response and human clinical outcome after meningitis. MBio 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Cogliati, M. Global molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii: An atlas of the molecular types. Scientifica 2013, 2013, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Firacative, C.; Roe, C.C.; Malik, R.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Escandon, P.; Sykes, J.E.; Castanon-Olivares, L.R.; Contreras-Peres, C.; Samayoa, B.; Sorrell, T.C.; et al. MLST and whole-genome-based population analysis of Cryptococcus gattii VGIII links clinical, veterinary and environmental strains, and reveals divergent serotype specific sub-populations and distant ancestors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 3rd ed.; CLSI document M27-A3; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  34. Arendrup, M.C.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Lass-Florl, C.; Hope, W.; Eucast, A. EUCAST technical note on the EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.2: Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts EDef 7.2 (EUCAST-AFST). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, E246–E247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Fernandez-Andreu, C.M.; Pimentel-Turino, T.; Martinez-Machin, G.F.; González-Miranda, M. Determinación de la concentración mínima inhibitoria de fluconazol frente a Cryptococcus neoformans. Rev. Cuba. Med. Trop. 1999, 51, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  36. Casali, A.K.; Goulart, L.; Rosa e Silva, L.K.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Amaral, A.A.; Alves, S.H.; Schrank, A.; Meyer, W.; Vainstein, M.H. Molecular typing of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Trilles, L.; Lazera, M.; Wanke, B.; Theelen, B.; Boekhout, T. Genetic characterization of environmental isolates of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex from Brazil. Med. Mycol. 2003, 41, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Igreja, R.P.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Galhardo, M.C.; Kidd, S.E.; Meyer, W. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from AIDS patients of the Brazilian city, Rio de Janeiro. Med. Mycol. 2004, 42, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Abegg, M.A.; Cella, F.L.; Faganello, J.; Valente, P.; Schrank, A.; Vainstein, M.H. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii isolated from the excreta of psittaciformes in a southern Brazilian zoological garden. Mycopathologia 2006, 161, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Medeiros Ribeiro, A.; Silva, L.K.; Silveira Schrank, I.; Schrank, A.; Meyer, W.; Henning Vainstein, M. Isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans serotype D from Eucalyptus in South Brazil. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Matsumoto, M.T.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Baeza, L.C.; Melhem Mde, S.; Medes-Giannini, M.J. Genotyping, serotyping and determination of mating-type of Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates from São Paulo State, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2007, 49, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lugarini, C.; Goebel, C.S.; Condas, L.A.; Muro, M.D.; de Farias, M.R.; Ferreira, F.M.; Vainstein, M.H. Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from Passerine and Psittacine bird excreta in the state of Parana, Brazil. Mycopathologia 2008, 166, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ribeiro, M.A.; Ngamskulrungroj, P. Molecular characterization of environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolated in Vitoria, ES, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2008, 50, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Santos, W.R.; Meyer, W.; Wanke, B.; Costa, S.P.; Trilles, L.; Nascimento, J.L.; Medeiros, R.; Morales, B.P.; Bezerra Cde, C.; Macedo, R.C.; et al. Primary endemic Cryptococcosis gattii by molecular type VGII in the state of Pará, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2008, 103, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Trilles, L.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Oliveira, R.V.; Barbosa, G.G.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Morales, B.P.; Meyer, W. Regional pattern of the molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2008, 103, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Costa Sdo, P.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Santos, W.R.; Morales, B.P.; Bezerra, C.C.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Barbosa, G.G.; Trilles, L.; Nascimento, J.L.; Wanke, B. First isolation of Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGII and Cryptococcus neoformans molecular type VNI from environmental sources in the city of Belem, Para, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2009, 104, 662–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Andrade-Silva, L.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Silva-Vergara, M.L.; Pedrosa, A.L. Molecular characterization and evaluation of virulence factors of Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus neoformans strains isolated from external hospital areas. Fungal Biol. 2010, 114, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pinto Junior, V.L.; Pone, M.V.; Pone, S.M.; Campos, J.M.; Garrido, J.R.; de Barros, A.C.; Trilles, L.; Barbosa, G.G.; Morales, B.P.; Bezerra Cde, C.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGII as agent of meningitis in a healthy child in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Report of an autochthonous case. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2010, 43, 746–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Souza, L.K.; Souza Junior, A.H.; Costa, C.R.; Faganello, J.; Vainstein, M.H.; Chagas, A.L.; Souza, A.C.; Silva, M.R. Molecular typing and antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans species complex isolates in Goiania, Brazil. Mycoses 2010, 53, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ferreira-Paim, K.; Andrade-Silva, L.; Mora, D.J.; Pedrosa, A.L.; Rodrigues, V.; Silva-Vergara, M.L. Genotyping of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from captive birds in Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mycoses 2011, 54, e294–e300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martins, L.M.; Wanke, B.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Trilles, L.; Barbosa, G.G.; Macedo, R.C.; Cavalcanti Mdo, A.; Eulalio, K.D.; Castro, J.A.; Silva, A.S.; et al. Genotypes of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii as agents of endemic cryptococcosis in Teresina, Piaui (northeastern Brazil). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2011, 106, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. da Silva, B.K.; Freire, A.K.; Bentes Ados, S.; Sampaio Ide, L.; Santos, L.O.; Dos Santos, M.S.; De Souza, J.V. Characterization of clinical isolates of the Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex from the Amazonas State in Brazil. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2012, 29, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Freire, A.K.; dos Santos Bentes, A.; de Lima Sampaio, I.; Matsuura, A.B.; Ogusku, M.M.; Salem, J.I.; Wanke, B.; de Souza, J.V. Molecular characterisation of the causative agents of Cryptococcosis in patients of a tertiary healthcare facility in the state of Amazonas-Brazil. Mycoses 2012, 55, e145–e150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Silva, D.C.; Martins, M.A.; Szeszs, M.W.; Bonfietti, L.X.; Matos, D.; Melhem, M.S. Susceptibility to antifungal agents and genotypes of Brazilian clinical and environmental Cryptococcus gattii strains. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 72, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cardoso, P.H.; Baroni Fde, A.; Silva, E.G.; Nascimento, D.C.; Martins Mdos, A.; Szezs, W.; Paula, C.R. Feline nasal granuloma due to Cryptoccocus gattii type VGII. Mycopathologia 2013, 176, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tsujisaki, R.A.; Paniago, A.M.; Lima Junior, M.S.; Alencar Dde, S.; Spositto, F.L.; Nunes Mde, O.; Trilles, L.; Chang, M.R. First molecular typing of cryptococcemia-causing cryptococcus in central-west Brazil. Mycopathologia 2013, 176, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Anzai, M.C.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Trilles, L.; Dutra, V.; de Paula, D.A.; Nakazato, L.; Takahara, D.T.; Simi, W.B.; Hahn, R.C. Cryptococcus gattii VGII in a Plathymenia reticulata hollow in Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mycoses 2014, 57, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Favalessa, O.C.; de Paula, D.A.; Dutra, V.; Nakazato, L.; Tadano, T.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Trilles, L.; Walderez Szeszs, M.; Silva, D.; et al. Molecular typing and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus spp from patients in Midwest Brazil. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Favalessa, O.C.; Lazera Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Trilles, L.; Takahara, D.T.; Tadano, T.; Dias, L.B.; Vieira, A.C.; Novack, G.V.; Hahn, R.C. Fatal Cryptococcus gattii genotype AFLP6/VGII infection in a HIV-negative patient: Case report and a literature review. Mycoses 2014, 57, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nascimento, E.; Bonifacio da Silva, M.E.; Martinez, R.; von Zeska Kress, M.R. Primary cutaneous cryptococcosis in an immunocompetent patient due to Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGI in Brazil: A case report and review of literature. Mycoses 2014, 57, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brito-Santos, F.; Barbosa, G.G.; Trilles, L.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Wanke, B.; Meyer, W.; Carvalho-Costa, F.A.; Lazera Mdos, S. Environmental isolation of Cryptococcus gattii VGII from indoor dust from typical wooden houses in the deep Amazonas of the Rio Negro basin. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Headley, S.A.; Di Santis, G.W.; de Alcantara, B.K.; Costa, T.C.; da Silva, E.O.; Pretto-Giordano, L.G.; Gomes, L.A.; Alfieri, A.A.; Bracarense, A.P. Cryptococcus gattii-induced infections in dogs from Southern Brazil. Mycopathologia 2015, 180, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Castro e Silva, D.M.; Santos, D.C.; Martins, M.A.; Oliveira, L.; Szeszs, M.W.; Melhem, M.S. First isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans genotype VNI MAT-alpha from wood inside hollow trunks of Hymenaea courbaril. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Figueiredo, T.P.; Lucas, R.C.; Cazzaniga, R.A.; Franca, C.N.; Segato, F.; Taglialegna, R.; Maffei, C.M. Antifungal susceptibility testing and genotyping characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans and gattii isolates from HIV-infected patients of Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2016, 58, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Alves, G.S.; Freire, A.K.; Bentes Ados, S.; Pinheiro, J.F.; de Souza, J.V.; Wanke, B.; Matsuura, T.; Jackisch-Matsuura, A.B. Molecular typing of environmental Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii species complex isolates from Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Mycoses 2016, 59, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Herkert, P.F.; Hagen, F.; de Oliveira Salvador, G.L.; Gomes, R.R.; Ferreira, M.S.; Vicente, V.A.; Muro, M.D.; Pinheiro, R.L.; Meis, J.F.; Queiroz-Telles, F. Molecular characterisation and antifungal susceptibility of clinical Cryptococcus deuterogattii (AFLP6/VGII) isolates from Southern Brazil. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 35, 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lomes, N.R.; Melhem, M.S.; Szeszs, M.W.; Martins Mdos, A.; Buccheri, R. Cryptococcosis in non-HIV/non-transplant patients: A Brazilian case series. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Souto, A.C.; Bonfietti, L.X.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Trilles, L.; Martins, M.; Ribeiro-Alves, M.; Pham, C.D.; Martins, L.; Dos Santos, W.; Chang, M.; et al. Population genetic analysis reveals a high genetic diversity in the Brazilian Cryptococcus gattii VGII population and shifts the global origin from the Amazon rainforest to the semi-arid desert in the Northeast of Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop Dis. 2016, 10, e0004885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Aguiar, P.; Pedroso, R.D.S.; Borges, A.S.; Moreira, T.A.; Araujo, L.B.; Roder, D. The epidemiology of cryptococcosis and the characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated in a Brazilian University Hospital. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2017, 59, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. da Silva, E.C.; Guerra, J.M.; Torres, L.N.; Lacerda, A.M.; Gomes, R.G.; Rodrigues, D.M.; Ressio, R.A.; Melville, P.A.; Martin, C.C.; Benesi, F.J.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGII infection associated with lung disease in a goat. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. de Abreu, D.P.B.; Machado, C.H.; Makita, M.T.; Botelho, C.F.M.; Oliveira, F.G.; da Veiga, C.C.P.; Martins, M.D.A.; Baroni, F.A. Intestinal Lesion in a Dog Due to Cryptococcus gattii Type VGII and Review of Published Cases of Canine Gastrointestinal Cryptococcosis. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Carvalho Santana, R.; Schiave, L.A.; Dos Santos Quaglio, A.S.; de Gaitani, C.M.; Martinez, R. Fluconazole non-susceptible Cryptococcus neoformans, relapsing/refractory cryptococcosis and long-term use of liposomal amphotericin B in an AIDS patient. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ferreira-Paim, K.; Andrade-Silva, L.; Fonseca, F.M.; Ferreira, T.B.; Mora, D.J.; Andrade-Silva, J.; Khan, A.; Dao, A.; Reis, E.C.; Almeida, M.T.; et al. MLST-based population genetic analysis in a global context reveals clonality amongst Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii VNI isolates from HIV patients in Southeastern Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Maciel, R.A.; Ferreira, L.S.; Wirth, F.; Rosa, P.D.; Aves, M.; Turra, E.; Goldani, L.Z. Corticosteroids for the management of severe intracranial hypertension in meningoencephalitis caused by Cryptococcus gattii: A case report and review. J. Mycol. Med. 2017, 27, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Andrade-Silva, L.E.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Ferreira, T.B.; Vilas-Boas, A.; Mora, D.J.; Manzato, V.M.; Fonseca, F.M.; Buosi, K.; Andrade-Silva, J.; Prudente, B.D.S.; et al. Genotypic analysis of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Brazil reveals the presence of VNB isolates and a correlation with biological factors. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Bianchi, R.M.; Santana de Cecco, B.; Schwerts, C.I.; Panziera, W.; Pinto de Andrade, C.; Spanamberg, A.; Ravazzolo, A.P.; Ferreiro, L.; Driemeier, D. Pneumonia by Cryptococcus neoformans in a goat in the Southern region of Brazil. Cienc. Rural. 2018, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Herkert, P.F.; Meis, J.F.; Lucca de Oliveira Salvador, G.; Rodrigues Gomes, R.; Aparecida Vicente, V.; Dominguez Muro, M.; Lameira Pinheiro, R.; Lopes Colombo, A.; Vargas Schwarzbold, A.; Sakuma de Oliveira, C.; et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans sensu stricto from southern Brazil. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nunes, J.O.; Tsujisaki, R.A.S.; Nunes, M.O.; Lima, G.M.E.; Paniago, A.M.M.; Pontes, E.; Chang, M.R. Cryptococcal meningitis epidemiology: 17 years of experience in a State of the Brazilian Pantanal. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2018, 51, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rocha, D.F.S.; Cruz, K.S.; Santos, C.; Menescal, L.S.F.; Neto, J.; Pinheiro, S.B.; Silva, L.M.; Trilles, L.; Braga de Souza, J.V. MLST reveals a clonal population structure for Cryptococcus neoformans molecular type VNI isolates from clinical sources in Amazonas, Northern-Brazil. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Wirth, F.; Azevedo, M.I.; Goldani, L.Z. Molecular types of Cryptococcus species isolated from patients with cryptococcal meningitis in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 22, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Brito-Santos, F.; Reis, R.S.; Coelho, R.A.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Pereira, S.A.; Trilles, L.; Meyer, W.; Wanke, B.; Lazera, M.D.S.; Gremiao, I.D.F. Cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus gattii VGII in southeast Brazil: The One Health approach revealing a possible role for domestic cats. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2019, 24, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Damasceno-Escoura, A.H.; de Souza, M.L.; de Oliveira Nunes, F.; Pardi, T.C.; Gazotto, F.C.; Florentino, D.H.; Mora, D.J.; Silva-Vergara, M.L. Epidemiological, clinical and outcome aspects of patients with cryptococcosis caused by Cryptococcus gattii from a non-endemic area of Brazil. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dos Santos Bentes, A.; Wanke, B.; Dos Santos Lazera, M.; Freire, A.K.L.; da Silva Junior, R.M.; Rocha, D.F.S.; Pinheiro, S.B.; Zelski, S.E.; Matsuura, A.B.J.; da Rocha, L.C.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii VGII isolated from native forest and river in Northern Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maruyama, F.H.; de Paula, D.A.J.; Menezes, I.G.; Favalessa, O.C.; Hahn, R.C.; de Almeida, A.; Sousa, V.R.F.; Nakazato, L.; Dutra, V. Genetic diversity of the Cryptococcus gattii species complex in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ponzio, V.; Chen, Y.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Tenor, J.L.; Toffaletti, D.L.; Medina-Pestana, J.O.; Colombo, A.L.; Perfect, J.R. Genotypic diversity and clinical outcome of cryptococcosis in renal transplant recipients in Brazil. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Vechi, H.T.; Theodoro, R.C.; de Oliveira, A.L.; Gomes, R.; Soares, R.D.A.; Freire, M.G.; Bay, M.B. Invasive fungal infection by Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii with bone marrow and meningeal involvement in a HIV-infected patient: A case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brito-Santos, F.; Trilles, L.; Firacative, C.; Wanke, B.; Carvalho-Costa, F.A.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Campos, J.P.; Junqueira, A.C.V.; Souza, A.C.; Lazera, M.D.S.; et al. Indoor dust as a source of virulent strains of the agents of cryptococcosis in the Rio Negro Micro-Region of the Brazilian Amazon. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. da Silva, L.B.; Bock, D.; Klafke, G.B.; Sanchotene, K.O.; Basso, R.P.; Benelli, J.L.; Poester, V.R.; da Silva, F.A.; Trilles, L.; Severo, C.B.; et al. Cryptococcosis in HIV-AIDS patients from Southern Brazil: Still a major problem. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 101044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Grizante Bariao, P.H.; Tonani, L.; Cocio, T.A.; Martinez, R.; Nascimento, E.; von Zeska Kress, M.R. Molecular typing, in vitro susceptibility and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii species complex clinical isolates from south-eastern Brazil. Mycoses 2020, 63, 1341–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pinheiro, S.B.; Sousa, E.S.; Cortez, A.C.A.; da Silva Rocha, D.F.; Menescal, L.S.F.; Chagas, V.S.; Gomez, A.S.P.; Cruz, K.S.; Santos, L.O.; Alves, M.J.; et al. Cryptococcal meningitis in non-HIV patients in the State of Amazonas, Northern Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Silva, L.M.; Ferreira, W.A.; Filho, R.; Lacerda, M.V.G.; Ferreira, G.M.A.; Saunier, M.N.; Macedo, M.M.; Cristo, D.A.; Alves, M.J.; Jackisch-Matsuura, A.B.; et al. New ST623 of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from a patient with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the Brazilian Amazon. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Vilas-Boas, A.M.; Andrade-Silva, L.E.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Mora, D.J.; Ferreira, T.B.; Santos, D.A.; Borges, A.S.; Melhem, M.S.C.; Silva-Vergara, M.L. High genetic variability of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus gattii isolates from Brazil. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 1126–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Escandón, P.; Sánchez, A.; Martinez, M.; Meyer, W.; Castaneda, E. Molecular epidemiology of clinical and environmental isolates of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex reveals a high genetic diversity and the presence of the molecular type VGII mating type a in Colombia. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Escandón, P.; Sánchez, A.; Firacative, C.; Castaneda, E. Isolation of Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGIII, from Corymbia ficifolia detritus in Colombia. Med. Mycol. 2010, 48, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Firacative, C.; Torres, G.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Escandon, P. First environmental isolation of Cryptococcus gattii serotype B, from Cucuta, Colombia. Biomedica 2011, 31, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Lizarazo, J.; Chaves, O.; Peña, Y.; Escandón, P.; Agudelo, C.I.; Castañeda, E. Comparación de los hallazgos clínicos y de supervivencia entre pacientes VIH positivos y VIH negativos con criptococosis meníngea en un hospital del tercer nivel. Acta Médica. Colomb. 2012, 37, 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lizarazo, J.; Escandón, P.; Agudelo, C.I.; Castañeda, E. Cryptococcosis in Colombian children and literature review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2014, 109, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lizarazo, J.; Escandón, P.; Agudelo, C.I.; Firacative, C.; Meyer, W.; Castañeda, E. Retrospective study of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Cryptococcus gattii infections in Colombia from 1997-2011. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Noguera, M.C.; Escandón, P.; Castañeda, E. Cryptococcosis in Atlantico, Colombia: An approximation of the prevalence of this mycosis and the distribution of the etiological agent in the environment. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2015, 48, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Cogliati, M.; Zani, A.; Rickerts, V.; McCormick, I.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Velegraki, A.; Escandon, P.; Ichikawa, T.; Ikeda, R.; Bienvenu, A.L.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing analysis reveals that Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans is a recombinant population. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 87, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Noguera, M.C.; Escandon, P.; Castaneda, E. Fatal Cryptococcus gattii genotype VGI infection in an HIV-positive patient in Barranquilla, Colombia. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2017, 59, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vélez, N.; Escandón, P. Report on novel environmental niches for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Colombia: Tabebuia guayacan and Roystonea regia. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Anacona, C.; González, C.F.E.; Vásquez-A., L.R.; Escandón, P. First isolation and molecular characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii in excreta of birds in the urban perimeter of the Municipality of Popayan, Colombia. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2018, 35, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Virviescas, B.C.; Aragón, M.; Vásquez, A.L.; González, F.; Escandón, P.; Castro, H. Molecular characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans recovered from pigeon droppings in Rivera and Neiva, Colombia. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2018, 23, 6991–6997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Angarita-Sánchez, A.; Cárdenas-Sierra, D.; Parra-Giraldo, C.; Diaz-Carvajal, C.; Escandón-Hernández, P. Recuperación de Cryptococcus neoformans y C. gattii ambientales y su asociación con aislados clínicos en Cúcuta, Colombia. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2019, 24, 7137–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Firacative, C.; Torres, G.; Meyer, W.; Escandon, P. Clonal dispersal of Cryptococcus gattii VGII in an endemic region of cryptococcosis in Colombia. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Noguera, M.C.; Escandón, P.; Arévalo, M.; García, Y.; Suárez, L.E.; Castañeda, E. Prevalence of cryptococcosis in Atlántico, department of Colombia assessed with an active epidemiological search. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20180194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Noguera, M.C.; Escandón, P.; Arévalo, M.; Piedrahita, J.; Castañeda, E. Fatal neurocryptococcosis in a Colombian underage patient. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2019, 13, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Velez, N.; Escandon, P. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of clinical and environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in six departments of Colombia reveals high genetic diversity. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2020, 53, e20190422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Refojo, N.; Perrotta, D.; Brudny, M.; Abrantes, R.; Hevia, A.I.; Davel, G. Isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii from trunk hollows of living trees in Buenos Aires City, Argentina. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cattana, M.E.; Tracogna, M.F.; Fernandez, M.S.; Carol Rey, M.C.; Sosa, M.A.; Giusiano, G.E. [Genotyping of Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii complex clinical isolates from Hospital "Dr. Julio, C. Perrando", Resistencia city (Chaco, Argentina)]. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2013, 45, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  112. Mazza, M.; Refojo, N.; Bosco-Borgeat, M.E.; Taverna, C.G.; Trovero, A.C.; Roge, A.; Davel, G. Cryptococcus gattii in urban trees from cities in North-eastern Argentina. Mycoses 2013, 56, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cattana, M.E.; Sosa Mde, L.; Fernandez, M.; Rojas, F.; Mangiaterra, M.; Giusiano, G. Native trees of the Northeast Argentine: Natural hosts of the Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Cattana, M.E.; Fernandez, M.S.; Rojas, F.D.; Sosa Mde, L.; Giusiano, G. [Genotypes and epidemiology of clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans in Corrientes, Argentina]. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2015, 47, 82–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Cicora, F.; Petroni, J.; Formosa, P.; Roberti, J. A rare case of Cryptococcus gattii pneumonia in a renal transplant patient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2015, 17, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Arechavala, A.; Negroni, R.; Messina, F.; Romero, M.; Marín, E.; Depardo, R.; Walker, L.; Santiso, G. Cryptococcosis in an Infectious Diseases Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revision of 2041 cases: Diagnosis, clinical features and therapeutics. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2018, 35, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Berejnoi, A.; Taverna, C.G.; Mazza, M.; Vivot, M.; Isla, G.; Cordoba, S.; Davel, G. First case report of cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus decagattii in a pediatric patient in Argentina. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20180419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Santiso, G.M.; Messina, F.; Gallo, A.; Marin, E.; Depardo, R.; Arechavala, A.; Walker, L.; Negroni, R.; Romero, M.M. Tongue lesion due to Cryptococcus neoformans as the first finding in an HIV-positive patient. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Taverna, C.G.; Bosco-Borgeat, M.E.; Mazza, M.; Vivot, M.E.; Davel, G.; Canteros, C.E.; AGC. Frequency and geographical distribution of genotypes and mating types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes in Argentina. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2020, 52, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Olivares, L.R.; Martinez, K.M.; Cruz, R.M.; Rivera, M.A.; Meyer, W.; Espinosa, R.A.; Martinez, R.L.; Santos, G.M. Genotyping of Mexican Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii isolates by PCR-fingerprinting. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gonzalez, G.M.; Casillas-Vega, N.; Garza-Gonzalez, E.; Hernandez-Bello, R.; Rivera, G.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Bocanegra-Garcia, V. Molecular typing of clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii species complex from Northeast Mexico. Folia Microbiol. 2016, 61, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Martinez-Machin, G.F.; Fernandez-Andreu, C.M.; Boekhout, T.; Meis, J.F.; Klaassen, C.H. Microsatellite typing of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii isolates from Cuba shows multiple genetic lineages. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Hagen, F.; Fernandez-Andreu, C.M.; Martinez-Machin, G.F.; Polo-Leal, J.L.; Boekhout, T.; Klaassen, C.H.; Meis, J.F. Reactivation of a Cryptococcus gattii infection in a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) held in the National Zoo, Havana, Cuba. Mycoses 2011, 54, e889–e892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T.; Ortega-Gonzalez, L.M.; Hagen, F.; Martinez-Machin, G.F.; Meis, J.F. Fatal Cryptococcus gattii genotype AFLP5 infection in an immunocompetent Cuban patient. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2013, 2, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Calvo, B.M.; Colombo, A.L.; Fischman, O.; Santiago, A.; Thompson, L.; Lazera, M.; Telles, F.; Fukushima, K.; Nishimura, K.; Tanaka, R.; et al. Antifungal susceptibilities, varieties, and electrophoretic karyotypes of clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans from Brazil, Chile, and Venezuela. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 2348–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Ferrara, G.; Panizo, M.M.; Urdaneta, E.; Alarcón, V.; García, N.; Moreno, X.; Capote, A.M.; Reviakina, V.; Dolande, M. Characterization by PCR-RFLP of the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complex in Venezuela. Investig. Clin. 2018, 59, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bejar, V.; Tello, M.; Garcia, R.; Guevara, J.M.; Gonzales, S.; Vergaray, G.; Valencia, E.; Abanto, E.; Ortega-Loayza, A.G.; Hagen, F.; et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans strains collected from a single institution in Lima, Peru. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2015, 32, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. van de Wiele, N.; Neyra, E.; Firacative, C.; Gilgado, F.; Serena, C.; Bustamante, B.; Meyer, W. Molecular epidemiology reveals low genetic diversity among Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from people living with HIV in Lima, Peru, during the Pre-HAART era. Pathogens 2020, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mata-Delgado, C.; Lozada-Alvarado, S.; Gross, N.T.; Jaikel-Víquez, D. Caracterización fenotípica y genotípica de aislamientos clínicos de los complejos de especies Cryptococcus neoformans y Cryptococcus gattii en Costa Rica. Rev. Panam. Enferm. Infecc. 2019, 2, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  130. Sánches, S.; Zambrano, D.; García, M.; Bedoya, C.; Fernández, C.; Illnait-Zaragozi, M.T. Caracterización molecular de los aislamientos de Cryptococcus neoformans de pacientes con HIV, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Biomedica 2017, 37, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Parra-Vera, H.J.; Espinoza, W.A.; Godoy-Martínez, P.; Silva-Rojas, G.A.; Aguilar-Buele, E.A.; Farfán-Cano, G.G.; Buele, C.D. Primer reporte de Cryptococcus gattii en Ecuador. Revista Científica INSPILIP 2019, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  132. Solar, S.; Diaz, V.; Rosas, R.; Valenzuela, S.; Pires, Y.; Diaz, M.; Noriega, L.; Porte, L.; Weitzel, T.; Thompson, L. Infección de sistema nervioso central por Cryptococcus gattii en paciente inmunocompetente: Desafíos diagnósticos y terapéuticos en un Centro Terciario de Referencia de Paciente Internacional en Santiago de Chile. INFOCUS 2015, 4, 116. [Google Scholar]
  133. Vieille, P.; Cruz, R.; Leon, P.; Caceres, N.; Giusiano, G. Isolation of Cryptococcus gattii VGIII from feline nasal injury. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2018, 22, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Thompson, L.; Porte, L.; Diaz, V.; Diaz, M.C.; Solar, S.; Valenzuela, P.; Norley, N.; Pires, Y.; Carreno, F.; Valenzuela, S.; et al. Cryptococcus bacillisporus (VGIII) meningoencephalitis acquired in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Engelthaler, D.M.; Hicks, N.D.; Gillece, J.D.; Roe, C.C.; Schupp, J.M.; Driebe, E.M.; Gilgado, F.; Carriconde, F.; Trilles, L.; Firacative, C.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii in North American Pacific Northwest: Whole-population genome analysis provides insights into species evolution and dispersal. MBio 2014, 5, e01464-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Aminnejad, M.; Cogliati, M.; Duan, S.; Arabatzis, M.; Tintelnot, K.; Castaneda, E.; Lazera, M.; Velegraki, A.; Ellis, D.; Sorrell, T.C.; et al. Identification and characterization of VNI/VNII and novel VNII/VNIV hybrids and impact of hybridization on virulence and antifungal susceptibility within the C. neoformans/C. gattii species complex. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Aminnejad, M.; Diaz, M.; Arabatzis, M.; Castañeda, E.; Lazera, M.; Velegraki, A.; Marriott, D.; Sorrell, T.C.; Meyer, W. Identification of novel hybrids between Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii VNI and Cryptococcus gattii VGII. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Velez, N.; Alvarado, M.; Parra-Giraldo, C.M.; Sanchez-Quitian, Z.A.; Escandon, P.; Castaneda, E. Genotypic diversity is independent of pathogenicity in Colombian strains of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Galleria mellonella. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Walraven, C.J.; Gerstein, W.; Hardison, S.E.; Wormley, F.; Lockhart, S.R.; Harris, J.R.; Fothergill, A.; Wickes, B.; Gober-Wilcox, J.; Massie, L.; et al. Fatal disseminated Cryptococcus gattii infection in New Mexico. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Firacative, C.; Trilles, L.; Meyer, W. MALDI-TOF MS enables the rapid identification of the major molecular types within the Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii species complex. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Hagen, F.; Colom, M.F.; Swinne, D.; Tintelnot, K.; Iatta, R.; Montagna, M.T.; Torres-Rodriguez, J.M.; Cogliati, M.; Velegraki, A.; Burggraaf, A.; et al. Autochthonous and dormant Cryptococcus gattii infections in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1618–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Barcellos, V.A.; Martins, L.M.S.; Fontes, A.C.L.; Reuwsaat, J.C.V.; Squizani, E.D.; de Sousa Araujo, G.R.; Frases, S.; Staats, C.C.; Schrank, A.; Kmetzsch, L.; et al. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Cryptococcus gattii VGII clinical isolates and its impact on virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kidd, S.E.; Hagen, F.; Tscharke, R.L.; Huynh, M.; Bartlett, K.H.; Fyfe, M.; Macdougall, L.; Boekhout, T.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Meyer, W. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17258–17263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergence of Cryptococcus gattii-Pacific Northwest, 2004–2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2010, 59, 865–868. [Google Scholar]
  145. Bartlett, K.H.; Cheng, P.Y.; Duncan, C.; Galanis, E.; Hoang, L.; Kidd, S.; Lee, M.K.; Lester, S.; MacDougall, L.; Mak, S.; et al. A decade of experience: Cryptococcus gattii in British Columbia. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Severo, C.B.; Xavier, M.O.; Gazzoni, A.F.; Severo, L.C. Cryptococcosis in children. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2009, 10, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Darze, C.; Lucena, R.; Gomes, I.; Melo, A. [The clinical laboratory characteristics of 104 cases of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis]. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2000, 33, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  148. Correa Mdo, P.; Oliveira, E.C.; Duarte, R.R.; Pardal, P.P.; Oliveira Fde, M.; Severo, L.C. Cryptococcosis in children in the State of Para, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 1999, 32, 505–508. [Google Scholar]
  149. Ellis, D.H.; Pfeiffer, T.J. Natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 1642–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Lazera, M.S.; Pires, F.D.; Camillo-Coura, L.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Bezerra, C.C.; Trilles, L.; Wanke, B. Natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans in decaying wood forming hollows in living trees. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1996, 34, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Lazera, M.S.; Cavalcanti, M.A.; Trilles, L.; Nishikawa, M.M.; Wanke, B. Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii-evidence for a natural habitat related to decaying wood in a pottery tree hollow. Med. Mycol. 1998, 36, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  152. Mitchell, T.G.; Castañeda, E.; Nielsen, K.; Wanke, B.; Lazéra, M.S. Environmental Niches for Cryptococcus Neoformans and Cryptococcus ga$ttii. In Cryptococcus: From Human Pathogen to Model Yeast; Heitman, J., Kozel, T.R., Kwon-Chung, J.K., Perfect, J.R., Casadevall, A., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  153. Granados, D.P.; Castañeda, E. Influence of climatic conditions on the isolation of members of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex from trees in Colombia from 1992–2004. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Escandón, P.; Quintero, E.; Granados, D.; Huerfano, S.; Ruiz, A.; Castañeda, E. [Isolation of Cryptococcus gattii serotype B from detritus of Eucalyptus trees in Colombia]. Biomedica 2005, 25, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Malik, R.; Krockenberger, M.B.; O’Brien, C.R.; Carter, D.; Meyer, W.; Canfield, P.J. Veterinary Insights into Cryptococcosis Caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. In Cryptococcus: From Human Pathogen to Model Yeast; Heitman, J., Kozel, T.R., Kwon-Chung, K.J., Perfect, J.R., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Herndon, VA, USA, 2010; pp. 489–504. [Google Scholar]
  156. Krockenberger, M.; Stalder, K.; Malik, R.; Canfield, P. Cryptococcosis in Australian Wildlife. Microbiol. Aust. 2005, 26, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lockhart, S.R.; Iqbal, N.; Harris, J.R.; Grossman, N.T.; DeBess, E.; Wohrle, R.; Marsden-Haug, N.; Vugia, D.J. Cryptococcus gattii in the United States: Genotypic diversity of human and veterinary isolates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Singer, L.M.; Meyer, W.; Firacative, C.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Samitz, E.; Sykes, J.E. Antifungal drug susceptibility and phylogenetic diversity among Cryptococcus isolates from dogs and cats in North America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2061–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Litvintseva, A.P.; Marra, R.E.; Nielsen, K.; Heitman, J.; Vilgalys, R.; Mitchell, T.G. Evidence of sexual recombination among Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates in sub-Saharan Africa. Eukaryot. Cell 2003, 2, 1162–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Litvintseva, A.P.; Carbone, I.; Rossouw, J.; Thakur, R.; Govender, N.P.; Mitchell, T.G. Evidence that the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii may have evolved in Africa. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Chen, S.C.; Meyer, W.; Sorrell, T.C. Cryptococcus gattii infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 980–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jof 07 00282 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of the molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes in Latin America.
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of the molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes in Latin America.
Jof 07 00282 g001
Jof 07 00282 g002 550
Figure 2. Dendrograms showing the genetic relationship of clinical (red), environmental (green), and veterinary (yellow) (a) Cryptococcus neoformans species complex (n = 367) and (b) Cryptococcus gattii species complex (n = 400) isolates from Latin America, according to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data. The five most common sequence types, ST93, ST77, ST2, ST5, and ST23 for C. neoformans, and ST25, ST20, ST7, ST79, and ST40 for C. gattii, are indicated in each dendrogram. Isolates from an unknown source are indicated in grey.
Figure 2. Dendrograms showing the genetic relationship of clinical (red), environmental (green), and veterinary (yellow) (a) Cryptococcus neoformans species complex (n = 367) and (b) Cryptococcus gattii species complex (n = 400) isolates from Latin America, according to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data. The five most common sequence types, ST93, ST77, ST2, ST5, and ST23 for C. neoformans, and ST25, ST20, ST7, ST79, and ST40 for C. gattii, are indicated in each dendrogram. Isolates from an unknown source are indicated in grey.
Jof 07 00282 g002
Table
Table 1. Distribution of the major molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates reported from Latin American countries.
Table 1. Distribution of the major molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates reported from Latin American countries.
C. neoformans Species ComplexC. gattii Species Complex
Country [Ref]nSourceVNIVNIIVNIIIVNIVVGIVGIIVGIIIVGIVTotal
Brazil [18,20,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]2762 1Cli1537 291-221409 2,318-2078
Env365161237242 3--654
Vet3----14--17
Colombia [18,32,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]1436Cli396 319 3-61264 2,3402539
Env6866--4 2107 28311897
Argentina [18,20,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119]644Cli53215316622 3-600
Env19---23 2-44
Mexico [18,32,120,121]321Cli2092112711526 27298
Env18-----5-23
Cuba [17,35,122,123,124]247Cli141--36--1-178
Env68-------68
Vet----1---1
Venezuela [18,32,125,126]101Cli70101-5123-101
Peru [18,127,128]85Cli6416221---85
Costa Rica [129]36Cli2211--2--136
Ecuador [130,131]28Cli27---1---28
Chile [18,125,132,133]20Cli4335----15
Env4-------4
Vet------1-1
Guatemala [18]15Cli14-----1-15
Bolivia [134]1Cli------1-1
Honduras [15]1Cli----1---1
Paraguay [32]1Cli------1-1
Uruguay [135]1Env-----1--1
Cli302218649646049293103976
Env1160221233435090111691
Vet3---1141-19
Total4185208508795856184215686
1 Six clinical and seven environmental VNB isolates are included. 2 Mating type a was reported among the isolates. 3 Pediatric cases were reported among the clinical isolates. Cli: clinical; Env: environmental; Vet: veterinary.
Table
Table 2. Genotypic diversity of the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes populations from Latin America, according to multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
Table 2. Genotypic diversity of the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes populations from Latin America, according to multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
Population Group
Species ComplexMTClinicalEnvironmentalVeterinaryTotal
C. neoformansVNI26276-344 2
VNB-5-5
VNII12--12
VNIV6--6
n of isolates28081-367 2
n of STs3416-41
D10.61490.7247-0.7104
C. gattiiVGI282131
VGII2078210299
VGIII3732-69
VGIV1--1
n of isolates27311611400
n of STs1251168149
D10.98060.91950.92730.9755
1D: Simpsons diversity index. 2 Six C. neoformans isolates were from unknown source. MT: molecular type.
Table
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin-B and 5-fluorocytosine for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates from Latin America, according to the molecular type. Non-wild-type minimum inhibitory concentrations are underlined.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin-B and 5-fluorocytosine for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates from Latin America, according to the molecular type. Non-wild-type minimum inhibitory concentrations are underlined.
Amphotericin-B (µg/mL)5-Fluorocytosine (µg/mL)
MTnRangeGMRangeGMRef.
VNI990.016–0.1250.0990.25–82.519[77] 1
260.03–0.250.060 [79] 1
180.03–1-0.125–4-[89] 1
750.03–20.348 [116] 1
190.125–0.25-0.5–8-[17] 1
70.125–0.25- [65] 2
10.125- [72] 2
170.5–10.6700.5–82.770[58] 1
10.5-2-[91] 5
VNII20.120.120 [116] 1
VNIII40.06–0.50.173 [116] 1
VGI10.06-8-[60] 1
40.125–0.50.290 [54] 3
10.125-8-[123] 1
10.125-0.5-[124] 1
VGII40.03–0.1250.060 [79] 1
70.03–0.25- [90] 1
80.03–0.50.1050.5–20.771[89] 1
180.06–0.250.0791–83.700[66] 1
500.125–0.50.390 [54] 3
20.125-2–4-[81] 1
10.19- [65] 2
100.5–10.7101–164.92[58] 1
10.5-8-[59] 1
VGIII540.125–20.0300.5–82.095[32] 4
10.125-4-[134] 1
20.25- [117] 3
Methodology to determine antifungal susceptibility: 1 M27-A3 guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2 E-test strips, 3 European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) method E.Def.7.2., 4 Sensititre YeastOne plates, and 5 Vitek-2. MT: molecular type. n: number of studied isolates. GM: geometric mean.
Table
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of azoles for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates from Latin America, according to the molecular type. Non-wild-type minimum inhibitory concentrations are underlined.
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of azoles for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes isolates from Latin America, according to the molecular type. Non-wild-type minimum inhibitory concentrations are underlined.
Fluconazole (µg/mL)Itraconazole (µg/mL)Voriconazole (µg/mL)Posaconazole (µg/mL)
MTnRangeGMRangeGMRangeGMRangeGMRef.
VNI990.125–80.521<0.016–0.250.026<0.016–0.1250.022<0.016–0.1250.027[77] 1
750.125–322.971 [116] 1
190.25–8-<0.016–0.5-<0.016–0.25-0.016–0.125-[17] 1
510.25–167.22 [85] 1
180.5–16-0.06–0.25-0.03–1- [89] 1
171–164.340.03–0.250.090.06–0.50.28 [58] 1
11- [91] 6
262–84.570.03–0.250.07 [79] 1
72–48-0.125–0.5- [65] 3
194–>64- [63] 2
132- [72] 3
VNB64–86.86 [85] 1
VNII21–21.414 [116] 1
141–82.5 [85] 1
VNIII42–42.378 [116] 1
VNIV360.125–64- [35] 4
VGI12- [123] 1
12-0.125-0.063-0.125-[124] 1
44–85.3 [54] 2
18-0.25-0.5- [60] 1
VGII180.5–162.07850.031–0.250.09940.031–0.250.08530.031–0.250.0853[66] 1
80.5–1640.125–0.250.17770.0031–10.148 [89] 1
71–8-0.03–0.125- [90] 1
101–167.460.03–0.50.220.06–0.50.28 [58] 1
501–6412.2 [54] 2
24–16-1-0.12–1- [81] 1
104–6425.82 [85] 1
48–32190.125–0.50.29 [79] 1
18-0.25-0.5- [59] 1
124-0.5- [65] 3
VGIII541–1288.239<0.015–0.1250.061<0.008–10.0330.015–0.250.057[32] 5
24–16-0.125-0.06–0.125- [117] 2
132-0.25-0.25-0.5-[134] 1
Methodology to determine antifungal susceptibility: 1 M27-A3 guidelines of the CLSI, 2 AFST-EUCAST method E.Def.7.2., 3 E-test strips, 4 Casitone broth microdilution method, 5 Sensititre YeastOne plates, and 6 Vitek-2. MT: molecular type. n: number of studied isolates. GM: geometric mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Firacative, C.; Meyer, W.; Castañeda, E. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes in Latin America: A Map of Molecular Types, Genotypic Diversity, and Antifungal Susceptibility as Reported by the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040282

AMA Style

Firacative C, Meyer W, Castañeda E. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes in Latin America: A Map of Molecular Types, Genotypic Diversity, and Antifungal Susceptibility as Reported by the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(4):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Firacative, Carolina, Wieland Meyer, and Elizabeth Castañeda. 2021. "Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes in Latin America: A Map of Molecular Types, Genotypic Diversity, and Antifungal Susceptibility as Reported by the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 4: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop